KZbin keeps turning off notifications, almost every time I check in the bell is no longer selected for all notifications. any one else having the same problem?
@QALibrary5 жыл бұрын
I had this issue - to fix it I had to go into my dashboard as reset the setting there for everything to work again - also youtube last year said 60% of the time notifications just do not work mainly because youtube/google sending out to much data at once etc
@jenniferwhitewolf37845 жыл бұрын
yes.. they are trying to kill smaller monetized channels by every means possible short of just killing channels... which they HAVE done to several non-leftist oriented political viewpoint providers.
@terryboyer13425 жыл бұрын
Yep. Noticing it more all the time. I read further down in the comments that Mentour has a vid on fuel dumping also. I've been subbed to him a long time but I got no notification. I checked and found that my sub was turned off. I didn't do this. Also lately I receive some but not all notifications from other channels. YT is really getting screwed up!
@CMDRSweeper5 жыл бұрын
Just grab your welder and weld that notification button in! Problem solved :D
@luiul15 жыл бұрын
there are other platforms coming up. don't know about the regulations. but people need to stop complaining and leave youtube. it's really that simple.
@sweepleader5 жыл бұрын
Juan, I saw your comment that you have concerns about your edits and breaks. Please do not worry about those, you do a great job with a fantastic amount of factual information in every video. I would be disappointed if you cut information in favor of a smoother delivery. Your edits are not a problem, your background and desire make this channel the best one on KZbin.
@danmurphy17425 жыл бұрын
Edits are no problem.
@rayg90695 жыл бұрын
Totally agree, I have noticed at times it's the pauses that give added meaning to what Juan is saying. When you can't can something in words, do it with a pause.
@markam3065 жыл бұрын
All edits and cuts are completely fine with me as well. I barely notice them, and when I do Juan’s vibe is to review his notes and be correct. I.e. it comes across as a strength !! Plus Juan has that ‘real person’ conversing style, very easy to watch and understand the subject.
@WillysPerformanceCycleCtr5 жыл бұрын
No need to change what you are doing Juan! Your delivery is perfect. I have always thought it showed your forethought and knowledge of the subject while willing to pause and think your way into the next comment. Excellent. Please don’t change anything!
@paulazemeckis78355 жыл бұрын
I find his pauses very helpful especially since I am not a pilot. They help me process what he is trying to communicate. It is nice to see people who deliberately choose their words when speaking. Clearly he cares about his comms to his fans! 😁
@martybunyan125 жыл бұрын
Juan, Mentour Pilot just did a vid on the fuel dump as well and gave a shout out your way and directed people to check out your channel. Very cool! Be prepared for some new subscribers. Have followed both of you for several years. You guys are definitely the "Go To" when it comes to commercial aviation. Would love to see you guys do a collab video sometime. Keep the great content coming. Love your channel!
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
Great idea! Thanks Marty!
@souocara38able5 жыл бұрын
It's good to see these guys referring viewers to each other!
@napoleano27485 жыл бұрын
@@blancolirio Yeah Mentour is in my list too, he's a 737 ng expert and has some really good information. Would be cool to see you guys do something together ;)
@mooorecowbell42225 жыл бұрын
Follow Mentour Pilot as well. Great shout out ....well deserved.
@pnaylor6665 жыл бұрын
We are in a golden age of aviation education networking. Were not just facing a pilot shortage, its a skilled pilot shortage.
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
clarification: The center fuel tank is the wing center section upon which the fuselage is mounted.
@VegasHiRollers5 жыл бұрын
Maybe they dumped the fuel to convince all of the people saying that airliners run on compressed air instead of having real fuel onboard. See folks...it's raining jet fuel from the wing tips !!!
@juanitamannn5 жыл бұрын
Just waiting for Mr. 10000 hour guy to comment from his moms basement.
@mapesdhs5975 жыл бұрын
Juan, off-topic question, have you ever read, "Airframe", by Michael Crichton? I think you would find it interesting, especially how the media is portrayed. I'd like to send you a copy if possible; do you have a PO box or somesuch? I sent a copy to a figher pilot I know in South Africa and he very much enjoyed it. Pity it's never been made into a movie, though I doubt the current Hollywood machine could do it justice (though maybe its technical nature wouldn't translate so well to the big screen).
@murphsmodels88535 жыл бұрын
You were right in the video Juan. The center fuel tank passes through the fuselage and extends into the wings.
@wim01045 жыл бұрын
yup, like a pickup truck: a cab mounted on top of a stiff frame.
@robertedwards78415 жыл бұрын
I am quite convinced that if you spent more time doing editing your channel it would not be as down to earth and informative as it is. When commentaries are too polished they become more like doctored news stories that are short of facts and substance. I am a novice and a huge fan of anything that fly's and I don't always understand everything you say but your efforts of putting everything into layman's terms without speculation and judgement is very much appreciated. Thank you for your time and your efforts. It is much appreciated.
@SueBobChicVid5 жыл бұрын
Not sure if you heard, but you got a shout-out from Mentor Pilot for this coverage.
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
Yes! Thanks.
@joem51105 жыл бұрын
LOL, just watched it and saw Juan did part 2 and now I'm here. :)
@keithpedersen36535 жыл бұрын
You guys should start a consortium of aviation expert channels.
@jenniferwhitewolf37845 жыл бұрын
VAS and Juan and Mentor are on my alert list👍. Each offers a unique and important perspective.
@leewood3655 жыл бұрын
@@keithpedersen3653 Along with Agent Jay Z.
@uralbob15 жыл бұрын
Juan, there is noone on the internet that explains aircraft issues, procedures, and mechanics, etc. like you. When I heard about this fuel jettison, I came right to you as I knew you would help us understand. You provide a great service to we non-flying public. Thank you!
@mornecoetzee7355 жыл бұрын
Thanks for taking the time to shoot with the snow in the background. I live in Africa and never get to see snow. That scene was stunning ❄
@davef.28115 жыл бұрын
"...ask me how I know", have to appreciate your honesty, Juan LOL. Can you imagine trying to explain this event here if the plane in question was a 10 - tank DC-8, or a DC-7C?? Whew!! Nice work as always.
@crocodiledondii5 жыл бұрын
oh yes...we all had a little chuckle over *that* comment.
@WillysPerformanceCycleCtr5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful Snow Storm!!! What a backdrop for the introduction to your report! Thanks Juan. Really appreciate your unbiased, factual reporting. We’re praying for your return to excellent health.
@WillysPerformanceCycleCtr5 жыл бұрын
HiWetcam .... I fully understand! I live in Middle Tennessee, USA and this year we’ve had very little snow! I miss it too’
@alphasails25 жыл бұрын
I could listen to your commentary for hours. You make it so easy to understand. Keep up the great work. Thanks for sharing. ❤️👍
@dryan83775 жыл бұрын
good idea. Imma make an audio track for like 8 hours to sleep to. He's definitely got the voice for this... Thanks for the idea!
@timgallagher10415 жыл бұрын
I DO listen to his commentary for hours :)
@AgentJayZ5 жыл бұрын
This is a great video. It de-mystified a lot. Thanks especially for the clear diagrams and walking us through them. Nobody better at explaining how things happen on a big airliner than an experienced pilot who flies the exact same aircraft!
@Moondoggy19415 жыл бұрын
Wow it has been at least 3 years since I have been watching your channel. It has gone from drought to fires and floods. Thanks for taking everyone with you.
@Truckee-td5ud5 жыл бұрын
Yet another great from the great Juan! Thank you for the update. Hope you and your family are well! Enjoy the beautiful snow. Until next time, see ya here.
@msavAC605 жыл бұрын
Once again Juan, great work in getting us all some enlightening information relating to this incident in Parts I and II. I can't imagine that this crew will be able to provide any legitimate justification for their low altitude fuel dump when they themselves told ATC that their situation wasn't critical once they got the compressor stall under control. Certainly if it was a more dire situation requiring an immediate return, the crew must do whatever is necessary for everyone's safety including throwing the fuel dump guidelines out the window. I'd hate to be in charge of Delta's Public Relations for this one as it took place one day after it was announced that Delta was the Number 1 rated airline.
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
Man, stuff happens quick!
@carolclmcm12145 жыл бұрын
“Stay out of the national news.” Excellent advice for us in all endeavors, I think.
@russlehman20705 жыл бұрын
IME, it's generally not a good day when you make the local news either.
@nhwilkinosn3 жыл бұрын
National news and NTSB investigations.
@carlmarch6035 жыл бұрын
Thank you for great coverage of this event. Hardest Lt. Pete “kablammo” landing I ever had as a passenger was a short SAS leg from Copenhagen to Stockholm on a DC-9 back in the late 80’s. There were a lot of gasps and even crying by passengers after “touchdown.” My uncle used to work for McDonnell-Douglas (space program) and I told him I was impressed with the over-engineering of the landing gear - it took a lot of abuse that day.
@marcmcreynolds28275 жыл бұрын
When a strut is inflated (with dry nitrogen) to the proper amount in temperate weather, but then the aircraft lands somewhere really cold and at a relatively high touchdown sink rate, the strut may actually bottom (metal on metal contact). Kablammo with a vengeance. So occasionally an airline will request the manufacturer to come up with strut inflation pressures which are adjusted for their extreme conditions, like -60 deg F into Moscow.
@carlmarch6035 жыл бұрын
Marc McReynolds It was July and relatively warm for Stockholm. Nonetheless, I bet those struts had seen a lot of extreme conditions during their service on that aircraft...
@specforged56515 жыл бұрын
I second the “Agent Jay” turbine videos. He may very well be the oddest duck you’ve ever come across, but if you want to learn more about turbine engines he’s the guy on KZbin to learn from. It’s actually quite comical too because he’s a different breed for sure. Love it!
@tyrionlannister67695 жыл бұрын
Juan...Thank You and Lt Pete for a comprehensive explanation; was able to keep on multi-tasking whilst listening to your description. Its appreciated...!
@okflyer7775 жыл бұрын
Given something like a compressor stall on departure which didn't result in engine shut-down, my judgement would be to take it out to a safe dump area, sort things out and come back when good and ready. No need for a slam-dunk emergency return, unless that Rolls was in MUCH worse shape than we imagine. Plenty of runway for overweight landing - it would be a piece of cake (I've landed about 24000# overweight in the 777-200 and it was a non-event on SFO 28R). I'd bet this unannounced, low level fuel dump will result in an FAA investigation and a good chance for a serious violation on the part of this flight crew's actions. Really good discussion Juan, as always.
@FutureSystem7385 жыл бұрын
Bill Wightman Right on the money- and your opinion agrees with mine. (I haven’t flown a 777, but have plenty of time in 767’s and 747’s.)
@petec96865 жыл бұрын
@@FutureSystem738 I've never even ridden in a 777. I am not a pilot. I've never even flown a video simulator. But I have a reasonable understanding of mechanical stuff. So, it would seem to me that when an engine stalls for an unknown reason, you should have concerns for the other engine. That being the case, would it not be prudent to put it down as quickly and safely as possible? Is it standard practice to say, "ahhhh, fagettaboutit! we got another one"? And park it out over the Pacific while they vent fuel until they are at an acceptable weight? Seems to me that a little bit of a Jet-A spritz is acceptable rather than risk total engine loss, regardless of its likelyhood.
@davep92665 жыл бұрын
24k over...pretty heavy, had the DL not dumped, they'd have been 70k heavier. Pretty big difference than 24 huh?
@petec96865 жыл бұрын
Bill, is a compressor stall something that happens much? Is there a way to immediately diagnose cause? Could it be FOD? My guess is that when it happens shortly after takeoff, FOD is a possibility, if not the likely cause. And if this is the case, isn't the other engine suspect as well? I have asked this question a few times, but haven't received a reply yet from a professional pilot. So, I will ask again. When an engine stalls during climbout, what are the possible causes? Seems to me that FOD or fuel contamination are at the top of the list. And if this is the case, is there a chance that the other engine may have sustained some damage that has not yet become apparent? The only explanation I can come up with the pilot's decision to put it back on the ground ASAP is that he did not have confidence in his remaining engine. He had to know there'd be repercussions for dumping where and when he did, but was more concerned with the possibility that he was gonna become a glider pilot shortly.
@okflyer7775 жыл бұрын
@@petec9686 Hello - compressor stalls are VERY rare these days. A compressor stall is an aerodynamic stalling of the compressor blades (similar to how a fixed wing can stall) which results in sudden interruption to airflow through the jet engine. CS's can be anything from mild to violent - and in most cases there's no way for the aircrew to diagnose the root cause of the problem. Fan blade icing, or damage are possibilities. A CS can usually be felt, heard and observed by the crew when it happens. A stall occurring shortly after takeoff as in this case *might* have been caused by a damaged blade(s) or maybe not - just no way to tell. I personally would still have complete confidence in the other engine as long as it was performing normally. Big thing here is the incident engine was reported to have recovered after power was retarded - which is what we're trained to do in the event of a CS. If the engine recovers, leave the power where it is (or lower) and sort things out from there. I have a ton of experience with CS's due to my years flying the E3 AWACS. The TF33's there could stall if the power was brought too far back while accessory drive load was high. It was a muffled "bang" type of event, with EGT and EPR (exhaust pressure ratio) jumping around. Simply advancing power would always stop it, and I never saw or heard of any engine being damaged by running it into a stalled condition. Its important to understand that when a "startle event" happens, our cognitive awareness as humans will be instantly compromised. Meaning that our ability to accurately take in inputs from the outside world and then make good decisions from those inputs might be severely compromised. The wrong thing to do is to react inappropriately while cognitive index is low - we call that "rushing to a solution" which is what appears to have happened here.
@deandanielson80745 жыл бұрын
Hi Juan, thank you for a clear, concise and accurate explanation for fuel dumping. You play a vital role in informing both the aviation community and the general public on aviation topics important to all. Again, thanks!! - Dean from Minnesota
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dean!
@rogerneves78985 жыл бұрын
Love your stuff Juan. Don't change a thing about the way you do it.
@raymondjones74895 жыл бұрын
Juan....man you killed it...so awesomely informative...I saw someone in you comments mentioned mentor pilot...I didn't even read it..all I know is that as usual you killed it...this is why I consistently turn to you....thank you!!..take care with health!😊
@vahtikoira21255 жыл бұрын
As an A&P working on large commercial airliners, I've been marinated in JetA for nearly 30 years now so I find all this pearl clutching and claims of injury from being on the receiving end of a little fuel mist a little overblown. The worst part is smelling like fuel until you can clean up and change clothes but I don't think anyone is in danger of anything serious here. I wonder how many lawyers are smelling blood in the water though.
@cassandrab40805 жыл бұрын
Fuel dump? I thought the "smoke" that comes out of airplane wings was a mind-control chemical from the nefarious "Deep State" that no one knows anything about.
@benshore73575 жыл бұрын
Gloria Allred is all over it
@jamesseward37695 жыл бұрын
I love the smell of jet fuel or maybe its the smell of burnt JetA fuel !!! If someone made a cologne out of it I would be the first to buy it !!!
@vahtikoira21255 жыл бұрын
@@jamesseward3769Lol, I'd agree burned fuel smells like a successful flight is happening but unburned fuel smells like more work to fix a leak or problem is about to happen. JetA cologne seems like a stretch to me.🤔
@vahtikoira21255 жыл бұрын
@Jason Richards the original news stories mentioned kids being treated for skin irritation by firefighters at the scene, in following stories it quickly became "treated for injuries" or "kids injured" and inferred they were taken to hospitals, which didn't happen... like I said, overblown.
@flynnwhite81065 жыл бұрын
You are the best "real" aviation information source on KZbin! Love you man!
@chuckeberth43705 жыл бұрын
Thanks for getting part 2 out so quickly. I take it you've seen or done a hard landing or two. I think we all have.
@qcan84685 жыл бұрын
I always liked the comment that the hard landings were the Navy trained pilots and the gentle landings were the Air Force trained pilots.
@jsquared10135 жыл бұрын
@@qcan8468 still with the old habit of trying to catch the arresting gear :D
@roblachman89195 жыл бұрын
Hi Juan. Love your presentations just the way you do them. Love your weather bites as well. Love the snowy back drop at the start...your winter. It is mid summer here in Australia and we are Starting to get some cooler southerly fronts with rain to help put out the fires that are just part of our summer cycle. Best wishes.
@brown-eyedman40405 жыл бұрын
Nice snow. It was torrential rain in th Bay Area. You and Mentour Pilot are the places I go for aviation news/info. Nice shoutout to you from Mentour.
@danielslaven28285 жыл бұрын
Thank you been waiting for you to post this . I'm not a pilot but a big fan who want's to thank you for helping people understand what going on without all technical bull 💩
@wranther5 жыл бұрын
Very informative video Juan as is your pattern. Noticed you received a kind shout out from Mentour Pilot on this same fuel dumping event. -Bob...
@clydeacor19115 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all of the time and effort that you put in to bring us all of this non bias content! It's definitely refreshing when we get a video from you.
@equaltothetaskaviation64405 жыл бұрын
nice one mate, the conversation as to why is alive and well. guess only the flight crew know the answer to that one. as usual your take is clear, concise & thought provoking. even Mentour Pilot gave your channel a shout outso that just goes to show that you are a trusted opinion in the aviation community.
@skunkjobb5 жыл бұрын
I think the airline should tell the public why this was done so we can skip all speculations.
@raymondhorvatin10505 жыл бұрын
Thanks Juan for the detailed breifing
@tenpiloto5 жыл бұрын
I doubt that this situation would qualify for a "heat of battle episode". Looking forward to hearing what the crew had to say regarding fuel dump initiation.
@BillySugger19655 жыл бұрын
Excellent review of the systems and standard procedures involved in this event. Thank you.
@AndrewScott838155 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Again! Great work! I was watching this video during a sit in Seattle and introduced about three other line guys to your channel! Cheers!
@daffidavit5 жыл бұрын
Damn Juan, you are the expert's expert. It's amazing how quickly you come up with the facts. You must have a great team of people working with you. Your channel is one of the two I go to in order to get the facts. I also highly respect Petter at Mentour Pilot. There are many other channels, but yours seems to have the most graphics and statistics behind it. Not everybody can handle the fine details. I like to study your graphics and charts. I pause for them. But I can because I've been flying for 50 years, and when I go to court on almost a daily basis, judges ask me questions about the latest crashes because they know I love aviation. I give them the facts based on your videos. The judges think I'm an aviation genius. Little do they know I'm not, but you and your staff really are and you and Mentour deserve a lot of the credit.
@shenandoahhills72635 жыл бұрын
Of course you are referring to the 100's of "staff personnel" working at the Blancolirio headquarters:)
@daffidavit5 жыл бұрын
@@shenandoahhills7263 No, all of us know Juan has thousands and thousands of staff assisting him. Why would you believe he only has "100's"?
@shenandoahhills72635 жыл бұрын
@@daffidavit That's not counting the script writers, the make up crew, hair dressers, lighting, sound crew, and his tailor.
@daffidavit5 жыл бұрын
@@shenandoahhills7263 Oh, yes, now I see what you mean. Especially all of the lighting crew that assist him while he's driving his dirt bike alongside the edge of the mountain. Those crew must be paid extra for being there at those most dangerous moments.
@Zany4God5 жыл бұрын
Oh, thank you for this second vlog on the fuel dump incident. Always informative.
@cesarquintana90345 жыл бұрын
Juan, Thank you for your great videos, full of facts. It's a pleasure .
@leebarnes6555 жыл бұрын
Stay out of the national news when you can. Very good advice had me laughing pretty good. The new measure of success, I've done pretty good for myself so far.
@bobberceli68745 жыл бұрын
Juan, Most excellent as always! And double thumbs up for Mentour to recommend your channel. Bob
@ronaldkarp40355 жыл бұрын
This is some of the most interesting content I've ever found on utube. Thanks for doing what you do !
@blackhawks81H5 жыл бұрын
Another great video Juan. I just found out from my uncle that he's flown with you before. Small world. Keep up the good work.
@rjeff7535 жыл бұрын
Another great informative and well thought out report. I have learned so much watching your reports and normally help point me in a good direction in furthering my knowledge of aviation. Thanks Juan.
@artnickel16645 жыл бұрын
I like your stressing “in the touchdown zone” and will forever remember the ditty “nothing is worth less than the altitude above or the runway behind” when getting my private ticket.
@mytmousemalibu5 жыл бұрын
Great coverage as always Juan! Thanks for throwing a plug for my friend AgentJayZ. Both of you guys are fantastic and do an excellent job at demonstrating your expertise and chopping it into nuggets of info anyone can understand! Im in the industry, I'm an A&P and active jet mechanic. I still love your content!
@6058jeremysmith5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining these procedures, I really appreciate you taking the time ...
@dheyes8035 жыл бұрын
Hello Juan, I just watched Petter from Mentour Pilot and he gave you and VAS Aviation some well deserved recognition. If you and he can collaborate on a video, that would be great. Even for those of us who are not pilots, these channels are very much appreciated. Safe skies to you.
@andysimms18025 жыл бұрын
Lt 'Kablam' Pete, he knows his onions! Great report once again Juan, thank you.
@JasVmitten5 жыл бұрын
so, compressor stall issues aside, they didn't need to dump, and when they did, 1) it didn't make any difference since they didn't have enough time to dump a sufficient amount, and 2) what they did manage to dump, unnecessarily, was done out of protocol
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
yep.
@tonydarrington67415 жыл бұрын
@@blancolirio As a former FE, my take is that initially they were over water and at about 8000 ft, a pretty good position for a dump. Probably the 3rd pilot initiated the dump, assuming they would do at least a few turns in holding to clean up checklists and prepare for return. The captain initiated an immediate return and while trying to coordinate with atc, clean up checklists, and deal with the emergency they forgot the fuel was dumping. Oops.
@JasVmitten5 жыл бұрын
@@tonydarrington6741 The CVR may be a lot more interesting than the communication with ATC
@Garth20115 жыл бұрын
Based on this video, these pilots should have simply landed heavy without dumping fuel. They didn't have a full passenger list so that itself lightened the weights some. However, I'd think the best practice would have been to maintain 8,000 ft and dump 20 minutes of fuel then land but they appeared to head for the airport in a rush leaving them with little time to manage their concerns.
@Garth20115 жыл бұрын
@@tonydarrington6741 Based on their response to ATC twice saying No, we do not need to dump fuel, I'd say they didn't begin that soon. My guess is they started to do so after they got to the right turn and 4,000 feet.
@JeffCowan5 жыл бұрын
AgentJayZ's channel is amazing. So informative.
@drenk75 жыл бұрын
A great report with excellent technical information. I hope you are close to regaining your medical 👍
@asteward55865 жыл бұрын
Great video sir. I fly the 737 BBJ aircraft as well as the G650. Seems the fuel system on the triple is quite similar to that of the 73-of course with out the fuel jettison system. Many thanks for all you do!
@thompsonjerry34125 жыл бұрын
Moral of the story, never take a dump without permission.
@ronaldpiper48125 жыл бұрын
And hopefully if you need to do it. Not RASHING into L.A . Take The spanking for it take it. And be thankful all safe
@cratxn15 жыл бұрын
Sierra Hotel...If it had only been over San Fran it would have mixed right in the homeless "dump" on the streets and no one would have noticed
@jwb28145 жыл бұрын
Thompson Jerry Now that was nice.
@afcgeo8825 жыл бұрын
Or at least notify your controller when you do and tell them how it comes out.
@jennydiazvigneault55485 жыл бұрын
I just successfully completed a big dump too.
@georgebrewer51165 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the update. Been out of maintenance for awhile. Passed on some bad info to some folks about fuel dumping. Now, I'll have a chance to apologize and recommend they watch your videos and those you recommended.
@gravitymediapro5 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy and appreciate your videos, and learn a lot about an industry where I know very little. Thank you for your teaching efforts.
@art.demirjian97215 жыл бұрын
Very educational video! It helps me to learn the enormous responsibility which pilots they have on their shoulders once they are in the air, also during emergency procedures with significantly damaging consequences for mishandling the proper action. It is not easy to be a pilot, for having very demanding pressure to do things the right way with "Zero Tolerance".
@richschindler87315 жыл бұрын
Ive only had to dump fuel once. I was flying a BAC 1-11-400, (corporate) out of PSP when we had a hydraulic failure. We elected to stay within the valley rather than flying over to LAX. We climbed to about 8000 feet and were directed out towards the unpopulated / desert area before being allowed to dump fuel. We dumped the amount of fuel needed to bring us within the allowable landing weight. Came back and landed without incident. So to hear this story I have to wonder, who did what when??
@wbball155 жыл бұрын
Lt Pete -8 had quite the cameo. Thanks for sharing.
@garymartin97775 жыл бұрын
The exact language of the ATC inquiry as heard by the pilot might become relevant. I've read this was the question: “OK, so you don’t need to hold to dump fuel or anything like that?” and I've seen 'or dump' in place of 'to dump'. It makes a difference. The reply was "negative". The pilot might have been correct in that he didn't need to hold to dump fuel because he intended to dump on the way in. That wouldn't be good practice but note that FAA regs permit a pilot with a declared emergency to deviate from any reg at his/her discretion in order to get he plane safely landed.
@kenmunn44215 жыл бұрын
Once again Juan, great job. You can teach ground school for me any time. This almost sounds like a sim session. During the debrief, I would have asked for a complete explanation on the dumping that took place. Back in the days when we used to video tape sim session, I think this one would have been a classic . Maybe a 3 hour debriefing. Also, like your use of the UMX Radian to demonstrate wing bending. Great back yard soaring machine. Keep the videos coming.
@yellowdogadventures5 жыл бұрын
yet another straightforward no bullshit explanation ! Thanks Juan.
@danisbell60405 жыл бұрын
Another excellent presentation, Juan. Very informative and I really appreciate and enjoy your channel!
@mannypuerta50865 жыл бұрын
The other consideration for whether to dump or not on a four engine airplane is the possibility of losing a second engine on the same side due to damage resulting from the adjacent failed engine. If one had to do a go around with two engines out, one would want to be at a weight that would safely permit that to happen. This was a concern on the older 747-100, especially on a hot day. That, perhaps, is part of the historic mentality you mentioned with regard to dumping to MLW. Of course, whether to dump or not is at the captain’s discretion based on the current issue, but whatever is determined better be the right course of action...unlike this Delta flight. It’s really hard to imagine any justification at this point for what that captain chose to do. Given that this was a 777 from LA to Shanghai, there would be one or two extra crew members onboard. I find it astounding that between the three or four of them that they dumped fuel where they did after being asked by ATC if fuel dump was required and replying, “no”.
@divingfe5 жыл бұрын
Thank you ,Manny, for clarifying how a "real", HEAVY, airplane is operated, rather than these "light twins. :-)))). F/E, Mike Jaureguy- PAC.
@tiredoldmechanic17915 жыл бұрын
The 777 is a twin engine airplane. According to a quick search, it can fly for 3 hours and 1300 miles on one engine. I don't understand the urgency to land if only one engine had a problem and they were able to stop the compressor stall. The investigation should be interesting.
@mannypuerta50865 жыл бұрын
divingfe Hi, Mike. Long time, no see.
@mannypuerta50865 жыл бұрын
HiWetcam Not sure I understand the question.
@saintchuck98575 жыл бұрын
@@tiredoldmechanic1791 3 hours/1300 miles or until the other engine fails.
@p1epoppa5 жыл бұрын
Really admire this brother's style of explanation
@peruseperusing50275 жыл бұрын
Another great clip Juan! The findings/results of this investigation will be interesting to see. Hey Lt Pete................. Ka blammo!!!! :)
@duckbow5 жыл бұрын
Juan -- your channel is growing like crazy! Great work, please keep it up. Always great commentary.
@ccserfas46295 жыл бұрын
That's the "one objective"? LOL at that one. Great stuff Juan.
@michaelray74855 жыл бұрын
I went and watched your recommended video on compressor stalls and it was very enlightening. Mr. Brown I would consider it an honor and a pleasure to meet you in person some day. That may never happen, but I will continue to watch your high quality videos. Keep up the good work and God bless!
@iknewbetter5 жыл бұрын
Great video and explains a lot of what went on. I am guessing somebody forgot they were dumping fuel. You do great work!!!!!
@gordonegan39245 жыл бұрын
And forgot to tell ATC that they were dumping fuel.
@scottiniowa15 жыл бұрын
Blancolirio World Headquarters - love it! Great job as always - thank you!!
@omma-llama78605 жыл бұрын
Juan, for the partial ads, try experimenting by uploading the video with limited tags and then go back and add your description one paragraph/ keyword at a time. My understanding is if the algorithm does not like something in your standard script or keyword tags, it will limit you. For the ads with limited ads already, try removing a few tags or sentences on old videos to narrow it down. IT could just be a simple word change to fix this. but, fwiw, i see plenty of ads when watching your videos. So they are showing. Cheers.
@Poppi20065 жыл бұрын
OMMA- LLAMA Yet, I see no ads on this channel. Also, on other channels, I see the tags but am offered no ads. I’ve been curious for a long time.
@glenmartin24375 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Things are more complicated than I thought.
@Kevin_7475 жыл бұрын
Some crew is going to get to sit at that long table where they are the only ones not supplied with a bottle of water. Glad I'm not that captain. Not sure what Delta's QRH looks like but all the ones I'm familiar with have a prompt to take you to the fuel jettison check list on engine shut down check list. Thanks for the update. Its been painful watching what the main stream media is saying. All the slip and fall lawyers are lining up.
@fucqtheworld5 жыл бұрын
Well, it just wasn't "school kids" who got a Jet A shower. The jet dragged the stream for a couple miles. Do you want your car covered in that greasy stuff?
@Kevin_7475 жыл бұрын
@@fucqtheworld I'm sure there was a strong odor of fuel but I doubt if anybody's hair got wet with jet fuel. It was more than a couple of miles. Are you with CNN?
@nodttiurp5 жыл бұрын
@@Kevin_747 So, you're defending their dumping of the fuel?
@Kevin_7475 жыл бұрын
@@nodttiurp No. Are you?
@TyphoonVstrom5 жыл бұрын
It's kerosene. Well atomised as it was, it wouldn't have hung around more than a few minutes before evaporating completely. Those kids and parents would have far more exposure issues merely going to school every day under a flight path...
@oldhick90475 жыл бұрын
Love"stay out of the National news". Thank you once again for the best reporting of it's kind.
@rubbadubdub78575 жыл бұрын
Lt. Pete looks pretty special. You are blessed.
@debbz5755 жыл бұрын
Hi Juan good to see more snow. I was up there on new years and there wasn’t enough snow for the kings beach snow park.
@ReflectedMiles5 жыл бұрын
Juan, i think one of the more significant concerns here may come from the ATC side in not being advised of the fuel dumping, and even being told "no" when they asked about it. not just because of fuel reaching the ground or as a communications issue but because there is a legal change in requirements for them, particularly being in approach-control airspace. 7110.65 Ch. 9 Sec. 4, 9-4-4 specifies that separation criteria from an aircraft dumping fuel changes to 1,000 feet above, 2,000 feet below, or 5 miles radar / laterally, and even VFR aircraft must be kept at least 5 miles away. ATC is also required to broadcast to other aircraft that dumping is in progress. It's second-nature for a controller to give an emergency aircraft a wider berth anyway, but if the investigation discovers a violation of those separation criteria in the downwind to 25R or wherever during this event, that will open another can of worms where the crew is basically responsible for causing a separation error with the failure to report the dumping.
@shenandoahhills72635 жыл бұрын
In an emergency the Captain has fairly wide latitude to make judgments as to the safety of his aircraft and crew. Fortunately no one on the ground was seriously injured. You will note in the pictures of the fuel being dumped that the fuel almost immediately starts to vaporize as it is coming out of the dump nozzles. AT 2500 feet agl the fuel will not likely totally dissipate prior to reaching the surface, but will be more like a fine mist. Reading the news reports you would think that the aircraft was pouring a liquid stream on the ground. The first priority is getting the aircraft, crew, and passengers safely on the ground. Mission accomplished!
@nodttiurp5 жыл бұрын
@@shenandoahhills7263 Why would the safety of the aircraft and crew be in danger? How would he know that "no one on the ground was seriously injured?
@shenandoahhills72635 жыл бұрын
@@nodttiurp We don't know the full extent of the emergency, or why the Captain's concern was to return for landing expeditiously. There was another incident a while back where an El-Al Boeing 747 cargo jet lost two engines shortly after take off. The Captain decided to proceed out over a lake to dump fuel prior to returning to land. After dumping their fuel they did not make it back to the airport, killing over 100 people on the ground. In this situation, the crew likely was concerned that the engine malfunction might have not been isolated to the one engine, as in the case of fuel contamination. There have been cases such as Eastern Airlines flight 855 out of Miami, where one engine after another on a Lockheed L1011 lost all 3 engines. Fortunately they were able to restart one engine and barely made it back to the airport. This is not the time to screw around, get the aircraft back on the ground safely, if you have to answer a few questions, so be it, but everyone was safe to live another day.
@ericlopkoff5 жыл бұрын
Reflected Miles FAR 91.3 does not relieve the pilot from gross negligence.
@davidchamberlain48615 жыл бұрын
@@shenandoahhills7263 Then why dump at all? It was apparent from the first and IMO most significant part of this video that it wasn't necessary.
@pamelaarescurrinaga82015 жыл бұрын
Pleased to have this follow-up. Thank you. I look forward to further information.
@benjaminnevins52115 жыл бұрын
Isn't LA right next to the ocean? The 777 I had power to spare too right? I can't imagine any reason to dump it over LA.
@theoldman88775 жыл бұрын
LA is the only place I can think of where nothing of value exists. Lollollol.
@airgliderz5 жыл бұрын
You mean anywhere over any coastal city in CA
@t.w.35 жыл бұрын
Structural problem or big flight control issues would require fuel jettison (dumping) IMHO. Great video as always Juan. Two thumbs up! :)
@henrys.68645 жыл бұрын
I like the old F-111 "dump and burn". There's video on that at airshows here on yt. Aussies did it a lot at their airshows.
@noshsreqd5 жыл бұрын
I was just pondering that very idea, would be a very effective and logical way to eliminate the dispersal concerns of fuel jettison especially in a scenario such as this one. Would certainly look spectacular although scary for passengers and ground witnesses who didn't understand what was happening. I'm sure it could be possible with the necessary ignition apparatus though it would probably come down to the cost of such a system that would determine the viability.
@n6mz5 жыл бұрын
Good data on the 767 landing weight. Fantastic a/c, the former chief test pilot for the 767 is a good friend of mine, I wish I could make every commercial flight in one of them.
@bw1625 жыл бұрын
Good landing is one you can walk away from. A great landing is one where you can use the plane again.
@afcgeo8825 жыл бұрын
Unless others can’t walk away from your landing.
@leanderfernandes23395 жыл бұрын
Joined your Channel as recommended by Mentour in his video. Very nice explanation. I would assume subscriber increase in these few days. All the best and we are here to support.
@AureliusR5 жыл бұрын
Oh wow, I just finished part 1 and then suddenly part 2 is upload. Hells yeah. New sub here!
@joelzimmerman24625 жыл бұрын
Juan, only fly the 767-300-ER-W. Can't dump center fuel below MLDG. Subsequently, if we have to return, we have to work with dispatch, as long as we're not on fire! So, your explanation is ENTIRELY accurate! Good job trying to explain the complexities of an emergency situation.
@poisonousnut5 жыл бұрын
can you give us a video on your scariest landing or flight where you were in the cockpit?
@packer4925 жыл бұрын
Awesome video thank you for the information as usual. Your work is much appreciated
@zorgatron89985 жыл бұрын
Hey Juan, you got a shout out from Mentour!
@user-qr8ki8ue4i5 жыл бұрын
They're both consummate pros.
@johnpalgrave69984 жыл бұрын
What a good commentator - so comprehensive and still succinct. ...
@timothypirnat37545 жыл бұрын
Always great reporting Juan! Us non-aviation folks can pick up what you're laying down. I know what Jet-A is, however some of your viewers may not know about exposure to liquid and fumes. Has anybody covered this? I have a diesel farm tractor and have had exposure to the fuel liquid and vapor for years with no ill effects. I know Jet-A is kerosene, a slightly lighter distillate than diesel, but with similar chemistry.
@dalehamlin73835 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the SwissAir crash in Nova Scotia.. The flight travelled over the ocean to dump fuel and thus never made it to the airport. Sad memories from days gone by.... Although not a pleasant experience for anyone on the ground, at least no lives were lost. I think this is the preferable scenario. Thanks for your great channel....!
@UNITED38Heavy5 жыл бұрын
This is very interesting. What’s even more interesting is that the crew said they weren’t “critical” as far as emergencies go, so it could be fair to assume that they could’ve made the decision to dump fuel over the pacific at a safe altitude. But assuming isn’t good in any situation, I look forward to learning more as this situation progresses. Happy everyone was safe.
@watchgoose5 жыл бұрын
a lot of the comments on this incident on the VASaviation video were pretty bad. I was surprised.
@777Outrigger5 жыл бұрын
I flew the B-777-200LR from LAX to SYD a lot in my years just before retirement. The numbers for the 200LR were 766,000 lbs Max Takeoff and 492,000 Max Landing Weight. If I lost an engine right after, or during takeoff, my plan was to come back to LAX as fast as possible and dump fuel most of the way back. So I would be dumping fuel below 5,000', probably at least down to 2,500' on downwind. In my briefing before take off I would tell the RP to stop the dumping on base leg if we forgot about it. My guestimate was that, in the time it took to fly outbound RWH from LAX, get stable, and turn around as soon as possible, go downwind, base, final, and land, I could dump about 60,000 lbs of fuel. We often took off near Max Takeoff Weight of 766,000 lbs on SYD flights, so my weight on landing would be near 700,000 lbs, well above the Max Landing Weight of 492,000 lbs. I never flew the L-1011 or the MD-11, so no ancestor worship from me. ..... So this could have been me. Thankfully it wasn't. And these guys did not say they didn't need to dump, but rather they didn't need to go to a designated area to dump. They needed to get on the ground fast, and get their weight down. The bad engine was still providing electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic, but not much thrust. Basically, to understand my plan. (1) Get on the ground fairly quickly (2) get rid of weight as fast as possible.... So, no-go to area to dump, and probably dumping below 3,000'.
@stevet81215 жыл бұрын
A separate check list for a major KABLAMMO landing?
@linchester84645 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@blancolirio5 жыл бұрын
Yep! (I learned the hard way on that one...).
@georgecheso5 жыл бұрын
@@blancolirio I would like to hear more about some of your "Oh Crap!" Moments! We've all got them, no matter what we do for a living, you just have my curiosity peaked😉 Thanks for all of the awesome work you do, been a long term subscriber.
@duanequam77095 жыл бұрын
Great presentation. I understand that there are other channels explaining compresser stall but I personally would like to hear it from your piloting experience.
@QALibrary5 жыл бұрын
what trouble and how much trouble will the crew be in from doing this?
@lostmic5 жыл бұрын
Have you ever seen the movie "Sully" they tried to nail him to the cross... and he saved everyone on board. Anytime you cost money in my opinion by dumping fuel over LA, they will bring out a big giant hammer with the tiniest nails.... lol
@afcgeo8825 жыл бұрын
It all depends on what the investigation uncovers.
@CBLounge21125 жыл бұрын
70mph winds and 6-8 inches of Sierra Cement over here in Carson City!!