Thanks for all you do Tim, you are a blessing to C# developers and software engineers in general
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
I’m glad my content has been so helpful.
@nosaanthony731010 ай бұрын
I always love your approach and simplicity. My friends are tired of me because of how I advocate for your contents 😂
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@user-lk1hg9ev5uАй бұрын
Appreciate you explaining every detail and piece of code you write even if its out of the main video's topic, that helps us learn more than what we are here to learn! In most videos they just keep focusing on the main topic and don't realize that we can get confused by parts of the code included that we might not understand and/or lose concentration.
@IAmTimCoreyАй бұрын
I am glad it was helpful.
@VitorCosta-pb7hx8 ай бұрын
Most excellent simple and concise tutorial. Thanks
@IAmTimCorey8 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@MohdRizwan-pf3ex10 ай бұрын
"You are awesome. I am highly grateful to you. I am a developer because of you. Thank you so much for your tremendous work."
@rty36110 ай бұрын
bool isLyingInTheAboveComment = false;
@shewartshepherd112610 ай бұрын
@@rty361 that's a great one hahaha!
@MohdRizwan-pf3ex10 ай бұрын
@@rty361public class DeveloperLife { public bool GetsGoodPackage { get; set; } public bool WorksAtReputedCompany { get; set; } public bool KeepsLearning { get; set; } // Constructor sets all the properties to true by default. public DeveloperLife() { GetsGoodPackage = true; WorksAtReputedCompany = true; KeepsLearning = true; } // Method to check if the developer is lying about their success. public bool IsLyingInTheAboveComment() { // If all conditions are true, then not lying; otherwise, lying. return !(GetsGoodPackage && WorksAtReputedCompany && KeepsLearning); } }
@rty36110 ай бұрын
@@MohdRizwan-pf3ex I love this😂
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You're very welcome!
@AlexanderBelikov10 ай бұрын
The issue I faced was the app pool will be stopped if there were no incomming requests for some time. The background tasks will also stop in this case. I tried to fix it on a app pool settings level but gave up and hosted my background workers under win service. Is there a good way to keep the app always on?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Yes, there is. I’ll do a video on it when I can.
@clebersondot-net10 ай бұрын
Thank you, Tim! It's what i've been looking for
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@webluke10 ай бұрын
That's super handy to have built right into ASP.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
It really is.
@sigma56110 ай бұрын
Great, what is the extension are you using to implement suggestions please?
@camelpilot2 ай бұрын
Any particular reason why we would use HostedService over the newer BackgroundService?
@IAmTimCoreyАй бұрын
I wanted the ability to start and stop rather than just the execute.
@bmiller94910 ай бұрын
I like ingesting these skills in small bites like this.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
I'm glad.
@MrFalcon5819910 ай бұрын
Is there any significant difference between creating a background job like this vs. adding a Worker Service to the solution besides not having to create a separate project?
@Pro-sj1kh6 ай бұрын
the best never rest thank you Corey
@IAmTimCorey6 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@pricenetSA10 ай бұрын
What will happen if there are no active sessions for a period of time in IIS? There would be no instances running. How would the background task run? I tried using Coravel a while ago to run scheduled tasks. It stopped running everytime there were no active instances.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
This is an IIS configuration setting. You can have it keep the website live all the time. But yes, if you have IIS set up to conserve resources when they aren't used, your site will be turned off when not used.
@danielgochin370310 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey Thanks for the explanation!
@andyhb197010 ай бұрын
Or like me I was using Azure App Service and had no control at the service level I was targeting
@andyhb197010 ай бұрын
I assume with any background job technology Hangfire, Quartz, Hosted Service etc. if the IIS process isnt running then neither is your job. I used Quartz fairly recently and the job just wasnt running until i visited a page to trigger the process. Ultimate ly I abandoned it and refactored everything into a Windows Service.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
That’s just a setting in IIS. Change it and your site will continue to run.
@ellersontorres2037Ай бұрын
Good evening You created it using the web api project. Could it also be created using the worker service template? Is there a difference to this example? What do you recommend?
@IAmTimCorey28 күн бұрын
The API project allows you to have a front-end as well. You can definitely do just the background job using a worker service instead. It all depends on what your project needs are.
@phoenixishere10 ай бұрын
can we just trigger this service manually just like we do for an azure function? Say i want to enqueue a job every time a logic runs ! , i can write the logic in IHostedService implementation but triggering it manually though !
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t that just be an API endpoint? Or a method? I don’t think you need a service for that.
@rospy710 ай бұрын
if you want to trigger a background service from the UI, then you should provide an endpoint to the user that creates some kind of "initiation request" record that is persisted in a database or a thread safe repository (memory cache, concurrent bag as in the example, disk, etc). Then your background service would check periodically among the collection of requests for the ones that haven't been picked already picked up and execute them. If you also want to report the progress of the job to the end user, you would provide a second endpoint that polls for the job with the id that is returned from your first method. At least that's one way to accomplish this
@phoenixishere10 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey well what if its a long running process which may exceeds gateway timeout.... i can have 2 endpoints 1 to trigger the background job and one to poll the status of the job
@lyudmilpetrov946110 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for knowledge sharing and God bless you and your family
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@leknyzma10 ай бұрын
why are you not using PeriodicTimer ?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Timer is easy, quick, and works for the situation. The specific code you use will depend on your scenario.
@vamvdotnet10 ай бұрын
Would the PeriodicTimer class work great for this use case as well?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Yep.
@ТимурДегтярев-х3к8 ай бұрын
Dear Tim, I have a question regarding hosted services. What if I need the service run indefinetely in the background (i.e. receiving some data via TCP) but I need to be able to change some fields in the data saved like add timestamp or some additional info? Should I use hosted service for TCP reader as well?
@miguelynancy105 ай бұрын
Hi, thanks for the video, I was implementing a background service with IHostedService to send emails but it is sending 3 the email times when I deploy it to a webapp in azure it is because the webapp has 3 instance is there a way to send it only 1?
@IAmTimCorey5 ай бұрын
Yes, if you run three instances of the background service and don't account for that in your code, you will have this issue. Instead, what you need to do is have a locking mechanism in your code so that only one instance handles any one request. Otherwise, you aren't actually spreading out the work, you are just duplicating the work. There is no need to have three instances if they are all doing the same thing. You need to write the code so that each does a different set of work.
10 ай бұрын
Hi, I tried to implement it on a MVC project, but I need to inject DB Context and when I do so, it returns a error: Some services are not able to be constructed (Error while validating the service descriptor 'ServiceType: Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.IHostedService Lifetime: Singleton ImplementationType: MyProj.Services.MyBackgroundThing': Cannot consume scoped service 'MyProj.Data.ApplicationDbContext' from singleton 'Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.IHostedService'.)' How do I fix that?
10 ай бұрын
Well, if anyone have the same problem, that's how I solved it: inected private readonly IServiceScopeFactory _scopeFactory; on the constructor On the method: using (var scope = _scopeFactory.CreateScope()){ var someList = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService(); // call whatever you want SINCHRONESLY. // ASYNC methods won't work. } If anyone have a better solution, please let me know. This stuff is quite usefull!!
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You need to match type lifetimes. So your background service is a singleton. A singleton cannot consume a scoped service, because that will expose one scope to everyone. That's a function of how dependency injection works.
10 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey Thank you for your response, but how do I fix this? Can't I access database from my background services? I solved by inectinig IServiceScopeFactory into my background service class, but it doesn't allow async methods when I call my DbContext... is there a better solution?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Here is some direction on how to do it well: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/extensions/scoped-service
@davidmontilla64667 ай бұрын
Great video Tim , but when you deploy a web api with a background service, this service it will not start until some endpoint on the api is hit, is this normal behavior for hostedServices?
@IAmTimCorey7 ай бұрын
An API (or any website, really) should be accessed right after deployment to initialize everything. Otherwise, it will conserve resources and wait for the first caller to set things up. It can take a while for that first call to finish processing everything. Instead, run it right after deployment to get everything warmed up. This will also kick off your background job.
@null-qk8si10 ай бұрын
what if i want to run a single task in the back ground when an specific Api is called i tried Task.Run(()=>task(data)) inside the api but it breaks when using an ef query inside task(data)
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You need to make sure that you are matching the dependency lifetime values (singletons cannot directly consume scoped services like EF). There is a commend under this video that asks about it and I explain how it works and how you can use EF in a background service.
@null-qk8si10 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey thnx for the replay I used Services.AddDbContextFactory in the program file this made my last Fire and Forget code works dose using _contextFactory.CreateDbContext(); have an drawbacks ?
@rajkumararora736610 ай бұрын
Great work. Thanks for sharing!
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@S3Kglitches10 ай бұрын
How to in MAUI? Need reliable background GPS scanning.
@harrisonwell1719Ай бұрын
Do you recommend using hangfire?
@IAmTimCoreyАй бұрын
I definitely do.
@loveandlike674710 ай бұрын
Thanks , I have a question I’m just graduated from a boot camp with C sharp css html JavaScript but I don’t know how to create projects, if you please give me recommendations or guidance, I would really appreciate it ?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
My recommendation is to build small things. You need LOTS of practice actually building what you learn. Here is a video explaining more: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJrMmH1vg9x9aNEsi=CxLVka7hnAd-wkYi
@Ny_babs10 ай бұрын
Tim, I have a video idea. I'm training a new hire, and they asked me a good question I think other could benefit from. The long and short of it is F12. How to look into a class to see the available methods, and how to look at what the returns look like i.e. node, and the overload options without doing the hover and up down arrows when you hover over a method. And I've always wondered why there is a .ToString(), but there isn't a .ToInt32(). Why do I have to use Convert.ToInt32... go
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. Please add it to the list on the suggestion site so others can vote on it as well: suggestions.iamtimcorey.com/
@Joooooooooooosh10 ай бұрын
Because everything can be converted to a string, whereas only certain values can be converted to Int32. Doesn't make sense as an instance method.
@Ny_babs10 ай бұрын
@JoshEinstein you've never gotten a string exception? Not everything can go ToString. If you can get convert errors, and you can get string exceptions, I don't understand your comment. No disrespect.
@Joooooooooooosh10 ай бұрын
@@Ny_babs If you are getting an exception from a ToString call, it means it's written wrong. ToString is by design never supposed to throw.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
To follow up here, everything derives from object. Object includes a ToString() method. Everything should be able to output a valid string. If it does not, some developer made a bad mistake.
@andywalter742610 ай бұрын
One question I have is I noticed when you used idisposable, there is always a weird warning that i saw you ignored. I always have it supressed. Do you know what can be done so a person can do IDisposable without being forced to use the IDisposable pattern.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
What "weird warning"? Can you give me a time code and the message? As for your last sentence, I'm not sure what that means. Do you not want to use the interface but want the benefits of the interface? If so then no, that won't work.
@andywalter742610 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey If you mouse over the dispose method it gives the message saying ""Change {class{}.Dispose() to call GC.SuppressFinalize(object). This will prevent derived types that introduce a finalizer from needing to re-implement 'IDisposable' to call it. I was hoping to have a way so that warning won't keep happening everytime you implement the IDisposable. The only case that does not happen is if you use the option that autogenerates the code for following the IDisposable pattern.
@anandshukla507110 ай бұрын
Timer doesn't wait for the existing task to finish before starting another task right....so if we are making any db work and the work we are doing is taking time and mean while timer starts another same task so kind of locking database right
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Correct. If you are going to have jobs that last longer than your interval, and that is a problem, either extend your interval or turn off the timer while the job runs and then start it when the job is over.
@VishalTrivediB4 ай бұрын
Excellent video as always, thanks Tim! Question: What is the best way, in your opinion, to trigger a user initiated background task, for e.g. from a web page?
@IAmTimCorey4 ай бұрын
I think an easy way is to have the user add something to the database table that acts as a queue. Then the background task can pick it up and process it when it has time.
@VishalTrivediB4 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey Thank you, that's a great tip.
@SagharMax10 ай бұрын
It is perfect and helpful. Thank you for this.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@joebananas1010 ай бұрын
Would this approach be good for maintaining data in combo-boxes? e.g. Imagine an application that has a bunch of combo-boxes on a page and instead of each user's instances having to hit the database every-time the page is loaded, could this be used to maintain cached versions of those lists, which are updated regularly or on demand regardless of the user landing on the page. Or is there a better way to accomplish that type of updating?
@MuhammadYousaf-wp6wj10 ай бұрын
I am facing similar situation like you.. waiting for the reply.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
This runs server-side, but yes. You could ping for new data often, and the system could always pull from the cache (which is refreshed on a schedule). That way, the database only gets hit on cache refresh, regardless of how many times the clients call for new data. However, there is still going to be calls from the client to the server in this model. If you want this to happen inside the page in the background, you would need to write something to refresh dropdowns based upon a client-side timer.
@joebananas1010 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey thanks for that. i'm maintaining an older app written by other developers that has exactly this, a page with a bunch of combo-boxes and every time the user lands on the page there's a separate DB hit for every combo-box. The data in the CB's is rarely updated so the lists are effectively static. i might rather have the CBs filled with a cache on the server rather than another hit to the DB. then only update the cache when the list maintenance screens are utilized. now that i'm writing this, it may be overly complicated for no real benefit but still, DB hits are expensive in terms of performance.
@milemihailov110 ай бұрын
Hi Tim, great video. I have a question is it possible to do the same on Blazor Server App?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Yes, you can.
@10Totti10 ай бұрын
Nice tutorial thanks!
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@cakdham460710 ай бұрын
How to run hundred background jobs in precision periode of time. Example every 10ms. Thanks.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You probably want to consider Hangfire.
@HunterShenep7 ай бұрын
Your email stuff is broken. Tried to send code to my gmail and icloud. Nothing after a day
@IAmTimCorey6 ай бұрын
I'm at a conference right now, but I am working on it.
@StanleyUkweze10 ай бұрын
Thank you Tim
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@parsalotfy3 ай бұрын
thank you for your great video
@IAmTimCorey3 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@bentslattsveen220810 ай бұрын
Nice video👍 How would you start multiple jobs of the same type, but you don’t know how many before you start and read from a source, config of some sort (database)?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
The background jobs have access to Dependency Injection just like everything else, so if you need to read from the database or a configuration, you can pass in those dependencies and call them.
@bentslattsveen220810 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey Sorry, my question was not clear. My question wasn’t about if or how to get access to db, but how to dynamically in code create x instances/numbers of background jobs. When you have read the db, you know how many. Something like a bootstrapper
10 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey I did and I had the scope error mentioned above... I couldn't inject dbcontext into the service class. IHostedServices is singleton and DbContext is scopped
@AlexxXRecorD9 ай бұрын
Nice, thanks so much! Very interesting.
@IAmTimCorey9 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@mohammedelsuissey174510 ай бұрын
I know this is just for training purposes, however there was no need to dispose the timer in a dispose method, you could just dispose it in the stop method as you create a new instance in the start method. Great material though, thanks.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
There actually is a need. If the application crashes, the stop won't be called but the dispose will be called. This way, it gets properly closed down no matter what.
@mohammedelsuissey174510 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey Good peice of knowledge here, thanks.
@GaryJohnWalker110 ай бұрын
Maybe cover Hangfire (and then Quartz!) in the nearish future?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. You can post it on suggestions.iamtimcorey.com so that others can upvote it.
@leroyvan735710 ай бұрын
please could you do tutorial on hangfire ?
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. Please add it to the list on the suggestion site so others can vote on it as well: suggestions.iamtimcorey.com/
@leroyvan735710 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey OKay
@dineshyd6 ай бұрын
good explanation
@IAmTimCorey6 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@DoYourForm10 ай бұрын
Timer uses separate thread, so it breaks DI container and EF will not work (can't use already existing context). No way to use the video to access the database, agree with @AndreSilveira1.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
The code inside the background service is to demonstrate how you could use it. You get to choose what code to put in there. You can absolutely access data access from a background service. I even posted a link on how to do that in the other comment thread.
@carlos.maradiaga10 ай бұрын
Excellent. I will use this approach to return the amount sent by the user from their account to another destination account at another bank or financial institution and the transaction failed for whatever reason. Therefore, the process of returning the amount to the original account will be automatic, since there will be a process running in the background verifying the result of the transfer.
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Great!
@louiseeggleton742010 ай бұрын
I'd probably use something like Hangfire for that since there is tracking and failover.
@salimanahmad53529 ай бұрын
Awesome. but how to handle errors
@IAmTimCorey9 ай бұрын
The same way you handle errors anywhere else.
@salimanahmad53529 ай бұрын
@@IAmTimCorey thanks
@leroyvan735710 ай бұрын
thanks you
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
You are welcome.
@gowthamkarukola280310 ай бұрын
very good
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@АлексейОрёл-к3у10 ай бұрын
If anyone is using Timer, I want to warn you that when deploying an application on linux the Timer class will not work correctly, Timer will only run once. It took me a long time to find this bug!!!
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@awmy310910 ай бұрын
Why is that the case? Are you sure you don't have system time configuration issues?
@Joooooooooooosh10 ай бұрын
@@awmy3109Yeah I'm not buying it. That would be a pretty glaring, show stopping bug.
@АлексейОрёл-к3у10 ай бұрын
nope@@awmy3109
@akshayrajgollahalli10 ай бұрын
Is there a bug ticket for this?
@jan53109 ай бұрын
I can highly recommend Quartz
@IAmTimCorey9 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@muttBunch10 ай бұрын
I need C# rehab. I have a bad habit of caching EVERYTHING! ❤
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
👍
@gowthamkarukola280310 ай бұрын
good
@IAmTimCorey10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@leozt998 ай бұрын
Always those same trivial examples for no use cases
@IAmTimCorey8 ай бұрын
The point isn't to build a working app for you to just copy and paste. The point is to show you how to use the technology. Then you figure out when it might be useful to you to implement the technology in your application. In this case, though, I also gave you verbally a number of times when you might use this particular technology, such as for refreshing caches, etc.