We are getting GTA VI before The Boeing 777x even gets certified.
@Ahr_Geo2 ай бұрын
For real bro
@kfl162 ай бұрын
If this actually happens it’ll be so embarrassing
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
It wont its just sarcasm @@kfl16
@kfl162 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 nah it actually can cause gta 6 is coming out fall 2025 if no delays
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@kfl16 I've not seen it advertised to come out next year
@Ahr_Geo2 ай бұрын
Previous video - Good new gor Boeing This video - Terrible news for Boeing What a rollercoaster lol
@SamSydPhotography2 ай бұрын
And before the good news it was bad news 😂
@Ahr_Geo2 ай бұрын
@@SamSydPhotography yes, exactly lol
@stevieboy3662 ай бұрын
Future update, the 777x enters into service in 2033.
@l3v1ckUK2 ай бұрын
Right about the same time an A350 neo enters service.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
Prove it
@swanvictor8872 ай бұрын
@@l3v1ckUK the A370 lol....
@kevinp81082 ай бұрын
By then, we will have space-planes that can fly from New York to Tokyo in two hours!
@harryaudia62 ай бұрын
@@kevinp8108 As long as it's not boeing manufactured................look at the poor spaceliner astronauts marooned at the ISS.
@alwaleedalthani96242 ай бұрын
Let’s confirm a new 10 yers extension to all A380-800 yeah
@SFAvgeek2 ай бұрын
And 777s
@fobita2 ай бұрын
Why not just embrace the A350-1000 really?
@pandamisha2 ай бұрын
@@fobitabecause a380's capacity vs fuel burn is unparalelled
@fobita2 ай бұрын
@@pandamisha yep. Works well for Emirates hub and spoke model. I love the speed and stability of the jumbo, but so many have been against it.
@SettiiiJetti-pj4nq2 ай бұрын
lol this actually might make airbus want to make a neo version for the a380
@thatonerandomkid-r2n2 ай бұрын
at least they arent trying to hide it
@trevorhart5452 ай бұрын
THEY CAN'T ANYM0RE.
@Luke-PlanesTrainsDogsnCars2 ай бұрын
YET
@thatonerandomkid-r2n2 ай бұрын
@@Luke-PlanesTrainsDogsnCars Boeing is under brand new (and better management) so that most likely won’t happen
@TIRCQ2 ай бұрын
@@thatonerandomkid-r2n Hummmmm
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
Well, the plane stranded a bunch of engineers and FAA staff in Hawaii, so… 😂 Plus this will result in huge delays, which must be immediately factored in for shareholders and customers counting on a specific EIS for their new planes. Impossible to hide. 🫤
@frankiecrocker2 ай бұрын
It's amazing how back in the last century, Boeing researched, designed and certified airliners, with pens and sliderules, and delivered them in a span of several years or so. Fast forward to the modern computer age, and this process can take a decade.
@Guren742 ай бұрын
Is taking more than a decade and is just an upgraded model, a design from scratch would take at least 15 years
@Ayden20082 ай бұрын
Well, at least it was on a test aircraft rather than the actual thing
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
Coming soon...
@orange80672 ай бұрын
@user-yt198 it won't happen to the actual aircraft, because if they can't solve it, it won't enter service.
@timex5132 ай бұрын
The engines will just fall off on the real thing.
@dmcr95252 ай бұрын
@@timex513 Its a failsafe design. That's why there are 2 of them on each engine. At least they didn't hide it this time.
@Msouthallvb2 ай бұрын
I think a lot of airlines will pull the orders if it doesn’t get certified by 2025. Airbus laughing at Boeing atm
@wadehiggins11142 ай бұрын
I don't blame them 😂
@Dischingo2 ай бұрын
The thing is Airbus wont be able to capitalized on this short term since their order book is already filled but if they continue on their current trajectory with the A321, A350, and A330 lineup they are looking like the right bet for any airlines.
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, Airbus' order books for narrow body a/c are full to the brim and overflowing. The wide body category is also very well selling with waiting times. What Airbus can improve is offer the A350 with more engine options than the current choice, then the wide body order books will be overflowing as well.
@ronparrish66662 ай бұрын
Lockheed could probably bring back a 2 engine L1011 by the time Boeing figures this thing out
@Dischingo2 ай бұрын
That would be awesome Lockheed back in the commercial airline business would make sure Airbus still has competition in the wide body market.
@malcolmmacdougall2 ай бұрын
@@Dischingo The Tristar was better than this anyway........ in its time i mean, this is more like the DC10 with its cargo doors falling off
@smithkenny80342 ай бұрын
structure issues could be a huge delay, especially the engine pylon
@deniermurch86932 ай бұрын
What do you expect, those are bloody big engines. Boeing tried to use parts designed for smaller engines I expect, well what do you know, it's Boeing. (satire)
@Aviationcommander2 ай бұрын
Went from good to bad in a day
@Arado_Missile2 ай бұрын
More like went from bad to worse
@slmyatt2 ай бұрын
Hell of alot better to catch in testing than service.
@Autoblox02 ай бұрын
Wow the last time I watched this channel was like 2 years ago and damn the production quality has upped up alot since then!
@xrecovery92 ай бұрын
still not enough for boeing
@johnhaan9862 ай бұрын
While bad news for Boeing and disappointing, better to catch the flaw now during test flights than have a tragedy on a commercial flight later.
@miguelangelriveiro2 ай бұрын
By the time this plane gets certified it will be completely obsolete!
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
No it wont
@YourOldUncleNoongah2 ай бұрын
1989 Joker: "That company needs an Enema!" * blows twice on Party Blower *
@toms13482 ай бұрын
That's a good one!
@saivarshan30762 ай бұрын
Bruh ill be 70 before I get to fly in this thing wtf
@wadehiggins11142 ай бұрын
@@saivarshan3076 how old are you now, 20?
@AndyPat2392 ай бұрын
that's why there known as test flights. situation normal?
@PatPat1442 ай бұрын
Sorry, this is good news. The safety of the plane is not ignored any more by Boeing. This is why we test planes and do test flights
@pvkoinch2 ай бұрын
How fate turns like "If it's Boeing I'm going" to "If it's Boeing I'm not going".😢😢😢😢😢
@alicelund1472 ай бұрын
11½ years since project launch and it is not a new design. This project takes a long time.
@christophesch40702 ай бұрын
This is good news. They do testing right.
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
Absolutely not, testing was done on this aircraft, the part failed during FAA CERTIFICATION - as in their job was to show the FAA that the plane was complete and safe for the public. They also did NOT detect the issue till the part completely fractured, likely only because the plane was instrumented still. Had this plane gone into service (which Boeing was essentially telling the FAA it could…) I believe it would have resulted in the engine detaching from the pylon during takeoff/climb. In revenue service the thrust link wouldn’t have been examined for a very long time, and it wouldn’t have been picked up by standard instrumentation on production aircraft. So no, not good news. It’s pure luck that Boeing caught this the way they did.
@100-pc-notbot2 ай бұрын
737Max, 777x, SLS, Starliner.... are they capable of building anything beyond a paperclip anymore?
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
Don’t forget the freaking KC-46 program! That should be right up there with the MAX, probably worse than the 777X honestly.
@Luke_Go2 ай бұрын
Was there anybody surprised by this news? Emirates, Lufthansa and Co. are looking forward to more Boeing payments .....
@matthiashehn44102 ай бұрын
Only needs some XCAS and a crate of spare parts, some self assembly required
@neilpountney94142 ай бұрын
Its well past time Boeing got their house in order there seems to be no substantial effort to do this. Sure the business has to think years into the future but with so many problems with current aircraft I dont know how they even get started.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
they are. This isnt about the house being in a better shape. Something was making this worse than it was
@rickwhite41372 ай бұрын
Yesterday, the headline was "Good news for Boeing" at another channel.
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
It was this channel 😉
@jean-yvesferry46692 ай бұрын
The cracked engine mount findings happened 3 days ago. This channel should have checked its news sources before publishing another another "good news for Boeing" video yesterday. He felt embarrassed about that.
@hawktb92 ай бұрын
Time to cut the bean counters out of the equation and let the Boeing ENGINEERS take the reins like they used to. Cutting corners just to save a buck is what engineers have been fighting against for decades now.
@cavoksimulations.17252 ай бұрын
I don't get why finding an issue with the structural integrity of the aircraft IN TESTING is viewed in a negative light. That is the whole point of testing: to find what design feature works according to the designs, preliminary sketches, and modeling before it was built.
@dewyakana15432 ай бұрын
Was it missing a bolt? Was the bolt installation!, documented? Tourq rated
@jasonbabila60062 ай бұрын
That’s what test flights are for, to test and find failed or failing components, equipment(s) etc then make adjustments or upgrades.
@glennprevost71402 ай бұрын
This why you do flight tests and inspection.
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
I wish they did this with the MCAS on the 737 MAX.
@grahamariss21112 ай бұрын
If it is fatique then it is going to be a lengthy exercise to redesign and certify the new engine mounts, as they are part of the aircrafts main structure, finding premature fatique in them is as significant as finding it in the main spar!
@malcolmmacdougall2 ай бұрын
exactly....... this is a year delay before it can be retested again...depends how serious it is.
@janwitts26882 ай бұрын
When your design uses magic pixie dust instead of high quality alloy
@sokolum2 ай бұрын
Such structural failure is actually massive set down, it means the whole wing needs to be reviewed, as one part has a relation to the next part in their strength calculations. This can’t be solved by diligence.
@darkredvan2 ай бұрын
That there are problems found during testflights is not uncommon. The main issue is, they are way behind schedule. It seems they found more than enough problems that needed to be adressed to proceed as intended. Airlines will be far from amused to see a further delay getting their aircraft. Boeing seems to fight a battle on multiple fronts they might not be able to win in time.
@CrazyLlama7712 ай бұрын
If it’s Boeing, I’m still going. I ain’t scared to do anything.
@wadehiggins11142 ай бұрын
@@CrazyLlama771 enjoy
@dikoman5162 ай бұрын
Says the Boeing stocks owner.
@olooch66412 ай бұрын
@@dikoman516nah just says anyone with a brain, nobody going to do because you go on Boeing, otherwise it wouldn’t be an aircraft company
@cartmann2272 ай бұрын
Good
@tyronedowns61402 ай бұрын
I'm 52 years old now and by the time this plane gets certified I'll be 90 years old by then! LOL!!! 😂 Better to be safe than sorry n its a good thing they are finally fixing the problems with this beautiful new birds. I had really high hopes that it was almost getting it's certification by the FAA n be put into service next year. Might get push to 2026-2027 for deliveries probably now.
@chandrachurniyogi83942 ай бұрын
if Boeing wants to stay in the game it needs a B737MAX replacement asap . . . and that new Boeing narrow body jet should be fully operational & in service with airlines by 2035 - 2036 . . . two get rid of the folding wing tips from the B777-9X or replace it with a conventional fixed wing tip . . . things will be a lot easier then . . .
@fxhomie2 ай бұрын
Get rid of the folding wingtips and it’s now a Class VI jet, same as the A380. That means fewer airports to fly into. The wingtips are here to stay.
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
The wingtips are one of the only things on this plane that DON’T seem to be giving Boeing any issues. Don’t forget, this is basically a 777-300ER with the wing that plane always should have had. Shorten the wing and you’re back to square one. Its economics are already marginal (given it’s 6yr delays - would have been much more appealing if it entered service in 2020 or something.) And no, their last two projects to simply upgrade existing designs have been TERRIBLE with the KC-46 and the 777X, I don’t think anyone on the aviation world has faith in Boeings ability to design and actually produce a clean-sheet aircraft right now. The entire company needs to have a massive “come to Jesus” moment. Like everyone. Even the janitors. 😂
@fxhomie2 ай бұрын
@@EstorilEm Amen...
@bluedragonkimchi92982 ай бұрын
Still profit over safety, shame on you Calhoun.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
how is this profit over safety? shame on you for typing a silly comment
@stevewilson63902 ай бұрын
How many flight hours had these planes endured? Not many i guess . Scary situation.
@HansCSchellenberg2 ай бұрын
Boeing is paying the price for many years of poor management that favored investors over engineering and product quality...
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
this hasn't got to do with poor management
@kris87422 ай бұрын
The capitalist system at its worst.
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
Yes, it is poor management. Boeing gave priority to MAX certification and caused 777X tests to be delayed. If they didn't do like that, this problem could have been noticed last year and already fixed now.
@dewyakana15432 ай бұрын
Still ain't going
@raymondleongdiva2 ай бұрын
I bet it will not be delivered in 2026 for sure...
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
Prove it
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
They will deliver one on December 30th 2026, so they can tick a checkmark and management get their bonuses. On January 2nd, they will call it back in for service, because they forgot to put the cabin interior and to ensure that all bolts are in place.
@artrandy2 ай бұрын
Im not an apologist for Boeing, but I do sympathise when aircraft design hits a few snags when it pushes past current technology, but my gripe with Boeing, is that if they hadn't given priority to other projects over the 777X for so long, we would be past this point and the aircraft in service by now. And I wonder if Emirates are closer to ordering the A350-1000 yet, as insurance against the continued 777X jinx, or are they going to operate those 380s until they become just as pensionable as Tim Clarke...😀...
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
They just bought 4 more A380s a few days ago! They’re all-in, and that was before this news… VERY good decision on their part.
@artrandy2 ай бұрын
@@EstorilEm Perfect aircraft for Emirates right now, but eventually they'll need to replace them. If the 777X certification fiasco develops into an in service jinx as well, then they'll need to reassess their policy of having a young fleet........
@EstorilEm2 ай бұрын
@@artrandy Hah I still think of the 380s as all being young, but I guess we are just getting older. Still, they ALL have a small cycle count thanks to the long haul nature of their ops. They’ve definitely managed to make the aircraft work for them, and regardless of the economics - passengers universally love the plane (on the flip side, most actually dislike the 77W due to noise/fatigue it seems?) We shall see - personally I think this is a MASSIVE issue that could result in an additional year delay for EIS. From my understanding of the failure, if they had gone TOGA or attempted another takeoff without discovering this - it very likely would have resulted in the engine departing the aircraft. Its entire purpose is to transfer some 100,000lb~ish thrust to the wing structure. There are simply no other components on the engine or wing-side of the pylon designed to handle those loads without it. As is common, it’ll probably take another week or two for this to really blow up in the media or to discover more details.
@jameshoopes64672 ай бұрын
Boeing is working on converting B52s for passenger use. It would happen faster than 777X certification. 🤷♂️
@sabrar1232 ай бұрын
Lovely very good news
@YamiPheonix5312 ай бұрын
The thrust links are the components that failed. Thrust link’s purpose is to transfer the GE Gen9x Turbofan engine’s thrust power to the Boeing 777x wings which pulls the airplane forward. Since the GE Gen9x can produce over 100,000 lbs. of thrust it will make sense to make the thrust links more robust to handle all that thrust power.
@kkrsnn56322 ай бұрын
Maybe the new guy will clean up. Still a lot of dirt will pop up in the near future.
@ETW12 ай бұрын
Airbus should boost their production of A350-1000 for sure other airlines will shift to A350 if these B777x will not certified in 2025
@kalamarspinner2 ай бұрын
Here we go again,truly disgraceful,Their so called customers must be delighted!!more compensation to be paid .Just buy Airbus
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
They can't. Nobody will just buy airbus.
@zhaolaogong2 ай бұрын
The commercial aircraft, whether it be Boeing or any other aircraft is the most sophisticated machine ever built. There is virtually no unimportant part in the aircraft so it must be completely trouble free. I am impressed by Boeings aim to make a perfect machine. Boeing will come out of this better than ever.
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
"Boeings aim to make a perfect machine" Boeing: $$$ 😅
@MBrieger2 ай бұрын
Who needs Engines?
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
Engines are overrated, fuel hungry and heavy. Get rid of them and save on weight and fuel.
@nurrizadjatmiko212 ай бұрын
Now early 2026 is logical. Maybe Lufthansa was right.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
We don't know how long this delay could be
@grandnagus58512 ай бұрын
I guess the only good thing about this is that they caught the issue BEFORE delivery of the regular unites. A low bar generally, but, it would seam, a higher bar for Boeing, so i guess it's a good thing. Still i wouldn't fly Boeing for the foreseeable future, i do plan to live a few more years after all.
@craiggemmell45592 ай бұрын
Do these teething issues happen with all new designs? It seems the 777X has been particularly troublesome.
@garyrazon15272 ай бұрын
They're doomed.....
@Dan.d6492 ай бұрын
They are not doomed. They are too big of a company to be doomed. They'll be fine.
@alexrebmann12532 ай бұрын
Both Boeing and AB are buying titanium from China that recently has been found to have flaws.
@jakeoht7912 ай бұрын
From finding a flaw in testing?
@directionfinderformen2 ай бұрын
No we're not. I work for Boeing. We'll get it figured out as soon as we come back from our strike. 😂 seriously.
@coletrickle5812 ай бұрын
Engines too heavy and powerful?
@neilsunn2 ай бұрын
DJ downer on Boeing again. Tough industry .
@MerkyAviation112 ай бұрын
Every day bad news at Boeing, bad news at Boeing…when will it stop? 🤣
@glenncampbell60382 ай бұрын
It’ll be at least 2026 at the earliest before this aircraft get its cert
@dewyakana15432 ай бұрын
Its a BOEING!
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
I am not going!
@dodoubleg23562 ай бұрын
Well when you’re mounting engines the size of AirBNB’s on an aircraft wing, the mounting brackets should uh…🙄
@pandamisha2 ай бұрын
This aircraft gonna get old before it's certified 😅😂😅
@fahmihazizan34742 ай бұрын
Will be launch somewhere around 2050… maybe.. failed product..
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
oh yeah prove it
@BigWhoopZH2 ай бұрын
Are parts holding the engine on the wing really that important?
@BHUBJOHNNY2 ай бұрын
This is another Boeing death trap
@jocelynharris-fx8ho2 ай бұрын
Bad news for Boeing ; 1. Should never have merged with McDonnell Douglas. 2. Should never have ended production of the 757. 3. The 737 Max single handedly destroyed the company's reputation. Good news for Boeing : fire the McDonnell Douglas executives. 2. Return the headquarters to Seattle and Let engineers run the company again. 3. Re-open the 757 production line and make it more competitive with Airbus' 320 series. Put the flex wing on the updated 757. 4. Scrap the 737 Max and the Dreamliner 5. Apologize to the families of the whistleblowers who died.and the families of the passengers who died in the Max crashes. 6. Apologize to the employees of Boeing ,who worked hard to build high quality, safe, state of the art aircraft, only to have their livelihoods put in jeopardy. 7. Get the astronauts back home and stay out of the space program until you learn to safely transport people here on earth .Boeing needs to do some soul searching before they end up in the aviation graveyard.
@tomstravels5202 ай бұрын
Why would they remake the 757? It would have to be recertified as a brand new aircraft……..so you might as well build a brand new aircraft
@jocelynharris-fx8ho2 ай бұрын
@@tomstravels520 you must not be familiar with how popular the 757 was. Many airlines, for many years, had been begging Boeing to bring it back and make an updated version. Pilots loved it's rocket-like take-off speed; especially those pilots who once flew fighter jets in the military. Passengers loved it and when it was originally built, it was designed with Rolls Royce RB-211 engines, to operate from airports with short runways but still have the power to operate long distance flights. I worked at an airport for a number of years and in the aviation industry, the 757 earned the nickname: the "Ferrari of the skies", or the " Seattle rocket". It was a much loved aircraft and had the capability to do so much. There was no need for a 787 Dreamliner, when that technology could have been incorporated into an updated version of the 757. Remember, Boeing never built a -100 series 757 because they wanted to leave that option open in the future, should they want to build a "down-sized" version like they did with the 747. ( The 747 SP- special performance). A down-sized 757 would have been a more logical way to compete with the the A320 rather than trying to "Max out" the 737, which was an almost 60 year old aircraft. The 757 by comparison is still fairly young and the potential was there, to incorporate new technology and features for today's market . Not to mention, that it is a beautiful, very sleek and very graceful jet. It is pleasure just to look at it .
@tomstravels5202 ай бұрын
@@jocelynharris-fx8ho you don’t need to tell me the history of the 757. I know all about that stuff. But it doesn’t matter how popular it is. Boeing isn’t going to build a new assembly line to build the 757 again even with new wings and engines when it would have to be recertified exactly like a brand new plane and go through the whole testing and elevation process again. It’s bad enough trying to get the 777x through that process at the moment let alone a brand new plane. A replacement for the 757 yes that could be possible, but Boeing have put that project on hold whilst they sort out their current problems and Airbus is steaming ahead with the A321Neo, LR and XLR
@MrHarshilsharma2 ай бұрын
Adding 777x in my "no fly" list.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
why should you
@747forever92 ай бұрын
Funny start Dj!!
@randyharmon7172 ай бұрын
These guys need to think twice about going on strike there craftsmanship is poor and isn’t getting any better. Maybe they should go on strike and destroy the company altogether and a venture capitalist would buy it pennies on the dollar. As they say you’ve got to hit rock bottom before you can see the forest through the fires. Now I’m one that things can get better but negotiations are two sided sword Corporate leadership and Union Stewards better make some major concessions. These things really bring light to those actually building the planes rockets or anything built by Boeing. Imagine is very tarnished in my opinion it can always be improved but in this case it might take awhile good luck.
@RacingDriver172 ай бұрын
Dj's: "sighs......"
@tomicaguyusa46332 ай бұрын
😊🔫
@maxtonczerwinski36712 ай бұрын
At this point just ditch the plane bro cause boing is becoming a complete failure. Disappointing.
@pegitt12 ай бұрын
I think the A380 production line will be reinstated and delivering aircraft before the 777X is certified.
@sainnt2 ай бұрын
I predicted this headline 2 days ago. 😂😂 Boeing found a part that it seemed doesn't meet its specs. That means Boeing is going to have a chat with the supplier so that the component is up to spec before installing them on customers' plane. Calling this bad news was expected by the media, but it's actually good news. I predict that the next 'Bad News For Boeing ' will be about the 787. I mean, why report them together when you can monetize two separate videos? SMH.
@jakeoht7912 ай бұрын
The way people talk about this is crazy. If you don’t find problems or areas of interest in testing, chances are you’re not doing a good job testing. Even if people hate Boeing and love Airbus it still hurts the industry when you go around fear mongering. Or my favorite quote from this week, “Boeing finds flaw in testing, is this the end for Boeing?”
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
It is bad news, because it may mean a delay in delivery. If Boeing wasn't already late for several years, it wouldn't be a big issue. By the way, why did you delete your comment on yesterday's video? Or will you deny again that you deleted your comment?
@Tpr_18082 ай бұрын
@sainnt and as usual, engagement brings more money
@sainnt2 ай бұрын
@@user-yt198 Are we back to this crap about deleting? I'm not deleting anything.
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
Liar
@andymaurice76932 ай бұрын
No blow..its part of the process.......
@rajeshraghavan22482 ай бұрын
I love the Boeing 777X. It can open the wing tip, close it back. Open close, open close, open close, open close, open close, open close..... It doesn't need to fly you know... Awesome creation ❤️
@kevinp81082 ай бұрын
I think I will wait a few years to fly the 777X after it makes its debut. I've learned this from the 737MAX disasters!
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
why should you? the max disasters have nothing to do with the 777x delays
@kevinp81082 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 all new aircraft still have kinks to iron out when they are released for passenger use. Look at the B787 when it first launched! Lithium battery issues.
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
Good decisions. Once those pilons start cracking and the engines falling of the plane, I don't want to be on that thing.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@todortodorov6056 then dont fly anything
@artrandy2 ай бұрын
@@todortodorov6056 I don't want to be under it either.......
@melbournechugging29992 ай бұрын
Tofu-dreg
@golf94srm2 ай бұрын
Nothing goes in the right path for the 777X! Good luck to the key customers.
@wadehiggins11142 ай бұрын
@@golf94srm nothing goes right at boeing
@drevil26752 ай бұрын
Good news to humanity
@stevenlemieux72202 ай бұрын
If you think you jinksed/jinkst/ jinxed its top talking about it. Not sure is jinx even a word?
@johnmartinez54722 ай бұрын
while it’s normal to have things come up as it’s in this phase of testing-it’s important to get things perfect-otherwise the same hypocrites will be the same folks complaining….they need to get to the root problem-those that’re making parts for boeing
@GregPalmer10002 ай бұрын
How many 777x has Boeing produced so far other than the test aircraft?
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
quite a lot in storage
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
According to Seattle Times 30. It makes *$6 billion* in net prices. It is poor management to let them rot in the factory and gave priority to MAX7 and MAX10 which have negligible airframes finished.
@daviddd512 ай бұрын
Really a biased channel against boeing
@pvkoinch2 ай бұрын
Nope. Every channel/media on Earth is biased. It's necessary for thriving😅.
@helmutzollner54962 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 Can this be true? I thought Airbus was a bunch of cowboys when they used different versions of CATYA in Tolouse and Hamburg that led to the A380 tubing and cabling not matching up. But Boeing is truely taking the crown! CAN Boeing do anything right? B737, B777X, Starliner, Airforce One, K Tanker. Anything they touch turns to booboo.
@todortodorov60562 ай бұрын
Airbus was a mess in the 2000's. In 2006 they had 3 CEOs, with Christian Streiff lasting only 5 months. But they managed to clean up and streamline the company structure. This also includes stupid decisions like using two different software versions. After the A380, projects were managed much better.
@EuropeanRailfanAlt2 ай бұрын
@@todortodorov6056And now the A350 seems like the perfect (high capacity) widebody aircraft!
@davidkendall16142 ай бұрын
With the trendline Boeing is on, I am waiting for them to start a new designation…the 666.
@luiswebster49982 ай бұрын
every single time boeing is screwed
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
airbus is screwed too
@luiswebster49982 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 not as bad as boeing
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@luiswebster4998 oh yeah. They couldn't design a fireproof fuel tank. More to come in the coming years for sure
@luiswebster49982 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 loads more problems for both manufactures looks like there is no clear path for either of them
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@luiswebster4998 no. Clearly not. It'll only get worse and they will seize to exist
@swanvictor8872 ай бұрын
here's the issue for me: Will they Fix the issue or will they do a botch job and cover-up, a la MAX? Boeing should stop panicking and responding to Airbus, concentrate on making planes again and not get all bothered by the success of their rival.
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
why would you expect a botch job just like what the MAX went through? they will do a thorough fix for it and not a botch job!
@swanvictor8872 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 Of course they will...oh...wait a minute....heard that song before....They REALLY REALLY FIXED the MAX didn't they......but they are not flaws, they are "Quality Escapes" - you know, as in The knowledge of building safe aircraft escapes us for the time being....
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@swanvictor887 Where have you got the term Quality escape from.this recent issue? PH wait you just love to use previous terminology to say what it was. Jumping to conclusions as to why it happened. Im fed up of this I know it all attitude before the summary of what happened and why from the manufacturer themselves
@swanvictor8872 ай бұрын
@@nickolliver3021 We know what the issue is: some naughty person forgot to bolt the door in place. Forgive me if I don't take Boeing's word for gospel these days....they do have a bit of history, after all...
@nickolliver30212 ай бұрын
@@swanvictor887 Where has this got to do with the door? Airbus forget to make sure their fuel tank was fireproof oh wait they do have a bit of history too .....
@OTRTrader2 ай бұрын
Harley Davidson has done away with their DEI and woke hiring standards, and so has John Deere. Maybe Boeing and the airlines should start watching them at this point.
@Marqk-2 ай бұрын
Cause what’s most important is that it gets certified actual safety doesn’t matter, 😂
@HansCSchellenberg2 ай бұрын
Looking forward to the B777MAX 😆🤣
@Coupe-sy9nk2 ай бұрын
So they found an issue during testing 🤔 ummmm that's why you test. For the idiots calling it out this was apart of boeing transparency with customers to let them know if anything is found in testing that needs to be addressed. Every plane maker auto maker test extensively to find issues and what do you know they found one of concern, that's going to be fixed immediately. These videos just make for clicks because it's boeing. I bet a similar video regarding Airbus finding minor issues with testing wouldn't be created.
@user-yt1982 ай бұрын
Some other idiots don't understand that the main issue is not finding problems during testing. The main issue is 777X certification has been already delayed for several years and this new issue will create further delay while everybody was expecting 777X aircraft to start to be delivered. Boeing gave all its engineering force to MAX7 and MAX10 certification, postponing 777X tests to be delayed and caused this technical issue to surface this late. At the end of the day neither MAX7, nor MAX10, nor 777X was certified, those idiots don't seem to notice.
@maz35632 ай бұрын
Starting to feel like Airbus saboteurs have been hired by Boeing… Nowadays, everything seems to be possible… 🤔
@gunvaldsandhaland77572 ай бұрын
Security FIRST boeing
@DismayWord2011lol2 ай бұрын
good news to bad news lol
@othmarbrunner96392 ай бұрын
You are such a two sided Boeing hater The upcoming recession will devastate airlines and airplane makers including Airbus Hopefully it will eliminate your naive video chanel