OMG I love this. My teacher showed it to us and I tried it on every equation she gave us and I got every one right and I think I was probably the first one finished (hard to tell with online class!!). This makes it SO EASY!!!!!!! I love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@nyomimenchaca19462 жыл бұрын
This is SOOO MUCH EASIER!!! You're a total life saver
@aqqi26992 жыл бұрын
great work sir,you cleared my age long confusion in mere minutes
@shoreline92013 жыл бұрын
Great explanation! very visual and straight forward! Thanks!
@AyanP074 жыл бұрын
Great ! Amazing Sir! Love from India👍🇮🇳
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
हेलो इंडिया! 💖 थैंक यू वैरी मच!
@RAHUL_CARS16 күн бұрын
Thank you sir! I'm also from India 🧡🤍💚
@madjedbebeaesara52964 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! This is such a beautiful straightforward and visual method. My students will love this, thank you very much for posting!
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment. I especially enjoy hearing from teachers!
@philoadriensson98502 жыл бұрын
I could not balance this equation until I found your video!!!! FeS2+O2--->Fe2O3 + SO2 made me crazy until your method. Lots of boxes, it worked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU 😊
@JarretBerenson Жыл бұрын
GREAT!!!! So straightforward!
@zoeyguitarz85933 жыл бұрын
You're amazing, the way you talk is so clear and simple
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@eunicemeus17202 жыл бұрын
MIND BLOWING haha 2nd time taking this class and man this just help me understand
@yadhunandhan75882 жыл бұрын
OMFG!!! this was the most helpful video in chemistry for me!! it made me understand the most difficult thing in chemistry 4 me! thx for uploading!!
@CrashChemistryAcademy2 жыл бұрын
😊
@rolandoagrazal2 жыл бұрын
Just beautiful. Thank you so much Mr.
@GladysLee-ff4xj2 жыл бұрын
You are a saviour
@TheKartana4 жыл бұрын
Top 10 ways to balance a chemical equation! Number 4 will surprise you!
@Wolf-yr1qy2 жыл бұрын
What’s the best way?
@Backyard_BBQ_4 күн бұрын
The best for sure.
@SkyAssassin93 жыл бұрын
life saver, thank you so much
4 жыл бұрын
Wow. Very good.
@lumpyppp3 жыл бұрын
omg this is great. perfect. thank you.
@muttudadmi78013 жыл бұрын
Trott
@noora54803 жыл бұрын
It really helped me a lot 😄...thank you☺
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Great!
@sk8terbluetoo3 жыл бұрын
extremely helpful!!!
@colenzjoachimcamero9019 Жыл бұрын
Best teacher
@jannaalamban3240Ай бұрын
THANKK YOUUUU!!!!!
@mobinakamran88742 жыл бұрын
Deadass, you saved me
@kyliesmommy842 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Sincerely. Thank you!!!!
@CrashChemistryAcademy2 жыл бұрын
You're Welcome!
@zoeyguitarz85933 жыл бұрын
You literally made me smile and wipe my tears after two days of crying over this thing lmao, thanks!!!
@musicmybae24663 жыл бұрын
Very good
@DetectiveLevi2 жыл бұрын
Damn this was truly helpful
@CrashChemistryAcademy2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@sumitrana24204 жыл бұрын
There are instances when the polyatomic ion would be left alright but there is a new element and it is hard to guess whether it has been made by polyatomic ion A or polyatomic ion B on the reactant side On that case things would start to get messy and confusing to which to label as what
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
If you are not sure then you should split up the ion and count its atoms individually.
@sumitrana24204 жыл бұрын
@@CrashChemistryAcademy yes but now there is always a nagging question that when we should do it and by doing that we are actually INCREASING our run time by a minor amount and that is for complicated setups certainly but that is where this is WANTED. This system only saves you a minor amount of process time but that amount is very VERY appreciated but if we are confused whether to use the ionic system as one thing or not and then actually processing it and also thinking whether we should use the system in the first place in the place it starts consuming exorbitant amount of time. In such case not having a system is better than having one. But appreciate the effort anyway and I do hope you will come up with a revised and more useful edition of the trick for stuff soon.
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
I think you are right that I could have been more clear about what I meant, using an example, of when the polyatomic ion breaks apart. I decided against it, but maybe that was the wrong decision. I'll give you an example, but regardless of the method, or system, you use, it always is just a way to count atoms. All balancing is counting atoms. An example of a polyatomic ion breaking up is: Cu + HNO3 --> CuNO3 + NO2 + H2O. Here the nitrate ion, NO3, both stays together (CuNO3) and breaks apart (NO2 + H2O). So you cannot count the NO3 as a single unit, you have to count the N and O separately. It does not matter that one of the products has nitrate in it, because there has to be nitrates in the reactant side that lose oxygen to the hydrogen, and so you have to count the N and O separately. I hope that helps. Whether my method or some other method is better for balancing this is really your choice.