Thanks, this makes it a piece of cake. I love your channel!!!
@pauldolinko99054 жыл бұрын
illustrations are extremely clear and creative. great vid, thanks!!
@greent4963 жыл бұрын
Thank you, your gonna be my new chemistry teacher from now on
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
👍
@winterdreller58403 жыл бұрын
He IS my chemistry teacher. He’s great!
@Albunnie4 жыл бұрын
Thank you finally understand :)
@laurenbucci65323 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!!! this was very helpful and you explained it perfectly!!
@chromesupport74414 жыл бұрын
A really excellent video. Thanks!!
@madjedbebeaesara52964 жыл бұрын
perfectly explained!
@bubbahotep63164 жыл бұрын
I got it!!!! thank you sooooo much! You are a great teacher!!!!!!
@bhawanasharma85034 жыл бұрын
thank you sir, your teaching method is so nice and now I understand this concept very well.
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment!
@jennamathis43443 жыл бұрын
thank you so much this video is so clear and helpful
@aesarahypatia34823 жыл бұрын
so cool. perfectly explained. perfect graphics.
@noshinrafiqzai Жыл бұрын
Made my life easier. Tysm !
@CrashChemistryAcademy Жыл бұрын
You're welcome, glad it helped!
@charlottecollins95203 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!!
@habinbireh2 жыл бұрын
Hello sir i need the answer asap. What type of chemical reaction is FeCl3 + K4[Fe(CN)6] → KFe[Fe(CN)6] + 3 KCl?
@saw94132 жыл бұрын
u are a lifesaver. tysm my dude
@oatmeal92273 жыл бұрын
thank u for this video
@cruz36083 жыл бұрын
Wish there was a video on decomposition.
@desfernandez44542 жыл бұрын
this helped me a lot to succesfully answer my science module. i sincerely thank you for this interesting and informative video:D
@CrashChemistryAcademy2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@carlallendaviddeguzman48863 жыл бұрын
Can I ask something? Is CH4+H2O=CO2+H2O can be balanced?
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
That is not really a reaction. CH4 does not react with H2O. If you mean CH4 + O2 -> CO2 + H2O, that is a reaction that can be balanced. See kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKrQaYWLprCbmdk for how to balance.
@carlallendaviddeguzman48863 жыл бұрын
@@CrashChemistryAcademy Thank you so much
@freepalestine17644 жыл бұрын
I'm am still very confused. Why does Cl have a subscript of 3 on the right but a subscription of 2 on the left
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
the subscript changes to balance the charge. The Zn on the left has a 2+ charge while the Al on the right has a 3+ charge. You may want to watch my video on predicting products, which goes into more detail with this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIayZ4ZoqdJ1btk
@freepalestine17644 жыл бұрын
@@CrashChemistryAcademy omg you're still responding to comments. I'll watch the video thank you
@sahalkoth38394 жыл бұрын
Love from India 😃Can't you add subtitle to it
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
I am behind with putting in subtitles. Thanks for the reminder!
@BhupendraSingh-ol7tm4 жыл бұрын
Are you not able to understand???
@bubbahotep63164 жыл бұрын
It has subtitles! Yay!
@noshinrafiqzai Жыл бұрын
How to find out its double displacement without the aqueous because our teacher tell us to find the states ourselves
@CrashChemistryAcademy Жыл бұрын
This video should help kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXK7dpuaa6mbgq8
@BhupendraSingh-ol7tm4 жыл бұрын
I want to ask something pls answer Q- which type of reaction is happening in this following reaction?? -HCl + NaOH gives us NaCl + H²O Pls answer fast
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
It has two names, it is usually called an acid-base reaction, but in higher level texts you may see it called a metathesis reaction, meaning not an oxidation reduction.
@furqanelahie30053 жыл бұрын
double displacement
@waserased51764 жыл бұрын
So if I combined copper nitrate solution and an Iron nail. Would it be a precipitation reaction?
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Yes but... So solid copper metal precipitates from aqueous copper ions, which makes it a precipitate. However most high school textbooks would classify this only as a single replacement. However a college text would classify it as an oxidation reduction, with the observation that a precipitation occurs. It most definitely is an oxidation reduction as well as precipitation. You might want to take a look at my video on double replacement for clarification: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIayZ4ZoqdJ1btk
@xyramikaelalano74233 жыл бұрын
Thanksssss
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@muskusOG3 жыл бұрын
how am i supposed to find synthesis without the product because that's the only feature
@CrashChemistryAcademy3 жыл бұрын
If it is a reaction between a metal and a nonmetal then you write a compound that balances the ionic charges, and that is the synthesis. With two non-metals it is not straightforward at all and you would need a lot of additional information, and two metals create an alloy.
@geethajeyalingam60244 жыл бұрын
Magnesium fluoride is soluble ,the precipitate is zinc sulfate
@CrashChemistryAcademy4 жыл бұрын
zinc sulfate solubility is 57.7 g/100 mL water, anhydrous (20 °C), magnesium fluoride is 0.013 g/100 mL (temp not given) (Wikipedia)
@returnofthemomos5 жыл бұрын
First
@CrashChemistryAcademy5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Owen, yer the best!
@fukpoeslaw36135 жыл бұрын
Can you burn oxygen? I mean going from oxygen to ozone.
@CrashChemistryAcademy5 жыл бұрын
So while ozone is synthesized through oxidation, probably via diatomic oxygen, it likely does not release much energy (I have not compared their bond energies) since ozone is a better oxidizer than diatomic oxygen, in other words it loses an oxygen atom easily, meaning it probably has low bond energy and therefore there is little energy given off in bond formation, so no burning. Hope that makes sense.
@fukpoeslaw36135 жыл бұрын
@@CrashChemistryAcademy thanks for replying.
@fukpoeslaw36135 жыл бұрын
@@CrashChemistryAcademy But does that mean one oxygen molecule gets oxidized but the other not, so reduced? That's confusing!
@CrashChemistryAcademy5 жыл бұрын
@@fukpoeslaw3613 Good point. I think one way to view this is that the ozone molecule has a slight polarity with the central oxygen being partially negative. From this, one might assume that the central oxygen gets reduced during O3 formation, with the added (third) oxygen getting oxidized. I'm not sure how else one could look at this. It does have to be a redox, nothing else fits.