Notice how one is having an engine failure. Great detail
@sirilluminarthevaliant28954 жыл бұрын
@Hollis yeah. Doesn’t look totally out. Probably be fine. Some guy with a rifle just got himself a big storyv
@certifiedhalfwit77144 жыл бұрын
Holy hell I never noticed that before. Honestly the amount of small details I learnt from youtube comments about band of brothers is amazing.
@retronatics20974 жыл бұрын
Prop on the right side of the aircraft with engine failure is also either not turning or missing altogether. Note that just as the camera is able to focus on the aircraft you can see props clearly on both sides of the preceding aircraft, but not the last one.
@certifiedhalfwit77144 жыл бұрын
@@RaiderOfTheLost chill bro for real
@keiranallcott15154 жыл бұрын
De haviland mosquitoes came back to bases on one engine more than people think , pilots still handled them well
@danaitken3404 жыл бұрын
Much of Band of Brothers was filmed on the old de Havilland factory site. It makes sense that these were Mosquitos and their inclusion a nod from the programme makers.
@terrysaunders2144 жыл бұрын
Yep I live near the old De Havilland factory and both BOB and Saving Private Ryan were filmed at Hatfield
@babaganoush61064 жыл бұрын
It’s a great shame that parts of the actual factory weren’t listed buildings. How many people know that part of the factory still had a massive depression in the roof from when it was bombed by a ju88 during the Battle of Britain, the pilot was an ex de havilland apprentice
@BatMan-xr8gg4 жыл бұрын
@freebeerfordworkers The Mossie used rockets for close air support to ground units.
@jacksonhudd36814 жыл бұрын
The gate house, that stood at the entrance to the De Havilland aircraft company.......is now a KFC!!
@danaitken3404 жыл бұрын
One of the old hangers is a gym and the original design building now the new police station as well.
@paulkirkland32634 жыл бұрын
These are Mosquitos. The short fuselage forward of the wing's leading edge eliminates both the B-26 and the A-20, which had bombardier's compartments. And before anyone says the Mosquito bomber had a glazed nose - it had a perspex nose cone and two small side windows, but it was only for observation by the navigator or W/Op before he returned to his seat beside and just behind the pilot. Also, the fuselage tapers too narrowly back towards the tail, and the wings are too tapered, for either a B-26 or A-20.
@hosswindu1664 жыл бұрын
Well then. That settles it. Time for a beer.
@asdic8884 жыл бұрын
The A-20G, the most common model, had a solid nose.
Every time I watch a video about ww2 aircraft, there is always some sort of debate.
@Ad-er5rc3 жыл бұрын
I saw someone trying to argue that the British lost the Battle of Britain...
@honkhonk80093 жыл бұрын
@@Ad-er5rc Lmfao these people play war thunder once, and think its realistic.
@MikeTheBike583 жыл бұрын
Mainly from armchair experts.
@keraptisblackrazor26584 жыл бұрын
I'm going with a mosquito but the boys in the trench clearly think it's USAF of some variety, that's why they're staying in cover. “when the Germans fly over, the English duck. When the English fly over the Germans duck. And when the Americans fly over, everyone ducks"
@Armoredcompany4 жыл бұрын
90% sure those are A-20s
@Triv2234 жыл бұрын
@@Armoredcompany definitely mosquito
@BatMan-xr8gg4 жыл бұрын
@@Armoredcompany Mossies, can tell from the shape.
@hughjohnson26744 жыл бұрын
Does that 10% of doubt come from the fact these little graphical aeroplanes have inline engines, never did I see an A20 without radials.
@Armoredcompany4 жыл бұрын
@@hughjohnson2674 nah, mostly them being cgi so they could be literally anything
@gris1863 жыл бұрын
There are so many famous people that was basically unknown actors when in Band of Brothers
@markhughes79274 жыл бұрын
So much ‘industrial waste’ and ‘amateur know-how’ stitched together by a maverick genius - flying over-head. The real miracle plane of WW2.
@ffrederickskitty2144 жыл бұрын
18 months from drawing board to combat. How many times has that been achieved?
@Eastcyning3 жыл бұрын
@@ffrederickskitty214 "In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked. " Hermann Göring
@ffrederickskitty2143 жыл бұрын
@@Eastcyning even our brilliant aeronautical engineers were dragged down by the sheer idiocy of our politicians. We are a shadow of what we once were
@rhysgoodman76282 жыл бұрын
@@ffrederickskitty214 and the Yanks kicked us out of our own nuclear weapons program. We built them a bomb and they kicked us out…
@Noorullah13 жыл бұрын
0:17 I wonder if anyone noticed, but that plane is missing a propeller. Goes to show the infantrymen weren't the only ones having a difficult time battling the Germans.
@spaceshiba5752 жыл бұрын
both propellers are on the plane, one is just failing to work. I think if it were missing, it would be tilted to the left seeming as it would not have any power on the left side. (or the pilots would have to constantly fight to keep it straight up)
@resolute1233 жыл бұрын
Good eye. I always thought they were B-26 Marauders, but looking at photo comparison between the two, you're right.
@markbulgarin58054 жыл бұрын
Market garden might have been a failure....but for my grandfather this operation was his way to get out of this war. He fought in the 9th SS Hohenstaufen and he and a few of his comrades surrendered to the Tommies.....they were tired of fighting a war that they were losing...I can't say how greatfull I am how good the English were to him during his time as a POW.
@samuelpepys21083 жыл бұрын
Did your Grandfather survive the war?
@signaller74833 жыл бұрын
A shame he wasn't executed. That's all the SS deserve.
@g_abe.3 жыл бұрын
@@signaller7483 I’d love to see what you would’ve done in their place. A fair number of SS were forcibly conscripted.
@dawsonlucas3693 жыл бұрын
@@g_abe. they forcibly conscripted Hugo Stiglitz howd that go? People can fight back regardless of being conscripted sounds like an excuse to be a coward instead of fighting for yourself but idk 🤷🏼♂️ I think everyone’s a coward nowadays and would fight for the nazis look at how many people love wearing masks this is how it starts everyone’s blind compliance is the same at the Germans in 1940
@michaeldelahunty24404 жыл бұрын
Boy there uniforms are pretty spotless
@brucetucker48474 жыл бұрын
They just jumped in from their base in England a couple of hours before, they're all wearing fresh uniforms.
@brucetucker48474 жыл бұрын
@Hoa Tattis They left Normandy in July 1944 and went back to England, had several jumps canceled while the ground forces were racing across France, then jumped into the Netherlands on September 17, 1944 as part of Market Garden.
@bamarine2474 жыл бұрын
Nice detail making them British planes. Market Garden was a British operation and most of the units involved were British. The 82nd and 101st were pretty much the only US units involved
@christopherdean13263 жыл бұрын
I recently found out that the caretaker at my old school was one of the Paras at Market Garden. Always saw him as "just some old bloke sweeping up" He was a damn war hero!
@Beowolf53883 жыл бұрын
@@christopherdean1326 was he good a cleaning though?
@christopherdean13263 жыл бұрын
@@Beowolf5388 A lot of our detentions involved helping him clean the classrooms after school, he was pretty much a master of the broom, and passed his skills on freely!
@hughjohnson26744 жыл бұрын
Guys, it’s not a mossie, marauder, havoc, PE 13, Me 110....it’s a bunch of pixels strung together to look like a plane by a graphic artist. They’re in the background, they add colour and movement adding to the dynamic of the series. If they based their drawing on a mossie, well they did an average job according to all the rivet counters. Still it was better than Private Ryan and the P51 tank busting with 50 cals at the end. ( ummmahhh, now you’re in trouble!) for single engined ground support it would have been Typhoons or perhaps Spitfires of the Tactical airforce all based on the ground in France and designed for fast response.
@BatMan-xr8gg4 жыл бұрын
It is a Mossie, you can tell by the wing shape, the fuselage tapering back and the fact that Mossies used rockets for close air support to ground units.
@hughjohnson26744 жыл бұрын
Oh I believe you, I think so too, but what a fuss over a graphic in a movie🙄
@austin28424 жыл бұрын
Few people realize that Mosquito was THE plane of WW2.
@Braun304 жыл бұрын
A good friend of my parents was an aeronautical engineer who retired here in Switzerland in his old age. He was the one who explained how they built one of the best planes of WW2 in plywood as he had been one of those who designed it. I must have been 14 then, in the early 1970s.
@martinduckworth98374 жыл бұрын
My grandad flew in them: navigator, aerial reconnaissance. Stripped of guns and bombs it was the fastest thing in the sky. Cost him his hearing but he took some remarkable photos of bombing raid damage.
@k1200ltse4 жыл бұрын
THE multi-role combat aircraft of WW2. No question, no doubts.
@hoilst4 жыл бұрын
@@Braun30 Absolutely the best plane of WWII. Genius from conception to production. Didn't use any war-critical materials (only balsa, birch, and spruce). Because it was wood, it utilised sectors of industry that weren't being used much for the war: cabinet makers, boat builders, and ever piano factories. Manufacturing was dispersed from the very beginning - you simply could not bomb out the production line, because they were literally all over the country - not even Goering was stupid enough to launch a raid on a 12-man chair factory in a Yorkshire village. Construction techniques required no special tools or jogs - just the standard woodworking tools everyone had, and concrete moulds. From getting the plans and instructions, for example, Australia turned out its first Mosquito only eighty days later. Wood was better than monocoque in many ways, leading to a higher survivability. Hell, often explosive shells failed to detonate because it was too soft. You could scarfe joint on new wingtips, and often the Mossies would be flying the same day as they were repaired. Didn't fatigue as easily as metal, could absorb more shock - hence you could stick a 2lb-gun on it without it shaking to bits. Helped pioneer composite construction and new adhesives (including UV-cured glues). Was, in a way, slightly stealthy, since wood has a much lower radar return than metal. Was the fastest thing in the sky until jet aircraft. Pioneered low-level precision bombing, including taking out the radio station Goering was due to give a speech at in Berlin on the anniversary of the founding the Nazi party, and the Amiens prison raid. Was used for everything from bombing to recon to night fighting to anti-shipping to...transporting Niels Bohr out of Europe to go work on the atomic bomb. Was barely changed throughout the war because the design was so good from the start.
@Grubnar4 жыл бұрын
@@martinduckworth9837 "If the Germans try to intercept you ... just fly faster!"
@davecrupel28174 жыл бұрын
These are mosquitos. It's not a havoc because the elevators on these planes are straight. The Havoc's elevators has some dihederal. (They're angled upward) and the Havoc is smaller. It's not a b-25 because the B-25 had twin small vertical stabilizers. The Mosquito has 1 large vertical stab.
@michaelg19154 жыл бұрын
You're thinking of the B-25 with the twin stabs. The B-26 also had a single stab with a slight dihedral.
@davecrupel28174 жыл бұрын
@@michaelg1915 that's right. Changed it. Thanks for the correction!
@snufu10 жыл бұрын
I do believe they're mosquito's not B-26 Marauders
@DeltaSniperZRR10 жыл бұрын
Why do you think they are Mosquito's?
@snufu10 жыл бұрын
Pause the film at 23 seconds, I noticed three blades props, unless I am mistaken, B-26's had four bladed. They sound like Merlin engines. Although I could be stood corrected 😊
@DeltaSniperZRR10 жыл бұрын
Michael Taylor Good spot. Like you I spotted 3 blades, the B-26 has four like you said. Still, I think the editors of these scene made the planes as B-26s, just because it is an American bomber & Band of Brothers is an American production. Also, the size of the Mosquito is smaller then the planes in the video. Look at this photo; www.historyofwar.org/Pictures/b-26_formation_france.jpg I see many similarities.
@snufu10 жыл бұрын
Lt col speirs that is a very close resemblance, but having looked again at the footage, the siluette of the aircraft with engine trouble fits a mosquito, the sloping tail section and rounded nose.
@DeltaSniperZRR10 жыл бұрын
Michael Taylor True, but the shape of the planes at 0:01 in the background look so familiar to B-26s in the photo I posted in my other comment. On the other hand, if the editors of the planes really made those 3 blades on purpose, than they are probably de Havilland Mosquitos.
@tanyano96 жыл бұрын
Easy way to tell they are supposed to be Mosquito's is the flat tailplane........The Douglas A-20 Havoc has a dihedral tail, easy to sport when viewed from the rear, these a/c are flat when viewed from behind.....Add to that the A-20 have radials which does not sound like a Merlin like these do.......100% Mosquito's.....
@sillyone520625 жыл бұрын
Wing shape is all wrong for a Mossie.
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
@@sillyone52062 Except its not.
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
@@sillyone52062 Nope, you need to practice your aircraft recognition skills.
@BatMan-xr8gg4 жыл бұрын
@@sillyone52062 Wrong, the wing shape shows it is a Mossie.
@hughjohnson26744 жыл бұрын
So do the inline engines..........
@TedVinz74 жыл бұрын
I don't think you can categorically say the nose or the engine nacelles are seen clearly enough from this angle to say, "short nose" or "Merlin engines." To me, the deciding factor is that there is no dihedral in the horizontal stabilizer - only seen on the de Havilland. Also, the A-26 Invader is doubly disqualified because the Rudder on it is squared off. Mosquito, A-20 and B-26 have rounded vertical stabilizers.
@toad32223 жыл бұрын
What
@pheels3 жыл бұрын
Im going to go with b26 because of the high wing loading wings which looks like the aircraft have.
@48billy03 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't like to meet you in a pub.
@edvarlacerda95643 жыл бұрын
Mmore likely to be Marauders or Havocs but not Mostquitos. Mosquitos have a smaller engine cover since there are not radial engines
@kieranoberhansli10543 жыл бұрын
Always noticed the one with the failing engine since its been in combat
@niix.27325 жыл бұрын
Clearly A10 Warthogs
@simunator5 жыл бұрын
lol can you imagine how much ass a flight of warthogs would have dished out throughout the campaign?
@ImperatorKernow4 жыл бұрын
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
@RedditzGG4 жыл бұрын
It ain't a P-47 (aka, the Warthog's ancestor) 😂
@badlaamaurukehu6 жыл бұрын
They're gonna hit something.
@scottdavis35085 жыл бұрын
The Outlaw Josey Wales
@ramblingadventures4 жыл бұрын
Anyone who even has minimal aircraft recognition skills knows they're Mosquitos. Bostons...LOL, those have dihedral in the tail. At :23, that is UNQUESTIONABLY a Mosquito. You have to not have eyes to think otherwise. There is no other aircraft of WW2 with that wing/tail/fuse design.
@bobgibb27814 жыл бұрын
I've watched it several times and then it occurred to me that everyone is arguing about a load of CGI pixels . I know my WW2 aircraft and I cannot conclusively say exactly what aircraft they are meant to represent .
@leekent35874 жыл бұрын
They are as the title says - de Havilland Mosquitos also nicknamed the wooden wonder because it was made out of wood , they were used in all kinds of roles within the RAF, illuminating targets for the heavy bombers nicknamed Pathfinders, then they were using in destroying V-1 Rocket sites and also used in the ground attack role equipped with bombers & rockets and also as a fighter-bomber too , it was a multi-role aircraft.
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
They are Mosquitos. I have no idea why people keep debating this.
@BlueonGoldZ4 жыл бұрын
@@EinundzwanzigPanzer Maybe because they could be easily mis-identified as a B-26 Marauder. The last plane with the engine failure, the wings do look like a Mosquito's wings but like I said, the planes look very similar to Marauders.
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
@@BlueonGoldZ And yet they are not. Who cares what planes they look similiar to? If you look closely, you will notice they are Mosquitos. If you are in doubt even after looking closely at them, then as I said you are not as good at aircraft recognition as you think. At this point this is starting feel like arguing wether the sky is blue is blue or not...
@modernschoolatlas4 жыл бұрын
Mosquitos, it's bloomin' obvious to the rest of us.
@wwmproductions57877 жыл бұрын
I think those are dehavland mosquitoes
@vincentkermorgant3 жыл бұрын
They are CGI so they can be whatever ;) But the shape screams Mossies
@johnleney95413 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the CGI muffs it up a bit. They're not actual planes, they're approximations of Allied twin-engined planes - hence the debate I guess
@warrenchambers48193 жыл бұрын
Is it a Mosquito or is it a B-26 Marauder? Actually it's neither it's CG so not actually either one. Looks close to a Marauder but lacks v type horizonal stabilizers and is flat like the Mosquito. However it's fuselage is fat and round unlike the slimmer Mosquito. So they're what ever you wish, you get to pick it. So let's reply with your choice and talley up the count in say 1yr?
@Theakker3B4 жыл бұрын
This is your favorite scene???
@robertlong70333 жыл бұрын
Can't tell for certain but are you' sure that they're not B-26's? Either way there's only a couple of either still flying so it could have simply been a couple twin engine aircraft of whatever model they can make to look like WWII aircraft .Even 20+ years ago finding enough of the real deal and somebody willing to grant them an airworthiness certificate and somebody brave enough to fly one would have been a daunting task.
@edwinramirez77773 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that the first 5 planes are B-26 Marauder they have longer wings but the last 3 had shorter wings may be a de Havilland Mosquito.
@runertje55053 жыл бұрын
people be playing war thunder for 3 days and call out any plane over confident they're right
@oscarsusan38344 жыл бұрын
Judging from the comments I see you failed to see the F117.
@grahamstubbs49624 жыл бұрын
Nobody expects the F117
@JohnJ4694 жыл бұрын
@@grahamstubbs4962 That is it's main weapon, surprise and fear...
@Cage2053K5 жыл бұрын
Those are mosquitoes
@daniellastuart31455 жыл бұрын
ya if there flying that low defiantly would of been RAF then probably meant to Mosquito
@JohnJ4694 жыл бұрын
Just to add to the fire. They were British planes. You can tell because nobody was hiding.
@keraptisblackrazor26584 жыл бұрын
Internet Movie Plane Database thinks they are B-26 Marauders
@deanfawcett20854 жыл бұрын
B-26 has dihedral stabilisers. Definitely Mosquitos
@dearthworm3 жыл бұрын
Since everyone is debating about the realism of this scene, assuming they were Mosquitoes, is it realistic that a dozen or more Mosquitoes would go and return on a sortie as a group? It is my understanding that at this phase of the war the Mosquitoes squadrons (at least some of them anyway) were tasked with ranger patrols, most often at night, to attack anything that moved behind German lines. It would not make sense that a whole squadron would be seen together in a loose formation.
@dLimboStick4 жыл бұрын
Mosquitos. Without a doubt.
@jonallen6034 жыл бұрын
Band of Brothers? Isn’t the clip from A Bridge too Far?
@darrenrosenberg52894 жыл бұрын
James McAvoy wasn't in 'A Bridge Too Far'.
@jonallen6034 жыл бұрын
Yep ur right. Thought it was Ryan O’Neal at the front, but definitely McAvoy, who wasn’t even born when BtF was released.
@darrenrosenberg52894 жыл бұрын
@@jonallen603 I can see the resemblance to O'Neal now you mention it. Good call.
@jcpeckerhead53094 жыл бұрын
Not one mosquito passed
@BatMan-xr8gg4 жыл бұрын
Rubbish, they were Mossies. The Wing Shape and the Tapered Fuselage shows it is a Mossie.
@WizzRacing4 жыл бұрын
Wonder if they hit anything.. They don't miss....Best plane of WWII..........
@bigfella66294 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts, they would of hit what they were after. Probably the most versatile aircraft of WW2
@TheWinnergroup3 жыл бұрын
These planes r not mosquitoes.
@brain84846 жыл бұрын
RAF Mosquito
@Bob-vy7lw3 жыл бұрын
B-26's
@alexbowman75825 жыл бұрын
If instead of going for the Ruhr via Holland we had attacked into Germany and penetrated far in the war would have finished sooner.
@warhawk95665 жыл бұрын
If we only built a million atom bombs we could've ended the war without any Americans dying at all
@theflyluciano78775 жыл бұрын
@@warhawk9566 Dude, not cool. There should be no atom bombs at all. That shit on Japan was a war crime
@XxTheGreatDestroyerx5 жыл бұрын
KoopaPlayz nope. Those bombs saved the lives of millions of people, US soldiers and Japanese soldiers and civilians. They also arguably prevented them from ever being used again. To argue that the US is somehow wrong for winning a war it didn’t start is some pansy revisionist history pussy shit.
@mickdyer53104 жыл бұрын
Thats what Horrocks said, But Eisenhower Let Monty have a go. If Patton and Bradley were allowed to go, then Yes, the war in the West MIGHT have ended sooner. But there were a lot of Politics involved.
@alexbowman75824 жыл бұрын
@@mickdyer5310 Eisenhower was essentially a logistics officer more to do with supplies than actual fighting (like Germany’s Paulus) but he was the perfect man for the job. He juggled egos and politics very well.
@jamesyak525 жыл бұрын
Mosquitos...
@DonDon-df5ie3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if they hit something, dam right they have, they're Mosquitoes!
@edwinramirez77773 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure that the first 5 planes are B-26 Marauder they have longer wings but the last 3 had shorter wings may be a de Havilland Mosquito.
@Jibriltz7 жыл бұрын
Definitely RAF Mosquitoes. Americans never have been very good at recognising allied aircraft...
@lampofexperience62966 жыл бұрын
lol and british humour sadly gets overlooked by us yanks as well.
@shadowdeslaar5 жыл бұрын
Hey fuck you. Buddy... Lmfao right now cause your right lol
@moarliekmirite4 жыл бұрын
plane go brrrrrrrr
@thorbutimok55384 жыл бұрын
The places were A 20 Havocs for sure, not Mosquito's.
@hadorstapa4 жыл бұрын
Havocs have a much slenderer profile for the fuselage and very different, angular tailplanes. These have the much rounder bodies of Mozzies and flat, rounded tailplanes.
@maxzzyzx80384 жыл бұрын
Notice the modern power poles
@darrenrosenberg52894 жыл бұрын
All I see are telephone poles.
@jkorshak4 жыл бұрын
You know, they had telephone poles 75 years ago. They'd been around for decades by that point.
@krashd4 жыл бұрын
They are telegraph poles (aka phone lines) but even if they were power poles how the hell did you think people managed to get electricity or communications in the 1940's? They obviously had to use poles...
@maxzzyzx80384 жыл бұрын
@@krashd it's a f -ing movie it's not real those poles are modern. If they were 1940s they would have glass insulators not porcelain.
@jkorshak4 жыл бұрын
@@maxzzyzx8038 How can you tell they are porcelain when they are in silhouette? I'm not saying the show's production designers were so anal retentive they definitely used glass insulators so to be absolutely accurate for what amounts to about 3 seconds of a shot's background, but how anal retentive do you have to be to just assume the stupid insulators up on a telephone pole you can't really see that well just have to have been anachronisms? Get a life, bruh.
@richardgoold33067 жыл бұрын
RAF Mosquito's mate
@Theakker3B3 жыл бұрын
0:20 Taped grenades
@johns52633 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine today’s generation getting pulled off the couch at 17-25 yrs old and 2 weeks later you’re going through this shit? Dog fights in the air, tank shells going off, plans falling out the sky adding by you. Forever and always will be men of men generation. R.I.P ggpa. 145th inf div. stationed in Northern Africa, Italy, France. came home with shrapnel in his back and shot 3 times. Died on his 100th bday. He was a bad ass
@Ecthaelyon3 жыл бұрын
To me, these aircraft are just generic CGI allied aircraft. The engine nacelles are indicative of radial engines. The wing form is definitely not Mosquito. The engine note is not RR Merlin, to my ears at least. Only the producers and CGI artists can tell us what they are supposed to be. In my view, these aircraft are a nod to ALL the Allied aircrews by presenting a generic aircraft shape with D-Day stripes. Just my opinion.
@oriamir89944 жыл бұрын
What they really are is CGI, the rest of it in the comments are all guesses.
@hughjohnson26744 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@mashbury4 жыл бұрын
Messerschmitt ! ( sits back and waits for a reply from a fellow film buff 😎)
@hughjohnson26743 жыл бұрын
Chocolate cake!
@billboth48144 жыл бұрын
Look like B-26s in the film. IDK whether Mosquitos or B-26s would have been more likely in the real event.
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
Nope, not flying at such low level. And it doesn't matter anyway, since the planes in question are in fact Mosquitos.
@billboth48144 жыл бұрын
@@EinundzwanzigPanzer Don't look like Mosquitos. In 1944, the actual planes were probably Bostons AKA A-20 Havocs. weaponsandwarfare.com/2016/09/21/air-support-for-market-garden-i/
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter if it realisticly would have been one plane or the other. The planes in THIS scene are clearly Mosquitos. Look at the shape of the fuselage, the horisontal stabilizers and the trailing edge of the wings. Those. Are. Mosquitos. If you think those are Bostons, then you need to get your eyes checked, or you simply suck at aircraft recoqnition. It might very well be that Bostons would have been the realistic choice of aircraft, but alas the makers of BoB chose Mosquitos.
@billboth48144 жыл бұрын
@@EinundzwanzigPanzer According to this, they were B-26s. Likely would have been computer generated rather than actual aircraft. In the actual battle, they were probably Havocs. www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Band_of_Brothers#Martin_B-26_Marauder
@EinundzwanzigPanzer4 жыл бұрын
@@billboth4814 And that is clearly wrong. Look the tail of B-26. It has a tail turret and much fatter fuselage in generel. The wings are higher mounted and the trailing edge of the wings have a less dramatic angle. So whoever maintains that wiki clearly is no aviation buff either. Those are Mosquito, and yes obivously they are computer generated. The Dehavilland Mosquitos were probably chosen because BoB partly was shot and produced on a lot which used to house the HQ of the De Havilland Aircraft Corporation, which invented and produced the Musquito.
@rickklein77923 жыл бұрын
You are all nuts. Them are Zeros.
@oskarrunhaar66077 жыл бұрын
They were Marauders.
@krashd4 жыл бұрын
James McAvoy gurning away at the end of the video.
@pendragon583 жыл бұрын
Look like Dakota's to me.
@joseavila40528 жыл бұрын
then an hour later half of them get shot down or damaged by the Germans using the flak 38 20mm
@paulmckenna24433 жыл бұрын
Looks like a B26 to me. Fat bodies
@Xyzabc9984 жыл бұрын
they are mosquitoes, of course they did.
@AvgDude4 жыл бұрын
Market Garden = Monty’s Clusterf***
@spunkospunko48004 жыл бұрын
I know it’s a debate about a film but for me ten pence worth,engines are not inboard enough for mossies
@petemitchell85259 жыл бұрын
actually those are a-26 invaders.. the a-20 havoc was obsolete by the time Market Garden happened.
@fubar123458 жыл бұрын
They're not b-26's, the tail is all wrong.
@mikkel066h4 жыл бұрын
Those are Mosquitoes. If you look up pictures of them you can clearly see it by the wings, tail and engines. Plus just because a plane was "Obsolete" does not mean that it was removed from action. It takes a long time to replace planes. So the A-20's still flew until the end of the war. No reason to scrap a perfectly good plane and have to retrain crews.