Lady Jane's story is one that broke my heart because she was only guilty by association and bloodline. She never did anything that warrant such a death so young. She should be talked about more because she was literally a pawn that was controlled by men with evil intentions.
@jennifermoriarty21885 жыл бұрын
She refused to listen to Mary's terms...and therefore died. Plus she asserts her power while queen. So no victim of men.....
@lisakaz355 жыл бұрын
@@jennifermoriarty2188 I bet she realized she'd be killed if she tried to beg off of it, from any number of people. Do you really think she could surrender and survive Mary Tudor, who burned far more ppl than her father?
@lisaellis97494 жыл бұрын
Don' t forget her ambitous parents, they had a hand in her demise.
@anthonywarren98854 жыл бұрын
When Henry died he made it an act of parliament that the line of succession was Edward, Mary, and then Elizabeth. So by law Jane Grey wasn't supposed to be Queen. Jane Grey knew what she was doing.
@gidzmobug23234 жыл бұрын
@@anthonywarren9885 The line if succession: Edward, Mary, Elizabeth, Frances (Duchess of Suffolk/daughter of Henry's sister Mary), Lady Jane The idea of putting Jane on the throne? The Duke of Northumberland. Edward was supposed to be ruling under a regency council, as per Henry VIII's will. This will set out the succession; it was Northumberland's idea to change it. Mary he disliked because she was a Catholic; Elizabeth was strong-willed enough that she would not be ruled by him. Frances was persuaded to renounce her rights in Jane's favor. I do not think Jane wanted any part of the plan. In that time, it was the father who arranged the marriage of his daughter; she was just expected to do as her father wanted.
@ZiggyWhiskerz6 жыл бұрын
I feel really really bad for Jane. None of this was her fault. She shouldn't have been killed. Truly an innocent bystander. Poor thing.
@ingridlooze38395 жыл бұрын
Was there not a song in the 6ties named lady Jane?
@nancyhanson56205 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@jennifermoriarty21885 жыл бұрын
She asserted her power and took control. No need to feel bad about her..not a victim
@anastasiaisabella73545 жыл бұрын
@@jennifermoriarty2188 Jane was manipulated by those around her
@jonp38905 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Poor darling, I think she would’ve been much happier left to her books and scholarship.
@laurafreeman78405 жыл бұрын
Jane was a child with narcissists for parents. They wanted power and their children paid the ultimate price. A lesson for all parents who use their children to manipulate in any society.
@anthonywarren98854 жыл бұрын
When Henry died he made it an act of parliament that the line of succession was Edward, Mary, and then Elizabeth. So by law Jane Grey wasn't supposed to be Queen.
@Veronica-bc6pp4 жыл бұрын
Look at Aaron Hernandez his family wanted him to go to nfl he paid the ultimate price
@yunjiehong46494 жыл бұрын
Anthony Warren Does Edward VI’s will legal? Before his died, both Mary and Elizabeth are illegitimate
@Kille4834 жыл бұрын
@@anthonywarren9885 But didn't Edward legally change it. If so then his will would count and not the previous king
@mangot5894 жыл бұрын
@@anthonywarren9885 Yes. But the king gets to do what HE wants. Henry VIII doesn’t get to decide what happens after he dies, for the next hundred years, even though isn’t that what all kings/dads want? Now, if Lady Janes’ father in law hadn’t had been so greedy, and so obviously jockeyed his son to be the king, the plot may have possibly worked. And according to Henry VIII, she would have been next, after her mother’s line. (After Mary, Elizabeth, males heir, blah).
@terryrogers78995 жыл бұрын
Kind Henry VIII married two Anne's. Anne Boleyn who was beheaded, and later, he married Anne of Cleves, a German aristocratic lady. As soon as the king saw her, he disliked her, and she most likely disliked him as well. Knowing what happened to his first Anne, she happily agreed to have the marriage annulled 7 months later, and she was given the title, "The Kings' beloved sister". And she lived a happy life for that time in her own home she was given, ate with the royal family, and the king's children loved her. She died shortly after Mary's coronation. She was known by all, including her servants, as kind and generous.
@pamelaalsop77724 жыл бұрын
2 Anne's, 3 Katherine's, & one Plain Jane! Lol....
@sherilynfryia7564 жыл бұрын
Terry Rogers 7
@alcuardandclaudekickass60374 жыл бұрын
He married Jane Seymour.... Jane Grey was his neice...... She was even thought of for Edward...
@antheiheiant4 жыл бұрын
Anne of Cleves and Anne Boleyn aren't their real names: Catherine of Aragon = Catalina de Aragón (spanish) Anne Boleyn = Anne de Bóléyn (french, spoken: Anne de Bulö) Anne of Cleves = Anna von Kleve (german)
@pillowprincess36734 жыл бұрын
@@antheiheiant I don't think that English speaking people know how to pronounce "ö". It's not in their alphabet. Btw, it was custom for Royal brides to change their names after their marriage, if they went to a foreign country. But I also like to think of them as Catalina and Anna :)
@lexigrimhaive5 жыл бұрын
Jane’s life before she was proclaimed queen was by no means carefree. It was atrocious. Her parents were immensely abusive to her.
@anitastone1685 жыл бұрын
I remember reading that her Mother used to beat her with a broom handle. No wonder she wanted to become a Nun!!! Barbaric lot !!
@anitastone1684 жыл бұрын
@Alice Moore their behaviour was really quite beyond our comprehension! !! ....and these were the 'educated' ones ??!!
@angelandhoudini10364 жыл бұрын
@@anitastone168 Most of those are rumors, but she definitely was emotionally and mentally abused, if not physically!
@assiaelmabrouki55523 жыл бұрын
My gosh I remember to have found a source that explains that her mother was especially abusive to her: she would always brutally beat her for the slightest disagreements. When Jane openly refused to be married, it's said that both her parents attacked her. Horrible...
@sensiblecryptid44065 жыл бұрын
I think the first thing I assume before researching this era is that everything very likely King Henry the 8th's fault.
@summerssums50224 жыл бұрын
Pretty much
@johnduarte14284 жыл бұрын
You are sensible.
@angelandhoudini10364 жыл бұрын
@Voracious Reader I mean, he did die making his son the king, and he DID marry Jane Seymour so...... Technically it's his fault!
@ninjabrianseyebrows66224 жыл бұрын
Yep accurate
@akal87754 жыл бұрын
No I blame it on generations before him. Because had Richard not killed the princes in the tower AKA Elizabeth Woodvilles sons they Would have become kings not Henry the 8th. I would even go as far is to blame it on Henry VII because he was a useless king and that's why The war of the roses happen
@libertyvictorbishop76955 жыл бұрын
Lady Jane Grey's story is quite inspiring and this documentary really brought it to life! I love that she made her husband Guilford a duke and not a king. "this queen don't need a king."
@ebonyloveivory4 жыл бұрын
Normally they do not make the husband the king because it would mean that he is the ruler of the nation and their descendants would take his name/titles/house. The queen is the legitimate heir and ruler in her own right. The husband could only be a prince at most or a duke. Just like how husbands of royal princesses would not stand to be in line for the throne either.
@assiaelmabrouki55523 жыл бұрын
That's kinda understandable too becausz Guildford didn't have direct blood relation to the royal family, unlike Jane. She was the fair successor to the throne, aside from Mary and Elizabeth since they were both kept away from the ruling position for a while.
@annacostello51812 жыл бұрын
Well there were 8 Henrys
@chipwalter44902 жыл бұрын
In the show they say this decision may have made her seem more independent, and not the mindless puppet, therefore making her seem more guilty when the scheme went bust. However, I think she was doomed either way. From her point of view she knew her side could loose the struggle. If she had given him a crown as a king, this also could be used as against her. Because her opponents could then say she was guilty of complete acquiescence. Also she personally may have feared that her father-in-law poisoned the previous teenage head-of-state. By not allowing that man’s son to be king outright, she may have felt she was accomplishing a little bit of self perseverance. It’s impossible to know any of it really, on top of the fact that her parents also were documented as very physically abusive and manipulating. So “her decision” may have even been the will of her psychotic father.
@visam286 жыл бұрын
She was an enlightened being. Although she only held the position for a short time she tried to make positive changes. This story always amazed me.
@claudiosaltara70035 жыл бұрын
What amazes me that that. These families are immortalized in histories after the pain they wrought on people.
@ES-nq8uu4 жыл бұрын
How is that any different from Jack the Ripper or any serial killer in this age? We immortalize the wrong people. Instead of the killers getting the attention, it should go to the ones responsible for ending thier terror enduced reign.
@ingridlenz39784 жыл бұрын
@@ES-nq8uu Yes I see your point,,,sadly,except through conjecture,Jack the Ripper was never identified. Nor was he caught,,,right? He simply seemed to Stop Killing
@robertoortiz60884 жыл бұрын
9⁹
@ddivar81493 жыл бұрын
thats the way it was. Just be glad you live now.
@jsphillip603 жыл бұрын
Monday morning quarterbacking, as we say in the States. They were a product of their times and beliefs. That's history. Hindsight is 20/20, as we should know.
@fijklmn95535 жыл бұрын
Isn't it confusing and frustrating to have many Mary and Margaret in just one family
@krdiaz80265 жыл бұрын
They probably had nicknames.
@benedictewrstad83795 жыл бұрын
They all had different «surnames»
@Fallenfromgrace19905 жыл бұрын
French were the same way. So was Austria. Marie was very common so they always went by Maria and then their middle name (Marie Antoinette, Marie Therese)
@gidzmobug23235 жыл бұрын
Mary was a fairly common name for the time.
@Incognitofrito15 жыл бұрын
That and all the Annes & Catherines King Henry VIII married! 🙈
@EmpressMermaid5 жыл бұрын
As a fan of alternate history, I wonder what kind of queen Jane would have been. She was already showing herself to be no docile pushover, but didn't have time to develop herself. Would her reign be similar to that of Elizabeth?
@conillet5 жыл бұрын
Jane was intellectually brilliant but a fervent protestant. I doubt that her reign would have been as - relatively - tolerant in religious matters as Elizabeth's turned out to be.
@mdiddio3 жыл бұрын
@@conillet She did push for many social reforms for the common people and women, including education. I highly doubt she would have been as unmerciful as you think.
@BeccasaurousRex2702 жыл бұрын
@@mdiddio what all did she push for in her 9 day reign?
@mdiddio2 жыл бұрын
@@BeccasaurousRex270 Quite a few reforms that benefited the poor and middle classes, including education of both girls and boys, some basic labor laws, etc, etc, etc. Why don't you look it up?
@garthst.claire34596 жыл бұрын
I have no problem accepting Jane Grey as a strong individual, but I really disagree with that guy's explanation "Well her cousins were headstrong, so she can't have been demure!" Nonsense, people don't necessarily have the same character, only because they are related!
@Tony.H036 жыл бұрын
I don't think he necessarily meant it's to do with their genetic relation, but rather the similar circumstances and times they were brought up in. All were educated, all were exposed to Tudor inequalities, all were exposed to some strong women defying those inequalities succesfully. I think that's his argument.
@nancyhanson56205 жыл бұрын
right!
@lisakaz355 жыл бұрын
I don't know how strong she really is. Maybe in limited places where she could assert something but she's been beat down much of her life and never got to control much. She was told who to marry, she was told to be queen, etc. I think she realized she had to go thru with it to survive, if she was to survive.
@Jane.Doe.5 жыл бұрын
@ Garth St. Claire Yes, I absolutely agree with everything you say in your comment! What a rediculous idea to assume family relations are in fact, even slightly similar to one another in opinions, thoughts, compassion and definitely religious alliance.
@jennifermoriarty21882 жыл бұрын
@@lisakaz35 Did assert her power as queen though
@frenchiegirlintheusa6 жыл бұрын
LOL LOL LOL I laughed so hard because the duke thought his son would be king. Only to have the table turned and Jane said no for her husband to be king he can be a duke lol. You go Jane.
@michelledudley45156 жыл бұрын
Both Lady Jane Grey and her husband Guilford Dudley are both my relatives. I haven't watched the whole video yet. I believe she was a pawn and so was her husband. I agree that she should have the right to say no to her husband becoming king.
@Benjamin-zr4yw6 жыл бұрын
@Wisewoe Tiswell different times different people. The whole country is in chaos and it's very likely that the queen would die in child labour. Also how many male king were thrown off the throne? she was weak as a queen that was the reason why she died.
@danastumpe89926 жыл бұрын
@@Benjamin-zr4yw oh my god do you realize the whole thing only took place because all the men died in the first place? 'It's not sexism, its women dying in childbirth' Is that why they ignored like 10 woman heirs, some of which already went through childbirth? lmao
@Benjamin-zr4yw6 жыл бұрын
@@danastumpe8992 oh i see you can't read aswell. Please read my comment again and tell me at which point your brain couldn't process the information anymore.
@corneliali77476 жыл бұрын
and he was like "no king no sex!" as if she was eager to do it with him.
@Olivia-iv7xj5 жыл бұрын
"No king, no sex." I'll use that excuse next time
@alohalivin5565 жыл бұрын
Broer 😂
@ArizonaRed5 жыл бұрын
*wink
@thedarkstranger9634 жыл бұрын
Too many next times for you, my dear.
@abeck79294 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@Redrum1018963 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@annazaman96576 жыл бұрын
So within a few months she was forced to marry, forced to become queen, then killed. Through no fault of her own. Such are the power games of men.
@rangersasc6 жыл бұрын
Really pisses me off
@LuisaD936 жыл бұрын
anna zaman most men feel superior and are hateful ppl as well as selfish. Fk em . Notice I said most men and not all so I don’t want to hear any shit .
@LuisaD936 жыл бұрын
Raymond Duke me too ! Such a young and promising and beautiful life she could have had .
@martinc.7206 жыл бұрын
Louise Reeves This happened in the 1550s and you’re saying that most men today are like that? Wow Look, there are assholes everywhere, I’ll give you that. But some women are too. To say that “most” of 3.5 billion people are hateful, and to say “f em” shows that your “opinion” is based on prejudice and nothing else.
@KarilynM6 жыл бұрын
Well since Mary didn’t want to kill her but Philip refused to come until she was beheaded
@JPMJPM5 жыл бұрын
I’m not even English, but Lady Jane is one of my very favorite monarchs ever.
@kaytlinjustis56436 жыл бұрын
I can never forget Lady Jane Grey. As a kid, I have read Nine Days a Queen, as well as the story of Bloody Mary, and I have the story of the latter's younger sibling. Queen Elizabeth. :)
@elenthora4426 жыл бұрын
They are truly amazing people.
@bulzlukay52204 жыл бұрын
This Mary....was is the same mary of scotts??
@MrCarolienSerno4 жыл бұрын
@@bulzlukay5220 no, this mary was the daughter of king henry. The other mary was the daughter of Margaret Henry's sister. Also the other sister of Henry is called Mary. Very confusing
@bulzlukay52204 жыл бұрын
@@MrCarolienSerno thank u for clarifyin.
@ChiNguyen-bc4kt4 жыл бұрын
I admire Jane. She was so small, yet she knew to protect her family's throne.
@linahansen62335 жыл бұрын
you guys make the best historical videos i have ever seen. narration is phenomenal and the background music is absolutely perfect, it sets the stage without drowning out any of the narration. the videos are clear and steady. i love this channel
@ritaree1232 жыл бұрын
Yes 😊
@HistoryLover15505 жыл бұрын
Ever since seeing Helena Bonham-Carter play the tragic queen, Jane Grey's story has intrigued me immensely. She was thrust into a monumental and dangerous position she neither aspired to or wanted. Her devotion to God and adherence to royal rights of inheritance I admire. Had it not been for Edward Seymour and her father, Jane would not have been forced to take on the role of queen, even though she seemed to come into her own as one. Her reign was as close to a real "Game of Thrones" scenario as History could get.
@toocoldtobother72715 жыл бұрын
When did she play Lady Jane I want to watch that
@BlendedBarbieDoll4 жыл бұрын
What film was this? I’d love to watch.
@assiaelmabrouki55523 жыл бұрын
@@BlendedBarbieDoll its called Lady Jane, a 1986 movie :)
@golden89722 жыл бұрын
She was so brilliant in that movie.
@DaniOnDemand6 жыл бұрын
"No, I'll make him a Duke." 🤔😂
@mariamaeperalta6 жыл бұрын
Off topic the one who played Queen Jane Grey is beautiful, she played the role well.
@nanonano036 жыл бұрын
That's fetus Helena Bonham Carter (i mean, tha one in the movie)... she's an amazing actress. ^_^
@mariamaeperalta6 жыл бұрын
@@nanonano03 thanks for the info😊
@elizabethalli12716 жыл бұрын
@@mariamaeperalta I question that the actress is Helena Bonham Carter...I think it is a different person. Whoever she is, you are so right, she is beautiful & did a good job.
@alicewilloughby43186 жыл бұрын
@@elizabethalli1271, I'm pretty sure the actress who played her in "Lady Jane" was Helena Bonham Carter. Remember she was a lot younger then (as were we all!)
@trenae776 жыл бұрын
@@alicewilloughby4318 You are correct and not - in the 1986 movie "Lady Jane" Helena Bonham Carter played her, but this is a different movie: www.imdb.com/title/tt7812452/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm
@user-tt5li8hf2f6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for doing this! I think the story and history of Queen Jane is amazing.
@greyedgerton28906 жыл бұрын
Finally some true looking into this tragedy. Poor child.
@stonew19275 жыл бұрын
As an American I was not taught anything about English royalty or European. Most Americans learn about the royals through movies. I'm not sure why, but I am suddenly very interested in the intrigues surrounding the British kings and queens. It's all so fascinating! And this is an excellent documentary series to learn from.
@Emilythematerialgurl Жыл бұрын
We were taught most basic really known ones like the king with many wives and queen of France who was beheaded by her own people
@TraciPeteyforlife4 жыл бұрын
Henry was a fool, his daughters were his greatest achievement.
@sontayatoemsook12663 жыл бұрын
Mary was no achiement
@mariandenk56383 жыл бұрын
@@sontayatoemsook1266 Mary turned into a cruel tyrant thanks to Henry’s paternal negligence, treatment of her mother, and defiance of the pope’s directives. When Henry established the Church of England declaring himself as its ruler he served her with the ultimate slap in the face. In short, Henry drove Mary crazy.
@assiaelmabrouki55523 жыл бұрын
@@mariandenk5638 i think it's safe to say that Henry VIII is one of the worst and most messed up rulers ever
@blancamarquez86973 жыл бұрын
Edward was also an achievement, it was just his reign was cut short and 6 years were not enough to prove his worth as king.
@allisonmarlow1842 жыл бұрын
Not to him. To him, they were his greatest failures. Or rather his wives greatest failings.
@nessieness54334 жыл бұрын
Irresistible suspense, this is so well made! I thoroughly enjoyed the presentation, it kept me nailed to my chair. Thank you!
@loricarter23944 жыл бұрын
I’m an American, but I love learning about English history. I’ve been bingeing on it since the quarantine started, lol. It’s very interesting to me.
@jazminjacobs4910Ай бұрын
Me too! It’s been over a year for me and I’m going through all the kings and queens
@remyn.91986 жыл бұрын
And this is why there should always be a separation of church and state. History has already dictated time and time again that when Religion is in power chaos ensues.
@OlsenJustin5 жыл бұрын
Remy N. It’s the state that creates the chaos and tyranny! The Soviet Union was a secular state and we all know how that ends. I mean this respectfully. You should take a closer look at history because it is malevolent states that will push for separation and will demonize religion. If the peasants are without common values it makes it easier for the state to get away with criminal behavior. Without common values there is no right or wrong and truth is subjective. The West was built on Christianity as its cornerstone and will become something very different without it.
@remyn.91985 жыл бұрын
@@OlsenJustin Are you kidding me, right now in America we've got supposed good Christians backing politicians who thinks it's ok to separate families and lock kids in cages where they are subject to both physical and sexual abuse. The Churches in America even though they are not supposed to are often backing politicians that will ensure their morals are put above the needs and wants of a country of ppl that may not even follow there religion. Right now several states are challenging abortion rights of women even though it is federally protected because the church wants everyone to believe life begins at conception even though the bible specifically says life begins at first breath which can very easily be translated to when the baby can survive outside the womb. You see where I'm going with this. Church and State should not mix when you have a country of mixed religions. It doesn't work.
@OlsenJustin5 жыл бұрын
Remy N. As an adult that was locked in a cage and separated from my parents I agree with you that children should be protected. I blame the parents of the children including my own. As far as abortion is concerned it’s the belief on the pro life side that unborn children have rights and that abortion is evil. Not even that the woman that abort their babies but the system itself. Once again look back at where planned parenthood started. It was started by a Uber racist who wanted to cleanse the world of blacks and Jews. It’s no accident that most abortion clinics are in poor black areas. It’s not just Christianity that is important. Most religions teach the same things. Respect your parents. Love the children. Don’t steal. Have faith and don’t turn to the dark side. It’s western religious values that are the foundation for your anger at children being abused. Even if you think religion is evil and silly. Look at Chinese culture. No religion and for years baby girls were murdered because of the one child policy. I agree with you on organized religion. It’s on the fundamentals of western religion where I disagree.
@remyn.91985 жыл бұрын
@@OlsenJustin Don't get me wrong, I'm no atheist, I just get riled up when ppl use religion as a weapon or a right to dictate the lives of others, it was never meant to be used it that way. I ALWAYS saw my faith and the bible as a guide book of morals to follow not to inflict my faith in others by force, which is what I saw here in this video. It is what I am seeing in my own country. Religion should not be used to opress others into submission under the guise that they are being liberated. Nor should ppl claim to be good ppl of faith who condone that type of behavior. There is a possibility in any type of organization, religious or not. I'm my country in my opinion religion is being used as a weapon to put bigots in power while stripping the rights of others. But that's just my opinion.
@OlsenJustin5 жыл бұрын
Remy N. I’m glad we could find common ground!
@christineshah73305 жыл бұрын
The Y chromosome in the Tudor lineage seems to be incompatible with life, while the X chromosomes create super healthy, smart women. 🤣
@WhtnyRs4 жыл бұрын
Karma lol
@zoratheexplorer21344 жыл бұрын
Also it is said that they had a lot of illegitimate males born by mistresses.
@robinlillian94714 жыл бұрын
The Tudor men had a gene that produced an immune reaction in pregnant women who didn't have it. It generally meant miscarriages after the first child, unless the fetus got the recessive gene. The rest is judgmental, ethnocentric SJW's who can't admit that women in history had faults, too. Older documentaries are a little more even handed.
@lesliejabine17834 жыл бұрын
@Oniket Interesing. Link, please?
@theresamanuka17184 жыл бұрын
@Oniket Yes, I'd love read it!
@crystalclear64116 жыл бұрын
Am so much fascinated by the middle ages mornachy.the complexities and suspense always seem to amaze me
@ingriddubbel84685 жыл бұрын
This takes place in the Renaissance.
@user-nz7si2cu6w5 жыл бұрын
Indeed! I wish i was Caucasian.
@anitastone1685 жыл бұрын
The Tudors were a particularly fascinating lot, I think.
@hankiedave4 жыл бұрын
Emeka Onwuchekwa same here and am a filipino.. never been or seen the british lands
@janvanmarle94664 жыл бұрын
Not medevial;the middle ages were from 400 until 1400
@rheanonjasmyne5 жыл бұрын
I love the Movie Lady Jane with Helena Bonham Carter...................
@laurawhite3033 жыл бұрын
Yyylgg crr yuiutuiu
@kayleerebekah48845 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately this is just one of many examples of an innocent women’s life being ruined by power hungry men Edit: Just want to say that I’m not blind to the fact that women were/are not perfect. However, I did write this comment over a year ago and my opinions and views have changed slightly. I do still believe Lady Jane Greys death would not have happened had she not listened to the men who wanted to keep their religion in power. But she did have her own faults. And Mary played a massive part in Janes death, obviously. I also believe that a lot of women at that time were viewed by these powerful men as tools to be used for their own personal gain. Which is exactly what happened here
@justanobodyonyoutube35805 жыл бұрын
Kaylee Rebekah and Anne Boleyn right
@tai-yomaruno36804 жыл бұрын
She was killed by Mary, a woman. All the girl power feminists in the comment section seem to forget that
@ES-nq8uu4 жыл бұрын
Women were no saints then either. Do not assume that all power plays were by men alone.
@jamesfraser41735 жыл бұрын
Helen is another lady who can bring history to life!
@xEEEa7iu2313 жыл бұрын
i hope instead of giving her praise and calling her a strong woman, people extend more empathy and consideration to the fact that she had just turned 16 and had to literally fight for her life under the pressure of old men telling her what to do (and with no regard to her well being either, they clearly just wanted to reap benefits and power for their own families). nobody deserves to go through what she did, and a "strong woman" doesn't have to be strong just because she endured this much pain. nobody deserves to go through that pain in the first place.
@diamondinthesky47712 жыл бұрын
"England's first Queen was Lady Jane Grey" Empress Matilda: "Oh come on."
@Kyleinasailing4 жыл бұрын
Lady Jane Grey knew exactly what the stakes were and was no innocent teenage bystander!!! She firmly believed in the Protestant cause. The letters she wrote were testiment to this and she wrote them to the end. She died bravely and with great dignity firmly convinced of her cause. She was both an example and a warning for Elisabeth.
@katiekress72873 жыл бұрын
It’s probably why Elizabeth didn’t marry, she saw how powerful men behaved or misbehaved if you prefer.
@jennifermoriarty21882 жыл бұрын
@@katiekress7287 That an they carry disease lol
@mechengr17312 жыл бұрын
But she didn't really have a choice. This had been done to her, and so she did what she could to survive and make some positive changes
@atlboo984 жыл бұрын
Wow. This documentary was amazing!!!!! Very well done. 1 of the best on English royalty that I've seen.
@nanonano036 жыл бұрын
Poor dear Jane. She was just a victim.
@meowypotter12466 жыл бұрын
The narrator looks like an older Hermione Granger. I keep expecting her to say that she read in Hogwarts, a History.
@mariannea.21406 жыл бұрын
She is reminding me of an older Emma Stone as well.
@tartnouveau36526 жыл бұрын
So the minister of magic is giving us a history lesson?
@kimberlymatott24725 жыл бұрын
😂😂💯
@ooriijiin5 жыл бұрын
I thought I heard her say “its levi-o-sa not levi-yow-sah-
@shysensei23485 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@xavier_zxavier_z96484 жыл бұрын
when i was a young boy, i saw a portrait on the cyber by inadvertently. at that moment i was like: "oh my, she’s looks like an angel, who is she?" however, when i found out what happened about her final destiny, my tears were coming. the achievement of the first British queen would be the weapon that killed her, no one can imagine.
@heidihinter49614 жыл бұрын
We need more Helen Castor!! Fabulous host.
@josiefarnam91556 жыл бұрын
I honestly would love to see a documentary about her sister, Lady Katherine Grey... There's honestly not much at all about her but her story is even more heartbreaking thanks to Elizabeth I
@Cypresssina5 жыл бұрын
Yes please!
@tess45152 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I was enthralled by this story, poor girl of circumstance
@deaustin40185 жыл бұрын
Mary is depicted here with a sly, perhaps conniving smirk. I don't really think that works. I'd picture her more as righteous, angry certainty and determination - quite as I would picture Jane.
@patriciajrs466 жыл бұрын
There time was very different than now. When I watch things about powerful women I realize that my English and Scottish ancestors were hardy and helped make me who I am.
@elenthora4426 жыл бұрын
Patricia, understatement of the year!
@maryfrump79373 жыл бұрын
After finally finding out who my Ancestors were I found that I am not fond of many of them but they had strength and conviction.
@Nevada_Dan5 жыл бұрын
England, you have some SERIOUSLY messed up history.
@Grenadier3115 жыл бұрын
Messed up in comparison with what other nations?
@24yearsago644 жыл бұрын
I think all country's history are messed up..
@johnny63ism4 жыл бұрын
@@Grenadier311 There are many nations actually. Just in Europe people are ignorant about other civiliations. I love history and I enjoy these series a lot. I read a lot of european literature, including historic romances. I find history of every country very interesting and I can say I know history of europe quite well. This gave me possibility to make comparisons and conclusions of my own. And I'm proud to say, I come from one of the oldest christian country. We never had inquisition, Our church was never so brutal and dark minded as in Europe, we have never burnt and mordered people beacuse of the religous reasons. One royal dynasty ruled for more then thousand years. Of coarse there were political scandals and brutality, but not in a such huge level as in Europe. Noblewoman were getting the same education as noblemen. Woman were not used or manipulated as in Europe or tudor era England. We had woman crowned as a king in 12th century and she was ruling king not the puppet. p.s. Please don't think that I m trying to offend your country, I do respect brittish culture and people enormously just when I think about history, I'd rather be a part of unknown little country.
@quinn0110 Жыл бұрын
I've been searching for some time a docu about Lady Jane Grey where historian are being interviewed. Nothing interests me until YT algo shows this!
@jackcookjr93413 жыл бұрын
This story would make a great mini series.
@CoxJoxSox6 жыл бұрын
Jane Grey at 15 was in no way more educated than Mary and Elizabeth - both who grew up with scholars as educators.
@kristinmurrayphd6 жыл бұрын
Nick Doe You are right! I would say that ALL the Tudor ladies were highly educated.
@leanie96606 жыл бұрын
Lady Jane was educated with Elizabeth and Edward. She was their cousin. Apparently, she was very studious.
@KarilynM6 жыл бұрын
She was very religious in her studies. Elizabeth could learn languages like no one else
@haileypike12135 жыл бұрын
elizabeth and mary were named bastards for a large chunk of their lives so they didnt always have the best education. if you compaire janes education at 15 with marys at 15 and elizabeths at 15, janes education was much more advanced
@milanamughal5 жыл бұрын
I was surprised they never mentioned that for a couple years Jane lived with the Seymour’s (Katherine Parr and Thomas Seymour) at the same time when Elizabeth was there. And they did share a classroom and tutors. Jane remained in the household after Katherine removed Elizabeth from her house and ordered her to reside elsewhere due to Thomas’ advances.
@stacyrussell4604 жыл бұрын
The actor portraying Northumberland in this series gives off a creepy Lenin vibe. Poor Lady Jane... she never stood a chance. Who knows if the monarchy would have lasted if she had actually remained sovereign. Alas, we shall never know.
@Yayyy.13.24 ай бұрын
Very, very sad I have been forgotten about!
@ajordzkim40595 жыл бұрын
when they chosen Mary.. they burned their own selves on fire cause Mary betrayed them..
@lynnoliver15956 ай бұрын
Beautifully executed and narration was amazing also. Thank you!
@janbadinski71266 жыл бұрын
Queen Jane was beaten into submission then was killed because of it.
@ladyv56556 жыл бұрын
On the upside, her vile father and father in law lost their lives, too. Queen Mary was actually reluctant to have Jane killed, and she didn't until after her slimy relatives tried to use Jane as the inspiration for Wyatt's rebellion in 1554. She knew they were using Jane, but believed that as long as Jane lived, she would be the rallying point of future rebellions.
@judyevancic49266 жыл бұрын
The humanity during that time was vicious and violent. Father’s were bullies towards their daughters and forced her brutally towards submission. Then she is hunted down and killed for becoming Queen instead of Mary.
@gidzmobug23236 жыл бұрын
@@ladyv5655 There was also the embassy from Spain, who was there on Philip's behalf. They basically informed Mary that the marriage was on hold till any usurpers were dealt with.
@CSharkBytes5 жыл бұрын
@@gidzmobug2323 As in non-Catholic usurpers.
@monapause81086 жыл бұрын
is it just me, or did anyone else notice the actor playing Northumberland looks like Vladamir Lenin? I wonder if he's played him in any Russian revolution documentaries.
@mariakelly56 жыл бұрын
He kind of reminded me of Patrick Stewart.
@bluestrife286 жыл бұрын
monapause thank you! I couldn’t think who he reminded me of.
@monapause81086 жыл бұрын
@@mariakelly5 nah. this would have had to have been filmed about 30-35 years ago for him to be the age that this actor looks.
@denisegeer85696 жыл бұрын
monapause Has has to work
@denisegeer85696 жыл бұрын
monapause Has has to work on
@stephaniequerel84024 жыл бұрын
Thats crazy that there still remains written words by Edward VI. Wow
@Marguerite215 жыл бұрын
It's very sad what happened to Lady Jane Grey. She didn't deserve to be condemned to death. I know that Edward reluctantly wrote in his will that Jane Grey is the one to have the Throne of England. But Jane Grey had no desire to become the Queen. As for Mary, she had no right to rebel and to put an end to Jane's life. Mary was the one who committed high treason. She even knew that Edward chose Jane to become the Queen. Not her. Both Mary and Jane's father are to be blamed greatly. I blame Jane's father because he abused Jane and he didn't take responsibility to protect her from her enemies. He even underestimated Mary's forces, and that's what got both Jane and himself killed. The reason I despise Mary it's because she killed Jane Grey. It's also because she became power hungry with an agenda to become a tyrant Queen against the Protestants.
@isaacwillis8618 Жыл бұрын
She technically had more of a right to the throne than Jane Grey did. Henry 8th named her in the succession behind Edward and his heirs, of which he had none.
@CoxJoxSox6 жыл бұрын
Every story of England involves drama and cut-throats
@goodgirlkay6 жыл бұрын
I am pretty sure that's the history of humanity.
@TheKirkby6 жыл бұрын
It's the way we like it lol
@grandmap33896 жыл бұрын
Its better to be a pee-on.
@elenthora4426 жыл бұрын
ain't it kewl?
@catspaw30925 жыл бұрын
It's like that all over.
@jphforex21516 жыл бұрын
Her famous brother Earl got into the tea business
@deaapollymi87336 жыл бұрын
That is one smart comment hahaha
@jphforex21516 жыл бұрын
@@deaapollymi8733 (c:
@Kaisumirose6 жыл бұрын
LOL funny but Earl Grey Tea came about in the 1800's
@fly896 жыл бұрын
😂 good one Sir!
@elenthora4426 жыл бұрын
lol! quit now! we are trying to be serious!
@faze_buendia95144 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the young king had made some public declaration or held an event to show off making Lady Jane his heir so the public knew his plans; would there still have been a battle between Lady Jane and Mary? A lot of the nobles and peasants went to Mary's side because they believed her to be the rightful heir, but if they knew that the young king had changed it, would they have accepted his decree and follow Lady Jane, or would they still fight for Mary to be on the throne?
@atamoura5 жыл бұрын
What a well done documentary!
@ma.eladiakrysnavillazor34755 жыл бұрын
I have always wondered how they smelled, it's weird but i am really curious about it
@Baitullmaqdis5 жыл бұрын
Rose water love...however you do set me thinking ... did the women of that era shave .... or they go au naturalle 🤔
@marlo85285 жыл бұрын
Me too. Lol. I always imagined it wasn't pleasant.
@krdiaz80265 жыл бұрын
By'tl Solomon No reason to shave. What for? They weren't going to wear a bikini. Shaving is cultural. Where I'm from, nobody is put off by a woman's hairy legs or full bush or even hairy back or chest. Ironically though underarms have to be hairless.
@anneoftheland16585 жыл бұрын
Probably bad
@anneoftheland16585 жыл бұрын
Search you tube Versailles, dirty lil secrets... its tells it all.
@crystalheart96 жыл бұрын
I wonder why they fight for a position that will get them killed.
@happybkwrm6 жыл бұрын
Good question.
@crystalheart96 жыл бұрын
I wondered about the women who were dying to marry Henry VIII and then they did die. I don't understand it. @@happybkwrm
@k_a_y_l_e_e6 жыл бұрын
when that much power is at stake, everyone thinks they will be the exception and it won't happen to them.
@crystalheart96 жыл бұрын
Yea, I think you are exactly right. Somehow they think it won't happen to them. Even King Henry's wives would push him to the limit and think they could get away with it. @@k_a_y_l_e_e
@LuisaD936 жыл бұрын
crystalheart9 these wives never ,ever pushed the king to his limits. One- it wasn’t allowed and secondly he was too much a punk to ever have allowed that. He was notoriously narcissistic and misogynistic to even think about letting a woman push him in any way whatsoever.
@nikol8245 жыл бұрын
I don't know how I got here at first I was watching kpop now this ........not regretting though it's very interesting
@fayeo.34765 жыл бұрын
Same thing with me...
@dalyenouq85435 жыл бұрын
same lol
@prettykittywifu57104 жыл бұрын
Baki Baki ni ore ...Nani wo?
@rheanonjasmyne5 жыл бұрын
So much innocence has been destroyed by greed !
@Ubique29275 жыл бұрын
Every school child in Leicestershire was taken to her house and taught this story. I don't know if they still are.
@ajplathwisconsin6 жыл бұрын
I think that the British can be grateful that religious strife had all but ended by the 19th century. While the monarchy is still Anglican, Catholics, Lutherans, and other groups are free to worship as they see fit.
@AlishaArlene6 жыл бұрын
It sounds to me like king Edward was poisoned. His illness was sudden and very severe. I'm guessing the duke poisoned him because he thought he would make HIS son king... Even though he knew someone else would acquire the throne after king Edward, I believe he intended to keep poisoning the king (or queen) until the role of king landed on his son. I could be wrong, but its just a thought I had. **shrugs**
@adbreon5 жыл бұрын
Edward died of either tuberculosis or pneumonia. He had the measles the previous year and it is believed to have weakened his immune system enough that some kind of chronic infection began to plague his lungs. His symptoms were pretty well chronicled.
@AlishaArlene5 жыл бұрын
@@adbreon Oh, okay! I was not aware of that. Thanks for the info! :-)
@sararastikhah70395 жыл бұрын
I believe his uncles choice of poison was arsonic. They were trying to keep him weak and under their control while their brother controlled his sister and his fathers widow.
@LynxSouth5 жыл бұрын
@@adbreon His symptoms were not those of either tuberculosis or pneumonia. The best matches to date are poisoning or a particular infection of the lungs.
@jennifermoriarty21885 жыл бұрын
@@LynxSouth it was consumption
@Angie23434 жыл бұрын
The actor they selected to play Edward is so handsome.
@vanessarussell70485 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, Henry the seventh had another son. Arthur. The one who died young, who originally married Catherine of Aragon. Did she forget about him?
@puckdefellow29875 жыл бұрын
He was not a surviving son
@wendijackson88445 жыл бұрын
Arthur didnt die young. He was married to Catherine of Aragon. Henry "inherited" her as wife.
@jennifermoriarty21885 жыл бұрын
@@wendijackson8844 15 is young
@victoriafebres97735 жыл бұрын
THIS!!! I literally was just scrolling through the comments to see if anyone else noticed that Arthur isn't there...unless she's only counting them as "surviving" in which case he did not, but still. It drove me crazy for a bit haha.
@kcielynkcielyn89935 жыл бұрын
She did say surviving children.
@williamberven-ph5ig2 ай бұрын
Poor kid. When the whole scheme of her father's came crashing down, she was quoted as saying, " Can I go home now"?. Heartbreaking. Regardless of of risk of her being used in a possible future uprising, how Mary could order that childs execution is beyond me. Evil fanatic.
@TheVioletGardener2 жыл бұрын
Seems a big issue here was that the council underestimated Jane, Mary and the people of England. So many issues could have been prevented if they hadn’t believed themselves the smartest people in the room
@KP-dd2ci5 жыл бұрын
The most important skill for these period actors...look into the camera and stare for a few seconds, and repeat.
@EvanSol9192 жыл бұрын
There was one potential male heir - Henry Stuart, grandson of Margaret Tudor by her second husband Archibald Douglas. However he was around 7, his parents were Catholic and Henry VIII's will had cut out Margaret's descendants. Ironically it was Henry Stuart's son James who would succeed Elizabeth.
@SNP-19992 жыл бұрын
There was only one consequence for being on the losing side in the Tudor era - a horrible death by execution. If you were lucky, and an aristocrat, it meant beheading. If you were a commoner found guilty of treason, it was to be "hung, drawn and quartered", arguably one of the most horrific death sentences in human history.
@briandeleon86546 жыл бұрын
How can I watch the second part of this?
@SaltyMinorcan6 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4aXanqFedCfqMU
@dragoninthemoon77196 жыл бұрын
I believe this is the second half, seems to be a recap at the beginning. Watch "England's Forgotten Queen: Lady Jane Grey Imprisoned | History Documentary | Reel Truth History" on KZbin kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGbZqGysiLmAeLs
@nizarr215 жыл бұрын
@@dragoninthemoon7719 you're a life saver! Thankyou 😊
@nassauguy485 жыл бұрын
People tend to blame Mary and the Catholics for the death of Jane, but it must be reminded that the Dudleys and the Greys sought to disinherit both Mary AND Elizabeth. The Dudleys and Greys were devout evangelical Protestants who looked upon the Anglicans (of which Elizabeth was one) almost with as much disdain as they did the Catholics. I tend to believe that the evangelical Protestants would have been more harsh than any Catholic or Anglican monarch, as they were hardly the masters of tolerance. And while Mary spared the life of Jane and her father the first time, I can guarantee that a hard core pragmatist like Elizabeth would never have given them a second chance.
@dorderre6 жыл бұрын
These days we're used to kings' names like William, Henry, Stephen, Richard, John, Edward, James, Charles or George - it's pretty interesting to learn there once almost was a king named Guildford ^^ (not meant to spite the Guildfords out there, it's just that to my ears this name doesn't seem to fit to the others)
@wpc14 жыл бұрын
Question:- Could someone explain to me why Edward’s costume bears the Lion Rampant (00:08:42), please? I’m not entirely sure but could that be a mistake?
@anemxia93934 жыл бұрын
“Jane prepears to be the first Queen of England” What about Mathilda-
@EvanSol9193 жыл бұрын
Matilda was never crowned and only ruled over parts of England.
@anemxia93933 жыл бұрын
@@EvanSol919 doesn’t that still count?
@giuliariommi86433 жыл бұрын
@@anemxia9393 no, her plan initially was to be queen regnant herself but after the anarchy she agreed with the king to have her son named king steven's heir instead
@errolpletcher91862 жыл бұрын
Since neither Matilda or Jane were crowned Queens their reigns are disputed. Mary I would be England's first undisputed anointed Queen.
@kriegerkaiser2 жыл бұрын
Helen is one of my favorite historians.
@alktgbgb92724 жыл бұрын
out of topic but Edward's handwriting is so cool it looks like it was printed bruh HAHAHAHAH
@cornelia97784 ай бұрын
Fascinating. Thank you.
@CoxJoxSox6 жыл бұрын
Mary was not illegitimate - she was the daughter of the Queen of 24 years!
@usagi322116 жыл бұрын
True, but she was made legally illegitimate after Henry had his marriage to Catherine annulled.
@muffin63696 жыл бұрын
They meant she was deemed illegitimate by her horrible father Henry VIII for craps sake. You know exactly what they meant. Cut out the indignation.
@ladyv56556 жыл бұрын
Mary and Elizabeth were restored to the line of succession, but their father never acknowledged that he had made any mistakes with regards to how he treated either of their mothers, though it would make sense that one of his daughters would have had to be illegitimate. Most people, especially Catholics, considered Elizabeth as a bastard, since they did not recognize her mother's marriage to the king as his first wife was still alive at the time.
@muffin63696 жыл бұрын
@@ladyv5655 Correct! I've been reading and researching British history for over 25 years and it is without doubt the most fascinating! And I'm an American. You cannot make this stuff up.
@KellieDoll286 жыл бұрын
Nick Doe Neither Mary nor Elizabeth were illegitimate. But Henry said they were, so that’s what it says. Queen Mary had herself declared legitimate.
@sazfretz19454 жыл бұрын
Edward VI wasn't the only son of Henry VIII! He had an illegitimate son, Henry Fitzroy, who also died as a teen.
@allisonmarlow1842 жыл бұрын
Seems Henry VIII has a serious problem with his male bloodline. I wonder what the truth is about the cause of these young deaths, especially Edward's.
@juicedoutthewazoo79212 жыл бұрын
@@allisonmarlow184 probably nothing honestly, probably just caught tuberculosis and died or something like that. cause they didnt have modern mediccie
@kenna1633 жыл бұрын
I'm sure Jane Seymour was cursing Henry out in the afterlife for letting her son be raised as a Protestant. Haha
@Victor_Grimaldi954 жыл бұрын
The actor playing Guilford Dudley is such a CUTIE.
@buk3904 жыл бұрын
Those of you arguing that Mary, Elizabeth or Jane were the true queens... all of it depends on what version of history you choose to believe. It all depends on who is telling the stories
@Marylouise_16 жыл бұрын
The music and scary approaching faces makes this look like a horror film!
@janethagaman19985 жыл бұрын
Thrown to the wolves, an innocent to smart for her own good and a threat to the conniving men at court. Long may she reign!
@Gertyutz5 жыл бұрын
I recommend the excellent 1986 film of this with a very young Helena Bonham-Carter.
@karynwith-a-y66864 жыл бұрын
That movie had the potential to be excellent. Actors were well chosen, but it was also a bit cringy how they depicted a "romance" between Guildford and Jane when there wasn't one. Guildford was recorded in some records as rather abusive to Jane. Some records also suggest that Jane had been in love, prior to her marriage, with Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford ( the guy who eventually married Katherine, Jane's sister).
@emtothedogz5 жыл бұрын
When I visit England I want to visit Queen Janes grave and where she grew up and lived
@chiasanzes97705 жыл бұрын
There's no Queen Jane Gray's grave. She was buried under church floor like rest of those who got executed and no one knows where her bones are.
@lucysummers2765 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or does King Edwood sound like king Geoffrey from GoT?
@some_metalhead4 жыл бұрын
*Edward *Joffrey. And yes, he kind of does
@mollypinto46662 жыл бұрын
Sad story. 😔 Well presented thank you _/\_
@sparkeymcmurphy3 жыл бұрын
Not sure that whomever is responsible for the script knows what "protagonist" means. As the Duke is certainly the antagonist in this story.
@ts-qt7pw5 жыл бұрын
Anyone else on a British history binge??
@crawfish705105 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂me
@WashingtonDC200325 жыл бұрын
It's horrible what they did to her.
@karenhall46453 жыл бұрын
Henry VIII treated marriage like a hobby all so he could have a son. He had a son who was king but died young, and by that time it seems like there were no men to take the throne. Kind of reeks of irony.