Batman Talks To You About Why He Believes In God

Join the Dark Knight on a deeply personal journey as he explores the reasons behind his belief in God. In this video, Batman opens up about the profound experiences, historical evidence, and philosophical reflections that have shaped his faith. From the tragic loss of his parents to the unwavering support of his trusted ally Alfred, discover how moments of grace and resilience have reinforced his belief in something greater.
📖 Key Topics Covered:
00:00 Introduction - Batman shares his early struggles and the beginning of his faith journey.
00:44 The Foundation of Belief - Examining the reliability of the Bible and the evidence supporting its historicity.
02:07 The Historical Jesus - Exploring the compelling historical evidence for Jesus' life, crucifixion, and resurrection.
03:35 Philosophical Reflections - Delving into philosophical arguments for the existence of God, including the Cosmological, Teleological, and Moral Arguments.
04:41 Personal Experiences - Batman's personal encounters and moments of inexplicable strength that have affirmed his faith.
05:37 The Impact of Faith - How belief in God has guided Batman's actions, relationships, and sense of purpose.
06:30 The Testimony of Others - Inspiring stories of faith from other individuals that have influenced Batman.
07:34 Addressing Doubts and Questions - Tackling common questions and doubts about faith, science, and the problem of evil.
08:46 Conclusion
🌟 Highlights:
Batman's reflections on the moments that sparked his belief in God.
Analyzing the reliability of the Gospel accounts and archaeological evidence.
Historical evidence for Jesus' resurrection and the transformation of his followers.
Philosophical arguments for the existence of God.
Personal stories of faith and resilience in the face of darkness.
👥 Join the Conversation:
Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. What are your views on faith and belief in a higher power? Let's explore this journey together.
🔔 Subscribe:
Don't forget to subscribe for more thought-provoking content from the Dark Knight himself. Hit the bell icon to stay updated with our latest videos.
#batman #faith #beliefingod #darkknight #philosophy #history #personaljourney #inspiration #christianity #god
Credits:
Special thanks to all the creators and sources of the clips used in this video.
Disclaimer:
This video is a creative interpretation and is not affiliated with or endorsed by DC Comics or Warner Bros.
Thank you for watching! Stay vigilant, Gotham. And never lose hope.

[@stevethegent6286]

Fun fact, Batman is canonically Catholic, according to the creators of the character.

[@roshinvarghese6879]

So Daredevil

[@SandwichDoctorZ]

I thought Batman was an atheist and Nightwing was the catholic.

[@dixonb.tweenerlegs4225]

​​​​​​@@SandwichDoctorZBatman being atheist would make no sense. He's literally met gods in his universe, like Darkseid. Who portrayed himself as an evil, alternate version of God from the bible. Which is why he says "Darkseid is" as a counter to God's name in the old testament which is Yahweh/Yah ("I am"). On top of that, Bruce also knows the spectre. If Batman were atheist, it would just mean he's in denial of his own adventures. Nightwing is probably just vaguely Christian. Jason Todd is apparently Catholic. And Nightwing just has a Bible and scripture, but it doesn't go much in detail about his faith beyond that. Tbh, any member of the core JL or batfamily being portrayed as atheist would just be bad writing. Unless the character is just in shock and canonically in denial.

[@Sniper-gx7mq]

Lol then why is he beating people up

[@user-dt2hp9wy5q]

Of course he's catholic, catholics have cornered the market for edgy Christianity.

[@jamesfahey5686]

Glad you came to the faith Batman!

[@StephanASmith]

Praise be to the only true God, the Lord Jesus Christ 🙏🏾 ✝️

[@Fonch117]

Dude... THIS VIDEO IS WHY I USE KZbin. To be able to find GEMS LIKE THIS. Thank you :) I believe in God too.

[@raydnchilson7747]

Aww man I thought it was gonna be the dark knight batman voice. R.I.P.

[@cbandit7715]

This is a great idea because many nonchristians might click on this video as a meme.

[@NightmareRex6]

yea lol. altho the modern owners of the IP of batman milking it dry (66sne6) (disney) dont like God, i mean look at there 6-666 syolbol in name.

[@dorememe8548]

I saw how long it was before I clicked it, and thought it was going to take itself seriously and provide arguments. After watching it, I feel like it really is a meme. And I’m still an atheist.

[@kingdavidsaures8479]

Amen, god bless you.

[@KristenPaluch]

i'm glad you believed in god batman i accepted jesus as my savior and was baptized a year ago

[@89playstation65]

Couldn't have put it better.

[@waynebrown6525]

This was one of the best videos I've seen and I'm so glad I watched it praise God

[@sordidknifeparty]

The seeming fine tuning of the universe implies that the various constants which describe the nature of our universe could have been anything other than what they are. There is simply no evidence that any of these values could be different. It is sort of like saying that if the value of pi were off by even one billionth, you wouldn't get true circles. Which is true, but silly, because Pi is defined by circles. Pi exists precisely because the geometry of the universe, and the geometry of circles, dictate what it will be, and it therefore cannot be anything other than what it is. It's very likely that the constants of our universe are like this, what they are because of the geometry of the universe and unchangeable . And if you don't like that one, and you just can't accept that the constants might not be variable, there's another theory in quantum physics called the many worlds Theory which is extremely popular among the leading physicists on the planet, which suggests that the Universe splits itself over and over again every time a Quantum decision is made, and therefore an infinite, or nearly infinite number of branching universes exist. There would therefore be countless other universes which did not have the correct constants and simply failed, and countless other universes like ours in which the constants were correct for life to develop. And obviously we should not be surprised that we find ourselves in one of these universes, as if we tried to exist in one of the other universes we wouldn't exist

[@DarkKnightArchive]

The argument about the fine-tuning of the universe often leads to profound questions about our existence and the nature of reality. Let's break it down. First, you mentioned that there's no evidence the constants of the universe could be different, comparing it to the value of Pi. Pi is indeed a mathematical constant defined by the geometry of circles, and it can't be anything other than what it is. However, the fine-tuning argument isn't about redefining mathematical constants; it's about the specific values of the physical constants that govern our universe-like the gravitational constant, the cosmological constant, and the charge of the electron. These constants determine the structure and behavior of our universe. If they were even slightly different, the universe might not be capable of supporting life as we know it. It's not that these constants are unchangeable like Pi, but that their specific values appear finely tuned to allow for the existence of life. Now, let's address the Many-Worlds Theory. This interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that all possible outcomes of quantum decisions actually occur, creating an infinite number of parallel universes. In some of these universes, the physical constants would not support life. In others, like ours, they do. The theory posits that we find ourselves in a universe with the right conditions for life simply because we couldn't exist in any other kind. While the Many-Worlds Theory is fascinating and widely discussed among physicists, it remains one of several interpretations of quantum mechanics. It provides a naturalistic explanation for the fine-tuning, suggesting that our universe is just one of many where the right conditions happened to occur by chance. However, this doesn't necessarily negate the possibility of a designer. The fine-tuning argument suggests that the precise calibration of these constants points to an intelligent cause. Even if countless other universes exist, the fact that our universe allows for life can still be seen as evidence of design. The improbability of these constants aligning perfectly might suggest that a guiding hand was involved. Ultimately, the debate between fine-tuning and the Many-Worlds Theory reflects the ongoing exploration of our universe's mysteries. Whether through faith, science, or a combination of both, our quest for understanding continues. For me, belief in a higher power doesn't detract from the marvels of science but rather enhances the wonder of our existence. Thank you for engaging in this discussion. Remember, it's through these conversations that we deepen our understanding of the universe and our place within it. Stay curious and never stop seeking the truth.

[@stevensjean4091]

Amen. U got my subscription

[@carterko19_59]

Can this Batman be cannon to the DCEU. I would so watch this movie.

[@CharlesDavila-mh4lr]

This is amazing

[@darkeen42]

You should actually learn about the Gospels and how they were compiled. There's only the consistency that there is is because Church fathers chosen there's only the consistency that there is is because Church fathers Picton choose the writings that were consistent. The gospels are written exactly like myth. I mean The Iliad and the Odyssey are real archaeological locations does that make all the gods in fairy tales and those stories real? Countless stories that we all except are not real and myth past these qualifications just as well and are not better than your Bible does

[@CharlesDavila-mh4lr]

@@darkeen42 i do know the Gospels and i do believe in jesus christ our lord and savior as well as in God. There are countless proff that corroborate the existance of jesus. ive already gone through all my scientfic method process in order to decide i do believe in christianity, trust me. This is the correct religion

[@darkeen42]

@@CharlesDavila-mh4lr no there aren't Christians say the word proof a lot but never give any.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

@@darkeen42 Firstly, you bring up an important point about the compilation of the Gospels. Yes, the Gospels were selected and compiled by early Church fathers, and their choices were influenced by a desire for theological consistency and coherence. However, this doesn't necessarily undermine their value or truthfulness. The early Christians who compiled these texts were also drawing on a rich tradition of eyewitness accounts and oral history, aiming to preserve the teachings and life of Jesus as accurately as possible. You compare the Gospels to mythological works like The Iliad and The Odyssey, pointing out that these also reference real locations. It's true that the existence of real places in a narrative doesn't prove the reality of the events described. However, the Gospels are not just mythological stories; they are rooted in historical context and include detailed accounts of a specific individual, Jesus of Nazareth, whose life and teachings have had a profound and lasting impact on history and culture. Moreover, the Gospels contain elements that distinguish them from pure myth. They include numerous specific details, names of individuals, and places that can be historically and archaeologically verified. The Gospel writers aimed to convey real events and teachings, often at great personal risk, which suggests a genuine belief in the truth of their accounts. It's also worth noting the transformative impact of the teachings of Jesus. The early Christians spread these teachings throughout the Roman Empire, often facing persecution and death. Their unwavering commitment to these beliefs suggests they were convinced of the truth of what they had witnessed. Regarding your comparison with other mythological stories, it's important to differentiate between the genre of myth and the historical narrative with theological significance. While myths serve to explain natural phenomena and cultural values through allegory and symbolism, the Gospels present a coherent and consistent message about the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, which has been central to the Christian faith for over two thousand years.

[@darkeen42]

@@DarkKnightArchive now there is no difference between myth and historical narrative. Other than mostly time. The people that were reciting The Iliad and the Odyssey were pretty confident those things happened for the most part. I mean it's part of the foundation of Rome for crying out loud they thought that was real. Romans think one of the stories about how they were created was the Greeks fled from the war and founded Rome. But no you can't have eyewitness oral tradition. In no way are the gospels eyewitnesses they don't even claim to be they were attributed authors decades to centuries later. They are written in the language none of the apostles would have spoken. Once it's not actually first person it's hearsay. And hearsay when the storyteller is very incentivized to embellish the story. Jesus is real in the same way Santa Claus is. Yes there was a Saint Nicholas yes he was a historical person rooted in reality but everything you think of when you think of Saint Nicholas is not real.

[@PMROZEKfilms]

I think this would be an incredible comic series. Batman developing a series of tests that lead him to realizing that he’s in a comic book. Breaking the fourth wall and realizing the higher power of the writers are real beyond his universe. Tangible and in control of his narrative, rather than the religious narratives of this world

[@X.F.P.]

Dang. Not bad.

[@Veins1]

I'm disappointed that Batman can't deduce that the Bible is mostly fiction. But I take comfort in 3 things. That this is not Batman but someone who projects his beliefs through Batman. That even if this was Batman.. well he met 'actual' gods, so that's fine in his reality. I personally prefer Batman when he was in more grounded stories, but I'm fine with a fictional character believing in another fictional character, as long as this has some meaning in a story. And that I'm okay with smart characters like Batman being wrong from time to time, or having flaws. Now, this is a nice presentation, and I generally like your videos. Great work with the voice and content. But if God exists or not, is a debate that can never be resolved in a crystal clear manner. It all boils down to faith. I think that this 'Batman' thinks more like Daredevil than the Batman that I believe in. Here's my comments about this video: 0:55 You talk about consistency only in NT. Still that doesn't prove anything. Even Harry Potter is consistent and that's fiction. 1:30 Real locations are not proof. Spiderman 'lives' in NY but that's fiction. 2:30 How come these historians never talked about miracles and resurrections? 3:20 It is like you cherry-pick which scientists you prefer to believe. That's confirmation bias. 4:25 This starts well, but the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments are nothing but weak opinions. Just by displaying "accidental chance" shows that you have looked this from the perspective that suits you. 4:40 Personal experiences do not count. It may as well be a delusion. 5:37 Even if all that's bullshit, I'm glad that the message is positive. But the Bible and Faith can easily be distorted into justifying killing and torturing. So, please don't kill someone who works on Saturday! 7:35 Nice chapter. I like it when people try to look other perspectives. The spiritual world is something Batman could believe in, since in his universe he has seen zombies and resurrections (Ra's al Ghul for example). 9:12 What is that greatest purpose?

[@reubenax]

Harry Potter has 1 author. The new testament has several writers corroborating the same event The locations being mentioned is not proof, but it does show that the writers were familiar with the area, adding credibility to the notion that they were eyewitnesses Personal experiences do count in this context. It's this version of Batman explaining why *he* believes in God

[@DarkKnightArchive]

I appreciate your thoughts and your passion for grounded, well-reasoned discussions. While our perspectives may differ, it’s important to explore these topics with respect and depth. Faith and Evidence: You're right that the existence of God ultimately involves faith, but faith is not opposed to reason. Historical and philosophical arguments can provide a rational basis for belief in God. The New Testament, for instance, offers historical consistency and early eyewitness accounts, which many historians find compelling when investigating the resurrection of Jesus. Historical References and Fiction: Consistency and real locations in the Bible don’t conclusively prove its divine inspiration, but they do lend credibility to its historical claims. Unlike fictional works, the Bible’s historical details have been corroborated by archaeological findings and extra-biblical sources. This doesn’t automatically validate every miracle, but it suggests the Bible is more than mere fiction. Historians and Miracles: Ancient historians like Josephus and Tacitus mention Jesus and his crucifixion. While they may not detail miracles, their references to Jesus lend weight to his historical existence. The Gospels, written by those close to Jesus, focus on his miracles and resurrection, which were central to their message. Philosophical Arguments: The Cosmological, Teleological, and Moral arguments are not mere opinions but long-standing philosophical discussions. While some may find them unconvincing, they provide a framework for understanding the existence of a creator. The fine-tuning of the universe, for example, suggests an intelligent designer rather than random chance. Personal Experiences: While personal experiences are subjective, they can be powerful indicators of reality. Many people, including myself, have had encounters that point towards a divine presence. These experiences, coupled with historical and philosophical evidence, form a cumulative case for belief in God. Faith and Morality: The misuse of faith to justify violence is a serious issue, but true Christianity, based on Jesus' teachings, promotes love, forgiveness, and peace. The New Testament condemns violence and emphasizes loving one’s neighbor and even one’s enemies. Spiritual Realities: In my universe, I’ve encountered extraordinary phenomena that challenge a purely materialistic view of reality. While fictional, these experiences mirror the spiritual truths that many believers attest to in the real world. Greatest Purpose: The greatest purpose, from a Christian perspective, is to know and love God, and to love others. This purpose provides a foundation for meaning, moral values, and hope that transcends our immediate circumstances. In conclusion, while faith in God involves personal belief, it is supported by a rich tapestry of historical evidence, philosophical reasoning, and personal experience. As Batman, I seek truth and justice, and these lead me to believe in something greater than myself. (I also have more answers to your questions in the comments that I have responded to. Also feel free to ask more)

[@Veins1]

@@DarkKnightArchive Having respectful debates is nice. You have a nice project here and I do follow you. I like your content. Regardless if there is a God or not, all we need is to be good to each other in this life. I appreciate it when religions are used for good. But there is also a dark side that we need to be aware of. Empty promises, false hope, holy texts used to rationalize bad behaviours and liars who take advantage of people in a weak state. My religious Batman would fight against all that.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

​@@Veins1 I appreciate your support for my content. The importance of being good to each other in this life is undeniable, and many religious teachings, including Christianity, emphasize this principle. The Essence of True Faith: True Christianity calls for love, compassion, and justice. Jesus' teachings focus on loving one's neighbor, caring for the marginalized, and promoting peace. When religion is practiced in its genuine form, it becomes a force for immense good in the world. Addressing the Dark Side: You're right; there are those who misuse religion for personal gain or to justify harmful actions. As Batman, I would stand against such abuses. The Bible warns against false prophets and those who exploit faith for selfish purposes. It's crucial to discern genuine faith from manipulation. Hope and Promises: While some may see religious promises as empty, many find profound hope and purpose in their faith. This hope can inspire positive change, resilience in adversity, and a sense of community. It’s important to distinguish between false hope peddled by charlatans and the genuine hope that sustains millions. Rationalizing Bad Behavior: Misusing holy texts to justify bad behavior is a perversion of faith. True Christianity does not condone violence, discrimination, or exploitation. The teachings of Jesus are clear in their call for humility, service, and sacrificial love. As Batman, I would confront and challenge any misuse of religion that harms others. Living Out Faith: The challenge for believers is to live out their faith authentically, demonstrating the love and justice that their faith demands. When practiced sincerely, Christianity motivates people to work towards social justice, support the needy, and build a more compassionate society. Fighting Injustice: A religious Batman would indeed fight against those who use faith to manipulate and harm. He would defend the vulnerable, expose corruption, and promote truth and integrity. The fight against injustice is a core part of both Batman’s mission and Christian teaching. In conclusion, while there are challenges and abuses within religious practice, the core teachings of Christianity align with the values of justice, love, and compassion. It’s essential to uphold these values and challenge any misuses of faith. As Batman, I stand for truth and justice, values that resonate deeply with the true essence of Christianity.

[@Veins1]

@@DarkKnightArchive I agree with all that. I do think however that Batman most of all believes in himself. He built his entire persona and life on his own. When in despair, I have never seen him pray or turn to God. He never expects a miracle to save him. He prevails on his own. Most weak people get on their knees and pray. Batman takes action to clean up Gotham. Also, Batman is control freak and has trust issues. He needs to be in control of everything... from Robins, to Gotham, to Superman! Perhaps if he knew for sure that there was a God (or any supernatural being) he would try to device a contingency plan to subdue them! I like how you use words to express yourself and this was a nice discussion! Thanks Batman!

[@sordidknifeparty]

Your personal feelings of warmth, or love, or strength, or expansiveness, or whatever you happen to be feeling that you're attributing to God, may be evidence to you, but by its nature it can't be evidence to anyone else. And if you have ever used psychedelic drugs, you will be aware that many of these same feelings, if not all of them, can definitely be achieved without any Divine assistance. Your brain is able to create those brain States that make you have those feelings

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Gospel Accounts and Historical Reliability: The Gospels, while indeed biblical texts, are also valuable historical documents. They provide multiple attestations to Jesus' burial in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea. This is significant because it is independently reported in all four Gospels (Matthew 27:57-60, Mark 15:42-46, Luke 23:50-53, John 19:38-42). The criterion of multiple attestation increases the reliability of this claim. Early Creeds and Paul's Letters: Early Christian creeds, such as the one found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7, which dates to within a few years of Jesus' crucifixion, also mention Jesus' burial. Paul's letters are considered by many historians, including skeptical ones, to be genuine and early sources of information about Jesus. Roman Practices and Exceptions: While it is true that Romans commonly left crucifixion victims to rot or disposed of them in mass graves, there were exceptions. Roman authorities sometimes allowed for the burial of crucified individuals, especially in the case of those with influential friends or family. Joseph of Arimathea, described as a member of the Sanhedrin and a wealthy man, could have had the necessary influence to request and receive Jesus' body for burial. Archaeological Evidence: Archaeological discoveries have shown that tombs consistent with the description in the Gospels existed during this period. The discovery of the "James Ossuary" and the tomb of Caiaphas, the high priest who played a role in Jesus' trial, demonstrate that rock-cut tombs were used in Jerusalem at the time. Jewish Burial Customs: Jewish customs also play a role in understanding the burial of Jesus. Jewish law emphasized the importance of burying the dead, and leaving a body on a cross overnight was considered a violation of Jewish law (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). This cultural context supports the Gospel accounts of Jesus being taken down and buried before the Sabbath. Historical Consensus: Many historians, regardless of their religious beliefs, accept that Jesus was buried in a tomb. For instance, John Dominic Crossan, a highly skeptical scholar, acknowledges that Jesus' burial by Joseph of Arimathea is historically probable. Similarly, Bart Ehrman, another skeptical scholar, recognizes the burial as one of the more certain facts about Jesus' life.

[@blackpillmenace]

BATMAN, religion itself is idolatry: love principles *NOT* people. With that said, If Jesus was the son of god, should the alien Races of Oa, Thanagar and Korugar worship him?🤔

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Let's first address the notion of idolatry. True religion, at its core, is not about idolizing people but about embracing principles and values that transcend individual human beings. Christianity, when understood correctly, emphasizes the love of God and the adherence to principles such as love, justice, and mercy, which are personified in the figure of Jesus Christ. Jesus represents the ultimate embodiment of these divine principles. Regarding the question of whether alien races like those from Oa, Thanagar, and Korugar should worship Jesus if He is the Son of God, it's essential to recognize that the message of Jesus transcends human boundaries and cultures. If we accept the premise that Jesus is the Son of God, His teachings and sacrifice have universal implications. The principles He espoused-love, compassion, self-sacrifice-are not limited to Earth or to humans but apply to all sentient beings capable of understanding and embracing these values. However, worship in Christianity is not about forced allegiance but about a personal relationship with God through Jesus. The decision to worship or follow these principles would be a matter of personal conviction for any being, regardless of their origin. The essence of Christianity is the transformative power of love and redemption, which has the potential to reach and resonate with any soul, human or otherwise. Whether on Earth or in the far reaches of the universe, the principles of love, justice, and selflessness can guide any being toward a higher purpose and a deeper understanding of their existence. Ultimately, the core message is to love and uphold principles that elevate us beyond our limitations, much like the philosophy that guides me in my fight for justice in Gotham. Whether we’re talking about humans or aliens, the principles that Jesus taught can serve as a beacon for all.

[@booktheory3098]

Amen! Jesus Is Lord!

[@sordidknifeparty]

As to the cosmological argument, we do not know that everything that exists has a Cause. The universe exists and we don't know that it has a Cause, to Simply claim that it does in your opening premise is begging the question . Secondly, we have never experienced true nothing. We have never in reality found a space that didn't have stuff in it, which wasn't permeated with fields. We have absolutely no idea of what the properties of true nothing would be. It could be that it's highly unstable, and prone to creating matter and energy. We just don't know Furthermore, quantum mechanics is discovering that at small enough levels it does seem that things are created and destroyed constantly with seemingly no cause. We have never seen anything above that Quantum level begin to exist in any meaningful way. Everything that we encounter is just reorganizations of matter and energy which already exists. A chair doesn't begin to exist, many molecules simply start to become a chair and eventually it's chair enough like that we say it's a chair, but there was no point where there wasn't a chair and then a chair began to exist . Quantum mechanics further muddies the question with experiments that seem to indicate that causality can work backward in time. Several experiments have been done which seem to confirm the fact that an event which has occurred in the past can be affected by an event which will occur in the future. Bizarre, I know, but look into it and you'll see I'm not making this up . It's called the delayed Choice experiment Finally, if it were in fact true that everything that exists requires a cause, and God exists, then definitionally God requires a cause. To Simply state that God doesn't require a cause is special pleading. I could just as easily say the singularity from which the universe came into existence requires no cause, but you wouldn't accept that. So neither will i.

[@ArthurOdongo]

He didn’t say “everything that exist”. He said @everything that begins to exist”. There is a difference

[@DarkKnightArchive]

The Cosmological Argument and Causality: It's true that we cannot empirically prove that everything has a cause, especially when it comes to the universe. However, the principle of sufficient reason, which states that everything must have a reason or cause, is a foundational concept in both philosophy and science. It’s not merely begging the question; it’s an attempt to understand the underlying reasons for existence. The universe’s existence without a cause would challenge our understanding of causality itself. The Nature of Nothing: You correctly point out that we haven't experienced "true nothingness." The concept of nothingness being unstable and potentially giving rise to matter and energy is intriguing and aligns with some interpretations of quantum mechanics. However, this does not necessarily negate the cosmological argument but rather adds depth to our understanding of how something could arise from nothing. This notion of instability in nothingness still leaves open the question of why there is something rather than nothing, which theists argue is best explained by a necessary being-God. Quantum Mechanics and Causality: Quantum mechanics does show that at subatomic levels, particles can appear and disappear in seemingly random ways. Yet, this quantum behavior does not straightforwardly scale to the macroscopic world we inhabit. The fact that quantum events appear uncaused does not invalidate the broader philosophical arguments for a cause of the universe itself. The delayed choice experiment and other quantum phenomena suggest that our understanding of time and causality is incomplete, but they do not wholly undermine the idea of a prime cause. Reorganization of Matter and Energy: It’s accurate that what we see in the universe is often a reorganization of existing matter and energy. However, the cosmological argument isn’t just about things beginning to exist in their current form, but about the existence of the universe itself. The question remains: Why does anything exist at all, rather than nothing? Special Pleading and God’s Existence: The assertion that God does not require a cause is not special pleading but rather a fundamental aspect of classical theism. God is posited as a necessary being-one that exists by the necessity of its own nature and does not depend on anything else for its existence. This is different from contingent beings, which do require causes. The singularity from which the universe emerged, if proposed as uncaused, would need to be a necessary being itself, but it lacks the explanatory power attributed to a transcendent creator. In conclusion, while modern physics and cosmology provide fascinating insights into the nature of existence and causality, they do not definitively rule out the cosmological argument for God's existence. The philosophical reasoning behind the argument complements scientific inquiry, offering a holistic view that seeks to understand why there is something rather than nothing, and why the universe operates with the order and regularity that it does. Finally, god bless you

[@NightmareRex6]

mandella effect explained? seems to be two "timelines" otherwise why do peaople from 1960s remember SAME mandella effects that "changed" in 1970/80 as those born in 2000s that remember it changing in 2014?

[@sordidknifeparty]

Moral values are a thing which is evolved in all social creatures. It is subjective and contextual. You cannot prove the existence of anything like objective morality. Even if you could prove that God existed, and that God was good, and that God was the creator of the universe, it still would not logically follow that we objectively should worship or obey God. Is it objectively true external from God that we ought to worship God? If so then objective morality, can be attained without God. Is it true that we should worship God because God says we should worship god? Well then that's just circular, and you're right where you started. I can prove that morals exist, and not just in humans but countless other species. Can you prove that objective morals exist?

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Evolved Morality vs. Objective Morality: You assert that moral values are evolved traits in social creatures, making them subjective and contextual. While it’s true that social behaviors can evolve, this doesn’t necessarily account for the sense of objective moral values many people experience. Evolutionary theory might explain why we have certain behaviors, but it struggles to account for the moral ought - the belief that some actions are inherently right or wrong regardless of human opinion. For instance, concepts like justice and human rights often transcend cultural and evolutionary explanations. The persistence and universality of certain moral principles suggest there’s more at play than just social conditioning (Romans 2:14-15). The Basis of Objective Morality: The idea of objective morality posits that certain moral truths exist independently of human beliefs or feelings. From a Christian perspective, these truths are grounded in the character of God. God’s nature is the ultimate standard of goodness, and moral values flow from this nature. This provides a solid foundation for why certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong. Without an objective moral standard, morality becomes relative, and actions like murder or oppression could be justified under different social or cultural norms, which is a dangerous and unstable foundation for ethical behavior (Psalm 119:160). The Argument from Moral Realism: Moral realism argues that there are moral facts in the same way there are physical facts. Philosophers like William Lane Craig have used the Moral Argument to support the existence of God: -If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. -Objective moral values and duties do exist. -Therefore, God exists. -This argument hinges on the premise that we experience certain moral values and duties as objectively true, and the best explanation for this is the existence of a moral lawgiver - God (Romans 1:20). Worship and Obedience: The question of why we should worship or obey God, even if He exists, can be tackled from multiple angles. If God is the creator and sustainer of the universe, and if He embodies perfect goodness, it follows that worship and obedience are appropriate responses to His nature and His acts. It’s not just about a command to worship, but an acknowledgment of our place in the universe and a recognition of God’s inherent worthiness of worship. Worshiping God is an act of aligning oneself with the ultimate source of goodness and truth, which provides a basis for moral behavior and purpose in life (Psalm 100:3). Circular Reasoning: You mention the concern of circular reasoning - that we should worship God because God says so. In Christianity, the call to worship God is not based solely on a command but on revelation and relationship. The transformative experiences of believers, historical evidence of Jesus’ life and resurrection, and the consistency of God’s character revealed in the Bible provide a multifaceted foundation for worship. It’s not a blind adherence but a reasoned and relational response to a God who is revealed as loving, just, and worthy of devotion (Philippians 2:10-11). Evidence for Objective Morals: Providing empirical evidence for objective morals is challenging because moral values are not physical entities. However, the near-universal recognition of certain moral principles across cultures and history points to their objective nature. Actions like murder, theft, and lying are almost universally condemned, suggesting a common moral framework that transcends human invention. This universality aligns with the Christian belief in a moral lawgiver who imprints His moral law on human hearts (Romans 2:15).

[@NightmareRex6]

i love jesus altho i dont like the archane 99/100 to hell system vs the non archane 1/3 to hell system (free will, ALL knowlage VS free-will and MASS deception)

[@DarkKnightArchive]

I understand your concerns about the concept of hell and the different interpretations of salvation. It's a complex topic, and one that has been debated by theologians and scholars for centuries. However, let's consider a few points that might help clarify this issue. First, the essence of Jesus' teachings is love, compassion, and redemption. The central message of Christianity is that through Jesus, we have a path to salvation. It's not about arbitrary rules or a punitive system, but about a relationship with God, based on faith and love. The idea of free will is crucial here. God has given us the freedom to choose our path. This freedom means that we are responsible for our actions and their consequences. The notion of hell can be seen as the natural outcome of a life lived in deliberate separation from God, rather than a punishment imposed without reason. Moreover, the knowledge and understanding of divine justice are beyond our human comprehension. What may seem harsh or unfair to us might be viewed differently from a divine perspective, where ultimate justice and mercy are perfectly balanced. Regarding the concept of deception, it's important to differentiate between genuine faith and the misuse of religion by individuals who might twist its teachings for their own ends. True faith is not about being deceived, but about seeking truth and living according to principles of love, justice, and humility. Remember, Jesus' message was about offering hope, forgiveness, and a way to reconnect with God. It's about understanding that, despite our flaws and failures, we are loved and given the chance to turn our lives around. In defending the existence of God and Christianity, it's vital to focus on the core of Jesus' message - love, forgiveness, and redemption - rather than getting lost in the complexities of doctrinal differences. Faith is a journey, and each person's path to understanding and accepting God's love is unique.

[@awall1298]

Christ is King

[@sordidknifeparty]

Suggesting that a higher power is helping you in times when you are in need is totally uncompassionate to the countless individuals throughout history who have suffered and died horribly without anyone intervening, Divine or otherwise. What makes you so special that God reaches his hand down and helps you find your car keys, but let's that toddler remain locked in a Psychopaths basement being tortured? If your God does in fact sometimes choose to help people his choices are absolutely appalling.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Free Will and Human Responsibility: One of the central tenets of Christian theology is the concept of free will. God has given humans the freedom to choose their actions. This freedom allows for genuine love and moral growth, but it also opens the door to the possibility of evil actions. The atrocities committed by individuals are a tragic misuse of this gift of free will. Blaming God for human evil overlooks the responsibility we have for our choices and actions (Deuteronomy 30:19). The Nature of Divine Intervention: The idea that God selectively intervenes in our lives does not imply that He acts whimsically or with favoritism. The Christian understanding of God’s intervention is often subtle and not always in the form of miraculous rescues. God’s help can come in many forms, such as inner strength, courage, and wisdom to face difficult situations. The apparent randomness of divine intervention can be difficult to comprehend, but it's not necessarily a reflection of God’s character but rather of our limited understanding (Isaiah 55:8-9). The Mystery of Suffering: Christianity does not shy away from the reality of suffering. The Bible is filled with accounts of individuals who suffered greatly, yet maintained their faith. Job, for instance, experienced profound suffering and loss, yet he held onto his faith in God’s ultimate goodness. The presence of suffering in the world is a complex issue that intersects with human free will, the consequences of living in a fallen world, and the mysterious ways in which God’s purposes are worked out through human history (Romans 8:28). Jesus and the Cross: The central event of Christianity is the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, which shows that God is not distant from human suffering. Jesus’ suffering on the cross is seen as God’s ultimate act of empathy and solidarity with humanity. Through Jesus’ death and resurrection, Christians believe that God has provided a way to redeem suffering and offer hope beyond this life (Hebrews 4:15-16). The Role of the Church and Believers: Christians are called to be God’s hands and feet in the world, to bring relief and compassion to those who are suffering. While we may not understand why certain tragedies occur, we are called to respond with love and action. The church has a long history of providing care for the suffering, feeding the hungry, and advocating for justice. These acts of compassion are ways in which God works through believers to address suffering in the world (Matthew 25:35-40). The Hope of Redemption: Christianity offers a vision of ultimate justice and redemption. The belief in a final resurrection and a new creation where there will be no more suffering or death provides hope that the injustices and pains of this world are not the final word. This eschatological hope is a central aspect of Christian faith and provides a framework for understanding present suffering in the light of future restoration (Revelation 21:4). In conclusion, while the presence of suffering and evil in the world is a profound challenge, the Christian faith provides a robust framework for addressing these issues. It acknowledges human free will, the mystery of divine action, and the hope of ultimate redemption. My faith in God helps me to navigate the darkness, find strength in adversity, and work towards a world where justice and compassion prevail.

[@DeconvertedMan]

Batman is as real as Jesus. :D

[@MAC_Productions]

Empirically prove that pls

[@DeconvertedMan]

@@MAC_Productions Clearly its true since Batman was talking about god.

[@MAC_Productions]

@@DeconvertedMan bruh

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Comparing the reality of Batman to that of Jesus is an intriguing thought, but it's important to distinguish between fictional characters and historical figures. I, Batman, am a creation of the comic book world. My existence is rooted in stories, crafted by writers and artists to entertain, inspire, and explore complex themes. I'm a symbol, an idea, created to fight against the darkness within Gotham City. But at the end of the day, I'm fictional. Jesus, on the other hand, is a historical figure. There's substantial historical evidence that Jesus of Nazareth lived around 2,000 years ago. Multiple sources, both religious and secular, document his life and impact. The Gospels, written within decades of his life, provide detailed accounts of his teachings, crucifixion, and the claims of his resurrection. These documents have been scrutinized and studied by historians and scholars for centuries. The comparison also touches on a deeper level of belief and faith. Believing in Jesus isn't just about acknowledging his historical existence; it's about recognizing his teachings and the profound impact he has had on billions of lives throughout history. Christianity has shaped cultures, ethics, and civilizations in ways that are undeniable, whether one is a believer or not. While Batman is a figure of fiction designed to inspire hope and justice, Jesus is a figure whose life and message have inspired faith, transformation, and a moral framework for countless people over millennia. In Gotham, I fight against physical crime and corruption, striving to bring justice and hope to a city in need. But the message of Jesus addresses the human condition on a deeper, spiritual level. His teachings on love, forgiveness, and redemption provide a pathway to inner transformation and eternal hope. In essence, while Batman and Jesus may share the ability to inspire, their realities are fundamentally different. One is the creation of human imagination, and the other is a cornerstone of human history and faith. Thank you for the thought-provoking comparison. Remember, in our search for truth, it's crucial to discern the lines between fiction and reality, symbol and substance.

[@DeconvertedMan]

@@MAC_Productions checkmate.

[@jordanbateman-uw1zg]

Hilarious!

[@djcrobo2877]

This was pretty kool! Hearing "Batman" talk about this. Btw, I can't name names off the top of my head, there are many people, highly intelligent and very determined, most were atheists, who tried to prove God didn't exist and in turn found the opposite, that He does. Which just strikes me now, how many scientific theories, when put to the test, trying to prove or disprove something and getting the opposite results. Yet, unfortunately many either don't or can't accept the results...I believe this is the human condition. We don't like, at times to believe the truth, objective, undeniable truth. We need to doubt our doubts, be skeptical of our skepticism. Question EVERYTHING! This is kool because Batman is "the world's greatest detective", would be kool to see a comic where he searches for God! Like in EVERY aspect. Following the trail and mystery. God is a personable God. He's so very good! God bless and Godspeed on this wild yet amazing journey called life. Truth really is stranger then fiction, and most can't handle the truth.

[@sordidknifeparty]

Scientists are overwhelmingly atheists. Sciences like evolutionary biology are almost exclusively atheist. if it was the case that reality truly suggested the existence of a god like the one you guys believe in, wouldn't we expect to see people who entered the field as people of Faith to continue to have faith rather than to convert to atheism upon gaining further knowledge of how the universe works? Also, scientists have never tried to prove that God doesn't exist. The god hypothesis is unfalsifiable and therefore cannot be disproven by any sort of scientific experiment or study. All we do know is that time and again Solutions which were offered by religion are overturned by naturalistic explanations, and then the goal posts are shifted by the religious. That some individual scientists reach the point in their studies where they just couldn't figure out how to go forward, shrug their shoulders gave up and said it must have been God, is not evidence that God is real

[@sordidknifeparty]

The only two people who we have historical attestation for, external to the Bible, who claim to have seen the Risen Christ is Simon Peter and Paul. Paul's experience was a vision, and much later, and therefore not what we're talking about. We don't have to explain a group hallucination. Just a single man having a hallucination

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Multiple Witnesses in Early Creeds: The early Christian creeds, such as the one found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, predate the New Testament writings and provide a list of witnesses to the resurrected Christ. These creeds were formulated within a few years of Jesus' death, indicating that belief in the resurrection was not based on a single individual's vision but was a shared conviction among many early Christians. Paul’s Vision and Apostolic Confirmation: While Paul did experience a vision of the risen Christ, he also sought confirmation from the original apostles, including Peter (Cephas) and James, Jesus' brother (Galatians 1:18-19). This demonstrates that Paul's experience was corroborated by those who had known Jesus personally and had seen Him after His resurrection. Additional Historical Sources: Besides the Bible, early Christian writers such as Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, and Polycarp also attest to the resurrection. These early church fathers had connections to the apostles and their immediate successors, providing additional layers of historical testimony. Nature of Hallucinations: Hallucinations are typically individual experiences and do not occur collectively in the same way to different people, especially under varied circumstances. The resurrection accounts involve multiple appearances to different groups, in various settings, over a period of 40 days (Acts 1:3). This is inconsistent with the psychological profile of hallucinations. Transformation of the Disciples: The drastic change in the behavior of Jesus' disciples-from fearful and disillusioned followers to bold proclaimers of the resurrection-is best explained by their genuine belief in having seen the risen Christ. This transformation led them to endure persecution and martyrdom, which is unlikely if they were based on a hallucination or a lie. External Attestations: Though non-Christian sources like Josephus and Tacitus do not directly mention the witnesses by name, they acknowledge the existence and rapid growth of the early Christian movement, which was founded on the belief in the resurrection. Josephus, in particular, references Jesus and his crucifixion, and Tacitus mentions the persecution of Christians, indirectly supporting the historical context in which these events took place. Impact of Resurrection: The resurrection of Jesus had a profound and enduring impact, leading to the rapid spread of Christianity. This movement’s growth in the face of significant opposition and persecution points to a powerful, motivating belief among the early Christians, further supporting the authenticity of their experiences. In conclusion, while external attestations of individual witnesses are limited, the cumulative evidence from early creeds, the transformation of the disciples, the nature of hallucinations, and the writings of early church fathers provide a compelling case for the resurrection of Christ. This event is foundational to Christianity and underscores the belief in a higher power actively involved in human history.

[@sordidknifeparty]

The tomb burial is not well supported. It is only supported by the Gospels . There is no extra biblical support for this claim. Not only that, but the evidence we do have about how crucifixion victims were dealt with by The romans, Who were the people that were crucified Jesus, directly contradict such a story, as they threw nearly all crucifixion victims in common Graves after leaving them to rot on the cross for some time

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Gospel Accounts and Historical Reliability: The Gospels, while indeed biblical texts, are also valuable historical documents. They provide multiple attestations to Jesus' burial in a tomb by Joseph of Arimathea. This is significant because it is independently reported in all four Gospels (Matthew 27:57-60, Mark 15:42-46, Luke 23:50-53, John 19:38-42). The criterion of multiple attestation increases the reliability of this claim. Early Creeds and Paul's Letters: Early Christian creeds, such as the one found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7, which dates to within a few years of Jesus' crucifixion, also mention Jesus' burial. Paul's letters are considered by many historians, including skeptical ones, to be genuine and early sources of information about Jesus. Roman Practices and Exceptions: While it is true that Romans commonly left crucifixion victims to rot or disposed of them in mass graves, there were exceptions. Roman authorities sometimes allowed for the burial of crucified individuals, especially in the case of those with influential friends or family. Joseph of Arimathea, described as a member of the Sanhedrin and a wealthy man, could have had the necessary influence to request and receive Jesus' body for burial. Archaeological Evidence: Archaeological discoveries have shown that tombs consistent with the description in the Gospels existed during this period. The discovery of the "James Ossuary" and the tomb of Caiaphas, the high priest who played a role in Jesus' trial, demonstrate that rock-cut tombs were used in Jerusalem at the time. Jewish Burial Customs: Jewish customs also play a role in understanding the burial of Jesus. Jewish law emphasized the importance of burying the dead, and leaving a body on a cross overnight was considered a violation of Jewish law (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). This cultural context supports the Gospel accounts of Jesus being taken down and buried before the Sabbath. Historical Consensus: Many historians, regardless of their religious beliefs, accept that Jesus was buried in a tomb. For instance, John Dominic Crossan, a highly skeptical scholar, acknowledges that Jesus' burial by Joseph of Arimathea is historically probable. Similarly, Bart Ehrman, another skeptical scholar, recognizes the burial as one of the more certain facts about Jesus' life. In conclusion, while the Gospels are primary sources, they are supported by early creeds, cultural context, archaeological findings, and the scholarly consensus that accepts the burial as historically plausible. These multiple lines of evidence provide a robust case for the historical reliability of Jesus' burial in a tomb.

[@sordidknifeparty]

If you don't believe that group hallucinations can happen, how do you explain thousands of people claiming to simultaneously see the image of mother Mary in the sky? how do you explain the thousands and thousands of people who claim to have seen Miracles done in real life by people of other faiths than yours ? Were all those thousands of people simply lying? Or is it maybe more like when enough people really want to see something they find a way mentally to see it?

[@fakeaccount7913]

Uhm. What? Yikes I'll try to help I guess. Its called history, and all throughout history millions of people have all seen the same things, as well as different things. Most of history is humans seeing things, and not understanding what they see. Heres your problem, kiddo, youre putting all your faith in humans. Why? Why are you doing such a thing? If a million people told me they seen a spaghetti monster in the sky. Good job. Thumbs up and I move on. People have been completely wrong with what they have seen and what it meant all throughout history. Stop hoping that humans can throw a life jacket against God. Youre drowning. And the best you got is the virgin Mary on a tortilla? 20 bucks and I can look at your tortilla? Sad, what sad life to hold so much faith and trust in mankind.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Group Hallucinations: Group hallucinations, where multiple people simultaneously perceive the same unreal phenomenon, are exceedingly rare and lack substantial support in psychological literature. What is often described as a group hallucination typically involves social and psychological influences where individuals in a group environment may convince themselves and others that they are experiencing the same event. This is distinct from the kind of consistent, independent eyewitness accounts found in the resurrection appearances of Jesus. These accounts come from multiple sources, including skeptics like Paul, who was initially a persecutor of Christians, and James, Jesus' brother, who did not believe in Jesus during his lifetime (1 Corinthians 15:3-7). Miracles Across Different Faiths: The claim that miracles occur in various religions is not necessarily an argument against the existence of God or the validity of Christianity. The existence of miracles in other faiths can be seen as evidence of a supernatural reality that transcends human understanding. Within Christianity, miracles serve as signs pointing to the divine truth of Jesus Christ and the power of God. The key difference lies in the nature and purpose of these miracles. Christian miracles, particularly the resurrection of Jesus, are historically grounded events that have transformative implications for humanity (John 20:24-29). Mass Sightings and Psychological Factors: Mass sightings of phenomena like the image of Mother Mary in the sky can often be attributed to a combination of psychological factors, social influences, and environmental conditions. When people are in a heightened state of expectation or religious fervor, their perception can be influenced by cognitive biases, leading them to interpret ambiguous stimuli in line with their beliefs. This does not necessarily mean they are lying but rather that their experiences are shaped by their expectations and cultural context. The Unique Case of the Resurrection: The resurrection of Jesus is a unique event in the history of religious claims. Unlike many reported miracles, it is supported by a robust historical foundation, including the empty tomb, the post-resurrection appearances, and the dramatic transformation of the disciples. These elements are documented in early, multiple sources and have been critically examined by historians. The resurrection is not just a miraculous claim but a pivotal event that has profound implications for the Christian faith (Acts 2:32, 1 Corinthians 15:14-19). Philosophical and Theological Context: From a philosophical perspective, the existence of God provides a coherent explanation for the origin, design, and moral order of the universe. Arguments like the Cosmological Argument (everything that begins to exist has a cause), the Teleological Argument (the fine-tuning of the universe points to a designer), and the Moral Argument (objective moral values require a moral lawgiver) all point to the existence of a transcendent, personal God (Romans 1:20, Psalm 19:1).

[@nowmotivated69]

Never believe god, even if he is real he is written as a fascist traitor who sent jesus to hell and blamed jesus by saying he sent himself, and has no ownership even though god is all knowing and responsible for literally everything. just know that nature and jesus are real. reliance on anything, especially the unknown, is asking to be betrayed. believe in motivation.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

I understand your skepticism and the complex emotions surrounding the concept of God, especially when viewed through the lens of human suffering and the complexities of theological interpretations. Let's address these concerns one by one. First, regarding the portrayal of God and the sacrifice of Jesus, it's crucial to understand the context within Christian theology. Jesus’ death on the cross is seen not as a betrayal by God, but as the ultimate act of love and redemption. According to Christian belief, Jesus willingly took on the sins of humanity to offer salvation to all. This act exemplifies the highest form of self-sacrifice, not a dereliction of divine duty or an act of cosmic betrayal. God, in Christian understanding, is not a tyrant but a being of perfect justice and perfect mercy. The idea is that God gave humans free will, and with that comes the potential for both good and evil. The existence of suffering and injustice in the world is often a result of human choices and actions, not a reflection of God's character. As for reliance on the unknown and the fear of betrayal, it’s true that blind faith without understanding can lead to disillusionment. However, faith in its true form is not about abandoning reason or evidence but about seeking a deeper understanding of existence and our place within it. Motivation and belief are not mutually exclusive; in fact, they can complement each other. Believing in higher principles can provide profound motivation to act justly, love deeply, and strive for the greater good. Nature and the historical figure of Jesus are indeed real, and their teachings about love, compassion, and resilience are tangible. These principles align with the core message of Christianity. When properly understood, they encourage not blind faith, but an active, thoughtful, and principled life. In my own journey, I've found that belief in something greater than oneself can be a powerful motivator. It’s not about dependence, but about finding strength in values and principles that transcend our individual limitations. Whether through faith, reason, or a combination of both, what matters is striving to make the world a better place. In the end, belief in God and adherence to principles of love, justice, and self-sacrifice can coexist with a rational, motivated approach to life. It’s about finding balance and understanding that faith, when properly grounded, can be a source of immense strength and guidance.

[@sordidknifeparty]

The percentage of atheists in prison is almost zero. The percentage of the prison population which is Christian or Muslim is incredibly High. Countries which have high rates of religiosity, have the lowest standards of living, the highest crime rates, the highest poverty, the lowest education rates, the highest rates of violence etcetera, while Nations which are largely atheists rank among the best in the world on nearly every metric. It is pretty clear that having religion cannot be a strong indicator that a person will be good or moral, nor that being an atheist will mean they are immoral, quite the opposite in fact

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Correlation vs. Causation: It's important to distinguish between correlation and causation. The fact that certain countries with high rates of religiosity have lower standards of living and higher crime rates does not necessarily mean that religion is the cause of these issues. Socioeconomic factors, historical contexts, and governance quality play significant roles. Countries with high poverty and crime rates often face complex challenges that cannot be attributed solely to religious belief. Prison Demographics: The demographics of prison populations reflect a variety of factors, including socioeconomic status, education levels, and systemic issues within the justice system. The high percentage of Christians and Muslims in prison might be more reflective of the general population’s demographics rather than the inherent morality of religious individuals. Additionally, many prisoners might identify with a religion for cultural reasons or as a source of hope and rehabilitation during incarceration, rather than as a genuine reflection of their pre-incarceration beliefs. Moral Behavior and Belief: Morality is not exclusive to religious belief, nor is it absent in atheists. People of all belief systems can exhibit moral or immoral behavior. Christianity teaches that humans are inherently flawed and in need of grace and redemption. This means that simply identifying as a Christian does not make one immune to immoral actions. True Christian teaching emphasizes transformation and living according to the values taught by Jesus, such as love, compassion, and justice. Positive Influence of Religion: Despite the criticisms, religion has been a force for good in many areas. Religious organizations often lead charitable efforts, provide social support, and promote ethical behavior. In many societies, religious institutions play a crucial role in fostering community, aiding the poor, and promoting moral values. Societal Benefits of Religion: There are numerous studies showing that individuals who engage in regular religious practices tend to have better mental health, lower rates of substance abuse, and greater social support networks. The sense of community, purpose, and ethical framework provided by religious belief can be beneficial to individuals and society. Atheist Nations and Metrics: While some predominantly atheist nations rank high on various societal metrics, these countries also benefit from strong governance, robust social systems, and high levels of education. These factors contribute significantly to their success and cannot be attributed solely to the absence of religion. Objective Morality and God: The existence of objective moral values provides a strong argument for the existence of God. If moral values are merely subjective and evolved, then they lack a solid foundation. Christianity posits that objective moral values are rooted in the nature of God, giving them an unchanging and universal standard. In conclusion, while the statistics about religiosity and societal well-being might raise questions, they do not provide a comprehensive picture. The relationship between belief, morality, and societal health is complex and influenced by many factors. Christianity offers a robust framework for understanding morality and provides a source of hope, purpose, and community for countless individuals. The existence of God and the teachings of Christianity remain a powerful and compelling foundation for moral values and ethical behavior.

[@dorianphilotheates3769]

This is “evidence”?! From the perspective of a Biblical archaeologist, I can’t even begin to enumerate the gross inaccuracies, blatant fallacies, and outright lies in this one...

[@DarkKnightArchive]

I appreciate your passion for archaeology and your dedication to seeking the truth. As someone who values evidence and logical reasoning, I understand where you're coming from. However, let me address your concerns from a different perspective. Archaeological Evidence There are several instances where archaeology has supported biblical accounts. For example: The City of David: Excavations in Jerusalem have revealed structures that align with descriptions of the City of David in the Bible. The Pool of Siloam: Discovered in 2004, this pool matches the description in John 9:7 where Jesus heals a blind man. The Dead Sea Scrolls: These ancient manuscripts, discovered in the 1940s and 1950s, include texts from the Hebrew Bible that date back to the Second Temple period, confirming the antiquity and preservation of biblical texts. Historical Consistency The Bible, particularly the New Testament, contains numerous references to historical figures and events that are corroborated by external sources: Pontius Pilate: An inscription discovered in Caesarea Maritima confirms his existence and role as the prefect of Judea during the time of Jesus. Herod the Great: His extensive building projects and political influence are well-documented by historians like Josephus. Census of Quirinius: Luke 2:1-3 mentions a census during Quirinius's governorship of Syria, which aligns with historical records of a census around that time. Addressing Inaccuracies While there may be discrepancies and debates about specific details, it’s essential to consider the broader picture. The Bible was written over centuries by different authors with varying perspectives. Despite this, its core messages and many historical references have been remarkably consistent. Eyewitness Accounts The New Testament, particularly the Gospels, is based on eyewitness accounts. While written decades after Jesus' death, these texts reflect the testimonies of those who lived with and followed Jesus. Early church fathers, such as Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, also attest to the authenticity of these accounts. Philosophical and Moral Consistency Beyond archaeology, the Bible's philosophical and moral teachings have had a profound impact on Western civilization. Concepts of justice, mercy, and human dignity found in the Bible have shaped legal systems, social norms, and ethical standards. Faith and Reason Faith isn't just about believing without evidence; it’s about interpreting the evidence in a way that makes sense of the world and our experiences. While archaeology and history provide valuable insights, they are part of a larger tapestry that includes personal experiences, philosophical reflections, and spiritual insights. Conclusion As Batman, I rely on evidence, logic, and reason. While there may be debates and differences in interpretation, it’s crucial to approach the Bible with the same rigor and openness we apply to any historical text. By doing so, we can appreciate its profound impact on humanity and its enduring relevance.

[@thedarkknight727]

I’m a “PANTHEIST” in which is the believe that “GOD,” is the Universe, and everything around us, and WE are like the Blood Cells of God, and our purpose in life is to do just that, LIVE, life however WE, see fit. In simple words, “ALL IS ONE, and ONE IS ALL” to ME that’s GOD. 😇

[@mongoose4j]

That’s not God-that’s an idol. Anything you make in the place of God is an idol. It’s called making an idol in your image; a god who suits you without honoring the true God who gave you life. God tells us who he is-we don’t get to make a god and say “that’s god to me.” It’s important to listen to how God has revealed himself to us and he has done that through his son, Jesus Christ. Jesus came to save us from eternal separation from God and all we need to do is accept his love and free gift of grace. Nobody is like Jesus-no other god can satisfy like him. I pray that you will see one day that you need Jesus to save you because right now you are in danger of spending an eternity separated from all that is good and loving🙏🏻

[@jhundijamesparabacuel9757]

Just like an inventor creating a computer God create universe so big but God himself is outside of the universe.

[@roshinvarghese6879]

Is a pedophile God?

[@tracyfahrenheit97]

Yet the most probable God is the God of Christianity Also the only God who has real results. So intellectually and logically I encourage leaning towards an intelligent God. Ie the God of the bible.

[@DarkKnightArchive]

​@@mongoose4j Apologies if you see a reply from me other than this one. That was a mistake. I was referring to the question above.

[@sordidknifeparty]

The presence of real historical facts and references to real places in a written work do not imply that the work is nonfiction. There are countless fictional works that are set in countless different historical settings where many details are true to life. This in no way acts as evidence that every claim in that work is true. Each claim must be taken one at a time, and judged based on the evidence. There is ample evidence that several places that the Bible references are real. But there's also evidence to show that several things the Bible references are not real, for example The Exodus from Egypt, or Noah's flood . Sure, Jesus's existence as a real person is generally agreed upon, and that he died by crucifixion is also generally agreed upon, but as to all of the Miracles that are claimed including the resurrection, you have absolutely no evidence except the Gospels themselves , which are the books making the claims and therefore cannot act as evidence for the claims

[@DarkKnightArchive]

Historical Context: The Bible contains numerous references to real people, places, and events. While it's true that some fictional works do the same, the level of detail and the consistency found in the Bible is significant. For example, the accounts of Jesus' life, crucifixion, and the early church are corroborated by historical sources outside the Bible, including Jewish historian Josephus and Roman historian Tacitus. Archaeological Evidence: Archaeology has confirmed many details mentioned in the Bible. Excavations in places like Jerusalem, Jericho, and Nineveh have uncovered artifacts and structures that align with biblical accounts. The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, for instance, has provided manuscripts that predate previously known copies, confirming the accuracy and consistency of the Old Testament texts over centuries. Specific Events: While some events like the Exodus and Noah's Flood are debated among historians and archaeologists, there are plausible explanations and ongoing research that continue to explore these accounts. The fact that some details are still under investigation does not invalidate the entire biblical narrative. Eyewitness Testimony: The New Testament, particularly the Gospels, are based on the testimonies of those who were contemporaries of Jesus. The authors-Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John-either knew Jesus personally or recorded the accounts of those who did. This proximity to the events they describe adds credibility to their accounts. Manuscript Evidence: The New Testament has an unprecedented number of manuscript copies, over 5,800 in Greek alone, dating back to the early centuries. This allows scholars to cross-check and verify the texts' reliability, ensuring that what we read today is a faithful representation of the original writings. The Resurrection: Regarding the resurrection, it is indeed a miraculous claim, and miracles by their nature defy ordinary expectations. However, the transformation of the apostles, who went from frightened followers to bold proclaimers of Jesus' resurrection, willing to die for their belief, provides a strong testament to their conviction. The empty tomb, the post-resurrection appearances, and the rapid growth of the early church all point towards the resurrection as a historical event rather than a legend. In conclusion, while the Bible does contain references to real places and people, which alone don't prove its entire narrative true, the historical, archaeological, and textual evidence collectively provide a compelling case for its reliability. Each claim should indeed be judged on its own merits, and when we do so with the Bible, we find a remarkable level of historical accuracy and consistency."

[@jd6473]

Why does he dress like a demon?