I have just read these posts. I was born in 1934. In 1940 I lived in Hampstead North London. Parliament Hill was a hill on Hampstead heath which overlooked the whole of London. I watched the Battle of Britain from that hill. Later, after we had won the Battle of Britain, I spent the whole of the London blitz, sheltering from the bombing, in a basement in Flask Walk Hampstead. As a child, we thought that the war was a big adventure. We, as kids, had aircraft recognition books, both British and German. I know I was only a child, but I never saw any fear. Loss of life and possessions was sad but it only made us more determined to win. There was never any talk of surrender.
@ProFettMoHaMett4 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤
@bobbybates26143 жыл бұрын
I was bourn 13yrs after ww2 as a child my late mum told me things she did during the war in the 70s a programme came on the tv called the world at war showing actual film and people telling what they did
@arcpvp43072 жыл бұрын
@@bobbybates2614 u were not alive then
@mrprogress59222 жыл бұрын
Beautiful post ✨✨✨
@therealunclevanya2 жыл бұрын
@@arcpvp4307 World at War was firstvshown on TV in the 70s he was refering to that not a live experience
@roddaman75457 жыл бұрын
1:59 NEVER, store extra ketchup packets on your gunsight!
@topivaltanen44323 жыл бұрын
I can imagine them rolling to McDonalds car lane saying "nicht ketchup".
@vivekshivdasani95218 ай бұрын
Ha Ha Ha
@donaldparlettjr32958 жыл бұрын
Nothing more exciting than watching Spitfires peeling off at the end, absolutely marvelous!
@mickb38599 ай бұрын
Number 3 sloppy.. Tighten up..
@keithrose69319 ай бұрын
Ruddy marvellous !
@lawrencemarocco81972 жыл бұрын
While the film puts emphasis on the Spitfire, the bulk of the battle was carried by the "old school" Hurricanes. The typical order of battle was for the slightly faster and more nimble Spits to engage and draw off the fighter escorts so the sure and steady Hurricanes could swarm in on the bombers. Proved a very effective tactic.
@johnsmith-ij2so2 жыл бұрын
Battle of Britain pilots have said that was a bit of a myth. In the chaos of air combat you attacked whatever was in front of you, it wasn't realistic to split the targets like that.
@graemegalvin8112 жыл бұрын
At the time of filming there were not that many Hurricanes about to even form a squadron.
@ExcellentEngineering19662 жыл бұрын
@@graemegalvin811 I am pretty sure they had only 1 airworth Hurricane when this was filmed. If you look when hurricanes are on screen, its acually just 1 hurricane and BF109's with a different paint job
@Emdee56322 жыл бұрын
I believe all the He-111s and Me-109s were Spanish variants, still in flying condition. The movie shows only a couple of German aircraft types; no Do-17s, no Ju-88 (bombers), no Me-110s (escort fighters) ... I guess there were not enough of them in flying condition to form a Schwarm or even a Staffel. Or maybe not a single one of them could fly anymore, more than 20 years after the war. I didn't realize this the first time I saw Battle of Britain because I was too young, but I was already building plastic model kits of WW2 aircraft and at a certain moment I noticed the lack of German bomber types in the movie.
@MrMoorkey2 жыл бұрын
Weren't many Hurricanes still flying. Spitfires, however, were still numerous.
@theflyer49162 жыл бұрын
My favorite movie of all time. My Dad took me to a theater see it the day before Thanksgiving 1970 in NJ. Those scenes stuck in my mind forever. I built models of every plane used in that movie. Back then, a Heinkel 111 was hard to find!
@jasonmussett21292 жыл бұрын
THE Flyer. The Airfix Heinkel 111. Good memories 😀😀😀
@YDDES Жыл бұрын
@theflyer4916. ”Every plane” or ”every type of plane”? I would guess the later alternative…
@theflyer4916 Жыл бұрын
@@YDDES I’d say you’re right, but I sure would have loved every one!
@rodgeranderson49224 жыл бұрын
The Spitfire didn't have to be in two places at once - the Hurricane was already there and twice as many of them.
@jimduffy19674 жыл бұрын
Hurricane shot down most enemy bombers,much more stable platform than the spitfire which hunted German bombers escorts ie the ME 109 which the spitfire was designed for,ie a fighter/ interceptor,but the hurricane was more rugged, roles were initially interceptor ,ie bombers ,then it took on the role as fighter/ bomber, ground attack , strafe,ivy no doubt the spitfire was a good plane,but in my humble opinion the hurricane did as much for the war effort probably more.check the records out any of you latter day experts.
@steriskyline44704 жыл бұрын
great comment!
@MegaBadgeman4 жыл бұрын
@@jimduffy1967 I'm sure there was Spitfire snobbery from some German pilots, saying they got shot down by a Spitfire when in fact it was from a Hurricane.
@jimduffy19674 жыл бұрын
@@MegaBadgeman you are spot on there David, hurricane was a good gun platform,not as manouverble as a spitfire but I'm sure during battle of Britain it downed more enemy bombers, spitfire was there to intercept enemy escort fighters.
@johnbarton75434 жыл бұрын
@@jimduffy1967 The fighters had different roles. The spitfires tackled the german fighters so that the hurricanes could down the bombers.
@Indoor_Carrot7 жыл бұрын
Just imagine being in a bomber, desperately struggling to get out and seeing the ocean getting closer. Must have been terrifying last moments for the crew. :(
@Harleylovinchelley13 жыл бұрын
It's a lousy way to die so a madman can conquer the world.
@jackietang37893 жыл бұрын
At least those crews got a quick and painless death somewhat instead of outright drowning to death as their plane started to sink to the bottom of the ocean.
@craigolive8033 жыл бұрын
Nobody asked the Nazi's to visit!
@jnik_32343 жыл бұрын
@@craigolive803 not all German soldiers were Nazis.
@AlexanderDunetz3 жыл бұрын
Warhammer : The reason that USA , UK , and USSR defeated Germany is because the Allies were more violent. Humane existentialism such as you profess betrays hesitation to kill the enemy. You are hereby dismissed from RAF fighter training program.
@alansbinnie14465 жыл бұрын
For us Britons, when the music kicks in, your heart swells. Thank God for the RAF and all the Empire and other allied pilots.
@HowardHalifax5 жыл бұрын
Absolutely.
@marine-pilot45115 жыл бұрын
For us yanks too!
@marine-pilot45114 жыл бұрын
Yes sir!~!!!!
@harrycurrie96644 жыл бұрын
Yes, 101 New Zealand pilots in that battle, 30 Aces, and the commander of air defence over London, ( Sir) Keith Park.
@Durnelis81484 жыл бұрын
@George Job oh god here come the fucking oil hoarders
@Grayman582 жыл бұрын
A masterpiece for 1969 no CGI . Real flying .
@annawithers40162 жыл бұрын
In 2015, we went to RAF Duxford, for the 75th Battle of Britain anniversary, can't believe how the years have passed! Anyway, to hear that beautiful Merlin engine in the Spitfires and Hurricanes was absolutely fabulous! They had some German fighters there too, and enacted a 'section squadron scramble'. Then they had a dogfight over the airfield. Brilliant day, perfect weather! Everyone was so very proud, great memories!
@walterkronkitesleftshoe66842 жыл бұрын
Back in the days before the corporate globalists made their power grab. Heady days indeed.
@46FreddieMercury912 жыл бұрын
I can remember when it was the 40th anniversary. The years do indeed fly by
@davidahlstrom75332 жыл бұрын
I was there at Duxford also in 2015. It was a great week - even some WW1 vintage British and German aircraft were in the sky doing precision flying and diving / strafing runs. I couldn't help but wonder if there were more films coming with the real, vintage aircraft (and capable pilots).
@scorpio8716 Жыл бұрын
👍
@johnbarton75432 жыл бұрын
I actually saw a lot of this from parliament hill Hampstead London. I was six at the time.
@larry4789 Жыл бұрын
My dad took me to see this at 'the pictures' in Preston in 1969 Pity there was only Heinkels and no Dorniers. Best war film ever. Polish Hurricanes joining RAF Spitfires is my favourite part (bloody marvellous) and the music is brilliant. I'm sure my ex Lancaster rear gunner dad had some sympathy for the enemy bomber crews in the film.
@BradBrassman Жыл бұрын
There were no Dorniers left. Spitfires and Hurricanes shot them all down.
@larry4789 Жыл бұрын
@@BradBrassman hahaha what about the balsa wood Stuka models
@essexfarmer9610 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for his service. My Mum's cousin was in the Dam Buster squadron as a Lancaster pilot and his bomb blew the bottom out of the Tirpitz in a Norwegian fjord. He got shot down on way home and bailed out over an island and was a POW. They were men alright.
@brettlloyd44466 жыл бұрын
Great aerial movie footage with real aircraft makes this a treat. A recent movie nowadays would use CGI which isnt the real thing
@asphaltmilkshake459610 ай бұрын
"We will fly in tight, disciplined formation in order to concentrate our defensive guns and...." "Spitfire!" *"BREAK FORMATION!"*
@hazmat57498 ай бұрын
My Mum, she's 95 now, lived in Surrey during the war; she can remember watching spitfires fighting enemy planes in the blue summer skies of 1940.
@mrrobg61 Жыл бұрын
No CGI. Every plane was a real item flying. This type of film will never be seen again.
@tkd46 ай бұрын
@@mrrobg61 seeing the spitfire sweep past the Bombers at the angle they did and the music playing. Hairs on the back of my neck standing up
@tonyclifton2654 жыл бұрын
on just one day during the battle of britain, my grandfather was singlehandedly responsible for downing 30 Heinkels. Hitler called him the worst mechanic in the Luftwaffe.
@matthewcaughey88984 жыл бұрын
Great way to find yourself with a K98 in your hands, wearing a trench coat, on a slow train to the eastern front
@tompease88104 жыл бұрын
We owe a lot to the British well done also a great war movie
@BrokenAngelWings3 жыл бұрын
What I love about this movie is: You also see how allied planes get shot down and not just a few but a good amount of them. That is way more realistic than that what Hollywood does. Hollywood only shows axis getting their ass kicked and only for a dramatic scene where a friend of the protagonist has to die/ the protagonist has to get injured is one of the axis able to actually do shit
@tartzmir79342 жыл бұрын
„Help yourselves everybody , there‘s no fighter escorts“ that really just shows how excited these lads are
@davegeisler78022 жыл бұрын
" well done lads , home and tea " 🇬🇧👍
@mrunning102 жыл бұрын
I believe that's what Plumber said to York.
@DerekVale-i9k9 ай бұрын
The navigator's map (at 0:33) clearly shows a large yellow area towards the top fold, which is Edinburgh - and a smaller yellow area towards his cuff, which is Berwick on Tweed. Over the sea, the red line is the aircraft's planned route and the black line is the aircraft's actual track. Just of the coast there are 2 black lines that intersect with the planned route and these black lines lead to Edinburgh and Berwick on Tweed, which is strange given that this particular raid was ostensibly against airfields in the Vale of York (15 Aug 1940). As was quite correctly stated at the start of this clip, this is well outside the range at which the Luftwaffe could have provided a fighter escort and it is also true that a Spitfire cannot be in the north and the south at the same time. However, the flaw is the implied belief that all of the RAF's fighter squadrons were engaged in the air war over London and the southern counties. I'm sure the map is not of German origin as it looks remarkably similar to those that I used when I joined the RAF in 1972!
@ETERNAL4U-i8m5 ай бұрын
Awesome observation ❤
@petergeorge22326 жыл бұрын
This scene from the film is based on a real event, an attack on northern Britain by a group of unsupported Heinkel bombers based in Norway. They did not attack in the early stages of the battle as it was too far for fighters to escort them, and they knew they would be sitting ducks without support. In the opening of the scene we see two German officers talking. One gives his commander a report claiming high losses of British fighters. But his commander points out that German aircraft attacking in the south continue to be met with large numbers of fighters. He therefore concludes that this can only be happening if fighters from the north have been brought down to replace losses. They therefore make the decision to make a bombing attack on the north, believing it to be unprotected by fighters. This was completely wrong, as the Germans had considerably over estimated British losses and British ability to replace losses. The result is what is depicted in this clip. In the actual event the Germans dumped their bombs and headed for home without reaching their target. They nevertheless suffered a loss of about 10% of their Norway based bomber group, or almost thirty planes. There were no British losses.
@nottmjas3 жыл бұрын
Only 10%. Were our boys feeling charitable in not wanting to shoot down even more?
@jamesdisalvo8143 жыл бұрын
That's right, but they were Ju-88s, not Heinkels. After that raid and a few other equally disastrous ones, the Germans withdrew their Norway-based group from the battle. Likewise with the Stukas. Even though they were the only planes the Germans had accurate enough to take out RADAR towers, the losses in the Stuka groups were so high that they were withdrawn after about a week. The Germans never caught on to Chain Home anyway, so they viewed the RADAR towers as lower priority targets.
@jamesdisalvo8143 жыл бұрын
@@nottmjas The rest scattered. The British fighters didn't have the range to chase them down. Also, the fighter pilots were new pilots, so they weren't very good at navigating over open water.
@fus149hammer5 Жыл бұрын
@nottmjas They would have liked to have sent every bomber down into the north sea but as spitfires only had enough .303 ammunition for 14.7 seconds of firing, unless they hit something vital immediately it would take most of that ammunition to take down one bomber. In reality that's what saved the bombers.
@martynparkman83324 жыл бұрын
I've lived and worked outside the green and pleasant land for 20 years. I watch this movie once a month to remind me who I am. And zulu and last night of the proms.
@frostyfrost40943 жыл бұрын
Welcome home
@tierone47614 жыл бұрын
The guy at 0:05 with the puffy cheeks was also the Sergeant in the Tiger Tank from Kelly’s Hero’s, that Clint Eastwood was able to convince him into blasting a hole in the door of a bank the tank crew was guarding so they could all loot the gold that was inside. Good Day Everyone!
@frostyfrost40943 жыл бұрын
Oddball?
@MrEddieLomax9 ай бұрын
For those wondering what was happening here, the Germans realized we would not be able to defend everywhere. So the cunning plan was to attack the un-defended north of England. Alas, the flaw was that the RAF rotated squadrons in and out of combat, and the north was where they were rested. So they got hammered by experienced and well-rested pilots while having no fighter escort...
@MarkHarrison7338 ай бұрын
It was irrelevant.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe66848 ай бұрын
@@MarkHarrison733 Yes the Germans though it was SO irrelevent that they decided to sacrifice 1700 of their aircraft in the summer of 1940 complete with their "experten" aircrews for utterly NO reason at all .
@MarkHarrison7338 ай бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 It was because the RAF was bombing cities and towns in Germany from 11 May 1940 onwards.
@manilajohn01827 ай бұрын
@@MarkHarrison733 Yeah, that was debunked a few decades back. The small town in question was accidentally bombed by He- 111s.
@MarkHarrison7336 ай бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 As soon as Stalin broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact on 28 June 1940 the OKW started preparing for Barbarossa.
@tedthesailor1722 жыл бұрын
There was a Terrific music score with this movie, which could shift from the dramatic, to triumphal, then almost to tragedy & despair with just changes in tempo and prominence of lead instruments ...
@raypurchase8012 жыл бұрын
Two different composers. Both created masterpieces.
@charlierivera99107 жыл бұрын
The scene of the bombers breaking formation at 1:08 was recycled for Das Boot when the U-Boat base was attacked near the end of the movie. (Yes, 'Luftwaffe' planes bombing Kriegsmarine bases.) The twin-engined bombers then transformed to single-engine aircraft later in that scene.
@mrabramstank70376 жыл бұрын
2:00 He got hit so hard all the ketchup squirted to of his burger! - Squire
@infectedpotato1176 жыл бұрын
Yup
@Grayman582 жыл бұрын
When this movie was made I was in junior school in England it happen that they were filming close by and we could see dog fighting in the sky above our school I never forget the sound especially the spitfires 🇬🇧
@kennethmiller8134 жыл бұрын
Truly a GREAT GREAT MOVIE reenacting the Battle of Britian! The music, actors and actress, authentic planes and location. One of the best war movies! Very under rated.
@CaesarCassius4 жыл бұрын
Bad editing, bad movie
@kennethmiller8134 жыл бұрын
@@CaesarCassius Opinions vary bub. Your in the minority.
@frostyfrost40943 жыл бұрын
You mentioned location. Duxford lost a hangar in the making of this film no one gave the film company permission
@michaelbolton77908 ай бұрын
That scene surely brings a lump to my throat when you see those young brave pilots defending this country from an invasion when you consider what's going on in this country today, it's 'soul destroying'.
@MarkHarrison7338 ай бұрын
Hitler never intended to invade the UK.
@MrPatrickworthington8 ай бұрын
He might have tired it if the Germans had won the Battle of Britain and achieved air supremacy.
@walterkronkitesleftshoe66848 ай бұрын
@@MarkHarrison733 "The Fuhrer And Supreme Commander Of The Armed Forces. The Fuhrer's Headquarters. 16th July, 1940. 7 copies Directive No. 16 -- On Preparations For A Landing Operation Against England Since England, in spite of her hopeless military situation, shows no signs of being ready to come to an understanding, I have decided to prepare a landing operation against England, and, if necessary, to carry it out. The aim of this operation will be to eliminate the English homeland as a base for the prosecution of the war against Germany and, if necessary, to occupy it completely." But as we both know the first phase of the operation, that being the battle of Britain, was smashed, meaning the rest of the plan was academic. The operation had been stopped in its first phase. What would be described in common parlance as "A resounding British victory".
@MarkHarrison7338 ай бұрын
@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 As soon as Stalin broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact on 28 June 1940 the OKW started preparing for Barbarossa. Sea Lion was a deliberate bluff while the Axis prepared for Barbarossa, as Galland and von Rundstedt confirmed in 1940.
@MarkHarrison7338 ай бұрын
@@MrPatrickworthington The Battle of Britain was irrelevant as the Kriegsmarine could never have got past the much larger Royal Navy, which in any case was to continue the war from Canada.
@baronvoncarrotz53177 жыл бұрын
This Scene Is A Hell Of A lot More Accurate Then The Entire Pearl Harbour Movie
@forrestcalkins937 жыл бұрын
BaronVonCarrotz yep very true lol, the heinkle he 111 were lousy bombers and did horrible in England
@charlesfiscus42353 жыл бұрын
The only thing accurate about the Pearl Harbor movie is that the date.
@angrymi-24v383 жыл бұрын
Pearl harbour is a sh*t
@thegamingbrit46773 жыл бұрын
@@angrymi-24v38 just watch tora tora tora it’s much more accurate.
@thegamingbrit46773 жыл бұрын
@@angrymi-24v38 but yes I agree it is awful
@CunySark3 жыл бұрын
For those upset about the 'realism', the dialogue at the start explains that the Luftwaffe believed the northern fighter reserves had been moved south and that unescorted long range missions from Norway to the NE of the UK would be reasonably safe. Yes they did have bf 110 escorts in reality but since there were none available for filming and they were virtually useless in that role, the film didn't bother with them. All this can be established if you just google 'Luftwaffe unescorted' and do less than a minute of reading rather than let your emotions do the typing.
@wadesaleeby21723 жыл бұрын
Who won the war?
@CunySark3 жыл бұрын
@@wadesaleeby2172 I guess that's supposed to be a 'written by the victors' argument? Again, if you read just a little about the production of the film or the long range role of the Norway based Luftflotte 5 in the battle, then there is nothing to complain about here. Is the counter-argument here that the Germans somehow lost the Battle of Britain without making any miscalculations worthy of a single scene in a film covering the whole campaign?
@tedthesailor1723 жыл бұрын
The fact remains that northern cities were heavily mauled, with Hull being the most heavily-bombed city of all, facing 95% housing damaged or destroyed...
@CunySark3 жыл бұрын
@@tedthesailor172 Ok, but this scene is about Luftlotte 5 being sent from Norway with inadequate cover in daylight, losing 15% of their aircraft and consequently never coming back. The fact that other Luftflotte successfully bombed Hull in night-raids doesn't detract from the realism of this scene and neither me nor the film claimed that parts of the North weren't bombed.
@tedthesailor1723 жыл бұрын
@@CunySark I wasn't criticising the movie, just stating a historical fact...
@dunruden97207 жыл бұрын
Around 37% of "kills" were made by Spitfires. The Hurricane accounted for about 63% in the Battle of Britain, but they always feature the Spit because it's sexier.
@nicholasramsey53317 жыл бұрын
I had no idea. I always knew that the Hurricane was involved somewhat during the Battle of Britain, but this movie gave me the impression that the Spitfire dominated the show without question.
@LonnieVScott7 жыл бұрын
Generally the Spitfires tangled with the fighters, and the Hurricanes went after the bombers.
@nicholasramsey53317 жыл бұрын
That makes perfect sense, since the Spitfire was faster and more agile than the Hurricane. I heard that the Spitfire was highly competitive with the Messerschmidt.
@willumfisher7 жыл бұрын
The 109 was quicker, but the Spitfire's elliptical wings gave it a tighter turning circle - it could out-turn a Messerschmitt on its tail or when hunting, get the inside angle
@nicholasramsey53317 жыл бұрын
So that's why the Spitfire had such elliptical wings. I had always wondered about that.
@skunkworksalpha4 жыл бұрын
Back when they used real airplanes and real blood to make movies. Terribly hard on the actors pool though, burning through those extras like that.
@rictusmetallicus3 жыл бұрын
Real blood for sure. Heinz Yankee blood: grown, not made
@andybawn12 жыл бұрын
Has to be the BEST world war 2 movie ever made, remember going to see it when it first came out
@sontungle26412 жыл бұрын
"Help yourselves everybody, there are no fighter escort" 🤣🤣🤣
@bobg66384 жыл бұрын
Beautiful planes. Both the British and Germans knew how to build amazing aircraft.
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
Which hasn't changed to this day and when the two work together they can create something very special indeed, just look at the Eurofighter Typhoon
@SuperTinman20094 жыл бұрын
Bob G,my dad RAF Spitfire pilot WW2. Said Hurricane won the Battle of Britain(more stable gun platform). He got to fly a Bf109 post-war,said best plane ever built!
4 жыл бұрын
SuperTinman2009 I play a flight simulator called IL2 Sturmovik, I enjoy flying German planes the most but damn, the spitfires are sooooooo nice!
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
@@SuperTinman2009 I'd say the Hurricane, better bomber interceptor, the Spitfire, better dogfighter. Both could do either role well though, and the BF109 was of course a very worthy and capable foe for both too
@1IbramGaunt4 жыл бұрын
@ great game series that, played it before myself too 🙂
@hansmeier55364 жыл бұрын
My uncle was an RAF officer during the war. according to him it was not as easy as shown here. he also claimed that whenever the last generation of Bf 109 showed up, nicknamed the Black Death by the RAF, everybody said his prayers, including the Spitfire pilots.
@ProFettMoHaMett4 жыл бұрын
Hans Meier... RAF... Well... Do you have a British uncle?
@danglingdave17874 жыл бұрын
nah there wasn't any advances of 109s on the western front after the battle of britain hitler foolishly invaded the soviet union so most of the Luftwaffe was sent their besides why waste time on prop planes when the Germans were throwing so much into their early jet fighter's.
@christopherdean13264 жыл бұрын
The Spitfire is, of course, the most beautiful thing in the sky, but even as a Britisher, I have to admit that the Heinkel was a pretty good looking aircraft itself. Very clean lines.
@ayush213994 жыл бұрын
Yup
@firingallcylinders29494 жыл бұрын
The BF-109 is a good looking plane as well. Tbh most planes of WWII just look awesome, not many look bad. The B-17 is amazing and large, the P-38 lightning looks weird and awesome. The Japanese Zero looks sleek.
@KrautGoesWild3 жыл бұрын
00:07 - "Not even a Spitfire can be in the South _and_ the North at the same time!"... ...it's been 30+ years since I last saw this movie but I'm sure that snotty grin is gone when the casualty reports come in.
@Falconfire8517 жыл бұрын
This attack took place in the Northern area of England. In the previous scene of this film one of the German Majors was like: "Not even a Spitfire can be in the North and the South at the same time." They thought the RAF had concentrated their fighters in the South...they were wrong.
@christopherdean13264 жыл бұрын
The poor bloke at 2:40, turns in his seat and sees THREE Spitfires coming towards him!!!
@Guoenyi7 жыл бұрын
2:01 lol WTF was that British fighter shooting Old El Paso chuncky tomato salsa?
@nightrise457 жыл бұрын
Top secret weapons from mexico ;)
@splatoonistproductions53457 жыл бұрын
Guoenyi they didn't have cgi and shit back then so this was better than anything back then
@paulbrooker52032 жыл бұрын
I watched them filming this from my school playground on the south coast, great film .
@raypurchase8012 жыл бұрын
Do you remember the "Battle of Britain" bubblegum cards? I had a Dinky Spitfire.
@paulbrooker52032 жыл бұрын
@@raypurchase801 I dont remember them but I remember the premier of the film in my town and they had a full sized spitfire and hurricane outside the cinema. That was cool for a boy my age .
@raypurchase8012 жыл бұрын
@@paulbrooker5203 Agreed. There was a Spitfire at my local shopping centre too. I rode my bike there and spent ages, just gazing at it.
@paulbrooker52032 жыл бұрын
@@raypurchase801 back in the good old days when films were made without CGI in every scene.
@raypurchase8012 жыл бұрын
@@paulbrooker5203 The good old days when there didn't need to be a subplot about a black gay man, struggling for liberty in the face of overt racism and homophobia.
@johnbower74522 жыл бұрын
Defo up there with the best war films made.
@gtheritage10 ай бұрын
How quintesentially British - ''Break it off, home for tea''😊
@philldavies79409 ай бұрын
it was the war, times were hard, hence tea but no muffins. It was a hard life in the RAF.
@vivekshivdasani95219 ай бұрын
The surviving Luftwaffe bomber pilots of this battle remembered these moments as terrifying as this was their first taste of battle and many of them barely twenty years old.
@daneelolivaw6028 ай бұрын
I worked for a man in the 1980s that flew Lancaster Bombers in the war, he flew many missions over Germany, HE WAS 19 years old. and many other RAF aircrew were much the same age.
@j.43326 ай бұрын
The Luftwaffe shat themselves after realising the RAF had more planes than they were told.The Luftwaffe records showed that their doctors began to comment upon "Kanalkrancke" Channel sickness".Pilots began showing dicky tummies etc..Funny they had a song too about bombing England.
@stephenbesley31773 жыл бұрын
Squirty ketchup eyes, highlight of the movie. Damned good shooting too
@stephenbesley31773 жыл бұрын
@ 4:32 I swear the pilot tells him to get his Tomato Heinz ready too
@daviddecker94573 жыл бұрын
The spitfire was shooting paint balls.
@davidbrown54112 жыл бұрын
There's a Jumo HE111 engine on display at Bamburgh Castle, which was pulled from the North Sea by a trawler. Surprisingly well preserved.
@terrywisland49995 ай бұрын
I first saw this movie while visiting my British grandparents in Martham England in 1969. My grandfather was one of the troops evacuated from Dunkirk. He served in the Royal Artillery.
@MarkHarrison7335 ай бұрын
The worst defeat Britain had ever suffered.
@tedthesailor172 Жыл бұрын
Truly brilliant movie, with a music score to match...
@MarkHarrison733 Жыл бұрын
This film was an awful flop.
@tedthesailor172 Жыл бұрын
@@MarkHarrison733 That was true of other movies in their time. Carpenter's "The Thing" dropped so heavily into the sin-bin that it adversely affected his career for years to come. Now of course, it is regarded as an SF horror masterpiece.
@jeffsmith20226 жыл бұрын
It still is one of my favourite films, ever...
@steriskyline44706 жыл бұрын
Yep me too! Remember first watching it with my grandfather when I was 6 and loved it ever since
@captaintrizer5 жыл бұрын
Totally! Eat lead Jerry!
@StonyRC2 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this movie as an 11 year old boy and enjoying watching "the RAF giving the Germans a good thrashing". Now I just see the portrayal of young men dying and I can only imaging the heartbreak for every family that lost their loved ones. Doesn't seem so glorious any more.
@BradBrassman2 жыл бұрын
The "glory" is in the RAF victory against a vicious regime and huge odds.
@LuisGax762 жыл бұрын
"RAF victory" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 most of them Polish and Czech pilots, who were later betrayed and ignored by their "allies". Brits can never win a war by themselves. Even in the Malvinas (Falklands) they had to get USA and Chilean help (guess from who? from the genocide Augusto Pinochet) to defeat the brave and courageous Argentinian Air Force.
@grahamlowe73882 жыл бұрын
@@LuisGax76 sounds like those thrashings are still hurting there.
@cuthbert2462 жыл бұрын
@@LuisGax76 Some Polish/ Czech etc BUT the majority were British and I have studied the BofB and yes the the Poles were betrayed by Churchill and Atlee for political reasons BUT they were not the first or last politicians to betray other countries the US has been 'doing' for years.
@HydroSnips2 жыл бұрын
@@LuisGax76lmao Cope more.
@RomilosFronimides4 жыл бұрын
2:55 One of the most GLORIOUS EPIC music covers, ever!
@kyleJohn19974 жыл бұрын
2:00 "Aah! I got tomato sauce in my eyes!!!"
@TheMadVulpen4 жыл бұрын
He commited XD
@alansbinnie14464 жыл бұрын
Only two of "The Few" still alive now. Well God Bless all of them for what they did.
@jacobmendez35723 жыл бұрын
Bomb civilians?
@Passkool3 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmendez3572 what?
@David-dl6zg3 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmendez3572 "The few" referes to Winston Churchill's famous speech about fighter pilots and not bomber pilots you liberal fu#kwit. And if you think the bombing was unnecessary you're wrong, it was total war against a truly evil regime and it all helped deny the enemy rescources and personell, perhaps you would rather the world was now controlled by Nazi's.
@williamspencer28993 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmendez3572 fuck off
@jacobmendez35723 жыл бұрын
@@williamspencer2899 what they bombed civilians
@ianluetkehans78223 жыл бұрын
TO ALL RAF FIGHTER PILOTS THANK YOU FROM AN AMERICAN
@michaelwatson97113 жыл бұрын
As a grandson of a Bob pilot I thank you sir.
@heleniumsun3 жыл бұрын
all luftwaffe pilots thank you from Germany
@garyseeseverything86153 жыл бұрын
You should thank the Americans they saved British but people like you don’t read. You have no clue.
@andreistoica24703 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Heroes over Europe british pilots
@ChrisCrossClash3 жыл бұрын
@@garyseeseverything8615 Look at all these sad pathetic twats with there anti British B.S again, you mad cause you wanna take all the glory as an American for winning the Battle of Britain on your own? 😂😂😂😂
@Wadaryu1000Ай бұрын
Ebsolutely marvelous - good show chaps!
@mattp.39497 жыл бұрын
This aerial battle you see is loosely based on a real-life air raid in northeast England just north of Hull on the afternoon of August 15, 1940 where 65 He 111's of KG 26 escorted by 34 ME 110s in two separate formations from airbases in Norway. Elements of nine RAF squadrons intercepted it over the North Sea. In actuality eight Heinkel 111s were lost as well as eight ME Bf 110s with no British losses. Shortly thereafter, 50 Junker 88 bombers of KG 30 attacked with no fighter escort. They heavily damaged the RAF airfield at Driffield before being intercepted where seven Ju 88s were lost to Spitfires, plus one to ground fire AAA.
@bryanwilson18067 жыл бұрын
Matt P. Really? I never would've guessed seeing as the title is Battle of Britain
@charlesfiscus4235 Жыл бұрын
I had heard of that raid , the Luftwaffe didn't have fighter escort for that far of a raid. Hence their bombers got chewed up
@sonrouge7 жыл бұрын
Only thing dumber than sending out Heinkels without fighter escort is sending out Stukas without fighter escort.
@VirgoVirgo-eh5gf7 жыл бұрын
sonrouge exactly!!!
@PixelatedBlu7 жыл бұрын
It's because they didn't think the spitfires would be in the north too, but as you see they were wrong.
@robattewell60872 ай бұрын
They were told that the RAF was concentrated in the South, which to a certain extent was true, they didn't know about airfield in 13 group and Northern 12 group, they were simply caught out, they never tried a raid from. Norway again
@arkie1411 ай бұрын
Tomato one to group- you're too slow... KETCHUP! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@josephselvaratnam313611 ай бұрын
Well Tommy needs some ketchup with them damn chips!! Got it in time for tea!!
@Vikingr4Jesus59197 жыл бұрын
"Home and tea lads. FOR ONCE you deserved it, well done everybody!" LOL
@vollelektrolysierer57737 жыл бұрын
Isn't it "for once you deserve it"?
@Vikingr4Jesus59197 жыл бұрын
You're right, good ol' chap! Thanks for notifying me!
@Jaksel887 жыл бұрын
Much better without CGI
@BullGator-kd6ge7 жыл бұрын
Im pretty sure there wasn't any CGI to begin with, CGI was very new and crude at the time it wouldn't be another 8 years until Star Wars would come out so when making a war movie, they either used real planes (which they did) or used remote controls, gliders, or models like Dunkirk
@pavarottiaardvark34312 жыл бұрын
How unlucky were that one crew to crash into the sea TWICE?!?!
@phaasch2 жыл бұрын
2:00 "Tomato Heinz" becomes Heinz tomato.
@shilpyrahman15312 жыл бұрын
😂 😂
@Emdee56322 жыл бұрын
It's ''Tomate Eins'' (Tomato One). He is the commander of this bomber attack. He didn't say ''Heinz''.
@phaasch2 жыл бұрын
@@Emdee5632 I know. I'm just playing word games ;))
@chevinbarghest84532 жыл бұрын
Kraft won an Oscar for the tomato ketchup
@schnurrbert2 жыл бұрын
fun fact: the wing leader's code name is "Tomate 1" 0:42😄
@cdbfullbore2 жыл бұрын
Just amazed at how many airworthy HE-111's they had in this movie. What are there like 1-2 left in the world right now?
@MrDaiseymay2 жыл бұрын
@@zdenekkopecny4928 WHY ARE YOU SO SNEERY WITH YOU REPLY ? DEPENDING ON A PERSONS AGE, HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD KNOW THAT ? IT BECAME A BIG ISSUE WHEN THE FILM WAS RELEASED, VERY FEW PEOPLE KNEW ABOUT THE SPANISH HE 111, OR THAT THEY HAD EVEN SURVIVED, AND AIR WORTHY. ONLY A FEW WERE. BUT WITH CAMERA TRICKERY, AS IN MOST WW2 FILMS, THEY MADE IT LOOK LIKE MANY. THE LAST HE111 CRASHED ON IT'S WAY TO A AIR DISPLAY AT MONTANA USA, IN 2003 BOTH CREW WERE KILLED.
@allanchurm Жыл бұрын
my late uncle was one of those spitfire pilots he survived the battle..
@Azzameen99AZ11 ай бұрын
Weather forecast for Spain that day: slightly cloudy with a chance of Heinkels.
@NK-qn6pq11 ай бұрын
The Heinkels respond to the spitfire attack by....breaking formation. Are they TRYING to get shot out of the sky?
@Azzameen99AZ11 ай бұрын
@@NK-qn6pq That's... not the reply I was expecting to my comment.
@alexazarov521510 ай бұрын
@@NK-qn6pqпотому что авторы фильма клинические идиоты..
@SubidubidubiDu1 Жыл бұрын
When you see an unescorted group of bombers in your favorite ww2 games and that gIorious music theme starts playing in your head.
@michaelbaldwin59532 жыл бұрын
0:12 - Last time I saw that German , he was in a Tiger helping blow up a bank for Sergeant Kelly !
@mrunning102 жыл бұрын
"There's a Tiger coming down the street!"
@thespokenword64562 жыл бұрын
That's right Baby, Woof woof!
@treyhelms5282 Жыл бұрын
Pretty wild that he got drummed out of the Luftwaffe and sent to the regular army. Must have been scapegoated for the northern air raid debacle. No wonder he was willing to go rogue when those crazy Americans told him about all that gold.
@icemelongreen2 жыл бұрын
One of the great aviation movies from that time period. Never again will we see aviation movies made to that scale. Because of movies like this and Tora, ToraTora I can't watch CGI made movies. Brings back memories of Model building .
@mrunning102 жыл бұрын
one day CGI will be such that we can't see the difference between CGI and this movie shot in 70mm from an opening in a B25. but not in our lifetime.
@michaelcampin14642 жыл бұрын
Most memorable line in the film Achtung Spitfire. RIP the pilots from both allied and axis airforces.
@DrCruel2 жыл бұрын
It's better with Takin' a Ride by Don Felder.
@samanli-tw3id2 жыл бұрын
RIP Luftwaffe fighter pilots who defended their cities against B-17s. But not RIP Luftwaffe bomber pilots who firebombed London!
@Roblambertbooks6 ай бұрын
My father was there on the fighter stations during the conflict and on set of the making of the movie. The first British pilot killed at the beginning of the movie was named after dad, for all his input and anecdotes to the director, crew and actors.
@MangoTroubles-0075 ай бұрын
Was your dad a Hurricane or Spitfire pilot?
@Roblambertbooks5 ай бұрын
@@MangoTroubles-007 Corporal in the Royal Signals in charge of a Bren Gun Carrier team. He manned the guns on many bombing raids of the airfields. 6 years service after demob he joined MOD Police, as he was an excellent marksman, which meant he went on various detachments, but most were with the RAF, apart from several years at the SAS Hereford in the 70s.
@mikesalyers4914 Жыл бұрын
Hey, the german that sold his tank to Odd Ball!
@tombartram7384 Жыл бұрын
Monday. RAF demonstrates how unescorted 111s in daylight face total carnage. Tuesday: Sends out a squadron of unescorted Blenheims.
@Treecko-rw1gp Жыл бұрын
That's the RAF for ya
@SlopeIndex6 ай бұрын
LOL. Followed by the USAF in 1942! It seems people rarely learn from others mistakes.
@shaggygabe7284 жыл бұрын
1:59 ''This Jerry got hit so hard he squirted all of the tomato sauce out of his burger!'' -Squire
@frefra17884 жыл бұрын
Which video ?
@shaggygabe7284 жыл бұрын
@@frefra1788 everything wrong with German aircraft
@frefra17884 жыл бұрын
@@shaggygabe728 thanks
@PuFFieS136 жыл бұрын
This film was my most favorite film when I was a kid. Watching this film in VHS with my dad a thousand time (another one was TOP GUN). I still love the film from this era. No CG, All real planes (except some radio control that they blew up and some drawing plane into the film during post process). It gives a lot more realistic feeling than those "Red Tails" kinda film
@HowardHalifax6 жыл бұрын
PuFFie I agree. Red Tails had do much CGI it was practically a computer game.
@PuFFieS136 жыл бұрын
Howard Halifax ,I totally agree. A Good air combat movie doesn’t need someone who act like he’s the best and know it all, good air combat movie doesn’t need every details accurate but built inside computer. Instead I prefer a bit less accurate (these spanish he-111 and bf109) but actually fly not something I could play in War Thunder
@PuFFieS136 жыл бұрын
Architude ,Haha I understand you. If Top Gun was released only like 5 years ago I’d feel the same to you. But back in the day, I was a lil kid and there weren’t a lot of air combat film to watch so.. it was good enough for me. Forgot to mention because it’s not quite an air combat movie but.. “Air America” was another childhood fav. of mine too!
@PuFFieS136 жыл бұрын
I mean back in the day.. say the late ‘80 we ain’t got a lot of aviation movie. If we can fast forward a bit to the early ‘90 we’d have “Flight of the Intruder” which I kinda love that film. “The Tuskegee airmen” which was 10,000 better than “Red Tails” and of course the “Memphis Belle” which was another favorite of mine. But in the late ‘80 we only got those films + the “Iron Eagle” which I think “Top Gun” does better than that film lol. But man.. the “Battle of Britain” we got the young version of Michael Caine and also the young version of Ian McShane as “Andy” plus that film was release on 1969 but it featured a 21:9 ultra wide screen and most of them look so authentic (minus some Spitfire MK.Va/IX, Buchon and Casa which standing in for BF109E and HE-111) I really love that film and still watching through this days
@HowardHalifax11 жыл бұрын
That smug German is Karl Otto Alberty - a veteran of many war movies, including The Great Escape, Kelly's Heroes, Battle of the Bulge etc. Or as my rather backward school buddy calls him...."Spitfire man"
@redmile9994 жыл бұрын
His best is the tank commander in, Kelly's heroes
@robertblake98929 ай бұрын
I have read in the actual battle the Hurricanes were usually sent against the bombers, the Spitfires tackled the fighters.
@MrEddieLomax9 ай бұрын
Here they could well have been Spitfires since they were mainly sent there to rest and got a turkey shoot by chance. Although to the Germans too often a fighter plane was always a Spitfire. We had the same mentality, hence a tank was often reported as a Tiger, I had a next-door neighbor who went into France 9 days after D-day, overnight the slit trench he was in was shelled and he then spent the next 12 months in hospital, the thing was he told me it was an 88 that hit his trench. It probably wasn't, likely a 75mm field gun, but legendary weapons get substituted in... In that way the film is completely correct with the Luftwaffe reporting Spitfires.
@nwjh19578 ай бұрын
Yes, the Hurricanes were not quite as maneuverable as the Spitfires and didn't quite have the same power/performance, but they were a very steady gun platform. So they tended to hit the bombers, while the very agile Spitfires tended to take on the fighter escort. This division tended to develop as the differences in the two fighters were recognized. The Hurricane was a very steady aircraft, but the Spitfire was somewhat less stable, which made it a bit more of a handful to fly, but wonderfully agile. The Spitfire was also much earlier in its development than the Hurricane, and so had a lot more development in the airframe. The Hurricanes actually shot down more aircraft than the Spitfires in the Battle of Britain, but the Spitfires got all the glory! The Hurricane was only really developed into a fighter-bomber after 1940, at which it excelled in many theaters, but the next generation of fighters tended to outclass it as a fighter. The Spitfire, on the other hand, was developed to far greater capabilities during the course of the war, and was still a quality interceptor at the end of the war. You''ll also notice that the RAF didn't send any Spitfires to France in 1940, only Hurricanes. At there start of the film, you can see the Hurricanes in action as the squadrons head west ahead of the Germans. The Spitfires were held back for Home defense, which is why they were something of a surprise for the Germans when they encountered them over England. To pick the difference between the Spitfires and the Hurricanes, the Spitfire has a beautiful elliptical wing shape (seen from above or below) with pointed tips, as well as two coolers under the wings, while the Hurricanes have squared-off wingtips.
@william66828 ай бұрын
True but it's also a fact that the Hurricane took out as many if not more German fighters as the Spitfire.This is because there were twice as many Huricanes in the BoB
@rogueriderhood18624 ай бұрын
That was the theory, but of course it didn't work out as neatly as that in practise. In reality it was a free for all.
@jamiebarnes48046 жыл бұрын
The spitfire was loaded with high explosive ketchup rounds
@Delogros6 жыл бұрын
Better then the Italians who used uncooked spaghetti :).
@HowardHalifax6 жыл бұрын
Delogros EY! WHATTA YOU MEAN WE USE-A THE UNCOOKED SPAGHETTI? YOU SHUTTA YOUR FACE, STUPIDO!
@jamiebarnes48046 жыл бұрын
Germans had sausages
@sambeech67716 жыл бұрын
Say what you want but it’s bloody hard to shoot with a bottle of Heinz in your face 😂
@TRockett55IRISH4 жыл бұрын
Well done lads never has so much by so many been owed to so few .
@adamg79844 жыл бұрын
And to this day, people still think a crashing plane makes that whining whirring sound. I love how films took the distinctive Stuka siren and slapped it over every diving plane ever created lol. I cannot tell you how long I thought that was just a sound planes made when they dove at high speed.
@bmused554 жыл бұрын
Much like the wilhelm scream... used everywhere!
@adamg79844 жыл бұрын
@@bmused55 True, but the Wilhelm scream at least didn't mislead me lol. I guess I could have thought a lot of people yell the same way but the damn Stuka siren made me think planes just whine as they dive lol.
@StevenBaer-zv6lq10 ай бұрын
Oh wow tomato sauce in the eyes what a terrible way to go to the great beyond in the sky
@ChuckMatley6 ай бұрын
As a former military guy I notice that the bombers broke formation to elude the fighters. In WWII American bombers held their formation in order to allow their aircrafts gunners to provide supporting fire to each other. Bombers could not elude or outrun fighters.
@jacksimpson-rogers10695 ай бұрын
The under-appreciated D-H Mosquito had wood to make its body light, and two Merlin engines. It was a bomber faster than the German fighter aircraft.
@cirrus19644 ай бұрын
And the RAF warned them flying by day!
@cirrus19644 ай бұрын
@@jacksimpson-rogers1069 This was 1940, the DH Mosquito was not involved then. Besides the fact it was never used a a daylight fighter.
@rogueriderhood18624 ай бұрын
In 1939 the RAF thought that bombers could fly in formation with gunners supporting each other. The early daylight raids put paid to that idea, so the RAF switched to night bombing. The USAAF had bigger formations and many more guns, so the tactic worked for them. Mostly.
@Kenisi112 жыл бұрын
1:59 - I am reminded of your "Spitfires fire paintballs" video, I wonder why? XD
@fus149hammer5 Жыл бұрын
This scene recreates the occasion when german bombers believing they were out of range of the RAF attacked targets in the north east of England although they were not unescorted they were accompanied by Me110's. Not as deadly as the Bf109 but still worthy of respect.
@tedthesailor1723 жыл бұрын
Call me a vicious, brutal little-Englander, but I love this movie...
@dickdastardly6353 жыл бұрын
Yes , it is a good film . It's the music as well along with 633 Squadron.
@37A-s6h4 жыл бұрын
1:58 Watched this movie when I was young and never knew about death and I laughed at him thinking he got tomatoes on his face
@MrDaiseymay3 жыл бұрын
This was a brilliant film for 1968/9 . Not historically accurate in all areas, but considering what they DID achieve, very good. It could never be remade today, without CGI. I'm happy with this version. I'm also pleased with the list of country's, also involved, who's FREE countrymen, risked their lives, and how many actually died.
@alanmackie70122 жыл бұрын
Never seen this without subtitles before. Karl Otto Alberty there. Still alive at 89 years old.
@tieroneactual22282 жыл бұрын
I remember him in “ Kelly’s Heroes”. He was a Sergeant of a tank crew.
@johnholmes81782 жыл бұрын
@@tieroneactual2228 He also arrested Richard Attenborough in 'The Geat Escape'.
@4exgold2 жыл бұрын
absolute legend.....hope he lives another 20 years
@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM Жыл бұрын
@@4exgold : Amen 🙏
@widyasantoso49109 ай бұрын
According to Wikipedia and IMDB, he passed away in 2015.
@frasermitchell91832 жыл бұрын
The reason the raid was unescorted by fighters was because it flew from Luftflotte 5 based in Norway to bomb England in the North. The Lutwaffe thought all the British fighters had been sent south, but unfortunately for them, we still had plenty left in the north. It wasn't quite a one-sided as serious damage was done to (I think) Driffield aerodrome, but nothing of real consequence.
@tonycutty598 Жыл бұрын
The only tiny complaint I have about this epic scene is the use of Stuka noises for diving German aircraft that aren't Stukas. Other than that, brilliant. None of the easily-spotted fake animation done by animators who have never seen a real aeroplane, much less know how they really fly.
@Deevo037 Жыл бұрын
Considering they didn't have operational Stukas for the film and had to use RC models they did a pretty credible job.
@josephselvaratnam313611 ай бұрын
Good point ..stuka screaming was part of the terror effect ... unique to it. Like fellow whose cars scream like they're going to tear the track apart and come up a whimper against the more silent menacing motors!!
@Deevo03711 ай бұрын
@@josephselvaratnam3136 Something the Australin made Boomerang ground attack fighter managed to reproduce. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2qQnaiMntuUo7s
@kyleJohn19974 жыл бұрын
"Not even a spitfire can be in two places at once" RAF Pilot "Hold my cuppa tea good chap"
@kyleJohn19974 жыл бұрын
@Christine Ccolgate What???
@mariacornwallis16024 жыл бұрын
@kyle presley I think you will find that was said by a senior Luftwaffe Officer
@mariacornwallis16024 жыл бұрын
Another one said to Goering "Give us a squadron of Spitfires"
9 ай бұрын
“Tomato Heinz!” Is that an advert for the blood supplier.
@Dproud27006 ай бұрын
I have read stories of RAF fighter pilots saying that they didn't have gun bursts any longer than 3-4 seconds. I have learned from this clip to count how long a gun burst lasted. The longest was 4 seconds, most gun bursts didn't last any longer than 2-3 seconds.
@tkd46 ай бұрын
This is true. I read that The plane only had enough ammo for something like 15 seconds of continuous fire.
@herodlowery49924 жыл бұрын
Thank God for the British and the Empire! They saved the world with their bravery and to their empire, they brought the telegraph, railroad and post office. I’m of Irish descent myself. I’ve been to England 🏴 many times. I love history and if there’s one place that has history, it’s England. My father and several uncles were in England during the war and all loved the British people. All hail Britannia!
@herodlowery49924 жыл бұрын
@Adhitya Sivaraman Thank you for your reply. Yes, of course I know of very bad things happened in the European colonies. King Leopold of Belgium seems particularly egregious in his treatment of Congo. I live in California USA and no country or society is without sin. The American settlers and the national government treated the “Indians” very, very badly, yes indeed they did. I cannot change the past, it is what it is. Thank you again for your reply.
@danielw58504 жыл бұрын
My grandfather came to London, from Westport, Co. Mayo and drove ambulances through the Blitz. This period in history saw the few democracies and Britain’s Commonwealth face-down the forces of a “New Dark Age” (except the Soviet Union).
@diegomediavilla56324 жыл бұрын
No they saved nothing they are the evil in the world (not the peolpe) churchill was a freemason same with Franklin d roosevelt and Stalin the allied where the real war criminals
@danielw58504 жыл бұрын
@@diegomediavilla5632 Oh dear :(
@lawrencemarocco8197 Жыл бұрын
"Help yourselves everybody, there's no fighter escort. The Heinkel buffet is open!"
@brettfavreify Жыл бұрын
The victory roll, at the end, is one of the best scenes in movie. Great soundtrack too.
@jgdooley2003 Жыл бұрын
I recall in the same film the Squadron leader, played by Christopher Plummer, berating one of his pilots for doing the exact same thing on the pretext that possible battle damage to the controls of the fighter could lead to the pilot "being spread over his airfield like strawberry jam". In reality senior officers frowned on unneeded aerobatics in wartime flying as a waste of resources and a risk to precious airplanes but the junior pilots during peacetime training were encouraged to perform such stunts as good basis for acquiring the needed fluency in flying to avoid being easy targets. The most effective pilots were those who quickly changed from showy aerobatics to using their aircraft in an economic and sparse way to shoot down as many enemies as possible and knowing when to avoid danger when that was needed. So-called "shoot and scoot" tactics.
@Quadrenaro4 жыл бұрын
0:01 Translation: "Something Jagtiger." "Bitch, I commanded a real tiger in Kelly's Heroes." Yes I know it was a "Tiger" built on the chassis of a T-34.
@tieroneactual22283 жыл бұрын
And I helped zee Americans liberate the gold from our bank!