Click here to subscribe to our channel 👉🏽 bbc.in/3VyyriM
@GiangĐặng-c2b11 ай бұрын
Today is Feb 12, 2024. I watched the video talking about the climate change. During this time, I just passed three questions mentioned in the video. First question: What is the climate change? Climate change is about the heat being added to the Earth system. Human activities like burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests that have been standing for hundreds of thousands of years create carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. The more greenhouse gas you have in the atmosphere, the more of the sun's heat get trapped in the atmosphere and the warmer the surface gets and that's why it's called greenhouse effect. 2. What are greenhouse gases? Greenhouse gases exist naturally in the atmosphere. If there's no greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the world would be too cold for comfort. Greenhouse gases on their own are actually great. It helps to insulate the Earth. The problems we are facing now is the numerous of greenhouse gases being added to the Earth. 3. What are fossil fuels? All of the systems that underpin our lives. So how we produce food to eat, how we create energy to heat our homes, how we create electricity to power our devices, how we fuel our cars. For the most part, historically, we burn fossil fuels to produce energy. Fossil fuels are essentially from plants and animals from millions of years ago. We burn fossil fuels to create heat and electricity and everything. But then we also produce carbon dioxide as a side effect.
@thecatgod3110 ай бұрын
is this for geography homework or something lol
@allayna168810 ай бұрын
@@thecatgod31 at least hes educating people
@thecatgod3110 ай бұрын
@@allayna1688 ok
@iareid82559 ай бұрын
User, that is simplistic. Co2 which most consider the most powerful actually decreases in potency as it's concentration increase on a logarithmic scale. H2O is actually far more potent and has very much more influence. That said every action has a reaction and increasing temperature increases water evaporation which is cooling. There are many other reactions which doesn't follow the more CO2 equals more heating, it's much more complex. The sun is not considered by the IPCC but it too is variable.
@melonseedlings8 ай бұрын
i only got the first question but thanks
@GreenGlowNews4 күн бұрын
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time, and understanding it is key to finding solutions. Thanks to initiatives like The Climate Question for spreading awareness and fostering global dialogue!
@inna61228 ай бұрын
Love this podcast! :) I like everything, the topic, how the interview goes, and the subtitles. I wish I had known it before, although I've been watching BBC but didn't explore this in the past. I have been listening to different podcasts, this one is the best! Wish we could have more of this informative topics! :) I'll keep this on my regular routine! 🙂🙂
@pratikmadrecha2 ай бұрын
Please bring back this podcast
@RovshanShodmonov-fl5hs7 ай бұрын
This is true , we just need to adapted the life about the climate change.the cutting down trees along the forests is the most impact on climate change
@natureexplorer19126 ай бұрын
I am not watching it for school. I am actually a nature lover and concerned about climate change.
@мир-н3л4х Жыл бұрын
I am an electric engineering statement and I do believe that there is a permanent source for producing electricity❤
@maria.s13268 ай бұрын
What is the first and foremost step that industrial nations take towards climate change?
@A.E.Anowar Жыл бұрын
I just love this episode and topic on which the whole vidoes are talked.. There is a still hope to control the adverse effects of climate changes.
@NasrullahKhan-p7b4 ай бұрын
Winter frost patterns retreating from valleys to mountains in pakistan. Paddy and maize yields falling for hybrid seds. How to reverse it
@shivakumarv301 Жыл бұрын
Is electricitic cars and scooters cutting the cost of transportation to half in Tropical countries?
@rodmartin-nl8ns Жыл бұрын
I will tell you what climate change is It is something to say when politicians want to change the subject they do it all time
@Thatsong-fr9nq4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@CH-et4go2 ай бұрын
It must be wonderful to live in such a simple world
@rodmartin-nl8ns2 ай бұрын
@CH-et4go Yes you are right it is a simple world!!! It's people like you who complicate it!!
@rodmartin-nl8ns2 ай бұрын
@CH-et4go guess it is a simple world!!! People like you complicate it Ok
@CH-et4go2 ай бұрын
@@rodmartin-nl8ns reality is complicated.
@Şirin222685 ай бұрын
Good job thank you 👍🏼
@mopuribalu27818 ай бұрын
Sir , Are the power plants collapsing cooling towers ? nijama?
@OldScientist Жыл бұрын
Climate change is not "turbocharging weather events". The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising! There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6? "There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions." "There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions." "Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)." There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
@yaluo564810 ай бұрын
Are you trying to prove climate change is natural? Heres three reasons why climate change is mostly caused by human works : My first point : Yes ,climate change can happen naturally, like in the sun , but temperature on Earth is increasing more rapidly , maybe even faster than the Sun. Human works , like different diamond or gold mines produce methane when the soil is dug up and that methane gas rises to the air , reflecting sunlight from the sun more , creating what is called a greenhouse effect , heating up the planet faster , increasing the temperature at least by 1 degrees Celsius by 2025 . My second point : Factories produce different chemicals like mercury , plastics , petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and even excess gunpowder, and a wide variety of different chemicals, killing off the plants in the water and other marine animals , making the levels of photosynthesis decrease rapidly and causing carbon dioxide emissions to drastically increase while oxygen levels would plummet, warming up the surroundings as a result , along with other greenhouse gases that are also produced. My third point : Electrical appliances, such as fridges , produce excessive chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or hydrochlorofluorocarbons , which deplete the ozone layer , heating up the climate . My fourth point : Trees in the Amazon forest the size of two football fields are being cut down every hour , and since trees help absorb carbon dioxide and other harmful chemicals, when they are cut down , they release a huge amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, causing the temperatures to warm up . My fifth reason: Nuclear power plants which generate electricity through nuclear fission also produce greenhouse gas emissions, and creates nuclear waste , which , in turn to store them , we need to cut down an estimated 2120 trees by 2026 to supply enough space for the nuclear waste , which in turn create more carbon dioxide, warming up the climate. My sixth point : The domestication of livestock are rapidly increasing, and farmers , in turn burn down more trees to supply more space , creating the haze epidemics ( 2018 -2019) in Indonesia, India and even China. On top of that , farmers try to feed their livestock as much as possible, creating more emitting of greenhouse gases (farts and burps ) which in turn warm up the surroundings even more ! My seventh point : Cars that run on gasoline create even more greenhouse emissions by chemical reactions in their engines , releasing carbon monoxide, methane , and most importantly, carbon dioxide. My eighth point : As more gasoline is used up , more fossil fuels are dip up and burnt , creating carbon dioxide, hydroxide , and much more chemicals, creating more greenhouse emissions by everything put together .
@yaluo564810 ай бұрын
My addition to my fifth point : nuclear power plants can also produce greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide ( poisonous chemical, created by burning sulfur )and other stuff that also warm up the surroundings
@yaluo564810 ай бұрын
Plus , how about the super cyclone that hit the eastern coast of New York City ? Your “evidence” of the matter seems outdated from 2019 . The cyclone was caused by - you guessed it- climate change , which is why the 1 billion oyster program was created to restore the city’s carbon footprint. How about the melting of global ice caps ? The world loses about ten metric tons of ice per year! That is about the weight of 400 elephants of ice ! How is that not caused by human activity? How about the Australian wildfires in 2019 ? This disaster was one of the largest wildfires in the world since the 2000s ! How about increasing change in rainfall patterns? Ever since humans first began to increase the greenhouse gas emissions, different floods are happening around the globe, and have you heard that Ireland is about to sink by 2190 ?
@yurialtunin91217 ай бұрын
@@yaluo5648 Nuclear power plants, producing carbon dioxide? And sulfur dioxide? How come?
@yurialtunin91217 ай бұрын
@@yaluo5648 My first point : First point. Temperature on Earth is not increasing. "Ice hockey stick" happened to be a scam. Check climategate story. My second point : Oxygen is produced via photosynthesis. Photosynthesis needs carbon. If you want to have more trees and plants - YOU HAVE TO BURN THE COAL No carbon dioxide - no plants. My third point : Ozone layer is not depleted and it is in fact OK. Are we talking about Ozone layer or climate change? My fourth point : Carbon dioxide is not a harmful chemical. It is produced in your body. Actually trees are not a major contributor to photosynthesis. It is sea plankton who is. My fifth reason: Nuclear power plant producing "gas emissions" - is just a pure lie. My sixth point : What is your proposal? Stop cows to fart? In the past huge bison herds were roving plains. What is your plan to stop them farting? My seventh point : Cargon dioxide is produced by any animal, including human being. My eighth point : Burinig coal is a good thing. Now coal is trapped by coal. We return carbon where it belongs - trees.
@gabriellehumphreys11794 ай бұрын
Pity theirs no visuals!
@gardeningwithkirk4 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤ beautiful video
@happypatel44677 ай бұрын
Hey ppls, I'm 19 yrs old engaged in my studies but at the same time I am taking care of my mother nature by planting tress and looking after for it. It's our job to save our planet, you ought to do same.......
@xychachiniyoyo Жыл бұрын
*Are Israel and Palestine conflict & Russia and Ukraine conflict not responsible for increasing global warming ?* ( even little bit )
@zimaraihashimzai8339 Жыл бұрын
They are 100% responsible, but their is none in the world to ask the ware creator why they started wars?
@cindykuo7118 Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what I just thought ...
@neer23238 ай бұрын
That's why 21st century here is no need to any warfare
@geob8172 Жыл бұрын
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
@Nartin-r8x7 ай бұрын
Maximum 2 children policy for every country would have an immediate positive impact on global warming, migrationresources, employment etc. But corporation likebbc of course wouldn't discuss the source of problem...We are human, we all consume and therefore have an impact on everything from A to Z. I don't take anyone who lectures me on global warming seriously without first addressing the issue with global over population.
@bobbobby30857 ай бұрын
Limiting offspring is going to be an unpopular solution and tbf won't even work if we tackle the root cause and live sustainably in the first place
@damirmasic74327 ай бұрын
Nije zagađenje puno to . Jednostavno ne dolazi dovoljno kisika u atmosferu.
@huyenanhtran18796 ай бұрын
thanks
@sharifullah9751 Жыл бұрын
Why now a days weather very smoggy in my country Pakistan?
@PhyuPhyu-mh2kn11 ай бұрын
Ur politicians are all corrupted so.
@hermanp.delacruz122311 ай бұрын
ITS MORE HARD TO LIVE WITHOUT IMPATHY BY OTHERS...CRUEL WORLD TO CRUEL WEATHER ISNT IT! "
@tsheringdenkar96016 ай бұрын
Wats solution for climate change now???
@dennisnorton388011 ай бұрын
Of course back in the 19th century rivers & lakes use to freeze over in the winter & there were even makets held on the Thames & Matt Taylor of the BBC said it was caused by low sun activity for years but in the last 20 years there has been high activity by the sun, does any body not think that may have something to do with climate change? Of course there have also been over 2000 nuclear bomb test since the WW2 with over 500 emitted into the atmosphere. All of these things have made differences to the worlds climate & I sincerely believe that all that radiation has caused one in two people now getting cancer.
@Ludicanti11 ай бұрын
Its me, darlu g.
@jessiewaters-m2w3 ай бұрын
Climate change refers to? long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns? Human activities are not the main driver of what we have termed, climate change. Recognising that the sun is the main contributor to our temperatures is important. It has absolutely nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas. Sun storms are correlative with the current causes of our temperature fluctuations. The 'deserts' and 'sea levels' however, 'they' indeed have been created, by mankind. Jean-François Bastin, interesting question "What if there were 1 trillion more trees?" Understandably, just how many trees do you think they are currently cutting down? So you know, 'People cut down 15 billion trees each year, on one global tree count'. United, the deforestation, estimated 46% since the beginning of human civilization. So his question, is to more than double the just over 400 billion trees on the planet. (:It would be 1.4 Trillion trees, keep in mind 800 billion estimated, before mankind;)
@HealingLifeKwikly2 ай бұрын
Actually, the research shows that the Earth has rapidly warmed while the sun's output has dimmed a notch and that ~98% of all global warming since 1900 was caused by our emissions.
@binagarten466711 ай бұрын
So why if OAP's are told to turn down the heating, to walk intead taking the car, Yet they send people they employ for a 5 min clip 1st class, with film crew, go to every sporting stage, and take all thier staff, Balding Linekar, Myrie, Rita, Chakroborty, Anita Rani,Hariry bikers, Rick Stien, Vicky Young, Sarah Smith, Nadia Huessian, Anju Adnam.
@josephs94515 ай бұрын
The real reason for the changed climate is not Co 2. There is a unique reason for this changing climate .
@HealingLifeKwikly2 ай бұрын
Thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of all global warming since 1900.
@johnweir12176 ай бұрын
On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C. Today is 4th July 2024. Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks.
@johnweir12176 ай бұрын
@grindupBaker Always insults from the climate alarmists - try polite debate - might find it refreshing !
@HealingLifeKwikly5 ай бұрын
"On 19th July 2022 UK temp. hit 40 C. Today is 4th July 2024. Temp. in Leicestershire is under 20 C CO2 has increased since July 2022 by over 70 Billion metric tons. Climate change due to CO2 is bollocks." I believe that you are sincere, but you are confusing local and short-term WEATHER on the one hand with AVERAGE GLOBAL CLIMATE on the other hand. The heat on Earth is always unevenly distributed, so man-made global warming doesn't mean that every July 4 will be hotter than every other July day in previous years--that's not how it works. We will even still set record daily cold temps in various places, but the GLOBAL AVERAGE is getting warmer, including the long-term average for the UK. So don'y be confused by random short-term weather fluctuations: The climate crisis is real, lethal, urgent, and we caused it... and it's getting worse every decade.
@bluestreak27018 ай бұрын
Just seen a BBC reporter in the south of the UK. Talking about global warming, with a hooded jacket and 3 other layers of thick fleeces. What a frarce. The major flooding in Dubia was caused by cloud seeding. In the Vietnam war America used cloud seeding. Cloud seeding technology has moved on a lot. I would not be surprised if this was not used now. All the new housing projects not one new reservoir.
@bobbobby30857 ай бұрын
What happened in dubai was not a cause of cloud seeding missions since immediately preceeding the flood there were no cloud seeding mission flown and also there have been many cloud seeding missions that have been flown and are being flown rioght now yet we havn't seen another flood on that scale anywhere
@CH-et4go2 ай бұрын
Are you dense or just another pointless bot from our planet destroying ffi?
@OldScientist2 ай бұрын
@CH-et4go Can you only offer false choices or is reality more complicated?
@CH-et4go2 ай бұрын
@@OldScientist simple answers are for the delusional and the gullible. Truth requires accepting reality.
@OldScientist2 ай бұрын
@CH-et4go Nice. You never resort to cold hard facts and data when a meaningless platitude would suffice.
@kayiness Жыл бұрын
One thing I notice about climate videos is they're too wonky and academic for regular people to take this issue seriously. It's always framed as either gloom and doom or a fun educational adventure. Nothing showing how an earth on fire will affect people's practical lives.
@thanhnguyensolo Жыл бұрын
Because it is quite gloom and doom if you want to be honest. Scienctific facts don’t give a shit about your feelings to be true. We’d accept it and act quickly or suffer the consequences
@kayiness Жыл бұрын
@@thanhnguyensolo and this approach has gotten you how far with the general public? Who you very much need?
@rodmartin-nl8ns Жыл бұрын
Yes l think we should be more serious cause fossel fuel is the big joke
@binagarten466711 ай бұрын
So why do the BBC keep sending thier presenters 1st class for a 4 min clip on some stupid, "and finally" news article and then tell OAPs, to turn down the heating an switch off the plug when they are cauing so many emissions and the poor OAP ends up in hospital with pneumonia?
@GluteusMaximus2110 ай бұрын
@@thanhnguyensolo😂😂😂 Keep going, I love to watch stupidity at work in climate change people lol. You people make me laugh so hard hearing how you actually believe the crap your spewing even though it a load of 💩 and not true. Some on my side want you to shut up but not me, I love comic relief. To see just how dumb and gullible you are!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
@renzo649011 ай бұрын
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc. Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs. Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
@deliciouspaint6 ай бұрын
What are suggesting? Abortion? Murder? I think a safer and more agreeable choice for the world would be to reduce the utility of our nonrenewable sources but not so drastically that we can't use our daily services that are run on nonrenewable energy.
@renzo64906 ай бұрын
@@deliciouspaint I was suggesting population reduction..fewer additional people.
@deliciouspaint6 ай бұрын
@@renzo6490 But even with that in mind, it's not the most easiest way out of our global issue. Imagine how upset people would get if the government restricts everyone to have fewer children then what they'd hope? Sure that could help the environment but would it truly be agreeable to the people? Activists tend to have unrealistic ideas and this is probably one of them.
@renzo64906 ай бұрын
@@deliciouspaint over population of the planet is the root cause of all our current problems.
@wolfgangbeckmann42726 ай бұрын
More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment. He let an infrared beam pass through a tube filled with CO2 and measured the emerging light intensity. Upon reducing CO2 concentration in the tube, only a tiny difference could be found and he concluded that very few CO2 molecules are enough to completely absorb the IR beam. The conclusion was that a CO2 increase could not matter.
@HealingLifeKwikly5 ай бұрын
"More then 100 years ago Knut Johann Ångström dismissed the theory with a simple experiment." That's laughable. Such a lab test cannot replicate how the real complex world of climate works, and more than a century later, THOUSANDS of much better research studies proves that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900 and that the climate crisis is lethal and urgent. Take care.
@RayblondieАй бұрын
I don't buy the BBC version of Climate change. Get back to the science not the politics.
@heart-of-people7 ай бұрын
when earth broke up?
@QwartzBeat Жыл бұрын
Climate change refers to the long-term changes in weather patterns that are observed across different regions of the Earth. These changes are primarily driven by human activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences. activities that release large amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. The effects of climate change include rising sea levels, melting glaciers and ice caps, more frequent and intense heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires, as well as more frequent and severe storms and hurricanes. The scientific consensus is that human activities are the main cause of climate change, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts and adapt to its consequences.
@markluxon5044 Жыл бұрын
Except any scientist that disagrees is cancelled
@yurialtunin91217 ай бұрын
Weather patterns remain the same. Weather is not effected by human activity. Sea level is not rising and glaciers are not melting. Storms and hurricanes are pretty much at the same level as hundred years ago. And ... one more thing. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
@yurialtunin91217 ай бұрын
@@markluxon5044 Yes you right! And even more. As soon as someone says "scientific consensus" - you should know that science stops here. Because there is no such a thing as "scientific consensus". Science is not a democracy with a majority vote.
@billv68137 ай бұрын
Don’t you mean global warming? Since we know the temperature of the earth is not increasing we had to change the name to climate change.
@bobbobby30857 ай бұрын
The temperature of the earth is increasing we started using climate change because its a more accurate description of the phenomenon previously known as global warming. The earth is warming and this warming will have a multitude of effects which in some circumstances can cause all sorts of things like more precipitation but also more drought, more heat but also more cold and can increase the frequency and magnitude of natural disasters. Now you see why we call it climate change
@rodneypantony355111 ай бұрын
Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels. KZbin Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy. Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT. Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses. It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are.
@metalkokorea7 ай бұрын
stop driving personal cars! Use buses or trains. Of course, there is not enough public transportation! Don't talk but take action before too late!
@asmamabrouk817 ай бұрын
This weather is hotter in the south of the planet so we must leave or change the climate.
@தமிழ்-வ8ப8 ай бұрын
I am bad but Earth good😂
@OldScientist Жыл бұрын
The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It warmed faster in the past. There is no climate crisis.
@henrymoodey993 Жыл бұрын
I strongly agree with you!!
@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Жыл бұрын
Numbers are showing a different picture
@OldScientist Жыл бұрын
@imtheeastgermanguy5431 No they don't. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising! There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6? "There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions." "There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions." "Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)." There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
@rawazardalan2288 Жыл бұрын
I do think that what you guys saying is just preposterously ridiculous because in my city the impacts of climate change are quite visible it caused to rise in cancer and other respiratory disease
@OldScientist Жыл бұрын
@rawazardalan2288 I am uncertain of your location and how a small increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere results in an increase in cancer rates in just your area. There are, however, lots of positive effects associated with climate change. There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%! Climate change saved 555,103 lives in England and Wales between 2001 and 2020 (ONS, 2022). There are over 5 million excess deaths per annum globally due to abnormal temperatures from the 2000-2019 study led Prof. Guo of Monash University. It found that over 90% of excess deaths were caused by excess COLD rather than excess heat. This applied globally including in the hottest continent, Africa. So, in a world with increasingly mild temperatures, there will be less excess death. Warming is good not bad. One of the main causes of death in the poorer parts of the world is attributable to air pollution. This is because they have to burn wood and dung over open fires for cooking and heating in their homes. These people need access to gas stoves and electricity to improve their health and life expectancy. They need fossil fuels to make them healthy and wealthy.
@KnezBranimir8798 ай бұрын
That is bollox. Our addition of gases does not make much difference.
@ABONE-OL74810 ай бұрын
Ziki tuttuk insanlar olarak
@senthuran747 Жыл бұрын
None of the beggar countries test nuclear weapons.
@metalkokorea7 ай бұрын
Do not use gasoline engine lawn mowers!
@GiangĐặng-c2b10 ай бұрын
Today is Feb 17, 2024. 1. Why is the Earth getting warmer considered as a global issue? Some people will be thinking I like hot weather. What's wrong with it? Some parts of the word are already pretty hot. If you are in a particularly hot city and that suddenly gets a chunk hotter, that's going to make it a lot harder to live in that city. Beyond that, around the world, we have seen first-hand the effects of the world getting warmer. Climate change is turbocharging all sorts of extreme weather events like heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires. 2. How do the climate change cause floods and? That seems to be the opposite of what some people have thought would happen. Warm water takes up more spaces than cold water. And so, you get this thing called thermal expansion. Sea level rising is due to the amount of the warm water in the sea. Besides that, hot atmosphere causes ice sheets to melt, not just melt from the top down, but also to flow faster into the ocean. We 've already seen a huge increase in the rate of ice loss. Some parts of the word are also experiencing more drought as more water gets carried away from those areas,
@Arugula10011 ай бұрын
Is this program for kids? It is not appealing to hear voices but not see faces and instead we just see some graphics. A poor communication strategy!
@sandrakippert947010 ай бұрын
Watch Frankenskies, Geoengineering watch.
@AbdullahKhan-zt6rq6 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@ANJA-mj1to11 ай бұрын
After the energy crises of the 1970s we statarted the intensive use of energy and in global characterised the era of industrialisation. Future moves in direction we reguire! For instance many European countries during the last few decades uses the hot water traditionally to supply energy. Low enthalpy sources for heating offer various spectrum of applications. It is time for all of us to prevent it with renewable energy sources!
@thecatgod3110 ай бұрын
geo homework
@voranartsirisubsoontorn Жыл бұрын
Extreme Weather is what we are facing. If it is climate change then we can predict its pattern.
@suewright33457 ай бұрын
cabon dioxide is the gas of life....duh
@bobbobby30857 ай бұрын
If it is how would you like it if we shoved you in a room with just carbon dioxide?
@pelasgeuspelasgeus463413 күн бұрын
If you think that humans are responsible for climate change tell me what caused the last glacier period. Just that.
@lolorick5885 Жыл бұрын
i don't do crappy podcasts with no video
@polypoly20232 ай бұрын
hi
@snipthesquid10 ай бұрын
*cough* geo homework
@donniemoder14668 күн бұрын
These comments are pitiful. If you don't understand that climate change is a tragedy of the commons that is incredibly difficult to stop, and is likely to end civilization and the natural world we depend on, then you are just being silly, in hopium and denial. If you don't understand "overshoot" then please consider understanding it before commenting.
there will be signs in the sun moon and stars, on earth nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea, ( luke 21v 25 )
@ApinderSingh-b2c Жыл бұрын
Earth will finish one day cuz everyone looking for extra money in this short,
@allayna168810 ай бұрын
yeah
@sesadevswain1433 Жыл бұрын
Need regulation of human consumptions
@JenniferSpearman-u2n11 ай бұрын
🇿🇦
@SunisaSeeson10 ай бұрын
🎉
@mohamedessa9484 Жыл бұрын
While other countries getting more cold
@stuartwilliams31642 ай бұрын
What is climate change ? A cashcow for the university of , fillin the blanks , follow the money , all the facts are PREDICTIONS !!!
@uzairahmad89329 ай бұрын
🚩
@303Scott Жыл бұрын
More climate propaganda.
@Cardd_inal1310 ай бұрын
WTF is this format
@StarBadger0710 ай бұрын
Propaganda
@BraveNewUs5 ай бұрын
Liars
@mrmrmrmrmr02 Жыл бұрын
Lol.
@geoffbirchall755211 ай бұрын
One word ‘hoax’
@pauldavies6037 Жыл бұрын
More BS from the BBC
@najduch269011 ай бұрын
Why nobody Talking about China ?? They produce the most CO2. Is it because business with them is profitable ?? Silly!
@yurialtunin91217 ай бұрын
CO2 is a good thing. It is a "food" for plants and trees. Without CO2 plants and trees (in fact everything with photosynthesis) will die.
@BelisarioHRomo8 ай бұрын
This is pure unadulterated PROPAGANDA!!
@AlexisBall-eh5lz8 ай бұрын
We need energy to heat and cool and run our machines etc. Renewable energy sources can’t supply enough of our energy needs. Maybe reducing the world’s population would mean we’d need to produce less energy and our reliance on fossil fuel sources would be reduced.
@Thatsong-fr9nq4 ай бұрын
Depopulation agenda
@geob8172 Жыл бұрын
Now we know that oil and gas can be formed abiotically through subterranean heat and pressure, and that the Earth contains a virtually endless supply - oil is the new ‘renewable’ energy.
@hosnimubarak8869 Жыл бұрын
Yawn.
@geob8172 Жыл бұрын
@@hosnimubarak8869 That's probably the Smartest thing you have ever said, Intelligent !
@hosnimubarak8869 Жыл бұрын
@@geob8172 Sadly, you probably think your original comment is quite witty.
@geob8172 Жыл бұрын
Well I am intelligent enough to know that Climate Change is a SCAM. That's why they stop using "Global Warming" What can effects our weather ? Look up HAARP. !
@hosnimubarak8869 Жыл бұрын
@@geob8172 Do you deny current atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are over 30% higher than they were about 150 years ago at the dawn of the industrial revolution and in the same time span the average global temperature on Earth has increased by about 0.8° Celsius (1.4° Fahrenheit) since 1880. Two-thirds of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15-0.20°C per decade, roughly ten times faster than the average rate of ice-age-recovery warming?