After reading this interview, I am very puzzled: Mr. Cai said that Taiwan has always been very concerned about and worried about the military threat from mainland China, and that all Taiwanese are united to protect Taiwan, so why are there so many Taiwanese businessmen Invest in building so many factories in mainland China until now? isn't it just to provide funds for the enemy to buy knives to stab themselves?
@sjdiaiajbehiswjqnsnj2 жыл бұрын
hhhh
@youtubeweb36362 жыл бұрын
~~by google translate~~ ~~ Merchants have no country ~~ No, those businessmen who think they are Chinese not Taiwanese Because they are brainwashed into thinking that the ROC is still owns mainland China, so they are also Chinese Like guo tai-ming (Terry Gou,Founder of Foxconn,OEM for iphone) ROC = Republic of China, 1911~1948 PRC = People's Republic of China , 1949~ ~~~ Taiwanese believe that Taiwan does not belong to China Because of the Treaty of San Francisco (8 September 1951), Japan gave up Taiwan sovereignty and did not hand it over to China. ~
@kcericleung42922 жыл бұрын
Good question, however, we seen some more Taiwanese investors already reallocate into some other south east Asia countries for running their production plants. Perhaps, the current Geo politics are heavily uncertainty in mainland for investment!
@hongliu11482 жыл бұрын
望香港可以好似烏克蘭一样有好的结局
@hongliu11482 жыл бұрын
@Tomas Lau 乌可以得到自由,专制极权下爆家没用
@hwddhwdd2 жыл бұрын
你的祖家台湾,英文果然也是博大精深呀!
@user-00dog2 жыл бұрын
FREE HONG KONG. FREE UIGHUR. SAVE MYANMAR .. FREE HONG KONG. FREE UIGHUR. SAVE MYANMAR ..
@shawnmay42592 жыл бұрын
英国人的消极情绪让这节目表现得太明显了。
@scottchien20342 жыл бұрын
The host was very, very unfriendly to Taiwan, and often interrupted the interviewee's discussion. Should a large nuclear power attack a small non-nuclear country, the small country should surrender? Then Ukraine has no nuclear weapons, should Ukraine surrender to Russia? The host said that China has an advantage in nuclear weapons, and the interviewee said that Taiwan also has an advantage in high-end chips. The host said that Taiwan intends to use high-end chips to threaten the world? The host obviously wanted to lead the interview to a conclusion: Taiwan is in an extremely dangerous situation, Taiwan is not recognized by the international community, and the world must avoid high-end chips being controlled by Taiwan, lest a war in the Taiwan Strait will affect the world economy in the future. And the host also Question whether Taiwan, like Ukraine, has the determination to stand up to defend its homeland and democratic system. 這個主持人對台灣非常非常不友善, 也常打斷受訪者的論述. 難道擁核大國攻擊無核小國, 小國就應該投降嗎? 那烏克蘭也沒有核武, 烏克蘭也該對俄羅斯投降嗎? 主持人說中國有核武優勢, 受訪者說台灣在高端晶片也有優勢, 主持人就說台灣打算用高端晶片要脅全世界? 這個主持人很明顯想將這個訪問引導至一種結論: 台灣處境極端危險, 台灣不被國際社會承認, 世界要避免高端晶片被台灣掌握, 以免將來台海戰爭, 世界經濟會受影響. 而且主持人也質疑台灣是否像烏克蘭, 有挺身保衛家園與民主制度的決心.
@hung po 我只覺得他沒有被充分授權回答這些問題,或是台灣政府外交體系沒有在內部處理好這些論述,導致他只能採取這種華人式的太極高招,但其實在西方媒體上玩這套只會為自己和我們的國際形象大扣分。寧可直說自己在某方面不能講太明,也不該這樣和主持人捉迷藏考驗對方忍耐限度。蔡英文被採訪問尖銳問題的時候回應就很好,不會這樣扯東扯西。 例如主持人問台灣人民有沒有面對戰爭的準備,結果回答我們確實面對危險、我們必須要做這個、我們必須要小心那個...其實就回答有就好啦,或是「有,但還不夠,需要國際怎樣幫忙...」明明沒有很敏感的東西