As ludicrous as the interwar designs can be, you got to love the period for all the inventiveness and creativity.
@someonebald20223 жыл бұрын
I was thinking something similar. Creative, but utterly useless most of the time! However, when they DO get it right they get it RIGHT (De Havilland Mosquito)!
@Robwantsacurry3 жыл бұрын
The pace of change was mind boggling, we went from wooden stringbags to the DC3 in 20 years.
@steffenrosmus91773 жыл бұрын
@@Robwantsacurry and to the Junkers Ju 52 in only 10 years.
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
@@steffenrosmus9177 But somehow the Ju 52/3m (1932) was just an imitation of already successful planes, the Fokker Trimotor (1924), and the Ford Trimotor (1926) *. . .*
@littlefluffybushbaby72563 жыл бұрын
Drugs were legal back then. Just saying. :)
@JK-rv9tp3 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. As a 65 year old who was buying aviation magazines with my allowance and sofa cushion money as far back as 1967, there are WAY too many airplanes out there I've never heard of.
@whisthpo3 жыл бұрын
Ditto JK !
@hogey743 жыл бұрын
Hey I am 47, similarly enthusiastic and I've been all over the internet like a rash. I haven't heard of this thing either! And it looks surprisingly "right" too.
@mongoose41173 жыл бұрын
I've been an aviation fanatic, my whole life. I'm amazed at how many airplanes I've never heard of. I love KZbin.
@IntrospectorGeneral3 жыл бұрын
I think that I first saw the Inflexible in The Aeroplane around 1980 but wouldn't swear to it. The article series also covered the Beardmore Inverness metal monoplane flying boat of the mid-1920s, another Beardmore-built prototype of a design licenced from Rohrbach (Ro IV). Although sharing many design features with the Inflexible it has one feature possibly unique in aviation - a retractable mast and sails to assist manouevering on the water.
@divarachelenvy3 жыл бұрын
gotta love those sofa finds, hehehe.
@karlk68602 жыл бұрын
I was a pilot for 15 years, my Dad was and aircraft engineer for Belanca and this is still another aircraft I didnt know ever existed! The old saying "the more you know truly the less you know" certainly holds true!
@beshkodiak3 жыл бұрын
How interesting! I own a 1957 Beardmore taxicab. All constructed of aircraft materials: aluminum, ash, and fiberglass on a steel chassis.
@gustavmeyrink_2.03 жыл бұрын
0:38 Not well known but Zeppelin the company still exists. It is now known as ZF (Zahnradfabrik Friedrichshafen) and it the world's second largest automotive supplier mostly famous for their gearboxes. Almost uniquely it is owned by a non-profit charitable foundation administered by the city council of Friedrichshafen. All profits go to good causes like meal-on-wheels, care homes etc. The reason I said 'almost uniquely' is that Bosch, the world's largest automotive supplier, is also owned by a non-profit charitable foundation and their profits equally go to good causes.
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH does still exist: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luftschiffbau_Zeppelin ZF Friedrichshafen was founded by Luftschiffbau Zeppelin: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_Friedrichshafen#Geschichte And there is Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik (ZLT), too, another daughter of Luftschiffbau Zeppelin: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeppelin_Luftschifftechnik ZLT is still constructing Zeppelins, today the Zeppelin NT *. . .*
@bentilbury20023 жыл бұрын
@Håkan BergvallYou need help.
@gustavmeyrink_2.03 жыл бұрын
@Håkan Bergvall So ZF has been virtue signalling for over 110 years? You think there is something wrong with funding universities, hospitals, youth clubs or care homes? Are you sick in the head?
@gustavmeyrink_2.03 жыл бұрын
@@letoubib21 all owned by the same foundation.
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
@@gustavmeyrink_2.0 I didn't deny that *. . .*
@Gavs_rc_hobbies3 жыл бұрын
Last year a guy came to my local model aircraft club for a scale event and he had scratch built one of these. It was impressive to watch fly through the air.
@Alan-hb8pd2 жыл бұрын
I love the early behemoths of the sky, so outlandish and fun
@hertzair11863 жыл бұрын
Well done Rex…I’m an armchair aviation historian but have not heard of this unique aircraft…
@rooseveltbrentwood96543 жыл бұрын
right? This is Ed Nash territory lol
@lancerevell59793 жыл бұрын
I've been an aviation buff most of my 64 years, but this one is new to me too. Good video!
@michaelmcdaid4332 жыл бұрын
Interestingly I live in one of the tenement buildings built by Beardmore to house his workers in Clydebank and never knew that the company had made aircraft as well as ships until I found your videos.
@charliescott77643 жыл бұрын
Beardmore's were just down the road from where I live. They also built airships and many fine warships. Excellent video thanks.
@xzqzq3 жыл бұрын
Looks like an excellent design for a giant scale RC .
@Packless13 жыл бұрын
...i know about this plane from a report in a model-plane-magazine... ...and it's HUGE - even when scaled-down... (~3m span, if i remember correct)
@xzqzq3 жыл бұрын
@@Packless1 I like the look of the interwar aircraft...
@mechanicman86873 жыл бұрын
I’m an old Waukesha mechanic and I love all old engines!!
@dixieboy56893 жыл бұрын
I lived in Waukesha in the late 60's and early 70's. Loved it then. Went to Randall Elementary School. I remember Pauls Butter Burger cafe downtown. Dutchland Dairy had good food too. The Avalon was all style back then.
@lakrids-pibe3 жыл бұрын
Hello from Denmark. I had no idea there was ever build airplanes in Copenhagen. I did know about the Ford assembly plant in Sydhavnen, Copenhagen where they made trucks from 1924 to 1966. The parts came by ship in big wooden boxes, and the empty boxes was a popular building material for D-I-Y types, making little houses in their allotment gardens. Quite a few evolved into permanent residents.
@GasoliniASMR3 жыл бұрын
Great video as usual. I love hearing about the unusual designs from this period.
@SKILLED5213 жыл бұрын
Another forgotten beauty. This is perhaps the only trimotor I find interesting. Your videos are always I treat. Thanks.
@frosch904533 жыл бұрын
Your channel is criminally underrated, hope it'll take off (sorry) in the new year.
@DraftySatyr3 жыл бұрын
Yet he already has a healthy 11.6k subscribers
@markdavis24753 жыл бұрын
Brilliant episode thanks 😃 Never heard about this aircraft before. Anything that can look this impressive now must have been mind blowing in the 20's!
@faerieSAALE3 жыл бұрын
HOW WOULD YOU KNOW ( about anything ) UNTIL YOU HAVE TRIED IT AT LEAST ONCE! Very interesting aircraft history tidbit! Thanks!
@klintwyont32713 жыл бұрын
Awesome!-not everyday you see a pretty girl interested in aircraft! Nice
@snarkymatt5853 жыл бұрын
@@klintwyont3271 wat wat wat! Did you just assume Lindsey's gender? 😂
@brandonobaza86103 жыл бұрын
@@klintwyont3271 If that pfp is her real face, I'm an actual German soldier watching you.
@unclenogbad15093 жыл бұрын
Big thanks for this vid. I'm only a part-time aviation nut, but do like finding out about these 'sideline' projects - unjustly forgotten in my opinion, especially when, as you mention, they show a leap in design ideas and a proof of concept that paved the way for more familiar developments (ie, the ones we've all heard of). Keep up the good work.
@rockyBalboa66993 жыл бұрын
You can't name an aircraft Inflexible and expect people to accept it. Also a lot of these aircrafts show a transition from aircraft designs from the boring Bi and tri planes in WWI to large, sturdy aircrafts before the start of WWII. A Great video with information i have never seen before.
@p40f203 жыл бұрын
I find your video's to be very well presented and researched. Head and shoulders above any other presenter on KZbin that makes these types of video's. Keep them coming!!!!
@Ash007YT3 жыл бұрын
Happy New Year Rex, Here's to 50k!
@RexsHangar3 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate! And a Happy New Year to you as well!
@jangelbrich70563 жыл бұрын
Nice rare diamond of "early" aviation. It has some features similar to the Swiss Pilatus PC-6 Porter, with its "square-ish" design
@robgraham56973 жыл бұрын
Loving all the obscure but interesting aircraft you are brining to light. Thanks and a Happy New Year.
@HeadPack3 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. It contains two planes perhaps worth separate videos, the Zeppelin E420 and that sleek looking (aerobatic?) plane they placed in front of the Inflexible at 3:23 in the video. That little plane looks very advanced for its time, as does the Zeppelin.
@connclark21543 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on the Beardmore BeRo.2 Inverness flying boat? It was related to the inflexible and had the weird distinction of being fitted with a retractable mast and sails. The sails were added incase of a forced landing at sea due to engine failure or running out of fuel.
@connclark21543 жыл бұрын
@@IntrospectorGeneral Umm... that link goes to the Beardmore Inflexible
@IntrospectorGeneral3 жыл бұрын
@@connclark2154 Apologies - that was next on the playlist. This one should do it. kzbin.info/www/bejne/m4m0kn56qJuCi9U
@littlefluffybushbaby72563 жыл бұрын
That sounds brilliant. I guess if they got the engines going again they could use them to blow into the sails. I wonder if they had plans for a submersible version. Thunderbirds are go!
@edwardfletcher77903 жыл бұрын
I'm always amazed at some of the oddities you dig up ! 👍
@kahumike3 жыл бұрын
I recall reading an article on this many years ago in an English aviation magazine, but I can't recall which one it was nor the date. A fascinating snippet into the experimentation that was done into what was still a comparatively new and unknown realm.
@MrRandomcommentguy3 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love the minimalist industrial design of the 1920's
@olliefoxx71653 жыл бұрын
What a great time for aeronautical engineers. Innovation everywhere, technology developing so rapidly anything seemed possible.
@13stalag133 жыл бұрын
I'm a BIG fan of early aviation, but had never heard of this aircraft. Thank you from a new subscriber.
@tamjacobite47583 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation about a plane I had never heard of and seemed to be at the cutting edge in its time. Thank you for posting
@icarusairways61393 жыл бұрын
Found some old magazine plans for a Rhorback Roland 1. Redrew them and scratch built about a 22" balsa model. Cool airplane.
@elliotdryden75603 жыл бұрын
I like the bit at 7:15 or so about the aircraft feeling "a bit sluggish". Compared to what I would ask? No doubt the follow-on efforts would be the Beardmore "Unfathomable" and "Improbable" envisaged as executive transports....
@DraftySatyr3 жыл бұрын
Culminating in the "Irascible"
@davidb65763 жыл бұрын
Inconceivable!
@stephenarbon22273 жыл бұрын
@@davidb6576 and finishing up with the 'incognito' spy plane
@BeasBotBonanza2 жыл бұрын
Lovely! Have you ever done a video on the PBY catalina? There is plenty out there about its use during the war but id love to learn more about its development and flying boats in general
@colinashby37753 жыл бұрын
Can’t get over the size of those wheels
@danielcruz83473 жыл бұрын
Great vaudevillian behemoth..it's beautiful..Thank you for new year day 2022 presentation.peace too all
@FirstDagger3 жыл бұрын
Now this is really obscure and surprisingly innovative.
@oxcart41723 жыл бұрын
Another gem of a video! Keep up the great work! Oh, and happy new year!
@bigcheeezzz71353 жыл бұрын
Love the sound of the radial engine in the intro! 👍👍👍
@SoloRenegade3 жыл бұрын
don't suppose anyone knows what the little single engine plane under it at 3:20 is? edit: found it, DH.71 Tiger Moth
@mikelarin80373 жыл бұрын
Also at 8:30 theres a Glenny & Henderson HSF.2 Gadfly
@Katy_Jones3 жыл бұрын
I've heard of Beardmore as a builder but never knew they built anything like this. Nice find. I'm taking a wild guess at the pilot getting a serius workout with those control surfaces.
@pseudonym95993 жыл бұрын
Something seems ironic about so large of a plane with such massive wings being called 'inflexible'.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman3 жыл бұрын
I was wondering WHERE the name _"Inflexible"_ came from.
@littlefluffybushbaby72563 жыл бұрын
Maybe the wings were so large that the resistance to banking made it fly in a straight line... inflexibly. :) Still sounds like a Dreadnaught-era battleship to me.
@victoriacyunczyk2 жыл бұрын
The Royal Navy outdid them with HMS Invincible.
@matthewfergusons43182 жыл бұрын
I can imagine if I want massive transport aircraft and if I was Atlantis by military aircraft they have flexible would be maybe high on my list for transport planes a size the American gooney birds
@101jir2 жыл бұрын
I do find it funny how between this and the HMS Inflexible,the British seemed to use the word as a positive thing XD
@zxbzxbzxb13 жыл бұрын
Great video! The construction and transport problems mirror those of the building of the Kennedy Giant 10 years previous, but this aircraft was at least able to fly. Those wheels are magnificent 😎
@bashirmuhammad81813 жыл бұрын
I have just stumble on your page.It is excellent. Great video content and narration. The research is impeccable. Well done!
@sailordude20942 ай бұрын
Pre-Spruce Goose. Thanks for the aviation history!
@bernardfitzgerald61173 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your work.It is terrific to see the WWW being used to add to knowledge and appreciation of history .
@joshuaharlow42412 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! As always, I would not have known of this aircraft!
@j.dmetalhead75172 жыл бұрын
Informative and entertaining. Well done Rex old boy. Keep up the good work, pip pip and toodle loo 😁
@peterszar3 жыл бұрын
I only started watching your videos a few months ago. I am quite impressed with your channel and your choice of subjects, covering some unusual aircraft as well as popular designs. I'm surprised by all the drag causing fittings, fasteners, and skin overlapping on the wings.
@oliversmith92003 жыл бұрын
The most complete review of the Beardmore Inflexible presently on You Tube!
@WarblesOnALot3 жыл бұрын
G'day, Twice in the past 45 years Aeroplane magazine (England) has run feature Articles on this Beastie. Therefore, about the only snippet herein of which I was unaware was that Kurt Tank was involved in the design. Very well done though, thanks for the upload. Have a good one... Stay safe. :-p Ciao !
@conservativemike37683 жыл бұрын
How charmingly primitive… and the single tires look to be 2 tons each!
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
Guess those tyres couldn't be bought right off the peg *. . . ;-)*
@garrymartin64743 жыл бұрын
I liked the bird house on the starboard side next to the cockpit.
@tonyheffernan62353 жыл бұрын
Fascinating, a great insight in to an Aircraft i never knew existed.
@stevegabbert96263 жыл бұрын
At 3:18 Do you know what that little plane in front of it was? It reminds me of the aerobatic planes they have now.
@johnjephcote76363 жыл бұрын
A wheel from an Armstrong Whitworth Ensign, another monster pre-WWII (just) airliner also found its way into the Science Museum. Also, hardly an aircraft...but Beardmores also built the gantries and Railplane for Geo. Bennie at Milngavie (a short section above the railway for the airscrew-pusher suspended monorail demonstartion).
@robertmatch65503 жыл бұрын
Interesting, apparently well researched and well told. Thank you.
@portnuefflyer3 жыл бұрын
The size of the tires! The wing was cable braced for flight loads, like a big ultralight, so I guess the struts were for static loads.
@handy3353 жыл бұрын
An excellent well done posting. Thank you!
@UniversalChallenge44543 жыл бұрын
happy new year and I like to see more obscure aircraft and maybe aviation history here is an aircraft you have not heard off Focke-Wulf Triebflügel
@DraftySatyr3 жыл бұрын
Just looked at that on Wiki. Lord, the Nazis were getting desperate towards the end!
@zxbzxbzxb13 жыл бұрын
@@DraftySatyr The Heinkel Lerche is a similar sort of aircraft, again never made. The Ba-349 Natter is probably the maddest aircraft that they did build and test
@UniversalChallenge44543 жыл бұрын
@@DraftySatyr it is not a nazi plane
@UniversalChallenge44543 жыл бұрын
@@zxbzxbzxb1 Not some ideas were crazier still focke-wulf triebflügel, Heinkel Wespe and Heinkel Lerche are just 3 of them
@clarencehopkins78323 жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff bro
@jehoiakimelidoronila54502 жыл бұрын
Can somebody tell me what that little raceplane is at the bottom at 3:17??? That image made me think that the inflexible can carry two, three, or five of those. . .
@andro7137Ай бұрын
Excellent record - thank you. I knew of it, but details are hard to find.
@davidjones3323 жыл бұрын
It is worth recording that very similar, but rather smaller Rohrbach Roland aircraft were operated by Lufthansa between 1926 and 1936. They had about eighteen, though not at all at the same time, and they operated much of the airline's European network very successfully, though at cruising speeds only around 100 mph.
@RocketmanS2K3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rex, great video! Any idea what that sexy little monoplane is in the foreground at 5:05?
@stevelovering97742 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rex fascinating.
@abundantYOUniverse3 жыл бұрын
I always wondered about this airplane, thanks!
@jasonz77883 жыл бұрын
Great work Sir thank you
@amyhogarten50382 жыл бұрын
I love this channel ‼️
@michaelely21612 жыл бұрын
Great video - but what is the little sport plane at 3:20?
@chocolatte61573 жыл бұрын
I like the design. Just kind of cool to see an aircraft that large, monoplane, all metal and innovative features. 👍 I would not want to dive bomb in it though.
@gaius_enceladus3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! I had never heard of this aircraft!
@victoryfirst28783 жыл бұрын
Since the wheels were 2.2 meters in size, how where they made to keep down the weight. Thanks VF
@bmcg52963 жыл бұрын
It’s like a massive modern glider in it’s design and shape. Large wings are monstrous.
@johnjephcote76363 жыл бұрын
Beardmores also built the engines for the R101 airship. In order to avoid the danger of petrol, they converted the heavier, but diesel -fuelled engines used by the Canadian railways.
@drstevenrey2 жыл бұрын
Oh how I would have loved to watch and listen as a German tries to pronounce Beardmore. Note, I am Canadian, grew up with French and English, then went to school in Switzerland, German, and Swissgerman (considering it to be an independent language as Germans do not understand it) and now living in the UK. Germans are, like English speakers, totally mono lingual.
@Lord.Kiltridge3 жыл бұрын
May I suggest a video on the Bristol Beaufort?
@DumbledoreMcCracken3 жыл бұрын
I would suppose the wing tips were designed to lower control forces, not control flutter. Flutter is controlled by adding balance weights in front of the aileron hinges. While you could do that at the tips, this would cause torsional loads that would not be ideal in countering the flutter throughout the entire aileron. Correct me if i am wrong.
@michaelwright29866 ай бұрын
Where did they get the name from? I suppose "Inflexible" because, being all metal, it was supposed not to bend; but it still sounds like a battleship. (Oh, I just looked it up: last _Inflexible_ was a battle cruiser, slightly larger and heavier even than this.) You've also got to ask just how much design was involved. The recipe seems to have been, "Take the most basic design possible, and scale it up." Still, the stress calculations must have been fun.
@thisisnumber03 жыл бұрын
Another version was built in rubber, known as the Flexible. Not a lot of people know this... 🤪
@letoubib213 жыл бұрын
And one made of glass became the _Breakable_ *. . . ;-)*
@balham4563 жыл бұрын
The aircraft at 01:00 looks way ahead of its time.
@tiss00063 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! I know you're probably trying to keep your videos in the 9-12 minute range for the algorithm, but is there any chance you'd make longer, more in depth videos occasionally? I'd love to watch one of your videos while building kit model aircraft, but they are so short!
@geoffreywilliams6633 жыл бұрын
what's the small monoplane in front at 3:38 in the video ?
@bobgibb27813 жыл бұрын
Now I remember ! My late Father , an Aircraft Inspector , showed me a picture of this thing when I was a child and told me that it was made of flattened out biscuit tins !
@clavo33523 жыл бұрын
Well done video!
@Ensign_Cthulhu3 жыл бұрын
Question, what are the small single-seaters parked in front in some photos?
@Rickinsf3 жыл бұрын
that's a cool looking little plane 3:25, what is it?
@MiKeMiDNiTe-773 жыл бұрын
I like this plane nice look to it and had features to be used in future aircraft.
@ThomasKent13463 жыл бұрын
"...and had features to be used in future aircraft." Features like the open cockpit?
@nano-soaring-dashb25522 жыл бұрын
So, gathering what I can from this video, the ‘Inflexible’ lived up to it’s name on the ground as well as the air?
@littlefluffybushbaby72563 жыл бұрын
The name alone is a hint. They say (who ever 'they' are) that if it looks right it will fly right. I'd extend that law to "if it sounds right it will probably look right". This one just sounds and looks wrong. Inflexible is the name you'd give to a pre-Dreadnaught battle cruiser that hit a mine and sank in the Dardanelles along with HMS Flatulence. What surprises me is that it's not a Blackburn design. They specialized in these kind of monstrosities. Seriously. They did.
@jakeyt86872 жыл бұрын
Can u make a video about the handley page v1500.
@terryblackman62173 жыл бұрын
This aircraft would make a good subject for radio control model flying.
@keithstevens56143 жыл бұрын
The concept seems to have involved getting a giant glider sluggishly up to a certain altitude under its own power and then let it glide along with a slight push back from its engines.
@charlesmoss81193 жыл бұрын
I just love the name - it sort of feels like they were naming a Dreadnought
@bradleyjanes29493 жыл бұрын
Very interesting rex 🇺🇸👊
@bernardwills96743 жыл бұрын
I once read of this aircraft that while it surprised observers by actually flying it had no further useful properties.
@jamesburns22323 жыл бұрын
All my old furniture goes back to Sears and Rohrbach, the 6th.