Beast mode Jannik Sinner defeats good/great mode Fritz. And wins his first ATP Finals in Turin 2024.

Рет қаралды 580

Inter Interi tennis

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 59

@nicolaswhitehouse3894 Ай бұрын

Inter interi you are probably one of the most accurate predictors here.

@Hiep156 Ай бұрын

If there is one thing that Inter does not get credit for, or not mentioned much, it is the fact that nobody summarizes a tennis match with statistics better than him, and we have to be grateful for his passion:).

@michael8597 Ай бұрын

@@Hiep156 That is what separates Interi from other tennis analysts; the importance shown to match stats.

@nicolaswhitehouse3894 Ай бұрын

For me, Zverev was playing good in this ATP final, but he can’t lose that match against Fritz in the semi-finals, in my opinion. This loss was unacceptable by his standards.

@sanjidaakhteranonnya Ай бұрын

Sinner has potential to win calendar slam. In my opinion, he is the greatest tennis player of all time...!!!

@Logan00710 Ай бұрын

Noo way, is to soon yet

@issahatake90 Ай бұрын

In my opinion, Alcaraz is a strong candidate when it comes to versatility on all surfaces. However, he currently lacks the consistency needed to win all Grand Slam titles in a single year. Nevertheless, I am confident that he will get his chances and might one day make history.

@michael8597 Ай бұрын

Interi - I never equated him with Berdych; I only said that he plays such a style - which is ofcourse true - but is a much better version. So I already gave him due credit. Berdych is not an ordinary player and ranked as high as 4 in a brutal era comprising Novak, Nadal, Federer, Murray, Wawarinka, Del Potro and Tsonga. I also clearly said that the prospect of an upset was possible, but not probable. We knew how commentators and analysts completely wrote off Meddy's chances against Alcaraz at US open 2023; Meddy's chances against Sinner at Wimbledon 2024 and even Novak's chances against Alcaraz at Olympics 2024, and then had to cut a very sorry face with outcomes being different. If you go and play against Sinner with a defeatist mindset like Meddy or Ruud, it will never work. Fritz had to clock around 75% first serve percentage to have a chance, but he couldn't manage it and his weak second serve got exposed to Sinner's advantage.

@RaviKumar-tu6ls Ай бұрын

Fritz clocked 75% first serves actually which was also the most first serves he has made in this tournament .

@arvinds4961 Ай бұрын

Sinner's 2nd serve is so good a bit like federer in his best days so precise and accurate very much better than Zverev or fritz's 2nd serve .

@sanjidaakhteranonnya Ай бұрын

Great vdo & great match analysis inter, keep it up !!!

@margaritamuller2497 Ай бұрын

Sinner is the best 🎉🎉🎉

@travisbickle5279 Ай бұрын

amazing year from sinner. Alcaraz is the new björn borg clay grass court specialist and sinner the new hardcourt specialist

@vindukur100 Ай бұрын

Jannik will win atleast 5 wimbledon. His game is perfect for grass Only health can derail him from all time greatness. Otherwise he has all the ingredients

@alfredghofari3614 Ай бұрын

you are %100 right

@issahatake90 Ай бұрын

I see some points differently. You emphasize that Sinner in 2024 is not the same player he was in 2023, which I only partly agree with. From a purely tennis perspective, I believe Sinner has not fundamentally changed - technically and in terms of his game, he was already at a top level from Wimbledon 2023 onwards. The key difference lies more in the mental aspect, where he has significantly matured. This mental growth has helped him win matches in crucial moments that he might have lost previously. On hard courts, I see a 50/50 duel between him and Djokovic in 2023. Djokovic proved in 2023 that he is almost unbeatable on this surface, but with a mentally stronger Sinner in 2024, it would be a showdown on equal terms. On clay and grass, however, Djokovic in 2023 remains clearly superior. His versatility and experience on these surfaces - especially his dominant clay-court game and tactical precision on grass - give him a significant advantage over Sinner, who still shows weaknesses on these surfaces. In the overall picture, Djokovic in 2023 is the better tennis player. He was able to dominate on all surfaces, whereas Sinner’s success in 2024 primarily comes from hard courts. Djokovic in 2023 had not only a top technical level but also impressive mental strength, which made him nearly unbeatable in the decisive moments of matches. It’s also clear that Djokovic in 2024 is not the same player as he was in 2023. His season planning and form curve suggest he has specifically focused on the Olympic Games. One gets the impression that Djokovic would have been willing to sacrifice all other titles in 2024 if it meant winning the gold medal at the Olympics. This shows how, with age, he has reassessed his priorities. Conclusion: Even though Sinner in 2023 was not mentally the same player as he is in 2024, Djokovic in 2024 is also definitely not the same player he was in 2023. Therefore, Djokovic in 2023 remains the overall more complete tennis player. Additionally, I would like to mention that, in my opinion, Alcaraz has a higher level than Sinner, particularly on clay and grass, especially on grass. His movement, versatility, and ability to adapt to different surfaces give him an edge on these surfaces. However, I see Sinner at a higher level than Alcaraz on hard courts, where his aggressive baseline game, improved serve, and consistency make him a more complete player than Alcaraz in this specific context.

@sanjay-ul8lch Ай бұрын

Sinner has the best BH not zverev and Carlos having the highest ceiling has to be a wrong statement you keep repeating . By the way Sinner has excellent variety, slice and his drop shots are deadly even has the best drop shot winning percentage on tour this year .

@nicolaswhitehouse3894 Ай бұрын

I don’t think Djokovic will be a threat to Sinner, precisely because of what you said with Fritz : what actually Djokovic does better than Sinner currently ? The response is almost nothing. There is nothing right now that Djokovic does better than Sinner. Maybe Djokovic can still be a threat to Carlos, because they are actually things that he does better than Carlos. But not against Sinner.

@yinhoukhor7109 Ай бұрын

I'd really love to see this 2024 version of Jannik versus the Fantastic Four of the last decade (on hardcourts). It'd be super interesting. I'd say only Novak 2015 and 2019 is outright slightly better but against the rest, it's as great a contest as ever.

@timytidy60 Ай бұрын

Novak beats him in 2 sets. Do not exaggerate Sinner. Except Alcaraz he has no real oppoment. While the big three were playing, they had to beat Del Potro, Nalbandian, Roddick, Safin, Wawrinka, Murray, Ferrer, and so on. All these guys are great player, emotionally strong. Beating Fritz is not the same thing.

@vindukur100 Ай бұрын

bs This Sinner is better than anyone and equals to roger at his peak

@sanjay-ul8lch Ай бұрын

@@timytidy60 Fritz beat the best version of zverev serving over 80% he also beat medvedev he beat zverev for 4th time in a row reached us open finals your love for novak belittles jannik beyond imagination . Who did djokovic beat since 2018 the lost gen .He was playing paul, karatsev,pouilee, Nishikori , RBA in grand slam semis .

@issahatake90 Ай бұрын

@@sanjay-ul8lchWhom did Federer defeat in the semifinals between 2004 and 2007, including Sébastien Grosjean, Tim Henman, Nicolas Kiefer, Jonas Björkman, and Richard Gasquet🤔

@sharfinahmed4389 Ай бұрын

Good Vdo inter, i think sinner is the greatest player of this generation. Alcaraz is mediocre player, he doesn’t match the aura of sinner !!!

@sanjay-ul8lch Ай бұрын

You are saying Alcaraz with his inconsistent game weaker serve, weaker bh, weaker than sinner from baseline, lesser returns than sinner even drop shots at the current moment Sinner holds the edge is more complete than Sinner . You keep saying he has highest ceiling another wrong info the guy couldn't take a set off post surgery djokovic in djokovic's worst surface despite playing his best .

@Fraudkovic Ай бұрын

Alcaraz 3- sinner 0

@masteryoda1821 Ай бұрын

Wow, this time you totaly surprised me. i also think beast mode alcaraz beats beast mode sinner and i also think sinner is like djokovic. sinner improves so fast its insane. alcaraz on the other hand i dont even know if he still plays tennis with 27. he dominates and wins the important games because he is motivated. but in games against weaker opponents. he never plays 100 percent against most opponents and very very often he is behind and than all of a sudden plays crazy good tennis. its always the same even within the sets and points. he realy struggled to uphold his motivation. thats an issue and i wouldnt be surprised if he quits his career early

@travisbickle5279 Ай бұрын

DJOKOVIC WILL win next year 2 grandslams if he stays injury free AND if he dont play the first semifinal daysession australian open match. i saw in some matches from sinner that his fittness is not to good in extreme long matches. I think djokovic fitness will be really good in australia and i still think that djokovic fitness is still little bit better then sinner even in this high age. I saw that in that six slam nonsense tournament. Novak won in the third set most of the long rallys, but he lose in the end because of some unforced errors. AGAIN if djokovic plays sinner in that fast australian open night session condition he will win that match. BUT SINNER IS THE MEN TO BEAT on hardcourts

@honeynut4586 Ай бұрын

At this point Djokovic can lose before the semifinals

@dusanrandjelovic9420 Ай бұрын

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

@michael8597 Ай бұрын

Don't forget that Sinner has lost to Alcaraz thrice this year, twice on hard court, and has never beaten him. So it is still possible to beat him if you play with excellence, consistency and variety. At Shanghai, Novak was the better player in the first set and was 5-4, 0-30 on Sinner's serve but then made fatal unforced errors to gift it to Sinner. If he had won that first set, you never know how the match would have turned out ??

@honeynut4586 Ай бұрын

Thats the problem Sinner is very clutch, whenever he loses a point on serve he almost always wins the next point and usually in 1-2 shots

@vanamalik6669 Ай бұрын

All said and done, despite liking him as a budding youngster a year ago, I am not able to enjoy his awesome results. Why ? The ATP Sinner drug test saga. Gross and very very perplexing.

@mariepelletier3020 Ай бұрын

Sinner is the new Djokovic. He plays like him, he plays percentages and where he differs from Djokovic is that he hits harder and perhaps even faster. He's not as creative as Alcaraz--Alcaraz is beautiful to watch--but right now he's better than Carlos. Next year may be different but today it's Sinner.

@timytidy60 Ай бұрын

i dont compare Sinner with big three. They all beat this Sinner. These generations do not have that extra skill and emotional power. If you can crack Sinner and get inside his mind, you can slowly take the control of the match. You can not beat him with hard power, you need to distort his mind. This is what Novak would do. who has mental skill to distort Sinner's mind. Nobody. Only Medvedev at his best or Novak at his best.

@sanjay-ul8lch Ай бұрын

Sinner has defeated medvedev for 8th time in a row on hard courts he ahs defeated djokovic 4 out of last 5 meetings if you include riyad it is 5 out of last 6 . sinner is the only player in history of tennis not to lose any match in straight sets or in 4 sets in best of 5 in a year which shows how consistent and tough he is to beat .

@RaviKumar-tu6ls Ай бұрын

The big 3 is not unbeatable god they are human beings, safin,wawrinka,cilic,nishikori,del potro, murray. tsonga, soderling all have showed the big 3 can be beaten the thing that sets them apart is the consistency which only sinner is able to maintain not alcaraz or the lost ninety gen nor berdych, soderling etc . A guy like thiem who is much inferior to sinner has beaten djokovic 5 out of last 7 times and has great record against big 3 but he is super consistent which is why sinner is very special after the big 3 .

@Bojanthekid Ай бұрын

Inter i missed the final same as the us open Final Fritz is not a tough competator in a big final not yet maybe in 2 Years

@brendajohnson5525 Ай бұрын

I don't understand why the rest of the tour has not figured out how to play Sinner other than Alcaraz. If they had he may not have been no 1. Can no one else defeat him out of his comfort zone which is baseline and hard courts? This must change in 2025 or we are in for some pretty boring tennis.

@arvinds4961 Ай бұрын

Struff, dimitrov, Tallon, berettini, vavasorri,hubi, marozsan all used variety drop shots, slice etc tried their best to disrupt his game but didn't succeed .Sinner has such a big serve great returns cleanest ball striking also uses drop shots, lobs, smash etc and slides on hard court crazily how is that boring .

@nicolaswhitehouse3894 Ай бұрын

Sinner isn’t a new berdych as sinner moves much much better mover than Berdych. And in modern tennis, mouvement is almost everything.

@michaeljoseph1341 Ай бұрын

Honesty personified inter please answer when it comes to Federer you have been over critical calling him santa cluase multiple times but when it comes to Alcaraz or Nadal you are always soft . Especially Alcaraz now you potray him as an unbeatable god how is this honesty . Is there a bigger santa cluase than Alcaraz if Federer is santa clause what is Alcaraz .

@dusandeletic2092 Ай бұрын

Sinner is a good player but he is far away from big 3 level. Due to the weak competition he is able to win so many titles this year. The fact he played final of US open and ATP final against Taylor Fritz indicate how weak competition we get this days. Taylor is limited players who 10-15 yers ago would have a hard time to broke in top 20 players. He is fortune to play in the era when big 3 retired and only competator is Alcaraz who is not impressive at the fast HC surface. This is a dark age for tennis.

@arvinds4961 Ай бұрын

So you mean baghdatis, philipousis,gonzalez,Hewitt,roddick who federer dominated in his prime is better than sinner and alcaraz or Medvedev, Berrettini, ruud, Zverev, Kygrios etc who djokovic dominated to win slams since 2018 is better than sinner and alcaraz . Diimitrov maybe the bigegst raw talent of nineties gen didn't even make a slam final , biggest raw talent of eighties other than the big 4 is Monfils is yet to win a big title or make grand slam final . So you mean the lost gen is better than sinner and alcaraz . Tipsaraevic, Fish, almagro were in the top ten in 2011 definitely Fritz is not inferior to them Tipsarevic, fish, almagro have zero big titles. Almagro and Tipsarevic haven't even reached a masters 1000 final .

@michael8597 Ай бұрын

It is no guarantee that Sinner's form will not desert him going forward, when it has happened to all players including Novak, Nadal and Federer ?? Don't also forget that there is dark cloud hovering over him with WADA'S appeal and the ban decision can come any time. We never know how Sinner will play after serving a one year ban ??

@Bojanthekid Ай бұрын

Inter i disagree berdych from 2010 would have won two Grand Slam this year sinners only competition is alcaraz and a 37 years old djokovic you cant compare berdych to sinner thats unfair to him but all credit to sinner this year

@travisbickle5279 Ай бұрын

berdych is not even In the near from sinner. PLEASE dont write like the federer fans( not you interi) where potrayin even nalbandian as a tennis giant

@Bojanthekid Ай бұрын

@@travisbickle5279 Berdych competion was prime rafa put 2010 rafa nowdays he wins 3 out of 4 slams put 2010 Federer nowdays sinner would lose in straight sets the competion nowdays is not as good as it was 10 years ago

@arvinds4961 Ай бұрын

@@Bojanthekid Just look at the players Berdych lost in 2010 evegeny Korolev in straight sets 2nd round of ao unseeded player ranked outside of top hundred and 1st round of us open to unseeded llodra in straight sets . He lost to multiple lower ranked players mallise, petzner,Berrer,Garcia lopez, Peter Luczak etc . Every single year he has been upset early on an avg in 2 slams . He has 1 masters 1000 in his entire career . Just because he played in big 3 era doesn't make him a world beater . Look at his 2011 grand slam he lost early 1st round of rg, 3rdd round of wimbledon. 2012 1st round lost in wimbledon, 4th round loss at rg. 2013 1ST ROUND OF RG, 4TH ROUND OF US OPEN . Name one year where he has made qtr finals of all slams and only lost to top 20 players .

@sanjay-ul8lch Ай бұрын

Have you played tennis there is nothing known as weak era this era is the hardest to be consistent anybody in the top hundred can beat the top ten which was not the case decade back as the players themself deminaur, medvedev, ruud, fritz all have confessed sinner has the highest ceiling and is the hardest opponent to face and this era is so physical and brutal. You need to have the whole package to win multiple slams in one year like sinner, alcaraz you think this is walk in the park a one dimensional player like berdych will never be able to do it i can guarantee you that . A super talented player like alcaraz is losing early cause the sport is so physical and brutal nowadays berdych will never win one slam this year let alone two he doesn't have returns, bh, elite defense speed, variety etc. Lehecka, machac and fritz are much more dangerous and complete than berdych

@RaviKumar-tu6ls Ай бұрын

You are way too delusional sinner will obliterate Berdych with absolute ease .