Terrence Howard: "This is The Best Kept SECRET in The ENTIRE WORLD!"

[@sarahfairchild399]

Considering the public education system was established to "create good workers not thinkers" this doesn't suprise me much. Am glad Terrance is talking about this.

[@princeekeson12]

Education = Indoctrination

[@atomatman3104]

NOTHING FAIR IN A CHILDS PLAY

[@junkman7901]

1 x 1 = 1. It’s not 1 apple x 1 apple it’s 1 apple 1 times This is basic math and why terry failed school, because he’s dumb

[@robby3467]

@@junkman7901 Yeah, what is this video about? It has to be some kind of April fools gag or something. I mean, otherwise it's total bs.

[@dionpaschini4536]

They hide the truth of everything why because someone long ago new what the human mind could accomplish if only the truth was available

[@danielo2704]

For the 1x1 problem, which I don't think is much of a problem if you approach it based on the fundamentals of multiplication. I mean correct me if I'm wrong, but I would say multiplication is the number of times the addition operation is meant to be carried out on a number based on the multiplier. In other words, a x b means add 'a' , 'b' number of times. For example: 2 x 3 = Add 2, 3 times = 2+2+2 = 6 4 x 2 = Add 4, 2 times = 4+4 = 8 But when it comes to the multiplier of 1, there is practically no addition operation carried out, because you are calling the number once, whereas addition requires at least two numbers to operate upon. Hence you have that number added to nothing, and that simply returns the number. The main point however is that the addition operator requires at least two non-zero numbers to effectively operate. For instance, in human biology, a baby only begins to form when there is a union between a sperm and an egg from a woman. However, the required "union" to begin forming a baby isn't possible with the absence of either element, because the "union" requires the presence of both elements last I checked. In a similar vain the mathematical operator of addition needs at least two numbers in between which it can operate. Hence, multiplication by 1 only presents one number before the addition operator and nothing on the other end. Hence nothing added to the first number returns that number unchanged. It's quite a crazy thing to try to explain, but not so much so as to ruin the foundations and principles of mathematics in my opinion. 《Edit》I think a helpful way of viewing the multiplier is to see it as a count of the number of times a number or an object is operated upon. For instance: 2x3 = sum(2, 2, 2) = 6, conversely 3x2 = sum(3, 3) = 6, and similarly 2x1 = sum(2) = 2, conversely 1x2 = sum(1, 1) = 2, hence 1x1 = sum(1) = 1 Look closely at the last three and decide if mathematically speaking 1x1=2. I personally don't see the possibility. furthermore, when dealing with objects: bx3 = sum(b, b, b) = 3b bx2 = sum(b, b) = 2b bx1 = sum(b) = 1b, or b for short. I hope I haven't complicated it with the last part, I just thought it might help illustrate it further. 《Edit 2》 On account of the interactions with comments I've gotten to learn a bit more and attempted to understand the position of those who agree with 1x1=1+1=2. I've also seen a few comments that attempt to use my illustration as justification for the proposition of 1x1=2, so I feel the need to make this edit while leaving the original comment unchanged in all fairness to replies already made. Some have said that my logic of: 2x3=Add 2, 3 times=2+2+2=6 should translate as well to 1x1=Add 1, 1 time=1+1=2 as Terrence would suggest. I tried to clarify that in the original comment, and as well in the first edit, but let me give it one more go. I hope I phrase my thoughts better this time. I think part of the confusion, especially when you multiply two of the same number is to assume that the multiplier is part of the additive process. In actuality it is only instructive about the count of the number being multiplied. So 2x3=2+2+2, if you count the number of 2s on the right side of the equation you count 3. But 3 in itself is not being added, meaning 2x3 is not 2+3+3. Similarly 3x4=3+3+3+3, and we count 3, 4 times on the right hand side. If we switch it up 4x3=4+4+4, we count 4, 3 times. Where I think the confusion may arise is when the numbers are the same, one may mistakenly think that the multiplier is offering more than the function of a count and think it is part of the addition. So 2x2=2+2, but keep in mind that the second 2 is just telling us the count. And similarly 4x4=4+4+4+4, the second 4 is just the count, even though coincidentally 4 is also the number being multiplied. Hence, 1x1=1, because the instruction is to return one INSTANCE of the first number, which is 1. Hence it doesn't follow for 1x1=1+1, because this returns two instances of 1, which is otherwise expressed as 1x2. If it is still confusing for you, then try the following according to my logic, and then afterwards attempt it with Terrence's logic: By my logic- 4x1=4 (here count/instance/multiplier is 1) 1x4=1+1+1+1 (here count/instance/multiplier is 4) By Terrence's logic since 1x1=1+1, hence it seems he suggests 4x1=4+1 I maintain that the laws of math and physics may be based on approximations and assumptions, but they are sufficiently adequate to refute the two mathematical arguments that Terrence highlights in his talks. If he seeks to uproot a system, then it means the alternative must surpass the first in logic, application and whatever areas that were found lacking. As for the other things, I'm no expert in them, and I think there may be some gems worth exploring. But as hopeful as I may be that something new and exciting be discovered, I maintain a healthy mix of curiosity and skepticism. Thanks

[@belathewhite6173]

Terrence Howard is an idiot, its brutally painfull. Hollywood actors should stay away from serious things. thanks for your clear explanation that should allow even the dumbest human to understand how it works.

[@sanderscupac7829]

So simple if you have an HONEST mind and not looking for self gradisement.

[@RM-jc1gr]

It's a statement.

[@jdude7650]

You sir, just may be more practically intelligent than this whole video. Thank you for your explanation.

[@SimiMode]

What Terrance might be trying to highlight, which you might have missed is the significance of the number 1. This is unlike other numbers in out universe. The significance of the number 0 and number 1. If 2*2 give 4, and everything times and added by itself give a surplus, why doesn't the number 1 leads to a surplus? Adding the egg + sperm is taking the argument to another direction. The key might be that humanity have not yet understood the significance of the number 1 besides the fact that we can it a prime number.

[@AlamgirBhangi]

Finding the 'hidden laws of the game' ebook should be your top priority, even if it's the last thing you do in life

[@JZ_Strings]

LOL

[@ThihaMinThantY8K3]

I just realize that there are actual people glazing this guy.......I have officially lost hope in humanity.

[@gucci888_]

Borlest is just wasting his time on bots. Pure ai ebook hahaha. My pooooooop is better than that book!

[@iseetrolledpeople]

Terry really inspires me. He inspires me to do yearly mental health exams and have a normal sleep pattern.

[@theodosios2615]

😂

[@fauziagaffar3958]

he is much further than you, that is why you are unable to understand him.

[@AntK-SE]

​@fauziagaffar3958 so what is 1×1? And so you really believe he remembers being in his mother's womb? And why did he lie about having a degree in chemical engineering? He even said so that he didn't understood it. Why did he lie about the amount of patents that he has?

[@judyhart7628]

​@@AntK-SEPatents pending, troll.

[@odiagam5755]

Oh boy ..

[@dnoordink]

"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"... and "It's not what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so" come to mind.

[@polaris7314]

A fatal truth indeed, thank you! Most people have no idea how terribly they misunderstand some of the key things in life.

[@Captain-Obvious1]

"A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" You just destroyed the entire video.

[@Ratko_Suzic]

Why most videos of this matter lately have orbs flying around in them..?

[@MynameisDUmass]

Fun fact: the more knowledge you know, & open up to the world about it. They label 🏷️ you as a terrorist plain & simple just like that old South Park episode

[@ShahidBey-b3e]

The flower of life is ALL OVER AMERICA. Look at all the colleges big churches aka castles hospitals. THEY JUST F N LIERS. They were created by the Moors.

[@kyonatbest6591]

The easiest way to explain the squareroot of 2 conundrum he proposes is instead of using squareroot of 2 specifically, we use squareroot of x. This can then be written as x^1/2. For the first example, he calls for the result to be raised to the third power, so the simplification of this is x^(3/2). As for the second example, he calls for it to be multiplied by the number itself before it was square root. So for example his case would be 2*(2^(1/2)). In x terms, this can be simplified as him saying x(x^(1/2)). In order to simplify this further, you need the denominator to have the same number before adding them up, so this becomes (x^2/2)(x^(1/2)) which then simply becomes x^(3/2). It's the same result as the first example. His fallacy is what he chooses to represent as x. X was simply the number before he started the squareroot businesses. Because of this, the number 2 isn't anything special, the number 2 is suppose to be his x in this example, the reason why it doesn't work for other numbers is because for other numbers to work, you simply have to use other numbers. If I had taken squareroot of 3, then it would be 3 as the coefficient. You can in fact test this. x^(3/2) is the first example, and for the second example, just try x*(sqaureroot of x). The logical fallacy is his bad assignment on the unknown variable x that led to his second example being wrong and being faulty believing 2 is a static coefficient when in reality, it's x*(squareroot of x). So for example 5^(3/2)=11.1803398875 and 5*(squareroot of 5)=11.1803398875. Try plugging this new equation with any number you can think of and it will hold true. There is nothing wrong with the Math, Terrence just has his logic wrong. The reason why he gets away with what he says is because he says it to people who aren't Mathematicians and brings it up in a public space for you to just tap away into a calculator without putting real thought into the logistics behind his fallacy. He brings it up in a public space where you have to listen to him and take his word at face value instead of testing and figuring it out yourself whether he is right or wrong. Hence, stop listening to celebrities talking out their ass. If a real Mathematician ever believes our foundation is wrong, they would definitely let you know lol As a side note, the guy seems like a con artist that's also a celebrity. He can lie about what he says but he says it with the belief that he's talking the truth that people can mistaken him as a genius. He seems to have lied about his education background several times and tried to scam Uganda at one point as well. Yes, I do mean the WHOLE country of Uganda, just search it up.

[@marcelosinico]

Don't waste your math here. Those people are delusional. They want to believe in anything that makes them feel good.

[@MistaSun-f7w]

During his Oxford Union lecture he explained that his theory only applies to the number 1 and 2. So we hear you when you say “any value can be plugged in as X such as 5” , but I’m just letting u know he addressed this.

[@AncientAli3n777]

Yeah i saw the interview, the guy basically said he's trying to sell Uganda or help them make Hydrogen bombs if i'm not mistaken. 😂

[@daveklein7053]

It appears that you are still struggling with Concepts of math for instance can you adequately explain this: "Exomnium" "Very roughly, a (discrete time) dynamical system is set X together with a function f:X->X. The behavior of the system with some given initial condition x*0*is governed by the recurrence relation x*n+1*=f(x*n*). A classic example of this is the logistic map." ? In other words it probably does not make much sense to try and find the most "advanced" area of mathmatics as most fields are advancing in time and 'parallel'. Mathematicians are not necessarily aware or the goings on in every field. What do you say of polyadic measures of statistical dependency using information theory?

[@grantfryer407]

🤔 oh yes I see now.!

[@green_dog8960]

x^3 = 2x, so subtracting 2x from both sides, we get x^3 - 2x = 0; factoring the x, we get x(x^2 - 2) = 0; so either x = 0 or x^2 -2 = 0; from x^2 - 2 = 0, we find that x = +sqrt(2) or x = -sqrt(2). It is not an "unnatural equation"; it's just simple high school algebra.

[@dalevross]

Well said. Talking about loops and nonsense when relatively simple math can prove why. I say relatively as it's not too advanced but may be hard to follow if you failed high school math. I want to believe there is some esoteric truth to what he's saying but at face value it's all gibberish.

[@junkman7901]

Terrence just can’t understand basic math, he likes his buzzwords though

[@giliusifrit5595]

There is no meaning of the journey. What matters is that we reach the same destination

[@MrBlackspook]

Simple put you are simple wrong . There is no such thing as simple mathematics if it was simple you too would understand the laws of the universe

[@MrBlackspook]

​@@dalevross😂😂😂 SO you thunk public schools give you the tools to understand the the universe?? What planet do you live on😂😂😂

[@jessewilliams6459]

I can't imagine how simple of an experience you must have as a person being a mark for Terrence Howard.

[@beebee4334]

I recall watching a documentary about a man that became a math genius after getting beaten and robbed. He had a brain injury that created a savant level of mathematical understanding. And his vision also changed, in which he saw every object in life made up of FRACTALS (curves like Terrence says here). You can probably Google it and I’m sure the story will come up. The guy was interviewed lots of times. He had to go to back to University in order to begin understanding his new genius, because he didn’t have the formal knowledge and language to explain what he could see visually and calculate in his head. Fascinating story! And his description of what everything in the Universe is made of, matches what Terrence is saying from what I can tell.

[@aya9af]

Jason Padgett. Thank you for posting that. It led me to discovering him and his work/art. Blessings 🙏🏽💗

[@rechtsanwaltzak5878]

What am I reading . And i am qurstioning my everyday being

[@tastymorsel]

​@aya9af can you give me a link or the name of this person?

[@jenifernadeau]

​@rechtsanwaltzak5878 awesome.. you are Awakening to your true starseed Lightworker self❤ They don't want us to know who we are..we're just incarnated here via various lifetimes in a human costume to experience this Earth School. Nothing to fear❤

[@tovah2276]

@@aya9afare you saying the person that @beebee4334 is talking about is named Jason Padgett or was that a comment to someone named that? Sorry, I need more sleep but would love to know if you found the link of if the persons name that bee bee is talking about is indeed Jason Padgett. THANK YOU if you respond. I LOVE researching TBI’s and their outcome especially when it is such an outcome like this one. NOTHING ceases to amaze me and yet EVERYTHING CAN AMAZE ME!!🙏🏻🙏🏻❤❤

[@krisg3984]

It’s always exciting when a new way of thinking wiggles the brain into opening up. Quantum physics and sacred geometry is all about realizing the activity of Life Itself - deep, vibratory, and ongoing. Those that want to sleep through life, so be it. Some want to know More ! Let’s look into this now .

[@MichaelSchwab-nk4rm]

Well Stated Friend

[@gmwadams9495]

I believe so too

[@ceb1970]

So this is where all the crazy people on the internet gather.

[@justinjones8583]

⁠@@ceb1970Define crazy…

[@juddbiggs]

Realizing craziness is the beginning of intelligence?

[@mjl5376]

Comment section : We dont understand simple math, but terrence howard is a math genius.

[@Rj-nh1df]

He's also highly racist individual

[@apaulosmith5653]

This is an amazing screening process to ensure only the dumbest of the dumb show up for your cult

[@karlkarlsson9126]

This is called, pseudoscience.

[@sulaymantouraytravel]

@@Rj-nh1df the moment you start talking shit its a deflection, thats what you mofos do when you dont want to face the intelligence.

[@FreeMan-ej6mj]

​​@@karlkarlsson9126This is not pseudoscience. This is degradation. He believes that multiplication always increase. What about 0×2=0 or 0.5×0.5=0.25. Is he familiar with complex algebra? What about qaternions? How many algebras he knows? :-)

[@michaelpeterson1928]

First of All ,most of us knows Terrence`s movies but this is a New Man right in front of all of us...............

[@jillwilburn813]

It’s not him….its his clone. 😢

[@Skylin-q3x]

How do you know... stop this s,,,rn​@@jillwilburn813

[@mosiahmuata3199]

It's him. Just more mentally heightened

[@ivanmedic3613]

Id argue its the exact same man, same actor new spiel

[@CAceD-t7b]

Yeah, his word salad instead of sense 😂

[@TruthInYourFace]

Take the Square Root of "4". 1. Multiply it by "2" (Result: "4"). 2. Add "2" to it. (Result: "4"). Divide the Result by 2, then perform Operations 1 & 2 again. OMG!!! WE'RE GETTING THE SAME RESULT FROM 2 DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL OPERATIONS ON THE SAME NUMBER NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES WE LOOP THROUGH THE STEPS . We're finally seeing the results from removing "Math" as an essential subject to graduate from GRADE SCHOOL. And by the way, another term for "multiply" is "groups of". So when you "group" something ONCE (i.e. A x 1 ), you're NOT ADDING OR REMOVING ANYTHING FROM IT. (watering crops with Gatorade doesn't seem too far away)

[@henrlima87]

But.... its got what plants crave!

[@JerubaalXerxes]

1x1... take 1 then multiply it once. You get 2. So even 2x1 should be take 2 multiply it once you get 4. 2x2 take 2 multiply it twice I end up with 3 groups of 2 if you say the answer is having 2 groups of 2 where is the original 2 you made copies of?

[@lukeatbrandynightful]

@@JerubaalXerxeswhy are you making simple math’s complicated. Multiplying is just another word for ‘groups of’, 1 group of one apple = 1 apple. 0 groups of one apple = 0. A five year old understands this

[@alexanderying1558]

You found a contradiction! Such a loop cannot exist, hence 2x2=5! Seriously though, why the hell is anybody even paying attention to Terrence Howard anymore. If somebody listens to his mathematical arguments and think it makes any sort of sense, they are just plain dumb, sorry. He has not expressed a single coherent mathematical thought, he is literally trying to explain basic arithmetic with electromagnetism. Frustrates me that there are people that take him seriously and unironically make videos like this. - a Cambridge maths student

[@bigwill-gc7su]

​@@lukeatbrandynightfulyou get two groups of one

[@larrymansfield9393]

I will never look at Terrence Howard as an actor again, wow!

[@NeotheOne88]

I had NO idea this guy was this intelligent 🤯

[@clevertaco306]

@@NeotheOne88 He's not. But the not so smart people think he is, unfortunately.

[@clevertaco306]

Yeah, now he can be looked at as an idiot too.

[@LylyNynx]

@@clevertaco306 another sheep in place to keep misleading everyone. go back to your depths.

[@akritasdigenis4831]

​@@clevertaco306I bet your iq is below 90.

[@igot2020vision]

The square root of 2 can be simplified to 1.41 to make this easier to read. 1.41 cubed can be written as 1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41 We can simplify this because 1.41 is the square root of two, meaning 1.41 x 1.41 = 2 so 1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41 can also be written as 1.41 x 2. 1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41 = 1.41 x 2 The square root of 2 cubed and the square root of 2 multiplied by 2 are the same, not because of some maths breaking enigma that some "genius" came up with who says that it means 1x1=2, but because of simple maths and how numbers work. Also 4/2 = 2 therefore 2/1 = 1 is such a childish way of looking at maths. Take it in the other direction to see if it works, 8/4 = 4, oh wait, not it doesn't. Because you cannot just half or double all of the numbers in an equation and have it make sense. 3 x 5 = 15, but 6 x 10 does not equal 30. 4 x 4 = 16, but 2 x 2 does not equal 8. Because you cannot simply double or half all of the numbers and have it make sense. This is one of the most frustrating things I have witnessed recently and I hope people go and seek actual education or actually think for themselves instead of listening to this video and taking your word as gospel. This is in your face misinformation, for what reason?

[@outlawedTV88]

Nope, sorry you have been brainwashed in school given those false equations that do not mean shit in nature and have nothing to do with the reality of things, one more tip for you Zero does not exist in nature - anywhere!!! Its just a number therefore all math is false

[@alanhull-ii5ip]

You never educated yourself when it come to taking the vaccines you took either 😂

[@parnikaa2849]

Exactly what I was thinking, everything else makes sense. The equation 2x=x^3 has real world solutions, which are 0, -1.41 & 1.41. You could also do the same with the square root of 5, 7 or any number for that matter. It's food for thought but at the end of the day the square root conventions do remain the same, this is what I've concluded atleast. Infact, you could do the same for the cube root of 5. 5x=x^4, where x=cube_root(5). It's something like the nth root of a certain number y = x and x raised to the power (n+1) is : where n=root number, y=number whose root is taken, x= nth root of y. I would've loved to believe something new in mathematics but logic and intuition still deem these humanly correct. It is human made convention but from our level, it does explain a lot, for me atleast.

[@parnikaa2849]

And the part about 1x1=2 doesn't sit right if you're using the modern base 10 number system. If you take the one to the other side. The part where he used 2x2=4 for comparison is a different thing since 2 is the square root of 4. 3x3=9, 4x4=16 etc all make sense because when you multiply a number with itself, you get its square. Following this pattern, 1x1=2 would mean 1 is the square root of 2? Sorry for the rant, feel free to correct me or share more insights.

[@j_r28]

Man! That's just what I commented, I was trying to find if anyone already pointed it out. But let me tell you this 95+% people on the planet are dumb, they don't understand or question basic principles, now wonder that guy has millions of views.

[@SagarRathva-oo5rm]

it's kinda crazy how nobody's talking about the forbidden ebook called hidden laws of the game on borlest

[@tomaccino]

Why would anyone talk about an ebook written in ChatGPT 😂😂

[@kimnielsen5692]

Stop posting your marketing everywhere

[@ivanmedic3613]

@@kimnielsen5692 shills on top of shills

[@daylesuess552]

It's a book written by crazies

[@ivanmedic3613]

@@daylesuess552 nope, its a book thats sold to crazies, quite profitable now days

[@endasil]

The fine art of dragging out a video as much as possible without ever having to get to the point.

[@prayunceasingly2029]

There's no point in my opinion. Just convoluted basic math

[@RonWrightwrites]

@endasil yeah, that's why I watch 15 seconds of a video, then look at tons of comments and then discern whether it is worth it to finish watching the vid based on the feedback that others have given.

[@LokimonWasHere]

Thanks now I know not to waste my time watching this 😊

[@DenisDamulira23]

He got to the point. you need to rewatch it until you get it. The point is, we cannot advance as fast as we could with approximated math. Our math needs to accurately match the universe if we are to visit other galaxies, make better tech some of which can be self-healing etc. With the right math we can eradicate death etc. Everything in the universe is perfected math in various states.

[@rumrstv]

Sounds like you're trying to turn math into a new religion. Math only reflects the universe. It does not control it.

[@Rose-gt2yi]

Respect to anyone who says, “I’m willing to bring the truth at whatever cost that comes with it” then stands on what they say.👏🏻👏🏻

[@rcormonutube]

Too dramatic for this snake oil...

[@georgie8609]

Refreshing

[@Rillip]

No. No that's not how science works.

[@thebatman911]

Yeah, even if they're wrong!

[@iamOAKland]

How can you take a 20yr veteran actor serious!!! People these days!!!! So tell me when is he in character or not!!! Please tell me anybody!!!!!!!!! Get the fuck outta here!!! I will never take an actor serious, don’t care who it is!!!!

[@suichinggo8236]

I'm not a math genius. But my understanding of multiplication is that it's a simplified addition. 1 x 1 mean 1 "of" 1 = 1. 3 x 2= 6, mean 3 of 2's , 2+2+2; 5 x 0= 0, mean 5 of nothing, 0+0+0+0+0. Doesn't X cube mean X times X times X? Not 2X nor X+X.

[@buffhotchkiss7400]

They can't do math😂😂😂😂🎉

[@kevinlee8732]

Yeah 1x1 is 1 happening once. It's 1, one time. So it's always 1. 1x0 is 1 happening zero times. So there was never a one, it was hypothetical and that's where he is flawed in his theory here, he's assuming 1x1 means you are taking two 1s and multiplying them. You're not. The numbers are representations, not real. Like the girl in the talk said as soon as you do the math with a physical object like a laptop, one laptop, times one, is itself. It's one laptop, appearing once. One laptop plus another laptop gives you a 2nd laptop, it's one laptop, appearing twice, or two times, becoming two laptops.. 1 PLUS 1 is two. But one TIMES 1, IS Never more than 1. It's the exact number your multiplying, represented one time. That's all it means.

[@mr.showers3265]

1 plus 1 = a bigger one! 😅

[@Chinese_MartialArts]

0 × 3 = 0 How many have you got? ...0? No, you have 3. This is along the lines of Mr Howards theory. Conventional Math is foundationally flawed and thus so is our society. Conventional Maths is based on theory when basic maths is based upon physical objects.

[@wtchoutna]

​@@kevinlee8732yes, but I see both points although he is getting very literal with the wording. However he's made other good points and discoveries. Things just go back to the origins of things. For instance, why are there 10 digits? 9 if you don't want to count 0 but why not 7 or 17 individual digits for example, although I know why but what I'm trying to say is that he's going back trying to make sure the foundations are correct. I've often wondered about if say, alien math would be the same as our math you know? Have we missed something? If so, how? Where did it evolve from? It is crazy to think about if there is a much more advanced species or civilization in the universe, would they in fact use the same math as us? Or is there something that's just gone over our heads, like how many early civilizations didn't use "0" in their math. Which is crazy to think of now but is there another "0" that we simply haven't realized yet? So it's a good thing to question and re explore the possibility that our foundations could be flawed. Because there are some flaws with our system. and like, why they can't figure out the right equations to explain all of physics. I find it suspect that there seems to be two separate rules to physics because it doesn't scale down correctly. This is another example of why our math may be flawed. I don't like the answer of "because it just is[different]" so I think he's on the right path.

[@jerrydonquixote5927]

When I see anything that upsets the mainstream narrative, I'm listening! So I'm listening to Terrence Howard!

[@c.kainoabugado7935]

Smart!! Check out the 12 Universal Laws or Hermetica on 7 Laws. They're life changing when applied properly. I'm in training and already benefiting💯✌🏾

[@tristanalbert3856]

and that's how you become a dumb conspirationnist just wanting to be a special snowflake.

[@c.kainoabugado7935]

@@tristanalbert3856 such judgment! Who are you to decide when and how a stranger learns and integrates information? What projection of beliefs upon another without anyone asking or consent👀 Curious act against Universal Law. Law of Attraction returns to your environment what you put out into the universe as a norm. Perhaps you're unaware of the Universal Laws that you operate as a Spiritual Being in a human body🤔

[@jerrydonquixote5927]

@tristanalbert3856 whatever sheepleton take your boosters and be a good sheep!

[@jerrydonquixote5927]

@@tristanalbert3856 🤣🤡

[@AyKuTRyu]

If one is unaware of an unpleasant fact or situation one cannot be troubled by it. Ignorance is bliss.

[@Rick_SanchezZZZ]

Nah... More like quantum mechanics... Nothing is EVERYTHING simultaneously and is not. Depending on the observing party. Don't ever trade your awareness for anything else. Ignorance is stupidity and blindness and deafness and muteness and most of all WEAKNESS! IF YOU'RE STRONG, YOU CHANGE IT instead of ignoring it. Change begins within. In your mind. Don't waste or trade your mind for ignorance, yuqqqq...

[@AyKuTRyu]

@@Rick_SanchezZZZ Bro that was a message for the ignorant fellas.😊

[@AyKuTRyu]

@@bildfluss Actually it is not KZbin science. The thing is, we live in a time where we have very quick access to any information that we need. Just type anything into Google, you'll get your answer. Easy cheesy but back in the days it was very difficult, so you had to read books most of the time and study for yourself. People who are older than the Z Generation, they had the advantage to experience things the way the kids from today don't.

[@Sourceality]

Ignorance is sufforing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉😂

[@vaisnavaoneday9223]

Ignorance is bliss only for the ignorant.

[@bennbanes6359]

I'm sat here with my 13yr old son and 7 years old daughter Infront of an open fire in rural Spain. Just knowing I am sat here doing this, makes the 10yr old me very proud. Not sure many fathers would take the time or effort showing and discussing these things with their kids this. I am so super lucky

[@j_r28]

Please don't show your kids about these stupid people, whatever he's saying is completely bullshit, he doesn't understand the basic math, must have missed the classes 😂😂

[@ShifuCareaga]

Congrats you taught your kids to be dumber.

[@javi8438]

rural Spain, the best in the world. Hope you enjoy our marvellous Country ❤

[@undergroundmetals498]

That's awesome, Keep teaching them ❤

[@bennbanes6359]

@@javi8438 as I sit almost at sunset, eating a Plato Del Monte, everything sourced locally. I feel so grateful and lucky. Such a wonderful country ♥️♥️💪💪

[@Jnrbebe]

Everything will be revealed... Because we are in a final chapter... People are starting to be awake to their counciousnes..

[@DrifterSpirit9]

There are so many things that are getting revealed lately,so many things being all of a sudden admitted by the leaders of churches,so many rights being handed to people as it should,so many climate changes going on,so many informations released to the people...I also believe we are reaching that final chapter of this endless cicle.

[@MrSaljstn]

Worldwide conscious shift incoming

[@v1kt0us]

@@MrSaljstn ... and it will be called "AGI or ASI" 🧐

[@SP-rx4tb]

This is a NEW book not a final chapter it’s like a lost book of truth we have found ppl are the pages

[@msbabycakes001]

I'm starting to realize this too, i was half asleep for over 30 years

[@Andriastravels]

At 4:24 "Multiply means to make more, right?" No, incorrect. Finished, on to the next video.

[@trninfan]

How did you get that far?

[@lisariggio6916]

This is why I failed math,it didn't make sense to me

[@rayderian2212]

Lol

[@JordanBondhus]

Yes you may have failed, and only “You can decide if you are an expert”

[@MrChriscoleman2030]

It went over my head as well 😂😂 I didn’t know that this actor was that smart, absolutely brilliant man!

[@vivveq]

touche!

[@QueueBall2020]

And actually tells me they didn't know what the f*** they was teaching us...

[@wadecoppage5583]

4:10 I'm just getting started, but one thing about addition and multiplication is they are related but not exactly connected. There's a reason we say 'times' because it's literally. 2x2 is 2 2 times, so 1x1 is 1 1 time, which is 1. To say 1x1 should be 2 doesn't work with the basics of multiplication.

[@soapenvelope]

Yes. And 1x0=0 because it is one at zero times. And zero is useless math, like we never wrote it

[@spacesciencelab]

If 1x1=1 then how come 2x2=4. It should be 2.

[@yami4g63]

if you stay within the lie then sure.

[@yami4g63]

@@soapenvelope you have something and add nothing too it.... now magically have nothing again......seems legit.

[@BrianTemple-lx6mt]

But your reasoning is based on the only thing we’ve known or been taught until Terrence shed light on this fallacy.

[@razorsharp2526]

So if I give you 1 apple 1 time, I did not give you 1 apple but actually 2? Wow, this guy is a genious!!

[@chrisbenson6683]

He lost me with that and at multiply means making more. Don't get tripped up by semantics.

[@iammichaeldavis]

I can’t even start to sympathize with where Howard is coming from. Like, what is 4x1? 70x1? A million times one? Timesing by one just gets you the value that’s been multiplied by one, one time. This is so easy to understand I just can’t see where he’s gotten lost 😅 The first page from his book shown on screen asked: “If 4/2=2 is the opposite of 2x2=4, shouldn’t 2/1=2 be the opposite of 1x1=2?” Like it’s this big ‘gotcha!’ But like…. No, man, “1x2=2” would be the opposite, big homie. This is kindergarten shit, Hustle & Flow. 2/1 doesn’t result in one, so I just can not even begin to find an inroad in my mind to how he could have so missed the bus on this.

[@nickbailey9622]

4/2=2 2×2=4 Now 2/1=2 1×1=1 Look at the numbers position. Replace 1x1=1 With 2x1=2 Hummm this is basic maths.

[@qret-dv5ym]

Lol

[@HUNKtm]

Just look real quick at the other videos of this channel to understand we are in a very weird "new age" trip here "free your vibrations", "regenerate your body", "the third eye" all these shits, like come on...

[@adarshbisht6137]

Humans - 1x1 is 2 Aliens - We failed in making advance civilization

[@jchomedog2887]

I think what people fail to understand about multiplication is that the numbers you multiply by determine the group of multipliers. So 1X1 = 1 group of 1 which equals 1. 2X2 = 2 groups of 2 which equals 4. He’s missing the fundamental concept of math and how it groups numbers. Multiplication is a quicker way for a person to understand larger groups of numbers so less time is taken to calculate the total number. This is also why people learn the multiplication table so that you can get answers quicker by memorizing their groupings up through 9 until they repeat themselves using more than single digits.

[@Justineyedia]

“… The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity". Tesla

[@LifeIsBetterWithLove]

Yep.

[@giliusifrit5595]

Good concept, always aware of aether as I use its metaphysical power. But here you have put the rest of a wonderful theory into solid purpose rooted in reality. Thank you !

[@macheadg5er]

lol he never said that

[@Dempdawg11]

Where did that quote come from

[@ymartinez3]

I asked ChatGPT and said this " ChatGPT No, that quote does not seem to be attributed to any credible source or recognized figure. It contains several scientific inaccuracies and misconceptions. Electromagnetic fields do play crucial roles in various phenomena, including the behavior of celestial bodies, but the statement oversimplifies and misrepresents these concepts. Additionally, the claim that electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity is false; gravity is a fundamental force described by modern physics, and electromagnetic levitation does not invalidate its existence or effects.

[@drZarqawi]

This is insane to a degree I didn't think possible. And those people just lap it up.... "OMG you're legit genius..." lol

[@PrettyGoodLookin]

It's not insane. Terrence is briniging up reality and common sense.

[@drZarqawi]

@@PrettyGoodLookin Common sense? He doesn't understand half the words he uses... And his narcissistic ramblings has nothing to do with reality.

[@KeishaHart2]

​@@drZarqawi YOU are a natural born closed minded HATER. No, DOCTOR Zarqawi, he's probably using words that YOU don't understand... Hater.

[@KeishaHart2]

Also the man has documented PATENTS! Do you Dr. Zarqawi?? I'm waiting...

[@drZarqawi]

@@KeishaHart2 OMG he paid to have his nonsense ideas patentet!! OMG it totally proves he's a complete genius. I FINALLY SEE THE ERRORS OF MY WAYS, THANK YOU GOD FOR SHOWING THIS GUIDANCE.

[@Downecker]

I'm 74 and in my schooling I was taught HOW to think, not WHAT to think! I always thought " outside the box" before I ever heard the phrase! Don't make choices without knowing all the facts. It's amazing how "gut feelings " stems from subconscious logical reasoning!😂 These feelings are so correct in outcome!

[@Nacho-Mamma]

There are two basic types of thought groups: 1) The group that follows the heart, having approximately an 40% possibility of choosing correctly. 2) The group that follows the gut, having approximately an 85% possibility of choosing correctly. Now, taken in the fact that I just took a big gulp of NyQuil, and I'm high as a kite, my tongue is green, and I just pulled that out of my ass, it does sound plausible,

[@Itsnevertolate]

Exactly, it's funny how "outside the box" is most commonly referenced with multiple personalities. Most people can't step outside of the world to see the world for what it is. Nothing is what it seems.

[@Nacho-Mamma]

@@Itsnevertolate It's all an illusion. I figured that out years ago, and have been told I'm insane.

[@Itsnevertolate]

@@Nacho-Mamma Yeah, anyone who does not go along with their story becomes a crazy lunatic. It's even worse when you believe in God. Anyways, there is no normal. We're all different. So there is no basis to call anybody crazy.

[@Nacho-Mamma]

@@Itsnevertolate "There's no basis to call anybody crazy"? Really? What about those weirdos who believe in oversized buses with giant wings that magically fly through the air? Because, those weirdos ARE crazy! Why, I bet they even believe you can row a boat to some mystical netherworld without falling over the edge of the giant turtles back! Those crazy weirdos!

[@wardenwilson6725]

The second I heard Howard's equation "1x1=2", I knew he should stick to acting. I'll give him credit. Although Terrence Howard is certainly no genius. He deserves an Oscar for how he fooled so many people into believing he is one. BRAVO ! Sorry to all you "Terrence Is A Genius" club members. But 1x1 will always, always, always, equal 1!

[@In-his-image]

You fool

[@wardenwilson6725]

@@In-his-image That's it?

[@DirtyHerrie.official]

Thank you! Can't believe all these so called geniuses on this Terry trip

[@dreedwards7802]

A Fool will always be a fool

[@wardenwilson6725]

@@DirtyHerrie.official Yeah, I can! It's amazing what stupid people will believe. Especially Americans!

[@elaineremains]

that math example where you showed 4/2 is the same as 2*2=4 and the extrapolated that to 2/1 is the same as 1*1=2 well that's wrong, coz 2/1=2 as far as i know and that means the 'same' equation isn't 1*1=2 it's 1*2=2 so that whole basic premise is wrong, and him saying that 1*1 doesn't make anything bigger, then what about multiplying by half, it makes it smaller, but it's still multiplication... i think math is off too, i put it in my novel lol but those examples aren't good

[@berthavegagalicia1276]

Thanks! It’s not difficult to realice that Terrance doesn’t know anything about basic math. Does he even know what is a multiplication? He needs to return to elementary school

[@elaineremains]

@@berthavegagalicia1276 i'm not sure what's going on with him, this is the first video i have seen about this business... i was just questioning the basics.. we have to admit that the square root of 2 looks weird lol and he's right about the hypotenuse being wrong if the two sides of a right angle triangle are one in length, if indeed one squared + one squared = hypotenuse squared....

[@sam5694]

​@@berthavegagalicia1276 or maybe you need to remove the elementary programming out of you!

[@berthavegagalicia1276]

@@sam5694 basic programming is just basic math and logic rules. Why do you think is the reason that internet could exist?

[@tuxsax]

@@berthavegagalicia1276 he apparently doesn't know what multiplication is, because he's claiming it means "making more"... Yeah, when you multiply your income you're making more money, but it's not always the case... He has some valid points, but the problem is that when someone is saying something, which can be a very strong truth, but it's basing himself in weak and wrong claims, it looses credibility... I do believe everything in math is bullshit, and don't give me that shit about "thanks to math you're writing this comment in a computer over the internet", because then you're implying that humanity has got necessarily better, which I disagree. The whole nature goes by perfectly without knowing nor applying all those math and physics laws. An eagle doesn't need Newton's discovery of gravity to know how to fly and defy it, a duck never went "eureka" when he simply sits and floats in the lake, he doesn't care his body causes an upforce that is equal to the volume of liquid his body displaced... All those "universal laws" were simply ways we have to explain what doesn't need to be explained for it to exist. It's simply because our ego and limited mind can't simply enjoy the ride on this planet without having to measure and explain every frigging thing. But of course, once you invent all those measuring and this silly game of playing with numbers, of course everything turns to be "science, which is based on facts that were empirically proven". Of course you can prove it! You're using the very tools you invented to prove it! Why wouldn't a hawk try to pray on a goat? Because he won't be able to lift it, too big, too heavy. how does they know that? They don't need scales and weights calculations, they just know, because it's programmed inside their DNA after millions of years of evolution. So, who needs math? Only we do, just because we can't simply live without explaining every thing.

[@judithlabarosa9564]

There are things that no matter what i do i just cant understand. I gave up and just enjoy life with my children.

[@AmadeuShinChan]

You have become one of those phenomenons you talked about, yourself.😂

[@truecrime98]

Personally I feel like I have an obligation to my children to find out the truth as it affects their lives and their children’s lives.

[@KonamisQuest]

Never give up. Never choose willful ignorance for the sake of comfort. Do the hard things, do the scary things! Otherwise you are not growing or using your potential. We are NOT alive to procreate and die.

[@robwhite461]

@@AmadeuShinChan Never ceases to amaze me to know of beings like you, a creature of such wisdom who likes to mock but not pass on their higher knowledge. Your no better that those who choose to conceal.

[@chrisdaldy-rowe4978]

@@KonamisQuest Yes indeed what you have typed is true.I've allways said to my children,its easy to do nothing & in the end thats what you'll get.So go out there & live life to its fullest & along the way you will discover the 'true' you & learn to love that person as you will others.I love yo vibes m8 : ))

[@susanharrer4024]

I love that he is brave to shake our minds & make us think!

[@vincentmcbride6210]

He's not brave he's insane lol

[@martinmikkelsen-yd8sn]

@@vincentmcbride6210 if normality is running around driving other people crazy then insane seem like something you want to be...

[@xydny0437]

​@@vincentmcbride6210 says a mortal being 😂

[@vincentmcbride6210]

@@xydny0437 I know i shouldn't talk about a God like terence howard he's on a another level.

[@mrmagoo9249]

You’re not thinking

[@toddwturneratgmail9307]

We are taught in school that multiplication is repetitive addition as follows: 1x5=1+1+1+1+1=5 1x4=1+1+1+1=4 1x3=1+1+1=3 1x2=1+1=2 1x1=1=1 The basis of Howard's math is false therefore the rest of this math is false if it is based on 1x1=2.

[@jnuhjnuh]

"we're taught" ... What if there was a law that states you can only start a multiplication with an addition.

[@crimsonApex89]

0x1=1

[@manjukasoysa3901]

​​@@jnuhjnuh Then you would get a different mathematics . Problem is people are looking for truth in mathematics . Whereas it's just starting from some assumptions (axioms) and just projecting from there. Change the axioms and you get different projections. Depending on the axioms you get more or less contradictions . That's all, there's no "real" truths in Mathematics (or nature actually ) Also some mathematics is useful in modelling nature , others are not. Euclidian geometry was good enough for a long time, but then they came up with non-Euclidian with different axioms. Both are useful.

[@jnuhjnuh]

​@@manjukasoysa3901 ... I want some pi

[@belathewhite6173]

@@crimsonApex89 wrong, just use your common sense jesus christ. zero times ! there are ZERO 1's !! WHEN THERE ARE ZERO OF SOMETHING THAT MEANS THE SAME AS THERE ARE NONE !!! ITS ZERO !!!

[@MsSoFruity]

Terence is talking about how everything in the universe, at its most basic level, boils down to motions and conditions, specifically those involving electricity and magnetism. Electricity and Magnetism as Motion: Electricity is described as a centripetal force, meaning it moves toward the center. This kind of motion can be likened to things moving inward or contracting.Magnetism, on the other hand, is a centrifugal motion, meaning it moves away from the center, akin to expansion or spreading out. Matter and Elements: Everything physical (matter) is essentially these motions of electricity and magnetism. These motions aren't just random but follow specific patterns and cycles-what Terence calls "periodic pressure conditions. "An element (like hydrogen, carbon, etc.) is not a static thing; it’s a specific set of pressure conditions that can change under different circumstances. This implies that by changing these conditions, one element can transform into another. For example, carbon under intense pressure becomes diamond. Perception of Elements: Our human perception is quite limited; we only see a tiny fraction of what's actually out there. For instance, hydrogen is the first element we can perceive, but there are 21 elements before it that we don't see.Elements have predictable behaviors and relationships that can sometimes seem to defy basic logic, such as the placement of hydrogen in the periodic table not following the expected pattern of having three elements before and after it. Universal Cycles and States: Everything is continuously alive in various states, driven by these fundamental motions. The concept of "death" as we know it doesn’t really apply universally; it’s more about different states of being. He also emphasizes the continuous cycle of existence, much like breathing where there’s an inhale and exhale, symbolizing the cycles of matter and energy throughout the universe. Behavior of Light: Light doesn't travel but instead reproduces through a cycle of life stages in what he describes as octaves, which could be understood as waves or frequencies of light. In simple terms, Terence views the universe as a complex but predictable dance of pressures and motions, where everything from the smallest element to light itself participates in continuous, cyclical patterns of existence. This view challenges traditional notions about the static nature of elements and the linear travel of light, proposing a more dynamic and interconnected universal behavior.

[@Bassline_Rebel]

traditional ie light in Straight line ...errr you forgot about both states of light. Our traditional knowledge Is that light is Not just a straight line But you are other points are pretty good

[@robertadams5437]

He ignored the strong and weak forces, so he only has half the equation

[@jiffyliciousfood1003]

This is deep.

[@CrouchingscarabflyingJ]

If you want to know more check out the life work of Richard Alpert now known as Ram Dass

[@Roy-cv8el]

How is turning carbon into a diamond an example of changing one element into another? I mean, isn't that like saying turning water into ice is changing one element to another?

[@Budwords]

The guy pushed the "3am high asf conversation's at a random party with the weirdo guy" to the next level

[@MegaJo123456789]

It's now three am and I'm getting high n drunk while watching this, cheers buddy I'll pour one out for you 🍻

[@IAMFENYX]

And look at all of the people buying it. Lmao.

[@MIris44474]

​@DJ_FENYX why, how do you know he's wrong?

[@IAMFENYX]

@@MIris44474 Because I paid attention in school and understand basic math. The idea that 1x1=2 does not make any sense, nor does it work. Show me undeniable proof that it does.

[@meeerreacts2220]

@@IAMFENYXwhy doesn’t it work ?

[@rumplestillskin6424]

If I add 1 apple plus one apple I get two .but if I use that to try to find the area of 1 inch square.what do you do if 1 x 1 equals 2 .which is wrong in this case it's 1 side multipled by 1 equals 1 inch square.in a area form

[@julialewis2889]

It also shows us how important for us as a human beings to communicate personally on a physical level. Not through the devices. Because through personal communication we exchange the energies… And do not be afraid of “negative “energy. We need that too in some level…

[@tylershadlow5792]

These are the types of unhinged nutjobs that Terrence is trying to trick into think he's smart everyone. Remember this

[@Siranoxz]

I understand now why Terrence Howard was never in the other Iron Man sequels lol.. It makes sense now..

[@kenstack3926]

It's because he beats women.

[@SamJ_1980]

​@@kenstack3926And abusive behavior is usually a good indicator of narcissistic tendencies, not mathematical genius.

[@lydia6778]

​@@kenstack3926Sheep

[@sagargorasia2734]

Because he is high asf

[@TonyLorenzano]

What?

[@BatkoNashBandera774]

One of the greatest gifts of Terrence's book is that as I'm reading it, my mind's eye is narrating in his voice.

[@KrystynaNapierala-r7q]

Surely, in such a case, there must be the Prince of the Air in service.

[@HowieRosemansDad]

The published mathematician says this is what happens when someone overthinks! If he was so smart he would realize how his theories are ridiculous!

[@Jermaine-nb3ih]

A eagles fan would say that

[@SINEWEAVER-]

@@Jermaine-nb3ih his shit is ridiculous. He doesn't even know the words he spews.

[@ciscosoto1]

It's frustrating not able to understand what this is all about.... feel helpless not having the capacity to learn something's no matter how many times I read or listen. My hard reality is not all minds are created equal. Keep sharing knowledge.

[@bobbucks]

Thats the point of this. Its gobbtygook. Its abstract enough for uneducated people to feel like they're close to a grand realization. Everything Terrance described is very understood by plenty of people.

[@fivestar2227]

The part I can relate to is the chemistry about using different pressures, temperatures and molecular mixtures to alter molecules. Almost like this is the reason that all chemistry is the way it is or something. I just dont see how we can utilize such revelations to veer off the path the elite puppet masters prefer us to be on. We can see from a new angle now but how can we put this new way of thinking to use?

[@BlaBlabla-k8w]

Dont worry. I studied physics and ik dont understand. They make it sound like logic, but they mix up things all other time, like atoms and molecules. This is nice stuff for some cult, but for anything useful to come of it it needs a lot of work

[@jeffk7290]

One has to acquire knowledge first in order to understand what is in front of him. Otherwise one is subject to understanding anything and distinguishing nothing.One has to acquire knowledge first in order to understand what is in front of him. Otherwise one is subject to understanding anything and distinguishing nothing.

[@IamSasha_C_Star]

You are smart enough, look into basics. Look up spiritual geometry.

[@likahartzenberg-tn9wd]

BUT !!!!!!!! This man took his life away from the sick hollywood and he is approaching his destiny that our Heavenly Father has for each and every one of us, Terence is shifting in alignment with his Godley destiny . Amen

[@Masterofmultiverse]

Square root of 2 can be written as 2^(0.5) Case 1: Multiplying the square root by 2 = 2^(0.5) x 2 = 2^(0.5 + 1) = 2^(1.5). By the product rule of exponents. Case 2: Cubing the square root = (2^0.5)^3 = 2^(0.5 x 3) = 2^(1.5). By the power rule of exponents. Case 1 = Case 2. Hence Proved. This is basic.

[@abenezerfetsum3632]

Thank you, dude finally someone with some sense. it is crazy what social media is doing nowadays. First, it was political misinformation, then religious now people are attacking the foundations of math and Science. What the heck is happening?

[@johncaccioppo1142]

@@abenezerfetsum3632 Fascism depends on intellectual collapse. We are being herded into a machine... I don't think it will end well.

[@nhonnguyen7841]

@@abenezerfetsum3632 "Trust the science" happened...healthy dose of distrust in institutionalized, politically driven dogma.

[@greenmail2012]

1 x1 =1 because the expression is representing 1 group of 1 which would equal 1. Similar to 2x2 equals 4 because you have 2 groups of 2 for a total of 4 and so on.

[@daphnesuarez5924]

Too bad he can't understand that right?

[@bukdays]

There are two major flaws in his logic… x^3 = 2x = x+x This might seem weird, but this only holds for sqrt(2) So x^3 = x*x*x Let’s put x = sqrt(2): sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) = (sqrt(2)*(sqrt(2)) * sqrt(2) = 2 * sqrt (2) Which is the same as 2x and x+x, with x = sqrt(2) The reason x^3 = 2x in this case, is because the ‘2’ we see in ‘2x’ is the square of sqrt(2). The second flaw 4/2 has inverse operation 2*2 (correct), yet saying that concludes the inverse operation is 2/1 is 1*1 is false. The reason the inverse operation of 4/2 is 2*2 is because 4/2 = 2, so to find the inverse operation we multiply the result (2) and the number we divide by (2) and this equals the number we diveded (4): 2*2 = 4 Now lets do the same for 2/1. 2/1 = 2, we want to multiply the result (2) with the number we divided by (1), giving us the number we diveded (2) this gives us: 1*2 = 2, which is the correct inverse operation of 2/1 I think it would be very cool if we could disprove the math we use, but there are no fallacies in the equations he shows. There are only misunderstandings by Terrence Howard

[@afrika-karibianaestudionan4050]

It seems that he chose to refuse to recognize the difference of the "=" signs in: x³ = 2x ... ("=" is an equation sign) and (√2)³ = 2√2 ... ("=" is an equal sign)

[@dafurious6457]

exactly. he's intentionally complicating it and making it seem like he's so smart because the people who believe him can't tell the difference

[@joseph1541]

I’d love it if you could make a video explaining this while writing it out and comparing it to Terrance’s claims. You’d gain a ton of views and I’d be here for it.

[@ShadowRulah]

​@@joseph1541No you wouldn't, people doing math correctly is boring the guy from Hustle and Flow going insane is awesome.

[@UnTangledUrn]

It's funny how you guys are all useless..whereas he owns 97 patents, 1 to a lightning gun lmao you are just online pretending you're smart..stop lol

[@H8TDGAMING]

Here is an easy way to understand 1x1=1 5x5=25 or 5+5+5+5+5=25 Now do the same with 1 1x1=1 or 1=1 There is nothing to multiply. 5x5=25 because there are five 5s 1×1=1 because there is only one 1 Hope that helps

[@ragetotheend]

Not really. Ppl will just add your 1x1=1 as a 1+1=2. The real way to think about it is like a pack of beer. If you have 4x3=12 you can understand that 1x1=1. 1beer and not 2. I dont even drink. 😅

[@H8TDGAMING]

@@ragetotheend Could have had me fooled by the way you constructed your reply.

[@ragetotheend]

@@H8TDGAMING bottom line that man is nuts.

[@mrscorp2011]

This is the simplified explanation to counter Terrence than those explained too long on their comments.

[@seanpoore500]

1x1=3. 1x1=1 1+1+1=3, if this is wrong than life itself would not exist. There is always more than 1 right answer. Just as there is more than one way to accomplish a task, math is no different. Math is a building block not a puzzle, used to interpret reality. The issue with mainstream math and why not everyone can grasp it’s concepts is it’s only portrayed from a single perspective, much like science. which is were it’s limitations lay. Even in math nothing is definitive. For there is always another perspective observing the equation. You cannot judge a fish’s intelligence by its ability to climb a tree. Einstein..

[@evolutionofyou5339]

That loop is life this is why we live without the will to fight. We just accept. Whatever. The rulers give

[@carolinejohnson1249]

Not enemy more people are waking up

[@evolutionofyou5339]

@@carolinejohnson1249 Very true but. It must happen faster. We can. Keep Arguing with facts. We gotta move forward.

[@spiritbelieverspiritbeliev2612]

EXACTLY

[@judecarpenter2990]

To the narrator I'm so grateful of your ability to convey a message that as you said we don't fully understand the meaning of what life is really about but you make it sound so easy to explain thank you so much

[@Brmsg]

I remember when I was a child , it was difficult to understand why 2*2=4 , but 1*1=1 After learning addition where everything is clear 1+1=2, 2+2=4 . They say multiplication make it easier to work with big numbers, where one didn’t consider to be a number and was equal to 0 but when you multiply by 0 everything is 0 . Was mind blowing at the time .

[@Martina_Reiki]

Haha I remember, I was lost 1*1

[@johnplaysgames3120]

What a lot of people misunderstand about multiplication (either when they were a child or still, as adults, in a whole lot of the comments here) is the question that multiplication is answering. Because of its similarity to the way we use the word "multiply" outside of math -- like, "to make more" -- people think of mathematical multiplying like "cloning." They think "I have 1 apple and I clone it 1 time, now I have 2 apples." But, really, the question multiplication is answering is "How many instances of apple do you have right now?" If you're holding 1 apple, the answer to that question is 1. You have 1 apple, one time. 1x1. If you have 2 apples, you have 1 apple two times. 1x2. Etc. Terrence and the other folks arguing that 1x1=2 are misunderstanding the definition of the word "multiply" and are confusing it with a non-math phrase like "be fruitful and multiply." That's why they keep treating 1x1 as if it's saying 1+1. It's not.

[@patinho5589]

Multiplication is just adding lots of times.

[@patinho5589]

@@johnplaysgames3120yes. They are full of nonsense. I can’t believe this is getting traction.

[@ophiochus5079]

If you want to get your brain blown off completely do the following: give each vowel like AEIOUY a 1, and all other letters a 0, boiling each word down to binary like for example: Hi my name is = 01 01 0101 01, now apply multiplication of each number 🤓 as in binary 1=yes/light on/truth/fact and 0=no/light off/lie/fiction - now guess what the output of each word is, what the output of each sentence is, what tve output of each text, book, "law" is 😂 this disqualifies all laws, all contracts, all religions, basically the whole world 😉 have fun trying it for yourself ✌🏼🤓 yours truly a beeing recognised it's godlyness helping others do so 😊

[@monkeyking617]

This is really quite simple folks. When you have a multiplication problem, draw it out as a grid. You have your starting number on one axis, and the multiplier on the other axis. Now count how many squares you end up with, that is your answer. This is why the dimensions of a room are described as “square feet“. If you have a room that is 2 linear feet x 2 linear feet, make this into a grid and what do you get? 4 square feet. Now what if the room is 1‘ x 1‘? Look how many squares you have, you have “one square foot“. No, it is not intuitive, which means that your intuition should be questioned and there is learning required. What kind of an argument are you going to make that your intuition must be always correct, without instruction?

[@SlickArmor]

That's square feet of floor space. What about figuring out how many squares cubes will fill the room. Is that a cube problem?

[@Stan-lq9ud]

I think it's a stoned problem 😊​@SlickArmor

[@Stan-lq9ud]

Great hypothesis though. Fair fckn play! 👏👏👏

[@kittywampusdrums]

That's not multiplication

[@SlickArmor]

@@kittywampusdrums Yes, kitty it is.

[@bennbanes6359]

I miss Drunvalo so so much. Way back in 2010 helped me grow, helped me understand stuff that would formed my life that it is today. I am so happy with my life and my choices so far. Thanks to Drunvalo

[@bjscorpio4041]

He's got a new book coming out soon.

[@bennbanes6359]

@@bjscorpio4041 I really hope so. I heard he was pretty much alienated out of the public eye which is a shame. Folk need to rise above the haters, let them wallow in their self doubt and ego driven lives. These are the days. The days I have been waiting all my life for. Time to flip the table

[@TotalKarenage-vj4oc]

Why doesn’t hydrogen have 3 atoms preceding it? Cos Terry it’s the smallest possible atom with 1 electron and one proton. A smaller atom wouldn’t be an atom ffs

[@dejakju]

Yah, if a grown man doesn't get it why 1 x 1 = 1 i highly recommend basic math at school. Multiplication doesn't mean the product has to be more... then e.g. 4 x 0.5 = 2 must be breaking his world. That previous term literally divides by half by "doing multiplication". By the way, all basic math operations like subtraction, division and multiplication could be expressed as addition, which is the true hero of all and so natural even for toddlers.

[@belathewhite6173]

dude like wtf is going on ? is a hollywood actor really trying to tell people 1x1 should equal 2 ? have people lost their sense ?

[@lordgoogoo539]

It's the beginning of being told 2+2=5. All art created by people already in the system or past the velvet rope is predictive programming. It's the reason that things created by anonymous people is usually better quality because it comes from truth or put another way, someone closer to a common person like ourselves.

[@mosquitogiant7988]

If what you’re saying is correct then prove it with facts and calculations.

[@revolutionaryanimations560]

​@@mosquitogiant7988exactly. Wait a minute. Why did he structure it as 4 x 0.5? Why not focus on the fact that 0.5 is being multiplied by 4!!! Believe what you want my man but you have no proof that what he's saying is wrong

[@dejakju]

@@mosquitogiant7988 I can't help you if you don't get it, but yet still i'll try with a few examples: let's say you'll multiply 3 with 5. Another way to express that term is to say "3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3" (five times). You can (as a matter of fact) reverse it 5 x 3 = 5 + 5 + 5 (three times). Subtraction could be written like this: e.g. (+10) + ( -2 ) + ( -2 ) = +6.

[@Yes24232b]

I dont see anything weird. Just because the square root of 2 is the solution to the equation: 2x = X^3, does not mean that our math is broken. It means that the square root of two is the solution, i.e., the number that makes that statement true.

[@rawnukles]

yeah this is mumbo jumbo that sounds deep to people who don't understand maths and chemistry.

[@jamescrockett3968]

​@@rawnuklesI knew he was just spewing nonsense when he tried to say 1*1 =/= 1, but offered no alternative solution.

[@Mummymunmuggy]

This man uses cut out paper triangles to 'prove' how simple addition is wrong. With math skills like that, he should be a social scientist.

[@JoseGarcia-rw9im]

How is 1 times 1 …1 makes no sense when your adding multiplying a number means to add so how can one equal 1 ? U Dan also say 0 times 1 equals 0 well if your multiplying a number times 0 should equal that number like addition …10 plus 0 equal 10 because there’s nothing to add so 1 times 0 should be 1 not 1times 1

[@jamescrockett3968]

@@JoseGarcia-rw9im you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what multiplication is.

[@StanleyKubick1]

social media and 9gag literally ruined a whole generation's capacity for critical thought

[@dmorfeus3910]

@StanleyKubick1 Hear hear !!!

[@Enigma-t6n]

Even before social media & its minions pages, there's a generation that literally got rug pulled by any Tinfoil thought. It's just the loners & drop outs find something out of nothing to fill the void. & yeah Coke, lsd etc....never helps.

[@john.wick.111]

Everything he explains is fundementally true. Very few people have ascended to his level of awareness.

[@belovednurse4910]

N the majority never will because they do not comprehend the information itself. I knew all this just from watching quantum leap.

[@kickytink]

Buwahahaha~! Your'e hilarious 🤣

[@Rare_Creature_]

Seriously, I love Terrance Howard and this is AWESOME - power to the people

[@austinkuipers6087]

Walter Russell wrote a book about this a century ago called "the universal one" Literally this exact thing. A small minority of naturopaths have been using it's principles for decades (like Barre Lando), but they never get airtime and the maintstream calls them woo-peddlers whilst making billions off their toxic noncures. Kudos to Terrence for using his social capital to bring it into the light and elaborate on it.

[@hollisatlarge]

The Universal One is his bible and he actually used to carry it with him wherever he went. He’s following his instincts and he is passionate about where they are leading him. And I agree, he is the first one to bring Russell’s concepts to this broad an audience. Thanks Terrance!

[@1chuck23]

It was a good read. Inaccurate in a few ways, especially the predictions of assumed elements based solely on a octave basis, or everything that exists comes from light. But it's definitely like a nerd's Lord of the Rings type of read.

[@comdala]

In one of his books he says that he can prove how to transmute one element to other by using solenoid+electricty.

[@ShadowRulah]

He is 100% a woo peddler, you described some of the woo he peddles.

[@tenutoadagio7996]

This is the topic I talk to myself about in real world situations. I know I can achieve more in life but I haven't figured out how to apply My talents properly so I can contribute to society with what I'd like to create

[@simon-515]

Just do like this man start a new conspiracy theory and run with it. There's one born every minute.

[@FayIsa-g1h]

Start by reading. I recommend the Quran. There are fascinating and mind-boggling things, such as unknown knowledge that could only have been known through modern technology.

[@GuestingGameplays]

@@FayIsa-g1h and the Bible surely, theres nothing with more consistency than Scriptures as its stated “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17). And it having consistency and we receiving this conviction basically are already a mess for certain people, specifically the powerful and those who want to stay at error (for the sake of conformity, and believing in lies, lets be honest), its the undeniable, people misunderstand that we being limited and failing at certain things or rejecting certain others doesnt add or remove anything, it's still there and unchanged, definitely fascinating how the closer we get the further it feels haha! That's the relationship with God, and Jesus opened the gates and we got a lot of mind blowing knowledge def, like He Himself said ''Peace be with you!...''

[@peterdanyliw9506]

1x2=2 No one argues this. 1x1=1, meaning that one times ANY number equals that number, and there’s no secret about that. Oh the tales humans are capable of, know no ends.

[@conquistador1425]

Here is definite proof that pride is blinding! Anyone that cannot see how 1*1=1, is definitely blind!!! This is why humility is a necessity!!!

[@CynHicks]

It's one, one time which is obviously only one. Anyone that can't understand that is simply terrible with basic logical statements. It's fine that they are but like you wrote, some humility is needed here.

[@AnonCommenter-k5m]

if you have 1 of something and you 'multiply' that by 1, how can you possibly still only have 1?

[@Deffine]

@@AnonCommenter-k5m Bruh, math is a language of systems. If you multiply anything with 1, nothing changes.

[@benson8310]

​@@AnonCommenter-k5m let me simplify if you have one orange and i add another orange then i will have 2 oranges, thats called addition, if i take one orange and i multiply it by itself i remain with the same one orange

[@WIKUS70]

I am honestly open to new ways of thinking... so can someone explain to me what exactly this man is proposing? All I am getting is some snippets of layman terminology and some gesturing mixed with philosophy.

[@afrochica05]

Did anyone catch Terence say , " what I was instructed to do" 🤔 Who instructed him? Most of these concepts come through in dreams. Interesting.

[@Ttyronebigumms]

Wym??

[@cardoggcr]

I did, think he was referring to God.

[@mssavedin92]

I heard him say that. Dreams, downloads coming from someplace else.

[@coxmanbgg]

@@cardoggcr and what is god exactly? Where do our thoughts come from? What is holding the planets and all things "in place" (what is the matter surrounding everything)? Isn't that the same?

[@russcooke5671]

From the Akashic wavelength. Look it up. Fascinating

[@rafiekgideon]

We need a part 2 of this

[@HarpreetSingh-xg2zm]

*Part 1x1

[@BalanceWellnessCommunity]

last one, (min 13:05) Straight lines ARE possible. Just light a laser and don't disturb..

[@palacespot2]

Sometimes the cost is your life especially if it affects their money and power train

[@DrifterSpirit9]

Can you please explaine how this theory affects"their money" and the "power train"?Its a genuine question

[@reubroper1427]

@@DrifterSpirit9 that's the bit that gets me, yeah I understand people getting sucked in but the worrying about his life bit is hilarious, lets "pretend" his theory is correct, who would care in the slightest?

[@tggchat]

Because occultist thoughts are hidden

[@reubroper1427]

@@tggchat could you elaborate on how that comment has any connection to the subject? please don't hide your thoughts

[@GutoHernandes]

This video is a good analogy for an LLM. It sounds like human speech, it's made to sound like high level reasoning, but it's just words that form sentences that have no actual meaning or logic.

[@asdfds6752]

LLM hallucinating = Howard new theory! 🤣

[@CristianPopescu-ys1uf]

Is not an "unexpected result", is just that you and Terrence use a calculator to do it, because you are to scared by a sheet of paper. (((((sqrt(2)^3)/2)^3)/2)^3).... will always be equal with sqrt(2)^3, in fact you can do that with any number. Let's just use x as a number, so: sqrt(x)^2 = sqrt(x) * sqrt(x) = x sqrt(x)^3 = sqrt(x)^2 * sqrt(x) = x * sqrt(x) Now all you need to do is divide this by x and ^3 the result: ( x * sqrt(x) / x )^3 = sqrt(x)^3 So it doesn't matter how many times you do that, the result will be sqrt(x)^3 (((((sqrt(x)^3)/x)^3)/x)^3)..... = sqrt(x)^3 It's not a mystery and not a "loop", it's just that you two are only now discovering mathematics!

[@thequantumpathways10]

I love these topics, I am a science junkie

[@Twenty10sMedia]

that explains why I was lost in math!! Thanks Terrance! But, those are heavy signs! I pray for my guy! Stay strong Terrance!

[@orboan4686]

Look, I don't mean this offensively, God bless, but if you were lost in math class, don't look at this con artist throwing out super complicated "math" (buzzwords) for answers. Instead of complicating it, like he did to appeal to an audience that is more suceptable to people who sound informed in math, I will try and make the math simple. If you have 1 egg in every box you have, and you have 1 box, how many eggs do you have? One. Now, if you have 2 eggs in every box you have, and you have 2 boxes, how many eggs do you have? Four. He is trying to confuse multiplication with addition in a way, making you think 1 egg times 1 egg, which is actually just one egg plus one egg, not multiplication. For starters, debunk his claim where he said 4/2 equals 2 and the inverse is 2 times 2 equals four. That is correct, but he tried to use that to make the claim that if that is true, than 2/1 has the inverse 1 times 1 equals 2. He left out a very important fact, 2/1 equals 2. So, therefore, the true inverse of 2/1 is 1x2 equals 2. This is all silly stuff he's saying to sound relevant, don't buy into it. Listen to God, not man. The devil sends people to manipulate your mind into believing things that aren't true. I don't know why he's attacking math, but everything regarding Terrance should be viewed with HEAVY skepticism.

[@asgervends412]

NO it doesnt. your just bad at calculation and this example doesnt prove that math is wrong, it perfectly coexists with math as it is. Its just terrence and this dude talking nonsense

[@TheoByTheSeao]

This is totally idiotic, asinine, and illogical. The reason 1x1 is 1 is because of the word "times". Think about it this way: Instead of "two times two equals four", think: "Two, two times, equals four" It makes perfect sense. How many times do you have two in that equation? Two? Two times, or instances, of two, thus equals four. If you have two times seven (or the number two, occurring seven times), it's like having seven two's that you add together. Terrence is making a pedantic dispute based on the word "multiply", i.e., "how can you use the word multiply to apply to 1x1 when 1 isn't multiplying?", and that simply demonstrates that he (and everyone oohing and ahhing at his lack of understanding) does not understand how a multiplication function works. 1x1 = 1 because the equation is stating that you have one, one time. One instance of the number one. That's all multiplication is. One number is the number you are working with, while the other number is the quantity. It doesn't matter which number you use to work with vs quantity. You're multiplying the first number BY the value of the second number. 25x3. 25, 3 times. 25+25+25 = 75. 3, 25 times. I won't write all of them out...but friends, all 25 of those 3's equal 75. 1x1 = 1. The only reason "different mathematical operations on the same number can yield unexpected but consistent results" at 5:27 is true is because of the number 1. Take that root. 1.41etc. You are taking that number, 1.41 (I'll leave off the rest of the string for now to illustrate), and saying (in multiplying it by itself, or, squaring it), this number is going to occur 1.41 times. So you're going to basically add 1.41 to (1.41x.41). This will remain true for every decimal point you add on. the result of 1.41 + (1.41x.41) is 1.9881. The more decimal points you include, the closer you get to 2.

[@JodBronson]

I agree that 'equation' is not and never was perfect.

[@lotus8341]

This is why so many people failed at math because the logical mind instinctively understood 1 increased by the addition of a 1 EG 1x1, equaled 2 but the system was taught not to teach it that way so as to limit our scientific and liberating potential. Fact is 1 divided by 1 equals 1. 1 apple being given to 1 person so 1 multiplied by 1 has to expand to 2. 1 x 2 =3 . That’s the instinctive natural flow of logic that the system chose to deprogrammed our minds from following hence why most people disliked math than any other school subject. The teachings went against the natural grain

[@WiseAcres-i4d]

Or look at multiplication as groups. 4×2 is 4 groups of 2 objects added together... or vice versa with 2 groups of 4 objects added together. Making 1x1=1 because it's one group of a single object being added to nothing else. Same with zero. 0×1=0 because it's zero groups of any number of objects.

[@PeteReborn]

That's just redefining what the multiplication operator does. He says it's "add the number onto itself" whereas the rest of the world says "how many would you have if you had this many repeats?"

[@ydorri2460]

That's what I thought too

[@DarthCookieOW]

Yeah this guy is dumb as hell. Doesn't understand the first thing he's saying. The entire chemistry section of the video is stupid gibberish as well. I am a studied chemist and have never seen someone spout so much nonsense while pretending they know what they are talking about.

[@TrainerCTZ]

Well said. "How many would I have if I repeated 1 unit one time. I would have 1 unit." I appreciate his brain. I agree 100% regarding not death.

[@DCrypt1]

Yes but why do you think he felt the need to redifine the operation?

[@DarthCookieOW]

@@DCrypt1 because he's a stupid af conspiracy theorist.

[@alexanderkomarovsky9172]

Humanities greatest hope. Help us obiwan Howard , you’re our only hope !

[@outshine5411]

There’s people out there who are so desperate to believe that their mundane reality is more interesting then it is, they will believe anything

[@HUNKtm]

Exactly ! Just look real quick at the other videos of this channel to understand we are in a very weird "new age" trip here "free your vibrations", "regenerate your body", "the third eye" all these shits, like come on...

[@fu_games]

thats why i enjoy watching fantasy movies.

[@dictionplacement5467]

People get so locked up because life is so boring, just like the reasons stone age and egypt times people made up stories of gods and strange things they wanted to believe

[@Arkstromater]

​​@@dictionplacement5467knowledge....our curse...and our gift

[@blazayblazay8888]

SOMETHING CULT LEADERS KNOW ALL TOO WELL

[@LostSoulSearching]

When I was stationed in Japan, I was with the MPs. While going to school, I began studying quantum physics... they ridiculed, mocked, and belittled me. Guess who later attended the University of Carlos III Madrid working on a space engineering degree. Guess all of those men put more into drinking rather than understanding, learning, and a future of more.

[@VipersNest]

Who later attended the University of Carlos III Madrid to work on a space engineering program?

[@MrMadness574]

Guys. 1 x 1 means “One, one time”. If you have 1 only once you have just 1. 1 x 2 is 2 because you have “One, two times”.

[@PropertyBroker]

But doesn't explain how the square root of 2 = 1.41 and not 1 tho.

[@luckyLaserface]

​@@PropertyBrokerwhy should the square root of 2 be 1? That makes no sense.

[@chipsandbeer7083]

​@@luckyLaserface your mom in bed dosent make sense . but u have to live with it .

[@In-his-image]

Times comes from the term... to mulitply

[@wholesometomato]

1*1=1 means if you buy 1 Apple 1 time, you have a total of 1 Apple it’s not that difficult 😂

[@sherrizimmerman6369]

Exxellent. Some here just don't see the higher mind of his ... absolutely astounding! ❤ you go! Bring that higher vision! I get it!! ❤❤❤ Before most could not understand Quantum physics, now they are! ❤

[@beetlejuss]

Any number x1(a number times one) means you are NOT multiplying hence it does not "need to follow the same ratio". Same with Any number /1.

[@jcguitaristnyc]

Now I know why he was removed from Ironman 2

[@Dima319319]

The most secret kept from us is that we attract what we radiate and main thing we need to learn is how to see positive in every situation. Trues is always simple. I think moves like that designed just to keep our attention from what is really important for us.

[@PropertyBroker]

The law of attraction = we attract what we fear most. Otherwise everyone would be wealthy

[@whitebearmedicine9714]

Will this really matter during the current end of days. Time to get your mind, body and soul in line. 🙏🙏🙏

[@DerekCall-ug6rl]

I stand with Howard. Keep pushing. His passion alone is inspiring to me.

[@stephenbanks5952]

You are a fool.

[@YasAdele90]

If someone is this passionate about something. There’s something we need to be listening to

[@stephenbanks5952]

@@YasAdele90 No it doesn't work like that. That is how cults get started.

[@XeBeuse]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂​@@stephenbanks5952

[@valemerine3676]

PLEASE Stop the FLASHES! On this awesome video ! You have very impressive info to share ! Thank you ! 🎉

[@mukiibipeter07]

Thanks for saying that

[@keithempower]

The Thing is he can explain it in ways a (Non) Mathematician can even overstand... Which can be equated with how the laws of Physics..Zero Point Energy is concluded... Because I know for a Fact..that there are technologies out there that can pull Free Electrical Energy from the Atmosphere. I Think Terence is on to something..👍🏽👏🏽💯

[@Alifeofglory]

The flower of life encircles our Earth. I see it all the time... it's NO BIG DEAL. This video makes me laugh. 😂

[@jennifernessling9732]

I havr always been intrigued by Terrence Howard. He has always been interesting to me and now it is confirmed that there is way more under the surface with him. Dude is brilliant.

[@wrc1210]

Lol

[@Sweetescape82]

When I first watched Terrence’s meeting at the college I said to myself “This is exactly how i felt in elementary school when we were learning our times tables I never understood why everything times 1 was still 1 but I just memorized what they told us and did my work

[@cowabungask8r]

In “1 x 1” one of the 1’s is the item or quantity. You have one of something, say a firetruck. The other 1 is the “multiplicative identity” it’s just the count of how many times you repeat the firetruck. If you say “1 firetruck 1 time” that equals 1 firetruck. “Everything times 1 is still 1” is incorrect. Imagine 35 firetrucks, 1 time” (like 35 all lined up in 1 line) that’s 35 firetrucks.

[@ericzeigler8669]

Everything times 1 isn't still 1. 5 times 1 is 5. Early mathematicians and geometers had to discover concepts that seem "easy" to modern students. The objects like 0, 1, -1 and i are abstract mathematical objects that have "agreed upon" meanings assigned to them. Maths aren't invented. They're discovered.

[@khione8044]

Multiplication means: "___ groups of ____". 1×1 means: "1 group of 1". If you go to the grocery story, and you buy 1 item for $1, are you paying $1 or $2 for that item? Multiplying ×1 means that you are not increasing the number. It means there is only one group of that number. Let's say you open up your pockets. You find: Two $10 bills Three $5 bills and One $1 bill Is that one "$1" suddenly $2? Or is it still only $1?

[@jagmd]

Think of a bundles of sticks. Say, bundles of 5. If you have one bundle of sticks, how many sticks are there? That’s why. If you have zero bundles of sticks, zero sticks. If you have 2 bundles, 10 sticks.

[@Decksovi]

@jagmd 2 bundles of sticks.... means you DOUBLED OR MULTIPLIED it and that's what the man is saying.. 1 multiplied by another 1 is 2... 1+1=2... 1 multiplied by 1 = 2... 😮 i know it's crazy to a sane person 😂

[@thehousepainters3333]

1 x 1 = 1 Of course! Multiplication does not require the result to be bigger than the sum of the numbers multiplied. It's not addition, it's multiplication. 1 x 1 is the limit below which multiplication produces a result that is smaller than the numbers multiplied. 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25 ergo 1 half x 1 half = 1 quarter Not knowing 1 x 1 = 1 is not okay. It's primary school stuff

[@AndrewsArachnids]

Addition is the increase variable, multiplication is a factor of groups. _ x _ = _ really breaks down to this: think about the 1st number in a multiplication problem as a "group" of something, so you take that group of something and you count it a certain number of times. For instance 3x3 doesnt equal 9 because it's making more 3's to add together. 3x3=9 because in this instance you would be talking about three groups of three objects, counting all objects in each individual group totals 9. therefore 1 x 1 = 1 because you are taking 1 group of 1 and counting it 1 time.

[@PaulHoltslander]

🤕

[@yanmendesofficial]

What's the conclusion though? Everything we have been taught is approximately false? Math okay but what about the other things? How can we use this video to live a happier life?

[@c-hawkins4358]

Live a happier life.

[@lindseymckirdy1830]

It highlights the absurdity of our existence we are just indistinguishable from our surroundings and the universe The body is merely a vibrational tool which your consciousness (soul )controls - everything you interact with is internal (ie emanates from your consciousness) - I’m simplifying a bit as it’s quite difficult to explain with sounding like a fruitloop anyway Once you start to understand accept this you can start to break free from the control and manipulation you have been under.- I have not a clue about his mathematics but his theories appear plausible to me. Simply - given the correct circumstances you can alter the nature of matter.

[@runatrix]

false, square root of 2 multiplied by 2 it's the same as square root of 2 to the power of 3, due to square root rules. In math more than once different operations reach the same result: sqrt(2) 2 = sqrt(2) sqrt(4) = sqrt(2 * 4) = sqrt(8) sqrt(2)^3 - sqrt(2^3) = sqrt(2*2*2) = sqrt(8) => sqrt(2) 2 = sqrt(2)^3

[@justinsugay1149]

It calls into question our current technology and understanding of things. How much further can we go if we move past approximation and see the actual truth and more accurately can calculate things? It's a bit academic and hard to make clear but you ask a fundamentally sound question. I don't have a quick answer. It's like trying to explain wifi to someone who hasn't ever had it. Once they experience it they will understand how hard it is to not live with it and how helpful it is. Before then it's easy to say why the hell do I need to even think about this?

[@berthavegagalicia1276]

Everything it’s absurd on this video

[@hangfire5005]

Mental illness isn't always a naked guy trying to karate fight cars in the street. Sometimes it's a smooth intellectual sounding person explaining something to you that only they can understand and "They" want to keep you from knowing the truth.

[@asgervends412]

YESSSS THANKYOU. I thought the world was going bonkers, but finally i found a sane person a

[@SunnyCue-ew5ow]

Look up gang stalking organized stalking. Yea, some have lost their minds but many know its true power and hate. some can see how it's a facade behavior modification program.

[@RyanMcClure]

Preying on folks (like me) that were never strong at math is pretty low. But as a person who studied organic chemistry, I can label this confidently: bamboozel attempt, either deeply unethical or Messiah compmlex level mental derangement.

[@Radio_entelechy]

Yep. Bat shit crazy.

[@matthysuys9084]

What "truth" are you talking about? The truth that we don't understand quantum physics or that Terrence Howard doesn't understand the basics of math?

[@TotalKarenage-vj4oc]

5:32 all those mathematical functions were the same and Terry the calculator isn’t broken You are crazy!

[@evol2362]

Thinking that 1x1 can’t be real because the word multiplication mean to produce more is where everyone should pause and realize that some people just want to be extremely weird.

[@dafurious6457]

for real. all the math this guy did meant nothing lmao

[@sydanaguacielos]

I remember questioning 1x1 in school and I also remember being told that’s how it works, just memorize it.🤷

[@harleysmith1857]

Yes So many things just didn't seem right; so, I zoned out! Science class too ...teachers would explain 'how science works (for example atoms cells, evolution, & symbols) I would massively question it(vecause I saw it differently deeper amd multiple layers) and they never could really understand the depths of what I meant my explain it other than repetition! I thought I was dumb! Ihad no idea but I was on a whole other plain of understanding. I Grew up and had an awakening, saw scientific truth, I left church and everyday seek truth!

[@ADK_7]

​@@harleysmith1857I think your teacher just wants you to understand those concepts just for the exam and to pass And even he doesn't understand that on a deeper level 😂 Keep manifesting in life 👍🏻

[@arturzathas499]

1 of 1 is 1

[@Grevlor]

He lists associaticity and commutativity as one thing, and describes something else entirely. He claims that our usual arithmetic operations don't work then uses them in a direct "proof", not one which seeks to establish a contradiction

[@trinitrotoluene3D]

@@arturzathas499 I had high thoughts of Terrence but now I think he’s on coke the whole video, this man hasn’t shown us a written-out proof because every proof has assumptions (postulates) and when he says all our assumptions are wrong, he has nothing to work with other than his computer app. No doubt the OpenGL engineers or whatever his app was based on assumed 1 of 1 is 1 in order for things to function

[@johnchase2148]

Free will and free to think.. I stand with you.

[@jpro112185]

@15:44 it's basically the eifle tower. That wasn't made just to be a sculpture. It's a giant antenna or something. Yes i know the tower has 4 legs and could be coincidence but I think it was created for other( secret) purposes.

[@amotzbarakben-israel2691]

my 7th grade math teacher told me i was incorrectly understanding the number of the counter of 1;- ...that was in the year of 1969 - since i was an already a Ritalin Baby, and challenging my teacher for fifteen minutes,- i began to 'hate' mathematics

[@jenifernadeau]

Yes..pills are designed to harm humans with side effects & provide a false quick fix. Everything is illusion .it's the parents that weren't honoring their exquisite light being hypersensitive Empathic child that's sensitive to the dysfunctional energies in the home.. they need the child to comply with the covert toxicity..😢 So they drug em up..I worked for child psychologists and psychiatrists..horrifying and twisted

[@johnlombardo7816]

Ritalin back then? Oh dang, didn't know it's been going on that long.. smh. Sad

[@Shivaho]

My God My Dad was a Dr & I was born in 1960 & I had a Pencil Holder Shaped like a Humanoid with a Big Smile & its head cut off & I distinctly remember it said Ritalin on it. It was one of those Big Pharma Perks they leave Drs to get them to prescribe the new meds they are pushing. I don't remember him giving it to me though because he had his own unique way to keep me docile...

[@Cullercecks]

2 divided by 1 is 2, so 2 times 1 is 2. No mystery. When the factor is one ore below, multiplying is not getting more. No mystery

[@AmadeuShinChan]

I agree, it‘s the exception where „x“ equals „:“. Like when a man and a woman make a baby 1+1=3.

[@outlawedTV88]

How much is 2 multiplied with zero? or divided with 0 ?

[@AmadeuShinChan]

@@outlawedTV88 the same as any other number, that is multiplied or divided by zero, zero.

[@outlawedTV88]

@@AmadeuShinChan Nope. You see it cannot be zero. This is why all math is wrong by a design. To brainwash us all and present us with false reality. First you must learn, if you want that is, that in nature zero do not exist. To simplify more - You hold in your hand one apple. Now divide it or multiply it with zero the outcome will be always the same. You will always have that one apple in your hand safely. No zero division can take it away from you. Do you get it now? You're welcome! Periodic table that they talk about here presented to the public is a fake one. The real one created by Mendeleev is hidden away 100 y ago. So humanity will never learn the truth

[@outlawedTV88]

@@AmadeuShinChan do you see my reply to you or YT deleted my comment again?