How The World SOUNDS To Animals

[@garrenbrooks4778]

This is crazy. To think I've lived 32 years without ever realizing that dogs constantly hear a piano playing in their heads.

[@Sushbearious]

😆

[@wildchildliving]

😂😂

[@budakbaongsiah]

THEY GOT BGMs PLAYING FOR THEM AUTOMATICALLY!? HOW CAN WE EVOLVE TO SUCH A GRAND BEING!?

[@antugino136]

LOL right a piano and a xylophone.

[@Noah-ig2qc]

lmao

[@Raelven]

I had a Dachshund who went blind. He could find his way from across the street, through the yard, right to the back yard gate. He'd take a few steps, tilt his head, reorient himself, take more steps, repeating the process. One day the two water fountains in the front and side yards were not running. Instead of finding his way, he walked in circles, completely lost and confused. I realized then, *he used the sound of the fountains to triangulate his path to the gate.* My mind is still blown by watching this little dog do more complicated math, in his head, than I can without a calculator.

[@Aaron628318]

In a sense this is the audio equivalent of vision - using reflections of ambient noise. I understand that submarines use this 'passive sonar' to remain incognito.

[@foxboy64]

your dog isnt really doing math, thats not how the instinctual perception of space and proprioception works. there's technically math going into you being able to catch a ball without looking at your hand the whole way, but you're not doing calculations like you would do with trigonometry. you just kind of instinctually know where your hand is and how far you have to move it to catch the ball. as someone whos vision impaired (not blind but i certainly dont see as well as everyone else, even corrected), i do the same sort of thing all the time. mostly in online gaming, the spatial perception of sound really helps fill in the gaps my sight leaves out. say for instance in a shooter, with a few turns of the "characters head" (looking left and right, kinda the equivalent of a dog head tilt.) i can work out almost exactly where in space a set of footsteps is coming from. i do this in real life as well when trying to pinpoint a sound i cant see. so i found Benn's mention that humans dont do the head tilt kind of funny, because i certainly do it. anyway the point is, im not calculating any numbers in my head to work that out. its just a passive skill you pick up when your other senses have to compensate for bad sight. its like how your eyes have to coordinate to both look at the same object in order to perceive its 3d space, but with your ears instead.

[@CatwithFancyHat]

​@@foxboy64 Well Benn was probably talking about humans without vision impairment, he only said we aren't born with this ability. But as you said, we can certainly develop it to compensate for something damaged in our perception, but evolution never felt the need to give us an instinct from birth that makes our head tilt to compensate for a lack of "3D hearing" (can't come up with a better word).

[@Cola.Cube.]

@@foxboy64 I also find it amazing that your hearing is the first sense to develope in the womb and the last sense to stop working at time of death. I've always considered my hearing more important than my sight. I'm a musician, so that probably has a lot to do with it.

[@Raelven]

@@foxboy64 Awesome explanation, thank you! I know he wasn't really calculating, but he was so smart, it wouldn't shock me. I am sure he outsmarted me, many times. Again, thanks for the clarification, I appreciate your time and have a better understanding. 👍

[@DemonKing19951]

I won't lie, the slowed down bird calls really makes me wonder how advanced their languages actually are. What sounds like to us almost identical sounds all had a slightly different pitch like they were their own words. Wonder what we'll find out about orca in the coming years.

[@Vik1919]

Yeah, that was scary.

[@mirandapanda5439]

This is all speculation... not definitive

[@n9315]

@@mirandapanda5439 all theories start out as speculation so what is your point?

[@newp0rt]

@@mirandapanda5439 "its all speculation" 🤓 stfu

[@lizardtenticlez4000]

I listened to birds on mushrooms and can confirm they communicate the same way we interpret music

[@communismenjoyer-mx7yo]

A note about flies: they also sense changes in air pressure extremely well which is why a lattice-like object that allows air to flow through it, such as a swatter, can reliably hit flies when swung fast but a solid, flat object like an open palm is telegraphed from a fly-mile away. coincidentally an object moving slower creates less of a disturbance in air pressure.

[@user-cf2oz5rw6b]

wow so the holes on a swatter is intentional

[@Groveideer]

@@user-cf2oz5rw6b They make sense without knowing this as well, because the holes allow the swatter to move faster because of the same reason, its more aerodynamic; it does not have to move the air out of the way to reach its target as the air flows through it.

[@RestitutorEuropa]

I’m sure it also helps that they have like a 100 eyes

[@Assimandeli]

@@RestitutorEuropa They have only two eyes, but they are compound eyes.

[@Lion-O-Richie2040]

I kill flies with paper, books all the time. Even my hand.. If what you said mattered, I wouldn’t have a long list of dead flies under my belt. I have even THROWN a book and killed one before. Clearly doesn’t telegraph good enough.

[@siegfriedo]

Humans can change time perception too. For instance under extremely stressful and/or life threatening conditions. I have experienced this personally. I have been in a car accident years ago, skidded on a side of the curved road and crashed into a tree with the drivers side door (I was driving). I can remember to this day how my time perception had extremely slowed down to the point where I could see the tree approaching, then slowly making contact with the car door, the door slowly bending around the three, the glass shattering into hundreds of tiny pieces and flying towards me, all that as if I was watching video footage that was slowed down tens of times and at the same time the resolution and detail was extremely enhanced. The crash took a second or two but it felt like time almost stopped at that particular moment. Will never forget it.

[@j.vdubois5074]

Actually there was a research for this involving blindfolded people doing backwards bungee jump. The result was that they did not experience time dilatation. But they formed a lot more memories, being able to recall details that would have been normally discarded. The reverse happens in prison solitude - while it is extremely bad at the time, prisoners later recollected as if months passed as days. Of course if there are no interesting things happening around you, all days blend into each other.

[@newp0rt]

same reason why people think your life flashes before you when you die.

[@captainzeroskill2289]

Dude. I've been hit by a red light running car when i was in food delivery on a scooter. I clearly remember i saw my precious yamaha spinning and flipping slowly on the road while i was sliding on my head (in a helmet) and i had time to think about what i'll need to repair. The whole accident felt much slower after the inpact. Luckily i only hurt one of my legs and not too badly. Allways wear your protective gear on two wheels guys.. a slow ride on a small bike doesn't mean safety!

[@praudery6249]

Sadly intersting

[@Ima-si4kd]

Omg the same has happend to me! Its so intresting

[@bodvarson1933]

This just means that our dog friends get to enjoy more time with us in their own eyes.

[@virtual_vanitas]

It's also why it seems like we are gone for so long when we step out or go to work.

[@SSukram_]

@@virtual_vanitas but they've been used to that time for their entire life, wouldn't they just think it's normal?

[@whosechannelisthis]

@@SSukram_ yes

[@Deezsirrer]

Do people enjoy sitting on hospital for 6 hours? No! Why would the dog do.

[@zero.Identity]

i now know why dog years exist

[@jaimelovemac88]

9:00 him giving his duck little scratches while it laid on it's back and kicked it's little webbed feet was the cutest thing I've seen all week! Adorable!!! 🦆🦆🦆💛💛💛

[@Kylo27]

Ducks are incredibly loving pets. We had lap ducks as kids and they would come up to you for scratches/hugs whenever we went outside.

[@heavnxbound]

@@Kylo27 A duck at the beach bit my dad’s toe when he was trying to give it bread 😂

[@jaimelovemac88]

@@heavnxbound I too was chased after by a bunch of ducks. Scared the Hell outta me!!!

[@lizamay722]

I love it so much. They make complete bonds and sometimes imprint, and they're great domesticated pets imo

[@Hubson55]

Great! Now I want to have a duck.... 😤

09:01 duck tummy rubbing ... OMG so cute :D that shot is a hidden gem

[@manaash4316]

My life is now complete 🥰

[@StevenIngram]

Wow. I always thought that, just due to size difference and movement speeds, that dogs would perceive us as slow lumbering giants. But I had no idea how true that was. :D

[@NotTodaySatan557]

Lumbering giants 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@-S.F.K.]

I always found this very annoying. Other animals have different speeds of processing information. This means that someone that is more exiting to us, may seem more slow and dull to say a dog. This doesn’t mean that other animals quite literally see the world in a slow motion kind of way. If it did, no matter what weird science thing you did will always have a delayed reaction. And you can see with other animals that they do not. To a dog, time feel like it’s going slower, but doesn’t actually look and sound like it’s going slower. It like when you’re bored.

[@colorfulchameleon9891]

@@-S.F.K. Thanks for this. It is indeed a really annoying misunderstanding.

[@-S.F.K.]

@@colorfulchameleon9891 glad you agree

[@paulbedichek5177]

Yeah,but my Chiwawa Terrier mix,Eddie,can't reliably catch hamburger when I throw it to him, if time is slowed down for him, he should.

[@scotttruehart8024]

What I found interesting is that the bird sounds sounded like what movies use for dinosaur sounds.

[@MayimHastings]

Totally! They are, after all, little raptors!

[@jukesngambits]

They literally do use a blend of real animal calls (including birds) and just slow it down. That's how they made those sounds

[@amyblueskyirl16]

Why do birds sound so much more melodic to us?

[@pondboy3682]

@@amyblueskyirl16 really, most don't. They chirp or caw and it's not that melodic at all. I was wishing he'd give us a better song bird example, though! That would have been neat!

[@makayladorvil1542]

I thought that too

[@The..Dark..Knight]

This totally makes sense of why dogs react when we speak to them in that high pitched sing-songy voice we all do. To them it sounds like a normal excited voice with our usual voice dipping so low in octave. Also why hearing very high pitch is easier for them as it's brought to a significantly lower frequency in their ears. Very intriguing.

[@hugdablok6162]

I never used that voice with my dog.

[@The..Dark..Knight]

@@hugdablok6162 Poor dog. Lol

[@spookyblush-speedruns]

@@hugdablok6162 D O U B T

[@anatorres-ym8ke]

that explains why women are better with animals...the voice of a woman is sweet to their ears

[@munkeyinspace5331]

Somehow I feel like this isn’t entirely accurate 🤷‍♂️

[@ryanlockhart9102]

Slowed down bird calls are so beautiful! I find that when I'm around birds and sing or play an instrument, a lot of the time the birds seem to be listening. They must be hearing something so much prettier than me or anyone else!

[@localcompanion]

The bird songs are what I believe is the closest we will ever get to potentially hearing dinosaur calls. The slowed and deepened frequency, along with the fact these animals evolved from dinosaurs, really makes me think a bunch of slowed bird calls would be like taking a step back over a hundred million years ago!

[@catoftruth1044]

Imagine a Dinosaur that can talk like a parrot that can copy human talking

[@naturegreene9579]

Lol kinda funny, but imagine is a trex 😮 now it's kinda creepy lol

[@AzillaKiami]

@@catoftruth1044 Now thats an interesting thing to think about. If dinosaurs had the ability to mimic, it would be an extremely helpful hunting trait, since they could bait prey to them, and trick them.

[@Knapweed]

The last words you hear before you're eaten are, "WHO's A PRETTY BOY?"

[@SavagelyBadAtLosing]

Scientists have already released what they think dinosaurs sounded like. They made a combination of bird and alligator noises slowed way down. Sounds really bad ass!

[@chrisandrew7577]

When I was a kid I remember telling my mom I thought squirres experienced time differently She thought I was crazy

[@doodlehq7722]

you mean squirrels?

[@BadlyDrawnTrollFace]

@@doodlehq7722 minor spelling mistake😮😮😮😮😮

[@kells8015]

Kids know stuff we don't I swear

[@cheyenneamc]

It’s cause the movie Over the Hedge 😂

[@RBUKFAN]

You are

[@CaleanWsh]

Wow... I seriously didn't think that other species lived TIME differently that me. This was quite and "eye-opening" experience! Thank you :)

[@-S.F.K.]

I always found this very annoying. Other animals have different speeds of processing information. This means that someone that is more exiting to us, may seem more slow and dull to say a dog. This doesn’t mean that other animals quite literally see the world in a slow motion kind of way. If it did, no matter what weird science thing you did will always have a delayed reaction. And you can see with other animals that they do not. To a dog, time feel like it’s going slower, but doesn’t actually look and sound like it’s going slower. It like when you’re bored.

[@KibyNykraft]

@@-S.F.K. The whole claim you guys mention here from the video is a highly repeated myth among the public, especially those who still don't understand or even read good old Albert E' and his relativity clarifications. And one of the most frequent things to see is people also mentioning AE without having checked or managed to understand his work (of course it has a few quirks but no major things). The perception organisms have is of *motion* ,not of time, as we have relative motions. E= MC squared. Time is the way we register the reduction of distances between what is in always present motion. Each moving locality is only in a speed relative to what you compare to. The only exception here is a semi-particle moving at C, called a photon, and that is why it is a semi-particle and not a regular mass particle. (Luminosity = high energy particles reaching your eyes) So time in real physics = the reduction of distance. That's it. It is how to define that you proved motion to occur. Or like some will say a measuring concept. There is no time "on top of" motion in an existential fashion.

[@SeptemberMeadows]

What was the CFF of the Predator in the first Predator movie 🤔

[@CaleanWsh]

@@SeptemberMeadows I don't even know what you're saying...??

[@SeptemberMeadows]

@@CaleanWsh If you know, you know 😉🤭

[@v4riab1lity77]

12:34 with the amount of times I’ve rewinded just to be able to process everything he’s saying, seemingly so quickly, has helped me to understand one thing: I am slow.

[@robinmeader5585]

Ha! Me too.

[@alomtz4359]

Same here

[@robincrow6436]

Mmmmmeeeeeee ttttttttoooooooooo

[@LocalBosnian-99]

Not me

[@adye88]

I think the reason that we don't hear noises so well above and below us is because of our size in our environment. Our threats don't come from above or below but from right in front of us or behind of us. If our main appendages were wings or we were smaller relative to our environment, things might be different.

[@Yes_Anastasia]

Eh, I might argue that threats to us can most certainly come from above us.

[@adye88]

@@Yes_Anastasia give us another 1000 years and we'll have the means to detect and deter threats from above too. Even today an example includes missle/air defense systems. We've kinda adapted already if you think about it.

[@funkyfranx]

@@adye88 I don't see why we would evolve to have that when humans no longer live in a world of predatory threats. The only thing we have to fear are other humans, and they don't often attack from above. A thousand years is far too little time as well, we're not more evolved than people living in the medieval era

[@OrangeTtop]

So is it rare to be able to tell? I never have issues

[@Torpax_]

Our eyes are for front and vertical threats. Ears specialize in protecting our flanks. Brains specialize in making sure we don't get snuck up on from behind through systematic exploration methods. We aren't gonna physically evolve any further since civilization developed, bc we live on the equivalent of peaceful mode in Minecraft and only really have to worry about griefers lmao

[@Sans_The_Skeleton]

I always thought “I wonder how this thing sees the world” but never “I wonder how this thing hears things” I just assumed every animal just heard sounds the same speed but louder or quieter than other animals

[@ShwappaJ]

I just wanna know how skeletons can hear tbh

[@Амин-т4х]

​@@ShwappaJthey can't

[@NickHaus683]

@@ShwappaJExplain the joke

[@eliasniewerth]

Its propably because we usually only talk about vision. It is by far the most used sense that we have. Without vision we lose about 80% of our perception. For this dog it might not have been nearly as mindblowing as for you

[@ShwappaJ]

@@Амин-т4х r/whoosh

[@The8BitGuy]

I'm not convinced that the frequency of sound would be different to dogs or other animals. Unlike computers, we actually have different parts of our cochleas that are sensitive to different frequencies. So I think the pitch of our voices would remain the same for dogs, but it would just seem that we're talking more slowly.

[@JohnZ-]

It’s more that his editing program deepens the pitch when the video clip is slowed down

[@yosefmacgruber1920]

@@JohnZ- Strangely, due to digital sound processing, playback speed can be changed independently of frequency. Even some digital answering machines can do this. It seemed like he reduced the pitch of his voice, more so than any slowdown of playback speed could have accounted for? Like maybe sound-editing on a computer.

[@Stinckyfatmama]

And since they don’t understand English, you could use some ai software to giberize the audio so the tone and cadence are the same but it’s just essentially unintelligible.

[@ChristopherWoods]

I believe the reality is that dogs (and other animals) will actually hear a wider sound spectrum with a different frequency bias (see the Fletcher Munson Curve); the perceived loudness of human speech for example may not be as prominent, though they have become attuned to human speech through evolution and breeding. Dogs interpret pitch and intonation and have been demonstrated to read human faces for cues. No doubt that their temporal resolution and reaction times are vastly superior though, much like cats. My understanding of human temporal resolution is that it's actually more nuanced than just saying it rolls off at 60 Hz; I can clearly see the difference between 60 and 90/100 Hz for example. Above that, at least on my high refresh monitor, I can't reliably test due to the inherent limitations of IPS panels. But I can absolutely see at a faster refresh than 60 Hz. Whether my brain is able to react as fast is another matter, largely dependent on attentiveness and whatever is occupying active thought processes (e.g. how talking on a phone while driving or focusing on a satnav reduces spatial awareness).

[@yosefmacgruber1920]

​@@ChristopherWoods Wouldn't dogs become attuned to human speech because they like us and due to familiarity? We humans probably smell funny and talk funny, but they do not much care about that, because they like us. I have long wanted to write a modern GUI OS for my first computer, my Apple //e, that I bought in 1985. I have estimated that in its highest resolution, double-high-resolution graphics, if I could straight copy from memory, at just 1 MHz CPU, I could only get about 5 frames per second, faster if I only have to redraw a smaller portion of the screen. That is because the loop cycle time uses about 12 clock cycles, and an entire 16K block of RAM data has to be copied to the video RAM buffer again and again. Back in the day, that would have been almost enough to do a 3-D game, if I could somehow approach that in my game. It wouldn't be too terribly bad for scrolling a stylized text screen. Not quite the "instant" response of modern computers, but a mere fifth of a second. And repeat arrow keys hold-down or presses could be combined into greater-distance scrolls so as to keep up. Certainly a calm game like _Myst_ could work with such a low frame rate. But if I only wanted to make the screen flash, I could maybe boost it to 6 or 7 frames a second, since I wouldn't have to load new data into the CPU's registers. Or it could be much faster by switching to a lower-resolution screen. It wasn't that long ago that 24 frames a second for film in the movie theater, was plenty fast. Maybe the flicker is noticeable, but still motion appears to be motion.

[@swordmonkey6635]

I'd always assumed a cat's perception of time was slow-motion (compared to ours) and that's why they were so good at doing dexterous stuff... and why they needed to sleep so much (lots of information to process). Interesting that I was completely wrong.

[@TheAsylumCat]

We must seem terrifying to watch moving around

[@o00nemesis00o]

@@TheAsylumCat Eh, watch a Harold Lloyd movie. After a while you get used to it.

[@petrkinkal1509]

It's a bit tricky for example cat reaction time is faster than ours.

[@GiRR007]

Their perception of time may be slower but their reaction time is still faster.

[@pong9000]

Cats do seem to observe the general behaviour of something before making a move. Why they never strike a toy on the first pass.

[@kittervision]

I'm a vet tech I'm fascinated by this..... Always doing my best to understand animals and do better at communicating with them .

[@ThattechniciangirlB]

I am also one! Thank you for all you do! I’m really wondering how 100% this is, although super interesting and sounds like it’s spot on, but I wonder how can we REALLY know what they hear unless we were actually them?

[@Peacefrogg]

@@ThattechniciangirlB nope. But i also can never know how you percieve the world. Do you see colours or hear sounds the same way i do? I have no idea. It’s all just guesswork. I also wonder if and how animals can ‘see’ smells.

[@sullyschwartz2365]

@@Peacefrogg You'd see if sense of smell is tied to visual in the brain; That's how we know taste is affected by smell for us.

[@sullyschwartz2365]

@@ThattechniciangirlB That question is more philosophical as it can apply to anyone or thing; One of the most important and renowned historical questions in philosophy is 'what's it like to be a crow?' Which brings into mind the concept of consciousness itself-what if certain colors *seen* weren't *recognized* by the brain of an animal? Would it think on such colors? Or only the colors of prey it's evolved to hunt? Also, to answer your honestly simple question: You can tell by the structure of their fucking eyes and the neurological structure of their brain. Same with ears. And nose. That's how we KNOW dogs truly feel and have developed parts of the brain necessary to feel a bond of love with humans. What I want to know is: Why do people ask such questions without putting any much effort into it? Most of these I've learned simply through feeds of published studies; I'm guessing yours consist of Facebook posts and tiktok trends? Treat yourself as good, if not better than your animals-you're a species of your own and should be just as strong; physically and mentally. Peace n love

[@Peacefrogg]

@@sullyschwartz2365 i get that. So if animals could really see smells the visual section in their brain would light up. But i don’t think it’s that simple. If smells could construct a kind of map in the brain in a similar way that sight can, i don’t think it’s necessary for the same section of the brain to be active. At the same time you and i can both see the colour blue, identify it as blue, have the same parts of our brain be active as we see it, but still not be certain whether we see it the same way.

[@LMJr88]

The biggest surprise is that a simple question, “What does the world sound like to a dog?” Involves covering such a wide range of topics to fully answer. Amazing.

[@maidenminnesota1]

And it took so damned long to get there that I lost interest. Moving on...

[@Emily-8914]

Even the simplest of questions can lead to the deepest of rabbit holes.

[@ProfessorShnacktime]

@@maidenminnesota1 dude seems to love to listen to himself speak.

[@RetroCube]

@@maidenminnesota1 Your attention span is so low that you didn’t even notice the time stamps on the video to skip past the science of it to the actual stuff. This has gotta be a new level of laziness christ

[@LMJr88]

@@Emily-8914 indeed!

[@parkervarin]

Science, psychology, music, nature, telling others about the majesty of it all and doing it well. This is such an exceptionally well made video. I could watch this extended to 90 minutes. It's so good. You've got all these animals and land and sound equipment and a KZbin channel and scientific papers and just from this video it seems like you might be living my dream life. Keep up the awesome work.

[@itzlai4736]

It’s so cool how much the birds sound like “dinosaurs” or what we think of as dinosaur noises, considering how closely related they are

[@noitnettaattention]

Aaandd there goes the Darwinian INSANITY!

[@uddie2416]

@@noitnettaattention what

[@noitnettaattention]

@@uddie2416 ...ehhm, nothing much, just make some bird noises to estabilish dinosaur "relations"...Ohh and dont forget to call it a "science" in the end...

[@uddie2416]

@@noitnettaattention mate what r u on abt

[@Red-jl1qr]

@@noitnettaattention what are you a creationist lmao

[@myrmidonmamori]

The whole "time is relative" thing is so hard to wrap my head around, but I'm always seeing new bewildering evidence that the speed at which time flows isn't always the same.

[@LilyUnicorn]

Time flows the same no matter what. Too many people confuse spacetime as some magical sci fi concept. Spacetime is actually just space at a certain event. Time always moves forward. Time is an event and does not change that event point. How you see something (known as your perception of time) is what they mean. Think of a bird who can see the spectrums (rgb and uv). Us who can see rgb. And cats/dogs who can see green and blue spectrum but not red. Now think of an orange ball with uv markings on it. Bird can see orange and uv. Humans can see only orange. Dogs/spectrum cant see red spectrum and orange is about 45% or more red spectrum with 20 to 40% green spectrum and 0 to 10 ish% spectrum. To them it will appear like a desaturated bluish green/yellow. But has the ball changed? NO. It has not. It is still the same. We simply just dont see it the same way. Time is the same. Time does not miraculousy pull magic. This is not a hard concept. Just normal people who misinterpreted what einsteins spacetime means. While time may feel slower or faster from your viewpoint, time itself does not change. Event A has always happened at Event A. Think of an obese and a fit person running at the same pace... tied together with the same leash. Footsteps in sync. Obese person may feel like everything is taking forever as it is basically dragged around by fit person. Fit person may feel relaxed, slow paced but as if time runs quickly. Perception is mental. It is not reality. The reality of a time event should not be conflated with imaginary perception. Its created this massive misunderstanding of time and spacetime as some sort of gidly hocus pocus that is far simpler than you think.

[@Lithane97]

@@LilyUnicorn no, there's plenty of scientific theories devoted to the idea that time flows forward and backwards. Or others that suggest time is not directional and is occurring simultaneously.

[@LetsPlayGamesRandom]

@@Lithane97 time isnt anything but a human made concept. All there is is particles that move and that we perceive . You cant go back in time because those events have happend. Even if you travel faster than light, the world will seem slow around you but you cant reverse events that have already taken place.

[@zeitxgeist]

Your experience of time relative to others is what changes, not time itself or your own experience of time; if you were travelling 100ly at C, you would experience 100 years, but for people on Earth whose experience of time is influenced by the Earth's conditions and gravity and all that hoohaa have a different perspective: if you were to return, you'd return a number of years I'm too lazy to whip out a calculator for, but a lot, but you would have only experienced 200 years to have passed on this hypothetical trip.

[@sexgod57able]

The Quickening you fools. Bwuhahahaha!!!!

[@grrggrrg4805]

Vsauce Michael actually said that's his process for making videos too. He said he might take a question like "which way is up?" and make that an excuse for making a video about how gravity works. I'm loving your recent output, Benn, keep it up.

[@aiyhavnouneim]

vsussy

[@pong9000]

A more disarming question is: "How do we know left from right?"

[@Juisapey]

I'm dying 😭😭 12:18 The little elephant scratching his eye is too cute 😭😭

[@morganc.m1830]

Me too!

[@bandwagon240]

I hope you feel better.

[@nari5161]

I have a degree in neuroscience & physiology and have studied animal physiology, and have never heard an insects' lungless respiratory system referred to as a consequence of their flicker fusion frequency. This feels like when I accidentally wound up in computational neurobiology as a sophomore with senior engineers who were being given an intro to neuro in the hopes of working on the computing side of medical research, and me chiming in with my accurate but slightly different physiological perspective of only two years into neuro. I love and live for interdisciplinary work and am jiving with this content.

[@danpowell3953]

I don’t think their respiratory system is necessarily a consequence of their flicker fusion frequency. They may have evolved independently or are both the consequence of a high metabolism and avoidance of danger. I do appreciate your love of multi-disciplinary investigations though.

[@v4riab1lity77]

All work should be interdisciplinary I think… I fucking hate specialization as I view it as a critical failure point for any civilization, and a cause for a huge load of our modern day issues. Because people in one field know jack shit about anything in ANY others. Fundamental education should be rounded and generalized, only slightly ellipsing the further into your education you get. Right now? Just nothing but strings. All getting tangled and wrestling eachother barbarically

[@Marzimus]

I picked up half of what you put down.. 😂

[@kepspark3362]

​@@v4riab1lity77 I agree.

[@doggoadexx2680]

Jfc I don’t understand anything ur saying

[@Killer01K]

The problem with this video is that is too short, and we don't have enough time to appreciate how good he is.

[@BennJordan]

The real time perception is in how long it took me to get some of those 1000fps shots lol

[@DontFeedTheDrummer]

You can always play the video at 0.5x speed

[@JanetStarChild]

I don't understand why so many viewers on KZbin want very long videos; like as if many of us don't have things to do throughout the day and a finite amount of time. 15 minutes is enough time to cover a topic like the one we just watched. I'd rather watch a short, concise video than a bloated, longwinded video that has been artificially lengthened. Frankly, it's the reason I prefer John Michael Godier over Isaac Arthur.

[@mathmanmrt]

@@BennJordan i enjoyed this greatly but it still left me hungry for more, especially as regards the perceptions of reptiles. in all honesty i have a selfish reason in that i'd love to know more about how my friendly ball python, bob, perceives the world around him. i know that he probably exists in a chemosensory world through his incredibly engineered olfactory system but what of his sight and hearing? ah, well. some day i'll find out, or not. in the meantime, thanks for your excellent videos.

[@kfl611]

I agree I was just getting into it and it was over. What did the sea algae 'see'?

[@jonsen2k]

We do in fact hear whether a sound comes from behind or in front of us, and I would assume also up or down. It’s the reason why our ears are ear shaped. It reflects and channels the sound just slightly differently depending on the direction it comes from, so as we grow up our brain will fine tune its guess to where the sound is from. Steve Mould has a great demonstration on how messing with the ear shape will totally mess with your ability to track sounds.

[@DannyGruesome]

Yes. Things directly in front of you are heard better than sounds coming from the left or right even.

[@Dayanto]

​@@DannyGruesome Sure, but you could do that even with just earholes based on the difference in timing and volume since one ear is closer than the other. That doesn't work when the sound is coming from above, below, in front of, or behind you since they have the same distance to both ears. It's literally impossible to tell the difference without some kind of special ear shape that can _create_ a difference in the reflected sound.

[@Bob-of-Zoid]

Binaural recording mimics the human head! It's near full 3D with only regular headphones, sans physical shaking of floors and other objects. It's not just the ears, but the whole head and even mechanical waves transferred through materials we are in contact with, and how the brain extrapolates distance and direction from all of it in processing. From what I heard the reason some of us can't tell direction well and what not, is because with all of the modern amenities, we don't have to be all that alert all the time, and many of us just don't use our senses to the best of our abilities. People can learn how to hone their senses though. I also wouldn't be surprised if many pets are also operating on diminished capacity.

[@SaebriSelect]

but the only difference between a sound in front or behind is the decibels. the same sound would be only louder in front of you. i could play the same sound, but you would want to say its in front if its louder. so its kind of a stretch to say we can actually hear a sound from infront of you versus behind you. its really just a guess. so calling a 'guess' or a 'feeling' as 'fact' is kinda hardcore lol. u also cant tell if a sound is above or below you, is why a lot of people get confused in video games about vertical audio, thats because there is no such thing as vertical audio lol. its all a guess or a feeling, and you have to move your head and hear the noise again to actually know

[@Bob-of-Zoid]

@@SaebriSelect Not true: Your head and ear lobes, hair... change the sound that's behind you, in a way the same sound sounds different from different directions. It isn't the volume that counts as that can be distance related. The brain can tell distance of some sounds for their familiarity and what volume they are expected to be at. Now add movement, the Doppler effect and what not and you actually do hear in full 3D!

[@emilyrobinson4103]

I'm probably just tired but this is so ethereal I'm almost on the verge of tears. My dog passed away in October and its so emotional to see how he would've perceived the world and us

[@NotTodaySatan557]

Honestly I feel you. I’m also really tired and my doggy died a few weeks ago and it kinda of is punching me in the gut thinking how she saw the world for all of her years ❤️

[@CBRN-115]

I bet your dog lived a happy life under your care. May your dog rest in peace

[@magicmoonart]

Very sorry to hear that I hope they rest in peace too

[@animeloveer97]

Just know that it means that your dog experienced a long happy life in their eyes ❤

[@astro-blaster4190]

I just lost mine me after 16 years. I’d give anything to see him for 30 seconds. I’m lost

[@ManyArmedMooseDei]

What is particularly interesting is the exceptions in humans pertaining to psychology; autists, for example, can hear sounds of much higher and lower frequency than neurotypicals, as well as having sharper vision to a farther distance, greater perception of changes in ambient temperature, wind direction & speed, and the like, and various other perceptions far greater than neurotypicals. For example, the strobing and buzzing of incandescent lightbulbs, which is absolute sensory hell, or being able to hear bats echolocating at night, hear dog whistles, etc. we see, hear, smell, and otherwise perceive aspects, an entire world for that matter, that those with duller senses could not possibly comprehend. And yet we too are human.

[@greekfreak384]

10:34 not the bird saying “ yeet” 😂😂😂 i knew they can speak English in fast pitch

[@pingucraft95]

Nah dude it's saying yee like its dino ancestors😅

[@CalledJeremy]

MAIN EVENT BIRD USO IS NOW IN YOUR FORESSTT!!!! 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥

[@mattsmoo58]

​@@CalledJeremy I was gonna comment that lol

[@imsoreetodddid9007]

Hearing you say "you want some chicken?' In a slowed down drunken voice is unexpectedly hilarious.

[@JackTheVulture]

This makes me wonder about long lived ambush hunters like tarantulas, who generally have pretty poor vision as far as resolution go, and tend to sit around doing almost nothing until they need to hunt, which is rarely. The longest lived spider was a trapdoor known as Number 16 who lived into her 40s. I wonder what 40 years feels like for a trapdoor Especially since mygalomorphs like trapdoors and tarantulas can have AMAZING reaction times. If you look up a trapdoor grabbing prey, the time it takes for them to grab prey is near instant to us.

[@thromboid]

I've wondered that too. I could never sit perfectly still for as long as spiders and cats do - even if my lunch depended on it!

[@Scootfairy]

Maybe they have a rich internal world.

[@Vysair]

A rock can sit longer than a river because one does not move while the other flow. Basically, if the world seems bland and empty to a spider, won't it just be nothing to them? They won't just feel anything at all unlike a cat or dog which a world seems colorful to them.

[@thromboid]

@@Vysair I think it would be unlikely that spiders would evolve such an excellent survival strategy without being able to tolerate or even enjoy the wait. But maybe they have really good podcasts.

[@user-sn6yb8kr1m]

Even if they have any memories their time may feel like just nothing, lol! Benefit of living in the moment. But regarding their visual perception, the time from their visual sensory experience may be different from their internal time perception. In some of these replies there were questions about cats' supposed slow perception, but it may just be about its visual sensory experience. Their internal time may be different. Our senses may receive more information than we can process, so each sense may have its own time independent of our internal time that ties the story we tell ourselves...

[@K3zz21]

Your channel makes me realize how much I really need to start learning about the world I live in because you are constantly blowing my mind

[@k_hole-r8f]

Something that would have been interesting to touch on is if there are differences in time perception between human individuals. And also if there are any measurable effects of things like stimulants like caffeine, etc. Like, the first time I took an Adderall, it felt like time was going extremely fast. Of course I don't think it changed my hearing or the capabilities of my eyes, but I always wondered how that relates to time perception. Edit: I found this from an article online for anyone else curious: "studies on mice have shown that time perception can be speeded up by stimulating dopamine-producing neurons in the brain. These findings have profound implications for people with dopamine-related disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Here, there is a reduction in dopamine, so sufferers could perhaps be impulsive because they perceive time more slowly."

[@_jms430]

Same here I noticed that with adderall too. Also Nootropics medications like Nuvigil

[@jeremiahfyan]

There is. Its actually a form of hallucination that can make a drug or substance classified as a psyechedelic. Its called Time Dilation. The feeling of time being slowed down or sped up. Strange concept

[@helenafranzen9828]

I believe you are on to something. Remember as a kid how long the summer vacation was compared to how quickly it seems to pass as a grown up. Perhaps it is not only difference in age. Could be gender, culture and genetics as well as medical.

[@jeremiahfyan]

@@helenafranzen9828 i had that theory as a kid. I honestly still believe it. Time dilation. "Normal" passing of time could be different per individual perception. I mean, hormones and other chemicals are constantly influencing our brain, and we know many drugs cause time dilation. Maybe these normal hormones can affect time perception for an individual differently depending on neural pathways in the brain or something. Ive always had the same theory with color. Red to me may be blue to you, and maybe thats why I would like Red and you would like blue. We percieve it the same but we could never know, because what we know of as "blue" or "red" are different but always consistent

[@helenafranzen9828]

@@jeremiahfyan I agree. A typical case are those who are colourblind. If all of us seems to see or percieve a colour as blue we all call it blue. To those who cant see it, it can be whatever they percieve it to be. There are people in theory that takes it a lot further by suggesting that what we call reality is just an illusion created by our brain. I´m not a scientist and can not vouch for that but our brains is still to an extent an unknown territory.

[@Accountdeactivated_1986]

My parrot can talk. ALSO I know exactly how he “hears” humans when we talk, because he mocks us when we are having a conversation, laughing, or even when we are having a heated conversation. He hates those. He goes “Murr murr murr murr murr murr” to mimic humans talking. It’s kind of similar to the “Peanuts” characters teachers and adults murmur. Which makes me convinced that Charles Schultz had a talking bird at one point in his life, before he made those cartoons, or at least someone on his staff did. I’ve even heard my bird mocking some neighbors outside who are speaking in Chinese, and his mimicking of them sounds exactly like his mimicking of my husband and I speaking English. So it’s not specific to one language. It’s just “human speak.” But he also has some things he says to us that are very specific to what he’s just heard (like saying “achoo” right after we sneeze.) So it makes me believe he does have some awareness of what he’s saying, that it’s not just mimicry. Not sure what that means for the rate and speed at which he can hear us. Those are some cute ducks, btw!

[@lsmmoore1]

I figure I know what you mean. Technically the parrot hears the same sounds, but the general way they perceive and filter it is different. When humans tune out and only half hear the conversation, it doesn't (always) sound like that to us. But it always does to a parrot. I would describe that as "worldview" for lack of a better word, and I also want to add that this is something that differs within species as well. The "flow" of the world (that I would define as the way one's brain naturally turns its attention between things whether deliberately or otherwise) is perceived differently through autistic eyes than non-autistic eyes even when all concerned are human. Outside of my own perception, I have only really seen this "flow" represented in the movie Billy Elliot, featuring a boy in a toxically masculine family and who wants to be a ballet dancer - and is definitely autistic. And Billy's autistic issues manifest similarly to those of Zuko from the Avatar the Last Airbender series because, like Zuko, he too is raised by a toxically masculine jerk of a father (so both have meltdowns characterized by very pugilistic anger). Except Billy isn't manipulated the way Zuko is so can still clearly see he wants to do ballet. And it is clear that autistic people were involved in the art direction of that film, because a non-autistic person has neither the words nor frame of reference to know what that even looks like.

[@lsmmoore1]

@UCnu8XvnIdT38APWzGqlHmng I'm not. The phenomenon I am referring to (due to lack of a word for it and difficulty of portrayal) is very difficult to describe, unless you happen to be one of those people whose perceptual filters differ from the norm (which I am). Though there is one hint I can give. If they perceive and filter something differently than we do, they will perceive their own imitation of something we do differently than we do, that imitation will line up with their own perception of the thing - but that imitation will end up sounding like something we do to us, because even though their filter is different from ours, it's still capable of registering the same sounds we hear, with consistent rhythms. And as a result of still being able to hear enough of the sounds line up, they can make an imitation that sounds accurate to our ears even if they hear the imitation and the original sound differently than we do. Because difference in filter is less like being colorblind, if you will, and more like seeing every color, except every color has a different setting. Like if someone saw a rainbow but their rainbow looked like purple, blue, green, indigo, red, orange, yellow, in that order (resulting in seeing red skies, indigo grass, and blue sunsets), so if they transmitted their view of a landscape to us telepathically, the picture would look downright weird to our eyes. But since the color alignment perceived by this hypothetical person is consistent right down to them perceiving the colors of paints in alignment with how they see the rainbow, they could still produce a painting with the correct colors, even to our eyes. And they could still name colors correctly, provided you didn't test them with telepathic imagery, because the colors they learned would be according to their perception and not ours. And the only way you'd see anything is different is through their opinions on which colors clash and which don't. That is how someone can have a very different perception of an aspect of the world, and yet produce accurate representations from the perspective of someone who does not perceive the world the same way. And that is more or less the same level of evidence this person gets from the parrot. Mostly accurate imitation, and a slightly odd form of mockery. And you might not even notice the mockery when it isn't childishly blatant - autistic people have found that they sometimes mock some of the tones of non-autistic folk, only to have the mockery not seen for what it is and taken for a sincere attempt at being polite.

[@jackman5840]

​@@lsmmoore1 you have to be careful with the use of toxic masculinity as a term. it is being used in schools to tell kids they shouldn't want to be active or confident in any way, while it may be a real thing people will always take it as you saying masculinity is by default toxic. Because some people are trying to say that. I guess what I am trying to say is its a fine term but its been used for bad too often to be taken seriously. Plus I don't necessarily agree that it is a fair representation of Zuko's full family dynamic. I don't even think he is autistic to be honest, there are many symptoms of autism that can be caused by an abusive family, and it can be hard for anyone to disagree with their family and nation all at once. especially growing up in schools telling you they are the best. Top that with being exiled by his father in head to head combat, just for speaking up about killing their own men. That is something a child would do autistic or not, when he was told in those schools how wrong that would be. His reactions make sense for anyone including if he was autistic, and he obviously develops anger issues either way. Something that was directly taught to him by his father. He then becomes hyper focused on the only thing that can undo all of that trauma, he just hasn't realized it's all a lie yet. Especially because anyone else would be practically racist toward him for being able to bend fire. Even his uncle keeps up the idea that he should continue his quest, until he sees the right moment to change his mind. Plus you have to realize his uncle had to change his own mind at some point, so he knows how it can be done. I'm not saying it would be bad or wrong for him to be autistic, I honestly think it's an interesting way to look at the character. Either way he is maybe the most compelling character in the series. Someone with mild schizophrenia could tell you there are similarities with him as well. and someone with bad schizophrenia might say some things about how Azula acts. I'm not the latter, so i'm not sure.

[@lsmmoore1]

@@jackman5840 I think you're getting your information on what is being taught in schools from biased sources, because I don't get the impression kids are actually being taught most of the claims about aspects of themselves being inherently bad that parents are being told they are (unless the teaching is that they are filthy sinners who need Jesus or that their neurodivergencies - i.e. autism - make them inherently bad). As for Zuko, a big reason why he is widely seen as autistic among autistic people is because of the fact that he seems to cling to Azula for social expertise all the time, even within his family. This stands out especially in a family where the overall level of social expertise (of the normal variety) is generally high, such that even its wisest man, Iroh, is a skilled manipulator when he needs to be (though Iroh is honest enough not to use those abilities all the time).

[@jackman5840]

@@lsmmoore1 i was told in school that I was being toxically masculine for crossing my arms in a weird way to comfort myself as it was my first year in Public school. Its a toxic term. I'll get back to you on zuko later. I have also never met a Christian who hated autistic people. That is something from your biased source. I was told I was evil in a Christian school for wanting long hair though. You have to see that its not everyone everywhere. But that term can be hurtful to people either way.

[@Moodymongul]

10:30 - those audio adjusted bird sounds ..I'm betting, this is what large dinosaurs would sound like to our human ears today :)

[@jhunraylumantas9598]

Dog's POV gives them a nostalgic feeling. No wonder they always seem to enjoy everything they do

[@edmonterey5138]

For the first part about dogs tilting their heads, I remember watching a very interesting video about the exact opposite thing to what you said; human's ears have evolved to be able to diagnose the direction, or plane on which a sound lies, by the loops and curls that defines our ears. Many animals don't have this setup (dogs, birds, etc...) so we are technically more advanced in the regard of honing, not so much with audible frequency. The conclusion was made by the guy sticking silly putty in his son's ears, blindfolding him and then having him pinpoint his mom and dad (the creator of the video) clapping in different points around the kid. Needless to say, it was to no avail. Therefore, take those beautiful traits your weird ears have and be grateful they look the way they do!

[@Cody_Ramer]

Not only that but our ears are slightly lower/ higher than the other making it easy to pinpoint where sounds are coming from without tilting our heads.

[@brodriguez11000]

@@Cody_Ramer Don't owls have the ear height difference?

[@edmonterey5138]

@@brodriguez11000 yes, but I think Cody was saying that we have this AND that.

[@Cody_Ramer]

@@brodriguez11000 yup although they have slightly more difference than we do however we also have the specially shaped ears to go with it.

[@StaK_1980]

That was probably Destin from Smarter everyday.

[@LordPufficuss]

I've developed the head swivel to locate sounds while working at an airport. You hear planes all the time taking off, idling, taxiing and I know what each sounds like. Crossing a taxiway in dense fog ,this came in handy as a large plane was crossing as well. I heard a light sound of the engines getting louder and chose to wait. About 10 seconds later a wing tip appeared in front of me. I also had a large plane sneak up on me out of nowhere, somehow, even after a 360 degree sight check. Heard the engines and slammed on the brakes. I also use this while driving. I can hear engines or tires on the interstate. I rotate my head slightly to locate where it is coming from and find a car in my blind spot. I find it safer to do that then rotate my whole head to see the car unless I am immediately changing lanes. What is more amazing is I can hear such things clearly while still having hearing damage from racing engines, gunshots, machinery and previously mentioned airplane engines.

[@jasonperez7811]

You're not the only one. I can hear stuff like that too. I often hear a motorcycle or truck in the distance and can tell how far away it is based on the sound. While others hear nothing, only to hear it as it gets closer. I can also hear infrasound and have proven this with frequency spectrometers. But this drives me nuts, especially sounds from anytype of airconditioner, fan, etc. I can hear rf sometimes too. But I'm sensitive to things like thunder and am a musician. So IDK, it's nice to know I'm not the only one out there like this.

[@Danceswithfishes]

I do this too! My eyesight was very poor growing up (I only found out how bad it was when I went to an opticians in my thirties), so I learned to pay attention to sounds and even click my tongue. 🤷🏻‍♀️

[@marinamartin2567]

& No doubt it probably put lots of questions(that u didn't know u should be asking). { lol } ...into different perspectives for u, too.. am I right? & I totally agree with u on that too, (btw).. bc I have definitely learned (or is it "learnt") a lot more amazing stuff,from dudes like this guy, than I ever did in school.. I'm not kidding..I'm being honest.

[@marinamartin2567]

Oh & everything u said about the way u taught yourself how to hear sounds is so cool,btw & I,myself, think u'r highly intelligent,..which is hard to find in most people..(imo). ...I'm just sayin'

[@jasonperez7811]

@@marinamartin2567 everyone's always just saying these suits are after me but I'm sure it's just zine.

[@21EC]

8:02 - wow...then this explains why and how they can jump so freaking quickly from branch to branch so easily without failing even once and in such precise way..they see everything much slower and it gives them extra time in their perception to be able to perform that properly with such coordination of their legs.

[@kurtmill9080]

Benn, this video is a perfect example of how we need to change our relationship with nature and the animal kingdoms we live alongside with. Knowing about these factors of time perception, colour perception, sound registering, helps us empathize, communicate, learn and grow. And that is so valuable. Thank you for this video.

[@charq3546]

That duck belly petting at 9:07 just landed on my bucket list

[@jackmcmorrow]

I've noticed the same thing about my pets, they used to ignore any screens in the house, but nowadays most of them watch TV or look at videos on my computer screen. Thanks for the excellent video, I'm subscribing.

[@normavoyton3208]

Couldn't help but smile seeing the pov of the dog running through the field 5:13

[@frowlong]

Watching your dogs running through the grass is the most wholesome thing I've ever seen and I never knew I needed it until now 🥺

[@WhileMyGuineaPigGentlyWheeks]

Ikr

[@tweedpenguin712]

Why do people like you comment this? “I’ve ever seen.” And comment the same thing over and over lol. Dumb.

[@androidemulator6952]

Strangely relaxing..was it the dogs or music ??

[@adhd_with_pennies4867]

Ik never knew dogs hear like that crazy lol no wonder my dog can't watch TV POOR animals I wish they where like us so we could watch TV together like us it be more enjoyable if the black lines in the screen where not there I feel bad for them lol

[@zenluvsfun]

I felt so moved watching things from the dogs perspective. It was magical.

[@RVlivingcoast2coast]

Not to nit-pick, but since only the dog's 'perception' of sound is slower, and not the timing of the sound itself, they would not experience the pitch change that happens when you slow it down. They would perceive the sound slower, but at the same pitch.

[@GENERALTIM21]

playing the normal parts of the video at 0.5 and 0.75 speed gives you a rough idea of what a dog's perception of time/sound is, i think

[@RVlivingcoast2coast]

@@GENERALTIM21 Right, I'm just pointing out while slower, the sound won't change pitch. For example if I start tapping middle C on a piano, it would vibrate the air at about 264 Hz, it's that frequency that determines the pitch, and makes it a middle C. The air would still vibrate the dogs ear drums at 264 Hz, and still be a middle C, even while the dog might perceive my tapping as slower. But, when you slow a recording, you're slowing the Hz of the sound, and a middle C would no longer be a middle C, but converted to a lower pitch. Again, I'm just nit-picking, and the general premise may very well be correct.

[@RavenTheElder]

So, I work with animals professionally, and I have ALWAYS wondered how dogs & cats perceive reality/time compared to us humans. This is absolutely FASCINATING!!!

[@Alan-tjj]

They see and perceive everything just like we do.. just not as smart as us and not interested in the same things .except food ..:)

[@TheZenChii]

The bird segment is what I imagine dinosaurs sounded like.

[@aaronrodgers9202]

The thing about dogs we also have to realize is their sense of smell is so good they can perceive reality much more clearly than even their eyes and ears making up for the lack of color etc.

[@therizinosaurus214]

Now I am curious about this with birds that mimic sounds, particularly the the ones that reproduce the sound accurately

[@zhch]

If the sounds are going much slower, it would be easier to reproduce. Also, all they have to do is to reproduce the pitch as _they_ hear it, and it will sound right when _we_ hear it. When sound slows down its pitch gets lower, since the sound waves would have longer wavelengths. As this applies to all the sounds they hear, it means that everything is shifted downwards in pitch. So C -> B, B -> A etc.

[@tiffanyvalencia8415]

I don't think the laws of physics change from specie to specie nor human, esp during the same time period.

[@rhayat10]

I'd imagine that humans have various time perceptions from individual to individual, and maybe from population to population. These variations would be small for sure - but consider how our time perception changes as we grow up and get older.

[@seanhenry8243]

Bingo! Time isn't even a constant for human beings, and I'd be willing to bet that even an individual's time sense changes as they age.

[@ellielou52]

Is that something that we know to be true? That ppls time perception does actually change as you age? I know it's something ppl say, that every year seems to go by faster and faster, but I've always thought, and heard others say (not experts just ppl in my life) that its because a certain amount of time, say 1 day, when you're 1 year old would feel long because it's 1/365 if their entire life and perceived time. But 1 day to 50 year old 1/18250 (i think, did it in my head) of their life and perceived time. I've also thought that maybe it has something to do with everyday traumas we experience, and for some big traumas that would make it even worse, causing us dissociate from our lives. Like once we got to school and were extremely bored and stressed and that boredom and stress increase through our school years, and we start to dissociate from time a little to get through that boredom and stress. By the time we retire at 63ish and have worked full time and experienced loss like death and pain from relationships and friends and had near death experiences and ask the other little and big traumas for 63 years we've become so used to dissociating from reality to get through the day to day that that's our new normal, and when you dissociate things go by faster for you. Which is why it's so inorganic to learn mindfulness and learning to sit in your feelings and all that. But maybe I am only seeing the world through my own lense and that's what makes sense to me based on my own life and problem with dissociating. But I'd be sorry interested to hear your take on that and any theories you or the scientific community have on our time perception!

[@ellielou52]

Sry for my errors i accidentally hit send before proofreading and swype was not my friend here 😆 KZbin won't let me edit, don't know why. Most of them are little errors, but "inorganic" was meant to be "important".

[@seanhenry8243]

@@ellielou52 time perception changes day to day and minute to minute, based on many factors. Does it change as we get older, too? I don't know of any scientific study, but anecdotally, I know it has for me, it did for my parents, and for every living person as old or older than me that I speak with about it. So *shrug* let's say that we don't know for sure, but that we DO know that time perception can swing wildly based on many factors.

[@rhayat10]

I don't think this is something that can be empirically proven or disproven - but my statement is based on personal experience, and experiences of other people. It would be nice if somebody from the scientific community joined the conversation.@@ellielou52

[@JuliaSable]

The clearest, most current, most imaginative and entertaining resource I’ve ever seen on critical flicker fusion frequency! Brilliant!

[@Jpanda16]

I literally tweeted the other day "the thing people forget the most about the potential for alien life is the possibility that they exist on a different time scale than us, either moving so fast or so slow we may not be able to perceive them."

[@liamrmorgans921]

Very interesting point. That might explain the alleged ufo sightings where they describe them moving incredibly fast

[@Ostritchbones]

Experiencing time faster won't make you move faster

[@liamrmorgans921]

@@Ostritchbones experiencing time slower can lend itself to moving faster though. Like the house fly compared to us humans. Like the example he gave in the video, if you move slowly toward the fly it arguably can’t even see you move because its too slow for them to pick up. Thats just two species on the same planet in the same galaxy. Maybe the difference gets even more heightened on different planets in different galaxies.

[@kevincastro8768]

@@liamrmorgans921 But the fly is still bound to physical laws which both animals and machine need to follow. Animals adapt to their environment, so like the guy said, time perception doesn’t make you move faster.

[@liamrmorgans921]

@@kevincastro8768 well it can make you move faster, but the question is by how much. Like the flies not being able to detect our slow movement, yet being able to move very fast. Im just thinking maybe there’s aspects of physics that we don’t understand that change in different galaxies, Maybe being in closer proximity to black holes has an impact etc. or maybe even material existence itself changes based on what frequency/timescale the life form is attuned to. Sort of like other dimensions. Rupert Sheldrake has an interesting ted talk that was banned (you can find on KZbin) where he talks about the “laws” of nature and his suggestion that they arguably aren’t actually laws. He uses the speed of light as an example and says they “fixed it” as a constant to the speed it’s recognised at today, but the data actually showed that it was not a consistent speed.

[@centralpoint8184]

(5:18) I didn't know dogs hear music we can't hear

[@nikkibpainting]

Thank you so much for the warning! I don't have epilepsy but I do have photosensitivity especially with flashing lights due to a prior brain injury. There are lots of folks who can't look at flashing or strobing for various reasons, so I think it's awesome that you put that warning put there ahead of time!

[@RedMeansRecording]

What a wonderful idea and execution for a video

[@RedMeansRecording]

Also: Me: here's my 10,000 modular system for making wild crazy synth sounds Bird: wow that sounds like shit

[@StpSqncr]

@@RedMeansRecording lol

[@demrasnawla]

As far as I know the reason we don't tilt our heads is because we have very complex shapes in our ears which let us hear direction fairly accurately without needing to move our heads

[@SeanMillea]

But doesn’t 28 days in bullet time feel like a few years at least? Great vid!

[@FarzynoMusic]

It would feel like 18 weeks

[@fakeskyler2305]

@@FarzynoMusic damn

[@BAFLOD]

For you. But for [insert animal] no it would be precived as fast as us. Imagine if Godzilla and Kong fighting IRL (assuming they survive the physics) that fight, to us would be molasses up close. To Kong and Zilla, its an mma fight. Preception is faster, but it dosnt mean the brain signals fire slower. I hope that made since?

[@sgshaday]

That's what I was thinking. 18 weeks, really, but I do get what you mean. Pretty beautiful when you think about it.

[@Woody-nc1ru]

@@BAFLOD So is it similar to like seeing a C-5 galaxy flying? They're so big it looks like they are barely flying.

[@deesteve4156]

The only complaint i have is , I always see shows, show the dogs color perspective with the blue yellow and green , which is fine..But its not BLURRY, a dog has pretty good vision, its much more clear than shown!

[@philurbaniak1811]

This is a whole new level of empathy. I can't believe those high pitched dogs don't know they're high pitched.

[@dnlv4235]

we don't even acknowledge, that our sense of smell is 1000 times worse than dog's

[@MrAkpla]

Very interesting video, but let me cite you something about the 60 FPS myth "The USAF, in testing their pilots for visual response time, used a simple test to see if the pilots could distinguish small changes in light. In their experiment a picture of an aircraft was flashed on a screen in a dark room at 1/220th of a second. Pilots were consistently able to "see" the afterimage as well as identify the aircraft. This simple and specific situation not only proves the ability to percieve 1 image within 1/220 of a second, but the ability to interpret higher FPS."

[@benmullin9076]

This

[@uazuazu]

That can easily be explained because your eye doesn't mind whether the light comes in full brightness over 1/220 of a second or half as bright over 1/110 of a second or a quarter as bright over 1/50.5 of a second. So you get one "frame" with an aircraft on it. I think the 60 FPS thing makes sense, although the exact frequency varies from person to person. 30 years ago I worked at a place that had computer terminals using old-style TV tubes. All the ones we bought were 72Hz ones. But sometimes the maintenance engineers would swap out a faulty unit and leave us a 50Hz or 60Hz one instead. I could immediately tell, just from looking at the screen (it felt like a kind of tension in my head), which I'd then confirm by waving my hand in front of the screen, and checking the label on the back. However most of the operators couldn't see it. So I think my FPS is on the higher end, and theirs was perhaps a little lower.

[@tigerwizard6388]

Aye, it's why I find it funny when people say 240hz monitors are a waste of money. Like what, have they ever tried it? Once you get used to 240hz if you switch back to 60hz it feels wrong, stuttery, clunky.

[@GeauxMAB_n_Gumbeaux]

@@RockBrentwood I actually see the waves of light in most light bulbs except extra bright LEDs and that's due to the brightness.

[@neo_bellic]

I think people are misuderstanding that humans can see upto 60fps. I mean at around 60fps, we'd see a smooth continuous motion rather than an individual frame of a moment, but we'd still be able to see a flash of light or a change in our vision beyond 60fps.

[@RussianShadowDragon]

I have a certain grudge against those who deceived me as a kid, making me think that pythons saw rainbows of colour like a thermal imaging camera, instead of what they actually perceive, which is more like regular eyesight plus the ability to *feel* where thermal energy is coming from, sort of like how I can feel a candle from close by, and tell where sound is coming from. So... first off, I don't like the assumption that sounds perceived by faster animals sound lower in pitch. It could very well simply be slower while still otherwise being perceived by them the same way as humans. That is, when translating the sound "as perceived by dogs", it could very well be more accurate to stretch the sound while maintaining frequency. Unless it's known already that it works otherwise, that is. Also, a higher cff doesn't necessarily mean a faster perception of time, though it does imply such. It could very well be similar to how human rod optical cells are more sensitive to motion and light, while the cones have a higher resolution and colour sensitivities. It could be that the higher cff animals can perceive small differences in time better, while still processing that information at the same perception speed as us. It doesn't seem very likely, but until someone comes out and says they've found that answer, I'd rather not assume. Easy example: does a human's cff get lowered when they take time-perception-altering drugs? Because I would think that that drunk people can still tell when a video is low framerate, but will still react and generally think slower than normal. I love these kinds of videos that get people thinking, but I don't like how simplified they can get.

[@kaithleen3872]

I understand where your question is coming from but what I understood from this video is that while the stimulus is happening at the same time, the realities per the being are perceived differently. In an elephant's body they will feel like they are running away from the storm, but we just see them chillin walking slowly because of how we perceive reality.

[@riksstaden4927]

Great comment!

[@darkmatter-mc5iv]

I like when they get simplified, but then also explain it more complex. By saying it complex, some people can't grasp the understanding, even if it explains in more depth, while making it simple is easier to understand, but doesn't give you the full grasp of the information. Learned this while trying to figure out Elder Scrolls Lore.

[@L1ttl3J1m]

@@kaithleen3872 You know elephants can run faster than humans, yeah?

[@Fantumh]

"Also, a higher cff doesn't necessarily mean a faster perception of time, though it does imply such." I don't think it implies it at all. I think it's one of the dumbest assertions I've seen made by an intelligent person. A two-hour movie is still a two-hour movie, whether it's projected at 24fps or 60fps. The greater "detail" would certainly allow the brain to process information more accurately, but not more quickly. The brain is still limited by the rate of neurons firing. And also there's always a trade-off, a brain becoming very good at one kind of task at the expense of other tasks, in a similar way that when humans are deprived of one of their senses, their other senses can become more sensitive. We're just talking about perception here, nothing else.

[@UsagiPonPon]

I loved this! Every time I interact with my cat I try to imagine her perception, they do have a sharper view than ours, but only in short distances, so when they sit on a balcony and stare at the city, they see as if they had a really advanced, washed out, myopia.

[@opotatoqopotato467]

And yet anything closer than 12” will look blurry. They’re mid sighted! So when I’m kissing my cats nose he won’t see my pores

[@stickinthemud23]

Until something moves, that is.

[@Leap_of_Faithhh]

I wondered about such a thing as temporal resolution for over a decade, I never heard anyone mention it before. Thanks, that was very helpful.

[@Jwellsuhhuh]

I respect this person's content and effort spent into creating this video, however I need to point out some false/misleading information regarding the perception of time in animals. The flashing light experiment (cff) does not experimentally verify anything about how an animal perceives time, or sound, or whatever else. That is completely speculative. There is a phenomenon called "persistance of vision" (search google) where an image shown on the retina will persist for a given amount of time after being removed, hence giving the illusion that a light is no longer blinking. All that the CFF experiments can VERIFY is the amount of time an image stays on an animals retina before removed, roughly given by the inverse of the flicker fusion rate in Hz. It is definitely "possible" that dogs can hear or experience sound slower than us, however that has never been experimentally verified. The CFF experiment would only be able to "verify" that something other than persistance of vision affects the CFF rate if you could somehow control for persistance of vision, which you can't. TL;DR you cannot verify that CFF rate has a relationship with perception of time/sound, as the extraneous variable of persistance of vision has not been controlled.

[@SmithMason5494]

@@Jwellsuhhuh Yeah I was going to say. This only measure visual perceptivity, according to this methodology, a blind person would never experience time passing as their CFF would be 0. Hearing and Seeing are different perceptions with different frequencies, so this video is largely just insanely misleading.

[@KattKirsch]

Gosh, do I love this. Two things. 1) I'm a big synth nerd, but I'm also the daughter of an environmental biologist. This is, quite surprisingly, the most interesting video I've seen you do. 2) You can tell a lot about a person by how they respond to animals, and how animals respond to you. Seeing your happy lil quacker get its tummy rubs told me everything I need to know that you're a good egg.

[@jimi272]

No way, I’m a guitar and synth nerd and son of two biologists too😅👌

[@stacielivinthedream8510]

I loved that too, when he drives his ducks belly! I came here to leave that comment! I like him because it showed his heart and when he wouldn't drop his cat! 🥰🥰😇😇

[@robertbailey4271]

Nobody's perfect but we don't have to be (in fact we're incapable of that) BUT if the glimpses of Benn's soul shared with us in this video are to be believed, then I concur that a special place in Heaven exists for him! On a side note, I am curious as to how you lost half your left eye brow Benn..?

[@mattd1142]

That doesn’t necessarily mean that your dog hears you with a Deep voice. That just because you slowed down the audio.

[@FlintWithSteel]

Is this some sort of joke? He slowed down the video to give us an example of how dogs hear our voice😐

[@Xer_Mrcy]

Bird calls: majestic sounding Hummingbird: YEEEEEEEE

[@alejandrogorostiza1197]

I bumped into this video and being the type that doesn't mind knowing a little of a WIDE variety of things and not being an expert in any of them I must thank you profoundly! This was incredibly interesting and best of all I didn't know ANY OF THIS before watching your video. Thanks again good sir! Keep up the great work😁👍🏾

[@Blueberry_Shortcake01]

take it with a grain of salt mate, most of what he said is theoretical to fake

[@kimberlykees9163]

Med too! I like to know something about everything!

[@BrownMInc]

Same here; even though a lot may have been very theoretical it's the first in a long time that I genuinely felt refreshed learning something new or atleast interesting ideas that could be adapted.

[@bluerendar2194]

We actually *do* have a second-axis sound locating mechanism though - the ear shape. The slight temporal reflection differences give a basic locating mechanism - we can distinguish a sound from above vs below, front vs back, with pretty decent accuracy in most cases, at least enough to know where to look. Overall, it means a head-tilt is not so necessary. This is most obvious if you add in a putty insert, messing with the sound reflections, and compare a blindfolded test of this. SmarterEveryday ran a video about this some time ago.

[@GrassPossum]

I have tinnitus but also very good hearing despite this. I do tilt my head naturally when a sound is faint and especially to ascertain direction. I don't know if I always have done, or just since my tinnitus developed maybe 25 years ago.,

[@FallenAngelHiroko]

Also dogs are visual creatures (as in body language). Meaning they tilt their heads to better see our faces when we speak to them. A "double take" of sorts. There's more to it than that--I remember watching a video similar to this guy's--but that's the only part I remember. That said, I do a head tilt when I hear something faint. It's not necessarily for me to hear the sound better or determine the direction but rather to help me process what I'm hearing (Did I really hear something? What was that?). Kinda like how people look up when thinking.

[@GrassPossum]

@@FallenAngelHiroko These are interpretations. How would you know this is why dogs tilt their heads? Did they tell you? Since it is response to a sound, and I do so too, and you yourself said you do it in response to a sound, I think you're being ridiculous now. Logic is simply not taught anymore is it? Sigh, youngsters.

[@ClassyCrustatio]

Thats.... that's not how that works... 1. Humans actually see around o0 fps on average but it varies up and down depending on the person, their lifestyle, jib, etc. 2. Even if dogs see around 80 hertz/fps doesn't mean they perceived time more slowly. It just means they see more images a second. 60fps and 80 fps still happen over the corse of 1 second. Saying they see time move more slowly is only if you stretch that 80 to be in sync with 60... they percieve time at the exact same speed that we do, with the exception that they have no concept of time. Additionally, they would hear things more slowly either since sound wave travel at the same wave length and speed. If they heard things more slowly that would mean thier brain processes things more slowly and then presents them in a slowed manner. A dog may be able to see the flashing images on a screen but that doesn't mean they are watching something in slow motion. This is a great example of false equivalence.

[@soulnull]

I feel as though our temporal perception changes based on age. A kid seems to perceive time differently from an adult. Has there been any research into this? It's easy to say "oh, a kid has so much energy and nothing going on so the world is different for them". I've always been told time "feels" faster as we age.. but is it unreasonable to think that it's not just a feeling, but an actual change to our perception and interpretation of time? I can tell you that a year in my mid 20s felt vastly different from a year in my early 30s in terms of time... And thats under very similar circumstances. Meanwhile, summer as a kid felt like forever. Or even counting the days until Christmas in anticipation and how long it seemed. Just thinking that it might not be life events, but actual shifts in perception... Very curious about this. As a kid, adult voices sounded deep, now kids voices sound squeaky. Adults move at a different pace in walking, kids run to get places.. meanwhile old people drive slow because it probably feels like the same speed they've always gone.. because their perception of time is different.. I believe time is fundamentally differently perceived, it stretches... but I'm just thinking out loud at this point, I'd love to see someone actually dig into this.

[@ItsMeFern2019]

I've been wondering about that too! I feel like our size and age somehow affects our perception of time. Childhood feels like it'll last forever and then it seems like everything becomes increasingly faster the older you get.. So nice to know I'm not the only one who's entertained these thoughts!

[@Otierela]

I think is because 1 year of you life when you are 10 years old, is 1/10 of you whole life. And when you are 50 years old, 1 years only amount to 1/50 of you whole life.

[@HUYI1]

Good thought, this is intriguing, more research should be concluded about this 🤔🤔

[@casbee9610]

Yes, there has been research. Time moves slower when you learn you things. That's why time flies the older you get: your brain already has seen most of the things you encounter when you're 30 instead of 13 where many things are still new.

[@janedrowned]

@@casbee9610 can you please share a link to the research? Sounds quite plausible.

[@hexshadowman]

I work around horses for a living, so I'd be curious to see how equines and other ungulates perceive time, both domesticated species like horses and cows, as well as wild ones such as zebras and deer.

[@buffycleaveland8116]

Me too!! Video two Horsey's and the like!!

[@jannacoyote4246]

…and, don’t forget to include wild horses as compared to domesticated horses! That should be interesting as well. 😄💜🐴💜😄

[@SchrodingerMil]

@@jannacoyote4246 there’s only one truly wild horse species left, native to Mongolia. Every other species on Earth has been domesticated and selectively bred at one point, making them “feral” instead of Wild.

[@mystictheshapeshifter]

Personally from observing horses and recently cows I would expect they perceive time as moving faster than we do. You can easily spook a horse or cow if you move too fast, you have to move slower so they can more easily perceive where you’re moving and what you’re doing! 😄

[@ghost1fer]

me too, i love studying horses and this would be obscure knowledge i’d like to randomly share with my equestrian friends

[@v4riab1lity77]

Bro so flies can see our 240hz monitor’s refresh rate? That’s… think about that…

[@TheKjtheDj]

I’m surprised you didn’t mention how digital audio sample rates are related to the highest frequency that humans can hear, so audio at a 44.1 kHz would sound very under sampled to a cat or dog.

[@hightowergaming5301]

#MindBlown

[@DarkAngelEU]

Is this why they don't respond to people speaking on television, radio or a phone that much?

[@EversonBernardes]

@@DarkAngelEU possible. We lave lots of ultrasonic elements to our speech that are completely absent in recordings. To them, it likely sounds "wrong". Kinda like listening to music through a low pass filter.

[@TheKjtheDj]

@@EversonBernardes low pass filter is a good idea of what it might sound like, but since it's a digital signal there would also be significant aliasing which would also cause it to sound very grainy and digitized. I saw a video that gives a good audio demonstration of aliasing, if I can find it I'll post it here.

[@glitchyrich_7007]

To go further with this, its also a slight marketing scheme when it comes to purchasing or subscribing to High Fidelity or HQ audio from streaming platforms. Practically all delivered audio is 44.1 kHz and what platforms like Spotify or Tidal upgrades offer is simply 99.6 kHz which theoretically the human ear is incapable of perceiving. Some might argue those higher sampled rates are simply for FX processing such as the tail end of Reverb though, which in turn is worth the cost.

[@hailonyourparade]

I can't remember the last time I enjoyed a KZbin video this much! Love that slowing the ducks down to their perceived time dilation immediately made them recognizably more...dinosaur-like? Another example of plants being "aware of time/pressure": Venus fly traps! I'm glad you went through the effort of simulating a whole day night cycle for your littles though 😊

[@MoonCat49]

It has always been my perception that we can be more sympathetic towards others if we understand them better. To understand each other, we have to walk a mile in another's shoes, experience life through their eyes. Science just keeps on proving this concept. Absolutely fascinating video. It was astounding to see my senior cats respond to sounds they would normally ignore. Keep up these brilliant scientific videos!

[@Svenshine]

Yup and I always have thought any argument ever, is just because of a misunderstanding. But science hurts people a lot of times, just as much as it helps people.

[@ChrisFerguson-zm4gt]

I don't understand this at all and I normally understand physics videos

[@prototropo]

I love Lucy's ears flopping in slow motion as she bounds through a yellow & blue cosmos. Dreamy and endearing.

[@spiritualiteathee1638]

I suggest to consider both the Critical Flicker Fusion (CFF) rate and the information processing speed of animals to provide a more holistic understanding of their visual perception. For rodents, with their faster neural processing due to their small brain and a CFF close to humans, one might expect them to perceive things in slower motion, having more time to react to it, while having some blur effect in the vision because the image would not be updated as quickly.

[@sweetvictory3100]

I have no idea what I just tried to watch but it went over my head unfortunately

[@calabrais]

This is what I was going to say. It feels wrong to say cats experience time sped up, when their reaction speed is significantly faster than ours. Watching a cat repeatedly swat down a snake striking toward it would indicate they perceive time slower.

[@ryanfraser6014]

I'm not sure that that matters. Cats may experience time faster and the motion more blurry and less smooth, but still react quickly. Perception of time and sensory is only one component of mental reaction speed.

[@pustulio81]

On a shutter speed note, when I was managing a movie theater we had an employee who had an issue with his vision that made it so he could see the flickering from the projectors shutter. He said it made it difficult, to near impossible, to watch a movie all the way through.

[@kinglyzard]

This explains why most wild animals can dodge predation so effectively. Seeing everything in slow motion can really provide ample time to react to attack and even approach.

[@gamursnek]

I did not realize birds, at least audibly, live in an alien hellscape

[@Jwxx13]

I just wanna say thank you for the epilepsy warning.. A lot of creators don’t even do that. I’m sure all of us with epilepsy even with this one video appreciate it. To that this is amazing to see how sounds are heard within animals. Amazing knowledge.

[@tama3442]

Have faith in JESUS CHRIST as LORD and SAVIOR for HE SAVES from hell❗️ *What is the Gospel?* The true gospel is the good news that God saves sinners. Man is by nature sinful and separated from God with no hope of remedying that situation. But God, by His power, provided the means of man’s redemption in the death, burial, and resurrection of the Savior, Jesus Christ. Ephesians 2:8-9 For it is by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of GOD, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. Romans 10:9 9 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. JESUS CHRIST can come anytime! Just Believe ❤️ Love you and GOD BLESS

[@herbert42069]

@@tama3442 jesus doesn't heal my epilepsy

[@youngeshmoney]

I don't have epilepsy, but I scrolled across a video on Instagram that had a CRAZY flashing sequence with no warning. So I mentioned it in the comments and everyone called me a dumbass and told me to just not watch the video if I have epilepsy lmao. Like yeah that's my point, someone with epilepsy wouldn't have watched if there was a warning, which is why I'm saying there should be a warning. People are so dunce nowadays.

[@Jwxx13]

@@youngeshmoney yeah i couldn't agree with you more! The people who are saying "well don't watch the video if you have epilepsy." I say ... " Well I wouldn't if i wasn't knowingly going to have a seizure because of it." (*side note backstory/rant) I also find it very interesting and so does my neurologist, I'm a huge gamer and some games have giant flashes and flash patterns.. Never once have I have a seizure playing video games going on 14 years now. But I did have a seizure from a video on ticktok once... which is why i was sooo great-full for the creator of the video and the content he provides to gives us the warning.

[@Jwxx13]

@@herbert42069 This is facts.. he doesn't help or heal mine either. Neither do the gods I invoke... weird huh? XD

[@roberttompkins9991]

Another cool effect of this is led lights that can glow at any color. They really only blink in intervals of red blue or yellow, but at a higher rate of speed then 60 hz. So our brains mix the ratios into perceiving it as a single different color. If you use that same device you used to demonstrate the strobe effect you will see certain led lights let’s say a “purple” light. When you set the frame sped to the matching hz you will see the led going from red to blue. How much red and how much blue depends on the shade of purple.

[@kuroshite]

I sometimes think what it would be like to perceive the world as an ultimate observer, like camera RAW. How you'd see every little detail that's going on without any tricks or limitations.

[@YannR34]

Some projectors which alternate the 3 colors to project images are not good for me, when I move my eyes even a little bit I see the colors not in phase anymore, and it's ugly. I can't believe that everyone see the same or those projector would never have existed.

[@nobodynoone2500]

Sub 150hz PWM lights are an instant headache for me. The human eye an see much faster than 60hz.

[@treelym]

Awesome video. You forgot to note that birds fave two vocal cords, so not only do they hear slower, but make to different pitched notes at once.

[@perrybb2]

This explains why cats always freak out unless you move slowly around them

[@MarkusAT]

You might have mistaken the resolution with speed. Cats might see blur easier than humans, but it doesn't mean that everything is sped up for them. Things still are perceived real time. Dogs don't hear us speaking slower than we are. Let's say that they have higher ISO in camera sense

[@RonBest]

There is no real time. The universe has near infinite FPS, or at least a very very high amount. The planck time unit is the theoretical smallest time unit. There are approximately 10 tredecillion planck time units in every second. If we could percieve each one of these planck time units the world would be painfully slow to us, every second would feel like the time the entire universe existed multiplied with an octillion. Every life form in the world lives their lives with the reality heavily sped up and cant percieve even near the same fps that the universe operates in. But every life form dont have the reality sped up same amount, which is why some animals indeed percieve time slower or faster than us humans, This is a fact.

[@dunar1005]

@@RonBest you did not get his point

[@elis9851]

​@@dunar1005 i mean they are used to it. When you get high the world is played on slow motion too. A bottle falling from a hand takes multiple seconds compared to real time where it is almost instant. You can think thoughts at that speed, but your body feels incredivly heavy and slow.

[@yeetyfreety6938]

@@elis9851 Bro seriously thinks getting high gives him time shifting abilities.

[@pm69669]

@@yeetyfreety6938time perceiving abilities

[@monytontana5184]

It's funny you should mention this! I've always had a theory that children experience the world at a slower pace... that's why it takes much longer to grow up than it does to continue to age after you become an adult

[@jaymartinson3236]

To a 10 year old 5 years is half of their life, while to a 50 year old its 1/10th... That's why time seems longer when you are a kid.

[@touchthegoose8487]

It kind of disheartens me that so many people are taking popular science like this at such a face value when there are SO many confounders. Your statement, for example really does not take in to account a myriad of factors. When you're an adult, usually you're doing things that you want to do, or are otherwise engaged in, where there have been multiple studies showing that human perception of time varies with engagement. I remember when I was a kid this was also the case. When it was the weekend and I was playing videogames, the day would be over instantly, but then the next day at school would drag soooo slowly. I'm not saying you're 100% wrong, i'm just saying that the hypothesis proposed in this video has some problems with it.

[@giraffe1219]

@@touchthegoose8487 idk I feel like the video and this comment actually aren’t related. It’s obvious why kids experience life slower, and the response above this explains it. What you describe adults still experience. But as the other comment said, as a 5 year old 1 year is 1/5 of your life. As a 50 year old. It’s 1/50th. Of course that’s going to speed time up. But not in the way the video is describing imo.

[@BurritoMassacre]

Vsauce has a video on time perception, it’s called Illusions of Time.

[@MustacheDLuffy]

Partially I think. I feel like it is slower as a kid but I think as an adult you have a better perception of time. So as a kid you’re stuck in a grocery store but as an adult you’re buying food you will want to eat

[@chazellecromhout7312]

I really appreciated the seizure warning. There are so many videos on youtube that dont think to do that. It actually pleasantly surprised me to see one!! Thank you 🙏

[@gigisgarden8044]

I came to say the same. Thanks

[@riftis2210]

Ya or worse they treat seizures like a gag and do it on purpose like bruh

[@theflyingdutchguy9870]

i think the hard thing is thinking of it in the first place. and most people dobt know excaclty what can trigger a seizure. i thibk its less a content creator problem but more a youtube problem. but on the other hand youtube cant possibly check every video ever uploaded

[@jumpstartt249]

@@theflyingdutchguy9870 They could add a check option for uploaders to select that would tell consumers if the video contains anything that could possibly cause seizures. This wouldn't be 100% accurate and would mostly be based on the persons understanding of what triggers them but it would be a simple step in the right direction.

[@theflyingdutchguy9870]

@@jumpstartt249 that would be awesome.we need to get a lot of people sending tickets to youtube asking for this. then we can actually make that happen.

[@denisemiller4083]

My son has a history of epilepsy, used to have seizures under the lights in stores, public spaces. His brain registers flashes that we cant necessarily consciously register.

[@ted_ned2109]

Extremely informative and fun! I sobbed on the moment with dog vision reconstruction as my own dog has been gradualy losing sight and it was nice to see the world though his eyes, thank you!

[@animeloveer97]

A tip for your dogs future, don't move things around a lot of don't place things in the floor they map out the house and use objects to guide themselves around! Also make sure they can tell where stairs are or they will fall down them not realizing. They adapt pretty well more surprising than you'd think

[@misomie]

There also devices that can help if your dog ends up goung full blind. I think they're called halo. It's basically the dog equivalent to a cane as it attaches to the collar and if the dog bumps into anything they can get a heads up and stop in time.

[@bk_Syndicate_FL850KH]

The amount I learned in a 16 minute video vs what I learned in a year of HS science is crazy, you definitely earned my subscription your content is fascinating

[@Salem_Gracian]

Take it with a grain of salt. I'm not even halfway through and I've already found quite a few issues with the "you can only see 60fps" argument. There's a lot of pseudoscience here that shouldn't be taken as 100% factual.

[@monoymono9]

thank you!

[@justdrop]

@@Salem_Gracian I was about to respond with the same thing. While it's true that in the past cameras used much less than 60fps, nowadays we run 60+ fps AND while the human eye may not be able to process more than 60 fps, it CAN determine when something is running at 60 and above 60. We can detect the "smoothness" in image transition.

[@ShadowFoxSF]

Had this more explicitly stated to me in my AP Psych class in high school. His class was going to be a broad overview of many psychology topics. From there people generally drill down into more in depth info about more narrow topics in, Say, college. I imagine much of (at least american) schooling never goes very deep into a topic like chemical reactions or atomic structure, biological this&that etc. Etc. Etc. I really enjoy some of these deeper dives though.

[@sluttymctits4496]

@@ShadowFoxSF Is that any surprise? High school is meant for general knowledge for a broad range of students unknown where they'll go in life, while college goes into greater detail about more specific topics for a more focused and tailored education for students of a certain major. I thought everyone knew this? Like OP mentions, one year of high school science class will never go into this much detail, since it can't and it's not intended to. And for the record, my American high school classes DID go into detail about "chemical reaction, atomic structure, and biological this&that," just not nearly as much as my college science classes.

[@fugithegreat]

I'd always wondered if birds must think that the world moves so slowly around them, and I guess this means that they really do! While it's impossible to actually know how another being's experience, this is a pretty cool approximation.

[@kingkringle]

Watched this with my dog... He slept through until he did NOT like the seagull sound at 10:50

[@Grumpah]

Fascinating content. The title doesn't do the video justice. I truly appreciate the explanation of temporal perception in this variety of species, and pointing out the correlation of such in turtles on land vs in water. Also for explaining why my dog will sit and watch one display in my house but not another but my cats will watch any

[@DontYouDareToCallMePolisz]

Dogs need at least 120 frames per second to see movement, while we, humans, need only 15.

[@Grumpah]

@JaOszka not Polish wrong. Like you pulled that dog number out your ass! And humans 16-20. But, WHAT is the point you're tyring to make other than that you are wrong? Please do some research on legitimate material or just go back to playing Angry Birds commrade!!!

[@KibyNykraft]

There is no temporal perception. You and the dog perceive *motions in (a) space* ("a" space because space is infinite +indivisable). Our ways of perceiving motion differs between the species. The motion is irrelevant to this. When we count time we choose objects of reference to measure their internal change of distance. That process is time (time is not existing,it is a word for existing motions that are only at a relative speed)

[@KibyNykraft]

(this is why saying that light does not experience time, does NOT mean that light is standstill or that if you go close to C you are forever young. ☺️✨😊 That's just a song by the band Alphaville)

[@xastrophelia4937]

This is seriously one of the coolest and most informative videos I’ve ever watched. Please do more animal vision videos. 🙏🏼

[@dodgecoates8760]

Watch more videos

[@checkbox197]

I think I still have a few questions about animal sound perception, as this video mainly focused on the time aspect of things, which is only one part of how we perceive sound. 1. If animals have a broader band of recognizable pitches, can they differentiate between them as easily as we can with our smaller range? 2. With the color spectrum we imagine that we all see the same frequencies as the same colors, but this is probably not the case for animals that can see much wider spectrums of colors. Do you think animals rearrange or recalibrate their sound spectrum to fit them? Perhaps their lowest note sounds the same as ours does to us, even if they are different frequencies. 3. Human audio spacialization relies on ILD (volume difference between ears) and ITD (timing difference between ears). We also use our face shape to help determining what's in front of or behind us. What advantages could different face shapes give animals, and do any animals use less or more ears to different effects? It would also be nice to know how much better at spacialization an animal might be if the ITD was easier to make out due to slower time perception. These are probably more easily answered by a philosopher than a scientist, and with a great deal less verifiability, but I would be curious to hear educated speculations or at least explorations of these kinds of ideas in the future.

[@awfuldynne]

I'm a layman, so none of my answers come from special knowledge other than "biology isn't magic" (I cannot express the frustration when it feels like _this_ is "special knowledge"), and they might not qualify as answers. 1. The differentiation between recognizable pitches is going to be a function of how differently two similar pitches affect the sound-detecting mechanisms in the ears (how distinct are the signals the ears send to the brain?) and how much of the brain's processing power is allocated to distinguishing pitch (how different do the signals from the ears need to be before the brain notices a difference?) 2. Imagining a human with a different time perception, because the structures of the ears have not been changed, the perceived pitches of sounds aren't affected. Animals will have a different sound sensitivity curve (or whatever you call the graph that indicates the quietest sound they can perceive at various pitches) and their brains will treat the sounds differently, but I think to the extent that perception can be compared, a sound's pitch is its pitch and doesn't actually need recalibration 3. I'm too stuck thinking about how much I don't know about echolocating bats to process and properly respond to this question. They hunt bugs, so I assume they've got a high "frame rate", and they need to pinpoint those insects in 3 dimensions, so they're going to be excellent at spacialization, at least for pitches similar to the sounds they use to echolocate. They also have interesting face shapes.

[@davidbryden7904]

As I understand it, many animals have a different range of color perception than humans.

[@hexmaniacgabby5160]

We need a part 2 😁

[@jrico153]

So when dogs get really super happy when you get home from doing anything outside. It feels like hours or days have past in a sense so they miss you