Charles Taylor Discusses Meditation and the Lives of Faith Today

  Рет қаралды 13,448

Berkley Center

Berkley Center

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 9
@barblc3202
@barblc3202 4 ай бұрын
love the distinction of those two ways of understanding secularization
@rodrigomadrid9039
@rodrigomadrid9039 6 жыл бұрын
Great lecture, enjoyed it very much, thank you.
@jhonviel7381
@jhonviel7381 3 жыл бұрын
why do people always ask philosophers such difficult questions?
@Adsensestrategist
@Adsensestrategist 8 жыл бұрын
This really was not about meditation, imo.
@kimfreeborn
@kimfreeborn 4 жыл бұрын
Good questions. Poor answers. Taylor's joviality is misplaced. Liberal tolerance and open dialogue can never get to consensus when tolerance is seen as repressive and a privilege of the stronger. Multicultural segregation creates in/outgroups that only further exacerbate ethnic and racial barriers. For these groups the time for dialogue is over and interests have become militant. The relativism of multiculturalism can only trade-off one group's privilege for the other's victimhood. What is to act as the arbiter? Really nothing. Within Taylor's gambit, it all seems rather arbitrary from a rational point of view. Time and arbitration are Taylor's answer. However he has no standard from which to make a decision that would not exclude his own philosophy: his liberal multiculturalism and egalitarianism. Like all Liberals Taylor needs some preordained victim to defend. Yet one can easily question this ordination.
@Joeonline26
@Joeonline26 3 жыл бұрын
Stick to uploading crappy lo-fi
@kimfreeborn
@kimfreeborn 3 жыл бұрын
@@Joeonline26 Actually one of the things I like about Taylor is his admission that his answers are crappy.
@Joeonline26
@Joeonline26 3 жыл бұрын
@@kimfreeborn lol what?
@kimfreeborn
@kimfreeborn 3 жыл бұрын
​@@Joeonline26 Perhaps Taylor's joviality is misplaced. Liberal tolerance and open dialogue can never get to consensus when tolerance is seen as repressive and a privilege of the stronger. Multicultural segregation creates in/outgroups that only further exacerbate ethnic and racial barriers. For these groups the time for dialogue is over and interests have become militant. The relativism of multiculturalism can only trade-off one group's privilege for the other's victimhood. What is to act as the arbiter? Really nothing. Within Taylor's gambit, it all seems rather arbitrary from a rational point of view. Time and arbitration are Taylor's answer. However he has no standard from which to make a decision that would not exclude his own philosophy: his liberal multiculturalism and egalitarianism. Like all Liberals Taylor needs some preordained victim to defend. Yet one can easily question this ordination.
Charles Taylor: Re-imagining the Role of Religions in Public Life
1:24:24
The Secular Age in a Global Context
1:18:56
SOFHeyman
Рет қаралды 7 М.
World’s strongest WOMAN vs regular GIRLS
00:56
A4
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Não sabe esconder Comida
00:20
DUDU e CAROL
Рет қаралды 57 МЛН
ЗНАЛИ? ТОЛЬКО ОАЭ 🤫
00:13
Сам себе сушист
Рет қаралды 3,7 МЛН
Charles Taylor: A Conversation with Michael Rosen - October 25, 2018
1:48:52
Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Ethics Harvard
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Charles Taylor: The Polysemy of ‘Religion’
1:31:28
IWMVienna
Рет қаралды 5 М.
The Gospel according to St John, read by Sir David Suchet
2:23:58
Westminster Abbey
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
The Inner Self - Charles Taylor (1988)
1:20:54
Philosophy Overdose
Рет қаралды 32 М.
The Mystery of Consciousness: Dr. Iain McGilchrist’s Keynote at Kinross House (2024)
1:00:54
The Wonderstruck Podcast with Elizabeth Rovere
Рет қаралды 83 М.
Democracy, Diversity, Religion
1:26:01
LSE
Рет қаралды 10 М.
The World at War (Ralph Raico) - Libertarianism.org
3:06:00
Libertarianism.org
Рет қаралды 321 М.
Charles Taylor on «The Life of the Church in a Secular Age»
33:32
World’s strongest WOMAN vs regular GIRLS
00:56
A4
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН