You should do this for every surface, I'd be interested in seeing that.
@chadcat4202 ай бұрын
Federer and Djokovic I believe have the most match wins ever
@MMerlyn912 ай бұрын
@@chadcat420 I'm interested in the larger statistics about the rest of the players.
@HeavyTopspin2 ай бұрын
You'd simply find the best players. Clay is the only surface where you have all-time greats who are garbage on other surfaces, including some who didn't even bother to play other surfaces, while also having overall greats of the sport who never had any success on clay.
@MMerlyn912 ай бұрын
@@HeavyTopspinNot sure that's true for grass especially in the last 30 years or so, but I'd be interested in the statistics any way.
@HeavyTopspin2 ай бұрын
@@MMerlyn91 Can't make a living on the ATP tour as a grass specialist.
@honey_badger9869Ай бұрын
Grande Vilas!!! Also love to see Thomas Muster so high up. All that success after recovering from that horrific car accident.
@Carlos-v9z3s2 ай бұрын
Siete españoles entre los 16 primeros durante muchos años. Impresionante.
@carlosruizdapena36922 ай бұрын
Y 5 entre los 10 primeros
@masterblaster623019 күн бұрын
@@Carlos-v9z3s La famosa Armada Española
@oscarpandre66072 ай бұрын
Enorme Guillermo con 672 partidos
@nfltrrrqwsa751216 күн бұрын
un gran ex numero 1 del mundo...
@Xingqiwu3872 ай бұрын
NADAL is THE master of clay bar none. He is in a league of his own, an entirely new category.
@juanarambarri512Ай бұрын
but Vilas has 200 more wins than him on clay!
@fotonx86Ай бұрын
@@juanarambarri512 Vilas just won Roland Garros once, the most important tournament on clay.
@fotonx86Ай бұрын
And Rafa?
@juanarambarri512Ай бұрын
@@fotonx86 rafa many more... so it depends which stat you focus on
@fotonx86Ай бұрын
@@juanarambarri512 I think that's clear Rafa is the best clay tennis player ever.
@carlossimancas98672 ай бұрын
Este vídeo deja muy claro que Manuel Orantes fue un tenista sensacional, y que hace cincuenta años se jugaban muchísimos torneos en arcilla. Luego vinieron las pistas duras, que favorecían a los norteamericanos, y la cosa cambió
@ortiz59222 ай бұрын
Lo típico, el mundo anglosajón siempre destruyendo la hispanidad
@almirCCRАй бұрын
Siempre he sentido que se desmerecía lo que hizo Orantes y ya retirados Santana estaba en todas las salsas.
@carlossimancas9867Ай бұрын
@@almirCCR Fue un top ten que después de retirarse llevó una vida discreta. Bruguera es un caso parecido. Los que los vieron jugar los recuerdan como lo que fueron, dos enormes tenistas
@siyobonga18 күн бұрын
431 wins with over %91 win rate is unreal.
@freda39952 ай бұрын
What is missing in this overview is that till an certain date clay was THE underground to play one. Hardcourt came up and therefore great players like Rafael are not high on this list. But nice to see all these oldies on the list 😊
@christophera2606Ай бұрын
Nadal is too good to be number 1 on the list. He was busy winning Wimbledon and US/Australian Open.
@diegoguerreroVOАй бұрын
Grande Willy!!!
@MMerlyn912 ай бұрын
Also, as a Romanian I am extremely proud seeing Nastase there, in the beginning of the video there was Tiriac as well, even if he was mainly a doubles player.
@danbotez13079 күн бұрын
Da, Ilie este numarul 5 din Open Era. Intradevar remarcabil.
@stevesworld96802 ай бұрын
Fascinating job on this video. Thanks for sharing and taking us down memory lane.
@hendrik196012 ай бұрын
incredible Kent Rosewall, 77 % rate in the Open era, and he was 34 when open era began !!
@pablolb32402 ай бұрын
Goat material but he's never included! The 4th of the Big4
@masterblaster623019 күн бұрын
Los títulos de Nadal son incomparables, y 14 son de Rolanga, algo impresionante, sin dudas el más grande de polvo de ladrillo de todos los tiempos. Por eso, que Vilas le haya sacado casi 200 victorias de diferencia,habla de la hazaña de Guillermo, uno de los jugadores más subestimados de la historia, el máximo ganador de partidos en clay de la historia. Y creo que va a ser dificilisimo que alguien le bata ese récord.
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qi19 күн бұрын
Hoy en día es imposible, porque la gira de arcilla es muy corta. No dura casi todo el año como hace 50 años.
@Giochochu14 күн бұрын
Es imposible conseguirlo actualmente porque hace 50 años las giras de arcilla duraban todo año y en la actualidad son muy cortas
@estebanbarabas2762 ай бұрын
Grande Willy Vilas!!!
@eMeNeSeRocK2309Ай бұрын
¡Grande Guillermo Vilas!, tremendamente profesional y talentoso... ❤️🇦🇷❤️
@SusanaAguayoCastilloАй бұрын
Tan talentoso que no le llega a Nadal ni a la suela de los zapatos. Si hubiera ganado torneos grandes, y tuviera un mayor porcentaje de partidos ganados...
@charlesbulsara981Ай бұрын
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo no te atendió tu marido que tenes tanto odio acumulado?
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qi28 күн бұрын
@@charlesbulsara981 Vilas sólo tiene más victorias que Nadal porque jugó en una era diferente, donde los torneos en tierra batida eran aproximadamente la mitad de los torneos totales. Ahora son un 30% y gracias. Gran tenista de todas formas.
@FernandoOrias2 ай бұрын
Un orgullo Argentino, Guillermo Vilas....
@nfltrrrqwsa751216 күн бұрын
numero 2 del mundo tambien. enorme
@diegosciuto807213 күн бұрын
@@nfltrrrqwsa7512 por un error del sistema de puntuación automático, que debido a ello la ATP modificó a partir de 1978, de lo contrario en 1977 Vilas hubiese sido el 1 sin dudas.
@tarikdebarge7 күн бұрын
Great post! Grass next?
@IvanPetrov-rs1kqАй бұрын
Vilas had 736 clay wins, Orantes - 574, Nastase - 451, Lendl - 367. Maybe you miss many matches of the older guys.
@TheTradgeАй бұрын
Nadal may not have had the longevity of Vilas or Orantes, but at his peak he was pretty much unbeatable by 99.99% of players on clay, especially at Roland Garros! Vilas in particular a) played a LOT more tournaments, and b) retired at age 40, but he lost more matches
@berdi4berdi4Ай бұрын
Nope. Vilas retired at 36, earlier than Nadal.
@raily97132 ай бұрын
nadal got plus 93% ratio in the middle of his active period... just ridiculous
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Era un bug del tennis sulla terra battuta.
@mateosimon42372 ай бұрын
Impresionante Vilas!!😳 No se habla tanto de él pero tiene una estadística que deja corto a Rafa, incluso con menos años en el circuito inclusive
@carlosfnd_38262 ай бұрын
Hombre, en esos años la mayoría de torneos eran en tierra batida pero si, era una locura de tenista
@antonioroman7152 ай бұрын
No se pueden ni comparar, pero es una leyenda de la tierra también Vilas. Vi su documental sobre como le robaron el numero 1, muy interesante.
@miguelotero40932 ай бұрын
en la epoca de vilas la inmensa mayoria de los partidos se jugaba en clay... vilas nunca gano 10 veces el mismo torneo o 14 veces RG pd:.... y borg lo tenia de hijo !!😂
@SusanaAguayoCastilloАй бұрын
Su estadística es que pierde más partidos que Nadal. La eficacia de Nadal, ganando más del 90% de sus partidos es inigualable.
@mateosimon4237Ай бұрын
@@miguelotero4093 No, no ganó diez majors del mismo torneo, pero ganó 4 grand slam y mas de 60 torneos. Cuántos ganaste vos fantasmón?
@angelatanurdzic75082 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video 👍
@KikiQrr2 ай бұрын
Nice Video
@georgea18652 ай бұрын
Surprised not to see Courier and Kuerten
@josepotenza71402 ай бұрын
Vilas numero 1¡¡¡
@amethyst28232 ай бұрын
Nastase was pretty good too!
@jorgelopez-vc7pdАй бұрын
Vilas le gano a Nastase 6/0 6/0 en Montecarlo 1981
@benopincu6188Ай бұрын
@@jorgelopez-vc7pd So? Nastase's high point was 1972-73. 1981 is irrelevant.
@danbotez13079 күн бұрын
@@jorgelopez-vc7pd This is a ridiculous tidbit. Nastase was de facto retired by 1981.
@yahoo88442 ай бұрын
WaoOoW Guillermo !! 👏🏻♥️
@graymapping2 ай бұрын
borg comfortably at the top for win rate: *rafael nadal has entered the chat*
@hendrik196012 ай бұрын
retired at 25 y old, you don't have " comfortably " that rate when you're 33
@ErrkaPetti2 ай бұрын
Ha! Say that to Roger & Novak when they was 33!
@milanm4032 ай бұрын
@@ErrkaPetti They are both better teniss players than Nadal😀😁😁😁
@antoinev97332 ай бұрын
@@milanm403... Out of clay 😊
@alinc34912 ай бұрын
So proud to see Ilie Nastase so high on the top for so long!
@mima1672 ай бұрын
Nastaste was in the top 5 of his era, but in all of tennis history he wasn't in the top 10 most clay court match victories
@alinc34912 ай бұрын
@@mima167 the video shows differently than what you are saying
@mmascitti6 күн бұрын
Vilas un grande!👏
2 ай бұрын
Gran final al vídeo.
@CoolCoyote7 күн бұрын
Năstase was a great player, didnt know he was great on clay. I think he was federer before federer er except for his erratic temperament and he never won Wimbledon which is like sampras never winning on clay, its that outrageous to think. Năstase has the all-time highest winning percentage (88%, 22 wins and only 3 losses) in the year ending tournaments (today ATP Tour Finals) winning four times, in 1971, 1972, 1973 and 1975. He is one of the five tennis players (third place) in the world who won more than 100 pro titles (57 singles and 45 doubles) according to the ATP website, though there are many titles that are not included in the ATP statistics. Năstase was the first professional sports figure to sign an endorsement contract with Nike.
@karagravis2 ай бұрын
6:27 THE CLAY KING WAS BORN
@milanm4032 ай бұрын
Hey Shut TFU with that clay king. ITS tenniss. Who is ,,return'' king? HARDCOURT KING? ATP KING?
@almirCCRАй бұрын
Big Mc dont play in clay. Borg was the best ❤
@corey7219Ай бұрын
5:23
@WonderWhatHappened2 ай бұрын
I thought Eddie Dibbs best claim to fame was the term "bagel" but he's in Top 10 all time in Single clay matches.
@tuvieja9704Ай бұрын
Guillermo solo encampeonatos de baja categoría..
@BlackPalateАй бұрын
672 !!!! Willy always The Best !!!!!!!!!
@berdi4berdi4Ай бұрын
Guillermo Vilas = underrated player
@jmilne5751Ай бұрын
How many titles/slams did he win on clay compared to Nadal with some 200 less wins??
@DisgutstadoАй бұрын
@@jmilne5751 Bro, the guy is saying that Vilas is underrated, nothing more, he doesn't compare to one of the GOATS like Rafa, just that, relax your butts
@jmilne5751Ай бұрын
@@Disgutstado I think Vilas is Over rated... So many clay court wins for how many clay titles...ONLY 1 RG...Must of played plenty of weak players, but failed when it counted?? against good players...
@berdi4berdi4Ай бұрын
@@jmilne5751Vilas set a record for the longest winning streak on clay courts in the Open Era with 53 consecutive victories in 1977. The streak was ended by Nastase with the forbidden doible strings. Of course, no player is at the level of Nadal, no sh*t Sherlock. My point is that Vilas is underrated if you look at what he achieved.
@berdi4berdi4Ай бұрын
@@jmilne5751 weak players? Like beating Mc Enroe 6 times? Connors 4 times? Nastase 7 times? Borg 5 times? Orantes 7 times? What other "weak" player you want on the list? Vilas had a stellar career and defeated all top player during his time.
@wzarattin2 ай бұрын
hace 42 años que el máximo ganador en arcilla es Guillermo Vilas . Ganó 21% mas que el segundo Manuel Orantes. Ganó 46% mas que el tercero Rafael Nadal. Ganó 57% mas que el cuarto Tomas Muster. Ganó 66% mas que el quinto Ilie Nastase. Ganó la misma cantidad de partidos que la suma de los partidos que ganó el octavo (Carlos Moya) + los que ganó el noveno (David Ferrer). Vilas figura como el sexto mejor porcentaje de partidos ganados de 79,9%, detras de Nadal (1ro con 88,74%), detras de Borg (segundo con 85,71%), detras de Lendl (tercero con 81,03%), detras de Djokovic (cuarto con 80,74%) y detras de Alcaraz (quinto con 80,11%), Pero supera en porcentaje al tercero, al cuarto y al quinto cuando se toma el porcentaje de partidos ganados cuando tenia 483 partidos ganados (cantidad de partidos ganados en arcilla de Rafael Nadal). Cuando Vilas llego a 483 partidos ganados en arcilla, que es mucho mas de lo que ganaron Borg, Lendl, Djokovic y Alcaraz, el porcentaje de partidos ganados era de 84,8%, que es casi el de Borg (que apenas ganó 282 partidos en arcilla) y esta cerca del porcentaje de Nadal.
@eMeNeSeRocK2309Ай бұрын
Un animal era el Willy, tremendamente profesional y talentoso. Saludos ❤️🇦🇷❤️
@SusanaAguayoCastilloАй бұрын
¿Y qué títulos tiene? El mérito es de que la inmensa mayoría de los títulos eran en tierra, con razón se jugaban muchos más partidos. Así cualquiera.
@wzarattinАй бұрын
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo Vilas gano 49 titulo en arcilla, y esta segundo detras de Nadal que ganó 59.
@wzarattinАй бұрын
@@SusanaAguayoCastillo no entendí eso de "Así cualquiera", que seria lo facil?. tampoco eso de "con razón se jugaban mas partidos" estás diciendo que se jugaban mas partidos porque era en arcilla? si es eso, te cuento que eso es equivocado.
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qiАй бұрын
@@wzarattin Nadal ganó 63, no 59
@claudiolopez785714 сағат бұрын
Vilas!❤
@rushrush120917 күн бұрын
Interesting how Nadal shot up right to the top in 2006 with the best win percentage on clay. He's 3rd all time in wins on clay, but there's no doubt he's the GOAT on clay.
@redtesta2 ай бұрын
i got really sad. Seeing all those names from the past i was lucky to be able to watch. Some i was to young for but others i remember them well. Its like all of them are battling on that board like playing a match, trading places , back and forth then someone stands out for awhile. Then you start to see them fade. A couple that came up together , slowly fading out as they start to leave the game of Tennis and then, they are gone. Then the next group and same thing and they fade out and then, gone. Sad. I see bjorn borg, conors, Nastase , Lendl etc and they are gone. Then it was sampras, agassi etc . Now, we see two of the three trilogy step down. So sad but feel blessed i was alive to see them all. ( should have been a minimum amount of wins or plays. Someone could have barely played 10 times like in the case for alcarez not sure he should be up there since he barely had turned pro and doesn't have total numbers for clay under his belt)
@danbotez13079 күн бұрын
I share your nostalgia. We have been blessed to see many great players from Nastase to Alcaraz.
@al1976-v7mАй бұрын
Wow never thought Carlos Moya was so high up
@emilio4968Ай бұрын
Me sorprende que Rafa no sea el num1. Grande Vilas
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qiАй бұрын
Eso es debido a que en los setenta se jugaban más torneos en tierra batida que ahora, donde sólo es 1/3 del circuito.
@sammcguinness449924 күн бұрын
Y no te sorprende que haya ganado más del 90% en tierra?
@jerseyneil12 ай бұрын
This list is misleading. Vilas won more clay court matches than Borg, but Vilas was no match for Borg. The only French title won by Vilas was 1977, when Borg did not play. The following year Vilas was helpless in his match with Borg. Until Nadal came along, Borg was considered the greatest clay courter of all time.
@ofall46432 ай бұрын
He retired too early
@thebigmonstaandy66442 ай бұрын
Djokovic and Kuerten are not even in this list
@milanm4032 ай бұрын
@@thebigmonstaandy6644 Yes, Djokovic is the GOAT in tenniss. Nadal is not existing in ATP records!!!!!!
@thebigmonstaandy66442 ай бұрын
@@milanm403 Nadal is Goat on clay, Djokovic GOAT in general
@edinmilenko13402 ай бұрын
do you know.why Borg didn't play in 1977?
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Vilas può a ben ragione essere il numero 2 o il numero 3, ci sta. Ma il numero 1 sulla terra battuta non credo sia in discussione da parte di nessuno al mondo. È l'imperatore assoluto del clay.
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qi28 күн бұрын
El número 2 es Borg y el número 3 seguramente sea Djokovic.
@jonathanvelazquezph.d.27192 ай бұрын
Guillermo Vilas has the most wins on clay but is not even in the top 5 players in terms of win rate. Very interesting 🙃 Wonderful job and wonderful background music 🎶
@ferchotix92 ай бұрын
He is 6th
@jonathanvelazquezph.d.27192 ай бұрын
@@ferchotix9 Thanks. I missed him. I'll edit the comment. 🤭
@ChenChen-yz6xj2 ай бұрын
@@jonathanvelazquezph.d.2719672 wins and 169 losses according to the video...for me that might be more impressive than Ivan Lendl's 329-77😅
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Perché in quel periodo veniva battuto regolarmente da Borg, ha vinto 5 partite e ne ha perse 17 contro Borg.
@Kvbftng2 ай бұрын
Very surprised I thought had more wins, I would like to see his hard court wins
@milanm4032 ай бұрын
Not worth mentioning! Hard court not very goos!! Grass 0!
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qiАй бұрын
@@milanm403 Nadal is top 5 of all time on hard
@MrPiccoloFan2 ай бұрын
So Ferrero had a winning percentage peak on clay similar to Lendl :O
@Kritiker782 ай бұрын
Rafael Nadals percent rating till 2023 is constantly between 91-92%.
@milanm4032 ай бұрын
Because he missed many. many hard cour tournaments but NEVER clay. Only ONE missed French Open. Man who was injured a lot never missed FO.
@bobyvolley56392 ай бұрын
so of all active players (without Nadal) the top 3 with the best win rate are: Djokovic 80,74 % Alcaraz 80,11% Tsitsipas 75,31% ok wow so Tsitsipas in the top 20 of ALL TIME. 😳 it's such a shame that he doesn't understand how badly he needs a new coach. although he claims that he has separated from his father, his father still sits somewhere in the audience at every tournament and stefanos constantly makes eye contact.
@sammcguinness449924 күн бұрын
Pero a quien cojones le importa psipsipas??
@Summon256Ай бұрын
The better way to determine is to use 100+ match wins frame of reference and calculate win rate based on that...
@ricardovillasante911622 сағат бұрын
No entiendo el final del vídeo aclarando lo de Nadal si el mayor ganador en polvo de ladrillo fue Vilas!
@racing7782Ай бұрын
Guillermo Vilas is goat tier in clay
@robert111kАй бұрын
Hahahaha
@かなりえずきスラム常盤平団地2 ай бұрын
6:28 ナグル!登場!💪
@snickaren1112 ай бұрын
90's king of clay: Muster, Early 00's KoC: Kuerten, From 05 and onwards KOC: Nadal.
@telmolicious2 ай бұрын
Muster won the most clay court matches in the 90s but only 1 FO compared to Jim and Sergios 2.
@SebastianSaavedra282 ай бұрын
Incredible Nole with a 80%+ winrate in every surface.
@danbotez13079 күн бұрын
It just goes to show the winning percentages are misleading as far as overall success. Roland Garros has been Djokovic's worst Slam by far.
@prosenlund1975Ай бұрын
Nadal with over 90% win rate... Insane
@ivansevillanoferri47602 күн бұрын
91% ratio nadal. Oh my god
@fredodomino46352 ай бұрын
Where's Gustavo Kuerten ??
@WeLoveTennisYoutube2 ай бұрын
181 wins #64, 69.88% win rate # 35
@darting100Ай бұрын
kent carlsson ,the nadal of the 80,s had maybe more top spin than nadal but had to retire at 21 because of A knee injury
@VideotvnewsАй бұрын
EL MEJOR RAFAEL NADAL DISO TE BENDIGA SIEMPRE RAFA GRACIAS POR TODO TU EJEMPLO DEPORTIVO SIEMPRE RAFA NADAL
@skyjuke2006Ай бұрын
BJORN BORG🇸🇪 WAS MY IDOL AND STILL IS.
@slicedbreadrocks8 күн бұрын
Shooking that Nadal wasn't number one on most wins.
@dharmendia2 ай бұрын
Thank you Rafa for rest of the time.
@NR-ov6po2 ай бұрын
On hard & grass its federer followed by djoker but djoker has best win percent in hard & also 14 wins away from 300 on clay .
@jmilne5751Ай бұрын
True test of endurance, patience and skill....There is ONLY 1...Nadal at over 90% win ratio, 14 Roland Garros...NEVER will be beaten....
@teodm9785 күн бұрын
Y... somo los mejores del mundo 🇦🇷
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qi2 күн бұрын
Vilas tiene más victorias, pero pocos GS y M1000 en arcilla. Eso sí, también jugó más torneos en arcilla, muy muy abundantes en la década de los setenta.
@GudulaBavon13 күн бұрын
No hay mujeres jugando al tenis en tierra batida? Me extraña
@jesusfranco11 күн бұрын
Which is the best country on clay and why is Spain?
@danbotez13079 күн бұрын
A better question is: Why 7 of the top 10 winningest players are Latin ?
@juanetedelto2 ай бұрын
5 españoles entre los 10 primeros ... Y alcaraz en camino...Un español es normal pero si tiene que liarla en francia se convierte en hulk😂
@BTURNER19612 ай бұрын
Unless you put the wins in the context of the losses as a percentage won, instead of total number accumulated over years and years there is no context. 1992 2nd rd loss by Lendl to unseeded Jaime Oncins at 1992 RG, becomes a success story rather than a dismal failure, if the loss is not registered statistically. The fact that you are only including ATP sanctioned events is a tremendous disadvantage to players half of who's prime years was lost before it existed. Carlson winning Kitzbulhel Austria in 1988, is treated the same as Laver winning RG in 1969 when Carlson never got past the 4th rd at the French. That's why kent Carlson has both a higher number and percentage than Rod Laver. Pay attention to the limitations as well as the strengths in the measurements.
@smftrsddvjiou644316 күн бұрын
The Spainiards.
@weetabixharry2 ай бұрын
6:27 The reason you're here ;)
@jmilne5751Ай бұрын
Strange how Nadal is top 5 on Harcourt wins, yet I don't even see Novak in top 15 here... Just shows how extraordinary Nadal truly is
@KarinaPOLSKAАй бұрын
You confuse stuff that's why you don't know how to read data . On left if number of wins and right się win %. Novak is nr 4 in winning % on Clay in history. He is all surfaces extraordinary. But these westerners hate that now UK or USA is the best so they are always trying to present some data where Nadal or Federer are the best. All scare to admit that some poor Serbian Christian is the best ever . They hate it
@jmilne5751Ай бұрын
@@KarinaPOLSKA Sorry but he is NOT best ever... Court, Graf & Williams ALL have better records... You are 1 of those narrow minded idiots that WON'T accept FACT!!!!!
@henry-bo3np11 күн бұрын
The "Best ATP Tennis Players on Clay" are: (1) Rafa Nadal at 100%; (2) Rafa Nadal at 90%; (3) Rafa Nadal at 80%. After that it's argue amongst yourselves. (Bjorn Borg maybe?)
@irtidense2 ай бұрын
RAFAEL NADAL es el indiscutible REY de la tierra batida
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Nessun dubbio, se la gente ha occhi per guardare.
@pablosacarzello360420 күн бұрын
Vilas.....no comments .
@carlosalonso16708 күн бұрын
Have you ever heard of a Rafa Nadal ?
@andresdiazvelez3176Ай бұрын
You should also say “thank you Guille”. In this ranking, still the goat
@SusanaAguayoCastilloАй бұрын
The goat of what? In his era, there were many tournaments in clay, more than nowadays. As you can see, Nadal is extremely efective, winnig 9 out 10 matches. Also, Nadal winning 14 RG.
@smftrsddvjiou644316 күн бұрын
Funny, no Federer, no Djorkovic
@pascalfischer4948Ай бұрын
Boris Becker???😂😂😅😅
@KratosConstantine9 күн бұрын
BRICK DUST... VILAS KING!!
@giovannilazzarini97022 ай бұрын
How much time for Jannick to get there?
@ErrkaPetti2 ай бұрын
As long Jannik Sinner can use Clostebol without consequences him maybe can get on this list, but, WADA/CAS hopefully will ban him 18 month really soon.
@TriggeredMonkey2 ай бұрын
@@ErrkaPetti Even using PEDs he won't do jack on clay. His game isn't suited for the surface and he won't beat Alcaraz there.
@MrCesko9642 ай бұрын
@@ErrkaPetti hopefully you get sick soon.... wait, you're already very sick, very mentally sick.
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Jannik su terra battuta non ci arriverà, su cemento credo di sì.
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
@@MrCesko964non rispondergli, gli stupidi lasciali a loro stessi, mio consiglio spassionato.
@TheSportsPROgram8 күн бұрын
No One comes close to Nadal on clay ....period.
@Sadpianest2 ай бұрын
We're want hard and grass
@User786ADM2 ай бұрын
Después quieren comparar a vilas con kuerten o ríos jajja. No tienen comparación!!! No le llegan a los tobillos
@acapavlovic85242 ай бұрын
There is no Djoković and Federer. LOL
@SebastianSaavedra282 ай бұрын
Nole is top4 in win rate
@acapavlovic85242 ай бұрын
@@SebastianSaavedra28 I saw that, but still... 🤣
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Forse hai visto male, 4° all time come win rate, fenomeno anche su terra battuta.
@isaactuscqАй бұрын
Lot of spanish guys
@cobex66532 ай бұрын
GOATOVIĆ
@brunomaelstrom8823Ай бұрын
This video is a big joke … Borg only half way there … Nadal only third …A serious work should integrate the weight of each tournament in the calculation …
@obellaciaoАй бұрын
Fino al 2011 non c'è traccia di Nadal......
@AAK1954Сағат бұрын
¿Haces un video de los mayores triunfadores en polvo de ladrillo... y sobre el final cierras homenajeando al español Nadal, siendo que el triunfador de ESTA estadística fue por lejos el argentino Guillermo Vilas? Jejé: chauvinismo descarado. Puede que el Rafa sea el mejor de la historia sobre esa superficie, pero ese no es el título del video...
@Summon256Ай бұрын
Match wins per surface is the most useless stat, if you need any further proof just look at this list starting with 296 wins...no Wilander, Djokovic or Kuerten, all 3-times RG winners, but you have slamless nobodies you never even heard of like Emilio Sanchez, Jose Luis Clerc or Balazs Taroczy...what a joke...
@pablo242625 күн бұрын
Just a video on nadal to glorify him . Why u don’t make same videos on others grounds ? U are afraid of djokovic the GOAT?
@WeLoveTennisYoutube25 күн бұрын
Are you sure I didn't?
@pablo242624 күн бұрын
@@WeLoveTennisKZbin sorry i haven’t seen .
@anthonyagard76072 ай бұрын
First.
@davidcb49462 ай бұрын
Alcaraz goat
@ricardov.51382 ай бұрын
Me da igual el número de victorias. Rafael Nadal es el mejor jugador de tierra batida de la Historia. Se le puede preguntar a Orantes, a Vilas y a cualquiera que este vivo de esa lista. Todos le dirán lo mismo. Si se hace un ránking, que sea del tenista con MAYOR NÚMERO DE VICTORIAS en tierra batida. Pero no de los mejores. Vilas no es mejor que Nadal. Orantes no es mejor que Nadal. Ni en tierra batida.
@manumalia2 ай бұрын
Obviamente Rafa es el mejor y su récord de RG va a durar mucho mucho tiempo.
@carlosruizdapena36922 ай бұрын
Así es
@matmax68342 ай бұрын
Neanche nelle favole possono essere miglioro di Rafa.
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qiАй бұрын
Esta estadística tiene trampa y es que hace 50 años se jugaba mucho más en arcilla que ahora, donde sólo 1/3 parte del circuito es arcilla.
@tomaslewis7208Ай бұрын
Vilas fue el mejor tenista en polvo de ladrillo. Punto.
@AlejandroGarcia-wz1qiАй бұрын
Pues no. ¿Donde están sus Roland Garros? ¿Dónde están sus Masters?