Best Shots | Indian Wells | Day 7

Subscribe to WTA on KZbin: www.youtube.com...
Like WTA on Facebook: / wta
Follow WTA on Twitter: / wta
More Videos: www.wtatennis.com

[@MrCostabravo]

The last point is incredible!

[@newtonfirefly3584]

@ WTA ; @ Ashutosh Mishra ; @ Tom O Mahony ; The issue is not the WTA video editor or possibly the manager in charge of the editor or the producer, rather the person(s) in charge and responsible for deciding the direction and manner these videos should be produced. Actually, these IW WTA videos [and those of the tournament itself] are a significant improvement over the 2 and 3 minute videos of more recent production and uploading! They do need to be improved more, certainly, in presenting a balanced and more complete set of highlights. Sincerely, :-)

[@newtonfirefly3584]

@ WTA ; a good compilation of many high level, highly contested points from three of WTA matches from Day 7 @ IW 2019. Ahhh, Yes there were also of them, three top level shots too. Seems the Title is incorrect?!! Perhaps the Title should be: Top Level Points & Shots | Indian Wells | Day 7 ?!! Also, were there not other nite worthy, presentation worthy points from the other WTA matches of the day in Singles and Doubles?! Another point : This video length is nearly the length of the highlights video from Venus William vs Mona Barthel R4 match [~7 min], while the other matches are typically ~ 6 min. which include the player introductions. Not the worst produced WTA highlight videos and an improvement from the 2-3 min highlight videos of more recent production. Still, significantly insufficient to give any proper flavor, taste, view, perspective and perception of the match and just a slight improvement from seeing the score line and statistics [which a complete set give many more aspects than these videos highlights do. The often bias in these videos is also very noticeable too [also from most of the commentators too (Kim Clijsters and other former top, champion players are often excellent commentators and the best too)]. (This British commentator, though it may he has tennis knowledge and experience, is actually a poor commentator, with obvious bias, and mispronounces names so often. He even still can't even get Naomi Osaka's name pronounced correctly! Most still think and pronounce her first name as if the 'a' is long, but actually it is a short 'a' sound and the 'o' is long, so it is Na(h)-O-mee. (It is a name used in the Bible, which is similarly mispronounced, from Hebrew, and was incorrectly transliterated, and it actually should be Na-Awh-mee.). Her last mane is Japanese, and the 's' should be sounded properly, not like a 'z' nor a soft 'z' either nor a 'sz' (her last name nearly correct a few times during this tournament, almost sounding like with an 's'). All combined, he is dreadful to listen to. Am not aware who chooses the announcers, but something needs to be done! There are so many good, excellent women and men, former professional tennis players and coaches who have continued into and many continued to be commentators in broadcasting. There should be more and primary use of them. Over the decades there have been and are a few, very good commentators for tennis that are not former professionals too. Sincerely, :-)

[@himbo88]

You really need a better editor. Happy to offer my services

[@GreenLight5444]

Editor needs to be fired ASAP

[@julielucky24]

WTA youtube channel, you are ridiculous! I would fire all the employees for this low quality content.