Between and Within Subject Designs

[@regularfather4708]

I never thought it possible to both understand a subject and be completely confused by it at the same time... and then I took Research Methods in Psychology. Thank you for making it a tiny bit less confusing.

[@shreyaaashree]

lmaooo samee😂😂😂

[@missposh2007]

After two years of my degree i finally get it! Turns out only needed two words to understand it. Thank you !!

[@paulwarwick1511]

This has been boggling me for the last few hours, thanks to your video i get it! I get uni is suppose to be difficult but its never done in the way you just displayed! thank you so much for this video!

[@BrookeMiller]

Glad I could help!

[@DuelyusSeazer]

Yea agreed. My lectures are unnecessarily overcomplicated. Explain it in the most simple terms and allow me to formulate more complex scenarios myself to expand my own understanding

[@mochiwaffles]

I have found you just in time right before finals week! Thank you much.

[@danathralls1277]

I have a test in pysch research methods today and this was super helpful thank you!!

[@davidbennett7450]

Utilizing a "control" group does not necessarily mean it's within, right? If you're comparing the outcomes from one group to a control group, that would still be between, correct? For the example with the lung capacity, seeing how effective the drug is, and over time... If it were to be seen if it was effective at all, wouldn't that be between? You're comparing A and B, drug and no drug, to see which is different. In a way, isn't it like comparing the heavy, light, and non-smokers as explicitly shown in the "between" example?

[@kuduzdoktorhektor]

That's right, she is giving a "mixed design" example, not a within-subjects design.

[@arjundesilva-universityofk7668]

Simple and well explained thank you

[@batrisyiariadz846]

It took me awhile to understand this in class but it only took me 1 minute to understand the difference after watching your video. Thank you so much and may god bless you!

[@ArsshiSingh356]

Nicely Explained

[@CestLaVie247]

Nice! I liked the clarity of it all. Thanks.

[@piepo5002]

Watched and read a lot about this subject. Your video is the first one that explained it really well. Thank you for giving me more knowledge ;)

[@nikolasstepan2269]

thank you a lot for the information, helps a lot.

[@mariamccaughey4540]

this was so helpful and informative. Thank you!

[@fatensalah1833]

well explained...thank you so much

[@user-zr1cr5kv2e]

thanks, well defined concept

[@Bdmaurice]

Great video! I know this is a moot point, but how do you write that well with a mouse? I mean, that's just impressive!

[@Lmartinezwilliams]

It is so helpful, Thank you very much!!

[@marketajankovcova3010]

Hi, may I ask you? It is possible to have pretest-posttest design as part of the within subject design? It does not exclude it? Or it is already between subject design? My plan is to have experimental group (50 people), which get treatment, and control group (50 people), which does not get treatment. My intention is to see the influence of the treatment. Thank you for your response.

[@samithherath567]

Thank you very much

[@tommyvz84]

thanks

[@shepherdmixnova5283]

THANK YOU !!!!!!

[@forparasocialpurposesonly]

Made it easyyyyyyyyyy

[@esmeraldasanchez316]

thank you very much wohooo lol

[@onetruth5073]

Your voice sounds like alvin the chipmunk