How Waterproof Casio G-Shock really is? Deep Sea Test

[@chrishince8947]

What time is it when your 2km underwater? Time to get a new watch!

[@Xeridanus]

And lungs and blood vessels and well, anything made of soft tissue. Your bones might be fine. Might...

[@Thedoug369]

Time for an undertaker!

[@bitkarek]

its time to die.

[@mrnmrn1]

After going that deep, all you need to get is a coffin...

[@Pentti_Hilkuri]

It's "I don't care anymore" time.

[@John-ym9ht]

It's satisfying to find products that actually perform to and beyond their ratings. There seems to be so much false advertising out there. Well done G- Shock!

[@jarekpszuk6944]

Casio watches are notoriously good in water resistance, even the 10 dollar Casio F91W is able to survive scuba diving trips with advertised 30 meter water resistance.

[@AlexKall]

I remember a TV show or something that tested one long time ago, they even bbqed the watch, the plastic melted and the display cut out as long as it was on the BBQ, but as soon as it was removed it worked flawlessly. Impressive watches! Had one of those with 10 year battery and it did hold out for at least 8 years which is impressive as I used the backlight quite a lot. The only thing bad was the backlight button as it was just a thin bit of metal which broke of. I took it apart but didn't get the gasket on as it was supposed to go on so it wasn't water proof any more. Showered and had it under water, could see water droplets inside but still worked even with the water inside it. But it got condensation on the inside of the glass easily so a bought a new watch of the same watch again 👍

[@macbook802]

It’s still false advertising

[@jarekpszuk6944]

@@macbook802 imagine the product being more durable than the manufacturer claims or customer expects and calling it false advertisement lol.

[@macbook802]

@@jarekpszuk6944 lawsuit

[@superfast30]

Even the most basic G-Shock models are overbuilt. Great test!

[@PlasmaMongoose]

Makes sense as that feature is its main selling point.

[@Sashimi404]

7900 are not even iso rated. Imagine testing a frogman, a certified iso divers

[@garbagetalkerbeast4311]

@@Sashimi404 I have a G7900 1 and DW9052.Both are great watch for daily

[@betulaobscura]

Not "overbuilt" but properly built.

[@StevanOutdoor]

This is why I wear a Casio G-shock digital watch in my job as bushcraft, outdoor, survival instructor. Not just because the promised depth is no problem (I never go that deep) but also the shock proof. When I jump of a cliff and the watch hits the water it will withstand this sudden impact. Great testing on the watches.

[@meadandmilk]

Thanks Bear.

[@LucieOvalx]

@@meadandmilk 😂

[@PepeDeezNutz]

Yeah right

[@MrWolf-ln1gi]

@ummmmmthisguy450 world record free dive is 214 metres

[@KriegerDelfin24]

I have the G-Shock and it has been trough alot. Really holds up to its name. Dont want to miss it any more

[@derogre9602]

Please test the "Vostok Amphibia" Watches! Those are russian dive watches used by russian military, still produced in the same Factory in chistopol since the 60s! Those watches are known for their genius design, they are waterproof waaay over the rated depth of 200m. Also they are pretty cheap 70-80$ !

[@juslitor]

A good idea. The diver watch crowd would go nuts if you tested the most popular sub 500€ watches at the market.

[@Beyondthepress]

We have those coming soon!

[@derogre9602]

@@Beyondthepress Awesome! this deepsea-chamber is very cool and interesting content!

[@BaddaBigBoom]

@@Beyondthepress "one month" Meranom? ;-)

[@BaddaBigBoom]

I have two ...and a Kommandirski :-) Thumbs up.

[@AleksiJoensuu]

My guess is that if you would have gone back to surface from that 500-700 meters it would have come back to life. Because you know how if you push on an LCD with your finger it will go blank. So I think the glass pressed on the screen and made it go weird, but it might have been okay if you came back.

[@rause8622]

I wear a g-shock everyday, this was really cool to watch I’m glad that it does what it says!

[@hippycow1006]

I wore mine to camp raven knob maybe 5 years ago. I swam with it, must’ve hit it on something because when I came out, it had water in it. It slowly started dying from there. Kinda sad

[@entertainme7523]

@@hippycow1006 what model

[@hippycow1006]

@@entertainme7523 I’m not sure, it was sitting in a drawer and I decided to use it. Probably 2001 or something like that

[@hippycow1006]

@@entertainme7523 nevermind, 1990’s and mine was destroyed in 2016

[@MartinLuetzelberger]

G-Shock fans have been waiting for this for a long time! 👍

[@levisalvini4110]

Yep...

[@bubbajenkins123]

They found the G-spot. It was at the bottom of the ocean, bros. Take note.

[@upsidedown4155]

It takes deep investigation, but like treasure, euphoric once found lol

[@ACETONEWALL]

Knowing where it is has made it even more out of reach

[@RTB71289]

When you find it, you're gonna get wet.

[@ironpirate8]

It may as well be..

[@dcale15]

When it becomes an ocean is when you know you have found it

[@joewas2225]

As a G-Shock fan this puts a smile on my face. Hands down the best advertisement for one. Not only meets what they claim but far exceeds them.

[@stevecollins2770]

SUGGESTION: Block the light coming from behind the watch and put several LEDs to shine on the watch face from outside the chamber.

[@StygianBlood]

Probably the best advertisement these watches have or ever will get lol

[@TheAverageTargaryen]

Naw bro they’re big in the watch community everyone’s got a G shock for outdoor or everyday life even high rollers with Pateks, A Lange Söhne, Etc

[@donniev8181]

Best or worst depending on the results.

[@KarunaMurti]

Nah they already have better advertisements since the beginning (used as hockey game puck) and torture tests for more than 35 years already.

[@donniev8181]

@@KarunaMurti yeah cause you always get hit by hockey pucks at 200 meters deep while swimming

[@babalonkie]

@@donniev8181 They are the most reliable and robust affordable watches in existence and have been for decades... they are also more well known than Rolex... They earned their name decades ago and kept it. This test literately has ZERO practical use... as the watch can withstand more pressure than any human, even in a reinforced diving suit... So unless you drop the watch in the Mariana trench and plan to magically defy physics and get it... this video is just for fun (unless it breaks at human diver depths... which i don't need to see the video to know it will survive). They can survive hammer hits, being run over, repeatedly smashed on a brick wall... and this is just my personnel experience.

[@BarnOwl61]

I am very, very impressed with the quality of this relatively affordable diver. Happy to be the owner of a few models. I always expected it to perform a lot better than 20 bar, but this was incredible! I think my swimming in the pool won't be a problem! Compliments to Casio watches!

[@parabyssg]

Before this video, I was sometimes afraid to swim with my CasioOak, but now absolutely not

[@e28forever30]

@@parabyssg Every G can stand up to serious abuse.

[@Henchman_Holding_Wrench]

Me washing that watch everyday after my shift ends: "Is this really safe?"

[@entertainme7523]

Soap will harm the seals

[@tinton08568]

don't wash it with soap or chemicals

[@jacobcurry922]

Wel shucks I give mine a good ole wash every now and then

[@KennyVo120]

Just warm water is fine, don't use detergents soaps etc

[@ibanezleftyclub]

If you were a kid in the mid to late 80’s and the 90’s, you weren’t cool until you had one of these.

[@LordTechPro]

Even now

[@elsamu95]

Even now, also if the g shocks were Swiss they would cost thousands of dollars.

[@askylibrarianoftheoceans4102]

I took an alternate route - I had a Mickey Mouse watch. I was cool because I could tell time on an analogue watch... which is really sad, tbh

[@desertsoldier41]

@@elsamu95 Victorionox makes a Shock proof watch that costs $250 its called the INOX....so no. Marathon has a G-shock alternative for $100.

[@voltgaming2213]

samu nah Japanese watches also cost high because of “made in Japan “ prestige but Casio keeps low by manufacturing out side btw Japan made g shock are better only slightly

[@InNominePraxis]

I was screaming "PRESS THE BUTTONS" after you took it out. Does it still make the beeping sounds, is the EL backlight still working?

[@AndrewZonenberg]

I also wanted to see them open it up and see if the electronics were soaked or if the inside stayed dry.

[@appalachiangunman9589]

@@AndrewZonenberg same here. I’d like to know at what point it would actually leak.

[@snowywelsh]

Me too

[@evilarchconservative2952]

Love ❤ my G-Shocks....this proves they are tougher than advertised.

[@rolex517]

You would try an Oil filled watch, something like a Sinn Hydro, they are rated to 11,000 feet.

[@khalidnajjar]

or a casio duro and do an oil fill mod the rating on that is still un known

[@smallthings6590]

I'd like to see a oil filled gshock to see how much better it gets.

[@AlfredoCronistaViajes]

I agree. In some other video even someone offered to send her a hydrolyzed watch for testing. A cheap CASIO could be enough. A MRW-200H o something like that.

[@thelairdmc]

Haha, I just posted requesting oil filled! Great minds think alike!

[@richardking6985]

I was just about to suggest fiilling the gshock with mineral oil ....

[@papricep6248]

I love that in ever way G Shocks are tougher than advertised and much tougher than I would ever need.

[@jrc9568]

this is a 200meter Casio watch...is very resistant...amazing test....greetings from Colombia.

[@YouTube_user3333]

I got given a G shock watch recently. I was a little concerned how much it would cost to fit a new band. After watching this, it’s totally worth putting a new band on, for my free diving. 👏 thank you

[@iftimevasile4648]

Awesome videos! It would be interesting to test some affordable watches (like Casio, Timex or Seiko), rated at 30 and 50 meters to see how they perform under greater water pressure.

[@skipinkoreaable]

Yes. Over at the Greg Anderson channel he says that he always swims with any Casio that says 50m or more and never had an issue in 30 years. It would be interesting to see.

[@commanderlake7997]

Notice all the buttons pop out when the screen breaks at full pressure.

[@Eckoolt]

They were pushed in because of pressure at first, that means watch didn't let in any water.

[@iridiumballs1645]

06:11

[@thehorologychannel]

Very impressive for the watch, that even is not a dive watch. Thank you very much for the video!

[@JamesEsau]

It seemed to really not like the speed at which you increased pressure. I'd be curious to see if it would hold up to greater pressure if you went slower (more like real scenario since you can't dive that fast)

[@USS_ESSEX_CV-9]

I would imagine if he went slow it probably would have broken closer to a kilometer in depth. That is completely a guess on my part I have no evidence whatsoever to back that up

[@timmcdonald5335]

It would be great if you can do more of these tests with dive watches.

[@WoodworkerDon]

The outcome does not SHOCK me at all. :)

[@paulelliott3220]

The deep sea chamber is a wonderful item to have Think how many thing you can slowly crush - he’s having a go and this is great Did it get the metal version of the bends from the sharp decrease in pressure ? It’s a wonderful channel

[@sevensixtwothirtynine3020]

quite possibly THE BEST watch review ever

[@BryanTorok]

Thank you for doing these tests. It is really nice to know that my watch will survive to any depth that I am likely to take it. For me that might be 10 feet.

[@98167]

thank you. I enjoyed your demonstration & humor 😅

[@certomaz]

I aways knew cheap plastic g-shock is better than metal divers, now thanks to your tests it is proved. Thank you!

[@BushCampingTools]

Still watertight to 300m but the LCD is now deforming from the pressure of the glass at 31.5 bar as one can see the letters SAT starting to disappear. Amazing!

[@spacepie9]

I'd love to see an underwater camera test where the camera is recording from inside the chamber. Maybe a cheap one from amazon, then move up to a gopro with or without a waterproof housing.

[@ewcm1878]

Go pro sucks.

[@JB-zp5fb]

So a $100 Casio can go deeper than a $6000 Rolex Submariner, sounds like great value for money.

[@adiwestborneo6652]

For money. Not style

[@L1ama]

@PCJPguy and it still keeps worse time than a $5 quartz oscillator by orders of magnitude lol

[@PaoloUttinacci]

Rolex?? What is!!

[@naio21]

@omar alrubaie this G-Shock also can, as it's solar powered. Of course the rechargeable battery won't last forever (+/- 15 years), but nor will a Rolex without servicing periodically.

[@JohnDoe-sp5jd]

@PCJPguy FYI Rolex watches are not hand assembled, and it certainly doesn’t take a year to make one. Rolex have made 1.2 million watches in 2019. All Rolex watches are robotically assembled beside the ones that have embedded diamonds.

[@unclebob540i3]

G shocks are tough! I used one as my primary dive watch for years.

[@donniev8181]

These companies are definitely watching these tests with their fingers crossed. God bless

[@rjgscotland]

Lighting was better in the last watch video. I think you need to bump up the exposure compensation (EV Comp) setting on the GoPro a bit to counteract the backlight.

[@fewwiggle]

Or, maybe (for digital watches) he needs a small reflector/mirror off to the side to throw some more front light on the watch face.

[@AlexKall]

@@fewwiggle good idea!

[@RealBelisariusCawl]

I used to sell watches for a living. G-Shocks may not be the prettiest watches out there but they are without a doubt the absolute best buy for the money. Crazy durable, crazy long-lasting, absolutely worth it if you actually need a watch that will never fail you, no questions asked. I’d take it into combat if I had to. We sold watches five times that price that were way nicer looking that I wouldn’t trust to do one tenth as much as one of these little babies.

[@LordTechPro]

G-SHOCK. Absolute Toughness.

[@edgolembe956]

An impressive test. With the current interest in oil filled "Hyro Modding" watches, it be interesting to see how that would work.

[@Wingnut_Stickman]

It is nice to see a product that lives up to its claim. BTP Rocks!

[@joeyr7294]

0:45 the way he rubbed the cylinder, looks like it makes him really happy lol.

[@Matt28NJ]

I noticed that too. Boys and their toys...

[@gshockhighfashion]

G-Shock, real toughness.

[@rapidort]

Wow Even though it's a basic model of the G-Shock, it's amazing how it works flawlessly up to 500 meters!!

[@awmperry]

That’s bloody impressive.

[@stephenbridges2791]

I have the negative display version of that very watch. Nice to see it do so well.

[@snowywelsh]

I have that one too.

[@aliffitisham129]

Let us hope that this channel will grow big one day and have the chance to test the sea dweller 🙏

[@winmachielse1233]

Impressive test. I have g-shocks since the 80’s, they’re very tough indeed.

[@itsallrobbish]

Good for you. I have my DW-5200 from 1984 that I bought new and I have a DW-5600C from 1987, brilliant watches!

[@igbowgames]

"There is one guy in the world that might break this watch" Casio G-Shock new slogan

[@attilakonkoly4329]

Who is that Guy?

[@snowywelsh]

Thanks, nice video. I own this model, amazing what it's capable of. I only wish you would open up the case back to show us any water ingress.

[@consciouslasagne354]

My friend gave me my G-shock. What a nice friend.

[@ma7978]

Have this watch for years! Best watch EVER MADE!!

[@PaoloUttinacci]

CGS, simply the best watches on earth.

[@recht181]

not finished with the vid yet, but this will make or break my decision to buy one. thank you!

[@scottsj4625]

That is impressive that it was still fine past 600 meters for a 200 meter rated Gshock, I have a few of them, I really like them and they can really take abuse.

[@dorusalman4000]

Nice work to test Casio watches..i am a fan Casio G Shock !! YOU ARE THE BEST !!

[@johnl.8616]

Casio G shocks, they take a beating.

[@DovidSal]

i have no idea of what they are saying but i really like the show for the technical part and because of the way they do the show , very simple, spontaneously .. just regular people doing a good test.. regards..

[@bensneller5797]

What happened to the giant blender project u were planning to build a few years ago?

[@Beyondthepress]

I have been way too busy :D I try to get my shit together and finish it on someday

[@zsavage1820]

If I"m not mistaken... that screen is liquid crystal ... I am still shocked G... that the Casio lived up to it's hype... thanks again for another great video...

[@derGotti1988]

You could test a "Sinn UX" rated up to 5 km depth with the watch still working. The case actually can hold the pressure of up to 12 km depth. A really impressive dive watch :)

[@azianknight]

Who's gonna dive at 12KM wearing a watch? The deepest dive a human being has gone is 332 metres. Lol

[@Jorj57]

@@azianknight a submarine 😂

[@kosongkosong5330]

Maybe you should try the "frogman" or the gw-5000 with solid stainless steel case.

[@phillipdavies1081]

Always been a big fan of Casio G-Shocks, owned a few of them over the years. Knew they were good but even I didn't realise they were this good.

[@KurzawaJakub]

Thank you for testing the G-Shock watch!

[@Rodrigo8]

The deepest dive on record is 1,082 feet (332 meters) set by Ahmed Gabr in 2014

[@Echpochmak88]

Amazing video, thanks!! Have same Casio! Can you test G-Shock Frogman?

[@brotherandrew3393]

The problem is that your pressure chamber does not tell us when the watch is no longer sealed so that water can come in. The watch can still work if it is unsealed under pressure as long as it is not flooded with water.

[@maddon001]

my friends g shock had a hard life, to give it a good send off we placed it under a bmw wheel and did a huge burn out on top of it. amazingly the inner workings survived and still showed the time.

[@maboleth]

Great test! The best I've found on the internet so far. Suggestion to maybe try compressing and decompressing in smaller steps next time? Maybe it wouldn't break that easily even at 2km? When you relieved the pressure it literally exploded inside. Again, fantastic test! I love Casio even more now. :)

[@ciaociao5993]

There are many legendary watches you could test: 1) Citizen ny0040 2) Seiko SKX007/SKX013/SKX009 3) Vostok Amphibian 4) Cressi Manta 5) Citizen Aqualand 1 JP2000 6) Casio Frogman GWF-D1000 7) Invicta Pro Diver 8926OB 8) Hamilton Khaki Navy Frogman 9) Citizen jp1010 10) Every Rolex 11) Omega Seamaster Diver 300 12) Hamilton KHAKI NAVY SCUBA 13) Swatch Scuba 14) Seiko Turtle / mini Turtle 15) Longines Hydroconquest 16) Seiko Sea Urchin SNZF17 17) Casio New Frogman GWF-A1000 18) Sector DIve 300

[@kolo95pl]

Please test two same watches one hydromod and one normal. Im very curious about result. 😀

[@jaumeballesteros4238]

Buenísimos vídeos..por favor, mete un casio f91.. Saludos

[@aaroncerverau]

Please please, try a G shock Frogman to see how a "true diver's G shock watch" performs . Please please

[@GadgetInspektor]

but they rated it 20ATM/200m too. So if it would be so much more capable why wouldn’t Casio rate it 300 or 500m?

[@aaroncerverau]

@@GadgetInspektor normally when they rate watched, they need to leave a margin, so it could be safely rated at X meters of depth resistance. For example, watch is rated 20bar, but testing might be at 25bar, so there is always a little bit more protection.

[@filippxx]

@@GadgetInspektor I Think it's related to paying for new certifications and paperwork. It's really not worth the trouble of doing that in a few hundred dollars watch as everyone already know they can take at least double from independent tests.

[@SidBonkers51]

Brilliant, cant say I'm surprised though, Casio know how to make a proper tough watch.

[@TheAstronomyDude]

Push the G!!! You should have tried to see if the backlight still turns on.

[@Beyondthepress]

I didn't know that there is such a feature :D

[@talhahabib339]

to check the capability,a 20 bar watch should be kept at 20 bar pressure for atleast 30mins to check the company claim.coz you just dont go into see and come out within 2,3 mins.you obviously stay there for some time,so watch should stay water proof for that amount of time.

[@albedo0point39]

Send it back to Casio and see if they'll replace! :P

[@assassinlexx1993]

Say you have a deep bathtub.

[@aswinipaikray809]

@@assassinlexx1993 😂😂😂

[@adsads4307]

@@assassinlexx1993 yeah, like 2km deep bathtub

[@snowywelsh]

I took mine to the bottom of voyager deep and it still survived!

[@sc1837]

Great thanks...Would like to see a Casio Duro tested or a ratio freediver. Thanks

[@WoodworkerDon]

I'm never first. I'm never last. But I'm always watching, And having a blast.

[@899panigale4]

This review and his accent is so refreshing 🍂

[@Macieyevsky]

I think that 3D printed stuff with different infill percentage might behave funny in this chamber. It would be a pretty good video theme.

[@ockelboi9948]

I had a thought. You could take a screenshot from a frame from a video showing the pressure meter up in the corner, and then print it out, put some double sided tape on the back of the bit with the pressure gauge window, then cut out a small circle and a strip from parts without numbers, and then put these on the actual pressure gauge window (or perhaps an extra transparent piece in front of it to make it more temporary) to cover the point and unit, to show the depth in meters.

[@jjohnston94]

Or just mentally move the decimal point in the number on the display one place to the right to get the depth in meters.

[@heramoti123]

NEXT TIME TEST THE G-SHOCK FROGMAN SERIES

[@Das_Teej]

Now that we’ve seen what a bone stock 7900 is capable of, I’m curious as to how much farther it can be pushed if the watch case is filled with oil.

[@김태원-d3u]

For someone who is disappointed with the G shock result. Plz, no worries. The watch is gonna survive even though the owner is likely dead by the water pressure.. If you are not a "super" professional diver or sth, The watch is gonna be totally fine

[@MartinLuetzelberger]

👍

[@chekiechekie]

I have this watch and it is one of my favourites. A little sad that you had to choose this particular model to test... i wonder if the entry level squares have the same level of protection?

[@gyulahajdu2798]

Finally a real stress test :D

[@kevinbeckett2181]

Would love to see a gshock frogman in there, they are said to go to 1000m no problem! Rated iso200m. Bit expensive though!

[@doctwiggenberry5324]

I bet even Jaques Costeau would have loved to have that watch.

[@JustRen_owo]

Omg this watch is my first ever watch i have in my life since i was 13, im now 22 and its 9 years and still works good, love mine😊😊

[@KENKENNIFF]

I got one of these because its like the one Walter wears in The Big Lebowski. He knows about pressure.

[@BigBlueGr8ness]

This is really impressive I love G-Shock watches 👍🏻👍🏻

[@1SaG]

If I ever dove to 700 meters, I wouldn't be worried about my watch. I'd be dead from the water pressure long before the watch would give up the ghost ... :D

[@Pete...NoNotThatOne]

If I ever get to seven hundred metres, my feet will be encased in a block of concrete, and I won’t give a shit what time it is

[@e28forever30]

Slechte vertaling hoor...😬

[@Jack_Krauzers]

dude I wont even go pass 100m 🤣 that's scary beneath the pitch black where water consumes you

[@Segafishy]

On top of the Vostok (which I know is coming and incidently I am wearing an example of) I'd like to see the Casio F91, its only rated to 30m but is notorious for far exceeding this so it would be intresting to see how far one will really go.

[@MusicFurler]

Would salt water be different in anyway? Just curious.

[@kanada2525]

Yes it would. Divers usually put their watches in a glass of clean water overnight after a saltwater dive to desolve the salt buily up by buttons and such, is what I was told after diving on holiday by the instructor. It was a casio g shock mtg 930du. It is pushing 9 years and I never take it off! 2 years ago id did get but foggy after a hot summer day I was after exercise, I had a swim in the local stream wixh was pretty cold. That must of done it. Next year I am planning to buy the " new" all metal g shock.

[@CakeDispenser]

@@kanada2525 I hope in the future they release a Gshock square that is solar powered and keeps track of time with GPS.

[@Sashimi404]

ρ g h. Desity times by gravity and depth. Salt and tap water have different densities. If youre diving irl, it would make a different. A dive at 200m will results different pressure reading between a salt water vs tap water.

[@chrisk1255]

4:07 You can see the cracks appear in the crystal. Fantastic! These watches are still invincible, in my opinion.

[@jaceshards]

"You can still see the time but some of the seasonings are gone." Lauri, you should be ashamed for such a dreadful pun, lmao.

[@daverobertson623]

That is actually staggeringly impressive