Lagrangian of a relativistic particle classical(12)2013 dec

[@sripriya3664]

superb classes sir...grt explanation s sir..

[@mamatabehera7678]

Thanks sir....you are able clear the fundamental thing of L & H......☺☺☺

[@sarathadevi7043]

Superb sir. Thank u

[@StayCalm-og8fo]

you could have got it by squaring the hamiltonian equation itself. sir please explain why you went into that c=1 thing. sir in addition can you please help find the resultant of two relativistic velocities?

[@ishanpandey2853]

thanks sir, explained very nicely

[@sawankumarbhakar3389]

nyc sirr g

[@mysports5661]

very nice.

[@aloziircho6484]

7;42... Yes fine👍

[@deepakjindal2045]

Nice

[@zoltankurti]

This is not relativistic.. giving the potential as a function of position is never relativistic, it must depend on 4-position.