Biggest Mistake about Democracy

[@SusanHopkinson]

I love your videos Vic. Thanks for your devotion to teaching 🙏🏻❤️

[@MichaelForde521]

You clarify political science better than political scientists.

[@cristicion3333]

Thanks!

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

thank you so much

[@ud1235]

No words to express joy and wisdom in sharing this and listening to it! Vic - u r raising your own set high bar even higher. Can we expect to see you depict vedic continent material with this political across earth to understand the architects design of the cosmos played out on earth in cycles. Hopefully soon...❤ from 🇮🇳

[@lemonysnickette]

I'm so glad I clicked on this video. I knew you would share very interesting information with us.

[@gracenote108]

The late Aindra prabhu wrote the divisions of government styles in relation to the varnas in his book and he came to the same conclusion you did.

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

the first person to start looking at it this way was Ravindra Svarupa dasa

[@Tom_Wolf_]

Thank you for your videos. They have helped me enormously.

[@tudorhulban2817]

thank you for the outstanding point of views and material

[@jenniejaffe8582]

A fascinating breakdown and analysis illustrating the how archetypes function

[@bhavyam.p680]

Thank you Vic ❤

[@yash4189]

Wow, Varnas. Impactful

[@melinavdw342]

A MA ZING video Vic! Thank you for your insight ❤

[@aprilrose2389]

BRILLIANT✨✨ Thank you for such enlightening teachings ❤

[@juleen4099]

WOW! This helps me better understand myself and others in society. 🎉

[@kavitaahuja5285]

Well said. Thank you for making the video.

[@solitude731]

Aquarius is the sign to look at when looking towards the anarchist side of the scale when asking the question on qualifications on rule, for Aquarius brings scientific inquiry and philanthropy to the equation. You can see this in the concepts of AI, remote work, linguistics, and the like.

[@hazesummer8328]

Aquarius is amoral, it doesn't distinguish between right and wrong... That's why scientific endeavours can often lead to anti-ethical places like AI using art without scrutiny for credit, the use of human brain cells for computing or even eugenics and other forms of cruel or even "evil" social engineering... Aquarius is not "good" because Saturn is unconcerned with "goodness."

[@hazesummer8328]

KZbin removed my comment, but I said aquarius is amoral and can therefore lead society to anti-ethical endeavours... Aquarius is unconcerned with good and evil because its lord, Saturn, is equally unconcerned.

[@ryeretsian]

Absolutely fascinating; an integration of all forms of government.

[@Strawberryjasmindoll]

You never disappoint

[@vinodwadile8262]

Well explained ❤

[@ghellag]

It turns out this topic was a great idea afterall. Amazing video!

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

very happy to read this!

[@ryeretsian]

From a practical standpoint, the obvious question that comes to mind is how do we even determine individuals’ archetypal disposition? Would astrology be a useful instrument? Would a psychological evaluation of one’s character and inclinations be the way to go? Ideally, people should have sufficient self-knowledge and self-acceptance to make that determination for themselves. But, this somehow seems impossible today.

[@VichalGajapersad]

This is such a great video! Thanks Vic. Hare Krishna.

[@MagikForTheMAsses]

oh my!

[@anuradham8435]

Wow ❤ you described the varna system perfectly…Respect 🙏🏼

[@TheBlackz1234]

Great video as usual

[@Leo13Aslesha]

Wow this is amazing

[@lweiruweiru]

luminous❤

[@Venussfllytrrap]

We need to rule ourselves

[@satvata]

Did USSR mean the usurpation of power by Stalin and the complete removal of the working class from government? Of course not. Here is what V.I. Lenin wrote on this occasion: ... That the dictatorship of individuals has very often been in the history of revolutionary movements the exponent, bearer, conductor of the dictatorship of the revolutionary classes, this is evidenced by the indisputable experience of history... The dictatorship of individuals was undoubtedly combined with bourgeois democracy. But on this point, the bourgeois detractors of the Soviet government, as well as their petty-bourgeois undertones, always show sleight of hand: on the one hand, they declare the Soviet government simply something ridiculous, anarchic, wild, diligently bypassing all our historical parallels and theoretical evidence that the Soviets are the highest form of democracy, even more: the beginning of socialist forms of democracy; on the other hand, they impose higher demands on us than bourgeois democracy and say: personal dictatorship is absolutely incompatible with our Bolshevik (i.e., not bourgeois, but socialist), Soviet democracy. The system of Councils from bottom to top developed and improved. All economic affairs in the USSR were handled by elected deputies of the Soviets - rural, district, city, regional, up to the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. The governments appointed by the Supreme Soviet of the USSR managed the country's domestic and foreign policy. More than 60% of the Soviets at all levels were workers and peasants, and there were more than 2.5 million permanent members of the Soviets. The rotation of deputies led to the fact that a huge part of the working population gained experience in government through the Soviets and their commissions and committees, participating in the preparation of resolutions, hosting citizens, addressing Soviet civil servants on various issues, etc. The Central Committee of the CPSU (b), and then the CPSU, party committees at all levels could not make binding decisions that were not coordinated with the Soviet authorities. But the fact is that in order to strengthen its influence on decision-making, the ruling party has made efforts to significantly increase its membership, strengthen party discipline and increase the influence of party committees. The party, in accordance with the right assigned to it in the Constitution of the USSR, was engaged in searching candidates for posts. Monopoly of Communist party was natural as it was expressing interests of majority. So noway USSR was an example of dictatorship. I was living in USSR and I am living in RF now and I know what about I am speaking. My parents were simple workers - wish them long life - but they were workers and deputies at the same time. Because they were best at their work. They didn't get payment for they being deputies. It was their service to society. But we had in USSR free flats, place for living, free medicine, free education, free additional education, free holidays and so on. Many Russian people want USSR back...

[@don-eb3fj]

Tell all that to the uncounted millions who were disenfranchised from this rosy portrait of the paragon of human dignity, by the Holodomor and forced labor camps and "9 grams" from a pistol to the head. Feudalism has worn many masks to disguise the fact that its proprietors have nothing to offer besides the understanding of how to psychologically exploit the vices and virtues of others and reduce them to chattel and cogs in the machinery that ensures the continuity of a system that allows the few to live luxuriously at the expense of the many. The form may change, MUST change, as knowledge and technology develop, bringing both threat and opportunity for further security to the empowered; but the hierarchical structure is always maintained by the masses themselves who stack the stones and dream of being the one who will sit on the next tier above those who once labored beside him. When attempts at all forms of centralized government are finally abandoned in favor of honest non-violent interaction on the basis of acknowledgement and celebration of our interdependence and differently-gifted natures, only then will we finally emerge from our dark history of Plato's Cave and see the best humanity is capable of. Until then: "...you're just, a - nother, country; and other c**t-like tendencies" , and I will uphold only the🏴of mourning, for all those who suffered and perished in the name of delusions of grandeur, and for the choices not made - It's the only way to be.

[@99koto]

Oh this was so beautiful! Love the pyramid breakdown.

[@Badtothebonez]

I agree. With democracy people do not choose anything, neither the rules, nor the rulers, this is an illusion. The closest to the ideal is monarchy, with the advisors, Jupiter and Venus, who make the laws, the natural leader, the Sun, the law-enforcement, Mars and so on. The monarch rules through lineage, which means it is in their genes and blood to be a good ruler and this would come naturally to them, instinctively and habitually. The subconscious mind rules us, and even without much advice, the Sun is capable of ruling and absolutely accountable.👍🙏

[@Venussfllytrrap]

Oh but there have been some really terrible rulers in the same bloodlines historically

[@vinayaksharma8101]

What clear understanding.

[@nicoleschilling6420]

Interesting

[@satvata]

Thank you. It's interesting. Good matter to think. Where one can find this description As you said, it is described in Vedas. But where exactly ? In Srimad Bhagavatam and in Bhagavad Gita there's no such description of varna-ashrama according to planets. So such description is in some astrological tractates...? Which works exactly ? Can you give links, please. Still, many questions are left. Sociology is quite a difficult thing. So, if you think that multileveled types of ruling is possible, then where we can find it and how to establish? Where's an example ? Modern Indian society is also multileveled but what we observe there, is really gastly - people are divided into sorts (perverted caste system). It's kind of fascism, shovinism. And the past of Indian society is also dark (slaves, untouched people, outcasts, patrirchat...)... Looks like this theory is just a nice beautiful dream.. Also I can't agree that communist rule was an example of idiocratic tyranny. It's wrong understanding, in my vision. If you study history and statistics you will find that tyranny in Soviet Union was less than in other countries. Big country which faced many difficulties and internal and external animes needed and needs strong ruler. Soviet people loved Stalin and didn't accept him as a tyran. It's a myth. Later on, Hruschev destroyed strong socialistic system and he was a dictator whom people did not like. Gorbachev and Eltsin finally destroyed the socialist society. They acted as deceivers. The USSR was not an example of a dictatorship. There is a US CIA information report on the Soviet Union after Stalin's death. It was declassified only in 2008 and published on the official website of the CIA. You can check it yourself. Analysts point out that Stalin was a collective leader, not a dictator. And his role of "sole authority" is greatly exaggerated. This is mainly due to a lack of understanding in the West of the real nature and organization of the communist power structure. It is important to verify information, because propaganda distorts reality, spreads fakes, and conducts an information war..

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

in the astrological texts like phaladīpika. in fact almost all of them.

[@satvata]

@@VicDiCaraAstrology thank so much!

[@haroldsime8389]

The government should have 5 years and replacement and one shift and we took other people like the Swiss country and 5years we change because much years bring to dictatorship and thanks to my divine mother di cara good job and you have a place on the discussion of new earth new era

[@ShaunaMarieSings]

💗💗💗

[@cristicion3333]

Thank you for explaining so beautifully why I gravitate toward anarchy. I cried when you explained it.

[@Mr0BC]

I'm wondering how Ketu would fit in, if at all.

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

ketu and rahu are anti-civilization

[@avantisiram1915]

Everyone is already self-ruled. It would be amazing if we could live just like that. :)

[@99koto]

When you say jupiterian and venusian type, do you mean an individual with jupiter and venus dominance?

[@sanatanipandit1166]

Basically Jupiter and Venus are Brahmin Planets(they are in touch with The watery Realm in which is Very sensitive to distribances so they don't allow Pollution ) If you find In ramayan the Sages who are Jupiter Venus Dominated used to Live in aryankas(Forests which weren't ruled by any King no king collected taxes there ) And Those Places were most times more prosperous than the Kingdoms As Sages had self Control Also they Adequately pushined any evil person as the beings Of water realm are very Sensitive to "vibes" So they naturally find out Which person will cause trouble They Let the people like gold sink in And Throw away the Waste Material to Shores For them to be treated well by people like them in the kingdoms

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

a person who is predominantly of the qualities of Jupiter and.or Venus. This, of course, can come from the dominance of these planets - or through dominance of their signs. ideally, both. These individuals are rare, so we have to see a LOT of CLEAR dominance of the planets/signs.

[@Badtothebonez]

@@sanatanipandit1166 but water is also the most easily polluted element. And Venus is rajas, not sattwa. The sages may have self control, but not power to rule over others. That's why they live in small areas like forests.

[@sanatanipandit1166]

@@Badtothebonez yep Venus is Rajas But Both rajas Planets - mercury and Venus when alone are Benefics Venus also becomes karak of Charity as it's directionally Strong in 12th house and exalted in Pisces that too in revati(related to abstract things ) And you are right it was Very Time consuming and energy Intensive for sages to curse every idiot coming to them And the Thing about Pollution is also true Thatswhy Rishi dronacharya never asked for Anything(Unlike what Brahmins Are supposed to do) He asked for land in return for loyalty to kuru kingdom He asked his old friend To give him Something in return for the promise he did When they were in guru kul He could have asked for Donation but he didn't Despite knowing all shastras he never performed puja for others Neither took grains From dakshina Because All these acts Transfer the Problems from donator to the receiver and even more so if receiver is a Brahmin Thatswhy I too prefer jobs In various Astrological combinations Of you see the end result is Seen that especially in nadis as The Cause of No child poverty or No marriage lack of marital hapiness being taking Donation from idiotic people Thatswhy they Only met the Kings(satvik as represented by sun ) Choose People like ram among them and gave blessings Insights and At time resources from the place they governed To take care of Lowly stubborn people and criminals people in The Hierarchycal society of cities and villages

[@99koto]

@VicDiCaraAstrology Oh, how does sign dominance work?

[@DR-po8fo]

Great and wise.

[@sanatanipandit1166]

Mars is More ruthless Then sun As sun is satvik he Will actually manage and protect While mars Is intrested in Power authoruty and commanding Sun manageing and Getting honour Sun Wants Honour for what he does (thatswhy sun represents temples Place where we Go to mange karams , seek protection and in return honour the Manager the deity) His deity is called Agni(leading one the one showing the way ) Mars wants Submission for what he does(example of his Place will be Fire place police station Expectation of Exalted mars will be Honour to the Manager of a Bad mars Bribes and Looting the citizen ) His deity is called People from mars area(South of any cultural sphere) go and take up authority in foreign lands Like Arabs of southern area Turks of southern area English from southern area Of The british islands WHILE those of Sun place (east ) Too Invade but more like By population and Their management skills They invade as they are having heat

[@tavaivasmi]

🤯🎯💯😬👏🏿🙌🏿✊🏿🙏🏿💗✨

[@MagikForTheMAsses]

jupiter in sag sounds like the obvious win !

[@RippleDrop.]

But it's rare....

[@devyanivasa7360]

Agree true

[@EshaBanerjee-bh8vi]

Feels so much like the Kabbalah tree of governance

[@EveofPyrite]

Amazing video! Are you familiar with the old testament (bible) in the holy texts it said that God wanted the priests (who knew the heavenly law that God gave moses) he wanted them to basically be the primary leaders in Israel. The priests were born into the priest hood and they knew the righteous laws so they were most likely to be good leaders . Unfortunately though the people wanted a king. When they asked for a king scripture says that God was disappointed in them and he warned them that changing how they are governed would lead to a lot of sorrow and they wouldnt be treated fairly . They kept asking and so he gave them what they wanted and they suffered for hundreds of years. Maybe it is best for the people who make the rules to be the jupiterian/venusian rulers who are wise and who understand what is rignteous and good. We Humans often don't know what is good for us though. We can be 2 busy looking at what other people have. So many people pedestalize democracy but it really is not always fair at all. I feel like I been brainwashed to think that it's the best when reality shows otherwise.

[@VicDiCaraAstrology]

I did not know that. Thank you for sharing it. I like it!

[@binaanvari1745]

:)