Binding energy graph | Nuclei | Physics | Khan Academy

[@runzit2007]

Pro Level of teaching ....wish i could have teacher like u in my school days

[@Trendygamer777]

True word

[@malharbhende4649]

pro is abbreviation of professional and you must hate your teachers to call them unprofessional

[@Yo-dq6mp]

They good teacher Difference is the need of knowledge "the thirst " We don't pay attention

[@rituchand2539]

If I ever get a chance to meet Sir Mahesh Shenoy , I would love to thank him a lot for making me fall in love with physics ❤️

[@smartiespot178]

Awesome....very well explained...👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻

[@artestic10]

Don't know why this channel has less subscriber and likes it's very good and simply understandable ❤❤❤❤ love from. Sikkim ❤❤❤

[@zeus7611]

GOAT 🐐🗿

[@rumplewang2814]

Thank you so much. You teach with such clarity that it actually makes me understand what is happening here.❤❤❤ Please keep up with the great work！

[@aceso_gg]

I am really amazed sir , the way u teach ❤ , I am impressed 😁

[@thapaharis]

I always get sth while watching your videos. They are clear. Thank you 🙏 so much for your efforts

[@whattea2680]

This is the easiest and best explained physics video I ahve ever seen,I am extremely impressed!!

[@mansisingh11b31]

It finally makes sense

[@kihustle6184]

Ahhh I am very much satisfied and impressed from your explanation sir. Thanks a lottt

[@natalialotam8087]

am I the only one obsessing over his hand writing...

[@qwertykeyboard8563]

finally, the one video that has actually explained binding energy properly. thank you.

[@madscience8302]

Sir ,I'm waiting for your video,,,,even if it was any topic ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️, super sir

[@dharmendrarathod3753]

Love your teaching sir 👌❤

[@lakshmanasevagapperumalbal9037]

Thankyou so much

[@Raven_hustles]

So blessed to have a great teacher like you! Gosh! You make it look soo easy ✨ can't thank you enough 🤌🏻🫶🏻

[@ukiy01]

Also thank you sir, this helped alot

[@prishatembhurne224]

Where are the previous videos of this chapter?

[@emilyzheng7559]

starts to love Indian accent now;). Thanks for helping me with physics. it is brilliant

[@Amnkb1]

Love the teaching style ....✨

[@kumarsujal4969]

Can't get better explanation than this >>>>

[@glowpark2665]

Damnnn great explanation

[@zraarali4323]

It was excllnt to other level.....but i wanna ask that other than making graph what kind of ques can be put up from this curve??

[@AsmShadullah]

Next level lecture. ❤

[@nagarathnamd2109]

Nice teaching .....our lectures won't tell all of this reasons tq

[@tiredcat6653]

You are literally amazing. I cannot thank you enough ❤️

[@heroicxgaming3890]

A very great way of teaching 👍 loved your video ❤️

[@evavarbanova5928]

Thank you sir! This video has helped me a lot!

[@pranavkrizz1553]

Why is the irregularities in the 0-50 Mass number range not discussed

[@ganeshrathod4643]

Thanks a lot sir for this amazing video ❤🎉

[@shivambakhtiarpuri]

hi mahesh you are the best teacher in the world

[@muhammadibrahim412]

totally brilliant..

[@itsnemo6778]

So good!

[@thejumathi2214]

Perfect

[@benmenanaazdine2782]

Thank you very much fot the excellnt lecture

[@PrabhaPanthi]

Wow thank you so much sir No words for you💖

[@Aditi-t1j]

Thank u soooo much.... Sir crystal clear

[@professorafzal9611]

Wish teachers could teach in the same way

[@NE2025ET]

Wowwwwww👏🏽🫶🏼the best explanation thank u so muchhhh sir😌😍continueeeeb this great thing🥰

[@moderncybergamer3076]

Wow what a fantastic session, it was the one of the lovable one thanks sir

[@atifyusuf5267]

THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR!

[@ibtihajmujahid8206]

Sir, we would love to hve more lessons o B.E.

[@nateriver2132]

Really great explaining, thank you

[@gungoyal6684]

Amazing explanation!

[@adventurevloggeradnanahmedusa]

His passion speaks volumes.

[@Adi-Xplains]

Awsome, Just awesome

[@Olga-gs5lc]

He has a very nice voice sounds like a happy person

[@willk9847]

thanks Mahesh, brilliant vid. could it be the surface term at play contributing to the drop off?

[@SharieFernandez]

THANKYOU. SO MUCH.

[@Clarityquest-h8l]

Best explaintion ❤😊

[@ahadabbas9567]

Thank you

[@norawallberg1345]

Thank you!

[@SivaKumar-hk7qy]

Can u pls upload videos on nuclear fission and fusion

[@annemarydavid8620]

Thank you 💗

[@喵喵咕咕咩咩呱呱啾啾]

thx a lotttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!😚

[@Shr3st]

according to some book Ni is said to be stable with 8.795 MeV and Fe 56 is following with 8.792 MeV

[@Hiran_kalana]

Yeah, i was also confused a bit

[@Sandesh-b5z]

❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@unsaali4201]

Masha ALLAH ...brilliant lecture

[@rohitmishra8969]

bhai fhat maat jana🤣

[@unsaali4201]

@@rohitmishra8969 what do u mean?

[@r.shanmugasundaram7270]

Fantastic sir.

[@AdityaMaurya-i5g1v]

Wwaahhh... Kya padhaya hai hai. Wwahahhhahahahah...,❣️

[@summiyadav5104]

The heavier elements do not undergo fusion because they are already unstable comparatively, and with further increase in mass number their stability will decrease due to fusion.

[@superrukhshan12345]

We say that heavier elements are the most unstable. But if we look at the graph, the heaviest elements have more binding energy than the lighter elements. So if they have more binding energy how can they be less stable than the lighter elements?

[@bangerxshane]

Increasing binding energy, but decreasing binding energy per nucleon.

[@shashankchandra1068]

Can u explain what is quantum chromodynamic binding energy plz?

[@anilsurjewala3606]

Always awesome

[@naikpuspalata5110]

I like u sir, ur voice 😘

[@蔡政廷-f9z]

Both of fission and fusion reaction do same thing to release energy according to the binding energy graph. The same thing is to reduce average mass (increase average binding energy). Therefore, the mass defect can use ΔE=Δm*c^2 to calculate the energy is released from the atom! 💥

[@courage936]

great video, though I just want to comment that when you say "we can't have fission for lighter elements", it is a bit misleading because you CAN have fission for lighter elements, though they will suck in more energy than they will generate, it is like a non-spontaneous reaction in chemistry.

[@nassnation1899]

I think he meant in nature... Which means that for lighter elements to undergo nuclear fission, human interference is a must. (I am not completely sure if this info tho)

[@Sneha.M.Pillai]

I guess he said that in order to understand the concept in less complex way

[@ShiviGurjar-001]

Actually these both mean same if you think clearly

[@Caravanseraii]

Sir I am Pakistani but I must say that I watch the Indian teachers on youtube because they explain the best.Huge respect and hats off to u guys love from pakistan ♥

[@MrRAYUU]

Can you please put entire chapter in one video ?

[@knowledgevision6030]

Well

[@Michael-de3ty]

What affects binding energy

[@finebug]

Sir please make videos in hindi of class 10th

[@Zolnyx]

What is that green point?

[@vershitayadav7753]

which software do you use? it is just amazing i think it is not mega electron volt but million electron volt, please check i am confuse

[@ekhlaqmalik1881]

Mega is a prefix for 10 to the power 6 (ie, 10^6) ... And also 10^6 is a million... So they are both the same.

[@fathimanasla1722]

Is there more classes from the chapter nuclei???

[@maheuuuuu]

physics but phonk

[@nandinidevi3668]

First like and view 👇👇

[@vareeshaakhtar]

👌

[@ukiy01]

Chatur from 3 idiots, is that you?

[@aswinichalamalapalli2588]

1k like

[@aryangod2003]

Why is Binding energy depicted as a positive value. According to the convention I have learned Binding energy is only positive for Unstable Nucleus like Cobalt 60 etc, otherwise it is always negative for stable atoms and isotopes. Nature tends to seek thte lowest energy state. It makes it somewhat confusing. If you consider it negative, it means if two lighter nucleuses fuse, binding energy becomes More negative (thus more stable). More negative binding energy can mean overall lower total (including mass) energy (thus more stable) than its constituents..the missing mass converted to energy E=Mc^2. Basically it is more helpful to think of binding energy as negative and trending down rather than up, at least for me.

[@aryangod2003]

I think it may be a difference in conventions but for my use cases, it is more helpful to think of binding energy as negative for stable atoms...

[@artmusic8437]

[@SumatibalaLaishram]

Great explanation 👍

[@peMpa_2006]

❤❤❤

[@MadiKhan-y7m]

❤❤❤❤