Hello Tank Nuts! Let us know what you thought of our latest video.
@pyeitme50811 ай бұрын
Wish for future videos about Chinese tanks.
@granola66111 ай бұрын
Needs more non-british perspectives
@letmeeatcake783611 ай бұрын
The amount of film that exists is incredible. Seeing these vehicles on the move is extremely informative.
@latch978111 ай бұрын
Given you released it the day after I was told to prepare a presentation on this topic, rather handy
@Ob1sdarkside11 ай бұрын
Excellent. It's great seeing everything brought together like this, the old footage is the icing on the cake
@davidpope394311 ай бұрын
My paternal grandfather started off in the cavalry and ended up in the Tank Corps in WW1. Unfortunately his military records were lost in the Blitz in WW2 but I do know he was in a Mark IV ~ probably a Female version ~ when his tank was destroyed by a German field gun, possibly 7.7cm. The warhead detonated in the engine and he was covered in burning engine oil and fuel. He later named his house Morlancourt and I’m not sure if it was because there was a tankodrome there that he might have been based at or whether he was in an action nearby there. He passed away in 1967 and although I was only 7 then I can remember the burn scars. I always regret that he didn’t live longer so I could really talk to him about his experiences. Those early tankers were real trailblazers, working in pretty horrendous conditions. I have the greatest respect for them all.
@brittakriep293811 ай бұрын
I am german. When my mother, born 1942 was a Teenage girl, a neighbor of my grandfathers house was a Veteran of WW 1. The old man still had an , Imperial moustache' and was proud, that was a Dragoner ( No Translation necessary). For the reason, that Dragoner once ago had been mounted infantry, german Dragoner in 1914 also used a spiked helmet, in contrast to other Cavallry branches. When the old man was drunken, He stood in Front of His House, wearing His old helmet and sung old soldiers songs. One day the old man , who was proud of once being a Dragoner, told this to a rather young man, who Had No knowledge about Cavallry Had never heared the word Dragoner and misheared it. He asked the old man: I don't know, what Davoner are? Did you run away? Davonrennen - to run away.
@thetankmuseum10 ай бұрын
Hi David, our research team supplied this information; Morlancourt was captured on the 9th August 1918 during the Battle of Amiens. 10th Battalion fought in that sector of the battle. They were using Mark Vs, but only received them about 3 weeks earlier, so he's likely to have had experience on Mark IVs too. Too many tanks lost to narrow it down further. There could be a link between the house name and a place where tanks fought.
@davidpope394310 ай бұрын
@@thetankmuseum Thanks for that. I know there were several actions around Morlancourt during 1918 and your mention of 10th Battalion is most helpful. I’m sure I’ve seen mention of a tankodrome/assembly area nearby in one of my older reference books. And there are a few smaller WW1 cemeteries in the area. Maybe he lost one or more close companions there. Perhaps it’s time to drag out my grandfather’s 19 volume ‘Times Illustrated History of The War’ and start ploughing through the later volumes again!
@OscarOSullivan10 ай бұрын
Tanks are part of the calvary
@Novous11 ай бұрын
Can we just appreciate for a moment how KZbin channels are giving us 1000x the quality of content that History Channel ever did?
@jacobq.220411 ай бұрын
Best I can offer is some reruns of PawnStars - Rick
@DrLoverLover11 ай бұрын
what an original comment
@SolarWebsite11 ай бұрын
Maybe not, but it's absolutely true. Of course, there also many YT channels that produce absolute crap as well....
@alexanderfox-robinson491010 ай бұрын
Come on guys, that's not a very positive attitude. Yes I agree, KZbin is amazingly useful and entertaining.
@MrVictoria6910 ай бұрын
How about that chasing treasure UBoats show? 🙃
@ITFNBiteBayKon11 ай бұрын
Great video again. I've been in Guy Martin's Mk IV. My old man took me out for the day, and where it was being kept in Norfolk was just up the road from where he lives. It was an insane piece of machinery.
@oshosanyagodwin991Ай бұрын
Battlefield 1 was definitely a great introduction to this video
@Musketeer00911 ай бұрын
Another interesting and high quality video. Thanks.
@cmotdibbler445411 ай бұрын
"It is very unstable and prone to fall over on rough ground, which is, to my way of thinking, not an ideal tank characteristic" I nearly choked on my cup of tea!
@joseelempecinao8911 ай бұрын
Excuse my ignorance but is that an example of British understatement?
@williamzk908311 ай бұрын
The A7V was a successful tank. As the Curator of the Tank Museum Munster points out, over 95% of the western front was not rough ground and quite passable to the A7V. The tracks of the A7V came from a Tractor and had to be designed this way to ensure the vehicle got into service as quickly as possible. There were other tank designs ready for production as the war ended but the Germans had essentially decided not to to produce them due to iron shortages forcing them to choose between artillery and tank. Besides they had over 400 captured British tanks.
@mikewinston870910 ай бұрын
@@joseelempecinao89..totally so….🇬🇧…😂
@Green-Mountainboy11 ай бұрын
Outstanding video! Even my roommate who has zero interest in this type of content watched and really liked it.
@petestorz17211 ай бұрын
That the FT was very forward-looking is shown by it seeing some service in WW2, and the Japanese Type 95 light tank being an improved FT-17.
@parodyclip3611 ай бұрын
Ft only, not FT17. It was never called ft17
@strelnagaming11 ай бұрын
@@parodyclip36 try googling the term ft17 Its used pretty extensively, and is considered interchangeable with FT
@andrewstevenson1184 ай бұрын
@@parodyclip36 Tick. Very good. I just made a model of one and discovered that fact for myself. 🙂
@donpfoutz62511 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation! Thank you for posting such a clear presentation. I would like to see more of the experimentals especially from this era.
@chrisj284811 ай бұрын
This was excellent. Thank you Tank Museum. 👍
@thetankmuseum10 ай бұрын
🙌
@philo685011 ай бұрын
Splendid to see this more in depth coverage of the Great War armored vehicles and the genesis of tank warfare. Looking forward to visiting the American Heritage Museum Trench Warfare Exhibit, along with the restored M1917, our first mass produced tank based on the Renault FT. Another outstanding video production, kudos to Tank Museum staff, keep 'em coming and thanks very much!
@fatherglyn11 ай бұрын
excellent video. Really interesting looking at the contrasting developments and well presented. Thank you.
@andrewclayton418111 ай бұрын
That was good. You covered all the salient points. These early tanks are quite fascinating. A bit like early naval ironclads, they didn't know how they were going to develop,, an they were feeling their way. In a longer video you could have mentioned some of the funnies they came up with. Troop and stores carriers, radio tanks, gun carriers. Good video though.
@brittakriep293811 ай бұрын
In 1866 strangely the smaller austrian fleet with mostly wooden ships won at Lissa against larger more modern italian fleet.
@MrVictoria6910 ай бұрын
They actually developed pretty quick moving the engine compartment to the back unlike the first versions up front with the crew. Must have been nasty
@Trebor7411 ай бұрын
The park in waltham cross, England has a replica wwi tank in it. It's a replacement for an original wwi tank that was placed there after wwi to thank the town for raising funds for one. It was scrapped in wwii for the metal.
@gilwhitley68104 сағат бұрын
Fantastically full of great info and incredible footage... seeing him stand there next to the ones in the museum was somehow cathartic (for me, anyway), and gave the tanks more "life" than simply seeing pictures or CGI/AI-generated footage ever could. Many thanks!
@darrenjosephgregory11 ай бұрын
I'm guessing there is still no heating in The Great War exhibition as Chris has donned a warm coat! As usual another great video, looking forward to Tankfest 2024.
@jmc703411 ай бұрын
Great vid. Would love to see the inter war years as well as WW2 in this format
@olivierguely787111 ай бұрын
Very interesting video. The spanish civil war made both germans and soviets understand how to operate tank units and the need to upsize them ( firepower, protection and mobility). The germans tested also combined operations (artillery + airplanes + tanks + infantry)
@brittakriep293811 ай бұрын
Was only , Kampf der verbundenen Waffen' extended with planes and tanks.
@RaspberryWhy11 ай бұрын
This is a very impressive video. Well done The Tank Museum
@thetankmuseum10 ай бұрын
🙌Thanks for the feedback!
@stevesmodelbuilds547311 ай бұрын
One thing missing here is the role of Winston Churchill in the development of the tank. Initially, the idea was rejected by the army, but Mr. Churchill provided financing for a 'land ship' through the Admiralty.
@davidhollenshead489210 ай бұрын
Keep in mind that Churchill was known for overstating his contributions. I read one account where he appeared to claim he was responsible for the invention of the tank...
@stevesmodelbuilds547310 ай бұрын
@@davidhollenshead4892 He was First Lord of the Admiralty and paid for initial development of the concept for Britain. He may not have 'invented' them, but after the concept was developed, the army adopted them.
@MrVictoria6910 ай бұрын
David Fletcher said one of the Mark's they had ideas to use it as a mobile MASH unit or something like that. Sounded really interesting idea
@AsbestosMuffins11 ай бұрын
it is always interesting that there was the tank made for ww1, the tanks that won ww2, and then everything thats come after
@johnlant173010 ай бұрын
Great production as usual. Copson again in good form!
@SuzieSherlock11 ай бұрын
Now THIS is epic!!!!!!
@c.j.zographos371311 ай бұрын
Fascinating to see the World War 1 origins of a weapon that we now take for granted. Excellent presentation, as we've come to expect from the Tank Museum!
@thetankmuseum10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! 🙌
@PolishMechanik11 ай бұрын
Poland also used around 17 FTs during WW2 when Germans entered Warsaw to block tunnel leading to central square
@ollyhardy701510 ай бұрын
Great stuff, thanks to all who produced this
@riverbluevert781410 ай бұрын
This video from The Tank Museum, as always, excellent!
@edpowell5754Ай бұрын
Oh I surely appreciated watching this as it's part of history, THANK YOU.
@Tailssonic1999x11 ай бұрын
I never knew they were planning to fit a rotating turret on Little Willie. I wonder why they didn't do it to the Mark I and up?
@Musketeer00911 ай бұрын
The centre of gravity was too high and the turreted version was prone to tipping over.
@tobiasfreitag218211 ай бұрын
This is just an assumption, but I guess that, since the tanks were supposed to shoot down into the trenches while crossing them, a turret on top, that would not have had enough depression to do so, would have been seen as unnecessary weight and complication.
@ciaranarmstrong28113 ай бұрын
Another thing to break, longer and more expensive production. Not that much more effective in combat given they only carried machine guns
@weetyskemian4411 ай бұрын
Very amused that a tank crew called their tank frey bentos. Cos its a tin can full of meat right? War humour.
@thhseeking10 ай бұрын
"Steak and Kidney" :P
@timothyhayes9724Ай бұрын
Oh my god! Seeing the St Chamond running made me realize how relatively small and low slung it was. I always thought it was a huge lumbering behemoth but its really quite short and compact!
@DeaconBlu11 ай бұрын
Fantastic video! Thanks!
@jeremygreenwood102111 ай бұрын
I find land leviathans incredibly romantic. Thank you for your scholarship.
@williwonti11 ай бұрын
This is me telling the math robot that I liked this content
@theemporersnewclothes11 ай бұрын
Many tanks for the informative content
@ianbell561111 ай бұрын
Great video. Loved hearing the history. Any chance of a video about inter war development Cheers
@darrensmith699911 ай бұрын
Always a treat to watch your videos (:
@BlueNukezАй бұрын
i cant imagine how terrifying it would've been to see a tank for the first time, having no clue how to attack it
@Wolfie38710 ай бұрын
A superb insight, great overview of the iron clad horse.
@LeeBrasher11 ай бұрын
Good video on an interesting topic.
@randyhavard608411 ай бұрын
Over 50,000 casualties in one day.... The generals or whoever was in charge must have really thought that the Germans would run out of bullets eventually since they just kept sending men in after the first 8 or 10,000 wounded. Insane!
@tomhenry89710 ай бұрын
And continued for months
@thhseeking10 ай бұрын
"Blackadder Goes Forth" parodies some of the insane thinking. The ending is...emotional.
@MrDandare216 ай бұрын
You have to remember that this type of warfare was fairly new. Less than one hundred years before the start of the First World War. Armies would face each other at close quarters and shoot at each other until one gave way. Tanks were designed to deal with barbed wire and machine guns. With the first limited use during the Somme battle. Had they had more reliable tanks available, then the outcome may have been different. Fast forward 18 months and you have tanks, planes and infantry working together with the artillery, causing massive losses to the German Army. The black day as their lead general called it. Progress takes time, effort and sometimes failures to succeed.
@randyhavard60846 ай бұрын
@@MrDandare21 That's exactly why I type that comment. They must have literally thought the Germans would eventually run out of bullets before they run out of men
@stco24269 ай бұрын
Many thanks for this great quality content
@flippensweet3Ай бұрын
Very good video thank you!
@martinhill703811 ай бұрын
Chris heart gold 💛 ❤
@Imp-mq1be11 ай бұрын
I love the tank museums videos
@thetankmuseum10 ай бұрын
🙌
@MJG72a11 ай бұрын
Great stuff! Thank you.
@grahampalmer933710 ай бұрын
Thank you. Very informative. My brother, now, lives close to Bovington & although I've not been since toddler/childhood I will visit again (along with RNAS Yeovilton & Haynes Sparkford) ASAP.
@IsdanoobАй бұрын
I live about 30mins train ride from the A7V in australia and i must say it is an amazing thing that our boys captured it.
@sailordude209410 ай бұрын
Very interesting military weapon history, thanks! @16:20, I never heard of a Chinse Labor Corps before, interesting!
@alancranford339810 ай бұрын
I look at the first British and French tanks as if they were the modern siege towers. siege towers in medieval times had mobility (WHEELS) and protection (arrow-protection) and firepower (archers) and could deliver an infantry team to the top of the castle walls. That forced the defenders to dig more ditches to stop those siege towers. In medieval times wider ditches meant using engineers (sappers, pioneers, miners, and cannon) to create pathways for infantry, cavalry and siege towers. The Whippet and the Reneau were actually second-generation tanks.
@darrenharvey608411 ай бұрын
I've been inside the A7V at the Queensland museum in Brisbane .
@brittakriep293811 ай бұрын
Leopard 2 A7V is currently used:-))
@imransharif4439 күн бұрын
Great information good old history
@terminusaquo198027 күн бұрын
My favourite is the Mk IX because it's the first example of the APC and protecting troops and supplies on the battlefield.
@Alan.livingston11 ай бұрын
The FT was a little beast.
10 ай бұрын
Very nice Video. Thank you
@pyeitme50811 ай бұрын
Tank goodness!
@shadowtrooper26211 ай бұрын
I was also aware that Japan also saw the effective use of tanks as a way to provide cover and support for their infantry, starting with the I-Go tank.
@theromanorder11 ай бұрын
Please do more evaluation of tank doctrine videos
@maotisjan3 ай бұрын
I enjoy videos like this very much, Tanks, like firearms, are meant to kill and destroy and so I don't think I have to tell anyone that those are bad things, but they are fascinating, again like firearms, from engineering perspective
@earlyriser899811 ай бұрын
Good summary
@simongee892811 ай бұрын
As the French & British were first in the field of tank design in a totally new industrialised war, they had nothing to guide them. Thus what they did produce was pretty good considering the circumstances.
@vesawuoristo4162Ай бұрын
Marvelous show
@SteamCrane10 ай бұрын
Very well done.
@The_Modeling_Underdog10 ай бұрын
Came here for the great video. Stayed for the looney farm comments. Wasn't disappointed in both cases. For those interested in the French side of WWI armoured warfare, there is a little book published in 1931 and tittled "Ceux des chars d'assault" (Roughly translated into "Those of the assault vehicles"). A pretty grim read on the combat conditions faced by the crews - as bad as the British had it -, though it's pretty much on an "unobtanium" level at this point. Only seen two other copies and that was ten years ago while doing a google search. Cheers.
@richardwaring861310 ай бұрын
Lincoln still commemorates Tritton by the naming of one of the major roads in the lower part of Lincoln, Tritton Way. There is a MK4? tucked away in the Museum of Lincolnshire Life on top of the Cliff on the approach to the Cathedral.
@johnsimpson8893Ай бұрын
Lucky for you Haig decided on more tanks. You would not have a museum otherwise.
@franksposato607211 ай бұрын
When the Germans capture British tanks, did any of those ever see tank combat against them elsewhere in the war? Was there ONLY the one tank battle?
@heidiwilks531611 ай бұрын
I absolutely love WWI tanks - they have such a steampunk look to them :)
@ChopperMeir10 ай бұрын
Surely it's the other way around?.
@andrewallason453010 ай бұрын
In an alternate WW1 timeline, the French developed a Renault FT Grosse. Longer and wider overall, with a larger turret ring and turret. The two man turret, with a 37 mm Infantry Gun Model 1917 main gun, and an inverted Lewis gun mounted in a commander’s cupola (the magazine disc would effectively be above the commander’s head). Capable of great speed (for the time), accurate and deadly fire against troops, emplacements and vehicles.
@rustyrelicsfarm2406Ай бұрын
My Oldest Great Grandpa served in World War One. Henry Otto Grill Private First Class United States Army 1895-1979.
@ThePsiclone11 ай бұрын
I think their tanks rolling over on rough ground was an excellent characteristic for German tanks. Not from the German point of view obviously...but I'm sure the British soldiers loved it.
@HearGear5 ай бұрын
at 1:58 That is a headshot right there.
@whya2ndaccount11 ай бұрын
0:10: Not just "Europeans". How about Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians, even the US who arrived just in time for "last drinks" lost a sizeable chunk of that generation. Also in what about the Austro-Hungarian Motorgeschütz designed by Günther Burstyn but admitted not built.
@gareththompson270811 ай бұрын
To hear Nicholas Moran tell it (and I don't doubt your expertise, but I think he also has some idea of what he's talking about) the Germans most certainly were not the only ones to appreciate the potential importance of the tank. The Germans certainly went through the least troubled interwar armor doctrine development of any of the powers that would play a part in WW2. And, unlike the British and the French, they incorporated tanks into a maneuver warfare doctrine (though the British did experiment with the idea of using mechanized maneuver forces). But the British, French, and Soviets all clearly understood that tanks were going to be very important in the next war.
@lllordllloyd10 ай бұрын
I think you misunderstand Chris: hecmeans the Germans best understood the way in which to use them... 'their importance on the battlefield'. Everyone knew it was important to have them.
@billballbuster718611 ай бұрын
LOL the Germans only built very unimpressive 20 x A7V tanks in WWI, they were largely equipped by captured British and French designs. Apart from the little Renault Ft-17, British designs dominated with the Lozenge Tanks MkI - MkV having the superior mobility and the Whippet the speed and endurance.
@BigAlsLittleKingdomАй бұрын
My city is the birthplace of the tank. Quite an accolade for such a small city.
@papaaaaaaa262511 ай бұрын
Awesome video, as always. Thank you! O think it is interesting that tanks were invented as a breakthrough weapon against the stalemate of the western front...than became a mobil element in WW2 to bring fast n quick havoc to overrun the enemy. From a vehicle designed to support infantry to a vehicle infantry is designated to support it.
@rexgeorg732410 ай бұрын
top upload guys
@peterjanvanbijnen22611 ай бұрын
please more videos 1 in every 2 weeks is not enough
@seanlander932111 ай бұрын
Eventually the Australians developed combined arms tactics to include tanks and that changed the war to breakthrough the Hindenburg Line.
@sloths-df3gf8 ай бұрын
That wonderful guy Monash put it best: ‘A perfected modern battle plan is like nothing so much as a score for an orchestral composition, where the various arms and units are the instruments, and the tasks they perform are their respective musical phrases.'
@nigellacey559Ай бұрын
In these films there's always officers with swagger sticks just pointlessly watching.
@rickblackwell643510 ай бұрын
It seems the British were able to scale up manufacturing very quickly. Any insight on how they did this?
@grahamepigney856510 ай бұрын
One of the earliest problems, and one that dogs the Russians currently, was the lack of understanding of the necessity for combined warfare. The co-ordination of tanks and infantry was difficult because there was no lightweight radio communications. Officers often guided their tanks from the outside. At Bullecourt attacks were launched according to the clock, thus infantry launched without tank support & vice-versa. My wife's grandfather (Ernest William Hayward DCM, MM) fought at Bullecourt and was invalided back to the UK after that battle.
@johanmetreus126810 ай бұрын
Everyone knows the importance of combined arms, it is the ability to achieve it that is the problem.
@AdamantLightLPАй бұрын
The Russians didn’t really expect the invasion to turn into a full on war. That was the problem.
@Cheka__3 ай бұрын
I want to see some Napoleonic Wars tanks.
@ROBERTNABORNEY5 ай бұрын
An A7V crewman was Sergeant Josip "Sepp" Dietrich. After the war, he joined the National Socialists and because of his experience with motor vehicles, in the army became Hitler's driver. He was an early recruit to the SS and became a very popular general in the next war.
@billevans793611 ай бұрын
Awesome...
@jameskelly778211 ай бұрын
Gentlemen, you have never produced a poor content video.
@timf691611 ай бұрын
Nice
@Gubbins_McBumbersnoot9 ай бұрын
Why would I join the patreon if I can’t? Wouldn’t it make more sense for me to join if I CAN?
@taiwansouthkoreajapan11 ай бұрын
this museum will probably never see a real a7v inside it's doors but at least you guys have a convincing replica/
@foreverpinkf.760310 ай бұрын
Schneider is pronounced Schnyder (EI in German is closer to Y in English, IE is pronounced like the I in machine), not Schnieder. Apart from that a good comparison.
@thhseeking10 ай бұрын
He even pronounced Ieper correctly, as it's in Flanders. Otherwise, I've heard some people butcher the French pronunciation as "Wipers" :(
@hesperidesbell46434 ай бұрын
Always wanted a Renault FT
@chrissouthgate455411 ай бұрын
For all the many flaws of the British Heavy Tanks, I think they still hold the record for trench crossing & obstacle climbing.
@huginstarkstrom11 ай бұрын
funny how the Burstyn prototype is absolutely forgotten...
@itsjustizumi10 ай бұрын
When i first time seeing the mark tanks I thought they can also be flipped and keep moving upside down😅
@garryferrington8112 ай бұрын
"Wulwo One." H.G. Wells had postulated tanks.
@madzen11211 ай бұрын
Stosstruppen was a tactical solution to a technological problem. And it worked even better than the tank.
@docholiday797510 ай бұрын
Which is why WWI was a great German victory . . . oh wait. It was a tactical solution to a strategic problem and a flawed one at that. The German army was strapped for manpower and created those units by stripping their regular units of their best men, which meant when those assault units took casualties it disproportionately weakened the army, doubly so since they took higher proportionate casualties, and couldn't readily replace them. This bites hard following Luddendorf's offensive in the west as, amongst a boatload of other problems, the cream part of the German army had just been wasted leaving a mediocre (and now demoralised) core. It also wasn't anything different neither. The entente powers had been doing similar things including making platoons smaller and easier to control on the ground, increasing firepower in those platoons, increased officer and NCO initiative and tactical training. The difference being was that the entente held a massive advantage in resources and could afford to invest in technological solutions like tanks or Petain's "le teu feu" doctrine that could better allow troops like these to do their job without taking the brunt of it.
@rankoorovic790411 ай бұрын
As far as innovation the French have that title they came up with the turret