Bissell Pet Hari Eraser vs Shark UltraCyclone Cordless Handheld Vacuum Comparison

[@legalgambling1]

Thank you for your honest comparison.

[@luvrofwaffles]

Thanks for making this!

[@danielmcphee2546]

Both look nice but Bissell I like how looks more compact

[@twospirits411]

Good review. I currently have the Bissel model in the review and I'm debating between getting the same Bissel Pet Hair, or Shark UltraCyclone or the Eufy H30for use in cleaning out the interior and floor of my car. I have noticed in this video and many others that that the Bissell has issues getting hair tangled up in that motorized unit while the shark one does not. But the Bissell one seems to hold more in its bin. I can't tell if the Eufy one is as good as the Shark though. Are you plannngon reviwing that one in the future?

[@alluringming]

i dont have these but the rotary head that helps a lot. one i have isnt the most powerful but is decent. thinking this year getting a better handheld for pet hair. do you recommend these two or something else for pet hair?

[@nightstringers]

The bissell filter cost as much as the machine practically. However it can hold more dirt. I will always pick Shark they make a great product

[@jbkwon]

Thanks for pointing that out

[@sandywjo5]

More accurate test would be on hair that is ground in, not just laying there after being dumped on top of the sofa.

[@MaryB_TN]

Nice comparison! Looks like Shark wins! Shark vacuums have more suction and fully-sealed HEPA filtration, which makes a huge difference; very few Bissell vacuums have this filtration. This makes me prefer Shark over any other vacuum.

[@ArchiezVidz]

This shark isn’t fully sealed hepa

[@affliction6911]

👍

[@anocri]

Bissell did better job than the Shark one, Daddy.

[@rgruenhaus]

Mata Hari? Peta Hari? LOL

[@whitegoodman7465]

Cyclone ergonomics suck, you gottta hold it at such a high angle to have the brushroll flat its annoying to hold and use.

[@flanpurin]

why won’t this video play

[@danielrowe3519]

Lies stdu