Laplace Transform: Translation Theorem in s

[@scoops2260]

you are now my favourite math tutor sir

[@Alex-gw5et]

Thanks man! You're seriously the GOAT for math videos.

[@2dvsr140]

i saw so many other video but i swear this is the best, i love all ur teaching videos

[@JayLikesLasers]

I get confused when blackpenredpen uses blue pen. Other than that, keep up the good work!

[@blackpenredpen]

lol

[@rickybrambila9646]

At 3:58 the legendary technique was shown

[@vk6297]

plz put all laplace sums in a playlist and this for all topics . thank u awesome teacher:)

[@blackpenredpen]

You want something better? Search “Laplace marathon” and “inverse Laplace marathon” on YT and you will see it.

[@andrewlin5484]

God bless this man.

[@mylesmontclair]

The cartwheel got me good lol...

[@CraVish]

1:23

[@lukeyard100]

im paying so much money to go to school and im still learning off of youtube, take my prof 2 hours to poorly try to explain what he did in 10 min

[@AdityaKKannan]

goated teacher

[@dannggg]

you are awesome. I understand this shit because of you. but yeah that cartwheel was the best part in the video. thanks again man. hopefully you do linear algebra sometimes because I'm doing that next semester lol

[@JohnLee-dp8ey]

However, there is a formula for inverse Laplace transform of product of functions F(s)&G(s), Inverse Laplace (F(s)*G(s)) = integral from 0 to t of f(t-v)*g(v)dv (i.e, convolution of f(t)&g(t)), where F(s) & G(s) are Laplace transforms of f(t) & g(t) respectively

[@danielodjo7036]

Thank you very much! subscribed:)

[@knowledge90s93]

Which of the following sequences could represent the impulse response of a stable discrete-time system? k^2 (-0.65)^k 2^k ksin(k)

[@robg5513]

Good vid. If you want more hits, get 'First Shifting Theorem' in the title (that's what some other books etc refer to it as).

[@ivonavranic470]

Thank you

[@ZeeshanJamal23143124324]

I will become you disciple someday.

[@joelhall649]

Hi Steve, do you have a video with the laplace transform differentiation theorem proof?

[@normansabin8322]

Here from chegg comment

[@blackpenredpen]

OH WOW!!!

[@blackpenredpen]

Do u have the link? I am just curious.

[@IIIIBallPythonsIIIII]

www.chegg.com/homework-help/A-First-Course-in-Differential-Equations-with-Modeling-Applications-10th-edition-chapter-7.3-problem-1E-solution-9781111827052

[@blackpenredpen]

IIIIBallPythonsIIIII thanks but I can't view it since I don't have an account. Would u mind taking a screenshot and tweet it to me or send it to my email at [e-mail]

[@normansabin8322]

blackpenredpen that's why I was confused. I sent u the screenshots. @gmail

[@areslowenstein2661]

i wonder how it is possible to do integration by parts with three functions may it can be helpfull to show why there are is no good solution to the Problem L(f(t)g(t))=?. Can you make a proove for my question

[@hardikparekh1003]

I belive convolution theorm can be a direct formula to solve this: L{f(t)g(t)} = F(s)*G(s) Conversely, L{f(t)*g(t)} = F(s)G(s) However, the later form is of more practical usage in analog and digital filter design than the former form.. ☺️

[@MichaelSilva-oi2sy]

There is not next vídeo KK KK

[@weinihao3632]

:,(

[@Leonardo_R.R]

my problem L {(1 / a) * e ^ (- bt / a) * f (t / a)} I could not solve