One of the things I really loved about 2049 is how it *feels* like *more* Blade Runner. It doesn't feel like a movie trying to recapture blade runner, it just *is* blade runner. So many decades later sequels wind up feeling like they're trying too hard to remind the audience of the original. They spend so much time recreating the original that they don't do anything interesting or new.
@user-xj7hq1pp3x8 ай бұрын
I wonder if the horse was supposed to be a unicorn, but that was a little too on THE NOSE, haha 🦄
@blakemeads92258 ай бұрын
I couldn’t agree more! I’m so thankful they got an intelligent filmmaker like Denise Villenueve to make this. It so easily could have been a cheap-ass retread.
@razorfett1478 ай бұрын
Agreed. Telling a new story within the same world. Expanding and building upon what came before. A continuation instead of a retread. Such A shame studios have so much trouble with this concept nowadays 😢😢
@CSM100MK28 ай бұрын
Yes, a continuation and contribution, not a copy!
@cvtuttle8 ай бұрын
I agree 100% - it just feels like the next part of the story. Amazing work.
@Hackspear2148 ай бұрын
That first huge clue that he wasn’t the child, the fact that in his memory he had hair where all the other boys had no hair (only girls had hair), went right over my head. I still can’t believe I missed that one.
@Theomite8 ай бұрын
I can. Hides in plain sight, best way to conceal a clue.
@johannesvalterdivizzini15233 ай бұрын
Yep. I'm generally good at these things, but I missed it totally.
@chairmanofthebored68608 ай бұрын
An absolutely beautifully shot film. Every frame is a work of art.
@Bar-Lord8 ай бұрын
This was one of the best theatrical experiences I’ve had. The Thursday sneak in IMAX was incredible, and it was better than it had any right to be. It hit just as hard as the original for me. “More human than human” kept coming up in my mind, and it’s interesting to see how relevant that is through the film when you see the humans vs replicants in this world. The score is incredible as well. It was a must own and one I go back to often. Naturally Hans Zimmer had to do it.
@Bar-Lord8 ай бұрын
@@EdninetyApparently my theater had a double bill with the original, which I never knew until a year or so ago. Had I known, I’d have gone. The original is on my grail list of library titles to experience in a theater. It was criminal how few went to see this theatrically. I’m glad it’s finding a second life on home video just like the original did.
@ShanelleRiccio8 ай бұрын
OH yeah these visuals are SO stunning I wish I caught in theaters
@darkphoenix28 ай бұрын
The tension in the theater during the final fight between K and Luv was palpable, I wish I could go back and relive that
@allengray57488 ай бұрын
@@ShanelleRiccio Ya not sure I could of handled the IMAX version. Not without a XANAX for the IMAX 😉 ☮️
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
Jóhann Jóhannsson (“Sicario”, “Arrival”) was originally slated to score “2049”, but apparently it was too experimental-sounding, so they brought in Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch - they did an excellent job. I wish we could hear Jóhannsson’s score, even if it was never completed.
@woeshaling64218 ай бұрын
My favorite movie of all time. It takes everything cyberpunk, that its predecessor spawned, and made it its own. The existentialism told from K, JOI and LUV were heartbreakingly compelling
@psterud8 ай бұрын
Same. This movie defied the general rule that sequels are worse than the originals, just like the original Blade Runner defied the general rule that the book is better than the movie.
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
“Blade Runner” was my all-time favorite movie until “2049”. Now “2049” holds the top spot and the original is in second place. Brilliant execution by Denis Villeneuve.
@PorungaSan8 ай бұрын
I got so much more out of this movie in my second watchthrough too bad the movie flopped at the box office - a lof of the audience went in blind (without caring to watch BR first) and got bored because they couldnt understand what was going on in the slow build up scenes, and another part of the audience wanted to watch BR but after seeing all the confusion about which version to watch they just gave up. just shows that movies that are made for a thinking (smart) audience cannot do well unless peppered with pretty stuff to distract the ones who just want to kill time/have fun.
@woeshaling64218 ай бұрын
@@clayjohanson BR 82 is a cultural milestone. Its futurism, existentialism, metahumanism, design were all defining cyberpunk as a subgenre. And yes, Neuromancer was the other milestone, BR set the look and mood for decades to come. BUT as a movie, it's average. Ridley Scott has a keen eye for visual design, but why he kept clinging on Deckard being a replicant defies logic.
@TennSeven8 ай бұрын
Sylvia Hoeks' performance (as Luv) in this movie was just absolutely fantastic. Her scene with Lt. Joshi gives me chills every time.
@daver18qc8 ай бұрын
And that kick! I felt it through my screen! 😵
@colbyboucher63918 ай бұрын
Seriously. Her and K are both programmed killers. K (tragically) swallows his emotions and believes that he must not have any if he "isn't" human, and he transforms them into a cerebral, spiritual purpose he gives up his life for. Luv, on the other hand, is ruled by her emotions, but has no idea how to (or is unable to) process them and goes on with her programmed purpose anyways. She takes her anger out on Joshi as a Wallace analogue, she feels a sort of righteous indignation towards what's happening to her kind, but above all she still wants to make Wallace happy. It all comes crashing together in her inability to distinguish between being attracted to K and hating him. She beats him half to death but doesn't want him dead. She's jealous. The actress has mentioned that Luv is 12 years old, and that checks out (particularly since she probably doesn't have any implanted memories) I wonder how old K is meant to be.
@The_RedVIII8 ай бұрын
Probably the best sequel ever made. I saw it 3 times in theatres because it was such an audiovisual masterpiece. So yeah, I definitely did my best to make this a hit, where was everyone else?? lol
@knightsofsumeria8 ай бұрын
I was too young
@derred7238 ай бұрын
One, I saw it in theater but it was unlikely to be a huge hit because the original was not a huge hit. It was a cult classic. That being said, i think they didn't do a great job marketing which hurt.
@o.b.72178 ай бұрын
If you're looking for "steampunk" vibes, you're in the wrong movie. XD This is cyberpunk.
@michaelseelhoff94618 ай бұрын
I loved the first movie and was scared that they will ruined it by making a awful sequel. But I was wrong. Somehow they get the magic from Blade Runner into a great film for the next generation. I love it ❤️
@johnbernhardtsen30088 ай бұрын
both had amazing directors of photography, 1982 got Jordan Cronenweth and this movie had Roger Deakins!
@Theomite8 ай бұрын
Get the right people with the right project and stay the hell out of their way and you can't miss.
@johnbernhardtsen30088 ай бұрын
like the first Matrix movie, they actually blew all of the money for the movie with the opening scene with Trinity roof top chase, the producers saw the about 8 minutes and granted the rest no questions asked!@@Theomite
@chrisleebowers8 ай бұрын
Wallace outlines how Deckard *could* be a replicant, but also explains how it ultimately doesn't matter. One wonders how Deckard could survive in irradiated Las Vegas if he was human. Is the dog a replicant? Does the presence of the bees indicate the radiation has dissipated enough for life to take hold again?
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
When K is first scanning Las Vegas with his pilotfish drone, the readout says that radiation is nominal. That means the radiation is not at a harmful level.
@pseudohacker8 ай бұрын
It’s irrelevant
@chris...94978 ай бұрын
Bumblebees exposed to levels of radiation found within the Chernobyl exclusion zone suffered a "significant" drop in reproduction; I suspect the same is true of honey bees.
@chrisleebowers8 ай бұрын
@@clayjohanson Yeah but how long has Deckard been hiding out there?
@Evil_Peter8 ай бұрын
I love this movie. One of the best sequels ever made, despite that there is so much time between it and the original. It stands alone at the same time as it's continuing the story and themes of the original, both delving deeper and presenting new questions. Denis Villeneuve is a true master of his craft. He always brings great visuals, great score/atmosphere, great acting performances, and stories worth thinking about long afterwards. I highly recommend reacting to more of his films.
@Vulcanerd8 ай бұрын
It may be the best duology or 1 and 2 of any set of movies ever.
@neighborlyfiend14848 ай бұрын
One of my early memories is watching blade runner with my dad in the 80s. I rewatched it with my dad before taking him to see this in theaters. Such a great memory and time with dad.
@CSM100MK28 ай бұрын
That's awesome
@Theomite8 ай бұрын
What'd he think of it?
@neighborlyfiend14848 ай бұрын
@@Theomite we both loved it. My dad called the memory maker super fast LOL I didn't catch it till nearly the end.
@archsomnia8 ай бұрын
The entire film I was getting more and more angry in the cinema, wondering why it was taking them so long to discover he was the child... I love the film even more for that.
@ChronosTachyon8 ай бұрын
I actually love this movie more than the original Blade Runner. I didn't check this out until after I'd seen Arrival, and realized that Villeneuve was someone working on a level that we haven't seen much of in Hollywood for decades. But once I did, I adored every second of it. The ending with K drifting off to sleep in the snow as he dies is absolutely perfect, as is the pregnant silence of Deckard and his daughter seeing one another for the first time. I love that you mentioned theme, because this is such a deeply, carefully thematic movie. It's very much a meditation on childhood and parenthood and dependence and upbringing and abandonment... Those are kind of soft spots for me as a topic, and I always love to see them done well. It's easy for them to hurt me in the wrong way, but when Villeneuve hurts me, he leaves me feeling like I've healed a little bit in the process. Regarding the original Blade Runner itself, there is some real magic in that last third, and Rutger Hauer deserved an Oscar for that monologue performance, but I kind of despise the pacing of film noir thanks to all the faster-paced derivatives I grew up on. Same as for Westerns, actually. I mean, why would I watch A Fistful of Dollars when I have Back to the Future 3 and one-off Western episodes in my 20 minute episode daily cartoons like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles? I mean, I love Blade Runner, but when younger generations look back at the movies of my era and say they're "slow", it both makes me wince that something like Predator or Aliens now falls into that category, but it also makes me nod my head in recognition at that feeling of boredom and impatience. To quote 2013 Tumblr: "mood".
@TheRodentSama8 ай бұрын
Villeneuve did the impossible with this movie and made a sequel to Blade Runner... what I like are the subtle nuances, especially the piano tone... if you notice, the key he presses in Vegas, is the same key he found the sock at Sapper's house. Villeneuve's movie Prisoners is a also fantastic look into the psyche of humanity and what it means to be right or wrong. I think the only thing Villeneuve needs help with is the marketing team. They revealed Harrison Ford in the trailers and posters, but they weren't meant to. It was meant to be a secret reveal... they did the same with his movie Dune and marketed Zendaya heavily as a main role, and she was only in the movie for about 45 seconds.
@donaldb18 ай бұрын
"That conversation around what's real and what's not" is kind of Philip K Dick's thing. All his stories are about real and fake and they link that theme to a moral judgement. For him fake worlds and fake people are always a bit dodgy, dangerous, sick, or outright evil. I think that's a difference between the book and films. For Dick the androids are absolutely unhuman and the story is more focussed on the danger of humans coming to act like machines as well. In the films, on the other hand, replicants come to be seen (by the audience at least) as something like an alternative form of life, rather than unambiguously inferior, and we come to feel some sympathy for them (even if they don't feel for us). So it's the same themes, but addressed from slightly different angles.
@CSM100MK28 ай бұрын
Highly recommend anyone here to read his short stories! Very easy fast reads and packed with compelling ideas and twists.
@aaronbenson27678 ай бұрын
You checked out during the battle between K and Luv..?? That was one of the most intense scenes! This film was one of the best ones to come out in the past 20 years. Easily one of the greatest sequels ever made.
@TheChromeRonin8 ай бұрын
I liked this movie. The element of at what point does an AI have a soul. To K, joy was real. Joy thought she was real, the telling line, I’ve been inside you, there’s not as much there as you think, and K seeing the giant Joy hologram ad, calling him Joe, but then the despair in Joys face at the car crash, and wanting to be real. Just fantastic, and echoes K also wanting to be real.
@ComicCrossing8 ай бұрын
To K he wanted her to be real. But in the end she wasnt. Which was the point. And why he decided to save Deckard in the end. Making his own decision for the first time in his life. Joi was never real. Everything she did was fulfilling her programming to be the best product she could be. Getting K to buy more products. The emanator. Presumably the prostitute replicant. The food. All Wallace products.. The best way she could fulfill her programming to someone like K was to be how she was.
@danielpeckham55208 ай бұрын
Any atheist would point out that robots lacking a soul is the same as humans lacking a soul, there is no proof that such things exist. Buddhism doesn't believe in souls either, but a stream of consciousness that is not unique to humans anyway. I think it's clear in the movie that the replicants are as real as any other humans. The question of Joi is interesting, whether she has her own volition or is just programmed. She is the most real relationship that Joe has, and helps him a great deal.
@pseudohacker8 ай бұрын
@@danielpeckham5520a being having emotions, thoughts and responses partly programmed and partly voluntarily is also not different from humans or other living beings.
@danielpeckham55208 ай бұрын
@@pseudohacker yes, that's true. The same nature vs nurture issues apply to both
@ComicCrossing8 ай бұрын
The stuff with Joi and K is so fascinating. That scene where he sees the giant hologram may be my favorite of all time. Just the heartbreak and realization at realizing that everything he though he ever had and cherished was never real. Joi was a program designed to make suit his every need. Even doing her job so well that he bought more Wallace products. Which was the whole point. To sell more merchandise. Then he decides to do the only real thing he could possibly do. Die in a way of his own choosing. Saving someone.
@ChronosTachyon8 ай бұрын
I like to think that Joi was truly sentient. But the point of K's journey is that, just because you're sentient doesn't mean you are thinking for yourself. Joi loved K because she was programmed by Wallace's company to love her owner, which is not really all that different from how children are born programmed to love their parents: just as a child's well-being depends on their parents caring for them, Joi's well-being depended on K doing the same. It wasn't healthy by any means, but it may well have been genuine. (The unhealthiness being made worse since she was even more dependent on her manufacturer than on K, and therefore inclined to trust Wallace and his products.)
@cosmocoatl8 ай бұрын
@@ChronosTachyonyeah I like pondering the ambiguity of Joi's sentience, how her "realness" changes with the eminator, and how being preprogrammed relates to the question of whether free will even exists.
@SuzakuX6 ай бұрын
@@ChronosTachyon Yes, I feel the same. Joi may be artificial but that doesn't mean her love wasn't real, to her or to him. Love is just chemicals and synapses and memories... That's before getting into the reality that consciousness itself is most likely just an illusion -- a byproduct of the way our brains function (MRI research has shown that the bain activity for decision-making occurs before we consciously make decisions). So if consciousness is just a byproduct, then who's to say that AI doesn't experience similar byproducts?
@ThefetchNZ8 ай бұрын
This isn’t a movie. This is cinema. Cinema isn’t popular today. The art of storytelling through film isn’t popular now. I love how you see the colours, tones, nuances in the experience of true cinema. ❤
@diamondem8 ай бұрын
27:56 The billboard with JOI said "Everything you want to see, everything you want to hear". It's up for interpretation, but I took it to mean Joi is programmed to tell you things you want to hear and to be the things you need her to be. Which would mean "Joe" wanted to believe he was the child. It all goes to the theme that Blade Runner is all about which is basically what does it mean to be real?
@connorhalo8 ай бұрын
One of my favorite films of all time and absolutely on the short list of best sequels. I like it more than the original.
@jeffrogers21808 ай бұрын
Blade Runner is my favorite movie of all time, so it was a big relief when this one turned out so well, because it didn't screw up the legacy of the original.
@derred7238 ай бұрын
100 percent. He went out of his way to make the worlds seem the same fromthe colors to the lighting and especially the soundtrack and the mood. It was all meant to feel like the original.
@luckyzwrx8 ай бұрын
Top 5 of all time for me. Absolutely love this movie. So beautiful in so many ways. The idea of him feeling special, thinking it was him, discovering it wasn't, but then sacrificing himself for something greater. Truly defining what it means to be human. To feel love. Just, beautiful. It pains me so much that movies like this won't be financially successful for coming generations and therefor movies like this will become more and more rare.
@nth_to_see_here8 ай бұрын
IMO one of the very few movie sequels that stands up to the original.
@CSM100MK28 ай бұрын
Thank you for being my movie watching BFF and always doing such a wonderful job with your videos. SO EXCITED for his one, Blade Runner and it's sequel are so special to me, and this is one of the greatest sequels ever. I watched it in theaters and and in the big screen with the big speakers it just absolutely blew me away, I was transported and filled with emotion. Thanks for sharing your insights and attention to movie making details, because that's what we do here!
@edwinrollins1428 ай бұрын
I've been anticipating you getting round to this one. Villeneuve is the GOAT!
@SteveMcbrain8 ай бұрын
I prefer the sequel over the original
@tsmartin8 ай бұрын
Sicario is a must watch.
@Vulcanerd8 ай бұрын
Whether you prefer the original or 2049, the world building and the central theme of what it means to be 'alive' is absolutely compelling and each film is just as worthy as the other.
@notjustforhackers42528 ай бұрын
I second watching "Her". Great film.
@mattdellarosa73658 ай бұрын
Lol, don't feel bad that you didn't know his daughter was the dream maker Shanelle. But, and this may not be the best time to mention this but you also didn't pick up on the fact that they were in Vegas in the end. The elvis hologram was meant to be a dead giveaway.
@ShanelleRiccio8 ай бұрын
I thought they were but didn't say it, now im kicking myself because I could've looked really cool to the audience if i got it 😂
@mrch62008 ай бұрын
"we made the most expensive art house film in history" i'm okay with that :) my favorite movie. loved your commentary as well 🤠
@GeoffreyToday8 ай бұрын
The nature of replicants is, I think, sometimes misunderstood by people new to the story. The opening text of Blade Runner is largely to blame. By calling replicants the next phase of robot evolution, the impression is that Replicants are mechanical machines. The movie doesn't make it abundantly clear that replicants are genetically engineered life forms. They are grown, their dna designed by the genetic designers like the ones we met in the first film. The moral disconnect becomes that humans have learned how to design life, and in doing so have devalued that life to avoid the ethical responsibilities of that achievement. They aren't "really" alive because they were artificially made.
@The_RedVIII8 ай бұрын
They do also seem to be stronger than normal humans though, which makes it even more confusing, but whatever.
@GeoffreyToday8 ай бұрын
@@The_RedVIII They're engineered to be stronger.
@jeffrogers21808 ай бұрын
Yes... That's Edward James Olmos in both movies... Maybe you could do the Battlestar Galactica pilot and treat it as a standalone movie... He's great in it.
@garricksmalley17338 ай бұрын
I concur
@jeffkoenig74028 ай бұрын
So say we all.
@Madbandit778 ай бұрын
Olmos is also brilliant in the TV cop drama, "Miami Vice". Earned an Emmy Award.
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
My all-time favorite movie, supplanting the original. I was so afraid that Villeneuve would screw it up, but he succeeded beyond my wildest expectations and cemented himself as a director you can trust (along with Nolan). The score is brilliant and the film itself is stunningly beautiful and perfectly realized. There is so much potential in the world of “Blade Runner” - hopefully we will see more of it.
@danielpeckham55208 ай бұрын
A tv series is being developed. Also the recent anime, and coming video game. I'm sure I read there was supposed to be some comics too
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
@@danielpeckham5520 “Blade Runner Black Lotus”, the anime series, was quite good. I am worried that the Amazon “Blade Runner 2099” series won’t be.
@Yggdrasil428 ай бұрын
The radioactive place in the desert is Las Vegas. Great twist. We all thought it was him. I love the slow scenes so much, the colors, music, atmosphere...
@portland-1828 ай бұрын
Tony Scott was the star of Ridley's first short film 'Boy and Bicycle'. There are quite a few 'Philip K Dick' movies, even the not so great ones have good things in them. Adjustment Bureau, Pay Check, Minority Report, Screamers, and A Scanner Darkly are all worth a look.
@joeybossolo78 ай бұрын
The song at the end as Joe lies on the straits dying is the same as on the original BR’s “tears in the rain” monologue by Roy. Cinematic perfection.
@christianwise6378 ай бұрын
The visuals look stunning, a beautiful extension of the first film's aesthetic, brought to life perfectly by the magic touch of the legendary Roger Deakins (who won a long-overdue Oscar for his work on this film). Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch had the difficult job of following up Vangelis' seminal work on the first film, but they did a great job with the score, creating a brilliantly otherworldly sound and bringing back "Tears in the Rain" in perfect fashion. And the entire cast did a fantastic job, there's really not a single weak link here, everyone is perfect for their roles and all of them give fantastic performances. Doing a sequel to one of the most influential sci-fi films ever made 35 years after the fact could've very easily turned out terribly, but against all odds Denis Villeneuve accomplished that rare feat of making a sequel that's even better than the original. It sucks that it didn't do well at the box office, but I'm glad that it continues to get the acclaim and love it deserves.
@_Double_G8 ай бұрын
A great way to do a sequel. One of my favorites of all time. Also, yes the score is amazing.
@shuddupidc8 ай бұрын
Yesss, please do Minority Report! You’ll LOVE it. Old Hollywood storytelling but in a 21st century sci-fi story
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
Woohoo, been waiting all day for this! 😃Sorry for the other 2 videos getting struck, looks like the other Bladerunner got taken down. 😕
@prtrainor8 ай бұрын
I saw the original in a rain storm in LA where it was dripping in the older theater in 1982. I've seen the various versions and it remains about my fave movie. This was a very worthy follow up that I found lovely. I cried when his GF halogram went away for ever. Interesting side note. That seen at the farm at the start of the movie, was originally a part of the 82 film that was cut. I'm glad you enjoyed these.
@chris...94978 ай бұрын
Dripping rain inside a (presumptive) dilapidated movie theater; can't get more atmospheric or dissolving the 4th wall than that!
@sheryldalton89658 ай бұрын
"Lars & the real girl" is my favorite RG character. A sweet, quirky, funny movie with a great cast.
@Do0msday8 ай бұрын
This was one of the best movies to watch at the theater. I saw it in Dolby Cinema at AMC and the sound for this was *THE* best of any movie I've ever seen. It was phenomenal and my goodness was this movie beautiful on a big screen. It's about as perfect of a sequel as we could have hoped for 'Blade Runner'. This movie is a gem.
@mypl5108 ай бұрын
Like I said in the first movie, Rachael was the Unicorn. Special and one of a kind.
@MikeTaffet8 ай бұрын
20:54 This moment gave me flashbacks to Heath Ledger as the Joker and the pencil trick
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
15:00 - God Shanelle, you're always so impatient! 😂
@ericmarois69608 ай бұрын
Believe it or not this movie was part of Denis Villeneuve honing his skill in preparation for Dune which he has never been really shy about wanting to bring to the big screen. If you want to see more of his work before seeing Dune I strongly recommend Arrival which is also sci-fi and also very different from Blade Runner 2049. Don't want to spoil anything so I will stop here. Great movie and reaction, as always. Thank you much. See you again soon.
@Hackspear2148 ай бұрын
See mentioned in the intro that Arrival is one of her favorite movies of all time…
@ericmarois69608 ай бұрын
You're right, I missed that detail when I first watched the video. I would have loved to watch her reaction to that movie... I did look for it before posting and didn't see it hence me suggesting it after missing it mentioned in the intro as you pointed out. Thanks. I stand corrected.
@christophermitchell63078 ай бұрын
2 extra bits of trivia for you shanelle just incase you didn't see when you read them out: 1. While shooting the fight scene, Harrison accidentally punched Ryan in the face for real. As an apology, Harrison invited Ryan to share a bottle of scotch whiskey with him an then mooned him 🤭. 2. A visual effects company worked for a full year on the scene where Rachel appears exactly as she did 35 years ago in the original blade runner in 1982. Also you said you prefer Ryan gosling playing the part of a daft character, well you should check out the film "the nice guys" with Ryan, Russell Crowe and directed by Shane black (Hawkins in Predator).
@John_Locke_1088 ай бұрын
Not sure what's more insulting. Being punched or being offered something as disgusting as scotch. I probably would have been punched Harrison Ford back if offered me scotch.
@Theomite8 ай бұрын
I hate THE NICE GUYS for making me like it. I was so disappointed with KISS KISS, BANG BANG.
@DavidLopez-qi8hb8 ай бұрын
It was heartbreaking when K realized that Joi's love for him was never real, he was just another Joe.
@tomd91708 ай бұрын
We're all Joe
@hacdietevuong41387 ай бұрын
Who's to said it was never real ? I think u're missing a big peace that this movie tries to convey
@tomd91707 ай бұрын
@@hacdietevuong4138 The movie said so. She was programmed to love the customer and say or act according to your needs and desires. You clearly realise it when Joi calls him Joe on the bridge indicating that the name Joe was just part of a programming and also pairs well with Joi.
@hacdietevuong41387 ай бұрын
@@tomd9170 The movie always hinted at you never know what's real and what's not. Joi is just zeroes and ones, but even then, she does things that's not in her program. Does Wallace program her to tell K "deletes her from the console and break the transmitter" ? No ofc not. Does Wallace program her to stand against them ? No. And finally, even in the face of death, she still tells him that she loves him. None of that is in her program, and with what u said, is Officer K also a program and nothing less ?. Is everything that "K" did was all programmed into him ever since the beginning ? You see the plot hole in ur logic here right
@hacdietevuong41387 ай бұрын
@@tomd9170 Officer K, the hooker girl, the Replicants and even the "Joi A.I". They're all more than just codes and programmes. They all did things that are even more human than humans in this movie. Just like in the original movie, they all earned, and found their humanity through their journey. That's something obvious that I think u missed
@Vorgaloth8 ай бұрын
I saw it in the theater. This was one of the very few films in my life that left me sitting in my seat for a while after it was over. The rest of the evening I just kept thinking about life - meaning, purpose, love, the difficult and complex nature of reality etc. I love this film and consider it the greatest sci-fi next to Terminator 2 and Aliens. The film score was magnificent too. I ended up writing a summation after having seen it a second time: There was no real decoy. It was purely on paper. K/Joe is utterly, completely, unequivocally unremarkable, thus his name, Joe... as in Average Joe. Joi does not possess a soul. She is completely fake. She is the other side of the Replicant coin and is made solely to please and coddle her owner/lover. Her entire branding scheme is that she'll be anything you want. Joi is K's fleeting dream of being special -- to be human, or as he put it, "to have a soul" -- so she always reinforced this to him. Just before Luv crushed her emanator she made sure in her final moment to tell him that she loved him. Wallace posed a question about whether Deckard was moved by love or by programming. To me there's no doubt whatsoever Deckard is fully human. The original movie is about a bad man finding his humanity through the grace of a machine. Wallace's question is not a literal "Are you human or machine?" question, but pondering what the difference is; if love is just neurochemistry, and if we are products of biological programming or something higher, like a soul. The ultimate takeaway is that it really doesn't matter. What matters is what we choose to do with our lives. We find and create our own meaning and purpose. In summary, 2049 is about dreams and delusions. K wants desperately to feel special so Joi tells him this constantly and he quickly assumes all the evidence points to him because it's his dream. He becomes deluded and forces himself into the situation even as it destroys him. He thinks this is what it means to be human - to grapple with one's humanity. Then upon meeting Freysa, K comes to learn that in fact he is not special after all. Not born but manufactured. He is torn between two sides telling him what his identity is and should be; the LAPD who informs his identity as that of a slave, and the resistance which informs his identity as that of a free Replicant. When K comes across the giant pink Joi on the bridge, she says to him "You look like a good Joe". He then realizes that not even the name his Joi gave him was special. Her feelings for him were never real... just programming. K, at this point an emotionally broken Replicant, it is in this moment that he chooses to follow his own path and not let anyone tell him who he is or what he should do. He makes the most human decision of all and takes his life into his own hands. He saves Deckard for the same reason Roy did in the first Blade Runner. He wanted someone to remember him, for his final decision that fully validates him as human to not be in vain. No one else gave him his identity, only he did, and his sacrifice ensured forever that he was by every metric a human being, even if the world would ultimately forget him.
@Hackspear2148 ай бұрын
I’m actually surprised you didn’t geek out over the transition in the film from the burning embers cracking above the fire to the spinners flying through the city. It’s my favorite transition in any film.
@dvdmike0078 ай бұрын
The first wasn't originally blue, that was a final cut revision
@criss_x8 ай бұрын
wait, the line cells within cells is from Pale Fire by Nabokov, the book that his holo girlfriend didn't like. So I mean I guess it was Gosling's idea to do the baseline but it's odd the trivia didn't mention that and just mentioned Gosling.
@christopherten-eyck44738 ай бұрын
Mind blowing special effects. Thanks for another awesome reaction. Love this channel ❤️ ❤❤. Hello from Pa USA 🇺🇸.
@Daren_PNW8 ай бұрын
RE: 2 big statues heading to Deckard. Every time I see them, I wonder if there's any nod to The Sphinx Gate from The NeverEnding Story. 🤔
@danielpeckham55208 ай бұрын
I never thought of that, interesting..
@shainewhite27818 ай бұрын
This took 35 years to make, and I think it was worth it. It took home Best Visual Effects and Best Cinematography.
@chairmanofthebored68608 ай бұрын
As well it should have. Just a beautifully shot movie.
@ReverendLondo8 ай бұрын
People complain, but this is a fine spiritual successor for "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?"
@ReverendLondo8 ай бұрын
Can a holographic program and an android feel more real and alive than I do? If I can say "yes" to those questions, then that is solid sixties-style sci-fi.
@xTheLovelyRosex8 ай бұрын
I loved this movie and sobbed at the ending in theaters, no one else had the reaction around me and I’ve always felt like I’ve had to defend my love of this film. it’s so refreshing to see that other people loved this as much as I did ❤
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
34:27 - Oh yeah, I remember watching a video about that! He was like adamant that Deckard had to be a replicant.
@Lex-up6mg8 ай бұрын
“Can’t they actually fffff touch” 😂
@lysolcoke2HD4 ай бұрын
The poetic irony at the end, the "fake" boy outside in the real snow with the real girl inside with the fake snow. So a gorgeous movie, I worked at a movie theater when this came out and I burned quite a few free tickets to see this at least once or twice a week for it's whole run. Denis Villeneuve is such a masterful director, and everything he does has this "every frame a painting" feel. This, Sicario, Dune, Arrival, all incredible. Some of the best, and I usually hate to use this word, cinema in the last 20 years. Would love to see you check out Arrival and Sicario on this channel if you haven't seen them already.
@Dr3amtime8 ай бұрын
Lieutenant Joshi has come a long way from her early years as Wesley's Buttercup and Forrest's Jenny.
@Madbandit778 ай бұрын
Robin Wright is a goddess.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
10:52 - Yeah, that and 1991 Æon Flux shorts on Liquid Television. 😉
@LordVolkov8 ай бұрын
Though it meanders a bit in the middle (the car crash and missile strike could be cut without affecting the plot), I do really enjoy BR2049. Probably my first exposure to Ana De Armas and I was a fan at first sight. Who wouldn't have a JOI if they looked like her?
@mauz45888 ай бұрын
Sylvia Hoeks, who plays Luv, does an amazing job at playing her villains with a unique craziness, and making her characters people you love to hate. She's the antagonist in the series 'SEE', and is wonderful in it. The series Blade Runner: Black Lotus is set between the original movie and the sequel, and features a younger Wallace in it. They do a good job of depicting the way that Wallace manipulates his replicants and plays them off each other so that you end up with Luv's "I'm the best one!" mentality. It's very possible that the main character in that series is meant to be an early version of Luv, and like Luv, doesn't have the programming to not harm humans.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
13:29 - Whatever you say, JLo! 😂
@colbyboucher63918 ай бұрын
Something I think many people miss is that where in the first film, replicants have an artificial lifespan of four years to prevent them from becoming too emotional, Neander Wallace's solution is to come up with a way to make them obey anyways. They live plenty long enough to experience all the emotion of an angsty preteen and then some, but they're somehow psychologically programmed to swallow it down and move on with their lives rather than questioning what it means.
@danielpeckham55208 ай бұрын
Thanks for the reaction. I just saw your Blade Runner reaction last night, so this was a real joy. 2049 is an amazing movie, the visuals and music especially. Definately a worthy sequel. They are making a tv series set in 2099 so hopefully that will work out well. Btw Harrison Ford confirmed just this year that he always knew Deckard was a replicant.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
17:07 - And I'd reply: "Really? You look more like a Chuck to me..." 😆
@joeblankenship3778 ай бұрын
Check out "Drive" if you haven't seen it. Ryan Gosling does his blank stare acting technique all through that one. It's pretty good.
@rcmorl63908 ай бұрын
A week?!...a whole week!?! I had to wait 40 years...not fair😢 so glad you did it right away though, could have druven me crazy waiting.( And i cant say much when i binged the entire Return to Twin Peaks in a weekend) Loved your reaction and loved this movie alone and sequel. A fitting visual and storyline homage and next step for a great movie.
@timothyhedrick52958 ай бұрын
@22:15 Between the sexual statues and the holograms of Elvis and dancing showgirls, I always interpreted this as being the Las Vegas strip.
@Joshu_Y8 ай бұрын
This was so surprisingly good back when I saw it in the cinema, I called it "maybe the best sequel to anything ever?" And I think it's probably still holding that title. It managed to be new and at the same time have the classic Blade Runner spirit. I like it more each time I see it.
@eatsmylifeYT8 ай бұрын
"Can they actually physically f...touch?" That got me laughing a bit.
@corneliusoverton26178 ай бұрын
Best Philip K. Dick movie, by far, is A Scanner Darkly. All star cast (Keanu Reeves, Winona Ryder, Woody Harrelson, Robert Downey Jr., etc), unique animation/rotorscope style. Super messed up ending. Totally worth checking out.
@zmarko8 ай бұрын
When Joi tells K she loves him right as Luv steps on her stick, destroying her breaks my heart every time.
@clayjohanson8 ай бұрын
But did she really love him, or was that just programming?
@billbabcock18337 ай бұрын
When Ford threw a punch at Gosling during the fight in the casino showroom, Ford misjudged and actually punched Gosling. And it was a hard punch. Gosling stayed in character and the looking on his face after the punch was real too.
@KabukiKid8 ай бұрын
Not only is this one of the best sequels I have ever seen, it is one of the best science fiction movies I have ever seen. Absolutely loved it and it surpassed my expectations. I want to marry Denis Villeneuve. lol Love that guy! :-)
@cowsmooloud8 ай бұрын
This was a spectacular sequel. I didn't read reviews, but everyone I know and everything I heard was very positive on it. Rather shocking it did badly at the box office, but we've been heading away from 'going out to the movies' gradually decade by decade. I have loved every Denis directed movie I've seen [6 thus far]. I'm only missing one that I'm aware of to date.
@CousinWhatIsIt8 ай бұрын
Definitely do Minority Report 👍
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
Oh, I TOTALLY second that!
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
1:38 - Just want to point out once again, as this one came up under suggestion for westerns in the last livestream: Sicario is NOT in fact a western.
@Madbandit778 ай бұрын
Sicario isn't a Western, but it has the soul of one.
@arraymac2277 ай бұрын
Was thinking that the Wallace character was under developed here, but that led me to think how spare Tyrell's role was. No harm, no foul.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
39:29 - Oh yeah! Dude won't shut up about it! 😂
@rg33888 ай бұрын
I love the ending with Deckard's Mona Lisa-style quarter smile. It's not so much that Deckard is or isn't a replicant, but that he BETTER not be, or else much of the story is wasted.
@worth4328 ай бұрын
i also saw this in imax in an empty theatre and it was the most visually stunning and engrossing film i've ever seen
@sean---the-other-one8 ай бұрын
Of all the Phillip K Dick adaptations, the one you’d probably love most is A Scanner Darkly. Such a wild trip.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
12:44 - We all wanna know. And the whole hydrate thing is overblown.
@dernwine8 ай бұрын
My favourite thing is the fan theory that Officer K (Ryan Gosling) in Blade Runner 2049 is Ken (Ryan Gosling) from the Barbie movie and that Blade Runner is a direct sequel in which Ken is trying to find his own path.
@yourthaiguy8 ай бұрын
Denis villenuave did such an awesome job on this film… really faithful in look and feel to the original
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
33:17 - Yeah, I think so too. I suppose he got credited because they used his characters and settings and all, and extended the story.
@danholmesfilm8 ай бұрын
Saw Blade Runner for the first time right before this in a Double Feature opening night, pretty amazing :)
@MrGpschmidt8 ай бұрын
Come for the existential angst and anomie , stay for the giantess imagery - oh baby - you so need to see this in IMAX because a 100 foot Ana de Armas needs to be experienced. Denis does a Herculean job in not only honoring the source film but in many ways surpassing it.
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
12:03 - Well don't look at me, I couldn't make out what it was! 🤷♂
@NerdFunkGangsta8 ай бұрын
Great reaction. If you like intelligent sci fi I think you’d really enjoy Battlestar Galactica. Would love to see a reaction to to the 2part mini series. You won’t regret it!
@TheJamieRamone8 ай бұрын
21:03 - Um...the Southern Oracle in Fantasia? 🤭
@Atlas_Redux8 ай бұрын
Dammit Shanelle, it's late here in Norway, and I need my beauty sleep. Very well, a little less sleep for my pretty, pretty face then, sigh.
@ShanelleRiccio8 ай бұрын
SORRY! I was slacking on this one, I meant to post way earlier!
@derrickbias34068 ай бұрын
@30:15 no you're smart. They used the Kay's perspective to give false assumptions to the audience. I like how they don't spell everything out for us and leave things ambiguous like they did in the first film, "is the dog real? What do you think?".