South Park's GROSSEST episode just became reality...

[@Bloomser]

Go to buyraycon.com/blooms for 20-50% off sitewide! Brought to you by Raycon.

[@jellydonutstudios9186]

Nice

[@SomethingAboutCheese]

ok dawg

[@Bumbo-busines]

No, I dont wanna :(

[@MurtyOnYou]

Imagine not buying Raycon

[@user-xXC4L1B3RXx]

Can use them to listen to iTunes

[@FernandoJCruz-kt1zo]

Butters reading the terms and conditions and then calmly saying "decline" will never be not funny to me.

[@Aroaceenby]

It's more how he says it that gets me. "I think I'll click on...decline."

[@latetotheparty7551]

Pimp Butters was peak.

[@morepoppunkthanpizza]

@@latetotheparty7551 Butters Bottom Bish

[@maxxcrafting7519]

Yeah, i did a giggle at it

[@KampzOnXbox]

bro i actually started laughing out loud so hard😂

[@malenlhewig]

In Germany, its forbidden to write things in TOS that would be unpredictable to be in it

[@neraslight4997]

Well thank god for germany

[@I.____.....__...__]

@@neraslight4997 Germany sent Armin Meiwes to prison for eating Bernd Brandes despite there being plenty of video proving it was 100% consensual, by arguing that when Bernd drank wine to numb the pain and make it easier to cut his junk off to eat, that made him no longer capable of consenting. That's the stupidest argument ever uttered in court. If that's valid, then nobody can ever get surgery (with anesthetic) again. 🙄

[@zerpiente]

​@@I.____.....__...__I don't think we should accept a world were people can kill and eat others with no consequences, outside of life or death situations at least

[@neraslight4997]

My guy you literally just described a guy who cannibalized another person and your excuse that it was justified was that it was “consensual”, i would really hate to know what your opinions on other things in the world are, what the hell man..

[@loRd1111]

This sub comments section is gold 😅 could been right out of South Park

[@Superabound2]

Fun fact: any contact is automatically null and void if you were under the effects of drugs or alcohol when you agreed to it, so just be sure to be drunk or high every time you agree to a ToS. Or just 24/7, to be safe

[@Diablo_Himself]

You'd have to prove you were at the time.

[@darth_sidious_sheev_palpatine]

So your moving to Wisconsin, see you soon!

[@harrybudgeiv349]

@@Diablo_Himself The company has to prove that you were of sound mind when signing the contract.

[@wolfy7592]

Yes see how it mostly works is, you take them to court, they defend against your claim by proving your claim wrong

[@TheVoiceOfChaos]

@@harrybudgeiv349 tbh i see a loophole here

[@billbill6094]

Keep in mind Terms and Conditions aren't just skipped by convenience, they are _designed_ to be too long to justify reading for the kind of service they provide and use confusing legalese and non-sensical structure to make sure you don't understand what you're reading. The effort to look up and comprehend what you're reading is made to take longer than just reading all the way through. I remember reading the T&C for so many services over a decade ago, they were a few paragraphs that boiled down to "don't use this for anything illegal". Now just one is the equivalent of reading a short novel, include so many privacy intrusions and you need to agree to hundreds.

[@xshiromorix]

Not only that, but it's not uncommon for ToS these days to have clauses that attempt to deny you rights you legally have. They count on you not knowing that.

[@iconicnzz6414]

In a twisted sort of way, those T&C reports are works of art in and of themselves. Remember making the dumbest and laziest garbage you could scrawl together into a full page essay the night before it was due in school? It was someone's job to take "Don't sue us and by the way we own you now" and expand it into the Silmarillion.

[@ChoompaLoompa1985-uw8lw]

I love it that South Park is gross for cartooning the actual gross movie the Human Centipede 😅

[@beanman29393]

I know its just putting a bandaid on the comically large knife wound but just use chatgpt to summarise it before you agree

[@lostbutfreesoul]

Indeed: Another thing to keep in mind - it isn't just one. When you take the number of applications used daily, you would give up a huge chunk of your life reviewing TOS agreements!

[@goobgob031]

I love Steam for just being like "If we somehow kill you, you CAN sue us" and I respect that

[@itsmefirefox]

Steams only doing this so they can wrap the 50k individual arbitration cases into one class action law suit, I think that's the right kind of lawsuit anyway

[@Cold_Cactus]

Valve is the goat

[@sanderwrong9106]

That is not the reason Steam changed their TOS. They currently have several thousand cases in arbitration alleging that they abuse their monopoly power

[@TheOpticalMouse]

Which is, imo, fucking hilarious in concept. ​@@sanderwrong9106

[@milkman4407]

@@sanderwrong9106well I mean, is it really a monopoly if the only reason they’re on top is cause their competitors keep killing themselves?

[@Patrick_The_Pure]

Remember people, pirating everything Disney related is not just morally the right thing to do, it's your duty to do so.

[@spazmcat3853]

and safer too

[@TheReaverOfDarkness]

Paying for the content also makes it more difficult to consume. Your odds of being stopped by anti-piracy measures increase when you don't pirate the media.

[@snowyyzoe]

I remember seeing a Disney animator watching her own work on a pirating site so even the employees approve of this message 🫡

[@pepsioverlord]

Fuck disney,They make shit movies now,They refused a grieving father to put his sons favourite character on a grave,Refused to pay a man whose wife died at Disney world because he signed up to disney plus,The list goes on,Walt Disney hating kids in his days,And their poor management killed someone on a monorail at Disneyland Florida when ot crashed,Didn't have proper filters on their Waterpark on a lake causing a kid to get brain eating amoeba and die.They are morally evil.

[@JamesTDG]

It literally is the ONLY way to avoid forced arbitration nowadays

[@Nagatem]

Disney is so evil and morally bankrupt at this point that they told a grieving family they cannot put spiderman on their dead 4 year olds grave because it wouldn’t be in character for spiderman…..

[@pvzgamer6029]

Disney: who’s this Uncle Ben character?

[@rynemcgriffin1752]

@@pvzgamer6029Disney: “Spider-Man does what for sick kids all the time?! We never sanctioned that! Throw him in the Disney Vault!”

[@777idkineedausername]

Who are you to take their characters, regardless of circumstances, what, is it going to make the kid happy?

[@Manny4Life948]

@@777idkineedausername it is literally just an image of the hero the child loved, what is wrong with giving the family their wish?

[@gamefan56]

@@777idkineedausernameHow is putting spiderman decorations on your deceased sons grave the same as taking the character?

[@nataliaborys1554]

14:50 - "It does email, and browsing, AND shits in Kyle's mouth!?" is such a Cartman line, I love it.

[@LukeTheNotSoFunnyCheetoMan]

Whats sad that If Disney was able to refuse a lawsuit for signing up for Disney Plus and didnt get called out, I don't even want to imagine how far Disney and other companies might go and might be even worse

[@gezz5904]

Last I heard, like, yesterday, I heard they ended up just giving the guy the win after all the backlash. Pathetic that it took them receiving that backlash to do the right thing.

[@gremlininthesystem]

Didn't the dude win the allergy lawsuit? But uhh, yeah, after that scenario i think ill take the time for once to actually read tos

[@sekarmaltum1695]

Remember the 19th century american capitalists: Companies have done, do and will do -anything and EVERYTHING they can get away with. And if they are big enough, they will lobby("legal" corruption) or go for old fashioned corruption, to make sure that they will in the future!

[@sekarmaltum1695]

For fucks sake, even in the 20th century, chicita fucking overthrew a south american government!!!

[@Kinosa-u1w]

Pretty sure it s going to get so bad you will have the money to get the new IPhone But the TOS will be so strict and restrictive it would take lobotomy and severe brain damage to accept the TOS

[@gyrrakavian]

The man who _literally_ wrote the book on user friendliness for Apple back in the day _hates_ how the company designs things these days.

[@simunator]

that's why he had to die. he cared about quality, not profits

[@kayagorzan]

Who?

[@andreyhenriquethomas9554]

@kayagorzan I gathered that they talking about Steve Jobs

[@KetsubanSolo]

The ironic bit is that Disney COULD have managed to avoid looking bad, because the restaurant in question was basically just renting from them. All Disney had to say was "that's not our fault, take it up with that restaurant."

[@azzz1578]

That definitely still looks bad and heartless. Still would have been better than you agreed not to 4 years ago in the TOS of a free trial for a service you don’t use though

[@neglectfulsausage7689]

INteresting that she died from elevated nut levels when ms crabtree the bus driver died of something similar in earlier seasons.

[@erinjackson8119]

First of all.... lower your voice, they might hear you.

[@P.T.S.E.]

Disney was sued for two reasons: they were the bigger fish and the restaurant was probably advertised on their resort's site as catering to the needs of those with severe allergies - that was the specific reason why the couple chose to stay there in the first place. So they did hold some responsibility. Also, the husband had to signed up for a Disney account too, when signing up for the streaming service and that account's ToS had the agreement about settling out of court, not the Disney+ acc. The husband used the same account to make the reservation to the resort, implying that the agreement was still considered as valid by both parties, and they used that as the reasoning for wanting to settle out of court. Considering the backlash (thanks to the misinformation that it was all thanks to signing up for Disney+ years ago) and that the husband was not suing for damages, but for accountability on behalf of his dead wife, who did not sign any agreement, the case was ruled in favor of the husband. Considering the damage this case have caused to their brand, it is unlikely that they would appeal.

[@mechaSurge]

​@@erinjackson8119 with them doing everything opposite of a good idea and this being a technically good idea for them i feel like they should hear it

[@pdpgb]

Another huge reason people don't bothering reading the ToS is because you HAVE TO agree to it if you want to use the service. And if you're at the stage where you're accepting ToS you clearly need to use the fucking service. If I'm making a KZbin account I can't just disagree to them being able to ban me at any time for any or no reason because otherwise I don't get to use the site. So even if it said something insane like you don't get to sue Google for the rest of your life you just have to click it. That's why the courts should absolutely just throw these agreements out whenever a company is overreaching. Whether they actually will is another question but that's the only way to fix this issue otherwise we're just relying on the good will of billion $ companies.

[@notster7114]

underrated comment

[@JamesTDG]

These agreements even affect you if you agreed to a much, MUCH older version of the TOS, because they can claim that you continuing to use the service (or even just plain not terminating your account) meant you agreed to the terms.

[@vixxcelacea2778]

EU has a law in place that if your legalese is too long and or purposefully complex and hard to understand, even when you agree to TOS, you can argue that it's meant to confuse and trick the consumer into something they otherwise would not agree to. Most companies here have it just to cover their bases, but there are protections for the average person to prevent "selling their soul" type deals. So if a company tries to say "well they agreed to it" it can be argued that they didn't because the language was purposefully confusing or intentionally long. Most people don't know how to read a legal document as it's not taught in schools.

[@DudeTheMighty]

@@vixxcelacea2778 It'd be nice if we had those protections here in the states. Sadly, I don't see it happening, given how many politicians have been bought out by large companies.

[@drunkslaver]

@@vixxcelacea2778 Also (at least in certain countries in the EU) there are laws that say if a EULA contains terms that violate basic human rights then the EULA is null and void.

[@GeorgeCowsert]

FYI: Most lawyers agree that TOS agreements fall under the category known as "shrinkwrap contracts." Shrinkwrap contracts are essentially stickers slapped onto products to say that the company is not liable for any damage the product may cause due to misuse or negligence on the consumer's part. However, it is a legal precedent that agreeing to a shrinkwrap contract can not and should never extend past that point. TOS agreements function the same way, but there has been a rare number of cases of TOS overreach that would cause the courts to put them back in line.

[@env0x]

do you know which law it is that states in what circumstances the courts are allowed to rescind a TOS contract?

[@vuhdoo7486]

@@env0x For the EU it's called "EU hierarchy of norms" with TOS having one of the lowest ranks possible. As far as I know, the same holds true for the states: Constitution > Laws > Regulations > Contracts since tos are part of the contract, they are even lower then a contract. so if anything contradicts a TOS the tos will not withhold. A lot of cases are won in the eu, by the customer since the company did not properly established the "right of withdrawal". General terms and conditions are invalid if they disproportionately disadvantage the customer. In addition, clauses that are surprising or non-transparent are also invalid. This applies in particular to provisions in which the intended use is not clearly and completely explained. (EU not US) I would assume that something like this exist in the states.

[@env0x]

@@vuhdoo7486 thank you very much

​@@vuhdoo7486 Tbh I wouldn't bet on something similar existing in the US. Their judicial system is quite different (with case laws instead of statutes) and court procedures benefit the side with more resources a lot.

[@leadpaintchips9461]

Legal precedent has no standing in the US anymore.

[@faithevers6899]

remember when disney wouldn’t let a grieving father put spiderman on his 7 ? year old sons grave because it was his favorite thing in the world and disney said :(( no too sad :((( we only do happy things :) death is too sad :(((

[@TramellPattersonjr]

I don’t care for Disney to defend them, but I will say that they can’t give a decision on Spider-Man because he’s owned by Sony and not them. They even need permissions 😂

[@v-14415]

@@TramellPattersonjr "😂" who puts this scheet in their comment

[@TramellPattersonjr]

@@v-14415 maybe someone who finds the irony in this case comical seeing that those accused of denying permissions in fact need them for themselves 🤷🏾. Maybe try not being a rock?

[@Pokechrome]

@@TramellPattersonjrSony only owns the movie rights, Disney owns the tv, toy, game, and comic rights to spider-man. They could have let that happen. But they are stupid.

[@CalvinSmart-tq5hd]

​@@v-14415 emojis are back in date dumbass😂

[@tokumei_llc]

Sooooo .... Here is the thing; As a person who has studied law, worked as a Federally appointed legal researcher, and held a Federally voted for position of Legal advisement; ALL of this is completely in violation of Federal legal standards, and actually not BY LAW, supported. First off as par to the standard practices of law ordained by the Federal Government within the United States (this MAY be different in other countries), A person who agrees to a contract, the terms of that contract CANNOT violate their constitutional rights, UNLESS, they willfully "CHOOSE" to personally uphold the agreement of that Contract in question. Meaning, that IF a contract says you loose the right to your 2nd amendment (as an example, and excluding places that are sovereign territories such as tribal land, or international factories, or not established with a Legally binding authority such as an incarceration facility, judge, or Federally appointed legal representative), BY federal standard of law, you ACTUALLY don't lose that 2nd amendment right, unless the contract in question has been signed off by all parties and is enforced by the US Supreme court. The lose of the 2nd amendment would instead be a CHOICE by the signatory party and not actually enforceable. Secondly; The contract CANNOT make you violate the law in any way. Nor can it MAKE YOU Kill another person, steal something, abduct another person, Speed, kill a political leader, torture, ect ect... Any contract you agree to that violates the rights of yourself or another citizen, or forces you to violate the law, is immediately null and void and CANNOT be held as legally binding within the United states. End of story. Third; The agreement the man in question made with Disney, ONLY applies to the service in question. Disney violated his Federal rights and coerced him into willingly withdrawing his case against them through social manipulation. IF the judge in question agreed with Disney, than the Man in question SHOULD APPEAL that case on grounds of violation of his rights, and a contract agreement that uses vague terms and is applying to multi jurisdictional bias, and not facilitating appropriate use of law. As the case in question had NOTHING to do with his agreement to a service, and had everything to do with his suffering, harm, and the gross negligence of staff members under Disney's employ. Making their argument in this case a violation of his and his families Federal rights, Null and void. The Judge in question handling the case needs to be reviewed at this point as well because there would be grounds of circumstantial Bias.

[@punkrat5704]

This is why we need people like you Jesus 😭

[@assassincat4942]

Thank you for spreading this information

[@TiL_Deimos]

thank you sir for saying it straight, thats a real lawyer right der

[@sparkeythehamster]

And this literally just happened again with Uber. A couple who were left with life altering injuries after an Uber crash couldn’t sue the company because their 12-year-old daughter had agreed to terms and conditions on Uber Eats while ordering a pizza that prevented them from suing the company.

[@Edward-vc7le]

A minor can't enter a legally binding contract ???? Where the fuck is the source for this I genuinely want to read it up

[@Confused_Master]

if a person(s) under the age of 18 signs a contract without the consent of a parent or legal guardian, then the contract is then null and void. Additionally if the daughter was the one to sign the contract then by letter of the law SHE couldn't sue, but her parents could provided they themselves did not agree to the TOS on their own account. Because you cannot sign another onto a legally binding contract without expressed consent.

[@spankeyham]

​@Confused_Master the terms are specific to the person, partner, and the heirs. So much overreach which will hopefully be trashed.

[@cary1056]

Every time they used Uber/UberEats they were agreeing to those terms and conditions, the daughter's order was just the latest time.

[@Ecliptor.]

@@Edward-vc7le a quick google brought it up in several news sites

[@utsutsu123]

hearing people skip this episode genuinely shocked me because i dont find this any weirder or grosser than anything else theyve done

[@indyanatham8958]

Personaly mr. Slave gives me ptsd whenever i see him on screen

[@oniemployee3437]

Just goes to show how horrible body horror is for some people, me included.

[@kjullthedemon]

@@oniemployee3437 Body horror is most vile form of horror. I hate body horror where you get mutilated like this, and have your freedom essentially taken from you. Stuff like The fly, or Cabin Fever, where it's more about you slowly deforming is easier to stomach for me.

[@oniemployee3437]

@@kjullthedemon I absolutely agree. I can watch gory kills in movies for quite a while, but actual body horror like mutations is too much for me. Bonus points if the victim is still alive.. yikes.

[@CrypticBore]

People not knowing the movie exists according to this video shocked me. Ya telling me i didnt have to watch it in highschool xD

[@garrettleatham7138]

I cancelled my Disney+ subscription the moment I saw Disney try to argue that. I'll never go back to a Disney owned park either since they can straight up murder my kids and say I can't sue them because of Disney+ T&C.

[@jessehammons2816]

Piracy is morally right

[@MrCmon113]

Too late. You already agreed.

[@SlothSandwhich]

@@MrCmon113fr he thinks he’s safe

[@Mojojojo9001]

Yeah the guy that had to deal with that last had Disney+ back in 2019. FIVE YEARS ago. You wanna know the best part of it though? *It was a free trial.*

[@777idkineedausername]

It became relevant because of the use of Disney's website. Stop just spreading rumors and check the source material. All you want to do is spread fear, not truth. I'm not siding with Disney, but the number of people who spread this fear second hand is 10 times as terrible as any big corporation.

[@Raoul.]

This episode really freaked me out as a kid. It made me scared of ToS agreements for a while.

[@pianoneko9279]

Same here. In fact, I might start reading them again from now on. 😅

[@joeyjello9807]

9:50 I think what makes the idea of referencing Humancentipid in this episode so much funnier is the fact, that by knowing it is a reference to a classic, the show is implying that Steve Jobs didnt even come up with the idea himself nor the apple team. They just stole it from a lesser known individual, reshaped some details and announce it as their own branch. Just like real Apple with its moder Smartphone features

[@emeraldfinder5]

ehhh, that seems like a stretch

[@Cold_Cactus]

They are smart guys , southpark has so much subtext thats missed by the dumb dumbs Check above comment for proof

[@NightsReign]

​@@Cold_Cactus South Park, the series for discerning adults who prefer their social commentary (and fart jokes) to be animated & satirized. A comfy medium between finding The Simpsons or Futurama too hand-holdy in delivering their intended message. And at the other extreme, Rick & Morty inexplicably being too obtuse or morally ambiguous with their messaging. Who can really say how many people got confused & irony-poisoned, and actually misinterpret, the subtext of Rick & Morty? People who coincidentally aren't aware that the character they've been identifying with, Rick Sanchez, is not the protagonist they mistake him for, he's actually the irredeemable villain. A similar misinterpretation as is done with Scott Pilgrim Saves the World (original movie). The "main character" stays high off their own supply & abuses everyone around them with their delusions of grandeur. The misunderstood anti-hero who's cursed with the dual burdens of a superior intellect, and also a deadpan delivery (others describe as "glib") of hard to swallow truths. "he's literally just like me fr!" is the fictional yarn I've heard woven by far too many... Rick's opinions/positions appearing to align with reality, have equal significance as the twice daily a busted timepiece accurately tells the current time (the Broken Clock meme). 🤡👍🏾 I know Bojack Horseman also belongs somewhere along this spectrum, but I'm honestly not quite sure 'where'. This comment ballooned on me, to an absolutely absurd degree! 😫

[@TripleOA]

@@NightsReign You say that Rick isn't the protagonist and is the villain, when protagonist is just the character the story follows(In non-omniscient perspectives, it's the character the camera follows, in omniscient it's the one the story follows) he is one of the two titular protagonists, while being the villain

[@fyrewatermelons]

The fact that people were out here *defending* Disney in this case and blaming the husband for "having a victim mentality." 💢 😡

[@777idkineedausername]

What kind of stupid argument is that in Disney's favor. There are plenty of real ones, and they went to that. That's dumber than the people fear mongering. Having a victim mentality means nothing in terms of being a victim, the two are mutually exclusive states.

[@killallkarens6847]

Those are 24/7 left vegan pole polishers

[@Dovah_Slayer]

That's a bunch of idiots for you as Albert Einstein said, "There's only 2 things that are infinite the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe"

[@halfbakedvidja]

Disney bots?

[@dorkish]

​@@halfbakedvidjaNo, it's just disney adult's and disney fanboys who tie their whole identity and ego to a soulless corporation who doesn't care one bit about them

[@bigdoubleu117]

The fact Disney's first response was what it was, obviously shows how evil they are, and they shouldn't get any credit for having a "change of heart."

[@DBZHGWgamer]

Ehh, it's a lot less a question of evil than it is incentives. They are a company, an entity that is not capable of thinking or taking action on its own. Rather any action taken is taken by people on behalf of the company. And often those people don't see the bigger whole because they are a small part of the company. The actions they take are based off what they are instructed and what they are incentivized to do. The result of every individual decision is what you see as the things "Disney" does.

[@mechaSurge]

​@@DBZHGWgamer well if Disney is technically a multicellular organization then i think they have a big tumor in their brain

[@wiel5908]

15:44 the irony of him using an apple computer screen

[@mid1429]

Mac is used a lot in the animation industry Mac is a good computer for business because its easy to run a decent amount of software for production stuff

[@wiel5908]

@@mid1429 i didnt say it doesnt have pros, but for me it makes them a little hypocritical

[@AllieMantegna]

Fr

[@raistlarn]

It's worse than Disney. Uber was getting sued by 2 people that were in a major accident when riding with their driver, and got the New Jersey supreme court to uphold their tos. Worst part is that due to their underaged daughter ordering a pizza off of Uber Eats (a separate app) they can't sue Uber. Tldr: Uber got the NJ Supreme Court to say a contract accepted by a minor in a separate app applies to a parents ability to sue.

[@Cold_Cactus]

You better start believing in dystopias.... because youre living in one

[@jokerofspades-xt3bs]

Welcome to 1984 lads! Better start learning Newspeak because it’s the only way for Disney to prevent us from having a negative thought!

[@RandomPersonOf2005]

Aren't minors not allowed to sign legally binding contracts?

[@saintcynicism2654]

@@RandomPersonOf2005 They can, within reason. For example, it's perfectly legal for a 17 year old to sign an employment contract for a summer job. How the court found that the minor daughter clicked the button that said she was 18 and that means the contract is valid in its entirety and she somehow waived her parents rights to sue is definitely the bigger mystery. You'd think "the person who signed this contract lied and wasn't actually able to sign according to its terms" would invalidate the contract or at least make it only apply to her, specifically.

[@oz_jones]

TL;DR goes to the beginning.

[@NormalNeu001]

In Germany and probably many other european countries you are safe from Corporations pulling something like this. We have laws that immediately void any contract that contains morally corrupt things.

[@FaviusArthum]

Sounds great

[@SurnaturalM]

We have this in Canada too and I do think New Zealand and Australia also have such laws.

[@cherubin7th]

Also surprising things in TOS are invalid unless you prove that they explicitly knew about that point. Because the idea is simple, you only consent to the parts of a contract you are knowingly consent too.

[@rivershen8199]

It's not the entire contract that gets void, just the part that goes against the law, the rest of the contract may remain valid.

[@schmid1.079]

Yep, companys put tons of stuff in their TOS that would simply be dismissed in european court. Putting something in a contract doesn't mean shit if it isn't lawful to begin with.

[@P1necone88]

Being a South Park animator must be the greatest awful experience ever.

[@env0x]

they streamline most of the animation now which makes things a lot easier and quicker, and why they can get through a single episode in a week. but when matt and trey first began animating they did everything by hand with cardboard cutouts, frame by frame, all by themselves.

[@wizardfucker8999]

Witnessing Matt and Trey's most grotesque ideas in storyboards, then having to give it life via animation and voice acting is a full-time job in of itself. My heart goes out to all those animators who had to work on Humancentipad LMAO

[@candiceattrill2272]

Funny your choice of wording. I am a blind south Park fan who watched for years enjoying dialogue, but not until that episode. Had I gotten to see anything with audio description. so it definitely brought the show more to life and I would say it’s definitely in my top three of gross episodes

[@Nerfhoopsdbd]

If you’re blind, how did you type this??

[@kittenthesmol7373]

​@@Nerfhoopsdbdtext2speech

[@moony3335]

@@Nerfhoopsdbdtext to speech

[@Bald_Fred]

Holy shit! It's a fellow blindy

[@Bald_Fred]

​@@Nerfhoopsdbdp touch typing if on computer with screen readers to read or screen reader on phone to read and type.

[@johnnessuno6515]

"ginger kids" Ad-When your child is diagnosed with pediatric cancer- skip "Ah sick!"

[@undeadprincess5726]

Hearing the disney lawsuit just instantly made me think of an episode of bojack horseman where the billionare Jeremiah whitewhale kills someone in his factory and is able to get away with it because the law allowed it.

[@Celeste-jh2lj]

I remember that episode. Depressing how close to reality it is

[@lucasvincent3021]

“It’s said their heart grew 3 sizes too big that day” sorry to tell you blooms but Disney doesn’t have a heart. They’re a greedy corporation juggernaut. 3 times 0 is still 0

[@emeraldfinder5]

Blooms was clearly being sarcastic when he said that

[@elduquecaradura1468]

@@emeraldfinder5 yes, Disney just backpedaled because they realized the backlash caused by this scandal would be even harder than the Buzz Lightyear's lesbian kiss Sadly people took this too well and didn't punished Disney for this, however so many evil things can be done so far before the people decided to leave nonetheless

[@grendel3701]

I remember getting kicked out of a verizon 10 or more years ago because I wanted to read the entire contract and they said I was taking too long. Like it's not my fault you made it 300 pages and I'm dyslexic.

[@draphking]

The scary thing about modern Disney isn't that they will eventually own everything its that they can pull stuff like this without a second thought. Normally a corporation wouldn't do something like this because its cartoonishly evil, makes them look cartoonishly evil and would affect their brand image. But the mere fact they went ahead with this and let media outlets cover shows that they are so wealthy and powerful they were sure it wouldn't affect them financially. That is scary.

[@777idkineedausername]

They didn't think it would get this much coverage, or that people could spin the story as far as they did. They don't have confidence no one can touch them, or they would not have contracted their statement. Stop mongering fear and think with a calm head.

[@aw2584]

​@@777idkineedausername 21 comments on this channel, all about this lawsuit and how cool Disney actually is - you're not helping Disney with the notion that they use bots and full time trolls for their PR...

[@Sercil00]

I wonder how the decision making process at Disney works. Disney is bound to have an army of lawyers with dozens if not hundreds of open lawsuits at any given time. Was this one overzealous or perhaps legit psychopathic lawyer thinking he had something there? Over how many tables does this go? How many looked at this and said "sounds good to me"?

[@JustLoro]

Y u dick riding a whole ass corporation?​@@777idkineedausername

[@Savajj_nahold]

Oh blimey, i live in a world where you, yes you, the guy that gets scared by a stupid legal (or maybe at this point it should be called illegal honestly, its quite fucked up) mumbo jumbo of a stupid rotting entertainment company with no soul left in it, exist! and here i thought my fear of rodents was pretty stupid, you take the cake my friend, congratulations! I don't know why am i surprised since this world is big enough to have people afraid of pretty much anything you can imagine but anyway, can't help but feel surprised and happy anyway

[@xananax21]

The funny thing is that I actually do read terms and conditions. To the point I have spent over an hour googling terms because I didn't understand entire passages. Mostly because I'm terrified of losing property rights or having to pay out because I did something I didn't know I agreed I wouldn't do.

[@oz_jones]

You can't own digital unless you have pirated it.

[@xananax21]

@@oz_jones GOG content is DRM free

[@swatkabombonica4103]

And still to press agree, because you can't use it the other way

[@trystonkincannon8320]

Same. I already F= Up with Google, I ain't gonna make that mistakes twice

[@TheAtqthe30th]

Reading a Windows TOS as a teenager was wild... It is very very broad and was concerning at the time. Made me question every TOS since then.

[@tylerherrod3454]

The fact that Disney tried that proves that they are extremely dangerous and should be dismantled. Take ALL of their intellectual properties and place them into the public domain.

[@LamiaLover]

its a textbook example as to why companies like this deserve to be broken up.

[@MrCmon113]

Lol, you're just as bad as them.

[@Blazecap]

Can't argue with that honestly but its too late I'm afraid

[@bootmii98]

They agreed not to sue you, take full advantage

[@aw2584]

Never gonna happen. Find any video or social media group with mostly Americans, and write a post stating corporations should pay a lot of taxes and if they avoid it they shouldn't be allowed to operate in the country, that there should be anti-corpo laws in place, or even laws against price dumping. People will dismiss it by calling you a commie socialist that needs to GTFO to Europe. And then complain about Disney or whatever. When EU introduced laws forcing Apple to use regular USB C ports, meaning everything has to use the same charger, meaning you will be able to charge every portable device with the same cable. One of the biggest reasons behind this was Apple introducing a new port every generation, forcing clients to buy THEIR cables everytime they break or buy new device, causing tons of waste in electronics etc. The entire world was celebrating this... besides Americans who called it communism. You get my point im sure lol.

[@lePirateMan]

I once read the ToS of my bank. The amount spelling mistakes were baffling. There were only 7 out of 37 pages where I didn't find multiple mistakes.

[@mr.waffles8739]

I don't really find this episode that gross, you just hear farting noises and see a head shake, personally I find it more gross when they show the interior of a rectum

[@spieleohnesound8549]

same

[@vincenzobonadonna4556]

🎶Lemmiwinks lemmiwinks lemmiwinks 🎶

[@kirb727]

I think it’s the thought of someone eating shit, I can feel them being exhausted of any wrong movements, it feels awful knowing the can’t really breathe well, but I agree definitely not their grossest 😭

[@fisher3317]

Especially when Paris Hilton goes up that rectum.

[@comedyman2817]

I feel like Disney being able to kill you because you agreed to some random terms of service years ago is the grosser part

[@cravonomire9971]

"While art mirrors reality, sometimes reality mirrors art." - some guy

[@doginhat13]

Probably one of my favorite jokes of the series

[@fooff1]

Mirrors mirror reality AND art. GG some guy.

[@AFeralTrout420]

Based quote

[@Gaarakunpro]

Their executive producer ending the call saying "Thanks Happy Easter to you too." Freaking kills me. 😂

[@oz_jones]

It killed her too.

[@MrRiddler6]

The funny thing about the behind the scenes special on this episode is that they were going to put Lady Gaga in the episode as one of the people who didn't read the terms and conditions. but with her being she volunteered in the operation. but was change during the episode making process.

[@jackofastora8962]

almost certain putting "You cant sue us for any reason" in terms in service is literally illegal. You cant put absurd or unethical things into terms in service such as "We can harvest your organs whenever we want" because clicking "accept" doesnt automatically negate the actual law. they withdrew because they realized theyd get absolutely legally slammed if they pressed it

[@777idkineedausername]

It may have healed up in Cort, but it became a PR nightmare. Of course we'll never know.

[@CalamityM]

@@777idkineedausername "healed up in Cort" are you a bot or just mentally impaired?

[@harrisonofcolorado8886]

13:53 The fact that Trey can't keep it together really shows how much Matt and Trey love to make this show. I'm happy that a documentary of how Matt and Trey make South Park episodes when this episode was made.

[@I.____.....__...__]

I'm surprised them doing a stereotypical Japanese accent isn't considered offensive and get them cancelled in this day and age where you're not allowed to do fake accents anymore and people get militant about studios not casting people that actually match the characters for real. 🙄 Oh, so they cast Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom instead of an actual Romani actor? How awful! Why didn't they cast a real Latverian? Or a real Wakandan instead of Chadwick‽

[@CatLeone2003]

​@I.____.....__...__ Lol, yup. If you look more into RDJ's background though, he's actually a perfect fit.

[@CaptainCat101]

The ITunes Terms and Conditions already have crazy stuff (you're not allowed to use the devices to make weapons, for one), a Humancentipad is not completely out of question

[@gamerule18]

Wait you aren't? Uh oh

[@Octav2000]

There go my plans for the weekend

[@gremlininthesystem]

>implying someone tried to make a weapon out of their old iphone

[@gremlininthesystem]

how would you even make that using their devices? would you just like, burst the battery

[@gingy30]

Woops 😬

[@RelativelyBest]

Fun fact: Steam's original TOS had the same clause as Disney's, that is to say all legal claims had to be settled via arbitration. However, it also specified that Steam would cover the fees for said arbitration. A law firm eventually realized that this meant they could just have a huge number of users apply for arbitration en mass and have Steam pay for all of them, which would have been extremely expensive for Steam regardless of the verdict. So Steam did a 180 and made it so that arbitration no longer was an option at all. In other words, they only changed their TOS because it became inconvenient to _them._

[@hmlandis1370]

"HumancentiPad" was way less gross than "Britney's New Look" in my honest opinion.

[@LordHollow]

Agreed. THAT one I won't watch again.

[@IanICee]

I even think the Streaming Wars stuff is worse

[@hmlandis1370]

@@LordHollow Yeah, it's horrible. They made that one of the least enjoyable episodes in the show's history. Like I get the point, but Jesus fuck.

[@LordHollow]

@@hmlandis1370 Its like they just threw humor out the window on that one.

[@hmlandis1370]

@@LordHollow I tolerated that episode better when I was younger, now I avoid it like the fucking plague.

[@Official_RetroMania]

You agreed to our terms and service? Well, then you can't sue us, we can do whatever we want with your body, have fun.

[@kathrineici9811]

It’s an adhesion contract, good luck actually enforcing it

[@Sercil00]

[insert Micky Mouse Ha-Ha! laugh]

[@novastar6112]

@@kathrineici9811 a billion dollars to the judge can absolutely "enforce" it

[@whitewall2253]

​@@novastar6112 only in America.

[@leka2095]

​@@whitewall2253 oh, you sweet summer child...

[@FartingSpider12]

The Disney lawsuit legitimately makes me sicker to my stomach than the South Park episode does; several times over. Could you imagine if an individual tried to get away with a claim like the one Disney tried to make? "Yeah, I killed that person but 4 years ago somebody signed a contract that said it was ok". In the case of a single individual they would be in prison for life, but because Disney is a big corporation with a lot of money they almost got away with it. Not saying I know a better way to run a country, but capitalism really does make me sick sometimes.

[@jwill540]

Thats not capitalism its garbage judges.

[@menacingdonutz]

The root of the problem is selfishness, we can build all kinds of barriers to obstruct selfish choices but human minds are excellent problem solvers and someone will always find a way. It’s why a common saying about communism is that it is excellent on paper but not in practice. On paper you can exclude the human element, but as soon as you try to make it reality our flaws seep in and find the cracks in the plan and exploit them. And sure you can go back in and make changes to fix mistakes but someone will find a new one.

[@juliangandara9552]

And that's not all. They got various kindergartens shut down, sued a school for playing The Lion King remake, and threanten to sue a construction worker if he put Winnie the Pooh in a kid's tombstone

[@Villain_Killin_Dylan]

Might over Right. It's that way in nature, society and, if applicable, the afterlife

[@MrCmon113]

Wtf does that have to do with capitalism?

[@True_EmperorSB]

Btw, I don't like reading so what I do is I copy and paste that same terms and conditions and ask CHATGPT to look for anything that can be dangerous or cause casualties

[@velocityraptor2890]

interesting! how's that worked out for ya?

[@True_EmperorSB]

@@velocityraptor2890 Yeah it works and quite Effectively if I must say so myself, But ofc I don't fully rely on CHATGPT so sometimes I might read it quickly to double check, especially if I'm about to use a new App that not many people use yet

[@jayayche9681]

Did you ask ChatGPT about ChatGPT's ToS?

[@BusterKeaton48]

I appreciate that your titles aren't just clickbait, they are generally the thesis of the video essay. Keep it up king

[@nanopanda]

Watching two grown man make a fuck ton of money off their poop jokes like god intended

[@shelbyduncan9940]

body horror is so underrated as a subgenre literally nothing is scarier

[@JustAPasserby-e6z]

The most infuriating part is for many products like games (and relevantly Metal Gear Survive does have an insane stipulation thrown into their EULA) you're only shown the terms and given the option to decline locking you out AFTER you've already paid for it.

[@RoshDroz]

The human centipede was incredibly pervasive in culture when it came out in 2009. I'd imagine 99% of everyone in America heard of it then, unless they were under the age of like 10

[@ThatGuyGloomy]

I was 5 and i remember my older cousins talking about it lmao

[@NeonBeeCat]

I was 5 and I assumed it was like 50 years old because of how often I Heard about it. It was in the part of my mind of stuff like Frankenstein and Dracula

[@nicjoy4407]

I definitely think you overestimate its popularity, considering only 97% of Americans recognize Mickey Mouse (this is higher than Santa Claus). My guess is probably somewhere in the 60-80% range.

[@capperbuns]

I was 5 too, heard about it somehow.

[@johnnoreau3570]

I was barely over 10 maybe 12 or so and remember hearing about this

[@thumpyloudfoot864]

0:14 I had surgery on my sinuses, and they leave gauze in there that usually liquidifies then is expelled during sinus flushings... However sometimes they don't dissolve and you hack it up like a loogie.... This happened to me.... And I swear to God I coughed up a cheeto sized piece of gauze that was dark reddish brown... and my mind went INSTANTLY to this exact episode (Red Hot Catholic Love and in particular the moment when Randy first finds out you can poop out your mouth).... So I can honestly say this cartoon has warped my fragile little brain...

[@sockman42]

oh my god you poor soul

[@thumpyloudfoot864]

@@sockman42 meh.....

[@istoleyoureyeliner10]

Hey!! Me too, Sorta lol (I had a cyst on my pituitary gland, but they went though my nose) and the healing was crazy crazy, like multiple doctors had said that series of events should have never happened 🤣 but I hope your healing goes smoothly and easily!

[@Silvercanth]

Aww, poor buddy. Reminds me of when my brother had a tracheotomy for a year and I took care of him. Cleaning the cannula and throat hole was crazy sometimes. Had to be thorough too, literally sterile. Sorry for the rant. I trust your sinuses are better now though? :)

[@ArquaticDreamer1994]

OKAY on second thought maybe i wont eat this cup of jello i have sitting on the table right next to me anymore. *shivers with disgust*

[@LordHollow]

I watch Centipad constantly. It's too funny. The Asian guy shouting "I bereave in yoouuu!!!" To Kyle cracks me up every time. Also, Butters reading the terms and conditions out loud. "Vanilla Paste! Vanilla Paste!"

[@Chuckf66]

"cuttle fish & asparagus?"

[@loganmaddocks4703]

@@LordHollow you mean it charges my battery AND craps in Kyles mouth?

[@LordHollow]

@@loganmaddocks4703 *Cryin!*

[@Blazecap]

The behind the scenes of that recoding is just as funny as the clip itself you can tell matt and trey love their work

[@latetotheparty7551]

And Kyle's muffled screams. Plus Cartman having a temporary win then having it stripped away from him yet again.

[@lukeholiday]

0:42 excuse me

[@vrtex17]

More recently Uber did similar thing. An Uber driver good into an accident and the people that got injured can't sue the company because their daughter used their food delivery service or something. Also I find the fact that South Park creators use apple computers (as shown in that documentary) hysterical.

[@777idkineedausername]

Why not just sue the driver, it all depends on circumstances, but I would need further information to consider Uber to be liable.

[@Rubythecube]

I gotta say, I've been having audio processing issues my whole life and your voice is comfortable to listen to. Not too loud, not too rough, smooth and nice at a good pitch. Usually im overstimulated by people's voices, but not yours for some reason. I like it.

[@sierralovat5498]

He doesn't use unspeakable, vocal fry and has adequate use of a pop filter. Its great 👍

[@Sercil00]

Ironically, this is cartoonish Disney-Villain levels of evil.

[@mimszanadunstedt441]

Evil hides behind a bright light so you cannot see them, and casting shadows all around to worry about instead.

[@Where_is_Waldo]

22:02 _"Oh, shit. It's in the media... yeah, this one's gonna cost us more if we don't just pay them."_ -shitbags who tried to get out of paying what, to them, is pocket change because negligence within their company killed someone

[@theskyisteal8346]

As someone who has loved South Park from a distance for a long time, it is shocking to me that one of Cartman's most iconic scenes is from an episode fans habitually skip. Almost as shocking as the fact that people aren't familiar with The Human Centipede?!? I mean that's tip of the iceberg of disturbing films. Like, I wouldn't expect people to know A Serbian Film or even Salo but I thought Human Centipede was a cultural touchstone especially for the kind of people who watch South Park. I have yet to have the pleasure of actually watching any Human Centipede films but the second I heard Blooms say "the Human Cent-iPad" I knew what we were in for and this episode sounds like it would be one of my favourites, if I actually get around to watching the show all the way through (Still on Big Al's Big Gay Boat Ride from S1 on my first sequential viewing)

[@jaredput]

Absolutely unacceptable!! This episode was a classic!

[@ananyabailey1057]

I'm not sure if the movie was really that well-known Internationally. I'm from Germany and the first time I ever heard of it was in a Family Guy joke some years ago. But I would never have watched it anyway, in general wouldn't watch gore or fetish movies. I like the South Park episode but it's a totally different thing when it's only in a 2D cartoon and meant as a joke.

[@ShadowPredator31]

Outside a kitchen I worked in me and a buddy were scream-paraphrasing/quoting Cartman's "fucked me" rant and traumatized a poor foreign girl that was working in the restaurant next door

[@EthanDoezYT]

It's kinda crazy and sad how Disney went from a beloved creator to now the name of a company that only knows money, marketing, and being greedy as fuck.

[@mitab1]

The problem with tos is that they’re written in the most boring convoluted way possible, they’re genuinely hard to read because they use legal language that most people don’t understand

[@theinfinitecomet4753]

I swear it’s literally always Disney or Logan Paul doing some morally despicable act tying into South Park.

[@bac0nhawkmaster]

I wouldn’t call the human centipede a cult ‘classic’, but it’s adjacent to the genre at least, if someone considers themselves a movie buff but hasn’t at least HEARD of it then they aren’t as well rounded as they should be

[@ContentEnjoyer-gm3ky]

I only learned about it whilst going through a list of banned movies.

[@ald7282]

the concept lives in infamy, but i'm unsure how many people have actually watched the movie, much less the sequels, keeping it from the "cult classic" level.

[@Sun-nn]

The human centipede is very mainstream, that’s why there’s literally a South Park parody of it lol

[@sunshine3914]

I gave up on movies in the late 80s, never had cable, & haven’t had a tv in nearly 15 years, but somehow I’ve been aware of that movie for years. Seems like I heard a comedian talking about it.

[@Drixenol86]

Even a horror fan like myself hated it. I find it insulting to put it up there with other cult classics like Attack of the Killer Tomatoes and The Toxic Avenger.

[@cylasbreakdown6140]

I tend to try and at least skim the T&C. Like, “this section’s about how they use my data, this bit’s about proper use of the service…” and if there’s something that catches my eye I slow down and try to understand. I don’t always do this, but I try to.

[@cheesedemon88]

I do the same for sites and apps that I've used to showcase art and photos, because I want to have control over the copy and distribution rights of my work. I once did it in front of my family while signing up for Snapchat, they thought it was the most amusing thing ever. I've never read the terms for a streaming service though.

[@SupHapCak]

We shouldn't have to you know? What's in terms and conditions that isn't covered over normal copyright law? Or copyright law should be extended that it isn't on the user to accept something shady.

[@cheesedemon88]

@@SupHapCak we shouldn’t have to, but here we are.

[@lazarus8018]

Unless I need it for school, I tend to do the same thing. I can't really think of too many good reasons for a streaming service or video game having a TOS.

[@Gandhi_Physique]

I try to, but virtually never do. Though, it is awesome when I run across one that is like 5 or less pages.

[@Tyro_]

Never thought of it but human centipede is actually a perfect metaphor for the modern approach to information dissemination

[@Garlic_Doggo]

15:30 the fact that they had apple equipment in the office (idk if coincidence or not) makes the behind the scenes for this episode be all the more funnier

[@Disturdy]

Dear god Humancentipad is real

[@theesotericvoice3864]

Um, no. Legal indemnity from something that could (and in this case, did) happen is very different to permission to do something egregious.

[@ArquaticDreamer1994]

I’m not finished with the video yet but please for the love of all that is good please for gods sake dont tell me this is real. I will fucking scream

[@Cold_Cactus]

​@@ArquaticDreamer1994 yeah its pretty much real , not the centipad but the mechanisms for it to happen 100% exist and according to nj supreme court those tos contracts are binding

[@Cold_Cactus]

​@@theesotericvoice3864 its one step away , now that "you agreed to it" has been cartirized in court its only a matter of time before " if you miss a payment you become labor of the company till debt is repayed" is in the tos and they will use the same "you agreed" claus thats just been legitimized by the Supreme court You can act like its not that big of a deal but you cant call people who are actually worried about it "fear mongers"

[@lens_hunter]

21:20 Steam continuing to catch constant Ws. Praise Gaben!

[@BoxShuichi-dm5mo]

This is why i always read the terms and conditions... Legend has it, Kyle still read the Terms and Conditions 15 times before calling Stan to see it it was okay with him.

[@darthkeyrus5448]

That Steam Terms of Service change is a lot less awesome than you might think. There are currently 2 law firms engaging in mass arbitration for a combined total of about 100k Steam users as a way around the previous line forbiding class action lawsuits. Another line in the newly updated terms states that not agreeing to the change will result in a total loss of one's Steam account and all purchases held within, meaning the 100k people not-suing Valve have to choose between dropping their arbitrated dispute or losing their Steam purchases. This gets a lot worse with another set of lines in the old and new terms regarding legal fees. In the old agreement, Valve will always cover 100% of arbitration fees regardless of the outcome of the case, so long as the cost is below $10k, which an individual case will always be. The new agreement has no such provision for legal costs in lawsuits, which means a user suing Valve and losing has to pay all legal fees out of pocket. So the real reason for this change is to force these 100k Steam users to drop their arbitration claims or lose all Steam purchases AND risk thousands of dollars in legal fees for continuing their cases in court. It is a very shitty thing Valve is doing to get out of their current not-class action suit.

[@JamesTDG]

I am actually one of the many users on a case and can confirm, THANKFULLY my lawyer states that it was technically signed under duress (I use Steam in order to access the tools I use in order to do my freelance work), therefore the agreement could be thrown out of the window, but it does make me fear that my steam account could be terminated because of this.

[@fomori2]

"There are currently 2 law firms engaging in mass arbitration for a combined total of about 100k Steam users as a way around the previous line forbiding class action lawsuits."-- Forbidding class action lawsuits can be a good thing because then each person is required to sue individually. It usually is to the benefit of the COMPANY, not the plaintiffs, if people classify as the company only has to spend money on a single lawsuit. Lawyers push class action lawsuits because it targets lazy and poor people, which tend to be the most likely victims of consumer fraud. The biggest winners are the legal team as they get 50% of a settlement, while the other 50% is split evenly among everyone in the class, which usually comes to a pittance. Secondly, if you already are engaged in legal actions under the old terms, new terms cannot invalidate those actions, even if you accept them.

[@AlexsGoogleAccount]

@@fomori2 "Secondly, if you already are engaged in legal actions under the old terms, new terms cannot invalidate those actions, even if you accept them." Thank you, this seemed obvious to me.

[@tiseril]

22:08 They've heard Johnny Silverhand's theme playing quietly in the background and decided not to risk it

[@CumMomentGamer]

they heard Better Call Saul intro theme

[@Vampire_Stawberry]

I only know of human centipede from the song ‘Red Flags’ by Tom Cardy

[@wayneigoe6722]

Truth be told, its not a really bad movie. Like it has some gross moments, but it is astronomically slow-paced, way too much talking to be "horror", and it just isn't all that scary. Even the grossest moments are just bleh at worst. Like if you can tolerate a saw movie or the excorsist, you'll be fine

[@catbatrat1760]

Same! :D

[@ald7282]

the second and third ones get SUPER meta, it's kinda great if you can stomach it.

[@0oneverfearo0]

@@wayneigoe6722 the first one is kinda boring/tame, I agree but try the second one. I cringe just thinking about it. My uncle loves splatter and always when we visited him he would turn on the second movie, because he thought it was funny 'til I had to scream at him to finally stop that awful movie. And I wouldn't call it horror and more like torture pron

[@wayneigoe6722]

@@0oneverfearo0 oh yeah, the second one is straight nightmare fuel. Like some serious NC-17 level shit.. but the first one is just a lot of talking and is really slow, so by the time something DOES happen, your brain has already tuned out for the most part.

[@nategore3724]

14:23 You totally could've had snuck in a joke here "From day one, it's just been two dudes whose number one priority is to make jokes about number two"

[@mee091000]

I'll never understand how Kyle made it out of Humancentipad with his sanity intact.

[@Warmaka]

"He's a Jew, they do not have sanity to begin with." -Cartman probably

[@MiniatureW]

Bring up Logan Paul is just ironic lol, because Jake Paul used to be a Disney star with Logan appeared in one episode of his show, spineless people attracted to spineless people, who would've thought.

[@GiverOfFlammenwerfers]

If you ever feel like a POS, remember you aren't a huge corporation.

[@ginak5802]

Idk how Anne made those phone calls without losing it. Her: "No, there's not any visible feces, as of now.." The disgusted Standards and Practices people "..... I guess that's okay. Wtf is wrong with you guys?" Her: "Happy Easter!"

[@squiiidxcx]

Btw the woman who died at Disney, their family was only given $50,000

[@ovrlk811]

That’s not even enough for the wrong doing of those bastards. A life was lost, a wife, a sister, a daughter, a cousin. It’s truly horrifying.

[@TeamPerfectNaruto]

@@ovrlk811 $50,000 That would barely cover funeral costs, Disney needs to get SUED hard

[@I.____.....__...__]

WRONG! The reporting on this was utter TRASH! 🤦 First of all, the case isn't over, it hasn't even started. Second, he was NOT suing for only $50,000, that's just a threshold number for categorizing lawsuits, just a line to determine where and how the suit should proceed, depending on if it's over or under $50k. It's like how suits under $5k go to small-claims court instead of a jury-trial. Or, vandalism becomes a felony if it does over $5k in damages and can results in prison terms of up to 10 years, versus six months if less than $5k. He was obviously suing for a LOT more. 😒

[@squiiidxcx]

@@I.____.....__...__ OKAY?? 🤪🤪

[@Glitcheey]

​​@squiiidxcx implying he's crazy even though he's right and you're spreading misinformation lmfao

[@antipoti]

It was an amazing episode. The japanese guy trying to be cosiderate but still putting the other through hell is really funny. B plots are also memorably great. Legendary episode!

[@darthzuul3155]

3:28 Hey, I am watching on my lunch break!

[@tttjj111]

I'm eating dinner

[@emarskineel]

Cuttlefish and asparagus or vanilla paste?

[@toucan6109]

Wut u earin

[@jimmyjaneson6510]

High school lunch

[@ragnarok7976]

The one thing people also forget about apple TOS is that the first opportunity to read it is after you've bought the $1000+ device and disagreeing means your device is now a paper weight.

[@tommystrickland6268]

Are there really people who don't know what human centipede is?

[@Horopter]

I envy their existence Tommy.

[@tommystrickland6268]

@@Horopter lol 😆

[@Dragonnotfound_]

​@@HoropterSame Horo

[@sarge5431]

People who live peacefully

[@Aroaceenby]

I saw this episode before I watched the movie or knew it existed and i just saw it as funny made up stuff. I did wonder how they came up with such craziness.

[@milliewoo337]

15:23 “thanks Happy Easter to you too.” Ahhahahaha 😂

[@jakk1559]

Anything like that in the TOS would be tossed out in court as it's widely accepted that no one read the 24 pages of legal speak for everything they own if it's outlandish it's tossed out

[@zacharynelson2856]

See the problem with that, is that it relies on legal precedent, and courts being responsible and consistent. The courts could always just change their mind like they have frequently recently. Sure they aren't going to do something like the centipad obviously but they could definitely start baby stepping in that direction, making it easier for companies to seize your rights.

[@jakk1559]

@@zacharynelson2856 it's already been set in previous cases could always get appealed to higher courts later but last I saw that's where it's at currently

[@777idkineedausername]

​@@zacharynelson2856 You mean give companies rights

[@kosipisakii]

⁠@@zacharynelson2856in EU we don’t have precedent based laws and anything illegal in terms of service (or any other kind of contract) simply doesn’t apply

[@JamesTDG]

@@zacharynelson2856 Seriously, if they let this happen, it is going to end up causing people to stop taking the legal path just to get what they are rightfully owed. "Oh, I have no rights? Well then you have no HQ anymore!" is probably going to be a common phrase as people spark the gas.

[@stoneage8236]

5:00 for video to actually start

[@vitorcustodio5899]

I had no idea Human Centipad was that disliked and mentioned as "umwatchable" It's one of my absolute favorites and so stupidly funny. Plus the character are just bobbing their heads, not like it shows anything visceral (which they do all the time in other episodes).

[@jaredput]

😂 it was awesome!

[@jacobrosen]

The thing that annoyed me with that southpark episode was that they took three people who couldn't read and then tried to make something that could read. The premise is flawed!

[@KoffeeB]

Disney didn't allow spiderman on a kids grave spider being his favorite thing in the world, remember that?

[@Chancho-x1f]

Remember when Disney threaten to sue a day care in Florida for using Disney characters?

[@cornflakeshumunculus8373]

I just love how the south park staff are enjoying making the episodes. Goes to show how much love has been put in this series.

[@Kinosa-u1w]

Local thief breaks into a South Park KZbinr, replaces his PC with a Mac and leaves without stealing anything

[@lydiajoe8955]

As soon as I read the title and saw the thumbnail image, I thought “oh God no.”

[@BLUERAYGUNER]

disney making that statement about "humanity" is just them realizing that their sneaky tactics were about to lose them EVERY SUBSCRIBER they ever had and ever could have... dont fall for it, they dont really care. abandon disney

[@leandrokynortas9473]

"People didn't enjoy this because they didn't know what it was parodying" No. People did. They still hated it. Their enjoyment did NOT increase just because they knew what it was. It was less gross than the movies themselves, sure, but it was still really bad.

[@eelmail]

To even sign up for a Casa Bonita reservation, which remember Matt and Trey own the restaurant now, you have to agree to their terms and conditions. And those terms and conditions do include the same exact arbitration clause, not just for Casa Bonita, but also anything South Park related current past or future. Calling Disney uniquely bad and praising South Park for this specific issue is pretty biased. Just want to put that out there.

[@phillipA123]

Tbf it's how this arbitration clause was snuck into a free trial for Disney plus. Nothing to do with the park, the restaurant, etc. It's so absurd that everyone freaked out over it....but yeah they could have snuck that into purchasing the ticket and I bet people would agree just the same.

[@yukiutaware1064]

... you understand someone died right?

[@captaincairoPT]

The difference is that.. ehm... someone died! And it's not the first time Disney was involved in a death caused by negligence. AFAIK Casa Bonita and SP haven't led to anyone's death.

[@localsurgeon4020]

@@captaincairoPTKenny would disagree

[@captaincairoPT]

@@localsurgeon4020 touché my friend

[@just_passing_through]

I’ve never seen The Human Centipede, but I had heard of it, and knew the basic premise. I got what they were parodying, so I found this episode hilarious. Maybe I’m weird?

[@latetotheparty7551]

Nope. My experience is anecdotal but everyone I knew had seen the movie, hated it, so loved the South Park parody. Plus back then Apple's reputation was still not the best for non Apple users so them getting roasted was a bonus. Could be a generational/regional thing though. XD

[@nowistime8070]

why does that make you weird?

[@just_passing_through]

@@nowistime8070 Apparently everyone else finds it gross, and I found it hilarious.

[@Cobbido]

@@just_passing_through Nobody knows what the hell you're talking about!

[@Gandhi_Physique]

@@Cobbido It is pretty clear what they are talking about. What isn't clear?

[@scarebear1265]

As gross as this episode is, the footage of Matt and Trey recording their lines for it will never not make me laugh😂

[@VinnyMcGuire-vo4sf]

I remember when I was a kid this came out I never watched it but my friends told me about it South Park and family guy have taught me 90 percent of my media knowledge