Blue Origin Cancelled New Glenn's First Launch... Here Is The Reason!

Blue Origin has long been the company known for its delays. Whenever they announced a rocket launch, it became almost a running joke that it would be delayed. This reputation is even more pronounced when it comes to their highly anticipated New Glenn rocket. Despite this history, Blue Origin was recently given another chance to prove they could finally deliver on their promises. They announced a new launch date for New Glenn, and this time, they managed to convince even the most skeptical observers. People believed them, especially when they began the countdown, signaling they were serious.
But, in true Blue Origin fashion, they delayed it yet again. And it wasn’t just a matter of a day or two-it was a significant delay. This incident is likely to further erode the already fragile trust people have in Blue Origin’s ability to deliver on its promises. The consequences of this could be severe, not just for their reputation but also for their position in the competitive space industry. In this video, we’ll dive into what happened, the potential fallout, and what it means for the future of Blue Origin.
Before we delve any deeper, make sure to subscribe to our channel for future updates about the space industry and the developments surrounding Blue Origin and New Glenn.
New Glenn’s journey from concept to its maiden flight has been anything but smooth, marked by repeated delays and technical hurdles that have tested the patience of stakeholders and space enthusiasts alike. The most recent setback came in January 2025, when New Glenn's launch, initially slated for January 8, faced a series of postponements due to unfavorable weather conditions and a subsequent technical issue that further delayed its much-anticipated debut.
The first indication of trouble came as adverse weather conditions in the Atlantic Ocean prevented the safe recovery of the rocket's first-stage booster. Blue Origin’s reusable booster technology requires a controlled landing at sea, and high seas posed a significant risk to the recovery process. The company announced a delay from January 8 to January 10, hoping for improved conditions. Unfortunately, the weather refused to cooperate, forcing yet another delay to January 12. While disappointing, such weather-related delays are not uncommon in the aerospace industry, where precision and safety are paramount. However, the situation took a more serious turn on January 12, when a technical anomaly within the rocket's subsystems was detected during the final countdown. This unforeseen issue resulted in the cancellation of the launch attempt altogether, with Blue Origin stating that resolving the problem would require more time than the launch window allowed. A new target date for the mission has yet to be announced, leaving the fate of the rocket's debut uncertain.

[@Major.Tom.1973]

For something to be re-usable, it first has to be usable 🤭

[@jimfoard5671]

Stop. You're making too much sense. Since when does logic have anything to do with this discussion?

[@jamesp13152]

Well, it is re-usable technically. They can recycle a lot of the materials that went into it. Trash...

[@autogyro333]

Nice, like to finish first, first.........

[@paulbarnes2499]

it is reusable they just keep reusing the same vehicle to stand up, fill up , scrub, empty ,stand down , ready for the next time rinse and repeat

[@wazhushkmuskrat9907]

Best one yet !!!! 😂😂😂😂

[@stevej7139]

I'm glad I gave up after the 4th 20 minute delay last night, had a feeling it wasn't going to launch at that point.

[@Mike-yt4jq]

I stopped watching after the second delay. I was unaware that there was a reputation for delays, it just looked like it wasn't going anywhere and it was late. lol

[@Shivaho]

I thought I was hallucinating that every time I checked in the Count Down kept going backwards instead of forward!

[@badtrekee4348]

What a waste of time bro. BO is worthless

[@PyroRob69]

I only kept watching, hoping for a RUD

[@semlohde1]

Isn't that the darn truth. I suspected so much, but don't want a total flop. I just have no real faith in Blue. Go on suborbital joy rides and get called astronauts- hype. Maybe this will work, but his launch was trying last night.

[@antonnym214]

Say it with me: Whenever there is a problem. It's a valve. It is ALWAYS a valve.

[@ServiceProcess]

I'm upset. I'm in the uk. Got up at 5.30 in the morning for a 6.00am launch ... kept delaying until 8am and then they cancelled it. I want the best for this company, but ... I should have known having had a decade to finish this rocket they are still not finished, pathetic. Disappointing.

[@elfietube]

Don't waste you time with Bozo, he is not worth it and never was. All talk, no substance.

[@elfietube]

Don't waste you time with Bozo, he is not worth it and never was. All talk, no substance.

[@deveusdude]

I stayed up to 3 am before I gave up (window started at 1am)

[@pattoft6356]

New Glen is competing with Falcon Heavy not starship

[@Fatpumpumlovah2]

Both rainbow!! Both!! Bezos still cant get it up even with its blue c0ckring lolololol

[@jackf.7415]

Competing in the same market segment as Sx FH may not be the market BO is targeting. While BONG will certainly exceed the capability of a FH doesn’t mean there is strong viable market or high demand for a BONG class launch vehicle. Sx has flown FH only 6 times since its inaugural test flight. On the other hand, as of January 2025, the F9 has been successfully launched 433 times. The Sx F9 class vehicle market is what BO should have set their sights if they wanted to compete with Sx FH.

[@vpjiohioo]

By just copy pasting and still not successful?

[@Shob81]

Not really. Blue Glenn has the largest fairings in the industry. That means they can carry and launch really large satellite. Neither FH or Starship can do that. FH has much smaller fairings and Starship doesn"t really have one. That means Spacex can launch larger amount of smaller satellites but BO can launch one really big one.

[@jackf.7415]

@@vpjiohioo I verified the Sx F9 and FH launch numbers on a search engine for accuracy. The rest of my commentary is my own opinion which is based on my experience of having worked in the space launch industry for a significant portion of my working career. So, what is specifically in my comment that you disagree with?

[@dionysus2006]

What rocket launches are you referring to? They haven't had any. New Shepard doesn't count, it is an amusement park ride.

[@jeromejooste3493]

Remember the Challenger disaster in 1986? Do you? Rather delay a launch than have another event like that. This may be unmanned but the there is not much to learn from shrapnel and burned wreckage but much to be learned from a safe and completed mission. Delaying is the better option all round. How many times has SpaceX delayed their launches?

[@thomaswakefield6889]

That's funny because SpaceX has learned a lot from its failed flights. As for the Challenger disaster, that was all on NASA's leadership. They knew about the faulty O-rings and refused to replace them. Then you had the Colombia disaster, and again, that was a NASA leadership problem as they also knew about the faulty heat tiles that fell off during reentry that caused the shuttle to blow up.

[@wernerluis]

It's quite embarrassing that B.Origin makes so many publications and propaganda without even having entered orbit.

[@Ronolein]

Die Vermutung steht im Raum das er nur Geld einsammeln will.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

This video is propaganda.

[@Ronolein]

@ Du meinst er ist doch gestartet und Niemand hat es bemerkt? ;-)

[@danielnogrady9004]

Jeff really needs to change his look. He definitely looks like a mad Scientist.

[@mobilemechanics6565]

Lex luther

[@antonnym214]

He should paint his fairing to match his head.

[@paulbarnes2499]

@@antonnym214 or his head to match the fairing scientist he is not.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

Looked like bad AI.

[@Philc231]

Just turn the blue organ factory into an Amazon distribution center .

[@eamonia]

Watch, they're _finally_ gonna launch the thing and it's not even gonna clear the pad. 😆

[@mattmorris9367]

I don't understand how a rocket company makes money, but doesn't launch rockets.

[@juliusolaolu7969]

actually, am thinking about that also

[@Bawbag0110]

He mentions down payments for future missions

[@thomaswakefield6889]

It's called embezzling money

[@schrodingersjet1043]

Why was the problem "unforeseen"? Don't they do any testing? A "technical anomaly"? Don't they do any analysis for potential problems? OK sure, you expect a component to work and then it suddenly breaks, fine, but what are wet and hot-fire rehearsals for? Seems like they've had plenty of time to prepare.

[@CVA34WestPac]

You are 100% correct. The Wet Dress rehearsal should have caught any problems.

[@accessguy4143]

@@CVA34WestPac What, problems can't develop between wet dress rehearsal and actual launch?

[@WC3POchannel10A]

Launch day issues have happened for the entire history of the Space Program!

[@WC3POchannel10A]

@@accessguy4143 Spacecraft are incredibly complex systems. You just never know. This is how it always has been in the Space Program. Scrubs should not be seen as failures, but as yet another point in the process.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

@@CVA34WestPac Not really, spacecraft are very complex systems. Many factors have to mesh together. It may have worked in your sims and tests on the pad. So, some variable went awry on a launch day. You scrub and go back and fix anomalies then come back again. Spaceflight is not for the impatient.

[@donaldsmith283]

God bless spacex...❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@lesterpeters1504]

the government should be very careful in awarding defense contracts to this company.

[@jerrymay3187]

They need to give blue origin a little blue pill! Maybe then they could get it up! 😮

[@DaveBigDawg]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@MarkKlimaszewski]

I sat thru many hours of New Glenn's delayed launches on Jan 12th. The whole team looked like a pack of DEI hires that were just to 'chicken shit' to say go!

[@meditationsoundscapes5203]

fortune favors the brave

[@RasLion]

Blue Origin is a joke

[@WC3POchannel10A]

This video is a joke.

[@ramkumarrawat8984]

The tesla is the biggest joke in the universe

[@RasLion]

@@ramkumarrawat8984 Oh ok thx for confirming your opinion has got nothing to do with facts but politics...soy boy.

[@thomaswakefield6889]

​@@ramkumarrawat8984and yet Tesla has made Musk millions. How much have you made with your designed vehicle, or do you have anything that actually makes you money other than working for someone else and making them rich

[@karlmahlmann]

Space is hard, and BO has a reputation for underachieving. But all it takes is one successful flight and all will be forgiven.

[@Bitterrootbackroads]

I can tolerate a “hold” in a countdown when there is some level of transparency & communication about potential problems & efforts to resolve them. Endless extensions to launch times like I saw here looks more like hope & change is the ideology here. I’m not wasting sleep again, I’ll wait for replays.

[@davidcolwell614]

Blue origin initially had the contract to launch the year 2025, however, in late 2024 the government realize blue origin would only be able to launch 2025 by mid 2026. So they canceled the contract as that would cause confusion with the calendar.

[@Freshwaterboy]

First flight was supposed to be in 2016. Being so careful you let the competition, the market, and the world pass you by. Slow is their mantra and their downfall.

[@sus_0_6979]

You're acting like New Glenn is the only rocket that has delays, but its delays are nothing compared to almost every other rocket in the industry. You're just too used to SpaceX. Also, was Starship not supposed to bring people to the moon in 2023? It's been 2 years and they're still not even close.

[@Freshwaterboy]

@sus_0_6979 Who is closer to their goal? New Glenn will make an excellent tanker for refueling Starship.

[@sus_0_6979]

@@Freshwaterboy New Glenn's goal is to be a rocket that carries large payloads, Starship's goal is to go to Mars. Starship almost definitely has at least five years until it achieves that, while New Glenn could theoretically carry payloads like that to space right now. Besides, New Glenn could never be a tanker for Starship, because New Glenn's second stage is fueled by liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, while Starship's is fueled by liquid oxygen and liquid methane.

[@Freshwaterboy]

@sus_0_6979 Starship is a system, New Glenn is a rocket.

[@sus_0_6979]

@@Freshwaterboy I love SpaceX as much as the next guy, but when you talk about them, you should really know what you're actually talking about, you clearly don't.

[@Sirtomalot-c5s]

They couldn’t get the space helmet over Bezo’s head!

[@petersatarigames2821]

I like how the narrator, makes it out the New Glenn NG1 Launch was the only rocket that has a history of delays. Rocket Delays date back to the days when NASA was founded with the Mercury Rocket. These things need to send up expensive payloads and humans. Blue Origin can't just launch to see if they blow up or crash.

[@Ralph-f7n]

Bezos is a clown.

[@dennisweifenbach2647]

Just keep smilin' Bezos. You have not accomplished anything so far. Time you gave up and save some money.

[@GenKrug-bl8mq]

Space Trends as a reporting KZbin poster should be considered as an irrelevant source for anything. They may even be Chinese! 🤔🙄

[@josephknurek7795]

Enough room for two companies in this "space" Way too negative.

[@thomaswakefield6889]

The way BO is going right now, Sierra Space will have their plane in space before NG gets launched

[@TheOfficial007]

This is blue origins first flight. They haven't done it yet. We can't talk failure of the program until it fails to get it's payload into orbit. SpaceX only succeeded on its 4th falcon 1 to put a payload in orbit. Sure they are behind spacex in this market but they offer unique capabilities until the payload deployment on starship is ready. We need two horses in our team for this new space race, dare I say three with Rocket Lab. People back then said spacex joining the commercial crew program would just waste money for boeing are not talking like that anymore. Backups and redundancy are needed in launch platforms.

[@jtbam]

The Grift Continues....

[@Mike-yt4jq]

I doubt it. He does not have the financial support musk has via the government plus he is putting up 1 billion dollars of his own money annually. Not exactly grifter behaviour. If there is a grifter in the Space tech world I doubt it's Bezos.

[@DrDiff952]

SpaceX will reuse both booster and Starship, Heck ULA will have the next SLS built and flown before Blue Origin gets that heap of trash in the air!

[@thisguysgaming7246]

Why are they still making SLS its a waste of money

[@Krog12354]

How can you re-use something that can't take off?

[@jamesgardner2101]

Seems pretty easy. Just keep rolling it out.

[@johnruckman2320]

And what was the "technicality" this time?

[@thomaswakefield6889]

Bezos shit his pants

[@Philc231]

This rocket will have rust on it before it’s launched .

[@autogyro333]

Aluminum doesn't rust.

[@Wesley-pb2oo]

BO isn't competing with anyone yet. They are an upstart with a plan to compete in a very small market. Until they get a few successful flights that's all they are.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Well spoken

[@w13rdguy]

8:48 Finally gets to the point, then falls short. You're welcome.

[@Auto438]

what was the reason did i miss it

[@Curtlf]

2:20

[@piergaay]

@@Curtlf But that doesn't explain it; "A technical anomaly", technical anomaly of what?

[@Curtis-u9d3p]

They forgot it was supposed to take off....

[@dporrasxtremeLS3]

Man! Right in the Tenders! All these People! Next Time don't Wait UP! I Really Hope the launch goes Great when this rocket does launch. I get packages almost Everyday with Amazon, they are doing their Best! Go Team and Be Safe! Delivered! Ahead of schedule!

[@peterbrown8521]

Finally a narrative that’s not based around Blue Origin’s New Glenn marketing blurb.

[@janamanasi]

It's a complex thing and takes time for a new company.

[@thomaswakefield6889]

Takes time? Dude the fucking company has been around for over 20 years. It actually started operations before SpaceX and SpaceX is making billions right now while BO keeps losing money

[@bearinmind50]

There’s absolutely no way I’d subscribe to your nasty, slanted “reporting”!

[@michaelfrasard-z7g]

blue origon should be called blue balls!!!!

[@randirlom9508]

Thanks for the update Elon. Delays at launch are better than problems like Boeing had.

[@ems_space9049]

It’s very normal for a new rocket to not take off during the first attempt. Space is hard, valves in space are harder. Even knowing it probably wasn’t gonna launch, I still went to the cape to watch it. I wasnt annoyed that it scrubbed, i was annoyed there was no transparency with Blue. Instead of telling us what was going on, 5 times they let the clock get down to around T-10, but then would add 30 min to it. They should’ve just said they’re calling it and will try another day. But I’ll be at that scrub too 😂 I just know we need more than spacex going up there, so we should keep cheering them on, it’s an amazing rocket and I cannot wait till it actually launches Also it’s compared more to Falcon heavy, not starship. And Blue landed New Sheppard months before a Falcon 9 landed.

[@deruntergang7252]

Let him buy a Starliner with a rocket from ULA. At least it flies.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

Except for the time it malfunctioned and done blowed up.

[@TonySu-x6k]

Why is Blue Origin going to try to land on a barge at sea? SpaceX landed on land many times before transitioning to barge landings.

[@GenericGerman]

A return to the launch site requires a landing site, which can be dangerous for the equipment around. But more importantly, you need extra fuel to "turn around". And you wanna turn around quickly. So you need really strong RCS for such a huge cigar. Alternatively you could use the main engines to flip it, but that requires additional fuel and a way to settle it on the bottom of the tanks, otherwise it'll float around in liquid bubbles and end up with gas bubbles in your turbopump and you gonna have a bad day. So, extra thrusters or hot-staging.. It's rocket science.^^

[@Curtis-u9d3p]

@@GenericGerman Maybe. But why would they add the complexity and money of trying to land on a specially built barge instead of just land in the sea? They need to focus on getting the thing to fly and fly right before adding in the complexity of trying the land on a 3 dimension moving target. Looks like they are trying to hit a home-home before they've ever swung a bat.... I want to see Blue Origin succeed with this rocket, but this clearly ain't the way to do it. Needs a major management change...

[@nelsonlanglois9104]

New Glen is just a Money Dump for Jeff Beso

[@Ronolein]

Das sehe ich eben so.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

So what? He can do whatever he wants to with his money.

[@pedrosura]

Elon predicted 4 launches to Mars in 2024. That failure of prediction by that amount is tough to beat.

[@thomaswakefield6889]

Jeff Bezos predicted New Glen would launch in 2020 yet here we are 5 years later and it still a failure. While the 4 launches to Mars haven't come true, you better understand that Blue Origin, the FAA, and ULA have all sued SpaceX to keep Starship from launching. So most of the delays of Starship has come at the hands of government agencies and other civilian space agencies

[@willamcombs1106]

This is a post made to condemn those who are trying by those who will never accomplish anything except to bash others for trying. I wish they'd put as many rules and regulations on Media reporting as they do on those trying to manufacture a product. We'd never hear a peep from the media until 10 to 15 years after the event happened.

[@NightsOfTheRounds]

😂😂😂 I can imagine BO New Glen announcing a delay landing the rocket on drone ship.

[@peternesteruk5386]

Money is not issue for Blue they literally donated all profits from New Shepard . There plans don't really rely on on future contracts they got there own projects . Weather no body can control, module that froze is easy to replace and did not effect machine performance but Blue not taking chances and decides to replace module

[@orionexplorer]

You know, I am SO SICK of fan boys. How long did it take for SpaceX to get Falcon 1 into orbit? They failed to achieve the X Prize, which SpaceX was started for. There is a difference between SpaceX and Blue Origin. SpaceX believes in blowing rockets up to develop them, it looks like Blue Origin is aiming at achieving orbit on it first try. In fact, no matter what the talking heads at SpaceX say Star Ship has yet to make orbit, they have ALWAYS been sub-orbital. I thought this video would be about what went wrong last night. Instead, it was about how much SpaceX has made compared to Blue Origin. How about facts and no more fan boy garbage about how New Glenn failed to launch.

[@alcidesvaldemiro9752]

I'm upset I stay all night wake up just to be delayed 😢😢

[@jayalejandro324]

Just because you got rich doesn't mean you're smart.

[@PyroRob69]

Typical for Bezos. Delivery is always late.

[@TheRealestHi]

An obsolete rocket before it was even designed.

[@TonySu-x6k]

Seems to me that Blue Origin unnecessarily experienced an embarrassing launch cancelation, it's latest last night probably could have been in a rehearsal.

[@SCWillson]

Unlike SpaceX, Blue Origin appears to be solely for Jeff Bezos' ego.

[@moose1556]

Yet Bezos claims Space X has an unfair advantage and should be limited so they can compete. Get your act together and you will be able to compete. Unbelievable 😂

[@tortysoft]

I watched from 06:00 in the UK. I shall do it again. We need both companies, and all the UK ones too to make of Earth industrial complexes a reality. Space has run out on Earth, there is plenty of space in Space.

[@siegyriesenweber757]

How many times have they had to load and unload all the fuel? That must cost a sh_t load I suppose too.

[@metriczeppelin]

How can "both rockets be "reusable"" when BO hasn't flown yet? Just another projection of what they "plan" to do. Until NG actually flies and lands on their drone ship, there is NO comparison between them and SpaceX.

[@gregkirby9059]

Luke Skywalker "what a piece of junk"

[@terrykissner8426]

Should be called Blue Junk!!!!!!

[@Mike-yt4jq]

I don't think Bezos has the option to just blow up multiple expensive rockets. He is not government subsidized. If Space X didn't have access to so much tax payer money, they might be more cautious as well.

[@gregkirby9059]

luke skywalker "what a piece of junk"

[@jamesraymond1158]

Ugly, mean-spirited video. Doesn't even explain the problem.

[@billinct860]

What did you expect? Anything new has to go through everything as a first and they are taking care to get it right. Seems you don't understand much!

[@sus_0_6979]

It really isn't as bad as you've described, it was the first launch of a vehicle that has a hydrolox second stage. Also, if you didn't go into it seriously not even somewhat expecting a scrub, then you've got no idea what you're talking about.

[@fiatprefect]

Will Jeff Bezos astronauts be expected to p in bottles to keep on schedule like Amazon staff.

[@tokarlaszlo2918]

Az őszinteség is vezethet sikerhez, ha még kényelmetlen is az elkényeztetett rajongóknak.

[@mikelemordu5948]

Jeff should sue space X again to keep starship on the launch pad until he is ready!🤣 As for BO , I give up , I'm not going to stay awake at night for nothing....

[@SafetyBriefer]

Ass.

[@thomasboese3793]

Ah... Hold that thought... The time is 6:43 p.m. on 1/13/2025, and the countdown clock is to start fuel loading in 47 minutes. So... Will it, or won't it... the wheel of fortune turns over and over...

[@meditationsoundscapes5203]

Geoff should take a leaf from the soviet method. keep it secret till you succeed

[@justincase5272]

Close the company, sell Bezos' yacht, and pay off the debts.

[@martincday007]

Blue Origin is not in the entertainment business, it will launch when the weather is favourable and all systems are nominal, why would anyone want them to launch beforehand? If people don't want to be disappointed, they don't have to watch. StartShip's first launch was delayed due to a technical fault, when it did launch three days later it destroyed the launch pad, failed to self-destruct on command and luckily self-destructed itself, if that were Blue Origin this channel would have considered that a failure, after all who would have though that without a water deluge system the launch pad in unlikely to survive. Space X's "Launch, crash, learn" methodology takes deep pockets. Space X is way behind its own schedule for landing man on the moon, I personally like to see both companies succeed (as well as Dreamchaser) but it seems there are lots of Space X fans that only want one company to have success.

[@DaveBigDawg]

But they been waiting since 2016 to launch and so many delays it's a joke now

[@wazhushkmuskrat9907]

Should change their name to Blue Off Again What a joke.

[@billkunert7281]

Maybe the should buy reliable engines from Elon.

[@stevengeorges9046]

This video brought to you by SpaceX. 🙄 Developing new rockets is hard and comes with significant delays if you want to do it safe. SpaceX has had their significant delays but you would never no it by watching this video.

[@gregkirby9059]

LOL it will never launch....... blue orgin is out dated. SPACE X is 20-30 years ahead.

[@twelvewingproductions7508]

Space is hard. If it were easy they would have done it. I think we should cut BO some slack here as they did have a fueled and ready to go rocket on the pad. Technical issues happen. Should have it taken this long to get to the pad? Hard to say. Probably not. But then they are taking a VERY different approach to this than Space X is. Wrong approach? I'll reserve judgment on that. They are taking what I call a "Charles Emerson Winchester" approach to rocket design. They won't move forward until the previous task has been executed perfectly. If this approach results in them sticking their landing on the recovery ship the first time... then one could argue that this approach was more efficient as far as lost equipment goes. If they crash this thing 4+ times trying to get their first landing... ... then it wasn't and taking a hardware rich approach as Space X did should be considered the norm. But as I said... I'll reserve judgment on this until I see the actual performance of what they have designed. I wish them the best of luck on their next attempt.

[@WC3POchannel10A]

"Pierce. I do one thing very well and then I move on."

[@autogyro333]

Why does the booster only have fins in one plane?

[@Soggy__Toast]

Bezos should just stick launching his carnival ride.

[@billmasen3923]

I'll stick with Space X, Naer Virgin nor Blue Meanie cuts the mustard.

[@SuperUbuntudude]

Give them break!

[@memadmax69]

Dude, blue origin is made up of a bunch of amateur DEI picks. I dont think any of them including flight director steve lanius have launched a rocket before. Then theres jeff bezos.... whom I believe created blue origin for only 3 reasons: 1. government handouts for NASA missions that he was never gonna fulfill. 2. As a joke. And 3. He got serious when it wasn't a joke anymore after personal qualms with elon musk. It really is that simple....

[@lcarlson7725]

I watched....for an hour or 2. Evidently Blue Origin has no white males on staff. One reporter after another after another was female and DEI. To make matters worse, the broadcast was based on Spacex launches, complete w "clever snd cute-sy" names. When Spacex broadcasts, there are both male and females involved. DEI is not evident....only Meritocracy - and it shows. The level of analysis last night was disappointing to say the least. New Glenn will launch.. i have no doubt...but I will stream it on KZbin AFTER the fact so I don't have to be exposed to their politically correct drivel.

[@bewArcher]

Blue origins...more like Below Orbit...The fact that they gloat that they launched and created 40+ Astronauts...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA That's the same as me dipping my toes in an Olympic Swimming pool and call my self an Olympic swimmer.... Sigh

[@jimeditorial]

Surprised how negative this script is...paid troll site?

[@WyoSavage1976]

It's deserved.

[@jimeditorial]

@WyoSavage1976 Why? Everyone should hope for success of all systems

[@DrewBenderson]

For Jeff its just an expensive hobby with a sprinkle of keeping up with the jones. In the Tim Dodd Blue Origin/Jeff Bezos interview and tour. The minuscule amount of engineering passion was evident. When you watch Elon, you know that man knows each and every inch of his creation. Jeff doesnt stand a chance. Elon knows it.

[@galotorres8741]

Blooper origin

[@paulrathbun82]

Blue origin delayed again……and again……and again……and again …..ad nausem.

[@ceresfast2414]

It is better to be safe than sorry. You have nothing in this so you can only blather on. If you can do better doit or shut up

[@bernardkisby4490]

To be fair the launch hasn't been "cancelled", it's been postponed.

[@chowtimewithruss1411]

Boy, all the comments from the couch potato rocket scientists make me laugh.

[@JoyceLynn-q3m]

Appears engine ingenuity impresses many;however, statements made many issues continue to develop, delaying launch. Might simplicity be better direction. Reusability is SpaceX’s, proven in recent launches,achievements. Chats repeat… Blue Origin…baby. Developing….

[@TheEndItself]

Blue origin is no competition for anyone let alone SpaceX let's be real they haven't done a fucking thing lol. And they aren't going to

[@pedrosura]

New Glenn postponed a launch and its “cancelled” . Elon predicted four launches to Mars last year. A prediction that only morons could believe, and you guys applauded😂😂

[@wernerluis]

E. Musk never predicted a flight too Mars before 2 years

[@pedrosura]

@ Yeah, Elon said 4 rockets on 2024; 2 cargo 2 crew as well as a dear moon mission where influencers would do basically Apollo8. It doesnt matter. The man is a bullshitter. Only a moron would have believed any of this.

[@Scott-n1l5i]

It needs a new name

[@Sirtomalot-c5s]

Statue

[@rewtdawg9852]

This just sounds like a dress rehearsal to me

[@stevengaffney1363]

Is this company being affected by too many d?E!I hires

[@fraciscohidalgo778]

👏👏👏👏👏✊🏻👏👏👏👏