Blue Origin revealed What Happened with New Glenn: NO Launch until Starship Flight 7...

[@HeatherHartman-z2i]

I want to see SpaceX and Blue Origin succeed. I don’t understand how some people would want either program to fail.

[@stephenbrice8455]

I want to see both SpaceX and blue origin succeeded as well. Unfortunately, there are those that have decided to turn this into an idiotic religious war of which company is better with little regard to truth and scientific advancement. Anyway, looks like new Glen put its payload into orbit successfully. Congratulations to blue origin. Best of luck to SpaceX on their upcoming launch.

[@Cs137matt]

Bro this is a horrible vid, I admit that I am a fan of Elon and starship. this does not call into question of New Glen's reliability, all rockets have issues when they're new falcon 9 had problems starship had and has problems... I'm really considering unsubscribing from the channel because of this ridiculous bias

[@Chris-lv5ul]

I really don't get this amnesia and constant equating to a completely new/different rocket serving it's own set of purposes. the AI KZbin channels keep pushing this weird rivalry with Blue origin click bait.

[@nickpilger5190]

Ditto. The more rockets that “compete” with SpaceX, the better. The only rockets I want to see fail are any and all that are made in China.

[@danjay9682]

Space is hard

[@Spuce_Doofus]

@ its not a rivalry when BO can't get a single rocket to orbit. SX will orbit 4 this week. and likely actually launch F7B2

[@dustup2249]

@@danjay9682 Space is dark.

[@gracialonignasiver6302]

New Glenn just successfully launched to orbit first try. Lost the booster, but made it to orbit. That's a success considering how big that rocket is.

[@schrodingerscat1863]

Not really they need to land that booster to made it commercially viable. As it is the booster was destroyed during entry burn not long after separation. With any luck they will be able to determine why that happened because it will potentially need some redesign of the booster.

[@gtertgvsdfv4904]

​@@schrodingerscat1863it's the first attempt

[@Ingens_Scherz]

People seem to forget, oddly, that New Glenn is a tri-fuel system (methalox booster / hydrolox upper stage). It is therefore an "orders of magnitude" more complex system than anything SpaceX offers. It has also always - astonishingly to me - been touted as an oven-ready system that would be 100% successful on its first launch, to the point where it was actually being lined up for a Mars mission (!!!). Well, until yesterday post-scrub when expectations were rapidly lowered to an essentially "this is just a test object" level suggesting an about shift to an iterative "philosophy" which feels more like quiet panic. But, you know, physics and experience can't be ignored. It's a completely untested system RW; hydrolox is notoriously unpredictable for new systems (history shows); software is software (buggy). I want it to succeed, but if it flies this year I'll be amazed. And unless BO are suddenly willing to lose quite a few of them before it works, it won't.

[@raphael.egarcia4139]

Indeed . yet by the same token .. only reliying on one Rocket like BO or ULA .. is not good either .. if they blow .. will take for ever to replace . especialy the BE4 engines . those in themselves take way to long to assemble & test .

[@Spuce_Doofus]

25 years, zero orbital capability.

[@Logoseum]

Blue Origin never intended to launch New Glenn, it was a systems shakeout disguised as a launch attempt to try to look competitive.

[@colonbina1]

That's why they was left far behind by SpaceX

[@lhyksus6113]

I just cannot help wonder why NASA has so much faith in Blue Origin when it has not actually accomplished anything.

[@colonbina1]

I still wonder this🤣

[@thomassisk7669]

Because Jeffery plays the congress game. They control him, he wastes money, they say they are doing something It's the circle of fraud and crap

[@avgnbrkids]

They did the same thing to space x so I wouldn’t be talking

[@andyonions7864]

Lobbying.

[@Perrirodan1]

They know making rockets is hard, having a serious alternative to Space X is good

[@jhill4874]

Blue Origin a more serious competitor? It's not a competitor at all. Vaporware is NOT competition.

[@pauld6967]

As one of those who watched & waited for B.O.'s launch all the way to the scrub, I think I might skip watching live and just catch the replay.

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣

[@pauld6967]

@colonbina1 🙂

[@billmullins6833]

Why would you be up at 0 dark 30 when you can watch the video later? I'd like to know why BO wants to launch at 01:00 in the first place.

[@pauld6967]

@billmullins6833 A) I am normally up until Midnight anyway. B) It's history man! As someone who watched Apollo launches as a child, I'm not going to miss liftoffs of vehicles that'll help us return to the Moon. C) The late (or super early, depending upon your point of view) launch time is for minimal interference caused by closing the airspace in both the launch and recovery (landing) areas is what I have heard.

[@angelarch5352]

I sure hope New Glenn launches fine this week. We need another reusable rocket, at least as a backup. At most, as friendly competition to push innovation and affordable pricing.

[@richardotier6820]

What about two SpaceX reusable rockets that can actually launch on time?

[@IgiSzy]

TWO SPACEX ROCKETS, SPACEX ROCKETS

[@undertow2142]

SLS is sitting in the corner laughing it’s ass off and Boeing just raised it’s hand and said “we’re gonna need another $2 billion”

[@JessePollardII]

Not $2 billion - EACH SLS costs a minimum of $4 billion.

[@thisguysgaming7246]

They need to cancel SLS it’s a joke and it’s basically just 1960s technology being rebuilt in 2025

[@m.f.m.67]

⁠@@thisguysgaming7246if it was 1960’s technology it might actually work! It’s recycled shuttle technology, right down to the shuttle engines and solid boosters. So just how many of these things will Boeing blow up?

[@davewilson4528]

There's only one uncertainty about a New Glenn launch: which word will get used -- aborted, delayed, postponed, ...

[@michaellussier3386]

@@davewilson4528 nailed it

[@Sam_Bellwood]

Doesn't matter when it launches. It's an incredible event in the spaceflight industry. If they can land the booster on the first flight, this will be huge!

[@stratcat3216]

Failure after failure... Blue Origin's credibility is suspect at best.

[@Invert3148]

@@stratcat3216 And how many failures did Spacex encounter again? (Hint: a lot)

[@BoycottChinaa]

​@@Invert3148but SpaceX actually tried, with over 300 successful booster return landings, so the ratio of accomplishment is skewed entirely in Elons direction

[@Invert3148]

@@BoycottChinaa This is literally their first launch, this is rocket science, not a school experiment.

[@SusanRice-h1r]

It was a scrub…not an abort….please

[@frankmueller2781]

"Blue Origin announces New Glen actually constructed of cardboard and may have difficulties with launch."

[@marcwolf60]

Blue touchpaper keep getting damp. Plus the million dollar lighter does not work in a slight breeze.

[@bobpratt5399]

Both competitors should ignore missing deadlines in pursuit of their goals to launch and return. A few days here and there for such a massive effort is not the same as a running race between athletes. First across the line is not that important.

[@Soggy__Toast]

Bezos should just stick with his carnival ride.

[@MidnightOtter-19]

The new Glenn is a cool rocket. I can't wait for it's launch.

[@unconventionalvtolguy]

I can

[@edvard5697]

Can't help but thank you for validating my decision to unsubscribe from your highly bogus scripting. Seems like you think SpaceX never gets delayed due to weather or they never have had holds in their developmental flights. The BFR is nothing more than a gigantic semi truck only capable of reaching LEO by itself. And worse yet it can only deliver Starlink sats. Makes great financial sense for EM but not so much for other launch buyers.

[@Papershields001]

There was a weather delay for Starship TODAY. This channel man…just ridiculous

[@AndrewWard-p6w]

I hope the US has many successful private space companies using different technologies. That said, BO is an older company, yet SpaceX has launched 400 commercial rockets and is light years ahead of BO in rocket design, manufacturing, and software,

[@Papershields001]

“This is a joke?” Yes. This video is a joke.

[@mikeman230]

They must have hired Boeing engineers

[@joachimachtzehnter4772]

Negative comments about Blue Origin from a channel that calls itself Great SpaceX should be taken with a grain of salt. ;)

[@andrewkelly8127]

Hey Kevin, we all know your biases & prejudices in favour of SpaceX and against Blue Origin, but we continue to watch your videos nevertheless, because at least you cover what’s happening with both companies fairly comprehensively. But c’mon, how can you say that delaying New Glenn’s launch by a few days (weeks?) is a disaster, whereas delaying Starship IFT 7 by the same amount doesn’t even rate a mention? I’m also a SpaceX fan, but don’t you agree that the better New Glenn does on its first launch, the better for humanity as a whole? I bet even Elon thinks this way, because I’m certain he would value a degree of real competition to validate the incredible things that SpaceX has achieved in its 20-odd years of existence.

[@Spuce_Doofus]

Bro they have had 25 years and have nothing to show for it. they take billions in nasa grants that could go to a more serious contenders like rocketlab. BO is a massive failure. it isn't market competition when they literally do not fly orbital vehicles.

[@Krog12354]

You cannot re-use what you cannot launch.🙃

[@WorkerDroid]

It is astonishing that BO has got to this point….this is a one shot deal for them now. They built slow, and claimed perfectly, but now, it’s crunch time. Any failure signals the end for BO. Why did they put themselves in this position? Launch, se one stage separation, payload deployment, booster landing. It is ridiculously ambitious. A noose of their own making. I wish them luck, but jeez…they are gonna need it.

[@colonbina1]

Let's wait to see what they can do

[@avgnbrkids]

@@WorkerDroid it’s easier to trust your systems when you already have a rocket system that can land itself

[@andyonions7864]

SpaceX builds perfectly too. It's that grey area between theory and practice that bites engineers.

[@avgnbrkids]

@@andyonions7864 Remember the second stage that had an engine problem on Falcon. Yea nobody is 100% perfect

[@Garlander]

@@WorkerDroid "any failure signals the end of blue origin." OK where did you get your facts from? You don't think they are currently working on NG-2? One mishap and it's the end of them?

[@capohd28]

Being a bit too critical about aborts of a first time launch. SpaceX has also had delays of very similar issues with liquid methane. It really doesn't reflect on future reliability. The overall development time of New Glenn is worth scrutiny, but these delays of a new rocket debut are par for the course, especially when they are using this as a certification flight, not just a test flight.

[@gregkelly2145]

Why are BO's launch windows at 1:00 AM? Do they NOT want people to watch?

[@Garlander]

It's easier mitigate air traffic essentially, especially since it's their first launch. They get a 3 hour window. Same thing ula went through.

[@michaellussier3386]

@@gregkelly2145 NASA is trying to hide the embarrassment

[@mikeober9773]

So the delays in the launch led to the purge lines freezing up.

[@undertow2142]

It’s almost like you should build and test while you design it. It never made sense to me why you would build one of the most complex machines there is and never test it as a system until you think you’ve finished your design phase.

[@b.r.409]

I am not a big fan of Jeff Bezos, but some of your comments in this video are not fair. These minor launch delays are not a big deal. The purge system being blocked by ice should be easy to address, and is an issue with ground systems (not flight hardware). They can’t be blamed for playing it safe. It has taken them an eternity to get to the pad, but they have made it to the pad finally. And yes, they are way behind their competition.

[@jebes909090]

because elon fan boys dont care about space, just elons projects.

[@BoycottChinaa]

​@@jebes909090actually Bezos has slowed space exploration significantly, by never delivering the engines he promised ULA decades ago.. This benefitted bay jing immensely, and slowed all our progress except where Elon picked up that slack. I did not trust either initially, but 20 years of evidence is impossible to ignore

[@MJ-mv5vx]

I think the comments are fair given BO's over confidence. I remember Bezos said in an interview that landing New Sheppard was harder than landing the Falcon 9 likening it to balancing a pencil on your finger vs a broomstick on your finger. Perhaps they are entering the valley of despair and may switch to a more iterative style of launch vehicle development as they become more enlightened (Dunning-Kruger effect).

[@BoycottChinaa]

@@jebes909090 wow, pointing out deliberate failure by Bozos to buy ULA after not delivering engines leads to "sensorship" perhaps from pointing out where Bozos profit margin is created, along with all his knockoff garbage he sells, and how that place benefits from Bozos slowing US Space Program.. Sad!

[@BoycottChinaa]

@@b.r.409 youtube censorship demands antitrust antimonopoly hearings, a la AT&T origin story of breaking up "Ma Bell". Collect evidence of this and colate for class action punitive suits or forced stripping of youtube from google. Call reps and write you Congresspeople😸🍻 salute to all and happy new year

[@williamelliott6258]

Rushing the rocket to keep up with space X.. my money is on a failed launch.. bada boom

[@skive_1888]

they literally dont care about what spacex are doing

[@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars]

I can't understand why anyone is "disappointed" in NG's failure to launch. This is not the first, second or even third time it's happened. The big surprise will be when it finally does lift off if it doesn't explode!

[@colonbina1]

Too familiar with this, right?

[@engineeringoyster6243]

I’m wondering if they had ever run the APU during a fueled state. If they had, what was different on the 13th that caused the ice?

[@williampace4773]

Nope. The difference is Musk is a genius, Bezos is lucky I shop at Amazon.

[@Andrewatnanz]

truth !

[@BoycottChinaa]

@@williampace4773 TRUTH

[@arklinmike]

False. They just proved it.

[@BoycottChinaa]

@@arklinmike "they" please elaborate 😸

[@NewtTiny]

Stop being so negative competition is good and makes companies to drive

[@cut--]

I agree with your premise but his chan is a SpaceX leaning one.

[@donscheid97]

It's hardly fair to compare anyone to SpaceX, we have gotten very used to few missed launches and they don't hide their setback causes.

[@Andrewatnanz]

Their "new" hardware is old technology.

[@NOM-X]

B.S. Just hit the button. If it lands in the ocean, then its a test run. They want perfection, not gunna happen. The longer it sits, the longer it hurts the ship.

[@FredDavis-p4r]

NG1, not at all this week! My personal thoughts. You aksed the question Kevin!!

[@art.is.life.eternal]

This all happens when engineers art just sitting at computer consolers, designing sub-system and the larger rocket, and doing no actual hardware and software in the real world. Their excuse, "It's just so complex, and hard, to launch rockets!" is childish and ridiculous. This IS Rocket Science, and if, after TWEDNTY FIVE YEARS, you still haven't orbited a single vehicle, maybe it's time to look at you methodology, and CHANGING IT. Even if you manage to lumber into space - and even if you achieve an orbit, you are so far behind SpaceX you will never catch up. SpaceX's success is essentially a result of Rapid Iteration - and here's a clue, Bezos: slow is just slow, and fast leads to success. Trying to design your way to success with equipment that needs real-world testing, in as many different configurations as possible, until your basic design is repeatably successful, and subsequent launches then are used to refine that success., is the ONLY way to succeed at this. You have to lay your terrible fear of publicly failing on any number of attempts aside, and just get on with launching, gathering data about failures, and then refining, and successfully creating, rockets that are excellent There is no other way of doing this in time to be a serious competitor - which, at present, you are not. Too much timidity and fear, leading to incredibly slow progress, is the surest way to humiliation and failure. It's clear by now that your attitude toward this vehicle is like that of "My Precious," and your greatest fear seems to be that you will lose a spacecraft in what everyone knows is a TEST of it. If your ego is so frail, then designing, blowing up, and trying again and again until your spacecraft is reliable, is perhaps something that is not for you. No matter how many times you fail, your first successful orbit will wipe all the failures away, and prove your vision correct. If you are mentally unable to fail publicly, then you will never succeed publicly. You have been hand-wringing and pearl-clutching for so long that you have fallen far, far behind SpaceX - AND the Chinese - and may never be a serious 'competitor' to anyone - least of all SpaceX, which already has an entire FLEET of workhorse, reusable spacecraft, and is delivering both people and supplies to the International Space Station with dependable regularity, and delivering both their own communications satellites, and many satellites from NASA, private companies, and foreign governments. Shoot or get out of the firing line, and stop pretending to be so grandiose. It's just a rocket - you can build and launch many more... can't you?

[@JimFeig]

Weather isn't a setback to a program its just a pause.

[@AndrewWard-p6w]

Rocket science is difficult, SpaceX’s Falcon rockets make it look easy with their 400 launches, but their aggressive testing has proven to be a faster and cheaper way to develop rockets.

[@MegaWilderness]

Strange how Starship continues to fail with that plan

[@Spuce_Doofus]

@@MegaWilderness launch 7 this week. BO has zero.

[@MegaWilderness]

@Spuce_Doofus 7 failures don't count

[@AlexisRodriguez-rk1ts]

New Glenn successfully launched....

[@hansbauer9921]

JOKE? No you’re the clickbait JOKE dude.

[@patricktinneny6469]

@@hansbauer9921 not clickbait. Just being honest. BO is just wasting money and wants more of all our money without accountability. And lobbies for even more money with nothing to show for it.

[@pandibbarman]

Just a shadow of elons channela 😂

[@NewStreamLine]

You've just saved several minutes of my life. Thx a lot.

[@helixhippie]

We enjoyed hearing and feeling Blue Origin late rocket tests in Huntsville Al.

[@alexandervocelka9125]

Two major differences: one in technology and one in approach. Bezos uses incrementally improved Apollo technology and uses an extreme waterfall approach. Elon goes for multiple technology quantum leaps and applies extreme agility. The approaches are suitable for the respective technology challenges. However, New Glenn, where the name describes its incremental nature, will not be able to evolve, as every evolution would require very long Development and planning cycles. Starship on the other hand is a much more open and rapidly changeable and thus evolvable system with fast feedback tests. Nowadays complex systems are very much software defined as most hardware is software controlled or at least software designed. So a complete system test is only possible through live usage. Bezos has designed a highly complex SW defined system but lacks the ability to do inexpensive flight tests. A real dilemma.🎉

[@slkgeothermal]

I believe New Glenn will light & launch but successful recovery is very much in question.

[@easypeasy2938]

Mark my words: New Glenn will not leave the ground in January. Meanwhile, Wednesday afternoon Space X will catch their second booster. Thought: It's about company culture. To Elon, failure is an important part of the development process and is seen as a data gathering opportunity. To Bezos, failure is failure. The result is wildly different risk tolerances. Thoughts?

[@borisdominguez9089]

I totally agree. Maybe the booster isn't recovered for starship but the culture is there. Blue origin has been saying they'll land the booster on the maiden flight and has been for a while criticizing spacex for it's approach to developing rockets. However, this approach and culture from spacex is the very reason why they were the first to land an orbital boosters and are leaders in the industry

[@safetychuck2]

I agree. Totally different risk tolerance.

[@bobbrown9035]

Look at the capital cost of the two assets. Blue Orgin likely will take a pretty good hit if they lose that booster. For SpaceX it's already baked in.

[@nabreucow]

@borisdominguez9089 They have *not* said that they will land it on the first try, but they are going to *attempt* it. The amount of disinformation in here is ridiculous. Since when did Space become a political tool?

[@easypeasy2938]

@@bobbrown9035 it wasn’t originally. When space x was testing falcon Elon was one launch away from bankruptcy. Bezos may be the man in retail, but he doesn’t have the stomach for rocketry.

[@JJ_Khailha]

Start supporting Blue Origin if you care about getting to space. We need competition in the private sector to drive innovation, develop a robust workforce and lower costs and prices. This infantile fanboy behaviour is nauseating.

[@schweinefreunde.pigrescueo6441]

It is indeed sickening. But those people do not actually care about space exploration, science and technology. If they would, any launch provider reaching orbit and putting mass up there would be praised by them equally. For sure it's fine to have your preferred launchers and projects. For sure it's okay to be more excited about Perseverance than about a private company's moon lander... But those people do not actually care about technological achievements, at least, if achieved by someone else than their gourou. If NG lands on that barge, I'll be as excited about it as when that booster was caught. But them fanatics discovered what a rocket was two years ago, gave no flying fuck about space exploration before they realised they could turn the interest for a spacecraft's development into a childish, stupid as hell and toxic as can be cult, so they can feel like they belong to something big. People, you are bullying launch providers and praising SpaceX for being "absolutely perfect, incapable of failing and god sent" while they had to go through the same problems at their beginnings. Falcon 1 didn't work on it's first flights AT ALL. You are bullying rockets for crying out loud, grow up!!

[@JJ_Khailha]

@@schweinefreunde.pigrescueo6441 Well said.

[@schweinefreunde.pigrescueo6441]

@@JJ_Khailha And honestly, as I read in another comment somewhere else, I feel like if SpaceX was to start selling toilet paper they'd jump on it, fight to death for each roll of it, start praising their deity for such a groundbreaking idea and spit at everyone else all day long for being too slow to do the same. My points are that I am a huge engineering enthusiast, a huge space exploration nerd and I love watching rocket launches and space agency's milestones. But I won't start licking anyone's boots nor will I start blaming a program for being late on schedule. Seeing a rocket take off puts stars in my eyes, NO MATTER wich launcher it is. And it's good that NG is finally on it's pad and about to launch, cause it'll make some people worry, push them to not loose their advantage, and shake things up. More space exploration, more better. (Thought that's cuz my focus is space exploration, but I know that those gremlin's fanatism is about a despicable peing contest, not actually about my star filled dreams)

[@alanskyrme9048]

BONG failed to ignite. A pity. But one day soon it will. It is good that NASA continues to support ... it is a helping hand and therefore a positive move to give BONG a chance.

[@chrisgeddes26]

Got it!!! Ice formed in a purge line. Thank you for keeping your promise (reveal what happened) in the title. That seems to be rare on KZbin. Thanks again!

[@handlaidtracksand3dprinted922]

Is it a race when one team is on their 7th lap and the other still can't get out of the starting blocks? Not to mention 400+ orbital flights deploying satellites and people vs a dozen 10 minutes suborbital TikTok hops?

[@rolletroll2338]

The first launch of new Glenn will accomplish more than spaceX in 6 launch. What are you talking about?

[@frankgallagher5786]

Man you go on and on saying very little. Technical problem.

[@randywise5241]

Problems with the ships communication systems? Maybe they should use star link.😁

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣

[@pedrosura]

The only thing New Glenn should try to avoid is launching a vehicle that can not deliver a payload to orbit. Second, fail to demonstrate full reusability, recover both stages and fly them again. With this as a goal of the rocket, both New Glenn and Starship have yet to deliver success

[@danroig351]

This delay is NOT similar to a Boeing or old school rocket company delay. The first launch of the rocket is also the first launch for mission control, including every individual in that control room. There will be many opportunities for "no-go" status still to come. Once the rocket even gets to max-Q in one piece this will speak volumes, and delays will diminish.

[@robertmassie4903]

If the rockets are so serseptable to weather how are daily flights in the future going to happen?

[@etiennevanleuven7724]

That goes even more for SpaceX!

[@approt7881]

bro fr pulled out the dictionary💀4:10

[@JonelBuenaflor-b8s]

Godspeed

[@colonbina1]

🚀🚀🚀

[@VictorMawhinney]

I think they are waiting on a part coming from Amazon 😂😂

[@obbie1osias467]

Made in China???🤣🤣🤣

[@dustup2249]

Tracking says "Out For delivery" but the label has not yet been created.

[@danielm.6396]

Of couse!! SpaceX continues to excel in all of its efforts. What a phenomenal team Elon Musk has built! Watching, or should I say wasting my time awaiting Blue Origin launch also shows how deficient their attempts to mirror flight update coverage like SpaceX and NASA have given us. No technical info or live launch team conversations prove that New Glenn doesn't want us to know. I hope they succeed for sure. Thanks GreatSpaceX for your channel here and for giving us solid info! Keep up the great work!

[@Chris-lv5ul]

Challenge. Talk about Blue origin without bringing up a completely different rocket. Different/new engines, landings, fuels, size, payload, mission. This is how rockets are built. The amnesia is insane.

[@danjw1]

I believe both New Glen and Starship are waiting for favorable weather, so just slamming Blue Origin for this is ridiculous. I am staying on South Padre Island waiting for the Starship launch. I really hope that they get off on the 15th or 16th, since I need to head home on the 17th. Yes, Blue Origin is older than SpaceX and yet to get to orbit, but as far as the particular rockets and this particular launch, they are both held up by the same problem.

[@nabreucow]

Ah but you fail to understand how much the right wing idolizes the man who's teachers and parents thought he was "retarded" (their word not mine) and who claims to be a genius engineer. The man who built SpaceX from the ground up right? Oh wait, he didn't do that, he just bought it and literally paid the founder to let him claim to be the founder. I know - The man who developed self driving vehicles in five years as promised! Oh yeah... I know! The man who bought the most interacted social media company on the planet and doubled it's value! Oh wait, -90% isn't double. I know, the man who claimed that morality was the key to humanity. Oh wait, he's incredibly immoral. The man who says family and children are the most important things on Earth? Yeah kids with what, 5 women, and only one wasn't IVF. And that one won't speak to him. The man who claimed to be liberal and wanted to make the world a better place? LOL. Right. Listen Dan, trying to talk any reason to these people is useless, they can't provide a cogent response because their mouths are full of their Cheetoh and Marshmallow gods. Someday maybe they will get off their knees, but probably not.

[@didiermejia780]

Clearly muskrat fanboy here. Joke

[@FredMyers-u6z]

Still cant get it up. Thought bald men were supposed to be viril and productive. No more Dr. Evil, now he's just Dr. No (good).

[@avgnbrkids]

Booster 7 static fired and then had a scrub does this make super heavy inconsistent? 4:09

[@dcavanau1021]

I loved the image of SpaceX HLS on the moon with Cybertrucks driving around.

[@TobiH-3D]

I like your videos! Some times I wish you could up the resolution/qualtiy of your video snippets a little further :)

[@colonbina1]

Okey, thanks for your contribution. We will take note this ☺️

[@We_the_People_2A]

What difference does it make who launches first this week ? It’s still SpaceX 6 : Blue Origin 0 I don’t believe SpaceX really cares ……. 🤔

[@colonbina1]

Do you think it will become 7:0?

[@Tom-f5q8e]

@@colonbina1like all others and even space x, weather is overcast with rain but it doesn’t matter ig

[@easypeasy2938]

@@colonbina1 absolutely

[@user-fr3hy9uh6y]

@@We_the_People_2A 6 launches and still hasn't reached orbit!!!!

[@We_the_People_2A]

@@user-fr3hy9uh6y What’s your point ? BO hasn’t gone horizontal, or in space for more than 5 minutes.

[@TolisOnLine]

9:16 Better for China to focus on building some heavy mining equipment & have the flag painted on these machines.

[@modrarybivrana5654]

why couch this as a completion between Starship and New Glenn. SpaceX has launched test articles before and will again in their development process and New Glenn will be launched when BO is ready. Both should be followed and both lauded for accomplishments. There is room in space for everyone.

[@irpotatobrain5863]

SpaceX is like a baby learning to walk, experiencing falls along the way. Now, it has started to run and even swim in a shallow pool. On the other hand, Blue Origin wants to grow up quickly and skip the walking stage, aiming to sprint right away and dive into the deep end of the pool to learn how to swim. ..Lives will be Lost

[@rolletroll2338]

SpaceX show how little they care for safety with the first launch. What the hell are you talking about?

[@irpotatobrain5863]

@@rolletroll2338 what are you talking about

[@lhyksus6113]

SpaceX is manufacturing multiple super heavy boosters and Starship blocks at a very fast pace while BO is producing it rockets just 1 at a time...

[@colonbina1]

That's why BO can never beat SpaceX

[@RocketMan200]

Starship is a joke. It will never reach moon or Mars.

[@Logoseum]

@@lhyksus6113 one every 10 years!

[@anhvo398]

Of Course.

[@TJx37x]

SpaceX is amazing with everything they do, but working on this BO program it’s killing me waiting for this thing to fucking launch. Will keep my hopes up for Artemis

[@SmokeArtist420]

1:54 spacex will get the ability to launch first, not new glenn.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent work bro. Keep it up 💪🇺🇸

[@colonbina1]

❤️❤️❤️

[@Dr.Galiano]

It's the second night I've stayed up waiting to see the launch, and I end up empty-handed.

[@colonbina1]

Are you still waiting?

[@Dr.Galiano]

@colonbina1 I was 99% skeptical, but I didn’t want to miss the explosion in case the New Dildo was actually launched.

[@therealchrislamont]

diddums

[@BunyaminAtiye]

I can't believe Elon actually got into this with XAI105e

[@polska4968]

I suggest you change your name , it seems Bias , if your going to do all space content then dont name yourself directly with one , just my opinion

[@colonbina1]

We will think about this, thanks your feedback

[@stevecampbell4118]

Considering the pro SpaceX bias of the channel I think it’s pretty accurate.

[@ACPilot]

Yahh, unless it is a fanboy channel where Elon is god.. 😂

[@rswaim7607]

This is an absolute pro-Elon fanboy YT channel with zero ability to have context or balance. Rename it "ElonUberAlles"

[@barrywiththeboat9808]

These comments are valid. When Blue has a delay you call it a failure. When Space X has one its an understandable delay.. your bias is blatant and obvious. ​

[@safetychuck2]

Why is their launch window so late at night?

[@bobbrown9035]

They wanted potential airborne and seaborne conflicts to be minimal. Look how long they had exclusion zones in place for a scrub.

[@roycsinclair]

Earlier launch times were very early in the morning. Given the number of launches from the Cape with Falcon 9 adding in another set of regular flights by Blue Origin could mean those areas of the ocean where rockets may fall if they fail could be closed almost all day before long. Replace the Falcon 9 with even more frequent flights by Starship once it gets online and some areas there may be blocked off permanently.

[@jameschapman6754]

RUD Predicted for B.O.

[@jimfoard5671]

Great video. Good content.

[@HasimSema]

Man XAI105e has been blowing up recently haha

[@SS-fine]

When Blue Origin finally gets its ass into orbit, it'll be come another player in the market. But to say it'll compete with SpaceX? That's far far fetched.

[@garymazur2217]

Blue origin ok supposed to launch Oct.,Nov., dec., Jan., who cares it's a joke. First launch date: 2010,2015, 2018, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025? How about scrap yard 2025. " YEH ". 🎆🎆🎆🎆🎆

[@nelsonlanglois9104]

New Glen is just a Money Dump for Jeff Beso

[@craigriddell1169]

As they found out with Apollo, GO FEVER can cause serious set backs and come at quite a cost. No sense risking all the time , money and effort spent trying to meet public expectations on a contrived rivalry.

[@alanb8116]

Briefly, I have little or no confidence in Blue Origin. They are nowhere near competition to SpaceX. As far as the Chinese, of course they’re proceeding quickly. When you steal all of your technology from the United States, you don’t have to worry about things like actually developing technology yourself. Even when they do that, it’s about a 50% to 60% chance that they may kill an entire Village while trying to launch one of these alleged rockets. The damn things fall apart as they are launching! Chinese Rockets… they should just stick to making bottle rockets…

[@cbnc6861]

Don't hold your breath. Delay Delay Delay NG1

[@SusanRice-h1r]

Weather at the….New Glenn Launch Area????……you mean the Cape….because that sounds like weather just around the the launch pad area

[@anthonycasola8729]

weather who? 1:29

[@JoyceLynn-q3m]

Enjoyed interesting and informative video. ✨

[@colonbina1]

❤️❤️❤️

[@Papershields001]

Hey hey. Hey. Guess what happened…

[@Papershields001]

Oh oh. And guess what happened now…

[@TommyCoates-y5m]

The potential of XAI105e is huge!

[@RobertGeorge-w1t]

I doubt they will succeed in launching anytime 😂 this month. HOWEVER if they decide to repurpose the NG as a rocket ANCHOR, they’ll nail 😂 it.

[@drnick40]

J.B. couldn’t get it up..

[@dreadous]

Jeff's not really interested in kit bashing until you get it to function properly. He thinks mathing it out equals final product.

[@ragder13]

Just because New Glenn is almost as big as Starship doesn’t mean Blue Origin can be directly compared to SpaceX. SpaceX has an immense amount of data collected before, during, and after each launch and landing, which forms the foundation for Starship’s development. Data is king. Blue Origin’s primary competitors are Relativity, Rocket Lab, and Firefly.

[@rogerstarkey5390]

"Almost as big"? It's not even close

[@roberteberhard5137]

yet it's never left the ground 🤣

[@DJ-bh1ju]

It's still a brand new system... gonna be some bugs to work out....

[@Astranamic]

No more DEI, LET'S GET BACK TO THE MOON

[@MuratAyse-j9f]

Just watched your video on XAI105e! The buzz from Elon Musk’s podcast has me hyped!