Prophet Muhammad himself said that his name is Ahmad. Evidence: Prophet Muhammad said: "I have many names: I am Muhammad, *I am Ahmad..."* (Sahih Muslim 2354b) Also exists in Bukhari.
@turkie3577Күн бұрын
If you could put the whole hadeeth in here it would be very helpful 👍
@AdrianMuslimКүн бұрын
@@turkie3577 Sure. Here it is: Jubair b. Mut'im reported on the authority of his father that he heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: I have many names: I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am al-Mahi through whom Allah obliterates unbelief, and I am Hashir (the gatherer) at whose feet people will be gathered, and I am 'Aqib (after whom there would be none), and Allah has named him as compassionate and merciful. (Sahih Muslim 2354b) .
@AdrianMuslimКүн бұрын
@@turkie3577 Sure. Here: I have many names: I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am al-Mahi through whom Allah obliterates unbelief, and I am Hashir (the gatherer) at whose feet people will be gathered, and I am 'Aqib (after whom there would be none), and Allah has named him as compassionate and merciful. (Sahih Muslim 2354b) .
@gamingsakin3604Күн бұрын
Ahmad is a another name of our prophet Muhammad pbuh
@mohx2847Күн бұрын
Yes. That's correct and to answer Bobby and Allah knows best It could be the fact that Ahmed was understood in Aramaic as a synonym to Muhammad in Arabic.
@theuralictribes5689Күн бұрын
Mohammed was never prophesied to come in first pace as a legit prophet. Hopefully the last and final prophets will tell you the same thing one day soon if you'll ever be in Jerusalem or watch the news showing the 2 prophets dressed in sackcloth.
@Nadaismail5765Күн бұрын
Mohammed : the praised one Ahmed : the praised one Pbuh, same name ..
@muslimresponse103Күн бұрын
Muhammad ﷺ peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. say it fully not “pbuh”.
@TheWatchmanWebsiteКүн бұрын
So why did the Qur'an go with *ISA* instead of *YASUWA,* (the historically correct Arabic translation of the Aramaic *Yeshua)* used for Jesus by Arab Christians for hundreds of years before Islam (and is the name used in Arabic Bibles)? People will perish because of lack of knowledge! You say: "What about Arab Christians who use "Isa" in their speech?" Because they were under Islamic 0ccupation and had no choice but to adopt "Isa" as a *code* for Yasuwa for ease of communication with the occupying population, but they reject outright the *person* called Isa of the Qur'an. Yeshua (Aramaic) translates in Arabic to Yasuwa/Yasu. Some Muslims find some slight similarity between the Eastern Syriac translation for Yeshua, *"Isho"* and *"Isa"* used in the Qur'an. However, these are totally different names. The Aramaic Yeshua’ was pronounced something like yay-shoo-a’, with emphasis on the “shoo”, hence 'Y'shu' or 'Isho' in Eastern Syriac. You see, Isho traces back to Yeshua (Aramaic)/Joshua (Hebrew) Yehoshua/ *Yeho* (YAHWEH) *shua* (SAVES). Allah is not the monotheistic YAHWEH/YHWH/I Am That I Am of Exodus 3:15 whose glory (Kavod Hashem), out of his love, *entered creation* and *dwelt among the people* in the tabernacle of Moses (Exodus 40) and the temple of Solomon in Jerusalem (2 Chronicles 7). But Allah says he is too majestic and it does not befit him to enter creation and dwell with mankind! There's no history (where?) of this 7th century god before the 7th century Qur'an, only the history of YAHWEH. Ok, let's even suppose that Muslims were successfully able to prove that Isa does trace back to Yeshua (Jesus), this would be destructive for Islam since Yeshua bears the name of another God whom Muslims do not worship-YAHWEH the true Creator and Most High. If Isa does not translate to Yeshua, Isa is false. If Isa translates to Yeshua, Isa is still false because Yeshua bears the name of YAHWEH, the true God who is not Allah of the Qur’an. You see, *"ISA"* is a 7th century false character invented from the original 1st century Yasuwa and from folktales, gnostic and heretical sources such as the so-called "Infancy Gospel of Thomas", "The Gospel of Pseudo Mathew" (Unknown), and "The Second Treatise of the Great Seth" circulating at the time. Isa is not the historical Jesus of the 1st century. Now we can understand why Muslim say, "Isa" was not crucified. They are right. He was not. It was Yasuwa who was crucified. When Muslims say Isa was only a creation, they are right. He was a creation of Muhammad's imaginati0n. When Muslims deny Isa's divinity, again their are right. It is Yasuwa who is divine. Let him who has ears hear! Blessings.
@RebbieAlmoКүн бұрын
As a former Christian, I found this mind blowing! Crazy how Paraclete was mistranslated to make it fit the narrative of a Trinity.
@GrowWithInfo-1028Күн бұрын
You know what is even crazier, the injeel was hidden in the Vatican for 12 centuries Read what Jesus said When Jesus had said this, Philip answered: 'We are content to serve God, but we desire, however, to know God. For Isaiah the prophet said: "Verily thou art a hidden God," and God said to Moses his servant: "I am that which I am." Jesus answered: 'Philip, God is a good without which there is naught good; God is a being without which there is naught that is; God is a life without which there is naught that liveth; so great that he filleth all and is everywhere. He alone hath no equal. He hath had no beginning, nor will he ever have an end, but to everything hath he given a beginning and to everything shall 0:05 he give an end. He hath no father nor mother; he hath no sons, nor brethren, nor companions. And because God hath no body, therefore he eateth not, sleepeth not, dieth not, walketh not, moveth not, but abideth eternally without human similitude, for that he is incorporeal, uncompounded, immaterial, of the most simple substance. He is so good that he loveth goodness only; he is so just that when he punisheth or pardoneth it cannot be gainsaid. In short, I say unto thee, Philip, that here on earth thou canst not see him nor know him perfectly; but in his kingdom thou shalt see him for ever: wherein consisteth all our happiness and glory.' Philip answered: 'Master, what sayest thou? It is surely written in Isaiah that God is our father; how, then, hath he no sons?' Jesus answered: 'There are written in the prophets many parables, wherefore thou oughtest not to attend to the letter, but to the sense. For all the prophets, that are one hundred and forty-four thousand, whom God hath sent into the world, have spoken darkly. But after me shall come the Splendour of all the prophets and holy ones, and shall shed light upon the darkness of all that the prophets have said, because he is the messenger of God.' And having said this, Jesus sighed and said: 'Have mercy on Israel, O Lord God and look with pity upon Abraham and upon his seed, in order that they may serve thee with truth of heart. His disciples answered: 'So be it, O Lord our God!' Jesus said: 'Verily I say unto you, the scribes and doctors have made void the law of God with their false prophecies, contrary to the prophecies of the true prophets of God: Wherefore God is wroth with the house of Israel and with this faithless generation.' His disciples wept at these words, and said: 'Have mercy, O God, have mercy upon the temple and upon the holy city, and give it not into contempt of the nations that they despise not thy holy covenant.' Jesus answered: 'So be it, Lord God of our fathers.'
@theuralictribes5689Күн бұрын
There is no such thing as a Former Christian, if you left then you were never a born again believer in the first place. But that's ok Jesus did predict a massive apostasy from the faith to happen before he will return at the end of the 7 Year Tribulation.
@RebbieAlmoКүн бұрын
@IdoltaryTheGreatestSin-1028 Wouldn't surprise me at all, the Vatican has done much worse. This is very intriguing, where did you find this? Do you have a link?
@IhatecucumbersanddogsКүн бұрын
U knw what crazy, u think it’s normal for a 50 yr old to bed a 9 yr old. U will have to defend tht as long as ur Muslim.
@RebbieAlmoКүн бұрын
@theuralictribes5689 You don't know me lol, you don't have a right to say I was never a "born again believer". There was a time I would have said something very similar to someone who left Christianity, but then my eyes were opened and I read what Jesus actually says in the Bible. Go back and read the red letters, ignore everything else for a minute. Jesus prayed to God, submitted his will to God, repeated the Shema (God is One), said the Father was greater, said he could do nothing without the Father, referred to the Father as his God, referred to God as the only true God, said there is no one good but the Father, he didn't know the hour. This is all contradictory to the doctrine of the Trinity- three persons in one, all fully God, all coequal. God is not the author of confusion. If there was really a Trinity, why didn't Jesus reveal that? Why isn't it stated anywhere plainly in scripture? If Jesus was God, why didn't he state it plainly? Why was the entire message of the old testament that God is One and to worship Him alone, then all of a sudden there is a Trinity? And God sent his son (himself) to die to save us from... himself? And we needed a savior because were all born guilty with the sin from Adam, the sin God knew Adam would commit but allowed it to happen and then cursed all mankind forever because of it (even though the Bible states repeatedly that the son will not be punished for the sin of the father)? And we can only get to heaven by believing in the savior but God waited thousands of years to send the savior? Doesn't it make more sense that God is a loving and merciful God, One God, who loves us and will forgive us of our sins if we just ask Him? That Adam asked for forgiveness and was forgiven, no curse upon mankind? God is not a God of confusion.
@OktavianAbelКүн бұрын
Both Ahmad and Muhammad are derived from Arabic roots related to praise, and they share similar meanings. 1. Muhammad (مُحَمَّد): The name Muhammad comes from the Arabic root ḥ-m-d (حمد), which means "to praise" or "to thank." The name Muhammad literally means "the praised one" or "the one who is worthy of praise." 2. Ahmad (أَحْمَد): The name Ahmad is derived from the root ḥ-m-d as well, but it is a different form of the same root, meaning "the most praised" or "the one who praises (Allah/God) the most." Ahmad can be understood as meaning "the most praiseworthy" or "the one who is praised to the highest degree." God and His angels praises him : Surah Al-Ahzab (33:56): "Indeed, Allah and His angels send blessings upon the Prophet. O you who have believed, ask [Allah to confer] blessing upon him and ask [Allah to grant him] peace." (Quran 33:56) In the Gospel, Jesus (pbuh) speak about another "Son of Man" (human being) to come after him : Mark 8:38 [38] Those who are ashamed of ME and of MY words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of HIM the Son of Man will also be ashamed of them when HE comes in the glory of HIS Father (Lord) with the holy angels.” Significance in Islam: Both names are used in Islamic tradition to refer to the Prophet Muhammad. Muhammad is the more common name used, but Ahmad appears in certain verses of the Quran (such as in Surah As-Saff 61:6), where it is used to refer to a prophetic figure that Muslims believe is the same person as Muhammad. In Islamic belief, both names highlight the praise and honor bestowed upon the Prophet. To summarize, both Ahmad and Muhammad have meanings related to praise, with Muhammad meaning "the praised one" and Ahmad meaning "the most praised" or "the one who praises (God) the most."
@KS_VIDEOTECHКүн бұрын
In many cultures, including Arab culture, names often have significant meanings. People are not just identified by the form of their names but also by the meanings those names carry. For example, when Jesus (peace be upon him) mentioned that someone named "Ahmad" would come after him, it was not only referring to the literal name but also the qualities associated with it. The name "Ahmad" means "the one who praises Allah the most," highlighting a specific characteristic of the prophet to come. This understanding is supported by the fact that during the time of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), none of his opponents-whether they were pagan Arabs, Christians, or Jews-ever criticized him by saying, "You claim to be the prophesied prophet named Ahmad, but your name is Muhammad, so you must be lying." If such an argument had merit, they would have used it. Instead, they understood that names in their culture reflected meanings and attributes, not just the literal word.
@alchannel8949Күн бұрын
Ahmad is a Kind of respect like when the hebrews Say Muhaddim ( im) in the end . so In Arabic is translated as Ahmad instead of Muhammadim
@IAmWhoIAm5224Күн бұрын
Bro, you just said para when used in a compound word could indeed mean beyond or excess, so, parakletos too is a compound word. So, it does hold the meaning in this context as well
@SAUDI-JAPANКүн бұрын
Watch it again..., Its meaning varies with each word it is combined with.
@faris8268Күн бұрын
@@SAUDI-JAPAN The variation of meaning is what supports their research in the video. Whether the meaning is correct depends on whether it fits the context, and as they show in the video, the "excessively praised" meaning solves the issue known as the Paraclete Problem so it's a more suitable meaning
@IAmWhoIAm5224Күн бұрын
@@SAUDI-JAPANi believe you need to learn more on linguistics
@AJ-pc9gu10 сағат бұрын
He speaks Greek, bro. I'd trust him over you guys. His point is that you can't define para = "excess over" because it only attains that meaning as a compound. Either way, Kleos != Kletos. Two completely different words. We can't use weak arguments and expect others to take us seriously.
@thephilistine4449 сағат бұрын
@AJ-pc9gu I'm a student in Ancient Greek classics and I can confirm that the original video makes no mistake, kleos is the noun form (meaning praise) and kletos which is the verbal adjective form (meaning either called or praised), both have the verb form "kleo" (which means either to call or to praise). They are also correct that para can mean excess in compound words such as parakletos, and they provided evidence for this from linguistics professor Despina Chila-Markopoulou
@l3ll5lКүн бұрын
Brother chatgpt doesnt give you it directly: 1. Kleitos kletos was spelled interchangeable in ancient Greek if you ask it that way it will admit it even give you examples from the plutarch manuscripts . 2. The sources provided use exactly the spelling found in John. We can even find 1 John using kletos for kleitos in perikletos. Para is already a prefix you must look at those dictionaries. I asked chat gpt it said it has no acess so I needed to verify myself but it is explained there. I have also pictures of the sources if you are interested.
@l3ll5lКүн бұрын
For example there are a lot of other sources that explains kletos as endoxos glorified like didymus chalcenterus 1 century famous grammarian. He explains the name dourikletos with kletos meaning endoxos glorified praised. Also the Plutarch manuscripts use kleitos and kletos interchangeable as explained. Kleitos is more of a modern standard way of spelling it. This argument is incredible strong irrefutable even but one must see the academic references. It has multiple layers of a miracle. One even the use of Ahmad instead of Muhammad.
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah13 сағат бұрын
@@l3ll5l I managed to access an original Greek manuscript of Didymus Chalcenterus’s scholia on the Iliad, and I can confirm that he uses κλητος (kletos) and κλειτος (kleitos) interchangeably to mean “famed” or “praised”. Allahu Akbar. The truth is being exposed.
@AJ-pc9gu10 сағат бұрын
Kleitos is not Kleos. Kletos is not Kleos. Sorry I used to believe this argument but when I read more it's false. The dourikletos ("called by the spear") argument doesn't work, because it was just Plutarch's annotation. He put "glorified" to make it clearer what Homer meant, not that they are synonyms. What you did is you jumped to Kleitos and Kletos argument based off of dourikletos, but you first need to prove the dourikletos argument.
@thephilistine4449 сағат бұрын
@AJ-pc9gu Dourikletos does not mean called for the spear, Didymus Chalcenterus (1st century BC) defines it as spear-praised, using the word endoxos, which is the same word Hesychius of Alexandria uses to define kletos. Also kleitos (κλειτός) and kletos (κλητος) are different spellings of the same word as the esteemed Ancient Greek linguist Christian Gottlob Heyne confirms in his critical edition of Homer's Iliad. When the word kletos appears, he adds a footnote confirming it has the same meaning as kleitos (praised/glorified) so people don't think it means "called" as it can have two meanings Similarly, kleos, kletos and kleitos all come from the verb form kleo. Prof Gregory Nagy confirms that kleo is usually translated as praise. So the research is sound and is backed by reputable linguists and ancient sources
@l3ll5l9 сағат бұрын
@AJ-pc9gu like the brother pointed out but moreover why did you ignore the part of the spelling? Kletos is explicitly explained as endoxos as its second meaning in the spelling found in John. But even if not we already see kletos and kleitos being used interchangeable in ancient Greek evident from the manuscripts. Its like color and colour. I recommend first to understand the argument and its evidences more clearly. This argument is really strong incredible strong.
@OrphanmuslimgirlКүн бұрын
I am the daughter of Gaza, and I swear to God that we will remain as tall as the mountains. We will not🇵🇸 kneel, and I ask you, by God, our Muslim brothers, to pray for us 🇵🇸
@Abd-al-QadrКүн бұрын
Ya Rabb 🤲 😢
@faris8268Күн бұрын
Chatgpt is wrong when it said kleos comes from kluo, rather it comes from kleo, which is the same root of kletos (kleo and kaleo are different forms of the same root), so kletos can definitely mean praised!
@memekitten541016 сағат бұрын
Yea chat gpt makes a lot of mistakes, you shouldn't trust it
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah15 сағат бұрын
Just to correct you, καλέω (kaleo) and κλέω (kleo) do not come from the same root. But linking the two isn’t incorrect because Bible scholars themselves do it (i.e. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance), so did the Ancient Greeks especially during the “Archaic” period when spellings weren’t fixed due to how similar both words were in pronounciation and meaning. Here’s what Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance says about “kleo”: _”From a shorter form of KALEO; _*_renown_*_ ( _*_as if being called_*_ ) -- _*_glory_*_ .”_ Also, the name of the Ancient Greek goddess Cleta (which means “renown/illustrious”) is spelled Κλήτα instead of Κλειτα, as if it’s from the same root as κλητος in the word Παράκλητος (Paraclete). I think “Paraclete” was originally spelled as “Παράκλειτος” similar to the Greek names Ἡράκλειτος (Herakleitos meaning “fame of Hera”) or Πολύκλειτος (Polykleitos meaning “much famed”) etc but the early scribes of the gospel of John unintentionally corrupted it into the spelling we have today to make it “make sense”. Don’t forget, the earliest manuscripts we have about the Paraclete in John date to the 200s.
@faris826812 сағат бұрын
@@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allahthanks for sharing this info! From the lexicons I looked at (Strong's Concordance, Wiktionary) it looks like kaleo and kleo are simply two forms/spellings of the same word, and obviously kletos is derived from the kleo spelling (otherwise it would be spelled "kaletos" if it was from kaleo) According to Prof Gregory Nagy who they cite in the vid, kleo is usually translated as praise Interesting to see kletos had two different spellings in ancient times. I don't think it's even necessary to suppose that the scribes changed the spelling, because we can see from the Hesychius lexicon they mention in the vid that the spelling in John's gospel also holds the meaning of praised/glorified
@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah12 сағат бұрын
@@faris8268 No, kaleo and kleo are not two spellings of the same word. In Ancient Greek, “kleo” is a mix of two words - “kaleo” (to call) and “kleo” (to praise). The word “kaleo” got shortened to “kleo” and the shortened form simply merged together with the already existing word “kleo”. This is why the word “kleo” has two different definitions in Ancient Greek dictionaries. But the word is a merge of two words. You can confirm by comparing etymology 1 and 2 of kleo on wiktionary. It’s similar to how words in English have two completely unrelated meanings (like “Light”, which can = not heavy, or can = brightness). This is because overtime with no standardized spellings, words that sound the same can end up sharing the same spelling despite being completely unrelated. An example today is how people confuse words like “you’re” and “your”, or “yoke” and “yolk”. There is definitely some level of corruption and change going on. You will never find “kleo” and “kaleo” being used interchangeably anywhere in the modern Greek New Testament. They are kept distinct. “Kaleo” and the words derived from it never mean “praise”, and the word “Paraclete” was spelled so as to be assigned under this root. The only evidence of interchangeability between the two exists in some ancient manuscripts. So there’s some “cleaning up” that was done by the scribes.
@faris826812 сағат бұрын
@@Isa_is_the_Messenger_of_Allah Wow thanks for all this insight! Are you on Twitter/X or Discord by any chance? Would be interested to discuss all this as I find the topic fascinating
@kb4432Күн бұрын
Every prophet of God knew about the final messenger. Peace and blessings be upon all of them
@oussamarekik154212 сағат бұрын
Whenever i see the word paraclete/parakletos, I always wonder what did Jesus say in his mother tongue before it got translated into Greek in the scripture.
@الالعربي21 сағат бұрын
In Arabic, he was called Ahmed in the Quran because it was in the past Mohamed was not born yet. So he was Ahmed (the one will be loved), but when he was born, the name is Mohamed ( the loved one ). It is a matter of past and present, both names come from the same root
@alaasaid91157 сағат бұрын
He gives references , he named two lexicons .... You googled ! And objected
@hasan3step570Күн бұрын
The issue with the holy spirit being the paraclete that Jesus (pbuh) spoke of is that its supposed to relay only what it hears. Now if this was referring to the holy spirit (which is God in the christian theology) then it would be relaying what it already knows since God is all knowing already. It wouldnt be hearing somebody elses message and relaying it. And on top of that they say you can not "get" the bible unless the holy spirit is within you but what prophecies of the future did the holy spirit specifically bring? What new information did the holy spirit bring after Jesus? Nothing at all.
@blackyailoКүн бұрын
Ahmad and Muhammad have actually very similar meanings. Even if you don't take it as a name and more like an adjective. then the verses in the Quran could be changed in the translation as "and giving good news of a messenger after me whose name will be very praised" We as Muslims include in all of our daily prayers a dua to bless the Prophet Mohammad
@grimreaper9477Күн бұрын
17:40 bobby ur missing the point… parakletos IS a compound word, thats what he is saying.
@ginsan819821 сағат бұрын
Ikr? Linguists would understand this approach. I don't understand how Bobby has a hard time understanding this.
@enesyakac20 сағат бұрын
@@ginsan8198 Yeah, maybe he was too fixated on him being devils advocate.
@AJ-pc9gu10 сағат бұрын
I must confess I don't know how compound words work in greek, since I don't speak it. However, Kleos and Kletos are two different words despite sounding the same. So although I used to subscribe to this theory, the evidence is not in it's favour. I don't want us to believe in weak arguments
@faris826810 сағат бұрын
@AJ-pc9gu The video provided evidence from the Ancient Greek grammarian Hesychius of Alexandria that kletos means praised/glorified (endoxos). The word endoxos used by Hesychius to define kletos has the same root as doxa, which is used in some Greek translations of the Qur'an to translate hamd, so the evidence is in favour of the theory. The reason Bobby thinks that kleos and kletos are from different roots is because ChatGPT made a mistake and told him kleos is from kluo but really it's from kleo
@AJ-pc9gu8 сағат бұрын
@@faris8268 Kletos is from Kaleo. Gpt is right on that. The debate is just can Kletos also mean the same as endoxos. The answer is yes.
@laddissaКүн бұрын
It is a compound word. Paracleet or whatever. Its not just para, so it does mean what they say it means in the video
@MrSongib17 сағат бұрын
He dosent get it i think
@noelmalik5018Күн бұрын
“Very” on its own would still convey the idea of excess. The word to follow it only subjects the “excess” to a particular item. For example, very good - an excess of good, very bad - an excess of bad. The conveyance of the word “very” is not of itself dependent upon the word that follows it.
@TheLastAirbender3468Күн бұрын
it's a bit odd to consider the holy spirit as the parakletos , when the holy spirit is supposedly GOD , while the parakletos speaks Only as he hears , unless you consider the holy spirit as an inferior God and needs instructions from the superior God on what to speak
You should make another video clearing the misunderstandings you had in this video, surely you must have read the comments correcting you
@ahmadmna.338817 сағат бұрын
18:52 What about this ancient greek dude who definitely told that keltos is the glorious
@sub7se7en20 сағат бұрын
para by itself doesn't mean that but para- does, because that's the beginning of a compound. Parakletos is a compound word.
@enesyakac20 сағат бұрын
I didn't even have to go to the comment section to learn that. Bobby himself said it, then, for some reason didn't see the application to paracletos. Tbh, I think it is praiseworthy to not accept something blindly and investigate the claims, but the investigation itself shouldn't be halfhearted aswell. It ruined the rest of his reaction for me, because of his false presupposition, which lead to, in my view, false conclusion.
@MrHash91116 сағат бұрын
Brother Bobby your objectivity is honestly what makes me love your videos. As you we'll know the prophet Isa peace be upon him spoke Aramaic not Arabic. In general to understand that Ahmed and Mohammed are the same you would need a certain level of knowledge in the Arabic language. The Arabs of that time had extensive knowledge of Arabic but there was no exact science established behind it, kind of like how a child would know how to speak but wouldn't know grammatical rulings. The Arabs of that time, Jews christians or mushrikeen, never raised this as an argument against the prophet because they knew that Ahmed and Mohammed are the same. As for the verse itself in the bible it has indeed been removed or changed as we have sayings from the Sahaba, those who were christian, that told of this verse. May Allah bless you and guide you to what pleases him.
@tamerelsayed54567 сағат бұрын
If kletos is an argued point, then let’s put it aside for now. Para(syllable) means excessive(syllable), above(syllable) or beyond(syllable) as in paranormal is beyond normality! So if kletos means call in or summon, who’s (para) called or summoned or mentioned in the world? Whose name excessively mentioned with praise right after Allah in every adhan and salah?
@urfavouriteedits161816 сағат бұрын
The best thing that I like about brother Bobby is that he is always unbiased and always tries to seek the truth and I love it. Love from India
@FreePalestine_____Күн бұрын
Thank you for reacting to my favorite channel.
@feeeyniac10 сағат бұрын
Yooo Bobby. What's up? I've seen your videos for a while and it's awesome. Your views are quite different and that's good. But, I have some suggestions. Your microphone.. Why is it.. Deep/shallow? I mean. I need to raise my phone to full volume to hear you talking. Maybe raising your volume more? Or it is just me?
@reveilerКүн бұрын
As someone who is more or less familiar with how etymology works and how much vagueness and uncertainty there is to it in the department (I'm no expert but I studied language so I'm familiar with the field) I feel like I have to say, things like these, very old words from very old languages and especially translations of these words open up a lot of possibilities for wrong transmission. I have seen so many examples of almost identical sounding words that have a symbolic commonality of meaning between them that are attributed to "extremely different" origins that I kind of started to believe there is a conspiracy here to hide the origins of words, ideas and knowledge etc. to keep people ignorant while the ones who get the "real education" can control them. Call me paranoid and educate me if you know better (I mean anyone, not just Bobby) but this is where I stand now. Salam alaykum.
@Ace055517 сағат бұрын
Of course, to muddy the water, or how else they kept the masses in line unchallenged.
@rahatlatcvehuzurverici946Күн бұрын
Hey Bobby, is the professor's name also wrong at 18:52? Or is the person here misquoting the professor? You also need to be fair to us and verify things before just saying, "It is not fair."
@ahmadradwan5914Күн бұрын
MOHAMAD MEANS THE PRAISED , AHMAD MEANS MORE PRAISED .... BOTH NEVER USED BEFORE PROPHET MOHAMAD
@alchannel8949Күн бұрын
Ahmad is a Kind of respect like when the hebrews Say Muhaddim ( im) in the end . so In Arabic is translated as Ahmad instead of Muhammadim
@maruf2050Күн бұрын
That's not true at all. At least 6 people were named Muhammad during the time of Prophet Muhammad Peace be upon him, including one of his companions.
@ahmadradwan591423 сағат бұрын
@@alchannel8949 u r not arab ... right?
@ahmadradwan591423 сағат бұрын
@@maruf2050 all are weak narratives for those who named mohamad before the prophet .. but certain groubs just adore weak narratives
@ahmadradwan591423 сағат бұрын
@@alchannel8949 افعل صيغة اكثار و ليست صيغة تبجيل فمحمد مبجل بقدر احمد
@OrphanmuslimgirlКүн бұрын
Your sister from Gaza🇵🇸, Palestine. All of my family members were martyred and our home was destroyed. We will not leave Gaza and we will not surrender. We will continue on the path despite all the circumstances. Thank you to those who left. And encourage me. Comment 😢😢
@wildteam365Күн бұрын
Inshallah Palestine will be free 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
@mohammadhusein8142Күн бұрын
May god protect you and people of gaza
@mtmadv7872Күн бұрын
May ALLAH SWT accept your martydom and help all our beloved Palestinian brothers and sisters... AAMEEN 🤲🏻🤲🏻🤲🏻🤲🏻🤲🏻
@mokhtar4426Күн бұрын
How can I help to you?
@TakeOneSipКүн бұрын
Stop commenting this everywhere
@NameSurname-st5pb15 сағат бұрын
I like this. Bobby even being a muslim now still keeps his critical thinking and says what he feels. Perfect 🎉 Never loose your critical thinking bro. We never needed to force feed meaning to islam anyway. With time islam has always proved itself.
@ConquerorOfMountains15 сағат бұрын
fr
@ganderia007Күн бұрын
SubhanAllah i saw this video a week ago. Alhumdolillah live the part when you said "I find this a compelling argument." ❤ Love watching your objective approach to everything. May Allah SWT preserve you and keep you healthy my brother.
@fahimredwanКүн бұрын
Love your videos Bobby🥰🥰🥰
@ziausmani8410Күн бұрын
Some Islamic traditions view the name Ahmad as another given name of Muhammad at birth by his mother
@Carlito_El_GoonerКүн бұрын
Ahmad is the diminutive term for Muhammad a.s., just like Tony is the diminutive term for Antonio or Anthony. Also, Ahmad means 'the most praised' while Muhammad a.s. means one who is praised. Both come from the same root word, 'hamida' which means to praise.
@MrSongib17 сағат бұрын
The funny thing is every meaning of Parakletos in the video are fit neatly on what the Prophet Muhammad SAW is. Despite you misunderstood the whole debucle of the video, but I'm glad I and other got it. Salam.
@AJ-pc9gu11 сағат бұрын
Firstly I'm excited you covered this because you are Greek speaking! Secondly I think Ahmad is used because it's about the meaning of the word, not the name itself. The name Ahmad doesn't exist in Aramaic, but the Qur'an is arguing that Isa PBUH used an Aramaic equivalent.
@rahatlatcvehuzurverici946Күн бұрын
Hey Bobby in18:43, he is referring to that source. So, are you saying even the source is wrong or is he misquoting the source?
@binmanbinmanКүн бұрын
24:33 Here it doesn’t matter if that is what the reader sees it as, since the entire point would be that he realizes leaving it as a name would make more sense linguistically. Either way, Muslims would see the spirit of Truth as the Prophet ﷺ due how those words are used in the Bible.
@Nuurah951Күн бұрын
Ahmed is another name of prophet mohamed, Ahmed means ( highly praised) and mohamed (the praiseworthy) .
@TheVisualanteКүн бұрын
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “I have several names: I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am Al-Mahi (the one by whom Allah eliminates disbelief), I am Al-Hashir (the one who will be resurrected before or around whom people will gather), and I am Al-Aqib (the last Prophet).” (Sahih Muslim, Book 30, Hadith 5811) The meaning of Ahmed vs Muhammad is that Ahmed means the person who praises God the most and is themselves worthy of being most praised which is tied to the spiritual praising of Allah. Muhammad means the one who is actually praised frequently by others. Ahmed is more tied to his internal worth due to his spiritual reverence of Allah while Muhammad is tied to the people praising the person due to his character. Why this is significant to be used by Jesus alaihilsalam is because the criticism that the prophet Muhammad Alaihil salatu Walsalam will get by the ones claiming to follow Jesus is that he is blaspheming God with his denouncing of Jesus as God but in reality Jesus is emphasizing the name that confirms the prophet’s message being the one message that praises God the most and delivered by the person who’s internal character praises God the most and who’s name would reflect that. The prophet’s sallalahu alaihi wassalam’s name(s) encompass this. It’s to say not only should you follow his theological message due to its reverence to Allah but you should also revere the prophet who comes with that message because they are most worthy due to the very thing you will criticize him for. It’s actually a profound distinction when you think about the wisdom of Allah and the wisdom He bestowed on Jesus in his manner of communicating.
@KinKon-oi4dxКүн бұрын
Good day to you brother Bobby
@MrSongib17 сағат бұрын
16:25 About the "Para" i think you thought different things, what he mean by Para is if the words stand itself, can be used in the form of "More than, in exes over" as an additional words to explain the "More than, in exes over", and word can be different combination of meaning from other word aswell, roots word. ykwim hopefully.
@wendyoscar31756 сағат бұрын
Good critical mindset bobby, sometimes our brothers too enthusiastic and cross over. Keep it up
@HamadaSolamon-vf6zqКүн бұрын
Thanx , its a good video !
@ha.alamin22 сағат бұрын
God bless you for trying to be as fair as possible bro, but I disagree with your objections. One, you kept saying “para-” only means “in excess” when used in a compound, but parakletos _is_ a compound, so it doesn't really damage the case if he was wrong on that point. Two, you said that only “kleos” means “praised”, not both “kleos” and “kletos”. I think you have more of a case for that objection, since you were unable to find information verifying this, but if I may ask, did you check the specific book/source he cited instead of first searching for other books? It is of course an issue if you couldn't find any books that record that meaning except the one he cited, but if it's a well-regarded book in the field, it should at least be enough to drive further investigation if one has the time for it (you're already Muslim, but maybe for a Christian who's looking to give the Muslim argument a fair consideration). To be fair myself, one simple explanation is that they typoed kleos into kletos. But I'd want to verify with experts. I'd ask them, “someone claimed that kletos could mean X, and he cited this dictionary; is it well-regarded in the field, does it make this claim, is it a typo, is the claim accurate in your view, what's the consensus of the field on whether kletos could mean that, etc.?”. Three, you said that the video author should have mentioned that the book he was quoting mentions, “identified as the spirit of truth”, but I don't see why. He's quoting from a Christian source to show that even some Christians agree with him that parakletos should be transliterated as a name instead of translated as a title, not that Christians agree it's not the spirit of truth (although he already showed a clip of a scholar saying some early Christians thought it was Paul). Of course the (majority of) Christians (today) don't agree with him that the parakletos is not the spirit of truth, the whole discussion is about proving that it's Muhammad. That part was just to make the point that it should be transliterated as a name to build that particular part of the case. He then addresses at least one of the verses referenced by that quote (I was editing this as I go along; this comment originally agreed with you and said he should have addressed the verses referenced in the quote).
@thephilistine44422 сағат бұрын
Just to add to your points, I'm a student of Ancient Greek classics and I looked up the lexicon they cited - the 5th century Heyschii Alexandrini lexicon, and they made no mistake in citing the source, the lexicon does in fact confirm that kletos means the one called by name or the "endoxos" (glorious or praised). Interestingly, the word "endoxos" used by Hesychius shares the same root as "doxa", which some greek translations of the Qur'an use to translate hamd, showing a strong connection between kletos, endoxos and Ahmad. Note that the Hesychii lexicon is considered one of the most important sources for the Greek language and is certainly a reputable source. The reason that some modern sources don't confirm this meaning of praised is because in classical times the word kletos with the meaning of praised/glorified was spelled in two different ways, κλητος and κλειτός. Both spellings were interchangeable and had the same meaning, as confirmed by the esteemed Greek linguist Christian Gottlob Heyne in his critical edition of Homer's Iliad. Modern lexicons favour the latter spelling, which is what ChatGPT is trained on, but in classical lexicons like those of Hesychius (5th century AD) and Didymus Chalcenterus (1st century BC) we can see both spellings had the meaning of praised/glorified.
@ha.alamin21 сағат бұрын
@@thephilistine444 interesting. Thanks for sharing. I really hope Bobby sees your comment.
@AJ-pc9gu10 сағат бұрын
@@thephilistine444 Ok brother I want to learn more. You are saying that the Hesychii Alexandrini lexicon translates Kletos as 1) kaleo 2) endoxos. But chatgpt says "the entry for "κλητός" (kletos) is glossed as "ἐκλεκτός" (eklektos), meaning "chosen" or "selected." This suggests that "κλητός" was understood to mean "called" or "invited," aligning with its usage in classical Greek literature."
@thephilistine4449 сағат бұрын
@AJ-pc9gu ChatGPT does not have access to the lexicon of Hesychius of Alexandria, so it will lie about its contents as it does with any work it cannot access. But if you open the lexicon and send it a screenshot of the word, it can confirm for you that he glosses it as the one called by name, or the endoxos (praised/glorified)
@AJ-pc9gu9 сағат бұрын
@@thephilistine444 Ok this is what I found: "κλητός" ὁ ἐξ ὀνόματος κεκλημένος, ἢ ὃ ϑύρας πλατείας, εἰς ἃς δύναται ζεῦγος βοῶν ἔνδοξος εἰσελθεῖν ἱἐκχλητροί' κλήτορες κλισμοί" ϑρόνοι. ἢ ἀνάκχλιντρα" . So it lists renown with kletos. But is it a verb? Or would you say "beyond-renown" so kinda similar to "much praised".
@дахкилКүн бұрын
My two most favourite channels👍
@lregidor233 сағат бұрын
Thanks for always trying to be honest and unbiased but I think you misunderstood some of the linguistic points. Can you post an update and let us know if you agree you did or pointing out and clarifying further your issues with the original creator’s claims?
@liaf678920 сағат бұрын
20:40 / Sorry but I’m getting so frustrated- you see Kletos is praised. And Kleos is praise. You do see the difference right? And its compounding with para is the most praised. ED. Also he’s not just pulling those definitions out of thin air. He showed you the studies. Also - Asking AI you’re not going to get a more deeper answer. You’re going to get basic answers. Look at the books he referenced please.
@N9TheNoobКүн бұрын
Jazakallahu khairan
@izzohakimi3123Күн бұрын
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "I have five names: I am Muhammad and Ahmad; I am Al-Mahi through whom Allah will eliminate infidelity; I am Al-Hashir who will be the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected there after; and I am also Al-`Aqib (i.e. There will be no prophet after me).Sahih al-Bukhari, 3532
@muhammadnewyorkabdulmalik3296Күн бұрын
Salaam brother Bobby I believe you are saying the same thing as this guy. He is saying that Parra is a juxtaposition to the compound word paracletos. The question is what does the second juxtaposition mean. 23:20
@ahmeddaboor567Күн бұрын
Mohamed ( محمد ) and Ahmed ( أحمد ) the 2 names sharing the same root in Arabic ( حمد ) In Ahmed, the A letter is superlative degree, which means he's gonna be the best one deserves to be praised [ this maybe why Isa - PUBH is talking about the future ] on the other hand, the letter from Mohamed M letter is referring to being an object to the root, which is praised [ and this is why in his live PUBH and in other locations, his name appeared in the Quran Mohammed ]
@BudiHaryanto-c5w19 сағат бұрын
Ahmad , Mehmet , Mahmoud , Hamdani , these are variations of Muhammad , meaning Praiseworthy
@alchannel8949Күн бұрын
Ahmad is a Kind of respect like when the hebrews Say Muhaddim ( im) in the end . so In Arabic is translated as Ahmad instead of Muhammadim
@HassanAbdullahi-ul1dyКүн бұрын
May Allah bless you, big bro Bobby
@nafisazeinelkhalifa519718 сағат бұрын
Bobby lets continue tasawuf knowledge. many people misconception about tasawwoof
@SimpKvao23 сағат бұрын
*AL-BAQARAH 2:146* The people of the Book (Taurah and Injeel) know this (Muhammad) as they know their own sons, but some of them conceal the truth which they themselves knew.
@Fire_I_Сағат бұрын
In Albanian, neighbour country to Greece, "Para" means "infront" and "per para" means towards.
@MrCoin-v2pКүн бұрын
Bobby I recommend you read the book Muhammad, peace be upon him, as mentioned in the books of the Jews and Christians by Abdul Ahad Daoud, formerly known as David Benjamin Keldani, was a professor of theology and a priest of the Chaldean Catholic community. I don't know if it is available in English, but I read it in Arabic and it is interesting.
@JALILAHLatifКүн бұрын
Amazing effort sir very nice and interesting video 👌👍👌👍🙏 May Almighty Allah bless you always and guide you always all the best 🤲🤲🤲👍👌👍♥️♥️♥️
@Om0sadКүн бұрын
Hey Bobby i love your debates with vegans would you be willing to do it again any time soon?!
@mustuhh17 сағат бұрын
But isnt para in paracletos being used in the comppound sense too? so all hes saying is para can have the quantitative meaning of excess; yes in compound, which it is in paracletos, no?
@Desert_KingdomКүн бұрын
"Speak the truth even if it is against yourself,"
@mohammaddoofesh4963Күн бұрын
"Muhammad" is a person who is extensively praiseworthy. "Ahmad" is a person who is more praising (of Allaah) than than others (Eessa).
@BarryKassabКүн бұрын
The accuracy in the Holy Quran is speaking about the fore-coming prophet, and since he was not born yet, the future name is also put into the tense meaning “to be praised” which is Ahmad. As the Muhammad can be translated to be “been praised” and still praised so past continuous
@AroundTheclock-iy3te20 сағат бұрын
Do you know dozens of copies of the holy Koran were found in the sewage in Saudi Arabia by some sanitation workers in 2013. & 2017?
@TheMasterofDisaster4817 сағат бұрын
@@AroundTheclock-iy3te Most likely done by Kristians. They love burning the Quran and vandalizing mosques.
@Jesslyn-d7f23 сағат бұрын
Yess Brother you right ❤ in John 7: 40 Acts 3 : 22 Acts 7: 37
@Jesslyn-d7f22 сағат бұрын
And Song of solomon 5 : 16
@smahi_the_slave_of_ALLAH22 сағат бұрын
To be honest I think your wrong in you analysis, I'm not even that good in Latin but I can see that he's siting sources for his points but you somehow managed to not listen carefully fully to the end without pausing to actually get the Idea, strange how two can watch the same vedio and arrive to a different outcome t 😅
@immu36514 сағат бұрын
Para-kletos in itself is a compund word hence it retains its quantative meaning.
@nothuman1640Күн бұрын
I guess Ahmed is the best translation of the word used in Bible and also it is the name of our beloved prophet Muhammad p.b.u.h but what's interesting is, that name was not used much by others when they addressed him pbuh
@samuelrigaud8821 сағат бұрын
Lie
@conq1234Күн бұрын
ahmed, mohamed, mahmood are all of the same root word of "the blessed one" its just a different way of saying it, if you come to look at the definition of all 3 names you will get the result of "the blessed one" meaning the names are interchangeable.
@Zero43022Күн бұрын
1:26 🙂(ans)👇 Mohammad and Ahmad are two synonyms meaning the same Praised One. I understand why you are asking this question. Simply put, Jesus (pbuh) prophesied it and prophecies are not always clear. As Muhammad (pbuh) predicted doomsday but he did not say when it will happen. In the same way, Jesus (A.S.) said the name Ahmad by the command of Allah so that the faith of the true believers would be tested.
@TheMasterofDisaster48Күн бұрын
Is there a Greek Mislim here in the comments that could tell us who's right, Bobby or MPOM?
@thephilistine444Күн бұрын
I'm a student of Ancient Greek classics and MPOM's claims are correct - I looked up the sources they cite and kletos does indeed mean praised/glorified as confirmed by Hesychius of Alexandria (5th century grammarian). Kleos (praise) is also the noun form of kletos, and both are derived from the verbal from kleo (which is a shorter form of kaleo that Bobby mentions). ChatGPT was incorrect in its response to Bobby, as it claims that kleo is derived from kluo (praise that is heard), when the correct derivation is from kleo (praise that is spoken) though both roots are similar
@thephilistine444Күн бұрын
And regarding para, it does have the meaning of excess in compound words such as Parakletos, which Bobby already agrees with, but he may have gotten slightly confused as he didn't realise Parakletos is a compound word itself, so the meaning is legitimate
@TheMasterofDisaster48Күн бұрын
@@thephilistine444 Thanks.
@l3ll5lКүн бұрын
@@thephilistine444 i too can confirm it from the sources. By the way chat gpt can give you the answers too but you must ask it in a certain manner. Like I heard that kleitos and kletos were spelled interchangeable in classical Greek can you confirm? Then ask for examples. If one wishes to go with this root. But chat gpt is unaware that kletos has the meaning of glorious endoxos already in the dictionaries. It seems chat gpt is not well trained in ancient languages. I realized it in classical Arabic too
@thephilistine444Күн бұрын
@@l3ll5lYes that's correct, in classical times the word kletos was spelt in two different ways, κλητος and κλειτός, both spellings were interchangeable and had the same meaning, as confirmed by the esteemed Greek linguist Christian Gottlob Heyne in his critical edition of Homer's Iliad. Modern lexicons favour the latter spelling, which is what ChatGPT is trained on, but in classical lexicons like those of Hesychius (5th century) and Didymus Chalcenterus (1st century) we can see both spellings had the meaning of praised/glorified.
@And-StopКүн бұрын
"Paraclete" word does not have a single fixed meaning so its difficulty to find an exact equivalent in translation. English translation captures only part of the original word's depth Jesus (AS) describes the Paraclete primarily as Teaching and reminding, Testifying about Jesus (AS), Convicting the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment and Guiding believers into all truth This suggests that the significance of the Paraclete lies not in its etymology or precise definition but in what it does
@ahmaduahmed876023 сағат бұрын
What are you saying? The significance does lie in the meaning. It is a prophecy, the meanings of the words used in any prophecy are very important.
@Anonymous-co3jv4 сағат бұрын
Relaying on the Greek word of the Bible is, in itself, wrong. Since the Prophet , Jesus, himself didn't speak in Greek. It's like taking a word from the Quran, translating it to its best (not exact) translation in Greek, then looking into how miraculous the meaning of the Greek word! Still, that word is not the original, so we will stick to its description rather than it's elaborate meaning.
@alchannel8949Күн бұрын
The word Paraketos also does NOT mean holy spirit
@sugaboss23 сағат бұрын
I don't understand why you insist denying that para when it is combined in a compound word can mean beyond etc. Is para in "parakletos" met the case when it is used in a compound word?
@turkie3577Күн бұрын
23:09 no you are totally right , evidence is the most important thing
@AtikurRahman-lb1ttКүн бұрын
Our last prophet has two names Ahmad(means he praises) this name is called because Muhammad (saw) used to praise Allah and peoples around him. Muhammad(means he is praised)this name is called because he is praised in this life and will be in the hereafter too.He praises Allah so,to Allah he is Ahmad.On the other hand he is praised by people, so,to people he is Muhammad. But only Allah knows the exact one.
@Kales-75Күн бұрын
Alhamdullah for your recovery brother Bobby
@asadbakr4707Күн бұрын
assalamu alaykum brother. brother when learning a language, especially an old one, like arabic, hebrew or greek, many people advice using books and trusted resources, the older the better, because there would be less change to the word, and more people who are experts and scholars in the language to ask, so when they were making this greek lexicon, their research would be more creditable, the greek lexicon they mention is according to the blue letter bible: "Originally published in 1841", thus their claims would be more creditable than a website, hope this helps
@agnesfox8349Күн бұрын
WHEN THE TERM GOD'S "HOLY SPIRIT" OR EVEN THE "SPIRIT OF GOD" IS MENTIONED ANYWHERE IN APPROXIMATELY 2500 YEARS OF SCRIPTURE (BOTH OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS) IT IS NEVER REFERENCING "A MORTAL MAN" - - ANYWHERE - - (Read that statement over again.) I also feel that it is my duty to mention that Jesus stated that blaspheming the Holy Spirit is an "unforgiveable sin". Note: Stating that Mohammed who was a mass murderer, pedophile, slave owner, and liar about Jesus' crucifixion - is the "Holy Spirit" is blaspheming the Holy Spirit.
@ahmaduahmed876022 сағат бұрын
Look you appear confused, stop embarrassing yourself. Your fictitious holy spirit is different, a supposed god, not the same as Parakletos, nor the Spirit of Truth. Go back to the Greeks and ask them what's the meaning of Paraklete, Paracleite, or Parakletos, it's their language. It is a compound word. Do ask them pls. The Biblical translators hide the meaning and left it in the Greek form. Now ask the Greeks what's the meaning.
@uzairfaruqui4886Күн бұрын
Agree with what you said at the end. That is a lot of commentary for a word (Paraclete) that might just be a mistranslation from the original text. The video would just make so much more sense if it started from the other end, then went into the rest of the textual context and then maybe talked about the possible meaning of paraclete as a small bit to it. Good research nonetheless 👏.
@zubaidaperoo705423 сағат бұрын
Bobby, what I can say about the name Ahmad is that the root letters are khaa; meem and dahl in both the name Ahmad and make Mohamad. Meaning of both names are similar. I learned that that both are names of Prophet Mohamed SAW
@beliverfaith476618 сағат бұрын
Here's answer from AI Bobby : In Islamic belief, both names honor the Prophet, though they may carry slightly different connotations. However, people named Ahmad or Muhammad are often named in respect of the Prophet, and in daily use, the two are sometimes treated as equivalent
@mianhealthcarecenter5411Күн бұрын
In the Assumption of Moses, Prophet Moses mention as Holy spirit as well as Advocate. So this means prophet Muhammad is the advocate ( Paraclete ) same as the prophet Moses is the advocate mentioned in the Assumption of Moses. ❤ If any one have book the assumption of Moses in original form plz share link.
@davidm113Күн бұрын
Surah Al- Ikhlaas 112 refutes the claims of the Nicaean creed. By Allah SWT. Ahmad is another name for Muhammed (PBUH).
@MSAHNWN5EMNSSSAKYКүн бұрын
Prophet Muhammad is mentioned by his name Muhammad four times The Other times he has mentioned is without his name as for Ahmed yes he is mentioned as Ahmed because one of his names is Ahmed if I am not wrong given to him by his mother and Muhammad was given to him by his grandfather
@agnesfox8349Күн бұрын
Mohammed is not mentioned anywhere in scripture because he is an obvious false prophet who even lied about Jesus' crucifixion. Any legitimacy of Mohammed being a true prophet of God is thrown right out the window with his outlandish lie that Jesus was not crucified. Why? For two reasons: 1.) Because he lied against God Himself. Think about that for just a minute. God sends His son into the world for the salvation of the world and Moe stated Jesus' crucifixion did not happen? Are you kidding me? 2.) Mohammed, no doubt denied billions of his followers over the centuries a true relationship with Christ. There were men like John, Peter, Paul, and others who walked, talked, and knew Jesus personally who wrote gospels and epistles proclaiming the word of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection, who allowed themselves to be tortured, imprisoned. exiled, and martyred for Christ. PETER, ONE OF JESUS' BEST FRIENDS ASKED TO BE CRUCIFIED UPSIDE DOWN BECAUSE HE DID NOT FEEL WORTHY TO DIE IN THE SAME MANNER THAT JESUS DID. I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT THESE VERY ENLIGHTENED MEN WOULD ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE TORTURED, IMPRISONED, EXILED AND MARTYRED FOR A FAIRY TALE. There was a FORMAL TRIAL BEFORE PILATE (THE ROMAN GOVERNOR OF JUDAEA) where thereafter Jesus was arrested, imprisoned and tortured all the way to his crucifixion by roman soldiers and officers. Would not also any of the following people have immediately told others that this was not Jesus on the cross? (These people were at the foot of the cross): Mary, Jesus' mother, John, Mary of Cleophus, Mary Magdalene. All events were closely monitored by friends, family, roman officials and authorities, as well as the pharisees who made absolutely sure that Jesus was crucified. Why did Moe state this? My opinion for one or all of the following reasons: 1) He was a mega narcisstic man who couldn't stand anyone not following him, hence his atrocious edicts to have those that didn't follow him taxed or killed. He probably knew that Jesus would be a threat to him hence this outlandish lie. 2) He was inspired by satan to state this. Jesus is satan's arch enemy. 3) A combination of both. Satan took advantage of Moe's huge ego, and Moe took the bait to lie about Jesus. A lie which, I am sure, Moe regrets for all eternity.
@mimianwar5448Күн бұрын
Muhammad and Ahmed comes from the same name Hamid but with a different meaning Muhammad for people he is the praiseworthy Ahmed the ultimate praiser of God
@muratsahin224613 сағат бұрын
The Jews asked Jesus this question in the Temple. It is said that a great prophet will come after you. Will this great prophet come from the lineage of Isaac or Ishmael? They asked. Jesus replied, "You expect me to tell you lies that will please you, but I will not do that. The great prophet you are talking about will come from the lineage of Ishmael, not Isaac." Upon this, The Jews became angry and tried to stone him in the Temple, but Allah blinded their eyes and they stoned each other instead of Jesus inside the Temple.
@agnesfox834913 сағат бұрын
Jesus never stated such a thing in the Bible
@UnlockedANDunleashedКүн бұрын
Ahmad in the gospels, mohammed in the quran, and uheed in the torah, i guess its just the aramaic, arabic and hebrew versions of the name, i could be wrong though but ive always known this information since i was a kid and it makes the most sense
@samuelrigaud8821 сағат бұрын
Two different name
@UnlockedANDunleashed6 сағат бұрын
@samuelrigaud88 what do you know about semitic languages outsider?
@samuelrigaud886 сағат бұрын
@@UnlockedANDunleashed i know you muslims are trying to force your false prophet into the bible desperately ☝🏾
@mochekoufi8143Күн бұрын
According to one explanation I came across, if you say Mohamed, then it would have meant that he's already been sent
@erdinc7339 сағат бұрын
You should not take chatgpt as a valid resource.
@sulo_727Сағат бұрын
Does anyone have the name of the recitation at the start?
@astrike3355-jd9pm23 сағат бұрын
The 'spirit of truth' is better explaination with the assumption spirit is infer to as prophet as explicitly mention in bible.
@achmadijazi163222 сағат бұрын
Bro Kletos can be mean endoxos, (glory,,praise) the evidence already there
@MSAHNWN5EMNSSSAKYКүн бұрын
In the the Quran it is mentioned that Prophet Isa mentioned Prophet Muhammad as Ahmed Ahmad is basically another name for Prophet Muhammad Prophet Muhammad was given 10 names by Allah
@sub7se7en21 сағат бұрын
What i was told is that Muhammad was a name that was never used by mankind until it was given to our prophet pbuh. So that name would have been unknown to people before him. If it became known through a prophecy then people could have used the name. Ahmad is similar in meaning and is a name of Muhammad PBUH, so that was used in the prophecy.
@samuelrigaud8821 сағат бұрын
What prophecy
@letmetalk224021 сағат бұрын
@@samuelrigaud88 Jesus called him "the spirit of truth'.
@sub7se7en21 сағат бұрын
@samuelrigaud88 the one where he foretold Muhammad PBUH. Its what this video is about.