Boeing is in big trouble! Nobody buys 787-10. Here’s why

Boeing is in big trouble! Nobody buys 787-10. Here’s why
===
#boeing #fligavia #aviation #boeing787 #boeing787dreamliner
===
00:00 Intro
00:35 787-10 orders
02:08 Competitiveness
04:03 Design
05:47 -10ER version
07:09 Boeing’s plans
===
Boeing is in big trouble! Nobody buys 787-10. Here’s why
Since its announcement, the Boeing 7 8 7 Dream Liner has been a huge success with a high number of orders, surpassing 1,700. With that outstanding achievement, it became the best-selling wide-body aircraft in history. However, when looking closely at the versions of this aircraft, we can see an extremely significant difference in their number of orders. The 7 8 7 dash 10 is lagging behind compared to the other two.
Boeing is in big trouble! Nobody buys 787-10. Here’s why.What’s going on? Why is the 7 8 7 dash 10 so difficult to sell? What moves does Boeing make to attract the market? Let’s find out!
Boeing is in big trouble! Nobody buys 787-10. Here’s whyThe 7 8 7 dash 10 is the youngest but largest member of the 7 8 7 family. According to Boeing, the dash 10 can accommodate up to 336 rows of passengers in a 2-class configuration. With faster travel speeds and a more modern, forward-looking design, this aircraft is destined to replace the Boeing triple 7-200 and 200ER. The triple 7 series is one of the company's best-selling products, they have sold nearly 600 units since their launch. However, they also show signs of aging. The oldest produced ones are almost 30 years old, they are too fit to be replaced.

[@amitaipalmon428]

Boeing is busy trying to fit non-fitting elements together, while Airbus is releasing well designed planes , coming to market way before Boeing. Boeing needs a RESTART or a SHUTDOWN.

[@edwardwilcox6606]

I don`t see the B787-9 as a competitor to A350-900 but I do see B787-10 as an overlaping rather compromised rival. I see Boeings thinking in that any sale for it is one less for AB perhaps rather like AB`s A330-Neo & it`s fight against B787. Boeing -9 is an incredible aircraft with huge sales to back it up, it`s found it`s niche perfectly as has A350-900. With hindsight I think Boeing should have explored a modest stretch over the -10 & gone all in on a bigger wing & taller undercarriage to accomodate the larger fan diameters that will be needed for better efficiency rather than B777X & it`s standard alloy hull. I mention `hindsight` because you could not foresee the damaging delays with B777X anymore than what Covid would bring about. A B787-`12` would have afformentioned wingbox, wing, undercarriage, stretch, & perhaps RR UltraFan for an aircraft with 350-380 passengers capacity decent fuel load & what could be game-changing range. Just a dream perhaps but I believe this route had it been envisaged could have been another `niche sweetspot` as -9 has been. Regardless I think B787-9 & -10 are crying out for more efficient engines, this would keep those lines going for decades, Boeing need to talk to RR!

[@vladilenkalatschev4915]

Nobody wants this aircraft but almost 300 units have already been built. What a bull…

[@rscott2247]

I think the 787-10 is just awaiting certification as there is a fair number of firm orders for it ?

[@turval1954]

I am flabbergasted of the information provided. It does not specify the issue and compare it with Airbus. This will show the difference of the two big airplane builders.

[@alanwood4968]

Are you . People have seen and heard about mismanagement and lies, planes falling out of the sky no adequate compensation bolts not fitted and not the right make. To much money going to management and investors. That is why and people do not want to fly boeing and asking when booking is it a boeing if so i don't want it. You cannot have these faults and just brush it under the carpet or wave money about to encourage people that to people outside America is a slap in the face.

[@user-so4bu7ys6h]

Sorry not good points. The key is "range". Without the enough MTOW, the 787-10 even fly the routes of more than 12 hours can not carry the max passenger payload.

[@MrBubba311]

Boeing appears hell bent on self destruction.

[@kevinrichard100]

Why buy this when you can buy Airbus?

[@kenphillips7594]

Why no orders? It's a Boeing, simple.

[@soumenchakraborty2450]

Their 747s were good though, that’s about it.

[@opuadaonyemelukwe6865]

the 787 is the best selling widebody of ALL TIME, followed by the 777 and then the 747. Boeing dominates widebodies.

[@jocelynharris-fx8ho]

Dreamliner? How about NIGHTMAREliner !!! If the employees of a company won't use their own company's product, then why would I ? Boeing employees have gone on record saying that they would NOT fly the 787 under any circumstances. Now a whistleblower has come forward to say that the plane could break apart in mid-air !!!😮 Sorry, but when I travel, I don't want to have to pack a parachute in my carry-on luggage. First, Boeing needs to clean out it's executive ranks and reinstate the quality control standards that made them the industry leader. They KNOW what the problem is but they're in denial.

[@eduardodaquiljr9637]

Saudia and Air Rabia has it,perfect flexible wing others planes don't have.

[@jerrypolverino6025]

I downloaded an app online so I can book tickets without Boeing aircraft.

[@andymaurice7693]

Tooooo pro Aibus message... In General 787 has done circles around A350 and A330 sales

[@jamillikan]

Boeing is trash.

[@EinChris75]

0:40... yeah the 787 can accommodate up to 336 *ROWS* of passengers. Absolutely.

[@FLIGAVIA]

my bad, thanks for reminding me!

[@aryaansrivastava3756]

Which Airlines has Both A350-1000 and 787-10, Qantas Airlines!

[@georgeburns7251]

Boeing could always go into making electric cars?

[@owenlaprath4135]

... self driving? With their own steering wheel override, like the 737 Max with its MCAS? Ahhhh .... mmmmm .... (careful duck and cover, and running away...)

[@Mercy_Pants]

-10 is underwinged and lacks range

[@dcsyd16]

They could make this with a folding wing tips to get this better lift Although they should just get dedicated team from the from Boeing & FAA to get the 777x to market Whether old Boeing employees like it or not, we need Boeing to rebound to be freed up to launch the 777, 797 and 757 replacements And also to be readied to make an f15 replacement. Any one suggesting Boeing should just quit should get the brains checked. The dodgy management is gone and a governance regime is being re-established It’s time to stop bashing Boeing and help get back into a successful stance. The world security relies on them being successful

[@up2tech]

Sounds like Boeing is copying Douglas. Md-10 or 11… let’s just expand passengers. Let’s save money! It’s all on a Lego anyway! 😂

[@eleventy-seven]

Its a Boeing that's years late getting approved. Junk.

[@richjames2540]

Much like the A350-1000 which does not sell.

[@evonrn2000]

Great Company, but *Bad Leadership🐽*

[@t8polestarcyan22]

Originally Air New Zealand have ordered 787-10s to replace their aging 777-200ERs.

[@daklakdigital3691]

AS A SENIOR MEMBER OF A COMPANY I WAS ONE OF SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO DECIDED NO STAFF WILL FLY BOEING REGARDLESS OF URGENCY.

[@edwardwilcox6606]

Any car journey your staff take will be more dangerous than flying a Boeing aircraft. Simple statistics will tell you that.

[@daklakdigital3691]

@@edwardwilcox6606 YOU HAVEN'T A CLUE WHERE WE DRIVE (IN THE COUNTRYSIDE). BUT YOU COULD TRY YOUR THEORY OUT OF THE FAMILIES OF THE 346 PAX MURDERED IN THE 2 MCAS CRASHES ENGINEERED BY BOEING. I HAVE A FEELING THEIR OPINIONS DIFFER.

[@edwardwilcox6606]

While you obviously have a personal grievance with Boeing I see no link with your employees safety & them flying a Boeing verses them taking a car journey into your place of work when it's proven that a car journey whether it be in the country, a city, or on the Interstate is statistically FAR more dangerous.

[@daklakdigital3691]

@@edwardwilcox6606 YOU, I ASSUME, REFER TO AMERICAN DRIVING RECORDS. THE AIR SAFETY NUMBER DATA IS INCOMPLETE. AS FOR BOEING IT APPEARS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT SHARES OUR OPINION OF BOEING PRODUCTS AIRWORTHINESS. BUT THE CAUSE OF DEATH OF 346 PEOPLE IS TOTALLY UNEXCUSABLE. THE COMPANIES NEW POLICY IS TO PERMIT EMPLOYEES CHOOSE FIRST THERE OR NON-BOEING OPEN ARRIVAL. OUR EARLIER SCHEME WAS ANY AIRCRAFT. PERSONALLY I HAVE FOND MEMORIES OF THE DC-3.

[@faranger]

The Russians are building better Airframes.😢

[@michaelauger8077]

What in the hell is Boeing doing, hire a bunch of idiots lately?

[@owenlaprath4135]

I worked there! Those asking questions and making improvement suggestions get fired. The idiots get promoted and make tons of money. I have considered job applications there a waste of time for 3 decades now. It matters not anymore, because I am 60 now, and disabled after 2 heart attacks and a stroke. Large companies in USA can go to hell, as far as I am concerned. Maybe, if they all die, it will crash housing, and bring rent and house prices down! I really wish Boeing and Microsoft the worst!

[@michaelauger8077]

@@owenlaprath4135 I retired way too early. They don’t want to fix anything or improve, just want to count their money. I feel your pain!

[@mr8akash]

I can bring more quality to your videos. so viewers can engage more and enjoy your video visually. I'm working with some growing channels. and they are getting many views. they also make content on aviation like yours. so I can bring those qualities to your videos so that you can grow more. how can I reach you, to elaborate more? and you can get a free demo to justify my words.

[@vashonm]

A350-1000 has horrible sales also lol

[@edwardwilcox6606]

Keep-up, A350-1000 has had some great orders recently & will in the future as it will replace many B777-300ER`s as they age.

[@warmike]

@@edwardwilcox6606 that's if Boeing certification woes continue. Which may well be the case.

[@edwardwilcox6606]

@@warmike If the B777X turns out to be reliable & in turn successful I don`t think it will impact A350-1000 too much anyway, sure there will be airlines that need that extra size, but most won`t need it as the AB product hits the`sweetspot` in it`s category & for it`s price & efficiency.

[@rscott2247]

​@@edwardwilcox6606I can't see any airline looking to retire their 777's any time soon, especially the 300er.

[@edwardwilcox6606]

I think it`s already happening with very recent orders placed for -1000 version. Ok these orders are a modest start admitedly, but will gather apace as airlines start to realise the considerable advantage the newer aircraft have in efficiency. There are many 200 series to replace, & while it`s true 300ER`s are not fully mature for some time I think you`ll see many replacements happen before time.

[@stuartlee6622]

STAY OFF BOEING!!!!!

[@rscott2247]

I'd fly on 717, 747, 757, 767, 777, and 737 non-Max any day of the week !