As a CFII (as well as a professional corporate pilot ), these video seminars are truly excellent. I would suggest holds and arcs for future topic material
@Boldmethod5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Michael!
@ChiDraconis5 жыл бұрын
@@Boldmethod I concur; With an interest in how the person whom is not by nature attracted to machinery and equipment relies; *Seems to rely* on _push button automation_ rather than what is way too easily mistaken «decisions» based on feel • The recent disaster event which is getting flurry of non-informed work seems to be they were reading the manual when they should have been flying the air-frame
@marknovak93104 жыл бұрын
This is by far the best discussion I have ever seen/heard on procedure turns!! Glad I can across your youtube site..
@scarpaz2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic refresher material. I can't believe you make this available freely. Thanks!
@YaofuZhou3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for producing such well illustrated tutorials! Safe flights to you!
@abbieamavi4 жыл бұрын
*these videos are amazing, and some of my favorites for studying. Was so confused about completing a Procedure Turn on my lesson 2 days ago, but this video is making me feel ready for tonight to try it all again! thank you* :)
@in2flying Жыл бұрын
I'm studying for my instrument now and absolutely love your content. Ty.
@rcbif1014 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this. Not sure if they cover it more later, but its the first thing I've come accross in Kings course I was not satisfied with.
@WabbitWay2 жыл бұрын
superb!!! One of the best of YT. and thank you for not having annoying bee bop musak in the background
@williesturner9398 Жыл бұрын
Excellent seminar. I learned so much with a better understanding of how to fly these procedures.
@Matthew7.75 жыл бұрын
Excellent video going into details. Thank you guys!
@kityiu48345 жыл бұрын
Thank you for these videos. Keep em coming!
@BrandonBaunach3 жыл бұрын
I wish this guy was my dad so I could just ask him questions all the time
@nickfunk58045 жыл бұрын
Excellent instructional video!
@zachheilman7845 жыл бұрын
Interestingly enough, for the Kalispell ILS approach, a NOTAM lists the NDB as out of service. So you'd have to use RNAV or DME to know when you reach the start of the PT.
@Boldmethod5 жыл бұрын
Zach - We've found that situation several times. In tonight's show, that's the case as we fly into North Bend for the ILS RWY 04...
@vv-cv6ud3 жыл бұрын
Excellent excellent excellent !!!
@brunogt1982 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic thank you for the help 👏🏼
@danreed6894 Жыл бұрын
Instead of overshooting the VOR to intercept the outbound course, why not execute a PT such as a teardrop at the VOR in order to stay inside the protected area of the published hold? @27:20 Also, isn’t it depicted as a required PT at the VOR?
@mohamedalbuzeidi35394 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation , thank you .
@Mikinct2 жыл бұрын
Great Video, ran this approach in the msfs2020 sim many times, a lot of fun and you learn a lot. Question, I've tried this approach without the use of my GPS, simply using VOR headings. But how would a pilot know how far he is from this runway, in this example its Runway 17. Using VOR/DME its tells me when I'm 4 miles "From the actual VOR itself" not the runway. This messed up a few of my approaches because I started my 4 mile adding flaps and gear down and I came in too high and fast. When I did it again using GPS, that was accurate, it told me I was exactly 4 miles from runway 17 and I was able to coordinate slowing he plane altitude and speed successfully. Just wonder how did pilots do this in bad weather without GPS?
@desireercortez2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Thank you for sharing
@abrahamwarep24744 жыл бұрын
Made it so easy thanks!
@AaronWbirdman Жыл бұрын
Fabulous!
@Wiredupez2 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys
@chrisberg49525 жыл бұрын
This keeps me sharp.
@jakew98873 жыл бұрын
Great Video. Thanks
@e.d.40694 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the app you’re using at 28:20?
@omarijoseph31895 жыл бұрын
this is something i'm clueless on and need good help with, on how to choose the correct SID/STAR, how to read it and fly it...
@Ridejumpfly Жыл бұрын
Can you please explain further reference 11:45 do whatever you want to get on final as long as your in the protected area?
@DiogoMaxGamer4 жыл бұрын
Amazing video, thank you! At 30:42 you talk about wind at altitude. How am I supposed to figure out the wind without modern avionics?
@julietdavis17963 жыл бұрын
foreflight subscription, or AWC on your phone's internet browser does the trick
@andrewmack48304 жыл бұрын
thank you. Very helpful.
@alexanderpeters94443 жыл бұрын
Can you look at the VOR 15 into KMKT? Let's say you're coming in from the NE at 3500 ft, and you cross the VOR (which is the IAF). Even though there is a holding pattern over the VOR, from this video I would assume you would only need to start a turn outbound to start the procedure turn, and you could completely ignore making any holding entry maneuvers? This also assumes you're flying with just traditional VOR equipment, and for training purposes, this scenario disregards the more likely scenario of vectors to final from ATC. Also, you said as soon as you cross the PT fix, which in this case is the MKT VOR, you're immediately offered protection (even if you're not on the protected side. Where can you find these protection limits?
@user-uz6wn3bg9k4 жыл бұрын
I learned a lot thanks sir
@Gambalix0073 жыл бұрын
First of all thanks for your excellent videos and explanations. Truly helpful and clear! I would like to ask a question about this particular video at 27:11! When you show as an example the entry on the procedure from roughly track 142M, in Europe I believe we cannot do what you have drawn. (please, correct me if I'm wrong...). Because in this case we are not approaching the VOR through the direct entry area for procedure turns (in accordance with ICAO 8168 Vol 1, would be 30 degrees each side of the outbound track which in turn would be between tracks 016-30 = 346 and 016+30 = 046). In this case we would have to entry the holding which assuming you have drawn track 142, we can choose teardrop or parallel, and only then we can proceed to the outbound track. Would you agree with this, or is this something that is not applicable in the US ? Many thanks.
@Kevlux863 жыл бұрын
That tricky question about getting blown out by wind presents such an odd situation: how do you know you’re too far out: GPS/DME, which means you’ve had GPS/DME to fly the PT, which means you would have used it to start the PT in the first place.
@Wiredupez2 жыл бұрын
Why can’t lead the turn over the vor Instead of flying past it and turn back towards your outbound?
@aarontrueblood43403 жыл бұрын
The GPI ILS procedure has changed since this video. It's my home airport
@YaofuZhou3 жыл бұрын
Studying this in August 2021 - has SAK NDB been decommissioned since the making of this video? I could not find it on the ILS/LOC 02 at KGPI any more (~46:00)
@gendaminoru31953 жыл бұрын
They'l most often clear you to an intermediate fix with a crossing altitude and tell you to expect vectors where you'll be put on a 30° intercept to final. And I would not give credit for a holding pattern for currency by way of executing a procedure turn. We need to see timing standard rate turns proficiency demonstrated as well as knowledge of a proper entry. I did not hear an answer to the entry to a DEM arc at places other than defined fixes. I'm thinking maybe not if there are varying safe altitudes in the sector and that you would ask for vectors instead to the intermediate fix
@markhathaway94565 жыл бұрын
I'm curious if GPS is good enough for the FAA to ground all the VOR and DMEs to simplify the life of pilots.
@asfalling45345 жыл бұрын
always have a back up
@scottfranco19623 жыл бұрын
Jeezzz if they bother you don't use them. The short answer is that the FAA assumes someone somewhere still has the old equipment and can use the old approaches. They have plenty of incentive to decommission older navaids. Having your instructor give you DME approaches when you have a GNS 430 or similar is another problem. PS the authors of this video have a good page on the subject: www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/navigation/the-faa-is-shutting-down-308-vors/
@markhathaway94563 жыл бұрын
@@asfalling4534 So your car is rolling along and you step on the brakes to stop from hitting a car in front of you. The brakes don't work. What do you do? What's your backup?
@markhathaway94563 жыл бұрын
@@scottfranco1962 I don't fly, so I don't use them. Should the FAA be basing its design of the air system based on what somebody used to use 50 or 100 years ago? Seems backward.
@scottfranco19623 жыл бұрын
@@markhathaway9456 This statement seems to conflict with your last statement about backup (as in VOR is backup for GPS). Anyways, yes, the FAA VOR system is around 50 years old. I don't think the majority of airlines use nor much care about the GPS system, even now. They don't have to. Airliners fly airways defined by VORs, and land using ILS systems. The FAA cares far more about airliners than us FLIBs. The article I cited above giving the criteria for keeping VORs dovetails nicely with the continued support of airline VOR service, so its going to be around for a while.
@thomheg2 жыл бұрын
Love this video, but I have a question at 30:37. The chart says to turn at 10 NM from VOR. In the video it turns at 8,2 DME. Is that correct procedure, or should you go further out?
@Ridejumpfly Жыл бұрын
The chart says to remain within 10 miles. If you started your turn at 10 you would be outside the published procedure.
@scottfranco19623 жыл бұрын
Those marker beacons are disappearing fast. I can't find any on local approaches anymore. Kinda sad.... I miss the beep beep beep on approaches, its like finding an old friend.
@SuperEddietv3 жыл бұрын
I wish we could have picked a different VOR. My patriotic brain is twitching every time I hear "liberal"...hahaha I wonder if the taxpayer is going to pay for my flight training?1 Oh, thats right, they are doing away with flying for the peasants. ;)