Book Unboxing: FALSE CALIPHATE

[@Shafayat124]

Really missing the seerah series. Please continue them sheikh.

[@no.964]

me too

[@pakistankamatlabkya5633]

The book needs to be renamed as FALSE ACCUSATIONS and how to peddle slavery to the status quo.

[@danraf1562]

-Hizb doesn't reject Ahad Hadith -Doesn't reject Adab al-Qabr -Doesn't say there is no Jumu'a prayer without Khalifah. Infact the hanafis hold the view no jumua prayer without khalifah. -The method of bringing back Khilafah of the Prophet saw isn't the method of Saudi loyalist in writing some baseless books.

[@mewzi]

as long as you're a hizb with aqeedah not of sahabah, it's from the 72 sects

[@danraf1562]

@@mewzi the hizb has the aqida of the sahaba. The hasan hadith about 72 groups/religions speaks about groups that left Islam like the qadianis and batinis according to the correct understanding of it.

[@danraf1562]

@Quran and Sunnah "there are not enough groups that left Islam" isn't an Argument since the dunia isn't over. If you counted some of those you would reach more than half already. On the other Hand there are more than 72 Muslim groups and more than 72 groups who have Innovation and seperated themselves from the Khalifah and the jama'a. Therefore Hizb is part of the saved group. They don't reject ahad and use it in furoo' like the majority of the ulema of ahlusunna. Whereas traditionally only some imamia, dhaheria and hashawiya would take ahad on itself AS a proof in the foundations of the 'aqida. Even Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qayyim and Ibn Hajjar don't follow this opinion. Since they further require qara’in like ijma' and ayat of the quran. Therefore rejecting a khabar wahid without a legitimate/valid reason is fisq but not kufr. The hizb also rejects greek influenced kalam and doesn't apply philosophy like ibn taymiyyah when it comes to the attributes of the most High alhamdulillah. The problem with some Salafis lies in the matter that they priorize secondary aspects of 'aqida and fiqh over the basics of the deen and they don't aknowledge legitimate khilaf where it is due. Ironically some looser takfiries (daesh) proclaimed a false bogus calipahte in syria and iraq and yet their salafi brethern wine about tertiaries issues with the hizb. Maybe salafies should first clear their secondary 'aqida controversies like takfir al 'adhir (excommunicatiom of the excuser), fana an-nar (finality of the punishment in hellfire), al-'Udhr bil Jahl/ ignorance if it excuses major shirk and so on. Good luck with that! May Allah t unite the umma upon haqq and a future rightly guided khilafah. Ameen.

[@MLECHHkiller]

لعنت اللہ علی الکاذبین Hanafis have never rejected Juma prayer without khalifah everyone prays

[@danraf1562]

@@MLECHHkiller yes Allahs curse upon the liars. Ameen. This opinion exists with the hanafis that for a valid jumua prayer a khalifah is needed. Is jummua prayer valid without a Caliph (Muslim ruler) in the Hanafi Madhab? In a Nutshell: The Hanafi school developed significant expertise on all matters relating to politics, power and institutions given how a number of Muslim empires (eg Ottomans, Mughals etc) adopted their views. According to the Hanafis praying jummua in congregation is not permitted without the Caliph or his representative as was practiced for over a millennium in Islamic history. Contemporary Hanafis allow jummua without a caliph and recommend praying zuhr afterwards. Background Contemporary Hanafis permit it, however suggest performance of the zuhr prayer afterwards. How do the Hanafis justify this? According to the Hanafi school, having a Sultan is one of the twelve conditions required for the jummua prayer. Without this it cannot be established as they argue: لا يَجُوزُ إقامَتُهَا إلّا لِلسُّلْطَانِ أَوْ لِمَنْ أَمَرَهُ السُّلْطَانُ It is not allowed to establish jummua prayer except by a Sultan, or through someone who has been given authority by the Sultan. They argue jummua prayers was instituted in Medina by the Prophet (saw) and his companions and not in Mecca even though the individual and group prayers were performed in Mecca. Medina was dar al-Islam (the home of Islam) where Islam flourished fully without restriction - importantly with an imam or caliph as head of state. Furthermore, the Prophet (saw) is also reported to have said "There is no jummua without the Imam" and announced: O people! Repent to Allah before you die. Hasten to do good deeds before you become preoccupied. Uphold the relationship that exists between you and your Lord by remembering Him a great deal and by giving a great deal of charity in secret and openly. (Then) you will be granted provision and Divine support, and your condition will improve. Know that Allah has enjoined Friday upon you in this place of mine, on this day, in this month, in this year, until the Day of Resurrection. Whoever abandons it, whether during my lifetime or after I am gone, whether he has a just or an unjust imam (ruler), whether he takes it lightly or denies, may Allah cause him to lose all sense of tranquillity and contentment, and may He not bless him in his affairs. Indeed, his prayer will not be valid, his Zakat will not be valid, his Hajj will not be valid, his fasting will not be valid, and his righteous deeds will not be accepted, until he repents. Whoever repents, Allah will accept his repentance. No woman should be appointed as Imam over a man, no Bedouin should be appointed as Imam over a Muhajir, no immoral person should be appointed as Imam over a (true) believer, unless that is forced upon him and he fears his sword or whip. (Ibn Majah 1:343; Bayhaqi 3:244) The companion Abu Abdullah (ra) made a similar statement. مسلم بن يسار قال: كان أبو عبد الله رجل من الصحابة يقول: الزكاة والحدود والفيء والجمعة إلى السلطان Muslim ibn Yasar said: Abu Abdillah, a sahabi, would say: "Zakat, Hudud, Fay (spoils) and Jummua are for the Sultan." (Fath al-Bari, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani) Ibn Abi Shaybah narrates similar words from some of the Tabi'in, e.g., namely, Abdullah ibn Muhayriz, Ata al-Khurasani and Qatadah ibn Di'amah. Jummua, like the penal codes, collection of zakat, judicial resolution of disputes etc all apply in dar al-Islam and not in dar al-kufr or dar al-harb. Further trade should cease along with other social activities - only The Imam ensures this. The jurist Nawawi summed this up well: "Since we stated that selling and buying transaction on that time is forbidden, then other kind of transactions, manufacturing activities, and other activities that busying one and preventing him from going to the mosque to perform the Friday prayer are also forbidden." (Al Majmu' 4:500) It is the caliph who appoints those leading the prayers, usually governors or head of a city, and the khutbah is done in his name. It is why the Hanafis did not permit jummua to be performed in villages as there would usually be no representative of the Imam at such a local level. Hanafi scholars generally note: "The Friday prayer is based on the permission of ulul-amr (authority). If there is no ulul-amr, the Friday prayer is not fard... On the other hand, some Ahnaf say Muslims can appoint a person among themselves and perform the Friday prayer if there is no ulul-amr." (Elmalili Hamdi Yazir, Hak Dini Qur'an Dili, VII, 4983) Badr ad-Deen al-Ayni: قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ ابن المنذر: مَضَتِ السُّنَّةُ بِأَنَّ الَّذِي يُقِيمُ الْجُمُعَةَ السُّلْطَانُ، أَوْ مَنْ قَامَ بِهَا بِأَمْرِ السُّلْطَانِ "Abu Bakr ibn al-Mundhir said: (for a long time) it has been accepted that the one who hold the jummua is the Sultan or an appointed person by the Sultan … " (Badr al-Deen al-Ayni, Umdat al-Qari, Vol. 6, p. 276.) Whilst Imam al-Kasani (ra) stated in his Bada'i al-Sana'i that the condition of having the Sultan's permission is to avoid any possible disputes and arguments, because the Friday (jumu'a) prayer is offered in a large congregating and to lead such a massive congregation in prayer is indeed a great privilege; hence, it may lead those who like to be in the limelight into competing and arguing with one another to acquire the post of leading the Friday prayer. For this reason, appointing the right person to lead the Friday prayer was left to the discretion of the Sultan, so that he may appoint whomever he feels fit for this esteemed position. As a result, there would be no dispute, for others would be forced into obeying the Sultan and may even fear his punishment. (Bada'i al-Sana'i, 1/261) Imam al-Qurtubi said: قَدْ قَالَ أَبُو حَنِيفَةَ :… وَاِشْتَرَطَ فى وُجُوبِ الْجُمُعَةِ وَاِنْعِقَادُهَا الْمِصْرُ الْجَامِعُ وَالسُّلْطَانُ الْقَاهِرُ "Abu Hanifa … stipulated for the establishment of jummua the center city and the powerful Sultan." (Tafsir al-Qurtubi, Vol. 9, P. 102.) Imam ibn Rushd said a similar statement in his book (Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa nihayat al-Muqtasid, Vol. 1, pp. 169-170) In contemporary practice, since the demise of Islamic rule, the caliphate and sultanates, Hanafis recommend the jummua is done and as a precaution 4 rakats are prayed straight after as the zuhr prayer - ensuring that should the jummua not be accepted, the zuhr is discharged. The other schools of law disagreed with this position and permitted jummua prayers without the caliph or his representative. Conclusion The Hanafi school developed significant expertise on all matters relating to politics, power and institutions given how a number of Muslim empires (eg Ottomans, Mughals etc) adopted their views. According to the Hanafis praying jummua in congregation is not permitted without the Caliph or his representative as was practiced for over a millennium in Islamic history. Contemporary Hanafis allow jummua without a caliph and recommend praying zuhr afterwards. References Marghanani, Hidayah, Kitab us Salaat, Bab Salaatul Jummu'ah Ibn Abidin, Radd al-Muhtar, Kasani, Bada'i al-Sana'i, Vol. 1 Ibn Rushd, Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa Nihayat al-Muqtasid, Vol. 1 Shurunbulali, Imdad al-Fattah Badr al-Deen al-Ayni, Umdat al-Qari, Vol. 6 www.islamiqate.com/199/jummua-prayer-valid-without-caliph-muslim-ruler-hanafi-madhab#

[@Thesolution1m22]

This was really heart breaking my shaykh! A jamah is doing struggle to establish the deen of Allah upon the method of rasulullah S.A.W. and we instead of supporting them are finding their mistakes and becoming a hurdle for them. We neglect our major obligations and focus on doing masa over socks.

[@AsifAlli]

Shiekh Uthman didnt give any analysis of the book. But in fact he's wrong about the hizb

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

Is it really the method of the prophet(sav)? No,absolutely not. If you know them, you will know its wrong. The prophet did not only make politics, like the hizbu tahrir do it. The Islamic education is the most important part when you try to change a society. The islamic education and an islamic system together is the method,but hizbu tahrir does not carr about islamic education(good manners, naffsiyya, strong iman). This was not the method of prophet

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

Hizbu tahrir have the opinion that we MUST establish the khilafa like the propeht did. This is like, you have to pray like the prophet did it. But the problem is, not everthing that the prophet did, is obligatory. No islamic shoolar ever said that the establishment of the khilafah have a method. This is truly a Bidah. Why is there not a single schoolar who support his idea?

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

So brother tell me, what is our major obligation? Only khilafa? Absolutely wrong. What is with strengthen your iman,your nafsiyyah? This is not important?

[@randomthings1539]

@@WegderWahrheit____1 having is muslim leader is also important. If only praying 5 times a day and not trying to make a islamic state where you can be away from the system that was designed by capitalists where having halal life is almost not possible, economy flooded with riba, watching kids teens doing zina just because they can and law has more plot holes then roads on 3rd world contries. if Allah asks you why didn't you do try to make a change for your kids your grandkids. what will you answer? and don't bring that Calphate will establish when Allah wants. well that doesn't mean you don;t do you part. You prayer is farz important. but tell me, is you establish a islamic state won't people be more serious about their religion. There are hafiz literal hafiz who idles away when it is prayer time. reason? they get attached to the meterials the capitalists made. Imagine calling yourself one ummah but still be happy to be divided by borders. Muslims in kashmir, palestine suffers what can we do apart from praying and protesting, now imagine a khalifa was here. and saying "only islamic educations can change society" yeah bro live in your delulu, education without rules and decipline leads to nowhere.

[@samiibrahim5356]

As our brothers and sisters suffer through a genocide in occupied Palestine, I really wish we did have a united Islamic Army under a single Khalifa to stop the oppression of Muslims. If Hizb Tahrir is for the establishment of such a Khalifate what is the problem?

[@TheUnknownMAS]

Unification of the ummah based upon Islam (Quran and Sunnah) is extremely important, and anything to jeopardize that would be seriously sinful and dangerous. So be mindful, inshaAllah.

[@moali4470]

Have you spoken to Hizb ut tahrir directly? I find most ppl critique the hizb based on second/third hand info, you’d think students of knowledge would be better researched but sadly when it comes to hizb ut tahrir they take gosip as gospel

[@m.agilnajib345]

You think a person as qualified as Syaikh Uthman takes gossip as fact? There a book about it, he just unboxed it. Were asleep during the video akhi? :) barakallahu fiik ya akhi may Allah give you the correct knowledge.

[@danraf1562]

@@m.agilnajib345 persons are known by the truth whereas the truth isn't defined by persons. He openly lied about the emirs fiqhi Position regarding friday prayer without a caliph. Not withstanding other matters. And yet you question if the people have watched the Video and allude that they aren't knowledgable.

[@m.agilnajib345]

@@danraf1562 wait wait... hold up, what are we talking about here? Who lied about what regarding what? Throwing in a bunch of claims without context and explanation, yeah thats kinda alarming bro, ngl. You good bro? Hizb at Tahrir has caused devide, riots, injured innocents, and damage and harm in my country. They only bring hate speech to the goverment and extreemism. And Alhamdulillah now it is banned here by the government. May Allah keep it that way forever, aamiin.

[@danraf1562]

@@m.agilnajib345 alhamdulillah I am good but it seems like you didn't folllow your own recommandation and didn't watch the vid. Therefore U missed what uthman claimed falsely to be the position of the hizb regarding friday prayer without a caliph. That is only one "sectarian" lie that najdis throw in when they feel the need to villify muslims they disagree with on political reasons.

[@m.agilnajib345]

@@danraf1562 I rewatched the video, yes it was there, so i honestly missed it. Okay, here's the thing: Do I think Hizb at Tahrir brings harm? Yes, no doubt, it did in my country, it just created people who rebel against the goverment and created distress in the communities, until the goverment had to ban it. It has been warned by many scholars, and I'm no scholar, so I'd listen to them. Do I have beef with you? No I don't. All muslims should stick to the religion and unite upon the quran, and the sunnah (not upon any other thing). If I ofended you, I'm sorry. Spur of the monent bro. Syaikh Utman isn't a liar. But let me tell you this, if you shall defend what you believe is to be the truth, defend it with the quran and as sunnah with the way of the prophet peace be upon him and the sahabah and the salaf. Not just because a teacher or some group said so.

[@Oneummahgeneration]

Sheikh uthman a few points hizb don’t reject ahad Hadith. That is slanderous and you are liable to be held accountable for spreading misinformation. If you’ve studied uloomul Hadith you’d know that ahad Hadith are not considered as definitive compared to mutawattir Hadith. As such takfir isn’t made if one rejects a ahad Hadith but is considered fasiq without a justification for rejecting a Hadith ie if the isnad is weak etc. This is something sh uthman also implicitly accepts this when he claimed doubt over the Hadith about the age of Aisha (ra). Or when he claimed if Muslims reject these Hadith for a higher age then it’s not something that makes a person leave Islam. You see according to the majority of ulema. Imam shawkani, ibn taymiyya, Imam nawawi, ibn hajr, Imam ghazali Imam juwainy amongst many others ahad Hadith on its own isn’t certain but most correct as such it’s obligated to take it but not explicit kufr to reject it. It leads to deviancy and fisq without scholarly justification. This is the position of the hizb and no amount of Saudi salafi propaganda and ignorance will change the fact that this is the majority position on the status of Hadith As for punishment of grave the hizb simply do not have a position on this. What’s occurred is simply repeating a claim without knowledge on the subject. Finally the claim the hizb state there’s no jummah except with a khalifah. That’s again just false. The hizb has never said this. Rather it’s a position within the hanafi school based on the Hadith and application of usool Ul fiqh.

[@3GHee4erwer]

It is kufr to reject hadith when they're correct. If you studied hadith, you would realize there are mukhamaat same as the quran, and mutashabihaat and so on, but sadly you're just attacking Shaykh Uthman based on ignorance. May Allah guide us all.

[@3GHee4erwer]

Second: The Hadiths about Aisha do not state that her age is a muhkam, rather it is what the thought was. It does not indicate that the thought is correct or wrong, so believing she was 9 at marriage, or 18, or 20, or 14, is not indicated strictly.

[@3GHee4erwer]

Just an honest question: do you reject Hadith on aqeedah if its authentic? Be honest with your answer.

[@Oneummahgeneration]

@@3GHee4erwer which type of Hadith? Some scholars reject gharib narrations believing they are not suitable for actions Let alone for beliefs Some scholars reject mursal Hadith whereas others accept them. Some scholars reject a ahad Hadith qualifying a ruling established by mutawattir text. Others scholars reject ahad Hadith if it conflicts with the actions of the people of medinah.

[@danraf1562]

@@3GHee4erwer rejecting an ahad hadith without valid reason is fisq not kufr. Rejecting the whole sunna is kufr. The hizb doesn't reject ahad hadith. Their books are full of them. But stop claiming an ahad hadith to be on the same level as an aya or mutawatir report mutashabih or not. That's actually the Position of some twelvers, dhaheria and hashawiyya not the majority of ahlsunna.

[@UstadhWasimIsmail]

May Allāh reward you all with good.

[@truthteller1754]

So sheikh, what’s your method to re-establish the Khilafah?

[@MANJAMARA]

The knief is cool. :D

[@bahribahri8136]

Unboxing Is OK, but videos I really miss are ESSENTIAL BOOKS.

[@mewzi]

he finished them yeah?

[@bahribahri8136]

@@mewzi I guess.

[@rafayshakeel4812]

May Allah (SWT) reward you and your entire team for your efforts, Sheikh Uthman. Ameen!

[@azizpaktia7672]

AsSalamu Aleykum warahmatullah may Allah swt bless you, your family and your work, You have mentioned many points which are incorrect about Hizb ut Tahrir. 1. First of all the Hizb has a clear method and vision in how to establish the Islamic State/ Khilafah Rashidah based on Quran and Sunnah. The goal and the method is clearly written by the many books of the Hizb which are online free available. This is also what differentiates the Hizb from all the other groups who work for this noble cause, because our whole work is based on the Seerah of the Prophet salallahu aley wa salam. 2. We do not reject the Ahad Ahadeeth (Khabar ul Ahad)! Our whole work is also based on Ahad Ahadeeth, so how does it make sense to reject them!? What you may mean is the topic of taking them to Aqeedah ('Ilm ul yaqeen) and for that I present you some quotes of the classical scholars: - Imam an Nawawi (RH) said: “the majority of Muslim scholars and leading authorities (al-muhaqqiqun wal-aktharūn) held that unless the Sahih is of the mutawātir category, it shall remain probable and can never attain the level of certainty”. (Taqrib; 24) - Imam an Nawawi (RH), in the introduction to his famous Sharh Sahih Muslim responds to the opinion of Ibn al-Salah (RH)[13], who said that the ahādith narrated by Bukhari and Muslim imply certainty in and of themselves. Thus, Imam Nawawi after discussing this statement of Ibn al-Salah (RH) said: “What the shaykh said in this issue is against what the scholars said. Most of them said that the non-Mutawātir Hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim, imply conjecture (Dhann) since it is Āhād, and the āhād implies nothing but the conjecture (Dhann). This is based on what was already known and agreed upon. This rule applies without distinguishing between Bukhari, Muslim or others. However, their Hadiths are enough to be taken in the Ahkam (rule).” (Sharh Saheeh Muslim, vol. 1 pg. 20) - Imam Al Juwayni (RH) says: “Akhbār āhād provide necessity for actions, but do not provide necessity in ‘ilm[20] because a mistake is possible”. (Al Burhaan; 1/606.) - Imam Abu Al Walid ‘Al Baji (RH), in speaking of the Maliki school at large said: “The Madhab of Imam Malik is to accept Khabar al-Wahid in that it is obligatory to act upon it, but it doesn’t provide certainty by itself and this is what all scholars mentioned”. (Al Isharah fi usool al Fiqh; 20) - Imam Ash Shawkani says in his book Irshad ul-Fuhool: “The other category is Āhād (whether it does not imply al-‘Ilm at all or whether it implies the ‘Ilm with additional external supports). This category does not imply certainty by itself, and this is the opinion of the majority.” After this explanation, Ash-Shawkani moves to another point, saying: “The majority agree that it is a must to utilize Khabar ul-Āhād in the actions.” - Imam Ibn Humām said: “The majority of scholars and muhadditheen mentioned that Khabar al-Wāhid doesn’t provide certainty without other indications, and that with them it could provide ‘ilm but not necessarily indisputable certainty”. (Taysir at-Tahreer; 2/67) I think that should suffice inshaAllah. So the Hizb and the majority of the scholars say that it is obligatory to take Khabar ul Ahad for action but for definite Aqeedah matters they are not taken except the ones who are mutawatir. If someone rejects Khabar ul Ahad out of no reason, he is a Faasiq but not a Kafir. Kafir is he only when he reject definite things in Islam. 3. Adhab ul Qabr relates to the topic from before. And you will not find anywhere in our books that we deny it. In contrary we seek refuge from it. 4. The saying that Jummah is only Fard when there is a Khaleefah is a well known Ijtihad from the classical Hanafi scholars and not from the Hizb! The majority of the Ulamah including the founder of Hizb ut Tahrir Shaykh Taqiuddin an Nabhani (rh) are of the opinion that it is still fard whether or not a Khaleefah is there or not. It's only interesting to note what an importance the Khilafah has in the Hanafi Madhab for this particular issue. For more information you can visit the official pages of the Hizb or ask the Dawah carriers in your area if they're around inshaAllah. Jazakumullah Khayran!

[@mewzi]

as long as you're a hizb with aqeedah not of the sahaabah. You're in the 72 sects

[@Oneummahgeneration]

@@mewzi that makes no sense. You think the hizb reject the aqeeda of the sahaba? That’s just ignorance

[@Abd.Al-Malik]

@@mewzi So the Sahabah (rh) were called Muhahireen and they were called Ansar and from those the Aws and the Khazraj, and they were called Sahabah because not all of the Muslims at the time of the Prophet s.a.w. were Sahabah and in wars they (the Muslims) would carry banners by tribe etc etc, and ahlus sunnah is a group and the madhahibs are groups and the athari and ashari are groups and groups upon groups. What are you talking about ? If we are all not part of your opinion then we must be victims of saved sect mentality labels.

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

You dont know them.Ask them if they make IMAN on azabul qabr. I didnt say hizbu tahrir rejects it. I said they dont make lman on that and azabul qabr is firmly established part of the aqidah

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

To all those who do not believe the sheikh: In his main work "The Islamic Order of Life", by the founder of Hizbu Tahrir Taqiyyu d-Din an-Nabhani, it says on page 19: "Anything that is not established through these two paths, namely the understanding and the wording of the Quran and the definitive Sunnah, must not be accepted as a belief." In other words, for him, something must also be proven through reason in order to be able to make Iman in it. If you know any of their brothers, ask them what they think about the punishment of the grave. But ask those who are knowledgeable. They do NOT make FIRM IMAN about the punishment of the grave, but accept it as an uncertain matter. The fact is: All the scholars of Ahlu Sunnah are in agreement that one must make FIRM Iman about the punishment of the grave. The only ones who reject it are Mutazila or modern reform theologians and both are kuffar. The mutaazila have a very rationalistic approach. As I said, ask the brothers whether they believe in it or not, then you will know.

[@MANJAMARA]

Long time no book unboxing... ;) MashaAllah...

[@kardoxcenna260]

Love this series sheikh, please never stop!

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

To all those who do not believe the sheikh: In his main work "The Islamic Order of Life", by the founder of the Taqiyyu d-Din an-Nabhani party, it says on page 19: "Anything that is not established through these two paths, namely the understanding and the wording of the Quran and the definitive Sunnah, must not be accepted as a belief." In other words, for him, something must also be proven through reason in order to be able to make Iman in it. If you know any of their brothers, ask them what they think about the punishment of the grave. But ask those who are knowledgeable. They do NOT make FIRM IMAN about the punishment of the grave, but accept it as an uncertain matter. The fact is: All the scholars of Ahlu Sunnah are in agreement that one must make FIRM Iman about the punishment of the grave. The only ones who reject it are Mutazila or modern reform theologians and both are kuffar. The mutaazila have a very rationalistic approach. As I said, ask the brothers whether they believe in it or not, then you will know.

[@AusieGamer834]

Sheikh how are injuries from knife attack?

[@ArhamZaiem]

Opening after a Long time Shaykh 🥲🥲

[@ANTI-SECULARISM.]

Shykh .please tell us do you think Khilafa is unnecessary or this group has flaws in it. Please tell us what is the right way of establishment of Khilafa .please guide us .May Allah show us the right path.

[@TheBurnttea]

Alhamdulillah. I've been waiting for this. Akhi how about doing some book reviews.

[@busufyan]

May Allah preserve our Ustadh Wasim! A great track record بارك الله

[@A.--.]

Jazakallah Khair ya Ustad. I was thinking that the Khilafa was a Miracle that Allah established under Dawood (Prophet), Muhammad (Prophet) and later Issah (Prophet) peace be upon them all. Trying to force a Miracle is crazy. I hope Muslims don't go the way of Sabitai tzvei in modern Judaism.

[@A.--.]

Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank.

[@danraf1562]

@@A.--. the caliphate isn't a miracle and existed for over a millenia. The hukm (ruling) of it is wajib and the whole umma is responsible for its implementation in real life including the figureheads of the najdia movement to which uthman belongs.

[@A.--.]

@@danraf1562 never heard of that group

[@A.--.]

@@danraf1562 is there an authentic hadeeth which says it's wajib on everyone to establish it?

[@danraf1562]

@@A.--. look the term dawah najdia up. It is the group or rather movement of uthman from this chanel. And here is some evidence out of many that are relied upon by the classical scholars of Islam: It is narrated from Abu Hazm: “I was with Abu Hurayra for five years and heard from him a hadeeth: «كَانَتْ بَنُو إِسْرَائِيلَ تَسُوسُهُمُ الْأَنْبِيَاءُ، كُلَّمَا هَلَكَ نَبِيٌّ خَلَفَهُ نَبِيٌّ، وَإِنَّهُ لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِيي، وَسَتَكُونُ خُلَفَاءُ فَتَكْثُرُ، قَالُوا: فَمَا تَأْمُرُنَا؟ قَالَ: فُوا بِبَيْعَةِ الْأَوَّلِ، فَالْأَوَّلِ، وَأَعْطُوهُمْ حَقَّهُمْ، فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ سَائِلُهُمْ عَمَّا اسْتَرْعَاهُمْ» “The prophets reigned over the sons of Israel. When one prophet was dying, the next one came after him. After me there will be no prophets, but there will be caliphs, and there will be many.” The audience asked: “What will you order us to do?”. To this the Messenger of Allah ﷺ replied: “Observe the oath of the first, then again the first, and give them their rights. Verily, Allah will ask them for what He gave them under their responsibility.” (Bukhari, Muslim) It is narrated from Nafi, who said: “Abdullah ibn Umar told me that he heard the Prophet ﷺ say: «مَنْ خَلَعَ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ لَقِيَ اللَّهَ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ لا حُجَّةَ لَهُ وَمَنْ مَاتَ وَلَيْسَ فِي عُنُقِهِ بَيْعَةٌ مَاتَ مَيْتَةً جَاهِلِيَّةً» “Those who depart from the subjugation, will meet Allah in the Day of Judgment, without justification, and those who died without an oath, died the death of the times of ignorance” (Muslim). when your Lord said to the angels, “Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive authority (calif).” They said, “Will You place upon it one who causes corruption therein and sheds blood, while we declare Your praise and sanctify You?” Allah said, “Indeed, I know that which you do not know.” [Al-Baqara: 30] “Imam Qurtubi and others used this verse as proof of the obligatory election of the Caliph, so that he resolved the differences, litigation, strife that arose between people, defended the oppressed from the oppressor, set up the system of punishments, to withhold from abominations. Imam is also necessary for the implementation of other very important things, the implementation of which is impossible without him. Therefore, what is necessary to carry out the wajib - itself becomes a wajib” (Tafsir ul-Quran il-azim).

[@liby254]

we've been missing them to sheikh. Please bring them back. BarakaAllahFeekum

[@Abd.Al-Malik]

When we hear people speak about the importance or wish for Khilafah, descibing it in general and vague terms. Never discussing what it actually is, never teaching about it's structure or it's reality. Never seeing any fruits, movement(s) or actions towards this cause. Then what is the intrinsic value of their words when mentioning this obligation ??? Expressing "We all want", yet we wait until it falls on our heads from the sky, without working and being in the market actively seeking it. What is that ?? Du'a towards a certain end is always combined with action. And this book nor it's endorsement or presentation does not contribute to anything. If you say this is wrong and that is better or correct, then please do so, act. Otherwise words are just words and a refutation is just a refutation for the sole cause of refutation. If the author claims to be or do better than please demonstrate it by actions, do not say what you do not do. Ps: ever wondered why you will find Turks (Hanifi fiqh) praying 4 rakaat after the djumua prayer ? Educate and elaborate, instead of pushing one liners that will only lead to misplaced confusion or suspicions. Jzk

[@Abd.Al-Malik]

@Yamin I love dr. Israr RH

[@yasiryousf9016]

Question: What is Hadith My understanding is Hadith is sayings of Prophet Muhammad PBUH but when u say Hadith of sayings of other Sahabi's RA or Tabaeens as Hadith after the death of Prophet Muhammad PBUH m really confused Plz guide me

[@3GHee4erwer]

look it up linguistically

[@danraf1562]

Some differenriate between hadith and athar. They use hadith when it is about the Prophet and athar when it is about sahaba. Others use the terms hadith and athar interchangeably.

[@yasiryousf9016]

@@3GHee4erwer JazakAllah

[@yasiryousf9016]

@@danraf1562 JazakAllah

[@danraf1562]

@@yasiryousf9016 wa iyyak

[@CocoLVMH]

Asalam Alekoom Shaikh Othman, I’m Shaikha from Dubai, United Arab Emirates and as you know we have lots of other nationalities among us at home and work as well, some are Christians and others atheists. I would like to ask you if you make a short video telling about: 1- What does Muslim mean? 2- Why does everyone accept Islam? 3- What are these contradictions in the Bible? 4- Why can not consider the Christianity as a salvation? 5- How did prophet Jesus pray and warship The Father? 6- Finally, where did Christmas and ester come from? Because I do really care about them so, i can show the video and invite them to the Islam .... At the end I really want to thank you very much for you efforts and patients for Da’awa .... Jazak Allah Kheer

[@mewzi]

he has many videos he did da'wah to Christians and I've seen all these answered

[@CocoLVMH]

@@mewzi yes I know he has, but they all very long videos and I’m asking for a short and brief video to show as much as I can to people here ...

[@mewzi]

@@CocoLVMH I would cut short some videos but I have a very tight schedule

[@CocoLVMH]

@@mewzi grateful 😃👍🏻

[@MohammadBassamDenmark]

Love you Sheikh ❤️

[@azarudintabres]

May you explain in detail about this topicv

[@mewzi]

you can check shaykh Al-albani's lecture on this, it's there's on KZbin translated

[@danraf1562]

Check with the hizb directly and don't rely on biased tertiary persons who slander and invent out of their heads.

[@mohammad4388]

Sheikh, do a knife collection series next. You always seem to have a different knife for all of your unboxing videos lol.

[@ifan4264]

Please continue seerah

[@AbuMujaddid]

I think it’s far-fetched to call this book an unbiased criticism of Hizb ut Tahrir. What would be actually convincing is if the title was more in the lines like ‘Criticism of Islamic Movements’ or if it was in a series of books dealing with the various Islamic Movements one of them being Hizb ut Tahrir. This is unfortunately a typical neo-salafi approach of putting every other Muslim jama’ah, hizb, harakat, tanzimat, etc. under the 72 sect category only to highlight the ‘salafiyyah’ as the correct jama’ah. Salafiyyah itself is divided into multiple ahzab, but Wasim Ismail won’t make a book about the Madkhalis, the salafi jihadis, the haraki, etc. where one makes takfir of one another and call eachother murji’ah and khawarij. When I see that I’ll consider him someone who honestly critiques the different groups.

[@AdhelAlSalafi]

Shaykh please continue zad dars.

[@gadzekpo8661]

How many knives...loool Allahumma baarik lak

[@AbuKhalid-Al-Hanafi]

What are u doing to establish the very caliphate you gave benefits of . lets criticize HT who are doing some thing at least giving awareness while on the other hand. What r u doing for the rebuilding of the shield .. I won't say shaikh a madkhali but i just expect better from him...

[@imbored1179]

Those groups are khwarij. If you go against clear hadith saying not to rebell or not to publically criticize rulers, how can you expect Allah to rectify the Ummah. The prophet said even if they were tyrants we should obey them

[@AbuKhalid-Al-Hanafi]

@@imbored1179 what about the clear ayat of establishing shariah .we understand ahadees by the actions of aslaaf and aima and whenever they were encountering the hakims who were going against Allah's order they tried to stop them .(eg Imam Husain , Imam Abu hanifa , imam malik , Zain ul abideen an so on) were they khawarij 🤔. No brother . Ahadees are there that you will obey them only if it is aligned with orders of Allah . stay blessed.

[@imbored1179]

@@AbuKhalid-Al-Hanafi imam Malik didn't call for rebellion against rulers, he was imprisoned and still didn't do so. He rejected the falsehood but refused to rebell

[@imbored1179]

@@AbuKhalid-Al-Hanafi Narrated Ibn `Abbas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Whoever disapproves of something done by his ruler then he should be patient, for whoever disobeys the ruler even a little (little = a span) will die as those who died in the Pre-lslamic Period of Ignorance. (i.e. as rebellious Sinners). Narrated Usaid bin Hudair: A man came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! You appointed such-and-such person and you did not appoint me?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "After me you will see rulers not giving you your right (but you should give them their right) and be patient till you meet me."

[@AbuKhalid-Al-Hanafi]

@@imbored1179 yeah 1 . prophet SAW Said that whoever dont have given biah to khalifa he would die on jahiliah . where is khalifah of the ummah ?? 2 . Prophet SAW even said if you dont find that Khalifah of Jama so get away from all the people calling towards hell fire . حَدَّثَنَا مُسَدَّدٌ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْوَارِثِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو التَّيَّاحِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ صَخْرِ بْنِ بَدْرِ الْعِجْلِيِّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ سُبَيْعِ بْنِ خَالِدٍ بِهَذَا الْحَدِيثِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ حُذَيْفَةَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَجِدْ يَوْمَئِذٍ خَلِيفَةً فَاهْرُبْ حَتَّى تَمُوتَ فَإِنْ تَمُتْ وَأَنْتَ عَاضٌّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏وَقَالَ فِي آخِرِهِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ قُلْتُ:‏‏‏‏ فَمَا يَكُونُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ ؟ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ لَوْ أَنَّ رَجُلًا نَتَجَ فَرَسًا لَمْ تُنْتَجْ حَتَّى تَقُومَ السَّاعَةُ. The tradition mentioned above has also been transmitted by Hudhaifah through a different chain of narrators from the Prophet صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم. This version says: He said: If you do not find a caliph in those days, then flee away until you die, even of you die holding on (to a stump of a tree). I asked: What will come next ? He replied: If a man wants the mare to bring forth a foal, it will not deliver in till the Last Hour comes. Sunan Abu Dawood#4247 Trials and Fierce Battles (Kitab Al-Fitan Wa Al-Malahim) Status: صحیح 3 . and prophet SAW said there could only be one khalifa of Jama implementing Shariah not 57 of 57 nationstates not implementing Shariah . حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ قَالَ : حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ قَالَ : حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ قَالَ : حَدَّثَنِي بُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ قَالَ : حَدَّثَنِي أَبُو إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلَانِيُّ ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ حُذَيْفَةَ بْنَ الْيَمَانِ ، يَقُولُ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : «يَكُونُ دُعَاةٌ عَلَى أَبْوَابِ جَهَنَّمَ ، مَنْ أَجَابَهُمْ إِلَيْهَا قَذَفُوهُ فِيهَا» ، قُلْتُ : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صِفْهُمْ لَنَا ، قَالَ : «هُمْ قَوْمٌ مِنْ جِلْدَتِنَا يَتَكَلَّمُونَ بِأَلْسِنَتِنَا» ، قُلْتُ : فَمَا تَأْمُرُنِي إِنْ أَدْرَكَنِي ذَلِكَ؟ قَالَ : فَالْزَمْ جَمَاعَةَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ ، وَإِمَامَهُمْ ، قُلْتُ : فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُمْ جَمَاعَةٌ ، وَلَا إِمَامٌ؟ قَالَ : فَاعْتَزِلْ تِلْكَ الْفِرَقَ كُلَّهَا ، وَلَوْ أَنْ تَعَضَّ بِأَصْلِ شَجَرَةٍ ، حَتَّى يُدْرِكَكَ الْمَوْتُ ، وَأَنْتَ كَذَلِكَ It was narrated from Hudhaifah bin Yaman that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “There will be callers at the gates of Hell; whoever responds to them they throw them into it.” I said: “O Messenger of Allah, describe them to us.” He said: “They will be from our people, speaking our language.” I said: “What do you command me to do, if I live to see that?” He said: “Adhere tothe main body of the Muslims and their leader. If there is no such body and no leader, then withdraw from all their groups, even if you bite onto the trunk of a tree until death finds you in that state.” Sunan Ibn e Majah#3979 Tribulation's Status: صحیح 4. Prophet SAW is saying us to adhere to ummah's jama and leader not nationalistic hakims practicing taghoot(Non Islamic) Systems in there countries. We are ordered to stop them doing evil which our hand if we see and if not then with tongue if not then consider it bad in heart and it would be the weakest state of eman . 5 . It is the best jihad according to Prophet SAW حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عُبَادَةَ الْوَاسِطِيُّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏حَدَّثَنَا يَزِيدُ يَعْنِي ابْنَ هَارُونَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏أَخْبَرَنَا إِسْرَائِيلُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جُحَادَةَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْعَطِيَّةَ الْعَوْفِيِّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيِّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ:‏‏‏‏ أَفْضَلُ الْجِهَادِ كَلِمَةُ عَدْلٍ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ أَوْ أَمِيرٍ جَائِرٍ . Narrated Abu Saeed al-Khudri: The Prophet صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم said: The best fighting (jihad) in the path of Allah is (to speak) a word of justice to an oppressive ruler. Sunan Abu Dawood#4344 Battles (Kitab Al-Malahim) Status: صحيح. It is obligation( Farz Kafaya) on Muslims the Implementation of Kitab ullah . and the galiba of deen ..for which Prophet SAW was sent Surat No 61 : سورة الصف - Ayat No 9 ہُوَ الَّذِیۡۤ اَرۡسَلَ رَسُوۡلَہٗ بِالۡہُدٰی وَ دِیۡنِ الۡحَقِّ لِیُظۡہِرَہٗ عَلَی الدِّیۡنِ کُلِّہٖ وَ لَوۡ کَرِہَ الۡمُشۡرِکُوۡنَ﴿۹﴾

[@NH5.]

Alhamdulillah. At last. I was so ready for this. Jazakallaho Khairan

[@aijazrasool8922]

May Allāh st give hidaya to the Madkhali Wasim Ismail😊

[@karimrm2479]

❤

[@fullsendit292]

was hoping it would be refutation of dowlah but looks like no salafis want to come out and refute them

[@merajnasim09]

I want to be your student shaikh help me to learn Islam better and start dawah ...i am from India

[@danraf1562]

In india you have scholars and muslims too. Follow the ideas and don't follow persons or celebrities whoever they might be.

[@TheUnknownMAS]

Straw-man arguments, sadly but not surprisingly. We hope and pray that you shaykh don’t join the saudi boot licking gong blindly, consciously or unconsciously, spreading misinformation, lies, hate and false accusations. Be more careful and sincere when saying words against some Muslims. If you’re not sure, don’t talk until you do your due homework, you should speak with the knowledgeable scholars or ulema from Hizbut Tahrir if you like to. Or, stay quiet about it. But don’t lie, because you know that saying around something you hear from someone without verifying it is nothing but lying. May Allah SWT forgive and guide us all, ameen!

[@max445x]

Mashallah good to see the book جامع الكامل in the background

[@المجرتيني]

My name is جامع

[@max445x]

@@المجرتيني mashallah, good name

[@nanashi2146]

@@max445x What does it mean brother? Jami'al Kamil?

[@mewzi]

@@nanashi2146 it's a book called الجامع الكامل في الحديث الصحيح الشامل المرتب على أبواب الفقه - ضياء الرحمن الاعظمي that is, a complete compilation of saheeh hadith, categorised on chapters of fiqh by the famous muhaddith Diya al-Rahman al-A'zami. It doesn't have all the saheeh ahadith in the world, but it has all those which are on chapters of fiqh, like Taharah, 'Ibadah.. etc so you won't get dream interpretation, tafseer etc it's available online btw

[@nanashi2146]

@@mewzi Ok, jzk brother

[@Al_khilafa]

i am disagree with you on hizb ut tehrir.i think you have false knowlege about it.

[@TheOneummah11]

How someone like you can accuse balantly??. 1. Show me where Hizb Ut Tahrir rejected Ahad Hadith?? 2. Show me where Hizb Ut Tahrir rejected Azab e Kabr?? 3. Again show me proof where Hizb Ut Tahrir said Jummah is not obligatory without khilafah? Either show the proof, or Apologize for your balant lie or wait for the day of judgment when we will be accountable for everything.

[@ma5839]

Disappointed. Hoped for better. Several untruths mentioned. Everybody does NOT work towards and want a khilafah. Many are satisfied being under Taghut, especially those who work for & under existing regimes. I hope Shaykh can bring a better analysis next time, bithnillah

[@mahim1059]

Madhkhalis have no shame at all

[@Mohammad_ibn_Ansaar]

If only you actually read their works rather than peddling false information based upon lies. What use are those books behind you when you spread lies? You only have to read shaksiyyah vol 1 by shiekh taqquiddin (rm) who says it is haram to reject ahad narration. Furthermore, Shiekh ata khalil abu rashta, the current amir of hizb ut tahrir has said that it is the hanafi opinion that there is no jummah without khalifah, but this is the weakest opinion amongst the scholars of the ahnaf madhab. Again, lie upon lie. May Allah guide you. May Allah distant you from the ppl who spread lies about our mother aisha (ra). Ameen. Alhamdulillah that you didn't live amongst our mother's time. What would have your tongue uttered! May Allah forgive you. Ameen.

[@AwaisKhan-oy8rp]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Lol little internet keyboard warrior, know your place pls!

[@nanashi2146]

Just your standard internet hizbi

[@Mohammad_ibn_Ansaar]

@@AwaisKhan-oy8rp 😂. Luckily, not a place you belong to.

[@danraf1562]

Sadaqt ya akhi. May Allah t bless you and the hizb and forgive our brother Uthman. Ameen.

[@Mohammad_ibn_Ansaar]

@@danraf1562 Ameen

[@sohailmuhammad.293]

Please recommend books in urdu ... unfortunately lot of urdu books are out there without any proper tehqeeq and we as laymen cant differentiate between right and wrong

[@northernrebel1402]

Please continue the seerah series.

[@kashurkashmiri5571]

Someone gift me this book....

[@danraf1562]

It has no value. Only slander and false info. From the pro Saudi faction.

[@percyrajapaksa4194]

Hello...

[@rameezahamed]

I used to think that you are speaking based on sound evidences. This small clips shows how unfair you are. Please provide evidences for your claims . Otherwise, it would be allegations.

[@quranandsunnahbangla3085]

Assalamu'alikum wa Rahmatullah. Shaykh hope you are well. If it is possible one day please make a video about the false ideology of this Hizbutahrir group. I have a group of brothers in my town misguiding the Muslims. I want to advise them with wisdom and knowledge. Barakallahu feekum

[@ishtiaquekhan1148]

No, we need every angle. Those are needed as well.

[@mewzi]

shaykh Al-albani has a lecture and it's there on KZbin translated

[@atifzaman7582]

@@mewzi Link pls brother

[@mewzi]

@@atifzaman7582 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJSbpqGarLmEe5o

[@quranandsunnahbangla3085]

@@mewzi Barakallahu feekum. I have seen those lectures. They are quite long. It would be nice if shaykh Uthmaan does a video as I love the way he explains things. When he has some time by the permission of Allah

[@eliasgem9789]

Sheikh i thought you were smartere than this

[@ansarak8860]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i2K8cqR4bpaog68 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👊👊👊👊😠😠😠 Shaikh uthman bin farooq the so called salafi spreader exposed Shaikh uthman has insulted imaams like ibne hajar, imaam kurtubi, imaan nawawi etc.... Shaikh utman how dare you to insult imaams???? May Allah guide you man (salafi Shaikh)

[@clivecottam1509]

mashaallah, poor audio br.

[@emerywebb9656]

𝐩яⓞ𝓂𝓞Ş𝐦 🤔

[@Malikin]

lol Dawah on internet is not something to be proud of. Digital molvis xD

[@AwaisKhan-oy8rp]

Lol Jahil

[@SALEEMKHAN-xb7qi]

Asalamualaikum Warahmatullah...Shykh ...I'm from Kashmir...I just want to contact you but I don't how... because I have some issues about Fiqh...

[@eprohoda]

thank ou. breathtaking . broth, 😌

[@CrazySaad111]

Do you have Gmail on which I can contact you in, or a phone number.

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

To all those who do not believe the sheikh: In his main work "The Islamic Order of Life", by the founder of Hizbu Tahrir Taqiyyu d-Din an-Nabhani, it says on page 19: "Anything that is not established through these two paths, namely the understanding and the wording of the Quran and the definitive Sunnah, must not be accepted as a belief." In other words, for him, something must also be proven through reason in order to be able to make Iman in it. If you know any of their brothers, ask them what they think about the punishment of the grave. But ask those who are knowledgeable. They do NOT make FIRM IMAN about the punishment of the grave, but accept it as an uncertain matter. The fact is: All the scholars of Ahlu Sunnah are in agreement that one must make FIRM Iman about the punishment of the grave. The only ones who reject it are Mutazila or modern reform theologians and both are kuffar. The mutaazila have a very rationalistic approach. As I said, ask the brothers whether they believe in it or not, then you will know.

[@ansarak8860]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i2K8cqR4bpaog68 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👊👊👊👊😠😠😠 Shaikh uthman bin farooq the so called salafi spreader exposed Shaikh uthman has insulted imaams like ibne hajar, imaam kurtubi, imaan nawawi etc.... Shaikh utman how dare you to insult imaams???? May Allah guide you man (salafi Shaikh)

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

To all those who do not believe the sheikh: In his main work "The Islamic Order of Life", by the founder of Hizbu Tahrir Taqiyyu d-Din an-Nabhani, it says on page 19: "Anything that is not established through these two paths, namely the understanding and the wording of the Quran and the definitive Sunnah, must not be accepted as a belief." In other words, for him, something must also be proven through reason in order to be able to make Iman in it. If you know any of their brothers, ask them what they think about the punishment of the grave. But ask those who are knowledgeable. They do NOT make FIRM IMAN about the punishment of the grave, but accept it as an uncertain matter. The fact is: All the scholars of Ahlu Sunnah are in agreement that one must make FIRM Iman about the punishment of the grave. The only ones who reject it are Mutazila or modern reform theologians and both are kuffar. The mutaazila have a very rationalistic approach. As I said, ask the brothers whether they believe in it or not, then you will know.

[@WegderWahrheit____1]

To all those who do not believe the sheikh: In his main work "The Islamic Order of Life", by the founder of Hizbu Tahrir Taqiyyu d-Din an-Nabhani, it says on page 19: "Anything that is not established through these two paths, namely the understanding and the wording of the Quran and the definitive Sunnah, must not be accepted as a belief." In other words, for him, something must also be proven through reason in order to be able to make Iman in it. If you know any of their brothers, ask them what they think about the punishment of the grave. But ask those who are knowledgeable. They do NOT make FIRM IMAN about the punishment of the grave, but accept it as an uncertain matter. The fact is: All the scholars of Ahlu Sunnah are in agreement that one must make FIRM Iman about the punishment of the grave. The only ones who reject it are Mutazila or modern reform theologians and both are kuffar. The mutaazila have a very rationalistic approach. As I said, ask the brothers whether they believe in it or not, then you will know.