Bootlickers? RESPONSE to Daniel Haqiqatjou by Shaykh AbdulAziz Al-Haqqan | PART 3

The background of Shaykh AbdulAziz Al-Haqqan (may Allah preserve him):
“I did not go to any Islamic University. I sought ʿIlm, Islamic knowledge, in the masjid; and that is my school. I don’t take ʿIlm or teach it from doubtful people, only major scholars and sheikhs like Sheikh Bin ʿUthaymīn, Sheikh Bin Bāz, Al-Albāni, Sālih Al-Fawzān and others. Some Mashāyikh (teachers) I have studied with for years and some for a very brief time. I have studied the most with Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Tahiri and he knows me. Some of the Sheikhs I have met and taken ʿIlm from are Sheikh Sālih As-Suhaimy, Sheikh Sulaimān Ar-Ruhaily, Sheikh Abdul-Razzāq Al-Badr, Sheikh ʿAli At-Tuwaijry, Sheikh Falāh Mundakār, Sheikh Sālih As-Sindi and many more. I am on the way of Sheikh Bin Bāz, Bin ʿUthaymīn, Al-Albāni, Sālih al-Fawzān; not on any sect or party. I am the lowest of the students of knowledge. I refused to teach and record in public until my Mashāyikh had approved.”
The original video was posted is taken from: / @gardenofilm
Benefit from the youtube channel, as there are many books being taught live and uploaded.
The following channel is also managed by the Shaykh where lessons from scholars are translated:
/ @rabbaniyeen
@rabbaniyeentranslations

[@blankchannel7522]

Assalamu alikum. I posted this comment earlier: "I bear witness that I repent to Allah from following Daniel and sharing his content. May Allah forgive me, and I make duaa that all the brothers and Shaykh Rabee al-Madkhali forgive me. Astaghfiruallah." After the amount of insults and accusations that I received from the followers of Daniel, I had deleted the comment to avoid the hurtful insults. I then realized that maybe I should keep it as a show of encouragement to others who were like me, and just ignore those who will reply to it, this is the least I can do to announce my repentance to those whom I have oppressed with ignorance, and whatever backlash I get is nothing compared to what the brothers and scholars are facing. I really benefitted a lot in the past from Daniels responses to liberals and secularists, but I can't support anymore after all these violations and misinterpretations to Islam, he should've just sticked to what he's good at, which clearly isn't Islamic theology.. But at least I got to know Shaykh alhaqqan and Shaykh Rabee, and this fitna enlightened me to scholars and to the Aqidah of Ahlul Sunnah that sadly I was ignorant of and opposing, alhamdulilah. May Allah guide us all.

[@saoud_alahbabi]

MashaAllah akhi, May Allah عز وجل keep you firm. Don’t worry about the ignorants , let them call you what they want, it’s their deeds you’re taking. I’m honestly laughing at them calling us Agents and Bootlickers, they think they have something. But it’s Allah عز وجل they would have to answer at the day of judgment for their false accusations.

[@NYCStateofMind7]

Congrats 😊 🎊 Hamdoulilah 🤲🏻💐 May Allah guide Daniel and his Ultras 😅

[@nrnar]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHLSk56lac6Ne68 Wa alaikumussalaam, please have a look at the response to Shaykh Al Haqqan video.

[@nahimwasit]

@Bearded Guy Sheikh al Allama Al BRO 😂

[@nahimwasit]

Akhi welcome to ahlus sunnah wal jama’ah

[@thewiseowl9767]

JazakAllahu kheiran brother for your efforts. This is all based on knowledge of the Deen alhamdulillah. May Allah guide the ummah upon the Quran and Sunnah according to the understanding of the companions.

[@shahriarh]

May Allah reward you too akhi. And just to let you know, This channel is not the Shaykh's own channel so you will not find all his videos here. Visit the original channel and subscribe to benefit inShaAllah. He takes live classes around 5 days a week and previous books taught are already uploaded in the playlists. www.youtube.com/@gardenofilm

[@astheticgirl505]

how ignorant can you be.Must be a Bedouin

[@hashimbalawi]

Doesn't get more clear-cut than this. I hope these Daees look at such evidence from the sunnah against what they do.

[@usermuhahaha]

Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatu akhi Hasem what an unlikely place to meet you hahaha. This is Muhammad from university. Good to see you follow Ustadh Abdulaziz Al Haqqan. May Allah reward you and increase you in knowledge.

[@usermuhahaha]

Show this to all of the MSA folks and the ikhwanul muslimeen ideology they consume by bringing in people like Sam Hammadi to speak and free mixing and all the shubuhat and Shahawat of tiktok video making. Wallahi they all need to fix their Aqeedah by Allah’s permission. Allahu Musta3an

[@aboeAimen]

Salaam 3aljkum ustadh baraak Allah oe fik. If I am currently in the west I have the nationality of holland and marokko. So is my bay3a for the king of Morocco because he's Muslim right?. I hope I have a solid bay3a wa Allah oe a3lem..

[@sbzush]

You won't find the answer on KZbin comments, akhee. Reach out to the scholars themselves. (Also, this isn't Shaykh Abdulaziz's channel).

[@yalbad5160]

So if the Saudi rulers allow Jews into Mecca, no one should criticize them? if they legalize pornography, no criticism? If they join Kaffirs in killing Muslims,we should be quiet?

[@Sharukh-ze4dh]

Yes unless you’re able to advise him privately. Submit to the hadith of the prophet sent down by Allah

[@yalbad5160]

@@Sharukh-ze4dh And of they do nothing, or throw me in jail, then so be it? Let them do these horrible things?

[@Sharukh-ze4dh]

@@yalbad5160 or what else are u gonna do? Backbite and give all ur good deeds to the rulers?? They’re normal people like us so sins will be there even if u advise them privately. Make dua for them. change has to come from within rulers

[@yalbad5160]

@@Sharukh-ze4dh There is a big difference between sinning on your own, and corrupting society. And why should rulers get away with it? If a man kills he is punished, if a women prostitutes, she is punished, but a ruler who does both doesn't?

[@Sharukh-ze4dh]

@@yalbad5160 because prophet of Allah ﷺ said so. Next u will start asking whats the point of salah I could just meditate. Islam works on revelation not reason.

[@toasty-toast]

Ibn Taymiyah openly defied and spoke aginast rulers. Also which of the 50 Muslim rulers are you not supposed to criticize? That guy running Turkey?

[@pathofthesalaf]

This has already been answered in the following videos: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZ-VoGerqNuNZqs kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWPOqomNeK2sbrc kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnPKmKR7aNGlptU

[@evadehell]

Bro they criticize H@m@s and say they are not real rulers so it’s ok! The cognitive dissonance is incredible

[@longegg-wind9577]

I don’t understand why this is such a hard question, don’t criticise any of them. Why do you feel the urge to criticise someone? If you want to criticise someone then criticise yourself

[@evadehell]

@@longegg-wind9577 Are you Muslim? You lack basic understanding of our religion

[@tayloryoung4974]

The same ibn taymiah he was quoting? Or you didn't even watch the video? 4 hours of proofs are not enough for someone with desires, sad state of affairs, may Allah guide you.

[@callertoallaahexaltedmosth8075]

Thankyou Ya Sheikh.👍.

[@ozone2126]

❤❤❤🎉❤❤❤😊

[@SirajAlGurbat]

Akhi what’s your opinion on things statements of the salaf about criticizing the rulers Harb al-Kirmani said in al-Masan'il (2/882) Abdullah bin Abd al-Wahhab told us, he said: Ziyad bin al-Rabee' told us, on the authority of Abd al-Rahman bin Udhayna, he said: Our sheikhs told us, he said: "There are three who have no sanctity or backbiting, the unjust and unjust ruler, the defiant and openly " immoral, and the owner of heresy ?I asked Isaac about the backbiting of the unjust sultan " He said: "There is nothing in them except that which a person hates to use his tongue Al-Akhdar told us, he said: Aarim told us, he said: Khalid told us, I heard Ubaid Allah say about the occultation of the Kharijites and the sultan who had announced did not see their .occultation :Ibn Abi Al-Dunya said in Al-Sumt Youssef bin Musa told us, Abd al-Rahman bin Maghra told us, Al-A'mash told us, on - 222 the authority of Ibrahim, he said: "Three were not counted as backbiting: the unjust imam, ".the innovator, and the openly immoral immoral Muhammad told me, Yahya bin Abi Bakir told us, on the authority of Shrek, on the - 234 authority of Aqeel, on the authority of Al-Hassan, may God be pleased with him, that he said: "Three have no backbiting: the one who desires, the immoral person who declares his "immorality, and the unjust imam :"And in the additions of Abdullah Ibn Imam Ahmad Ali "Al-Zuhd My father told me, Ali bin Shaqiq told us, Kharijah told us, Ibn Jaban told us, on the - 238 authority of Al-Hassan, he said: "There are three whose honors are not forbidden to you: ".openly immoral, unjust imam, and innovator Al-Hassan bin Abd Al-Aziz Al-Jarwi narrated to us, on the authority of Damra, on - 1666 the authority of Ibn Shawthab, on the authority of Al-Hassan, who said: "Three have no backbiting: the traitorous imam, the one with passion who calls to his own desires, and the ".openly immoral sinner :"Al-Bayhaqi said in "The People Abu Abdullah Al-Hafiz informed us, I am Abu Abdullah Muhammad Bin Abdullah - 6374 Bin Dinar Al-Adl, told us Zakariya Bin Dalwaih, told us Ali Bin Salamah Al-Labaqi, he said: I heard Ibn Uyaynah say: "There are three people who have no backbiting: the unjust imam, the openly defiant With his immorality, and the innovator who calls people to his .heresy :"Al-Harawi said in condemning "the speech Abu Yaqoub told us, Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Al-Azhar told us, Ahmed - 700 bin Muhammad bin Yunus told us, Abu Zaid Al-Dareer Al-Mustaml told us, Ahmad bin Abi Raja told us, Muawiyah bin Amr told us, on the authority of Abi Ishaq Al-Fazari, on the authority of Al-Awza'i, he said: He said: Yahya bin Abi Katheer: "There are three people in whom there is no backbiting: an unjust imam, an adherent of heresy, and an immoral ".person

[@Salafization1]

Assalamu alikum akhie, I just completed an entire refutation regarding this shubha in a 25 page pdf, and will share it soon with a video format as well within a week and a half when I come back from my convention in shaa Allah. Be patient and stay tuned for the response you'll find that it will be an easy doubt to be addressed in shaa Allah. Barak Allah feek.

[@Sharukh-ze4dh]

Sheikhs can make mistakes but ur prophet s won’t

[@tdackjordan5873]

@@Salafization1 These zanadiq make no sense I was debating with one and he told me that if a Muslim ruler makes interest legal you have to first ask the ruler if he did this for worldly reasons or he thinks its better than Allah legislation inorder to make takfeer if not you become a khwarage So I asked them if he can show me dallel from Quran and suna or the three recommended generations of the salaf like when some made takfeer on Hajaj how come they never asked him this or the other suhaba call them khwarage, how come the prophet Mohammed pbuh who he told us to fallow in methodology didn't do Thier way He then tells me Mohammed pbuh suhaba jumah got it wrong but his select palace scholars are the true jama and are ah l Al suna on the right path 😂

[@tdackjordan5873]

@@Salafization1 These neo saudi salifis have no clue what the aqeeda of the khwarage are, if this is the case we can just accuse anyone that we don't like as khwarage The khwarage believe that sins take people out of Islam(like lying, stealing, drinking alcohol, fornication) and they used to make takfeer on the suhaba, they believe faith does not increase nor decrease, they are harsh and kill the Muslims but soft and spare the kuffar These are things that the Islamic State don't believe in One time Ibn Abbas(ra) had a debate with the khwarage he asked them why they make takfeer on Ali(Ra)and the muslims? Their reply was because they don't rule by other than what Allah has sent The judgment is for none but Allah. [Sūrah al-Anā’m, 6:57 and Sūrah Yūsuf, 12:40, 67] And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon.” [al-Maa’idah 5:44].(such as legalizing intrist, acohol, stop and replacing the hudud punishment of Allah, practicing shirk democracy) So Ibn Abbas asked them how he did not rule by other than what Allah revealed? Their reply was that they judged through arbitration between the suhaba on who should be the leader after Uthmans(raa) death( notice they did not say because Ali legalized intrists, alcohol, changed the hudud penal punishment s or allied with the kuffar against the muslims) So Ibn Abbas(ra) replied that in the Quran Allah allowed arbitration in disputes he even quoted the quran verse 4:35 And if you fear dissension between the two, send an arbitrator from his people and an arbitrator from her people. If they both desire reconciliation, Allah will cause it between them. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Acquainted [with all things]. Even though Allah gave us a brain, 2 eyes and 2 ears to think and use Unfortunately in the post colonialization brainwashed muslim world we have Colonial puppet leaders and palace scholars( the ones the prophet warned us to stay away from and that will come in the Future) that you are just supposed to simply blindly fallow anything you hear from a corrupt pallace scholar and never question thats why we have people like Shamsi Mohamed pbuh taught us that we are one Uma we must love for are Brother what we love for are selves and that the Uma is like one body if one finger was hurt the whole body will feel pain And Allah says in the Quran whoever takes allies with the kuffar than he is one of them My question to Shamsi and muslims like him if a Kafir (god forbid) we're to come break into your house kill, rape your wife, mother and children and steal it would you give him a cup of water , would you provide him with money, protection, weapons, basses, or assist that criminal in any way........now any sane muslim would say no So then how in the world can you claim these westren Colonial puppet rulers who don't rule by other than what Allah brought down and openly assist and Allie with kuffar againts muslims who kill muslims all over the world to be muslim after Allah has said that if you take them allies than you are one of them? Many ulama(scholars) have been locked in prison or killed for having this same aqida and making takfir againts these tawagheet and tyrants Now in Islam if we have two scholars that differ on something the ruling is we fallow the alim who has daleel(proof, evidence) from Quran and suna to back their claim Now as far as the pallace scholas who are close to the rulers something even though we are told to stay away from them have not provided any evidence or proof while the riteous Scholars have provide the Quran verses that I have mentioned as evidence and proof

[@tdackjordan5873]

@@Salafization1 The misunderstanding of kufr duna kufr The murjia of today have made us hear their weak arguments so often which bear witness of their foolishness. They try to spread their dirty misconceptions with their empty heads, including: "Judging by something other than what Allah has revealed is kufr duna kufr" This statement is mentioned in the books and is attributed to Ibn Abbas, the scholar of the ummah, radiya Allahu anhuma, that he would have said: "It is not like disbelief in Allah and His angels and prophets" but this does not belong To what Ibn Abbas has said, because it is an addition and it would have been said by Ibn Tawus. And this is evident when we look at all occurrences of this quote, because this wording "It's not as disbelief in Allah and His Angels and Prophets" has been mentioned in a version only and this is not from the words of Ibn Abbas, but it is more likely that this is an interpretation of the Aya by Ibn Tawus that he has taken from his father. The narration of Kufr duna kufr is weak! It is not confirmed that Ibn Abbas has said Kufr duna kufr. And the narration by Hisham bin Huyajr is munkar from several aspects. Firstly, Hisham is the only one who narrated it. Secondly, it is contrary to what others have said whom are more reliable. And there is also a version that says "it's kufr" and another wording: "it's kufr for him" meaning that the aya is meant in all cases kufr. This is mentioned by Al-Marwadhi in Ta'dhim Qadr Al-Salat 2/521 and Al-Hakim in 2/313 Al-Mustadrak via Hisham bin Hujayr via Tawus of Ibn Abbas. And Hisham was declared weak by Ahmad bin Hanbal and Al-Uqayli and Yahya bin Ma'een and others. Ali Al-Madeeni said, "I was reading a narration in front of Yahya bin Said: “Ibn Jurayj said Hisham bin Hujayr said:" Then Yahya bin Said said: I would leave him .. Then I said, so I should not take from his hadith? He said yes Sufyan bin Uyayna said: We dont take anything about Hisham bin Hujayr, which we also do not find mentioned by others. And this narration of kufr duna kufr was mentioned by Hisham bin Hujayr only and in addition to that: it violated what other reliable men have narrated, Abd Allah bin Tawus has narrated from his father that he asked Ibn Abbas about the words of Allah: "And who does not judge With what Allah has revealed: they are the unbelievers! (Al-Maida: 44) He replied, "It's Kufr" and in another narration: "It's Kufr for Him" ​​and in another: "It's enough kufr for him" mentioned by Abd Al-Razzaq in his tafsir 1/191 and by Ibn Jarir 6/256 and by Wakie 'in Akhbar Al-Qudat 1/41 and by others, with Sahih Isnad. And Ahmad bin Hanbal said about Hisham bin Hujayr: "He is not strong" And Makki said, "he is weak in hadith" And Said bin Yahya Al-Qattan said, "he is weak in hadith" and he rejected his ahadith. And Yahya bin Ma'een said, "Very weak" And Al-Bukhari has only mentioned 1 hadith of him as an addition to another hadith and not solitary because his hadith is no evidence, except as additional evidence for a correct narration. And Muslim has mentioned only 2 adiths from him as an addition to other ahadith and not isolated because he had a lot of fantasy and a bad memory. And Sufyan bin Uyayna said: We did not take from Hisham bin Hujayr anything which we do not find narrated by others, and this narration is not narrated by anyone other than Hisham. And the only ones mentioned ahadith of Hisham are those who were very easy (in mentioning weak ahadith) like Ibn Hibban and Al-Hakim. Thus it appears that this Hadith is weak because the great hadith scholars declared Hisham bin Hudjayr as weak. So think carefully because the people used this weak narration to twist and reject the words of Allah and his prophet ﷺ. And what is clearly proven is that Ibn Abbas-the same person of whom "kufr duna kufr" has been narrated- is also the one who mentioned the reason for the revelation of the words of Allah "And if you obey them you are polytheists" about obeying the mushrikin even if this is only in one single case concerning legal issues. "And if you obey them are your polytheists" (Al-Anam: 121) (وإن أطعتموهم إنكم لمشركون). Al-Hakim reported with a correct isnad that Ibn Abbas radiya Allahu anhu said that this aya was revealed in response to that some mushrikin discussed the matter of slaughter and the prohibition of eating cadavers; They said, You eat what you killed, but you do not eat what Allah has killed. So Allah said, "And if you obey them, you are polytheists." (Al-An’aam: 121) روى الحاكم بإسناد صحيح عنه رضي الله عنه انه قال إن ناساً من المشركين كانوا يجادلون المسلمين في مسالة الذبح وتحريم الميتة فيقولون تأكلون مما قتلتم ولاتأكلون مما قتل الله؟ ◁فقال تعالى :وان أطعتموهم إنكم لمشركون. This proves that anyone who makes laws or follows laws other than Allah's laws-even if it is in a single case- is a mushrik kafir. Even if it was correct that Ibn Abbas had said kufr duna kufr, it is still impossible to apply this to our current situation and current leaders (tawaghit) because this is obviously a wrong qiyas.

[@Anti-Incorrect]

I listened and learned but you didn't define who is a moslim ruler Can your ruler be kafer? في النواقض الكبرى للإسلام منها كما قال الإمام محمد بن عبدالوهاب رحمه الله: " مظاهرة المشركين ومعاونتهم على المسلمين، والدليل قوله تعالى: {..وَمَن يَتَوَلَّهُم مِّنكُمْ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْهُمْ إِنَّ اللّهَ لاَ يَهْدِي الْقَوْمَ الظَّالِمِينَ} [المائدة:51]. الشـرح المسألة الأولى: معنى هذا الناقض. أراد المصنف رحمه الله أن يبيِّن أن مظاهرة الكفار على المسلمين، هي أن يكون المسلم ظهيراً ونصيراً وعوناً للكفار على المسلمين، فينضم إليهم ويذب عنهم بالمال والسلاح والبيان، وهذا كفر أكبر مخرج من ملة الإسلام، ومظاهرة المشركين نوع من أنواع الموالاة لهم، وهي خيانة لله ولرسوله وللمؤمنين يستحق صاحبها سخط الله وأليم عذابه، قال تعالى: " {تَرَى كَثِيراً مِّنْهُمْ يَتَوَلَّوْنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ لَبِئْسَ مَا قَدَّمَتْ لَهُمْ أَنفُسُهُمْ أَن سَخِطَ اللّهُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَفِي الْعَذَابِ هُمْ خَالِدُونَ . وَلَوْ كَانُوا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِالله والنَّبِيِّ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْهِ مَا اتَّخَذُوهُمْ أَوْلِيَاء وَلَكِنَّ كَثِيراً مِّنْهُمْ فَاسِقُونَ} [المائدة:8081]. أرجو أن تقر من أي أراض انطلقت نيران من والى حكامكم من الصليبيين لقتل المسلمين في العراق وأفغانستان وباكستان والشام والموصل.. الموصل.. الموصل أطفلا ونساء وشيوخ ورجال كل ما أرادوه إعلاء كلمة الله.. لا بارك الله بالأشعرية قتلة أهل التوحيد أهل السنة والجماعة

[@q704]

أهل العلم يقسمون هذا ألى أقسام. لا يكون كل قسم كفر أكبر. ألم يخبر حاطب بن أبي بلتعة كفار قريش، و لم يكفره النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم، بينما حاطب أعان الكفار على المسلمين بهذا الفعل. و الظاهر أن النبي لم يكفره لأنه لم يعنهم لنصر دينهم، إنما فعله لأمر دنيوي. ثم، التكفير لأهل العلم، ليس الأمر أن كل من يظن أنه رأى الكفر، يكفر بذلك الحكام...

[@Andy-hi3yt]

Why not debate face to face brother?

[@great87]

We don't debate ignorant arrogant fools

[@cncmoh]

Well why don't you respond to Alislamproductions or bro hajji challenges?

[@Knowledgeandententertainment]

Bro hajji ? 🤣 Go to Ebn Hussain channels . Alhumdulillah Your boy has been smashed 🤣

[@nahianjalal]

Brother Abu Mussab already roasted them hard🤣

[@Ryan-lf6ds]

@@nahianjalal abu mussab got his a$$ handed to him. 🤣

[@great87]

​@@Ryan-lf6ds Cursing public, this is the problem with ignorance and foolishness, it gets people to buy 'adhaab in the hereafter.

[@evansherzad9992]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@izzi1931]

45:00

[@mohammedxiii]

Even by his own admission, this person enjoys "debating". Difference between evidence and "buy my course to learn more for $120". JazakAllahu Khairan for putting this out.

[@muhammadislam9379]

Imam Ahmad went against rulers, but you couldn't refute that. But just speaking irrelevant matters.

[@Salafization1]

So you watched an hour long video within 10 minutes of it's upload? Just shows the lack of sincerity and hawaa you follow.

[@muhammadislam9379]

He talked about Imam Ahmad at the very beginning. I stopped the lecture and commented. Started again. Your job is to find faults of others.

[@s6045]

@@muhammadislam9379yet you’re a fan of Daniel who only does that. Such hypocrisy Subhan’Allah

[@ibnAlOusoudAlHassani]

It's obvious to me that you don't know the story of shaykh al islam Ahmad ibn Hanbal

[@ibnAlOusoudAlHassani]

Allah said: يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ O you who believe, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Surat al-Nisa 4:59 Ibn Umar reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: السَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ عَلَى الْمَرْءِ الْمُسْلِمِ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ وَكَرِهَ مَا لَمْ يُؤْمَرْ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَإِذَا أُمِرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَلَا سَمْعَ وَلَا طَاعَةَ Listening to and obeying the leader is an obligation upon a Muslim, whether he likes it or dislikes it, as long as he is not commanded to disobey Allah. If he is commanded to disobey, then there is no listening or obedience. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2796, Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my tradition (sunnah). Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body. I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said: تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847, Grade: Sahih Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you. It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said: لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855, Grade: Sahih

[@Richest_Person_in_the_World]

Handspan (shibr)

[@brenda726]

back and forth over hadiths lol. for anyone reading hadiths are separate to the quran and are a bunch of hearsay narrations, it is what extremist groups follow and rely on. Earliest one is over 200 years after prophet mohammeds time (pbuh). impossible to play chinese whispers for that long

[@ex-muslimtestimonies001]

A lot of bootlickers this days 😂😂

[@Salafization1]

Better than being a ka.fir cross licker.

[@ex-muslimtestimonies001]

@@Salafization1 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

[@Salafization1]

@@ex-muslimtestimonies001 OK cross worshipper.

[@ex-muslimtestimonies001]

@@Salafization1 We don’t worship the cross but the One who died for us and rose again! “He himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.”

[@saoud_alahbabi]

@@ex-muslimtestimonies001 God is ever living, how can he die? 1 Timothy 6:16 ICB God is the only One who never dies. He lives in light so bright that men cannot go near it. No one has ever seen God, or can see him. May honor and power belong to God forever. Amen. Even if he rose again, simply dying contradicts the notion that he is ever living and cannot die, why don’t you go figure out your religion first instead of commenting here?

[@zulqarnain401]

Merry Christmas Santa Claus!