Boris Spassky vs Robert James Fischer "Fischer King" Spassky - Fischer World Championship Match (1972) · 0-1 #chess #chessgame #bobbyfischer #borisspassky
Пікірлер: 288
@joseluisperezruiz13125 ай бұрын
Nadie podrá jamás superar a Bobby. Porque lo hizo solo, sin la ayuda de nadie. Kasparov, karpov, carlsen y otros tuvieron ayuda de grandes entrenadores, incluso de su familia y el gobierno. Bobby ni siquiera su familia ni el gobierno de su país le ayudó. Llegó en taxi a jugar el campeonato del mundo contra la escuela Soviética de ajedrez. Y les ganó a todos. Además ha jugado el ajedrez más perfecto de todos los tiempos. Por estas razones y otras más nadie le llega ni a los talones al gran Bobby. El único que supera a Bobby es el ajedrez mismo. Robert James Fischer: "EL MAS GRANDE".
@conjured_up_skeletons61783 күн бұрын
Bobby ajedrecista- Leyenda, Bobby ser humano - suciedad
@eduardnovac42207 ай бұрын
Fisher the whole game played on the edge. So much tension.
@adamlv18 ай бұрын
Fischer managed to corner Spassky with pawns. They locked his king in place not just because he would put himself in check, but if he was to try and move away even one square then Fischer gets his queen back on the board and the position of the queen when restored would have led to a check mate. Incredible game. Using the weakest pieces on the board to beat him. It seems almost impossible.
@Eli-uu4vt7 ай бұрын
He also locked at least one of Spassky's Rooks at the back row with those same pawns for a large portion of the match. After the two had traded queens, Fischer had more pawn development to keep throwing them at Spassky's back row to regain his queen and Spassky had to keep a Rook there as protection. So Spassky was essentially playing with one arm tied behind his back the whole time.
@Lambert77857 ай бұрын
- a truly incredible game
@adamlv17 ай бұрын
There is an unbelievably good video on KZbin called Deep Blue in the series Down the Rabbit Hole on the channel Frederik Knudsen. About the computer that went against the best player in the world, Gerry Kasparov. The back and forth they have is fascinating and some of the greatest chess matches ever. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqipY2VvipeVl5osi=Q5U4Fn6ce8BT_f8R
@SantosSantos-bf5szАй бұрын
checkmate
@jamesmarshall74164 ай бұрын
Every time I think one of them had seized the momentum the other one pulls out a brilliant defensive move. What a battle of attrition!
@gottadomor74388 ай бұрын
Fischer & Spaasky. I feel like I'm in church - chess church - watching their matches. And bravo BRAVO the music accompaniment - as beautiful as the game itself.
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
Yes: both men are using powerful gifts given to them by GOD - and not for a destructive purpose! Additionally, they had profound respect for each other - not just for the game. Boris had to perform for Russia - but Bobby just performed because that is what he was: a Chessman.
@SantosSantos-bf5szАй бұрын
music if you have insomnia
@conjured_up_skeletons61783 күн бұрын
Come testify brotha!!
@mpg97887 ай бұрын
Between 1970 -1972, no one in any era could have beaten him. He was the greatest chess player to ever live. He defeated the Soviets all by himself, no computers, and no cheating.
@RaineriHakkarainen6 ай бұрын
Fischer beat the weakest chess world champion Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Capablanca would beat the blunder maker Spassky 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Magnus Carlsen would beat weakest Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! You can not lose 11 times against awful Spassky!
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
@@RaineriHakkarainen and Mpg9788 Bobby played the man who was put before him by the Soviets. He would have played anyone. He was not playing against the Soviets....or against Russia (or against the Soviets in Russia). Bobby did not create the news hype - and did not like it much, either.
@ahmedabdullah89097 күн бұрын
You are delusional, he didn't play vs Karpov.
@gennadydolgov31998 ай бұрын
In history of chess there was nothing like that game. M. Botvinnik
@PLASKETT79 ай бұрын
The greatest chess regret of my life is that, when conversing with Kavalek in a London hotel in 1987 I, for some mad reason, did not question him about his work with Fischer on the adjournment analysis of this the magnificent thirteenth game. For Kavalek became Fischer´s second in Rekyavik, Short did subsequently tell me that Lubosh told him that he had taught Fischer how to play the Richter Rauzer system Vs Spassky´s Classical Sicilian, though. A line Fischer deployed in the eighteenth and twentieth games.
@edwardfoye67848 ай бұрын
Had Bobby ever played Alekhine's before? Amazing to think that opening was considered playable at that level
@SevenCostanza8 ай бұрын
The greatest chess regret. Never thought I'd hear someone say that
@valerii-tz9il2 ай бұрын
Фишер - Гений Шахматного поля
@dannygjk9 ай бұрын
I remember a lot of people's minds exploded when Fischer changed up his openings for this match.
@781DavidАй бұрын
I've got a book on the match somewhere, the author did note that numerous Soviet grandmasters would have been going through Fischer's favourite openings. And Bobby refused to play them.
@petersiegfriedkrug8 ай бұрын
Really great game. Robert Fisher was one of the greatest. This game is so amazing!!
@texasskyliner7044 ай бұрын
Not one of the greatest. The greatest.
@salinagrrrl69Ай бұрын
@@texasskyliner704But an odd bird. Tends to be that with outstanging ones.
@maanmohammad84598 ай бұрын
Unbelievable.What a beautiful game.A master piece
@Jack-kz4nb3 ай бұрын
And Boris Spassky stood up and applauded him
@renetrost2711Ай бұрын
That was another Game. The Game where Bobby opened with 1) c4
@anatoliy33239 ай бұрын
Robert Fisher is the greatest chessmaster in all over the world. Bobby, you are for ver in my heart!
@tk67298 ай бұрын
Nowhere near Kasparov.
@tweegeTX38 ай бұрын
Shit guy thou
@honkymonky70338 ай бұрын
Kasparov had a lot of grand master to help him first and then computers. Bobby was alone by himself
@vibovitold7 ай бұрын
@@honkymonky7033computers helped his opponents too, so this cancels eachother out
@vibovitold7 ай бұрын
@@tk6729Kasparov wins in terms of longevity, by far,, but Fischer's level of dominance (short-lived as it was) has never been equalled by anybody. not to mention Kasparov came from a country where chess culture flourished, he attended Botvinnik's academy (a 5 times world champion). Fischer didn't have such resources at all. he singlehandedly took on an empire.
@cryptohalloffame9 ай бұрын
enjoy the chess without commentary, enlightening, you can see their game unfolding
@robertstewart2398 ай бұрын
My sentiments exactly. You can watch the game without all the might haves, could haves, should haves and at a speed that is comfortable to watch. Well done.
@phillipadams46918 ай бұрын
I also enjoy it more this way. It's like watching a movie without someone explaining the plot.
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
@@phillipadams4691 👍
@parasuraman11559 ай бұрын
Fischer makes it seem so easy! Lovely game👏
@airkuna8 ай бұрын
Easy? He hardly won.
@farmergiles10657 ай бұрын
@@airkuna Or you might say he deftly outmaneuvered a world champion, seeing more deeply into the positions of the game, and luring his opponent into a most unapparent trap, all the while appearing to be in trouble. But he wasn't. Unmatched mastery defies all appearances!
@dancingtrout67192 ай бұрын
hes light as a Feather
@chrishimmelmann6 ай бұрын
I was 12 when I replayed that game, almost traumatized when dreaming of getting rolled over by black pawn chains while trying to push my game on the other side of the board. 51 years after, I still hold this was the greatest game of chess fought over the board in a World Championship. Clearly not free of errors, but what a fight!
@rg18097 ай бұрын
I love the comments by the "Chess Experts" here who find multiple blunders by the best two chess players of their day. If I see a blunder, I just accept that I don't see the brilliance of the move.
@IMAHMS8 ай бұрын
Spassky made several mistakes, Bobby never makes a mistake, that is why one mistake against Bobby and you are lost.
@juanbojanich9 ай бұрын
Que nivel de juego 👏👏👏👏👏
@janlavcharivmakhgalsuren61279 ай бұрын
Epic game
@jamestolles23539 ай бұрын
Is there commentary available for this game?
@initiativapartidulpensionarivu9 ай бұрын
12:52 0 - 1
@albertocastro75927 ай бұрын
Batalla hasta el último aliento
@mfburk20109 ай бұрын
How difficult would it be to tell us which game this was? They played 20.
@mfburk20109 ай бұрын
@Francisco ParraBobby Fischer LOST the first game of the 1972 WCC.
@stevestone65548 ай бұрын
It was the thirteenth game.
@zeked42007 ай бұрын
@@FranciscoParra-im9pi Ouch...do you feel enlightened? 😂
@rekilfc83638 ай бұрын
There was so many moves I didn’t understand.
@dancingtrout67192 ай бұрын
of course
@CharliePhelps-sb7hp10 күн бұрын
Spassky was spastic he did not take the rook in the corner with his black Bishop
@Baseds_Backup_Account8 ай бұрын
God how I wish Bobby was still around to this day. Then again, he wouldn't survive in this era with all the crap going on and such tbh, unfortunately. As he was barely able to survive back then with all the shit going on and how he was and such.
@thomashenry32848 ай бұрын
Hi, this is the most incredible and easy-to-understand tutorial on chord & chord-building. THANK YOU!!!
@CharliePhelps-sb7hp10 күн бұрын
At one point in the game is stasky had taken the damn rook in the corner he would have won by taking the rook in the corner with his black Bishop Fisher would have been forced to take the bishop with his other rook and then spassky promotes the pawn add Fisher has to take the pawn which was promoted then stasky takes the last rook of fishers and Fisher is down two rooks for a bishop and a pawn. As I said spassky was spastic
@okilshuhaoou82914 ай бұрын
two greatest ❤
@adagiooigada77232 ай бұрын
Музыка какая-то депрессивная... Пришлось полностью звук убрать.
@markmorris767 ай бұрын
Well I'm a novice, but why didn't Spassky play for draw?
@jorge678318 ай бұрын
Após 41 anos ao vermos uma partida brilhante mostra q Fischer foi e ainda é o maior gênio do xadrez vivo ou morto 😂
@hart639 ай бұрын
Which game number is this?
@romanpopov34198 ай бұрын
Я посредственный шахматист, но по-моему Спасский допустил несколько неточностей.
@MohamedSaid-km7rm2 ай бұрын
raymond reddington acknowledged it in the blacklist "Sacrifice the bishop"
@joaomachadoxavier4922 ай бұрын
Que partida maravilhosa!
@aclvaz8 ай бұрын
At 11:13 should be Rg1 f4 Kb2 Kd4
@CharliePhelps-sb7hp10 күн бұрын
😊 perhaps spassky thought that chest is like a night at the ballet when in fact it is more like a knife fight in a phone booth. He was playing chess like my 3-year-old daughter he knows how the pieces move but he was just playing dolls instead of playing smash mouth chess
@adamdesanti67138 ай бұрын
Wow, these guys are good.
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
@adam 😁👍Yes.... (at the very least)!😁👍
@DoctorBrute8 ай бұрын
Bobby Fischer is a magician
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
I would say extraordinarily gifted - and CONFIDENT!!!!!
@joaopedroriff69933 ай бұрын
Why he resigned??
@sabuem941627 күн бұрын
There was no need to resigned at that position
@charleshendrix232Ай бұрын
Fisher was the best ever. But Spassky was a fantastic player. Just beautiful to watch and very poignant because, if not for Fisher, Spassky may be the greatest ever.
@awingedbaby4 ай бұрын
I played games with my dad who play against grand masters... I would get so bored as my dad studied the board I'd just make moves to end the game... and get out of the room.
@thelmatucker75985 күн бұрын
I saw blunders and missed chances on both sides. I feel chess ready to take on either player.
@geri07566 ай бұрын
Super Spiel.
@idx19415 ай бұрын
I don't understand why Spassky, at 11:20, did not move his rook down to the back row. While it's true that he would likely lose his last pawn, Fischer would still have trouble moving his pawns.
@Kai048347 ай бұрын
6:23 am i wrong or did Fisher just hanged the rook right there?
@joshdarius59958 ай бұрын
Spassky was good too
@gottadomor74388 ай бұрын
And a better man than chess player.
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
@@gottadomor7438 Well...certainly more emotionally stable! But he did not like Bobby just because he is a good man - he liked Bobby because he connected with something deeply good in Bobby, too👍
@disuser-lp3qv1tm8f7 ай бұрын
Watching this as a beginner, there so many moves from Fischer that seemed illogical. It looks as if he's sacrificing his important pieces way too easily, only to realize that near the end he just overwhelmed Spassky with "mere" footsoldiers. It's almost demoralizing for a beginner, let alone for a grandmaster!
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
That would be to Bobby's advantage: feeling demoralized did not seem to enter into his own strategic play...he aimed for the opponents mistakes and pounced at an unexpected time!!!
@alexwells94349 ай бұрын
I don't understand why Fischer pushed his H pawn up only to let it get eaten. I feel like Fischer was trolling Spassky here
@robertogonzalez-dn3np9 ай бұрын
La torre cortaba el paso al Rey, por eso entrega el peón h y luego puede apoyar su peón f con el rey
@MaltePhilippA8 ай бұрын
To pull the rook over and open the d file for his king to pass through which allowed him to escort the passed pawn on the e file towards promotion causing Spassky's defense to be spread too thin - which eventually won him the game.
@gigagerard8 ай бұрын
Idiotic move, Fischer created a way forward for his king, but Spasski could easily have drawn with his rook on the third rank 69. Rc3♱ instead he played 69. Rd1♱ RIP
@youyie2227 күн бұрын
Because his black king can go on the e column and join the f pawn and go to the promotion. Spassky as no defense against that.
@GV-Entertainment-Show10 ай бұрын
Nice game
@hamatarafauniversal103710 ай бұрын
Спасский ошибся в нескольких местах
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
Fischer has always admitted that his "secret" was "taking advantage of his opponents mistakes." But that does mean he had to be able to recognize mistakes as they happened....and knew how to profit from them! Bobby was quite a character.❤
@bunpeishiratori584910 ай бұрын
Should be 0-1 rather than 1-0.
@gleekhan9 ай бұрын
ME , too THINKS saMe ,,, bt VHEN PLAING ....APP NEVEL told ...HOV VHEN and vHELE MISTAKE ....?? CLCIK n ID mole IS added IF CHECKED BEFoLE.....not , MINE , LIVES ,, MCH EXPLAINNED ......HV Lobbed all cash , and make me and son LOOK good FOL nothing , JMP n ME .....ALL LIFE ME COOKED ..HIDED...........GETTING>>>LEADIEE>>F0l...1980s..ALMIEE......all.....deeds.....vith...ovn...HANDS.........
@hart639 ай бұрын
The American way is to put the winner as one first. Your hint is one won then the other lost
@mfburk20109 ай бұрын
@@hart63The correct way is still 0-1 to show that Black won. This has always been the standard in annotations.
@kakhak8 ай бұрын
Hater degenerate.
@vitaliysilchenko89498 ай бұрын
100%
@davidzambrana82754 ай бұрын
Bobby recordado con gran cariño en todo el mundo hubiera superado tanto a karpov como a kasparov, pero el mismo reconoció que el maestro supremo del ajedrez es el gran Morphy.
@igorravnjakovic32977 ай бұрын
which game was this?
@philippberry49007 ай бұрын
Why is it blacked out?
@ShineOnYouCD7 ай бұрын
I'm not good at chess. Why did he resign at the end?
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
Just to avoid humiliation. Do not forget: he had the KGB watching his every move, too - better for their player to jump off the tracks immediately... at least that showed them that he was able to avoid being smashed by the train.
@syourke37 ай бұрын
Music is extremely distracting. Can’t concentrate on the game.
@conjured_up_skeletons61783 күн бұрын
Hey, these guys seem good. They should like play in FIDE or something
@hiiq3232328 ай бұрын
I thought Fisher blundered his rook on h8 to be taken by White's Bishop for free. Did I miss something there?
@ulf-christof_engel7 ай бұрын
Yes.
@hiiq3232327 ай бұрын
@@ulf-christof_engel So what did I miss?
@thomaszanzal78463 ай бұрын
As I watch the game unfold , I get happy when I say to myself , ""Oh, I would move this piece here. """ and then these masters proceed to do exactly what I would of done. I was right in that my moves mirrored their moves about 70% of the time. The other 30% -- well I am not a grandmaster. My problem with chess is when I play I get point greedy , meaning I will always grab an opponents higher valued piece sacrificing my lower valued piece and by so doing throw away a good position through that greed. It seems these grand master never ever do that. They value position over mere points. They never sacrifice a lower valued piece for a higher value piece if it opens up or destroys the power positioning of the pieces on the board.
@eugeniometak2863 ай бұрын
Boris vs "Bobby"?! More correct is "Boria" vs Robert
@nanthakumarrr8 ай бұрын
But why wasn't Bobby developing B pawn ?
@hebertoolvera89463 ай бұрын
Sin esa música se disfrutaría mejor la partida
@user-zr4yf3lj5f5 ай бұрын
Datoria externă se plăteşte cu datoria internă. Munţii sau stelele zboară.
@NeoBerliner4 ай бұрын
11:24 Why not Spassky's Tower H1 to H8?🤦🏻
@bmoresweetz70234 ай бұрын
Yea instead of checking Bobby right I knew I couldn't have been the only one that spotted that 😏 Nice find I love these type of game plays it allows you to see 👀 what could've been done better in order to get ahead faster n win out the game
@jonatanaka7134Ай бұрын
I don't get it. There is a black tower. Tg8×Th8. Oh! Now I get it. Indeed! He could have won.
@neo33733 ай бұрын
Le pion prend le fou, Le cheval prend la Tour, La Reine prise par le toi, Partouououze....!
@zequi5976Ай бұрын
Unglaublich was gäbe Gottes ist was dieser Spieler auf Schachbrett erkennen und sehen ist für mich unbegreiflich der liebe Gott kann wirklich alles erschaffen was er will
@camiloformigosa652210 ай бұрын
The name of music , please
@user-oy8gi6ft4u9 ай бұрын
Aymen Atef - Galctic Resonance Escapade
@letsgobrandon62818 ай бұрын
Giving up his queen. Wow
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
Yeah ..... He knew he could make more of them 😂
@tomaccuphose5535Ай бұрын
6:21 why dont take the Rock with Bishop?
@maradona1503 ай бұрын
At 13:02 Spaski should have move his rook to A1 and game over.
@timpulprobabil4 ай бұрын
Natura, poate fi răspunsul pământului!
@ericday45059 ай бұрын
I am a chess novice, and people that I really admire love this game and the strategy of it, but I have a question, I guess Fisher was considered maybe the greatest all time, maybe debatable, but could he have beaten Kasparov?
@luizscherer28509 ай бұрын
Probably yes. We will never know.
@yuriystruykin38499 ай бұрын
Fischer couldn 't beat Kasparov . I argue that Karpov was stronger than Fischer , which is why Fischer refused to play with Karpov for fear of losing to him . Kasparov , as we know , turned out to be stronger than Karpov , according to this logic , we can assume that Kasparov is stronger than Fischer . Fischer was lucky that by the will of fate he fought for the chess crown with Boris Spassky . Boris Spassky was at that time , although a strong player , but by nature Spassky was a lazy person and did not like to overwork himself in chess !! And as we understand it , this is a big minus for a chess player , because in the fight for the world title , sometimes you need to be able to mobilize all your strength ! But Boris Spassky is not one of those players who will fight to the seventh sweat without sparing either himself or his opponent . Boris Spassky at that time was the most convenient opponent for Fischer , God rewarded Fischer with Spassky for his great efforts and aspirations in chess knowledge . I am convinced that Karpov and Kasparov were stronger than Fischer at that time , Karpov 's strength is in his extraordinary calmness no matter what , Karpov always keeps a cool head and this is his big plus ! But Kasparov is Kasparov ! At that time , Soviet chess players were very strong , I want to say again that he was very lucky that he played with Spassky ! Spassky was at that time the weakest link among Soviet chess players .
@robmorr238 ай бұрын
Anatoly Karpov never gets the credit he deserves. The 2 ks played 5 matches, 150 or 160 games and Kasparov won only 2 more games. Karpov is described as a boa constrictor, but in the 1960s and 1970s he was a brilliant attacker. I'm 58 in a few months so I grew up with Karpov as one of my heroes. The 2 k's played each other after the 5 world championships. They're co-equals.
@ericday45058 ай бұрын
@@yuriystruykin3849 You make a blanket statement, that Fisher was afraid to lose to Karpov, so he didn't play him. First you don't know that you think that, and that still doesn't say he would lose to either of them.
@yuriystruykin38498 ай бұрын
@@ericday4505 My dear friend, I am 100% sure that Fischer was afraid of losing to Karpov, and he was not afraid in vain ! Of course Fischer is a genius , there is no doubt about it ! But Karpov at that time was still stronger than Fischer ! The Soviet chess school was then the strongest in the world ! Fischer was a self - taught genius ! Do you know what else is very important here ? Fischer would have had to fight not just against Karpov , but he would have had to fight against the entire chess machine of the Soviet Union !!! And this is a very powerful force at that time !!! Fischer did not have such a powerful support at that time ! Behind the scenes , Karpov against Fischer would have been helped by the best Soviet chess players at that time ! Do you understand? Do you remember when Karpov won against Korchnoi , who was very , very strong at that time ? But why? But because Karpov was helped by a powerful machine called the Soviet Union !!! There was a moment when the coaches realized that Karpov was not tired much and the best resorts of the Soviet Union were at Karpov 's service , where he was able to have a good rest from chess and gain new strength to fight Korchnoi and eventually defeated him ! The machine called the Soviet Union was very clever and powerful at that time ! Something like that my dear friend )
@Peter-9764 ай бұрын
Fischer played that game exactly as how I would have played it. I actually thought he was copying my every move!
@varunkrishnan93743 ай бұрын
Did he miss an early check mate chance
@john580112 ай бұрын
Missed opportunity by Spassky on move 25. He played Qc3 but rejected e5-e6. All the complications favour white after this move e5-e6….needs exact defence for ages. One mistake after that white wins.
@adamlv17 ай бұрын
Any of the great games between two brilliant minded chess players would be material that you could probably study for years and still not have a comprehension for the how they played the game. But this one in particular is absolutely crazy. Boris Spassky had a higher player rating at the time of this game, at least I am pretty sure that was the case due to Spassky being more active. But there’s a cat and mouse game happening and there is a specific point in the game when Spassky was smiling and was gearing his thinking toward putting Fischer away. And all of a sudden with a combination of one or two moves the mouse became the cat and it was ready to pounce.
@vibovitold7 ай бұрын
"Boris Spassky had a higher player rating at the time of this game" did he? interesting. in fact, when the 1972 WC started, Spassky was rated 2660, and Fischer - 2785. that's a 125 points gap. in fact, the largest EVER between #1 and #2. for comparison, it's LARGER than the gap between the current #1 (Carlsen) and #28; on the most recent rating list. let that sink in. that's how dominant Fischer was.
@RaineriHakkarainen6 ай бұрын
Fischer beat the weakest chess world champion Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! Capablanca would beat the blunder maker Spassky 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Magnus Carlsen would beat awful Spassky 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! You can not lose 11 times really bad Spassky! Caruana scored the highest tournament elo rating ever 3080 in St Louis 8,5/10! Fischer and Kasparov their highest tournament elo rating is 2990 only! Karpov scored 11/13 in Linares 1994 elo score 3040! Alekhine in San Remo in 1930 elo rating 3040!! Kasparov and Fischer can not be the greatest with poor 2990 tournament elo score!
@SuperBartles8 ай бұрын
Er massive blunders in this one. Fischer getting his rook trapped, and then Spassky letting him get away with it :)
@sergiogaleano41858 ай бұрын
All of that was planed
@bigmike29106 ай бұрын
@6:23 why doesn't white bishop take rook at h8
@bruhmeowduseАй бұрын
music?
@KOl-xj4jt6 ай бұрын
plays with black very good trapping white while attacking
@markburnham75122 ай бұрын
Much better if there was human commentary.
@hrishikeshmoghe5 ай бұрын
But why did he resign? Can someone please explain?
@youyie2227 күн бұрын
Fischer is going to take the bishop, if not he going to check the black king with his tower. And the paws will win.
@2BrothersWorld8 ай бұрын
Spasky played like a baby . He could won this match
@ralffranz33843 ай бұрын
Zwei Weltklasse Spieler welche vom eigenen politischen System bestraft wurden
@AntarticaProject6 ай бұрын
Seeing the story, since Spassky wons first 2 matches, how is possible 0-1? Just to undestand, which match is this? The third one?
@john580112 ай бұрын
Game 13. Put Bobby three points up.
@alexpopov8597 ай бұрын
Какая то хрень… почему было не взять черную ладью на Н8 белым слоном? 🤔да и вообще, какой-то венегрет
@user-kr2cg5kf6n3 ай бұрын
Тоже пересматривал и не понял.
@warrenchu63197 ай бұрын
@2:46 Why didn't White Pawn to C4? Guess I'm too dumb to understand.
@raulibarra96228 ай бұрын
No mames las Nebraska lo tenian desde la Mitac del juego
@ma786448 ай бұрын
Boa
@christinemurray144416 күн бұрын
If Spassky resigned then it's not 1-0 but 0-1, as he was white in this game.
@XssMaxzzSg3 ай бұрын
Who win?Spaasky?
@landrover-ib7woАй бұрын
H8? Rook would be gone with queen promotion
@QUINCEYJONES008 ай бұрын
I had Bobby loosing . Made a few blunders
@rmp74006 ай бұрын
@Quincy Yeah... there were a couple of moves/delays that could be debated - because we did not know what was in Bobby's MIND at the time!!! He did not play reflexively.... and he sure was not hesitant to sacrifice a Queen!!!
@bmoresweetz70234 ай бұрын
I agree 💯 they actually both made slight blunders no more than one or two at the most Boris did one that kind a cost him to surrender the game
@kakhak8 ай бұрын
There never been better Chess person on Earth after Fisher to date.