Bourdieu habitus and cultural capital

[@garethrice1266]

It's good to have habitus defined and related to the other conceptual apparatus. Thanks very much 👍

[@user-wk2xk7gi8k]

Great thank you. This is really helpful. God bless you.

[@maggiejones7770]

Thank you for this!!!

[@sarakose5104]

Really helpful! Thank you :)

[@antoniomartinezarboleda3028]

Very clear and useful. Amazing

[@NandaHardaPratamaMeiji]

thanks for a clearly explanation, it helps a lot

[@RoyAlexander]

great thanks

[@jmarsh205]

ref 3:04 - "symbolic violence includes actions" - can this include language, such as the performative dangers of using particular language. An example I can think of is racial subjugation by referring to a 'riot' that black people are engaged in. Alternatively, 'uprisings' implies much less. So in this example, is it correct of me to see 'riot' in such a context being a form of symbolic violence?

[@poifish7442]

In the first place symbolic violence has much less to do with specific language, instead having to do with a general, internalised power dynamic within the social hierarchy. In this case u could consider black people BEING VIEWED as more dangerous, so as to warrant the phrasing used in this example to be a form of symbolic violence, with the language itself being nothing more than a tool used to sustain it

[@jmarsh205]

@@poifish7442 Okay I see, thank you.