BRAND NEW Sigma 24-70 DG DN II ART

Get It Here: geni.us/Si247i or geni.us/Sig2470IIAdo
Video Shot With:
ZV-E1: geni.us/SnyFav or geni.us/ZVE1Ador
Sony 16-25 G: geni.us/Sony1625Ado
Audio Hollyland Lark Max: geni.us/hollylandlarkmaxMark
All Above Links Are Affiliate Links to Make Me Stinking Rich.
Time Stamps:
0:00 Intro
1:15 Build Quality
2:42 Sharpness
3:20 Bokeh and Bokeh Balls
4:21 Flare Ghosting and Coma
4:40 Chromatic Aberration and LOCA
5:35 Linear Focus
5:52 Sun Stars
6:03 Autofocus
6:38 Focus Breathing
7:15 Minimum Focus Distance
8:00 Price
8:20 Why Buy The 24-70 GM II?
#SIGMA #SIGMA2470mm #sony

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Get It Here: geni.us/Sig2470IIAdo or geni.us/Sig2470IIBH All Above Links Are Affiliate Links to Make Me Stinking Rich.

[@giusetup]

The comedy of these vids is just... perfect

[@markwiemels]

The audio in this video is excellent.

[@markwiemels]

I bet people would love to get audio that sounds this good, but some jerk didn’t put links in the description.

[@DaveSoltura]

@MarkBennettCameraCrisis is that the Hollyland Lark M2?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Close!! Hollyland Lark Max

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

I'm going to ask that jerk to add it

[@z352kdaf8324]

It's sounds bad on my S22U. Coming in av little hot

[@RandumbTech]

As you mentioned toward the end, the biggest reason to buy native Sony lenses is they perform better with Sony IBIS. It’s a huge difference in video mode. For stills, this lens is an instant buy. Great review!

[@andrademeza]

"he thinks im mr.beast" "NO I DONT" lmaoo

[@frankiefeliciano5818]

Needs to be said louder and more often

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

😂

[@ralphjurgen9456]

Perfect timing, just got into full frame and just starting with my lens collection.

[@an_o_ia]

I really love your humor! Perfect Videos The Bokeh Balls are really nice😊

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Thanks!!

[@tiagoshoots_]

Nice!!! Thanks for sharing your experience ✌️👏👏

[@waisamu4502]

Thank you for the very good presentation.

[@jbello9398]

Yes I'm definitely ordering it

[@smoke362]

It is and i did pick it up. Great review

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

an amazing lens

[@yoboogieman]

I''m going for it!

[@johnbrock678]

I don’t need this lens, but watched the entire video. I just really enjoy your content and presentation skills. Your exceptional good looks are also a draw.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

this is how everyone should be 🤣

[@enjoygary]

Please review the sigma f2 lenses

[@kostasrestas]

i was really close to buy the 1st one but, many people complain for dust dots into the glass that was very easy to have. Like a walk in the park was enough.. hope now Sigma fix this..

[@wakeywarrior]

That ZVE1 footage looks sweet.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Such a great camera

[@21Virtues]

I am going to get this one!

[@chosenideahandle]

Excellent.... video 😁.

[@acpirola]

Another great great video. Personally I would go with the Sigma. The Sony’s “extra features” wouldn’t help me much. Again, great video! Thank you Mr. Beast!!!

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

😂😂Call me, Jimmy

[@acpirola]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis😂😂😂

[@lamb8648]

Wow just as I’ve been nearing my purchase for the GM II .. this is definitely a worthy contender, that price sure is something 😭. The Sony body + first party lens is what might ultimately sell me to the g master (as well as the bokeh, but the sigma’s is extremely impressive for the price point) but now I have to sit on it for a bit.

[@brugj03]

If you consider this lens, check out the fotos really well, i think sigma is very hard and flat with a bluish hue you can`t get rid of in post. Be warned.

[@jl9752]

Great review! How well does it track subject in video while zooming in and out? Thanks!

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

autofocus tracking and zooming is flawless

[@tommilano5431]

Love the ending “he thinks I’m Mr beast. I am”

[@FitnessToForest]

absolutely buying this! Using your link as well so you can get stinkin rich lol

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

thanks for thinking of me!!

[@headshotmaster3401]

sooooooo goooooood!

[@jesperjensen4265]

One handsome freshly cut mofo, right there! ❤️

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

🤣

[@stevenwaldstein2249]

Thanks for the video. Just late for me since I already own the GM II but I’m sure some will be attractive to many. Also I own the GM II holy trinity so when will Sigma have the other two lenses to their users the full experience? Take care.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

yes - they definitely need to complete that

[@kevinl8791]

Question for videographers, which one would you choose, Sony 24-105 f4 OSS vs new sigma 24-70 mark 2 f2.8? btw I’m using a Sony zv-e1, thanks!! 🙌

[@bdvisuals_]

The only thing I don't like about my Sigma 24-70 is the lens extending but other than that I love it

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

yeah - same with the Sony - I prefer internal zoom myself - but it does keep it more compact

[@gigacolorscapes1859]

Any Fujifilm 16-50 lens review here? Everybody is reviewing this lens.

[@bradl2636]

Yes, Sony cannot justify its prices at this point.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Sigma have equalled them in most ways at lower prices for sure

[@SperS-222]

Different quality

[@tonvati5482]

Hey, thanks for the review; is there a problem with the chapter points? To me it seems as if each is in origin the step before, beginning with "par focal"? Greetings from germany :)

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

yes - need to make a correction - thanks!!

[@neeru_vlogs]

hey mark, I'm Indian masters student in USA. I'm watching your videos for a while, they are fantastic and I learn a lot from them. I newly started photography and video making with ZVe10 + sony 18-105 f4 (i like the long range) & kit lens. How well do you think the camera set works for me ?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

it is a great setup

[@JoATTech]

This is the only lens I do not own (24-70 F2.8). Maybe it's time :D

[@AprilClayton]

I need 24 on the wide end. I love the Sigma 28-70, but 28 leaves me a bit tight often enough. I got the Sony 24-240, and it is wonderful for travel.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

makes a big difference, the 24

[@simonc4764]

So for none Sony E mount camera the Sigma is better?

[@AsdAsd-yo2jx]

Nice

[@imboredDB]

Hi Mark, can or will you do more tests videos on this lense?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

I already had to send it back to sigma. I hope to do some more comparisons with it on another date

[@derekjohn357]

Hi Mark, Is this lens any good for an APS-C camera such as the a6700; in particular for potential gig photography? Thanks

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

you can use it, yes, but there are better options for apsc in my opinion. This is a pretty big and expensive lens. Getting something like a Tamron 17-70 2.8 or the Sigma 18-50 2.8 would be a better fit in my opinion. Better size and way better price with still spectacular results.

[@allania277]

Why the Front element is always bigger at 82mm if the rest of the body could be 77mm for example?

[@IntrovertAmateur]

Damn this lens looks so good, specially for the L mount. For Sony I would keep an eye out for an used GMII and pay the few extra hundred $ for the reasons you mentioned, in Germany sometimes you can get one in mint condition around 1800$ (including taxes). Btw I laughed so hard at the end, unfortunately my baby daughter woke up 😅😂 You are definitely the Mr. Beast of camera crisis 😁😉

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

oh no - baby wake!!

[@AaronFigueroa1]

This reminds me of the sony 10-20 f4 but then sigma comes with 10-18 f2.8 Sigma for the win 🏆 I have maybe 3 sony lenses the rest are 3rd party sigma tamron and viltrox you can’t beat the price to performance these days with 3rd party

[@WavesNM]

Dammit Mark you're about to cost me money again! Awesome review

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

What's money compared to lenses??

[@hikertrashfilms]

24mm F1.2 DG DN Art will be the lens of the year, 2024

[@PhotoTrekr]

If the 24-70 f2 GM is released this year, it will be interesting to see how it's priced.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

and the size would be interesting too. my guess is something like that would be big

[@lonceyscairns33]

Lol, he thinks I'm Mr Beast, no I don't, I am 😂 Cheers much, Sigma's come along in leaps and bounds and I love your sunflare photo, not many people I've seen can do great sunflare photos like that, you must be like me and walk around noticing exactly where the sun is shining, at any given time of the day 😂😜🤔🤪❤

[@yawningmarmot]

I just wish they would release a Contemporary version that's considerably lighter. Still, with the new motors and stuff this could be a perfect lens for the S5IIX, especially since you get linear manual focus with Panasonic. Great outdoorsy video, Mr. Beast! :)

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

they actually do have the sigma 28-70 2.8 they released a couple of years ago that is excellent and much lighter and more affordable amzn.to/3KeMFjL

[@yawningmarmot]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis oh yes, I've being eyeing it for a while, but I feel like I'm really gonna miss that 24mm wide angle I'm so used to :)

[@ChaseJamison]

What do you think vs the Tamron 28-75 G2? That's even cheaper, (I think lighter?), and reaches further. If we pretend you didn't lose the 24-28 would it be the better choice as far as performance?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

That's an excellent lens and a great choice. The Sigma Art is optically a little better and - but you wouldn't notice in the majority of situations

[@SperS-222]

I have bad experience with Tamron 28-75

I got the sony a6300 but jump to the Lumix S5 (i) i hope this lens comes in L mount too. :) thanks for the info.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

yes, L-Mount available

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis ¡Siiii!

[@ToddDeSilva]

Definitely one of the things I didn’t research well enough when I switched to Sony from canon is the price of the lenses. Thank goodness was for these 3rd party lenses. 😂

[@iamakkkshay]

L-Mount for win

[@CameraCombo]

And made in Japan! Nice!

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

🤣

[@BarryJohnson]

I can't thank Sigma enough!!!!

[@josefloreslaw1049]

Dumb question but does this lens work with the Sony zv-e10?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

it absolutely does, but there are better choices for the zv-e10 because it’s apsc. getting the Sigma 18-50 would be a better choice for the zv-e10 in terms of size and price

[@josefloreslaw1049]

Which is better between the sigma 18-50 vs the tamron 17-70 or the tamron 28-200? Thanks.

[@whereisjohnnow]

would you recommend it for use on an Sony apsc camera?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

no, it’s a big big and expensive. You can get smaller glass for better prices for apsc like the Sigma 18-50

[@jasonbalenweddingfilm3749]

wish they make internal zooming 24-70s

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

I do love an internal zoom. it would be a lot longer though

[@limagepicture9023]

Sony must launch the new 24-70mm F2 to rule them all 😉👍

[@DjimmyTrovy]

Have you compared this new Sigma with the GM2?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Not head to head because I don’t have the GM2 with me - but I’ve used both

[@nicholasstevens2003]

Mr beast, what does it mean to be more “Linear”?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

When using the focus ring. the focus will be in the same spot when you turn the ring so you can work out your focus points and leave it. with non-linear, when you change the speed of the focus ring, the focus will end up in a different spot

[@MasoodJamal]

I need a lens for my sony ZVE-10 camera which is within my budget with excellent blur effect so that I can shoot real estate video I need your guidance

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

try the sigma 16mm 1.4 amzn.to/4dV7vTb

[@MasoodJamal]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I have used the sigma 16mm but it doesn't have much blur effect what I want please suggest another

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

blur will occur when you use a low fstop like f1.4. There are not very many wide lenses that can give you more blur than that. you can try a more narrow focal range like the sigma 30mm 1.4 - this will make the background look blurrier because of the focal length, but it will be less wode

[@MasoodJamal]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis What about the Tamron lense series ?

[@nat-lj8kt]

GM II has much less LOCA where it matters at 70mm. The Sigma has better flare resistance. In the end, it's sample variation lottery and centering that will decide

[@ChrisMitchells_FlyingCameras]

And we all want good bananas!! 🍌

[@bondgabebond4907]

To Mr. Beast: Dang, I already have the original one. Not worth it to slightly upgrade. Good to see Sigma up their game with excellent lenses. If only they would reverse the zooming direction of the wheel. I actually prefer the Sony 20-70mm f4 zoom. Very comfortable to use and I don't mind the f4 limitation. Any news about the ZV-E10 mk. 2? Is the rumor of an A6900 valid or just wishful thinking? For macro, I pull out my super excellent Sony 90mm f2.8 marvel of macro lens.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Haven't heard anything - not even the rumour mills seem to have anything at all these days

[@bondgabebond4907]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I feared it to be too good to be true.

[@DannyRampage]

Should I do the Sony 24-50, or this new sigma?!

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

that’s a tough call. the Sigma is much more versatile, but the Sony will be smaller and lighter. of you don’t need the 50-70 - then the Sony for sure.

[@JoATTech]

Is that pre release? Haven't seen any official info :o

[@JoATTech]

Ok, now I can see this lens all over the place, but yours video was first on my feed :D 🎆🎆🎆

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

nice!!

[@user-py4ig6hh5v]

I think you meant 17mm minimum distance instead of 17cm you've said ?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

17cm is the minimum focus distance. it’s measured from the sensor of the camera. not the lens 👍

[@steview88]

I want to save up for this lol

[@fashionops]

just buy the lens used in got mine for 1500$ expensive but later on if I want A1 Body I can easily use its full potential

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Certainly a viable option if a nice copy is available for a price like that 👍

[@soyboyman]

Literally JUST bought the Art V1 a month ago brand new, feeling robbed currently lol

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

I hate when that happens!! but, in the bright side, the original sigma art is still a great lens.

[@eek0212]

I still thinking sony is bit more reasonable than other competitors (N/C/P) but yeah this is the competing i wish they lower some prices to match up with those 3rd party companies. besides 2nd hand sigma price way way much going lower

[@BK-rh1lj]

Sony must lower prices ❎ Sony lower must prices ✅ 😂😂

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

haha - I debated how to write it.

[@riotamara]

why your files are DNG? can sony set raw files to dng?

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

They’re converted in Lightroom.

[@riotamara]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis oh i see, thanks mark

[@auroraflash]

I jsut bought the 2.8 Art in November :(

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

still a great lens - some improvements, but the original one is still great

[@auroraflash]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis same price though ^^

[@mamunoz23]

Thank you, MrBeast

[@TheNorang]

Sony will keep crippling features of 3rd party lenses on their newer body (no breathing compensation, limit to 15fps on burst shoot mode). But at least they're the only manufacturer that's opened their mount, besides L mount I think

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Nikon and Fuji are also allowing only 3rd party. Canon just let in a few sigma lenses so that’s a start. But Sony by far has the most available lenses

[@SamuelJamesVideos]

They needed to lower prices 10 years ago. The whole industry does. They manufacture these things by the thousands. There's no reason for these profit margins to be so high other than greed.

[@JoATTech]

😳😦😯😲

[@Jecerey]

non native lenses do bad with stabilisation, big selling point of the zv-e1 is the dynamic stab, having it not working properly is a big down grade.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

Dynamic active stab on the ZV-E1 actually does a great job with any lens - very smooth, but it's with the regular active stabilization yo will see a big difference in stabilization with 3rd party lenses. I have a video coming Wednesday to demonstrate

[@Jecerey]

I think you're wrong about this one kzbin.info/www/bejne/q3fEkGmcrcaCaaMsi=rJF3UbVL0XR_qihb

[@d.l.sstudio8922]

I just bought the sigma contemporary 28-70 last week. Contemplating returning it for this. The thing is I really like how light the 28-70 is. Edit: on a side note I don’t think this art lens is worth $500 US dollars more than the 28-70. The 28-70 is on sale for $700 and this art lens cost $1200 I think maybe for that $500 I’d rather get the Viltrox 16mm.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

that sigma is fantastic - no need to change unless you desperately need the 24mm

[@cjenkins79]

I’ve seen test videos where the sigma is better at focus breathing

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

I tested the focus breathing in the video - it’s great

[@limagepicture9023]

Sorry, but I suffered a lot of issues with the previous model from Sigma so now I will expect the Returns in a couple of month by non KZbinrs .🤔

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

why, what happened to your lens? I’ve never had an issue with any of my sigmas. KZbinrs aren’t given Sigma lenses. We have to buy them full price like everyone else. Same with most companies: Sigma, Tamron, Sony, Canon. Nikon - they only provide loans for 2 weeks

[@jfphotography69]

Sony, Nikon "is what I shoot" and Canon, sorry to say, but they overcharge for their glass. Especially Nikon and Canon with their new Z and RF mounts.

[@kevinshah1959]

MrBeast

[@Sanket.vjadhav]

What if they just start making 3rd party lens a bit worse 🌚. Just shhh!! and dont say anything to sony they are doing excellent 👍🏼

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

🤣

[@jonathanalfred9847]

Sony needs to stop the cripling of 3rd party glass. Its starting to piss me off. And i hope its starting to piss off other people. Because Sony wont change unless they get pushed to do so. Maybe now that Nikon is starting to get 3rd party glass. And they arent restricting them. Sony might be forced to follow. The new Nikon mount Viltrox 16 f1.8 shoots at 30fps on the Nikon Z9. And only 15fps on the Sony A1. And Sony needs to stop restricting focus breathing compensation. Its just time for Sony to fully open up the 3rd party glass.

[@Iorndealer]

Certainly great value for money and a great performer but it’s not the absolute best and as outstanding as the GM ii. It don’t beat out the Sony and if economics are not the issue stay with the Sony as I will.

[@brugj03]

The Sony GM seems like not an artistic dream lens. As far as i can see the good old terrible hard blue hue and super flat rendering of this SIgma, makes the Sony look like an artistic dream. It seems you do get what you pay for.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

You have to get what’s right for you for sure

[@user-tm4yc8gx2k]

Lotus sells a mid engine sportscar for 99k, Ferrari needs to cut their prices by %70... People are willing to pay for quality, and sigma glass shoots and renders like ass.

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

this lens in indistinguishable in image quality to the GMII. Do some side-by-sides for yourself and you’ll see.

[@amazonfinds9157]

Respectfully nobody cares we know it’s good the rest is not needed

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

a review saying an $1200 and saying it’s good is not enough. People trying to make a purchase decision like this want to know how it performs in all areas - most lenses are good. It’s the rest that is the important. You might not care, but most do.

[@Wahyuvisual]

SONY: You think we even care, no God D4mn it🥱

[@MarkBennettCameraCrisis]

🤣They definitely don’t care why I have to say

[@Wahyuvisual]

@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis EVERYBODY GANGSTA, UNTIL SONY CLOSE THEIR MOUNT LIKE CANON RF DOES