Hey guys! How many riddles did you get right? And if you love murder riddles, click here kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXvGYmOuqa97ncU
@isobahall28006 жыл бұрын
i solved 4 riddles :D
@united2706 жыл бұрын
BRIGHT SIDE hii
@united2706 жыл бұрын
BRIGHT SIDE none
@yeetus_deletus34896 жыл бұрын
BRIGHT SIDE I got 4 riddles right
@projecttsukinome54316 жыл бұрын
BRIGHT SIDE 3
@carni36656 жыл бұрын
For the second riddle, I have to argue that the answer was rather illogical. There could have been someone in 'his' room that would have opened the door for him. It was the fact that he said 'Wrong room' and went for the direction of the elevators instead of his room, which raised my suspicion. Anyone else agree?
@BreakingTheLore6 жыл бұрын
SharpTech Gaming That's what I thought too
@soIatido6 жыл бұрын
never thought of that
@gianmarcocervati81396 жыл бұрын
It makes more sense that people who get to the wrong room do that because they have gone to the corrispondent room of another floor rather than to another room of the same floor as their, if you understand what I mean.
@theincrediblethinker63716 жыл бұрын
For me, what was suspicious was that if he thought it was his room. Why did he knock or not try to use his key?
@carni36656 жыл бұрын
Maybe he thought there would be someone to open it for him. (e.g. Wife, children, friends)
@BL4CK5M1TH6 жыл бұрын
It's not fair to have a riddle that leaves out important information. Like the guy with the gunshot wound in his car. If you leave out the information about what kind of car it is, the only way you can get that question right is if you simply guess. But when a riddle is designed to make someone guess it becomes unfair as there are too many possibilities. Also, My guess was that he was shot, but survived, got in his car and then bled out after locking himself inside, attempting to get further away. Which is just as good a possibility as the car being a convertible. Both answers are completely plausible, therefore no detective could possibly conclude that there is not entry point in the car because the roof was down, as there are many other possibilities, which again, makes this riddle unfair. Same with the riddle of the fly in the coffee, how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup that she recognized, or maybe the fly was still in it, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup. When riddles intentionally leave out information that is key to the answer, it makes the riddle unfair and in my opinion, is no longer a riddle worthy of deduction. If you read this I thank you, even if this comment gets no replies I hope someone reads it because these so called "riddles" really annoy me.
@smoothcriminal07076 жыл бұрын
BL4CK5M1TH 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@alexowen89846 жыл бұрын
You didnt have to make the comment that long.
@BL4CK5M1TH6 жыл бұрын
Im glad you guys read my comment, yes I understand I could have made it shorter, the reason it's long is honestly because this was a little frustrating and I wanted to be specific so that anyone who did read it would understand exactly what im trying to say.
@NotTylerT6 жыл бұрын
BL4CK5M1TH agreed
@lsimhbiwfefmtalolw6 жыл бұрын
but they added a cartoon drawing of a convertible
@woodycoda47725 жыл бұрын
What if the man jumped from the roof and not the window
@elisepiir57275 жыл бұрын
true, true but did you see that there actually was no windows in the picture? like what?
@zesphirousnetwork36815 жыл бұрын
True , also i assume that he would plunge head-first on to his death so most-likely he would be face down with his skull cracķed & not on his back ( he would have to be facing the person who shoved him off in order to land the way he did ) also this theory is only relevant if you base the riddle off of the sketch itself , i say this because one can't really notice if the windows are in fact open or closed !
@user-kl3rw1vt5r5 жыл бұрын
How would he get onto the roof?
@drasticgamerstv10255 жыл бұрын
@@user-kl3rw1vt5r just like how he wouldve gotten on to any floor...using the stairs
@Thechickenmafia5 жыл бұрын
BOOOM BOOLM BOOM!!
@shaxxmeer5 жыл бұрын
Bright Side:"OnlY tHe mOSt AtTenTiVE peOlPe caN SolVe tHem!" Me: Watches 5 different riddle videoes, all sharing the same riddle WAIT A MINUTE
@BullyMaguire20243 жыл бұрын
I don’t understand fly in coffee. My answer for the riddle is that SHE LITERALLY SAW THE FLY AGAIN! He never said anything about there being sugar.
@BullyMaguire20243 жыл бұрын
I also noticed Peter Griffin in the court room at riddle number 4! 😂 Lol
@codeblue17783 жыл бұрын
Yeah and some of them were in movies 😂
@tanyitmengunofficial93813 жыл бұрын
@@BullyMaguire2024 that true!
@BullyMaguire20243 жыл бұрын
@@tanyitmengunofficial9381 I know right
@jlhedits37856 жыл бұрын
wait but the riddle with the guy that was accused of killing his wife.... it was stated that " *everybody* in the room, turned and looked at the door" leaving me under the impression that every single person in the room was facing the door but the answer contradicted the riddle itself idk if I should be angry or what
@raducora71596 жыл бұрын
But then it says that the lawyer and the defendant were looking at them(jury and judge), not at the door.
@Killerspiderpig6 жыл бұрын
Radu Cora - But if the judge/jury were looking at the door, how would they know the lawyer and defendant weren't?
@gremlinn76 жыл бұрын
Another problem with this riddle is "almost immediately after that, the jury comes up with a guilty verdict". This isn't how verdicts work - jurors come up with their verdicts after *all* courtroom proceedings have ended, and they don't do so in the courtroom but in a separate deliberation room.
@emptycradle13046 жыл бұрын
Ah ha!! the lawyer was his accomplice since he wasn't looking at the door either...
@MasonIshida6 жыл бұрын
I though it was because his wife didn’t enter the room, meaning the lawyer had lied.
@EthalaRide6 жыл бұрын
6:47 My mom tought me that if there's something nasty in your food, like a hair or bug or something, put a LOT of salt on it before sending it back. If you get your food back and it's salty, then you know they gave you the same food.
@uvk4186 жыл бұрын
So either ways, your still putting it in your mouth cause you need to taste it right
@EthalaRide6 жыл бұрын
what else would you do with food you ordered?
@harrisonmc70086 жыл бұрын
Genius
@jasminenatasya86 жыл бұрын
EthalaRide thank you for the life hack!
@gunmnky6 жыл бұрын
Or it's salty because the cook ejaculated in it. Enjoy slurping that to see if it's salty or not. I never send food back. I eat it or leave.
@calebcpark5 жыл бұрын
They don’t give enough information in most of them. And how would we know the lady put sugar in it?
@karnewsletters33285 жыл бұрын
That is the fastest I got. That's the point of a riddle . They told you she noticed it was the same, so you deduct : how she noticed.
@SevenTears0075 жыл бұрын
Yes, because if you drink your coffee sweetened, you will definitely taste it before adding sugar.
@jomuffins65515 жыл бұрын
Did you not see the sugar?
@LeAvEb00g5 жыл бұрын
that is the purpose of this video mate..
@AfroJeffrey5 жыл бұрын
I thought the coffee was still the same due to the temperature.
@HackingIsDope4 жыл бұрын
The answer of the second one can also be that since he went to the elevator, he couldn't have had his room on the same floor, and therefore couldn't have mistaken it for his room
@Tawnyaise03 жыл бұрын
I think the woman was judgmental. BECAUSE, it's not necessary that there is only one person living in each room, there are STRONG possiblies that he was sharing his room with his family members or friends. And he can't take away the keys because it will give other roommates a tough time, if they want to go out, they can't go only because the man took the keys and he can't leave keeping the door open. Hence he did not take the keys and had to knock
@Tawnyaise03 жыл бұрын
Don't you think this is more logical?
@HackingIsDope3 жыл бұрын
@@Tawnyaise0 yeah man I think the riddle was wrong
@mw002953 жыл бұрын
yeah this is a far better answer
@neilayprabhu56213 жыл бұрын
@@mw00295 ikr
@alexknott40066 жыл бұрын
*All flaws in the riddles:* 9. Hotel Room: - the woman could have been suspicious because the man left towards the elevators. - it is plausible that the man knocked because he was staying with someone and didn't have a key. I've knocked on my own hotel room door many times. 7. Ice Tea: - the animations do not match up as there are no ice cubes depicted in the ice tea. So here we have to assume that the women have ice in their drink. 6. Mysterious death in the car: - again, we have to assume information about the type of car, which does not make it a riddle. - the man also could have been shot, then locked himself in his car before bleeding out. 5. Fly in coffee: - how are we to know that she put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to guess? Because if we are supposed to assume that she likes sugar in her coffee, then that means we can also assume/guess other things like maybe there was a specific stain on the cup or lipstick on it that she recognized, or maybe she simply saw him bring back the same cup. 4, In court for killing the wife: - this is by far the stupidest riddle... the riddle states "Everybody in the room, including the judge and jury, turns and looks at the door." This should include the man who killed his wife. 3. A case of a smuggler: - how are we to assume that he doesn't smuggle clothes, or hats, or shoes into the country as he would be wearing them as well. - plus, "smuggle" is not the correct word to use here. By definition, smuggling is the act of "moving (goods) illegally into or out of a country." It is not illegal to bring bikes in and out of countries, even if those bikes are stolen. This is a very misleading use of the word smuggle. All the others are fine (although a little misleading). Thanks for reading XD
@surefirewin6 жыл бұрын
I agree with you on all of these except the court killer one. It specifically states that everyone looks at the door, while the defendant and his attorney stared at the jury to see there response. It made it clear that the killer was not looking at the door.
@alexknott40066 жыл бұрын
True, but also just because he doesn't look at a door should not mean he is guilty... people would be looking for more substantial evidence than that.
@ryantitn6 жыл бұрын
This is all so accurate and true
@amedeenicoleaguirre41716 жыл бұрын
About the Ice tea, of course ice teas have ice, I mean who would enjoy ice tea without ice
@alexknott40066 жыл бұрын
True haha
@careforicebear9236 жыл бұрын
I have a question about the fly in coffee riddle. How are we supposed to know that she put the sugar on the table in the coffee?!?!
@cupcakesbiggestfan79546 жыл бұрын
careforicebear because it tasted sweet in the end.
@NZBigC_PSPlusPlatinums6 жыл бұрын
He is asking how we are supposed to know that she put it in the coffee before knowing the riddle. The answer is you do not know, and that riddle was not a good one. It would have been better if it said 'Just as she put in a spoonful of sugar, she noticed a fly... or something along those lines.
@subblonde31016 жыл бұрын
there were a lot like that....some had more than 1 answer also 'ice tea' doesn't have to have ice in it....its just the name of the drink like coke or pepsi...
@GoochCouga6 жыл бұрын
Sometimes you have to think outside the box instead of thinking logically, and they specifically make the logical answer wrong and make the real answer stupidly obvious. I am not a fan of those kinds of riddles myself :p
@nickelcobalt986 жыл бұрын
tbh for that one i guessed that it would not have been as warm as freshly brewed coffee because she’d had it out for a while and that’s how she knew because honestly how tf are we supposed to know she likes sugar in her coffee
@laurenbray86296 жыл бұрын
There’s not enough detail, especially the fly in the coffee, you should’ve said that she had previously put sugar in her coffee.
@wbwam77106 жыл бұрын
ikr, it could have been cold, heck, it could've still had the fly in it!
@theosvideoessays49896 жыл бұрын
I seen the sugar on the table, which made me guess it would of been to sweet if she put more sugar in the same coffee.
@Swnsasy6 жыл бұрын
Lauren Bray I said the same thing.. Im like how did we know the windows had to be opened for him to throw out the cigarettes, how did we know it was a convertible.. Yea, just not enough information..
@Ludamantle6 жыл бұрын
It says he opened the window and threw the cigarette out the window, went to the next floors and repeated the action. I agree about some of these being worded poorly. They are riddles, they're not going to spell it out for you. You need to read the words carefully and think outside the box. But these seem to have more than one logical solution. Dumb
@Ludamantle6 жыл бұрын
But yea, the convertible one was terrible.
@raejuniper5375 жыл бұрын
are you trying to tell me those ice cubes didn’t melt the slightest bit when she had 5 iced teas, also who drinks 5 iced teas???
@helloiexist33335 жыл бұрын
Me
@fukumean775 жыл бұрын
So true while she was drinking her third cup the fifth and fourth cup the ice should have melted
@helloiexist33335 жыл бұрын
@@fukumean77 but why would u order 5 teas at a time
@kanesyou50964 жыл бұрын
@@helloiexist3333 You got me there.
@JJose-224 жыл бұрын
She dint order all of them together she ordered one by one while waiting for the other one to finish
@emkarss56986 жыл бұрын
Some ridlles really have no logic.
@icouldntthinkofaname67186 жыл бұрын
Is it the ice cubes
@rottis50426 жыл бұрын
that first one
@sunilkulkarni56506 жыл бұрын
I solved 6
@brad52046 жыл бұрын
Yeah smuggling bycicles is ludicrous as they can be transported legally. By this logic, he could have also been "smuggling" sand or bags.
@cleventinetheclementine1956 жыл бұрын
by some you mean pretty much all of them
@icanthandlehobisboogieboot50776 жыл бұрын
I didn't solve many. But I'm playing the: *English isn't my first language and I couldn't understand everything.* - Card
@jaffedlopez-diaz33546 жыл бұрын
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp this actually really is an excuse for the first one :D
@twokingmick6 жыл бұрын
English isn't the first language of whoever wrote these either. It is probably the first language of the actor reading it, though.
@adrianad.99616 жыл бұрын
Nice username
@dumbshit44956 жыл бұрын
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp i love you username XD
@예리-d9g6 жыл бұрын
Ican'tHandleHobisBoogieBootyAnymoreSendHelp, You have a very creative username.
@hazerd25446 жыл бұрын
Half of these are missing the necessary information. How are we supposed to know the lady put sugar in her coffee? Are we supposed to assume the cops said literally "Your wife is murdered, you need to meet us at the crime scene" without telling the guy where it was? Etc. Etc. Granted, these are good brain teasers, but presenting it in the form of "Are you smart enough to solve the riddle?" Then giving us missing information so it's impossible to get some right, then questioning "How many did you get right?" sounds like you want people to feel like idiots.
@Killerspiderpig6 жыл бұрын
That's why he joked at the start of the video about this being good for your brain - the riddles are meant to be taken with a grain of salt.
@sarah-rr2lb6 жыл бұрын
Hazerd ikr!!!!
@ejicey97056 жыл бұрын
Hazerd f
@ejicey97056 жыл бұрын
Hazerd you dont need to assume,they told you what the police said
@guyf91196 жыл бұрын
Ej Icey they told you what the police told the guy. They did not put the line in quotes, which means it wasn’t exactly what they said, meaning we don’t know whether or not they actually mentioned where the crime scene was or not
@josephjeon8043 жыл бұрын
I would sue the police if detectives actually solved cases like this
@jeroenpro1499 Жыл бұрын
nice
@yashwanthdivate1883 Жыл бұрын
Hahaha you are 100% correct
@yashwanthdivate1883 Жыл бұрын
@@jeroenpro1499 how many riddles did you solved
@jeroenpro1499 Жыл бұрын
@@yashwanthdivate1883 like 3 or so i think
@Insimpleterms17 Жыл бұрын
😄
@shanedeleon53765 жыл бұрын
Okay but you have to TELL US she put sugar in the coffee beforehand in order for it to be a fair riddle. We can't just assume that.
@jennia97845 жыл бұрын
Right!!!!
@antoinettebush15745 жыл бұрын
Seems to me that she would have noticed the fly as she was putting the sugar in the coffee. So that means the fly came after she put the sugar in the coffee. Also the new cup of coffee should have been hot to the touch. But i do like the riddles. And the 2 ladies that were drinking the iced tea that was a true story. That shouldn't have been a riddle.
@danielgarciadeoliveira2405 жыл бұрын
the answers for those riddles arent definite, it could be anything. she could have seen the waiter or whatever
@georgehs61115 жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@bakasta15875 жыл бұрын
you must had notice the sugar cubes right next to the pancakes
@applehead21346 жыл бұрын
firstly, quit using misleading graphics. secondly, there's a difference between a riddle, and being bad at communication.
@Packerfan1306 жыл бұрын
There's also a difference between being tricked by the riddle and riddle having a flaw in it.
@nG272276 жыл бұрын
Xkcd comes to mind. Indeed, the questions posed by these riddles seem to have multiple potential explanations, and claiming only one of them is valid makes for a very bad riddle for several reasons.
@chrismanthebest34936 жыл бұрын
Very true because in number 8 it clearly showed no windows on any of the floors and in the end it was clear that all the windows have been closed even though the showed building given to us has no windows-_-
@chrismanthebest34936 жыл бұрын
Really ten, nine, and seven had to be “don’t look the picture it doesn’t show resemblance to the riddle”
@turquoisewolf58476 жыл бұрын
Yea
@knowberries21395 жыл бұрын
*Who else thinks that the questions are not well explained ????*
@EricaStrunk765 жыл бұрын
Know Berries I do
@ArsenaL_YT5 жыл бұрын
It is explained as riddles only u use your brain
@devilishhdj18715 жыл бұрын
These riddles are designed to catch you out with vague details... there is no way to solve them.
@gelop-wo7iu5 жыл бұрын
@@ArsenaL_YT i used my brain. For example number ten she was stabbed in the car. So im like alright so theres going to be blood in the car. But nope im wrong because they figure out a harder way
@kaonahajrushi67745 жыл бұрын
I do
@scriptedjava92654 жыл бұрын
Real detectives on a case take weeks, months, or even YEARS to solve a case. Despite the easiness of these, there’s no real comparison. 15 seconds? Really?
@0furious03 жыл бұрын
yeah ur right
@johnwright19623 жыл бұрын
It’s not really forensics really it’s kinda a riddle
@strsjk5 жыл бұрын
ok but if the roof was open when he was shot, how did it close after?
@sweetchocolate71135 жыл бұрын
Wow your a smart kid I didn't even think of that respect seriously how did it close by itself
@bangpink27714 жыл бұрын
army!!
@saimonturtle98354 жыл бұрын
the killer closed it
@HellishCube3 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@enricopalmaresjr.35463 жыл бұрын
i closed it
@anirudhbhalekar6 жыл бұрын
most of the riddles contained information that hadn't been discloses to us, so it is unfair to say that we must have 'assumed' that the situation was like it was e.g., the ice in the ice tea, the convertible car, the sugar
@hebaalshehmany65526 жыл бұрын
the car in the picture was a convertible. But it's true that that was unfair. I assumed the window was down then someone came and pulled it up again.
@ianjonas6 жыл бұрын
yea, the sugar was so shady. my answer was possibly a small smudge of her lipstick on the cup.
@royrob2476 жыл бұрын
The ice tea one I got right only because of the picture but the convertible i didn’t pay attention to that well but the sugar one definitely mislead
@centimanj89166 жыл бұрын
The first one threw me for a loop, because i was expecting a Detective riddle, not an Dumb Wordplay that happenes to feature an Detective.
@publicdefense95896 жыл бұрын
The picture of her lips indicated no lipstick, but there was a bowl of sugar on the table. What may be difficult is that some riddles are solved by the picture, others by the stated information. The first one was the most clever IMO. Poison in the ice cubes the most difficult.
@naterk94606 жыл бұрын
LIES! Information: "Everybody in the room, including the judge and the jury, turns and looks at the door..." Answer: "The man who had been accused wasn't looking at the door." You LITERALLY said that EVERYBODY was looking at the door. You didn't say only the jury and the judge, you said INCLUDING.
@rainsuarez36306 жыл бұрын
Nater K it said that the lawyer and the defendant looked at the other people and that’s when the lawyer said that they had reasonable doubt that the wife was dead. BOOM
@camcorder82036 жыл бұрын
Nater K for real and if the car roof was down when he shot him who put it up after he died
@byronsay54426 жыл бұрын
Nater K
@KakaOfTheRealMadrid6 жыл бұрын
exactly it would make more sense if someone shot him and placed him there... and also if they got a clear shot (when car was roofless) why would he not have any gunpowder residue on his body
@CR-zd6nx6 жыл бұрын
Why would a man even be on trial for killing his wife without a corpse to prove that she was dead? Why would anyone look at the door in the courtroom if that corpse existed?
@unrested72943 жыл бұрын
i remember bingewatching detective mystery solving videos when i was 10 and this channel is one of those. now i'm a few years away from studying psychology at a university with a vast understanding of human behaviour considering that i'm only 16. coming back to these types of videos really brought back memories and nostalgia.
@charliecockayne95682 жыл бұрын
Well done!!!
@omage4209 Жыл бұрын
Dude psych is awesome
@vanshika29125 жыл бұрын
Video : *What does he smuggle?* Me : *He smuggles sand.* Edit 1 : *OMG! 870 likes! Thanks guys.. love ya :D*
@enigmaticz12185 жыл бұрын
Same.
@joelgreene33505 жыл бұрын
same
@pradyutdas43325 жыл бұрын
Maybe he is smuggle gold... because gold is same as sand.... 😇😇😇
@galacticempire46915 жыл бұрын
Lol because of sand
@aleriamsoma57925 жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard at this
@unkownelectronicmusic95396 жыл бұрын
This title is extremely inaccurate attentive means good listener pay attention to important and details store information to keep in mind and remember when looking for your final answer most of these answers require assumptions that dont relate to how good you were listening
@gavin27846 жыл бұрын
Unkown ElectronicMusic yeah like the sugar one. It never says she puts sugar in it so you just have to assume
@AJ_._._6 жыл бұрын
GavinT1101 Even the one In court for killing the wife. He said everyone looked at the door, but at the end he said the husband didn't look at the door. So you just have to assume he didn't.
@godsky41056 жыл бұрын
Unkown ElectronicMusic I
@stamis226 жыл бұрын
The problem with bright side is that their “riddles” always have multiple possible answers and they stump you from solving the puzzles by omitting important information, information that would be clear had you been part of the actual situation, but not all omitted information is actually important so you more or less have to guess as to what they left out and if it is or is not going to lead you to the answer
@EternalEmpr3ss6 жыл бұрын
Bright side does really misleading tests lets be real
@doodlebird94706 жыл бұрын
like the fly in coffee they didn't say she put sweetener
@josephpotter46856 жыл бұрын
I agree the solid ones could win you a drink at a bar the sketchy ones could get you beat up
@Alex-oj6zx6 жыл бұрын
I agree, last test stated the husband had been informed his wife was dead and had to come to the crime scene. ANYONE could assume that the police told him where his wife died ESPECIALLY since he was given information about her!
@aivreescend79456 жыл бұрын
Alex Tucker no the right thing to do is to NOT invite the husband into the crime scene because the closest relative will always be the first suspect. It was a clear trap. You didn't want your suspect to came into the crime scene and tarnish it right? For victim confirmation it usually happens in the morgue because a dead human can wait. It's just wordplay. In this tests you simply need to find irregularities. But some i agree, like that coffee case is straight up dishonest as for keeping an important detail hidden simply to make it seems harder or more random.
@choudharysahabmusic35135 жыл бұрын
Case 6: The man might had been shot first and then he tried to escape and get into the car but died of bleeding.
@icaroexe4 жыл бұрын
Maybe his window was open and someone shot him while driving by
@jennypalma70384 жыл бұрын
CHOUDHARY_SAHAB then there should be blood on where he was shot to his car
@proxy.67894 жыл бұрын
I thought the same but his answer was different
@almostmonk55234 жыл бұрын
No man can do this after getting shooted at head
@americanoperator31474 жыл бұрын
Yukizuchi If the window was open, why did the description of the scene say that the doors were locked and the windows were closed?
@paulbeardsley40955 жыл бұрын
Not that I've ever killed anyone, nor intend to, but I think if I had killed someone, and I was told they were about to walk into the room, I would be as curious as heck as to who was going to come in!
@alexapadackles1185 жыл бұрын
Basically,the one with the wife is wrong,since we were told EVERYONE in the room turned to look at the door
@Devilupz4 жыл бұрын
BASICALLY, the lawyer knows that his client is the murderer and they planned the whole 'wife is gonna enter' story to make the judge bail him out... so the murderer wasn't curious as he knew no one would show up
@ultra-flamaxus4 жыл бұрын
*BASICALLY* the husband was actually wife with plastic surgery after killing the husband So she was looking at herself
@IOEUIE4 жыл бұрын
Not only that, but in such a case wouldn't the man also know about the plan of the lawyer? Besides the lawyer didn't look at the door as well
@jakerockznoodles3 жыл бұрын
@@alexapadackles118 Maybe someone at the door had a big mirror. Thought of that, huh?
@Populous3Tutorials6 жыл бұрын
the smuggler one is terrible, he could even smuggle sand bags, or mexican hats, there was no evidence he had a new bike everytime
@KennuhWayne6 жыл бұрын
Populous3 Tutorials I know. I assumed he was using the same bike. There was nothing to indicate otherwise. I figured he was smuggling the sandbags too.
@amandaburns32346 жыл бұрын
That’s the entire point of these riddles. Your brain naturally wants to assume and fill in the holes of the story with what you deem the most logical. And that’s why people don’t get them right. I got all of these right and I did that by reading the facts given and watching closely to see what my brain would automatically assume without any facts. That’s how I figured out the answers. For example with the smuggling one, I read “...crosses the Mexican border on his bicycle everyday” and I pictured the man crossing the border over and over on the same red bicycle and then I quickly realized that it didn’t say “his bicycle” but rather “a bicycle” and my brain had just automatically assumed he was riding the same bike everyday. That’s when I guessed he was smuggling different bikes in or (because who tf smuggles bikes) he was smuggling the tires of a bike or some important part of a bike.
@KennuhWayne6 жыл бұрын
Amanda Burns I don't believe you got all of them right. Not at all.
@Aethiral6 жыл бұрын
Ken Martin I believe her due to the fact that I myself got almost all of them right just a few like the one with the windows and the guy who jumped out. I assumed it was something to do with the cigarette. So I wouldn’t be surprised if she got all of them right.
@KennuhWayne6 жыл бұрын
XtremeGaming Yeah, I can see a person getting most of them right, but not all. Especially the one with the "convertible" car that really didn't even make sense. I just don't believe that anyone got all of them right. I'm not buying it.
@ziadus61546 жыл бұрын
not enough detail. You need to be more specific or we cant figure out the riddles.
@brycecravens97066 жыл бұрын
Ziadus that's why it's called a riddle
@Pennywise4676 жыл бұрын
it doesn't make sense
@EpicN1ck6 жыл бұрын
Bryce Cravens i would not call these a riddle. Riddles are usually complex but have a logical solution contained within the riddle itself. Questions here are vague and do not give you any logical solution within the text. For example, Riddles are like figuring out that two plus two is four. Whereas these questions give you the number four, then you have to play a guessing game if the rest was either two times two or one times four.
@miloislame6 жыл бұрын
With certain ones, there were things that could be assumed if other ways of solving it or just not enough to have a conclusion
@ziadus61546 жыл бұрын
no...for example the tea one never mentioned the sugar....they could have just said "the lady then put some sugar in her drink and drank blah blah blah but then saw a fly"
@janoschkovasiipi345 жыл бұрын
I tought he was smuggling him self😂🤦🏿♂️
@vineet62335 жыл бұрын
😂
@jennypalma70384 жыл бұрын
I got this right
@danielkorn17534 жыл бұрын
i thought he was smuggling sand
@ingechrisdiyanto66094 жыл бұрын
Yeah me too. I missed this one.
@samarapretto55964 жыл бұрын
That is a whole new level 😂
@PonzWasTaken6 жыл бұрын
you miss out really important details. Like you didn't say the coffee had sugar in it, and didn't say the car was a convertable.
@lucieplaysstuff9826 жыл бұрын
Ponz it’s not supposed to
@johnnyhell12156 жыл бұрын
Leaving out important details is part of it lol
@AwesomeDude17386 жыл бұрын
Vex_ Hunter thats how I figured it out
@vexling1116 жыл бұрын
or for example, who the heck closed the roof?
@riftvallance20876 жыл бұрын
Or he could have been shot outside of the car then placed inside
@is59416 жыл бұрын
another answer for the last cassette riddle is that if a person killed themselves, they wouldn't be able to stop the recording because they are dead
@h.z68706 жыл бұрын
Isabel Song yes that's exactly what I was thinking!!
@AbuOsama296 жыл бұрын
Tape recordings stop automatically when they run out of tape.
@neotheboxer60156 жыл бұрын
That is also what I thought
@AbuOsama296 жыл бұрын
The gun shot sound was heard in the recording
@kaziiqbal72576 жыл бұрын
Also, the gun would be on the floor, basic forensics.
@WorkingHat5 жыл бұрын
If he was smuggling bicycles, how was he coming back to his country? On foot, or smuggling the same looking bicycle back where he came from?
@RickyMahabir5 жыл бұрын
He rode across everyday with an old bicycle and rode back later with a new one.
@rafiyyaaa74825 жыл бұрын
That doesn't make sense
@winifredtetteh99505 жыл бұрын
Rafał Figiel
@TheMongolat4 жыл бұрын
He smuggled Sneakers back to the US 😳
@ishaanverma654 жыл бұрын
Shoes, clothes ,caps,gold in tyres
@amkeamke50605 жыл бұрын
7:12 bruh you said everybody in the room
@BullyMaguire20243 жыл бұрын
I know. I don’t get it. He literally said my wife will come in the room but he knew she wouldn’t. Why on earth would he say that? If he knew she wouldn’t come he should have also known he would die for lying.
@6235river6 жыл бұрын
Intentionally leaving key information out does not a riddle make.
@MaeriberiiUsami6 жыл бұрын
Owning the same nail polish does not a murderer make?
@square93336 жыл бұрын
6235river I didn't get any right because the miracle never happen
@megaaziib5 жыл бұрын
this is like more a funny pop quiz than a riddle
@SoraShiroLLelouch5 жыл бұрын
Y did the lady put sugar even if it contained fly :p
@suryaraj0865 жыл бұрын
that's right....who knows?
@devuniquedev15 жыл бұрын
Nope.. may be to trap the waiter as she knew he would just remove the fly and bring back same cup
@wyatt7785 жыл бұрын
The most likely guess is that she put sugar before she noticed the fly.
@jawz665 жыл бұрын
The fly was on the bottom of the sugar cube? Back of the spoon? Who knows, bad riddle regardless.
@srikardvnss45665 жыл бұрын
Lokesh Agrawal she might be drinking black coffee...after mixing suger the fly might have surfaced and she noticed
@Explore-Gobal5 жыл бұрын
Not good - could have multiple answers
@jeonjimin74174 жыл бұрын
Yeah but like in any other cases you can make story out of it but only have one truth
@roopeshkumar23355 жыл бұрын
Got 7 of them right but still some of them were absurd and not clearly stated and could possibly have different sensible explainions.
@TheCleaner763 жыл бұрын
Nice work I got 6
@chileheadcraig6 жыл бұрын
how did the guy in the car close the convertible top after being shot?
@paigemink82496 жыл бұрын
The murderer closed the top probably
@chileheadcraig6 жыл бұрын
Lily Armstrong he could have just as easily closed the car door. The riddle was irrelevant 🤔
@axa9719976 жыл бұрын
was thinking the same thing before I see your comment
@a_chaotic_mind6 жыл бұрын
I Too Had This Question.
@thick-window93196 жыл бұрын
Magic
@jaysonwillard12006 жыл бұрын
Some of them aren't fair, the details of the riddle should be in the text, if otherwise, it is only pure speculation, like if there is sugar on a table, that doesn't mean you used it, or the fact that it didn't say she took a drink either.
@joshbowers7486 жыл бұрын
an angry shadow 2 I was thinking the same thing it never specified that it had sugar in the coffee
@obviouslyanonymous6 жыл бұрын
Josh Bowers same thing with the convertable.
@lilmisssunshine71736 жыл бұрын
Exactly. For the coffee riddle I guessed that she knew because the coffee wasn't freshly hot or it was lukewarm. For the car riddle I guessed that the man was shot somewhere else from long range and the murderer dragged his body into the car, then used the car keys to lock everything from the outside (but I guess that wouldn't make sense, since if the murderer had dragged him he probably would've rubbed gunpowder off onto the man's clothes, not to mention the bloodstains).
@falennon256 жыл бұрын
Agreed, I watched this since I have a degree in forensics and criminology, most of the riddles are not designed to be solved or have holes in logic. 10: just a riddle 9: is logical 8: "Man is said to jump out window" how do you know this if there were no witnesses to see and all windows were closed, also why could he have jumped off the roof? 7: never mentions key component of riddle 6: would not be hard to tell if you saw the scene and the key factor to quell the confusion was left out 5: again never mentions key component of riddle 4: how did the jury know that the defendant did not look at the door if they were all looking at the door and not him? Also, how are we supposed to know that the defendant did not look at the door. Also, he is still innocent until proven quilt so we cant make the assumption that he had killed her and therefore did not look for her. 3: how does he get back without his bicycle on a daily bases, and at some point they would notice that he always comes back without the bicycle and most likely travels with different bicycles. 2: who said that the police did not hit the rewind button before the play button? 1: good logic trick Only 3 of the questions are fair.
@jaysonwillard12006 жыл бұрын
On an unrelated note, this comment got way too many likes.
@HipsterBot20006 жыл бұрын
Zero.. i guess thats why i work at walmart
@austinlatshaw10496 жыл бұрын
HipsterBot my brother works at dollar general also known as DG
@eiichimilkshake85476 жыл бұрын
HipsterBot the second one was easy, cause if you think about it, People would just walk in, if it was locked they would unlock it.
@eiichimilkshake85476 жыл бұрын
but thats just me..
@HipsterBot20006 жыл бұрын
Marian Marionette .. im sure if my attention was better (i was playing pubg) i might have figured a couple. I did the same thing with the other videos lol
@eiichimilkshake85476 жыл бұрын
HipsterBot meh. Like i said, its just me. :p
@subsbyaweekchallenge4 жыл бұрын
Who else noticed the incorrect order of the numbering?? 👇
@bobsponge60626 жыл бұрын
Could’ve told us it was a convertible...
@cecekim76096 жыл бұрын
It had a pic of a convertable
@GoalzGoneWild6 жыл бұрын
if we're going by the picture then we have to ask the question, how is the roof now up if he got shot when the roof was down?
@reugenmccahan60416 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't have closed after being shot
@skyshooter666 жыл бұрын
galaxy girl gaming I've never seen a covertable. I would not have know that was a convertablw
@afg-hassan61696 жыл бұрын
GoalzGoneWild thats what I was thinking
@willcooper20206 жыл бұрын
Yh no offence but some of the answers were dodge af and there could’ve been a bunch of reasons
@farisferris20586 жыл бұрын
But then again it’s like a real investigation where you barely get any information
@jaysonsk6 жыл бұрын
Faris Maniar which just makes it worse that they expect us to suspect something without the evidence. If the detective got the information we got he would be unable to make an arrest as he would just be guessing and assuming extra things
@farisferris20586 жыл бұрын
Jayson that is true as most of them lack crucial information
@stormblade40216 жыл бұрын
The coffee one didn't tell us there was already sugar in the coffee, I thought it was cos the fly was still there
@dragon537776 жыл бұрын
Faris - no it's not. If you wanna see how real investigations go watch First 48. That is real as it gets.
@kiahood6 жыл бұрын
but if she always drinks her coffee with sugar then why did she taste the new one before putting in sugar ???
@jayfkaykaykay8386 жыл бұрын
Good point good point well played
@Gatsu5636 жыл бұрын
Maybe she puts sugar as usual and it was too sweet, so she knew it was the same cup. But why would she put sugar in the first cup of coffee if she saw a fly in it?
@mia_the_nerd13156 жыл бұрын
Maybe she was testing it to be sure it was different
@pilotgaruda6 жыл бұрын
she put the sugar after she saw the fly. She usually drink coffe without sugar
@mindfuless6745 жыл бұрын
@@mia_the_nerd1315 why would taste the coffee if see thought it once had a fly in it? She should of got up and went to Starbucks they only have ants in their coffee.
@bang-iamalive68833 жыл бұрын
Glass broken: Me: WHAT WHERE IS THE SHATTERED GLASS
@stormbreaker_1016 жыл бұрын
*sORE WA CHIGAU YO!* A lot of the riddles used evidence that wasn't mentioned in the text (sometimes the evidence was in the images, sometimes it wasn't friccin there are all)
@superiorduck21056 жыл бұрын
Crazy at Heart It bugs me that you didn't capitalize the s in "sore".
@Isabella-zy3sj6 жыл бұрын
10/10 Reference
@azield.13396 жыл бұрын
I think you're right. The one with the the coffee didn't make since. I didn't know they put sugar in coffee. Second of all, they didn't say there was sugar in the coffee.
@superiorduck21056 жыл бұрын
Isabella 27 lol
@stick39156 жыл бұрын
Jada Fisher they could have added an info like "a woman with a sweet tooth" to hint about the sugar
@himprabalkaushik46375 жыл бұрын
Hold on smart arse..how bout this.(man shot dead inside car) he was shot somewhere else and then the body was placed in the car)
@christinamaxwell55485 жыл бұрын
Himprabal Kaushik I was saying the same thing
@Kallasticot5 жыл бұрын
thought so too because THERE MUST BE gundowder on his clothes, with or without wind, it will stick on fiber.
@trejosworld5 жыл бұрын
I was thinking he was shot and trying to drive himself to the hospital LoL
@lauraduplooy5 жыл бұрын
@@trejosworld Me too! He was definitely shot elsewhere.
@hongphan31665 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking too
@ninjasjams37766 жыл бұрын
How am I suppose to know if there was ice or windows in the building or glass ?
@Kyle-xi8up6 жыл бұрын
The title of the riddle is "Ice Tea" and the narrator said that they were drinking iced tea
@no1ification6 жыл бұрын
iced tea doesn't require ice in it >.>
@nikosalad2566 жыл бұрын
The one with the building, it mentioned that the detective opened the windows facing the mans body
@caseyogden71056 жыл бұрын
Lil Trump the best Ice tea is more like a slush
@resolutecub99776 жыл бұрын
Mk_cmk igneous He said it was Ice Tea and that the detective opened the windows on every floor.... I will give you some wiggle room on the Bike one and Convertible.
@flyingdawghype40654 жыл бұрын
Plot Twist: The Fly Wants A Cup Of Coffee
@lordkered6 жыл бұрын
These riddles have multiple solutions
@zu-kun59456 жыл бұрын
true
@havanathekitty98306 жыл бұрын
Ya but they only made one to challenge your brain I mean that's what challenges is all about
@chaosgaming30276 жыл бұрын
derekmcgoldrick true
@spian6 жыл бұрын
This is more of a "play on words" than detective mysteries. So many facts and wording diverted purposely in order for you to picture it differently. They subtly hint something in a hidden manner, purposely, but if they mentioned "the window was closed" flat out it would be easier. So of course for this video segment they will do that on purpose. Proving my point even more that they diverted it will clear intent. The question mark could have very well meant a guess on who did it. In the real world that wouldnt hold up if you decided to sue. To name a few. Very disappointing.
@IRocBAPESTA6 жыл бұрын
exactly what i said about the Last one
@yogbha37666 жыл бұрын
yogesh battarai if waana know to add if wanna know to
@foolishwizard45416 жыл бұрын
This isn't the real world though.
@hughg.rection62846 жыл бұрын
8. Or he jumped from the roof...
@ianisuru92306 жыл бұрын
You are a genius 😂😂😂
@chiranthscindia14216 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@evphoric86986 жыл бұрын
exactly
@Dazardly6 жыл бұрын
If they saw him 'jump out a window' then couldn't they have at least told him which one? And what if the window has a ledge on it that he could stand from first? He might have closed it behind him to make sure no one came up and tried to save him through the open window.
@Name-uc7kt6 жыл бұрын
yeh but they dont know whether he jumped out a window, why would they?
@reborninchrist80745 жыл бұрын
What if he didnt wanted to reveal his identity and putted question mark on the note 🤔
@oliviahorne93115 жыл бұрын
cool name because the note also said “that’s who threw the snowball”
@teresaf12905 жыл бұрын
Death in the car: The car door could have also been open when the man was shot, then locked and closed afterwards.
@user-bt4rx8bn4k5 жыл бұрын
yeah
@kmariep24255 жыл бұрын
Or the person was shot by someone inside the car.
@MrModel435 жыл бұрын
My car doors lock automatic after 2 min, even if key is in the igniction.
@celam10955 жыл бұрын
Or he could have been shot outside of the car and died trying to get to the hospital
@CRISTIANO187865 жыл бұрын
@@celam1095 exatcly my thought
@taifun95796 жыл бұрын
Number 6 how did the roof get up again?
@marshalluiz6 жыл бұрын
Taifun yep that's y my answer was because the killer put his body inside the car or he tried escaping after he got shot
@Diana_M086 жыл бұрын
I thought the same thing. My initial instinct was that he was shot somewhere else and got in the car as an attempt to escape or get to the hospital...
@curlywurly72746 жыл бұрын
Taifun yes i know my guess was it was somthing else not a gun like a container of something in the car not a gun
@MerjiKei6 жыл бұрын
he was being targeted as he pressed whatever button brings it up. as it was going up he was shot and killed, the roof continuing to close by itself as ordered.
@cendywibowo23306 жыл бұрын
me too
@beschdl99486 жыл бұрын
"Everyone in the room looked at the door", 20 seconds later "The man did not look at the door"
@AbuOsama296 жыл бұрын
“ and the lawyer with the defendant look at them”
@JK-fu7vo6 жыл бұрын
Beschdl it's from a korean movie the client
@Pinesal6 жыл бұрын
At first I understood that as the Layer was with the defendant and looked at them. Not necessarily that the defendant also looked at them. They should have said "the layer AND the defendant looked at them.
@FreaackyFreaky6 жыл бұрын
HAHAHA I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING. these are so rearded
@CedevitaKrompiric6 жыл бұрын
The writing says "The lawyer with the defendant look at them" the guy speaking says "the lawyer with the defendant lookS at them" bad delivery.
@victorstriga5 жыл бұрын
Why this video has so many likes? 90% of the comments are from people who complain about the illogical riddles lol
@rosyranisingh98205 жыл бұрын
7:57 I thought that was so because the lawyer couldn't proove anything and wasted the court's time. 2:40 The man could have been sharing his room with someone else. So, he could have actually been mistaken.
@AarushP5 жыл бұрын
@@cluky-wf3hz what if it was a new person goes to the elevator down to his floor then go to the same room as the one above him
@Yurerira4 жыл бұрын
It was also possible he was trying to look for a room of a friend and was accidentally given the wrong room number.
@ultra-flamaxus4 жыл бұрын
Could be possible But he should have checked the room number before knocking.
@zackhudon49566 жыл бұрын
At 10:18 the person talking says suspected but the text says suspended
@kikaiedwards90886 жыл бұрын
Real detective work 11/10
@rrthesavage52306 жыл бұрын
TrickTime exactly
@jackross33856 жыл бұрын
TrickTime your a knob
@laurapreston67896 жыл бұрын
Lol
@floriangonzales12376 жыл бұрын
Smuggler,the man riding on a bike!how the smuggler goes back to the side of the border wherin he is bringing the bikes to the other side?is he walking back by foot?
@TheAndigjergo6 жыл бұрын
Florian Gonzales I totally agree with you about this
@ღgღ-d5p6 жыл бұрын
wouldnt the officers realise that he had a different bike everytime he crossed back???
@johnrflinn6 жыл бұрын
Good point. Long walk but maybe he had a partner that gave him a lift.
@oofy35636 жыл бұрын
He probably smuggled bikes from both locations (so he would get one bike from the first place then drop it off and either they give him a bike to take back or he has another job that requires him to do the same thing)
@warreng6756 жыл бұрын
He would of have to, of walked their in the first place
@risulnx7724 жыл бұрын
In the 5th one, the question doesn't mention that the woman had had the coffee before shouting!! Bye the way I would have shouted to check the waiter's expression to deduce is it the changed cup or not!!
@jesuschristmas22926 жыл бұрын
#4 is completely ridiculous. Just because the man wasn't looking at the door he was immediately considered guilty? Seriously? Sure, him not looking at the door is at least somewhat suspicious, but that is just a mere suspicion it's not like it's evidence. I thought the reason why he was guilty because that was the final statement and the lawyer did not do a very good job defending him so that it was easy to decide that he was guilty.
@hintolime64196 жыл бұрын
... besides that they did say "EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM LOOKED AT THE DOOR." I was pretty mad about that.
@shynellwilscuc6 жыл бұрын
Yes... I thought it was the last thing the lawyer said too. He worded it to make it seem like his client was not guilty and told the jury and judge that they already have doubts about his client killing his wife... lol, does the last one match with the 4th one. Man kills his wife and ends up in court lol. 1 and 4.
@Nico-ex9nm6 жыл бұрын
How where we supposed to know that he wasn't looking at the door.
@mackiedonner316 жыл бұрын
Also the man lied
@rubyahamed55456 жыл бұрын
Hate
@TitanicMeteor6 жыл бұрын
Who else lies to themselves by pretending to feel good when you "solve" a riddle you have heard before.
@andr3m4xs0n56 жыл бұрын
TitanicMeteor me
@andr3m4xs0n56 жыл бұрын
TitanicMeteor just to be honest
@xxnate29xx116 жыл бұрын
Mee i got em right some
@katairox91606 жыл бұрын
Skyla Greenway i heard ? Blacksmith and Ice tea and hotel room one
@strawberrayy6 жыл бұрын
I SAID 8TH QUESTIONS CORRECT
@MorningStarCollective6 жыл бұрын
8/10. The iced tea and window one were both ridiculous. Edit: This apparently has 250+ likes now 😂.
@mooseoncaffeine6 жыл бұрын
the ice tea was, the window kinda is, but i have seen it before.
@asdasdasdad35906 жыл бұрын
what if he jumped from roof and not window?
@thebone49716 жыл бұрын
Cyanide7662 ....the literal name is called iced tea, so it has ice in it.
@Gemtekpest6 жыл бұрын
There's a great version of the iced tea riddle that is more complicated but makes more sense in terms of a plausible story: A man is watching a baseball game at his local bar when another man, we'll call him Tony, walks in and orders to scotches both on the rocks. When the drinks are served the first man asks to switch with Tony and they do. Tony drinks his drink quickly, talks for a few minutes and leaves while the other man stays behind to finish his drink and the baseball game. A few hours later, he is dead and Tony knows it. Answer: Tony is a hit man for the maffia and the other man is a snitch who is paranoid that there's a hit out on him. Hes naturally suspicious when Tony orders him a drink, but after switching glasses, feels much safer. What he doesn't know is that Tony has done his research. Tony knows this guy is a baseball fan and will slowly sip his scotch during the long game. So he arranges with the bartender to have the poisoned ice cubes added to both drinks and his assassination is successful.
@christinahiorns23816 жыл бұрын
Dr. Mike Zahalsky same
@justchillin78965 жыл бұрын
OMFG the one in the Ice I remember my teacher asking us about in 6th grade and I was the only person to figure out the answer in my class so I was a bit excited about seeing that one lol.
@spellcaster15016 жыл бұрын
dude, so you never give enough information
@lillianking2266 жыл бұрын
That's the point, he only gives the information that the detective would know when first entering the crime scene.
@williamarmstrong2016 жыл бұрын
lillian king he is giving less than the detective has for example during the car one ,we don't know what type of car he has, but a detective would
@aofimusic6 жыл бұрын
William Armstrong i think the car one (get shot in the car, but theres no bullet hole anywhere), the type of the car was inform in the picture
@angelanguyen33726 жыл бұрын
The cup of coffee one had different answers, and not information. Like wouldn't she see the fly while mixing or putting sugar in her drink? I said because she already drank out of it and they didn't refill it.
@angelanguyen33726 жыл бұрын
Yeah I thought of lipstick as well. Like there are a few answers to the coffee one
@finnmartin2816 жыл бұрын
I love how most of these would be impossible to figure out unless you either had more details or were actually there.
@metroidguy336 жыл бұрын
does the bike smuggler just walk back
@Jinppa6 жыл бұрын
If you can smuggle a bike to Mexico, what makes you think you can't smuggle a bike to US?
@mindless_jester5 жыл бұрын
Jinppa thas te same thing
@nibbashamble81295 жыл бұрын
@@Jinppa cos then the bike wouldn't be in Mexico anymore
@Jinppa5 жыл бұрын
Cephalon Flabergaster plz sub Do you really think both countries do not have a market for smuggled and stolen goods? Dude...
@nibbashamble81295 жыл бұрын
@@Jinppa ye but then the amount of bikes in each country would still be the same
@mahadevanmaha95633 жыл бұрын
Last one was like the scene from THE DEPARTED. "I gave you the wrong address, but you showed up at the right one!"
@nikko68836 жыл бұрын
6. Makes no sense what so ever, if he says the doors were locked, that means the roof was closed too, you CANNOT open/close it if the car is locked...
@nikko68836 жыл бұрын
Also, 5 and others have various answers for example because the coffee wasn’t as hot as the previous, also, who puts sugar in if you clearly see a dead bug in it?
@nikko68836 жыл бұрын
2. Could have been because the gun was placed on the desk in a position that wouldn’t be possible if he shot himself
@subblonde31016 жыл бұрын
also #2 I said because it was a womans voice or another persons voice on the tape recorder.....that could have also been right.....there were more than 1 right answer for the 'riddles' so it was kinda dumb.
@Ταραμοσαλατα-ε2χ6 жыл бұрын
And in 1, how was i supposed to figure out that they didn't tell him where the crime scene was?Nothing like that was implied it just says "they informed him that his wife had been killed and he had to arrive at the crime scene right away" or I'm just dumb and I don't understand a thing...also there was probably blood in his car so I thought this was the reason he was suspected..
@nekogod6 жыл бұрын
A more plausible scenario for number 6 is that the guy was shot and managed to crawl away to his car and lock himself in (to feel safer) but bled to death before he could drive to get help
@evoljfe485 жыл бұрын
Ok if everyone in the room looked at the door then how would they know the killer didn’t look at the door🤔 cause they’re all paying attention to the door and not what the killer is doing.
@manokhan15764 жыл бұрын
But camras....🤔🤔🤔
@robotsanity41034 жыл бұрын
Mano Khan Not only that but they say clearly that EVERYONE in the room looked at the door
@variantdm57744 жыл бұрын
You see, I thought that she knew because her coffee wasn't as hot anymore. Or there was a fly wing in it.
@safiaea27964 жыл бұрын
Not only that, what if he was aware of the lawyers plan? Maybe he told him before about it, they usually talk about their defense plan BEFORE going to court sooo that is no argument even if they would have mentioned that he didn't look at the door
@ranjeetakumari85873 жыл бұрын
But bright side is paying attention 😛
@drumbum79996 жыл бұрын
So the guy was shot dead and then closed the roof on his convertible? makes sense
@robloxoxer4286 жыл бұрын
Drum bum yeah I thought someone was in the car with him but apparently not
@ashmitchowdhury89946 жыл бұрын
+Drum bum exactly
@williamhathaway48376 жыл бұрын
Actually some convertible are controlled by sound so it would open after the gunshot and close back up automatically
@mehcaca6 жыл бұрын
William Hathaway ...what? The convertible’s roof was open before the gunshot. No way could it open as soon as the gunshot sound was detected, as you claim. Those things take a couple seconds to open/close. And really, convertible roofs automatically open to loud sounds? Why?
@ashmitchowdhury89946 жыл бұрын
+William Hathaway by the these "sounds" are usually human voices and not those loud gunshots
@ivanstayner88184 жыл бұрын
Ok, someone hears a gunshot. Runs in, sees the scene. Sees a recorder. Rewinds it, to hear it. And then calls police. That is very out there and I'm sure no one would replay a recorder after seeing a suicide, but who knows.
@hintolime64196 жыл бұрын
7:55 YOU SAID "EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM" LOOKED AT THE DOOR
@yeetyeet40296 жыл бұрын
I guess it does say “and the lawyer with the defendant looks at them” but I see your point and I think it’s kind of dumb as well
@KanyeNuts6 жыл бұрын
Hinto Lime yeah that’s what I thought too
@vinaygupta30266 жыл бұрын
Ya bro ..you are right ...
@HVoltage1526 жыл бұрын
It should say "Everybody in the room looks at the door while the lawyer with the defendant looks at them."
@no.one.a1136 жыл бұрын
I think the answer was kinda dumb. Maybe he had told the lawyer to say it, and was more interested in how the others would react than in seeing what he already knew was going to happen. I thought the answer would be that since that since the wife didn't show up, they had just made it up to prove that the others weren't sure she was dead. And when they had made that up, they didn't seem reliable and were therefore verdicted guilty.
@DY-ws1rh6 жыл бұрын
For the mysterious man who knocked on the door thinking it was his, I thought she was suspicious because if he thought it was his then he would've gone to the room beside hers, because if he thought her room was his, then her room would've been close to his. But he rushed to the elevator instead if going to another room. Make sense? I didn't really know how to explain. Reply if you get what Im saying XD
@astolennova6 жыл бұрын
Unless he realized it was the right room, but the wrong floor. He then went to the elevator, went up (or down) a flight, knocked on his room door (so that his spouse could let him in) and had a pleasant evening.
@lucyli79066 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought too
@LilMiro6 жыл бұрын
skip to Thats what i thought too
@sworupashreegautam17546 жыл бұрын
skip to I thought the same..
@thesaturdayproject63456 жыл бұрын
Thats what i thought too, also how do we know that he simply didnt come with someone else and that he wasn't knoking for them to open
@Benjamin-dd9gg5 жыл бұрын
Who tf smuggles bicycles?
@CountryLivingOnTheFarm5 жыл бұрын
BlazterKing lol 😂 I know, right ?
@veronicabalaguer24425 жыл бұрын
The man on the riddle.
@___asdfghjkl68854 жыл бұрын
JUST THAT MAN. THIS IS SO RIDICULOUS.
@No_name-0004 жыл бұрын
@@___asdfghjkl6885 hahahahhahahhaa.....its just a riddle 😂😂
@ultra-flamaxus4 жыл бұрын
*ABicycleSmuggler* 😂
@moondash4755 жыл бұрын
10:18 the voice says suspected but the word says suspended😂
@noelleclee6 жыл бұрын
I don’t think the investigators got 15 seconds to solve the mystery.
@roshanpalsingh80896 жыл бұрын
Theres the pause button.......
@AtomicSuperior6 жыл бұрын
uoy said is
@waisu34096 жыл бұрын
Can anyone understand what a joke is?
@noelleclee6 жыл бұрын
Waisu THANK YOU
@JonathanChute6 жыл бұрын
My only complaint is that the instructions stated to watch the riddle, which implied that the video was important. However, the video played no role, it was purely contextual clues within the wording of the riddle. This leads to the problem of Riddle #7 "Ice Tea". The video shows 6 glasses with none containing ice. They state the poison is contained within the ice. I can only assume the ice was in the pitcher, as the glasses clearly only contain tea, no ice visualized. This means that the pitcher's ice would melt, causing the poison to leak into the drink, so that the girl who is drinking quicker would actually have the higher risk of poison. The riddle, when accompanied with the video, becomes unsolvable, as the video lies about the content of the glasses. We could assume that the two women would have ice in their ice tea, however, what we're shown is that they are not, so the answer makes no sense. Otherwise, the riddles are fine... some force you to make assumptions. The bicycle smuggler, for example, could have been smuggling clothing, such as the hat he proudly flaunts, he could also be smuggling the sand himself, leading customs to believe that it's an item within the sand, not the sand itself.
@AlexTheOilersFan6 жыл бұрын
Jonathan Chute I agree. Some of the visuals to represent the Riddle don't match up with the riddle themselves. The building suicide one and the ice tea one are the best examples since something is mentioned in the answers that isn't shown in the visuals.
@Blizzard56k6 жыл бұрын
I think the video helped in some way. The car one, I guessed the answer based on the picture, which was a convertible. And my answer for the court room came to me when I noticed the defendant had his dead down slightly. Made me re-read the text and gave away the answer.
@8bitdynamite966 жыл бұрын
I do agree some if the pictures can be misleading. But you can't rely entirely on the pictures if the information in the narration is enough. For example the building suicide narration gave plenty info as to how he solved the case, the visual was not needed. Where as the ice tea one you can assume using deductive reasoning that the ice was not in the pitcher because that would mean the girl who drank more would be poisened. So that means the ice had to be in the glasses and from there it's history.
@Mrduck-lq4sd6 жыл бұрын
this video rigged
@tbeau966 жыл бұрын
I could only solve a few of these "riddles". Probably some of the worst mysteries I've ever heard in my life. The coffee one for example. Are you kidding me? She put sugar in her coffee? Sorry, I didn't know I had to be a psychic to solve these...
@readifdumb6 жыл бұрын
Without the pictures, that one doesn't make sense. I thought that the drink went down a bit because when you take out the fly you obviously have to take out a bit of the drink aswell.
@72fja6 жыл бұрын
Also, what kind of savage puts sugar in their coffee
@-ninetailed-71726 жыл бұрын
I was thinking that it might be the sugar but since you can't see sugar in the coffee and they never said she drank it after the waiter returned, I decided it couldn't be sugar. :/
@strangedailythings6 жыл бұрын
There are many answers possible for this one, which makes it a weak riddle I think. For example if the waiter comes back with another cup of coffee that has no fly in it. And you drink your coffee with sugar. We can all agree the waiter will be bringing you one without sugar. You don't need to taste coffee to determine whether it has a fly in it, so why on earth would someone who drinks their coffee with sugar, take a sip of the unsweetened coffee before they add their sugar?? That would be like taking a sip of hot water before you add the teabag..
@lilliasxd48606 жыл бұрын
she put sugar in her coffee despite the fly being in the cup....xd
@amopotato79534 жыл бұрын
If the man in the car shot his wife and he wiped off fingerprints, why would he not be a suspect? His fingerprints should have been all over the car. Would he have been able to wipe all of his fingerprints off of the car?
@clg19996 жыл бұрын
These don’t make sense!!!!! You didn’t say the window was closed
@ArmanOssiLoko6 жыл бұрын
He did state that the detective opens the window(s), though.
@dbyrd926 жыл бұрын
Yeah it said he opened the window, they just weren’t specific with his actions on each floor. They were meaning he opened the window and threw the cigarette out on each floor but all they say is “he repeated the action on each floor”, that being said immediately after him throwing the cigarettes which makes it seem like he just repeated the action of throwing a cigarette out of the window (the singular action), not the entire series of actions
@MELLUMOADA6 жыл бұрын
Dillon Byrd but to throw the cigarette out he opens the window. They would specify if one of the windows was already open. Why if he opened one would he not have to open the others?
@mia_the_nerd13156 жыл бұрын
It says he opened the window and did the same for every floor
@reenasharma82226 жыл бұрын
That's why it was a riddle
@tippy-san70936 жыл бұрын
I thought that the "suspicious man" in "number 9" was suspicious because he walked in the direction of the elevators after mixing up the rooms. That wouldn't make sense if he thought that 'her room' were 'his room.' He probably would've at least known what floor he was on; and only got the specific room on that floor mixed up. Right?🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
@vampgamez30366 жыл бұрын
same
@keepmeinstitchesss6 жыл бұрын
You gotta look at the perspective in both the victims and murders eyes. Think like them.
@e443productions96 жыл бұрын
It was both that AND knocking on the door
@tippy-san70936 жыл бұрын
Gorgeousklutz98 Kad: She called the police because he had knocked on his own door, and that wouldn't make any logical sense because there's no reason to knock on your own door. I realize this. I was just stating my thought process before I knew the answer.
@SmithDoe6 жыл бұрын
Tippy - san : It could make sense actually to knock at his own door. Let's say he could have been at the hotel with his wife (mistress) and forgot his key inside the room, so he knocks for his wife to open. Seeing it's not his wife, he realizes that he got the wrong room.
@WEWANTJESUS6 жыл бұрын
The third one he could of jump from roof
@dishany69986 жыл бұрын
Angel Jr Gonzalez clearly says that he jump out from a window
@Di-xp7uc6 жыл бұрын
Dishany Sayanthan Well then it's not a suicide. Of he jumped.
@resolutecub99776 жыл бұрын
ꓳꓠꓲꓷ-ꓓꓲꓠꓳ Um..... You know what suicide is right?
@Di-xp7uc6 жыл бұрын
Resolute Cub Oh my bad, i meant if he jumped off for himself then it's not a murderer. It is Suicide.
@glassunicorn15256 жыл бұрын
Dishany Sayanthan yeah but if you analyze it like a real situation like a detective would that is a very valid point.
@ScottQueskekapow3 жыл бұрын
1:30 questions mark blacksmith.. so that would be mark blacksmith.. also.. if the snowball was that strong to break the window.. why isnt there glass all over the floor? If the snowball was really thrown from the outside, there would be glass on the floor.. im getting suspicious...
@shravanthiyag6 жыл бұрын
#4 the court riddle... you say everyone in the room including the judge and jury looked at the door, then you say the suspect wasn't looking at the door... wth?
@akoiace6 жыл бұрын
shravanthiyag ikr 😂😂😂
@lexxibaker6 жыл бұрын
and how would they know he wasn't looking if they were looking at the door..
@bryan93636 жыл бұрын
shravanthiyag nah i thought the same thing it says “and the lawyer with the defendant looks at them” revealing that they weren’t looking at the door but instead at the judge and jury
@arcaine39076 жыл бұрын
the question is rather if everybody except suspect were looking at the door then who noticed that suspect wasn't looking lol
@benhopkins28526 жыл бұрын
Majority of the riddles are flawed and do not give enough information. Especially the bicycle smuggler and the court room one. Maybe if they were worded correctly it might actually be a riddle 😂
@yikes30496 жыл бұрын
4:13 ok, so I just assumed we were talking about iced tea, not iceinmyfuckingtea, because if you had said water with ice in it or specified that the tea contained ice, then i would have been ok. But you say ice tea, and every time i go to a restaeaunt and ask for ice tea, i get ice tea, not tea with ice in it. also who gets 5 glasses of ice tea anyway? this is why america has an obesity epidemic.
@robertemerson91096 жыл бұрын
Sh33p Haha while I agree with you, I don't think Ice tea is a major cause of obesity.
@clb74386 жыл бұрын
Sh33p iced tea only makes one obese if they put sugar in it. There is in fact the option to NOT add sugar to ones iced tea. Also,,, the only time iced tea would not have ice in it is if you were drinking it out of a bottle. Lastly,,, its ICED tea not ice tea.
@TjTurdle6 жыл бұрын
Sh33p doesn't iced tea usually have ice though? I dknt drink it myself but if it doesn't then that's false advertisement.
@elduxarino10976 жыл бұрын
I mean, the dude is american speaking and Ice Tea here is understood to be tea with ice in it. Communications break down. Also, ice tea is fine is huge amounts if you don't add sugar.
@BBaby11116 жыл бұрын
Ice tea doesn’t have sugar in it, meaning it isn’t bad and won’t make you obese, maybe a little bloated, but not obese
@toblerusseta5 жыл бұрын
Moral of the story: dont name your kid question mark
@AarushP5 жыл бұрын
Yep
@veronicabalaguer24425 жыл бұрын
Exactly.
@xxtwistedmasterxx15324 жыл бұрын
lol
@samtheman94884 жыл бұрын
the kids name was Mark...not question Mark
@nandinimd23874 жыл бұрын
Or mark
@Anonymous-gn8wd4 жыл бұрын
The best investigators take their time (not 15 seconds) and no information can be left out.
@jerryjacobsunny55746 жыл бұрын
8:43 smuggling sand is high value these days
@rixtrojan78336 жыл бұрын
Not in a desert I think
@stick39156 жыл бұрын
Not in bags though... The revenue outweighs the transportation cost, haha
@AKALeon-ir8ww6 жыл бұрын
the punisher that's where you are wrong, he is smuggling himself to the other side
@tashnahtv60986 жыл бұрын
Lol... It really could be that. The bicycle smuggling isn't logical to me. He crosses to and fro on it.
@tashnahtv60986 жыл бұрын
Lol... perhaps. Lots of glass material to make fake diamonds. Something special about that particular sand.
@Goldenrod69016 жыл бұрын
Car alt. answer: the man was shot while he was outside his car. He got in the car and tried to get away but succomed to his wounds. Coffee alt. answer: there was her lipstick on the rim of the "new" glass as she had already taken a sip of the coffee.
@juliachase75306 жыл бұрын
Raptorsaurlophus draws or the bug was still in the coffee
@nicole-ps2od6 жыл бұрын
Julia C. The waiter took out the bug from the coffee, and gave the same one back.
@erinmeakins20506 жыл бұрын
i thought the same with the coffee one or that the coffee was cold
@lucindarobbins80566 жыл бұрын
I was thinking there might’ve been s fly leg left
@DrRank6 жыл бұрын
If he smuggles bicycles across the border (which, by the way, is an absolutely ridiculous thing to smuggle), how does he get back over to smuggle the next one?
@Baxocj6 жыл бұрын
i just assumed it was the same bike he used, as any resonable person would assume
@DrRank6 жыл бұрын
But then what's the point of smuggling it? The whole point of a smuggle - nay, the definition of a smuggle - is to get it from one side of a border to the other without the authorities being aware of it. So he can't be using the same bike.
@Baxocj6 жыл бұрын
no i mean, while trying to think about the riddle, i didnt think about the bike bc i was just assuming he was using the same bike
@riftvallance20876 жыл бұрын
And since when are Mexican bikes illegal?
@marvcantave65906 жыл бұрын
if he had brought a whole bunch of bikes together they would make him pay duty, so he brought them 1 by 1, and since it was considered his personal vehicle then they can't make him pay for it
@xosummerdaysxo4 жыл бұрын
Some of these riddles have multiple plausible answers. SPOILER ALERT For example, look at riddle #5 (Fly in coffee) @6:06. The answer is that "she already put sugar in her previous cup of coffee". The riddle never mentioned sugar before that. The riddle could have said "she noticed a fly in her sweetened coffee", but it didn't. The riddle never mentions sugar. How are we supposed to assume she puts sugar in her coffee? It is also possible that the woman knew it was her cup of coffee because she had a lipstick stain on the rim of the cup of coffee. Neither sugar nor lipstick was mentioned in the riddle and both would be a reasonable guess.
@stopitcarry4653 жыл бұрын
Yes
@beedoubleu6 жыл бұрын
How about getting the important details in the pics right. Say like when the windows are supposed to be closed .. they're actually effing closed instead of looking wide open.. duhhhhhhhhhhh!
@isabelbody72786 жыл бұрын
C W the pictures are meant to through you off
@mr.gagreflex6 жыл бұрын
That's why they said that he opened it, you just didn't pay attention.
@zengara116 жыл бұрын
Watch TedEd, 10 times better riddles. They are real
@balkarranmangal12176 жыл бұрын
Through or throw?
@sessionjams27266 жыл бұрын
C W There also was not stated enough to rule out that someone unrelated to the incident had closed the window, leaving suicide still a potential manner of death. For example, an abandoned building can be used as a temporary shelter by a homeless person who might want the window closed, e.g., due to the weather factor, or so the building would continue to appear unoccupied.
@mobdishgaming99006 жыл бұрын
For number 2 i thought it would have been because he went straight to the elevator instead of going to another room
@coccoaray42006 жыл бұрын
MobdishGaming me too
@rajukarki41786 жыл бұрын
Same here🤔
@respectwahmen19926 жыл бұрын
That's was literally what I said in my mind
@user-hx3ry5yc8d6 жыл бұрын
I thought that too
@ConsumeristScroffa6 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought at first but then realised that knocking was more of a giveaway since the hotel could have multiple floors with rooms.
@dieplz27636 жыл бұрын
What if the guy from the "suicide" jumped from the ROOF and not the window. There was no statement saying access wasn't possible, so yea, it still could've been suicide :/ Edit: thankyou for the likes! Haha, it makes me feel smart lol :)
@jurnelissen72616 жыл бұрын
indeed
@dieplz27636 жыл бұрын
Kitten Lyric good point!!
@l_kc37946 жыл бұрын
Nice!!
@maiaashes96726 жыл бұрын
And that bicycle thing, the construction is hollow. He could have put something in there.