I know this training may seem odd to us Americans but it works! I had the opportunity to train with some of our host Army and RAF while over there. They may over do safety but that's a big part of what makes it work! Just because it is not the way we may do it does not make it wrong. I learned a great deal from those guys and that helped me so much over my 26 years with the US Army and Air Force.
@oldgitsknowstuff5 жыл бұрын
Hey, respects to you Yanks (it's a term of endearment). In 1940, we were fighting for our lives, and thankfully, this was before I arrived on this Earth. Respects to them all.
@johndonaldredmond39905 жыл бұрын
As others have noted, all the "British" soldiers are Canadians of 1st Cdn Inf Div. The film's advice is that which I was taught. "Shoot to kill" was also the title of a great Canadian Army training pamphlet of WWII. This film is a great time capsule of 1940.
@cyclonetaylor78385 жыл бұрын
I was trained under the "Shoot To Kill" method. I always laughed at the illustrations with the Indians and things like hugging your girlfriend pictures.
@willwallacetree5 жыл бұрын
'Well stab my vitals!' An Oscar for the script writer please...
@danielmarshall45875 жыл бұрын
It is jolly good.
@SexyLilSeaOtter5 жыл бұрын
Hello, what have we here? Or do these old eyes of mine deceive me?
@dougmapper33065 жыл бұрын
STAB MY VITALS, IT IS INDEED THE ENEMY I SAY, CHECK THE RANGE CARD OLD CHAP. WE'RE IN FOR A BINTY ROW
@beardoggin89635 жыл бұрын
Always fun watching films where they still taught hip fire
@MrAli1715 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant I am ex uk military the English playing the Germans was so funny
@peezebeuponyou37745 жыл бұрын
From the accents, I'm guessing they were Canadians.
@markrainford12195 жыл бұрын
What you on about ? They were real.
@scratchdog22165 жыл бұрын
Some of the dry British humor in the narration is great.
@roysterfutrell88895 жыл бұрын
I liked that platoon assault lesson. You can shoot up all the ammo you can carry in minutes. Then you're screwed.
@elpistolero93945 жыл бұрын
Mr Cholmendley Warner narrating?
@ThunderBuddy5 жыл бұрын
The range card is simple but I can see how it will work really well.
@proudyorkshireman77085 жыл бұрын
ThunderBuddy they are still printed on the side of the ration boxes
@MkVII5 жыл бұрын
The commentator is EV.H. Emmett, who did the voiceovers for Gaumont British News.
@gan9e5 жыл бұрын
5:58 It's Charles Hawtrey from Carry On fame... bullet fodder, actually I think he was the one who stood up at the end right out of the bushes like a silly Monty Python sketch...
@peezebeuponyou37745 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought- dead ringer.
@timan20395 жыл бұрын
As soon as Sgt.Major Mayber replied 'Sir' my mind went straight to Monty Python and that is lens through which I saw his part.
@urbanimage5 жыл бұрын
Monty Python certainly sprang to mind.
@peezebeuponyou37745 жыл бұрын
Same here- so much of it was pure Python, lol.
@kimchipig5 жыл бұрын
"What are you gonna do when a raving maniac attacks you with a pomegranate!"
@Beethoven805 жыл бұрын
"Transport blitzed!" Learned a new verb for my daily conversation.
@kahoki5 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is spot on as a source of Monty Python's British Army skit material.
@WelshRabbit5 жыл бұрын
KMcK, my thoughts exactly!!!!
@danielmarshall45875 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the upload.
@amy-joe57722 жыл бұрын
The Tommy gun was called the Chicago type writer
@oliversmith92005 жыл бұрын
"Is that the enemy moving about there? Stab my vitals it is the enemy!" {at 2:50} LOL
@chubbycatfish45734 жыл бұрын
16:49 That's some damn fine shooting.
@baronhyatt67295 жыл бұрын
I like how the Germans are equipped with British weaponry
@ianwoodward345 жыл бұрын
The soldiers (other than the sergeant-major) are all Canadians judging by the accents.
@sheriff00175 жыл бұрын
You can just make out the "CANADA" shoulder titles on some of them.
@stephenandersen46255 жыл бұрын
throwing a baseball is a tip off too
@oldgitsknowstuff5 жыл бұрын
Everybody laughs at our Home Guard, it was made into a series called 'Dad's army'. Ridiculous as it may have been portrayed, the Home Guard had many Old Dads with a great deal of experience. They had fought in WW1 and knew a thing or two about fighting the Hun. This training film appears to have a duologue that resembles a Canadian accent whilst the narrator instructs in perfect English. No matter......the best advice, however ridiculous it might appear was of the highest calibre at the time. Respects to all of them, and yes ! They did speak like that at the time.
@drpoundsign5 жыл бұрын
WW1..."shoulder to shoulder, Lads...leisurely walk up to the enemy lines, then cut the wire and shoot."
@77goofyguy4 жыл бұрын
If that was the highest caliber the no wonder the US had to bail out the UK 2 times in like 25 years...
@roybennett92842 жыл бұрын
What was the effectiveness of the bren against German planes early in the war?
@NickRatnieks5 жыл бұрын
It looks like the country around Longmoor Camp- or further north into Surrey- Chobham Ridges perhaps, where plenty of Canadians were based- not least the Inkerman Barracks. Those Germans appeared to be wearing WW1 era helmets and carrying Lee Enfield rifles. We also see the Boys anti-tank rifle -which was not very effective and was replaced by the PIAT.
@user-ou9ft9th3h2 жыл бұрын
Firing that anti-tank rifle at a tank seems like a bad idea.
@TheGrenadier975 жыл бұрын
I love the style of those old-school movies. A simpler language and a bit of good humor (I bet the "Germans" were a mock) but keeping things serious and instructive.
@tacomas96025 жыл бұрын
“Stab my vitals, it is the enemy!” LOL
@terencehayes98405 жыл бұрын
Great video
@andrewmckenna005 жыл бұрын
The guy with the tommy was a BOSS
@homer96015 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! this should be how our grandfathers fought against Japanese . Cheers from sri lanka
@thepman19645 жыл бұрын
What about pointed sticks?
@jeffjefferson26765 жыл бұрын
Hello, what they should have done is open fire in conjunction with the bren gun. So the rifles also start shooting when the bren gun starts.
@johnstafford68104 жыл бұрын
Great document of British Army training at the time ... by the Canadian Army
@tech9auto2234 жыл бұрын
My old grandad would've had a good laugh at this he told me once that even the anti tank guns of the time were bouncing off enemy armour like ping pong balls so the heavy cumbersome unwieldy rifle was useless he said he only ever saw one in England he didn't see any in france he was wounded in the battle for caen and i believe what he said about the anti tank rifle USELESS
@sullybiker65204 жыл бұрын
Armour progressed very fast during the war. The Boyes was designed to take on what were considered light tanks which did characterise the Panzer division at that time. By the time of the Normandy campaign the PzIV was the most common tank, with the odd PzV (Panther) and very occasional PzVI (Tiger). All the armies had AT rifles at the start, but nobody bothered with them by '44, hence PIAT, the Bazooka, and the German equivalents.
@jamesbulldogmiller5 жыл бұрын
-whoosh- -thump- “Precisely”
@daveybernard10565 жыл бұрын
good stuff
@rosewhite---5 жыл бұрын
4:28 sentry on alert like a coconut shy.
@demonprinces175 жыл бұрын
This is funny as a cartoon.
@michaeldenesyk31955 жыл бұрын
Those lads have Canadian accents. This is 1940, The Canadians were the only fully equipped troops to defend England right after after Dunkirk
@RasEli035 жыл бұрын
Are you sure that this isn't the 40's?
@jpguthrie66695 жыл бұрын
Nice to see the Germans are carrying Enfield rifles, our chaps can round up some extra ammo from the "death trap" after shooting to kill.
@godofimagination5 жыл бұрын
6:00 lol he has an Enfield.
@Ciborium5 жыл бұрын
Narrator: "'Ello, 'ello, 'ello. What's all this then?"
@gypsymanjeff21845 жыл бұрын
The good old days. When. One don't have to worry about batterys or electronics everyone stood a chance more or less.. Gr8 vids ..keep them coming..
@yourfabuloushappymann51545 жыл бұрын
"Jenkiins I'm afraid you used a bit too much ammo old boy.."
@ldmitruk5 жыл бұрын
Good job by Colonial Canuks.
@BELCAN575 жыл бұрын
The "German" troops are carrying British rifles. Bad form, wot.
@johnhuxley1655 жыл бұрын
I would think that any downing of combat aircraft by infantry weapons would be more of a one in a million shot or blind ass luck.
@michaelbevan32855 жыл бұрын
the use of section rifles as an anti aircraft system was used by the Russians from as far back as the Spanish Civil war and taught to all client state armies and was commonly used in Vietnam. Every Viet Cong and NVA soldier was taught to fire at aircraft with single or automatic fire as required. The logic was that if the soldier sat there and did nothing, it increased his sense of vulnerability so he might as well shoot back, on the basis that he might hit the crew or a vulnerable engine. American pilots in Vietnam were initially scornful that rifle fire could affect them but soon learned to have respect for what was called "the golden BB", as jet aircraft, full of vulnerable hydraulic and fuel systems could be brought down or badly damaged by simple rifle fire. It was common for even fast jets to return from missions to find rifle bullet holes in the airframe and wings, that they had not noticed in the flight.
@oldgundog47055 жыл бұрын
In 1969 I saw the damage done by one rifle bullet that destroyed the radar unit on a navy A7.
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
And all the "German" soldiers are carrying British Enfield SMLE rifles. You'd think the Brits could have scared up some Mauser 98k rifles from somewhere.
@ThunderBuddy5 жыл бұрын
The film makers probably did not have time to acquire them as they would have a filming schedule to stick to, and remember this was way before digital cameras so there is extra logistics of film reel to think about.
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
@@ThunderBuddy Depends on when the movie was made. If it was after 1940 then the British had a fairly substantial stock of captured 98k's. If it was before the battle for France then they probably had very few.
@ThunderBuddy5 жыл бұрын
@@sarjim4381 I imagine this was filmed in 1939 as they are still using the AT rifle and regard it as one of the best weapons for dealing with tanks. Possibly this was made at the start of the war when things were quiet aside from the occasional skirmish.
@jdisdetermined5 жыл бұрын
1:21 "off we go then.."
@orcarcher5 жыл бұрын
"Hun smasher" xD
@ecrusch5 жыл бұрын
Seems like common sense, but always good to go over.
@mohdfitriothman58925 жыл бұрын
Wau....terbaik
@festusbojangles70273 жыл бұрын
14:28
@RasEli035 жыл бұрын
0:06 this is the closest to a German machingun the video gets 10:50 comedy
@CaspianWint4 жыл бұрын
That dug in section were Canadian
@andyf42925 жыл бұрын
theyre marching Very close to each other....
@snowflakemelter11725 жыл бұрын
Why the hell has that guy got a golf ball stuck to his face ?
@eliasdiaz20562 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Eric Cartman from south park
@ohredhk5 жыл бұрын
did anybody actually shot down an WWII warplane with the techniqe they shown in the film with bolt action rifle?
@simonyip59785 жыл бұрын
ohredhk many photos of troops firing bolt action rifles and light machine guns exist. If for example, if a whole battalion of 3 or 4 rifle companies and a heavy weapons company were under attack by low flying enemy aircraft, many hundreds or maybe thousands of rounds could be fired in a short time, and a few lucky shots could theoretically hit a vital part of the plane or the crew. The fact that many armies trained it's troops to fire at enemy aircraft indicates that it was believed to be possible to down enemy planes using rifles.
@exexpat115 жыл бұрын
Flight of the Intruder in Vietnam. At low altitudes even a Mosin Nagant can take out a slow moving jet if it hits just right. A bullet hitting a vital component or the pilot. A B-52 crash in Guam was caused by a local taking shots at them with a 22 long rifle as they came in to land. Guess the local thought it was funny or the plane was armored.
@jameslangham98544 жыл бұрын
@@simonyip5978 Even if ineffective at shooting down there are two major advantages to doing it: 1. Morale effect - especially after the issues with air attacks in 1940 2. Morale effect on the enemy - the more lead flying at you the less you will fly straight and therefore accuracy reduces
@janezjonsa31655 жыл бұрын
Monty Python, as a shrink for this writer/producer. Eh, dead 40 years ago...
@thehistoadian5 жыл бұрын
Lol the Soldiers are Canadian in it
@scottleft36724 жыл бұрын
Here come the Stukas...."fix bayonettes".
@lukethompson79705 жыл бұрын
“Remember shoot to kill” lmao
@exexpat115 жыл бұрын
WW2 "Shoot to Kill". Later Wars... "Shoot to wound. It takes two men to drag their wounded back to cover and the enemy expends resources treating wounded."
@chubbycatfish45734 жыл бұрын
^^ fuddlore
@andyf42925 жыл бұрын
its VERY monty python
@andyf42925 жыл бұрын
Mr and Mrs Watson can not be seen....
@daveturner60065 жыл бұрын
Never shoot at anyone further than 300yrds away...they might go away.
@Hellohallo4 жыл бұрын
i bet many brits where surpised these wherent the german tactics at all..
@Strike_Raid5 жыл бұрын
I think the first burst from the Thompson should have been a little longer, and definitely aimed, not from the hip.
@rosewhite---5 жыл бұрын
4:05 by 1940s the British had still learned nothing about camouflage but instead dug trenches with obvious support stakes and then made a flat parapet to make it easy for the Germans to snipe them. 25 years previously the Germans had good sport sniping British soldiers in similar trenches while German snipers put camouflage on their helmets and have messy parapets to hide their movements.
@umt1cardiff5 жыл бұрын
Rose White you missed the information given by the narator about removing the cover to allow the audiance to see them 1.50 Also as for 25 years before the germans puting " cammo on there helmets " there is not much point in looking like a bush when all around is just MUD
@TheDieselbutterfly5 жыл бұрын
Bobs your uncle
@vrisbrianm47203 жыл бұрын
14:46 - "bad...very bad, VERY BAD INDEED IN FACT, *BLOODY AWFUL* ! lol, how British.
@duckslayer925 жыл бұрын
Lol so British it's rediculous. I don't think US ever ended a film in rhymes. Lol ol' Jerry will never see that cup 'a tea.
@martinwarne71835 жыл бұрын
Cuppa rosie
@gavinhudson52514 жыл бұрын
Rhyme helps with memory.
@yfelwulf5 жыл бұрын
According to the Head of WW2 Sniping the Brit soldier could not hit anything his words if the war was decided by Rifle fire Britain would have lost. After WW1 all firearms were confiscated fearing Revolution. By WW2 most men had never seen a firearm and training was supplied by WW1 Veteran's.
@willwallacetree5 жыл бұрын
Confiscated? Nonsense. There was plenty of opportunity for marksmanship training and firearm ownership if appropriate through the 1920s and 1930s. As per the Great War before, most casualties were caused by artillery, and rifle fire was a much less significant factor than we would think.
@T8Hants5 жыл бұрын
Utter ignorant rubbish, shooting had never been more popular as sport then it was between the wars, and if basic shooting skills were being taught by WW1 vets it would have been based on a considerable amount of experience from an army that even the Germans admit were the best shots in the world.
@jberry19825 жыл бұрын
Well maybe if they only used panzer 1 or 2 maybe weak spots on panzer3 but if you think an anti tank rifle or 2pounder is gonna do more than piss off a panzer 4 or Panther or Tiger 1 or Tiger 2 your in deep Doo Doo LoL
@Romanov1175 жыл бұрын
The British started to use 57mm Anti-Tank around 1944. They have a 90mm+ penetration.
@jeriksson76865 жыл бұрын
Those so called helmets! haha
@alexwilliamson14865 жыл бұрын
Jesus...we Brits went to war with some dire anti-tank weapons...most German tanks were impervious to any disabling hits from Boys and 2pdr.
@snowflakemelter11725 жыл бұрын
Nope, the most common German tank in 39 - 40 was the Panzer II which the 2 pdr could defeat.
@alexwilliamson14865 жыл бұрын
Rufus Chucklebutty Yep, i said MOST not all, if you read my post ?
@dave-yj9mc5 жыл бұрын
@@alexwilliamson1486 Better re read yourself... Rufus is right. Most tanks could be defeated by the 2 pdr. Your original post should say "a few" ... were impervious... or "some"... or whatever lol... I enjoy these old training videos!
@alexwilliamson14865 жыл бұрын
dave nope, no need to read again, a former friend of mine works at Bovington, I asked him about the 2pdr, and I’m ex/Royal Artillery, I’m good with what I wrote first, thanks for your concern though? Lord Gort himself wrote that “The 2pdr is good but only just, we must mount something better and more armour on it” This was after experiences in 1940, with the BEF. Germany were not fielding many Mark IIs mid to late war.I am making my point in this context.I too enjoy these old posts.
@willwallacetree5 жыл бұрын
I would genuinely love to look at the differences in performance between the 2pdr (37mm?) of 80 years ago and current 30 or 40mm cannons mounted on APC's. I guess there wouldn't be much in it.
@conantdog5 жыл бұрын
Firearms fantasy 🤭
@AliasUndercover5 жыл бұрын
Funny how you learn all this stuff from playing video games.
@jamesberlo42985 жыл бұрын
Shooting down a Stuka with Rifles??? O.K. maybe when parked.
@michaelledford47515 жыл бұрын
Jesus,i saw nothing like this durring my 3 combat tours USMC 1/9 Vietnam this is laughable.
@stephenandersen46255 жыл бұрын
a couple of decades (and a different enemy) makes a big difference.
@pauldemospdemosp98935 жыл бұрын
@@stephenandersen4625 And did you win in Vietnam? I am pretty sure the Germans lost WW 2
@stephenandersen46255 жыл бұрын
@@pauldemospdemosp9893 what?
@Colt-tf6xf5 жыл бұрын
Paul de Mos pdemosp Patton kicked their asses or the Beatles would still be singing at Oktoberfest