Gajin: the wellington it's a good plane very survivable Me : trying to spawn without get killed after 1 minute
@r0yal_0perat0r3 жыл бұрын
Bruh it’s underrated af
@tizanikandothers3 жыл бұрын
@@kamov52510 oh my English
@zaksmeu44303 жыл бұрын
Its a game not real life so its was good at its time
@r0yal_0perat0r3 жыл бұрын
@@tizanikandothers yes
@CheeseSlayer2943 жыл бұрын
Just like the B-17 flying tissue paper
@101BULLET3 жыл бұрын
If the pe-8 gets a 5000kg bomb then the Lancasters should have their tall boy bombs and the bouncing bomb Edit: LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@DaMatchstick3 жыл бұрын
its a 5000kg, not lb
@tank72753 жыл бұрын
I get the tall boy but why bouncing bomb?
@101BULLET3 жыл бұрын
@@DaMatchstick thanks I didn't know that
@randomadditionz83163 жыл бұрын
Yeah tall boy should be added
@hoangho67813 жыл бұрын
Talllboys are a bit much it’s much MUCH more explody than the fab5000
@dundabird32033 жыл бұрын
The Sterling is the most ironically named plane in the game because it will remove all your wealth.
@richardpopielarz85263 жыл бұрын
The spelling is "Stirling," just as the city in northern England.
@bertiesaurus3 жыл бұрын
@@richardpopielarz8526 the city in Scotland you daft twat
@nodubstephere10083 жыл бұрын
@@richardpopielarz8526 *central Scotland
@richardpopielarz85263 жыл бұрын
@@bertiesaurus I realized my error, and was going to correct it, but something came up, you vertical smile....
@AmphiStuG3 жыл бұрын
@@richardpopielarz8526 Vertical smile... I'll have to use that. (Also the '...' is meant to be used as a pause between another sentence; It can't be used to end a sentence.
@carsandstickmanlover56953 жыл бұрын
I swear the 7.7mm does absolutely nothing, but the bomb load is something else 😳
@niume74683 жыл бұрын
Typhoon with 12 7.7mm is a beast
@that_one_guy_21223 жыл бұрын
Honestly, after the Halifax you might as well stop until you get the Canberra imo, but 8 7.7's in turrets aren't as bad as they seem, just use the right belts and know how to aim and they have a high chance to set fires as well, assuming you're not stock .... then its just suffering, but that's a lot of stock planes in warthunder.
@OGPatriot033 жыл бұрын
Use AP.
@infinityknight433 жыл бұрын
@Maxwell Joseph ye, but ig these ppl are just noobs and it's 7.62mm but okay
@J4ckmaestro3 жыл бұрын
@@OGPatriot03 why use AP when universal belts have AP-I, surely that's just better?
@theannihilator91673 жыл бұрын
Swordfish was famous for attacking italian boats. Bismarck: "Am i a joke to you??"
@whitewolf-xf9ui3 жыл бұрын
I know right?
@ravitejvarma37813 жыл бұрын
Exactly I just shook my head. Probably didn't mention it because the Bismarck isn't in game
@ArsenyPro3 жыл бұрын
Taranto attack was like Italian Pearl Harbour. There were much more damage than just a single German BB.
@theannihilator91673 жыл бұрын
@@ArsenyPro ok yes, could be. But i think that was not a mission that made the Swordfish so famous...!
@Riechstag3 жыл бұрын
@@theannihilator9167 i mean in terms of dates of the events happening the raid on the taronto port did happen first thus making that the event that attracted the swordfish's glory
@Ghost0fPakistan3 жыл бұрын
Imagine using the bouncing bomb in the 38th parallel map :v
@kh2b5733 жыл бұрын
Yea in the “challenge” section >:D
@TheMemeDynamics3 жыл бұрын
Imagine doing that during night, and with spotlights from the bomber's tail and nose
@tizanikandothers3 жыл бұрын
👌
@Shizuka9353 жыл бұрын
Drangon engine in 2030
@AE_productions073 жыл бұрын
Yo ur the same guy from squishyshibe new vid
@yogibearthebear67743 жыл бұрын
I find it funny how Gaijin recognises how strong the Wellington was in this video but in game it falls apart if slightly tickled by a 7.92
@patriotic-panda5 ай бұрын
mfw survivor bias
@localkiwi99884 ай бұрын
You must be American
@junyutan21723 жыл бұрын
Pls make new gamemodes for air rb so bombers dont just die immediately or space climb and be a pain In the ass for everyone
@pedrosabino87513 жыл бұрын
Would be nice a mode which the spawn is infinite and you have to destroy all the enemy factories first to win
@abroamg3 жыл бұрын
@@pedrosabino8751 this 👍
@martinortegacano82293 жыл бұрын
@Pedro Sabino eres un genio
@josebucio86973 жыл бұрын
Gajin isn't ready for that, Is like putting a bomber on an arcade. We all know how it'd end
@C76Caravan3 жыл бұрын
Hopefully, many of them (e.g. Blenheim is still the War Thunder predecessor Birds of Steel model so over 10 years old by now) will get at least the polygon increase and updated textures that the B-17 & G4M got this update, though much nicer would be an actual full remodel update (even B-17 still has some geometry errors, despite the polygon increase).
@dragoontype00alphaz193 жыл бұрын
I'm still waiting for G4M with more powerful engines and G3 turn up
@M4_Sherman5873 жыл бұрын
the b-17 model is still fucked. you die after getting hit by 1 20mm in the tail
@piscessoedroen3 жыл бұрын
@@M4_Sherman587 because it's only plane model rework, not damage model rework
@leponpon69353 жыл бұрын
Stock lone bomber...casually getting shot out of the sky shortly after spawning..."they don't ever die"...yeah right...but a PvE assault mode for bombers would make 'em so much more grindable in wartinder.
@markc29643 жыл бұрын
As a Interceptor main I feel bad for wiping bombers but what else am I supposed to do? I also run rockets on the 109 just for wellington kills. In addition to the PVE I think they need to make aiming the gunners easier.
@leponpon69353 жыл бұрын
Not sure though because bombers already have excellent autogunners
@flamepanzer17673 жыл бұрын
@@leponpon6935 not rly lmao. Some ppl just have dogshit flight skills. You're much better off aiming yourself
@leponpon69353 жыл бұрын
lmao gun barrel aiming back at gunner seppukku style, imagine that, then you shoot yourself down with double - quadruple repair costs, while trying to outfly the fighters in underpowered sitting duck. If that bomber succeeds, he must have some serious flight skills
@dominatorandwhocaresanyway96173 жыл бұрын
@@leponpon6935 backgunners that start shooting at planes 200m away. You are dead when a plane gets 800m away
@hoangho67813 жыл бұрын
Fun fact the Stirling is the only bomber in Britain in ww2 that actually is a four-engine bomber design The Halifax and the Lancaster are based on enlarged twin engine designs
@ethans36723 жыл бұрын
Wow I actually had no idea, would have thought the Halifax was designed to be 4 engined. I have a soft spot for the Stirling because my relative flew the first ones in 7 squadron and did testing in 1940. It’s a pity it was not a very safe plane…
@friedyzostas99983 жыл бұрын
What do we think about british bombers? They are verry fragile in the game and do not justify the repair cost.
@eldritchgod43083 жыл бұрын
can be said about any bomber, but yeah. also .303 brownings are literally loaded with frozen peas and I refuse to believe otherwise.
@jtoddjb3 жыл бұрын
not many vehicles in war thunder today justify the repair costs. I have some favorites that I just don't play anymore because of it
@friedyzostas99983 жыл бұрын
@@eldritchgod4308 Nah nah nah, Pe-8 and certain german bombers are extremely tanky in comparison and work as literaly gunships
@threetwenty20873 жыл бұрын
@@friedyzostas9998 me 264
@topace10383 жыл бұрын
@@friedyzostas9998 I take it you play a lot of Air Sim. Bombers are absolute beasts in that mode.
@mikejunior803 жыл бұрын
I would've loved to hear about the V-bombers and the program that created them.
@jakesiswick96913 жыл бұрын
They would be so different to the other jets in the game
@staszekr033 жыл бұрын
Not in the game
@lernaeanhydra57663 жыл бұрын
Stupid sexy Vulcan
@Cobrashadows3 жыл бұрын
@@staszekr03 Is it due to licence?
@staszekr033 жыл бұрын
@@Cobrashadows They just wouldn't work and be impossible to balance
@mikelli45443 жыл бұрын
Having played British bombers since 2014 I can say with complete confidence that British piston engine bombers are the worst, most painful experience Warthunder has to offer. From their lack of any useful offensive armament to the incredible opposition they face, it must be one of the least enjoyable things to do. Understandably, these planes were night bombers so from a realistic perspective it’s somewhat understandable, but seriously, the only thing the British bombers are good for is losing money
@HeathrowAviator2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, they get a LOT better after the Lincoln. The Aussies did a great job with that one!
@Screamer-ti7gg3 жыл бұрын
One British bomber I’d like to see added would be the avro Vulcan, but with what the GB tech tree looks like I think it is an unlikely addition but still a possible one. Still good British bombers already in the game so far, well done with the amazing work so far Gajin Entertainment. It is a truly amazing game, I’m struggling to find a game that is nearly half as good :)
@uisce_3 жыл бұрын
It could easily be a ground rb nuke plane, I don't think it's a good idea rtn for air rb
@markjackson76503 жыл бұрын
As much as I love the vulcan I'm afraid it couldn't be implemented properly in war thunder. It would be next to impossible to balance as its only defence is speed and altitude. So it would either sit at a br where nothing could catch it and it would be op or be at br where its speed means nothing and it would get annihilated by super sonic jets
@jielynsabarez26933 жыл бұрын
@@markjackson7650 maus syndrome
@Screamer-ti7gg3 жыл бұрын
@@markjackson7650 that is sadly true, which is quite annoying but is fair enough
@fury45393 жыл бұрын
@@markjackson7650 well if they added the infra red defence system on the T-90 for deflecting rockets the the V bombers, Tu 95 and B 52 an ld B 57 could get Electronic warfare.
@tachankathelord59963 жыл бұрын
I sent a clip called the bouncing tank to the thundershow wish me luck boys
@Betto_3333 жыл бұрын
gl
@llerenilotha59043 жыл бұрын
Hope u get some GE
@bewluga58863 жыл бұрын
Good luck comrade
@johnjohansen453 жыл бұрын
hope u get that mulah
@Its_Me_Romano3 жыл бұрын
Didn't ask
@boogiebomber21913 жыл бұрын
British bombers: Repair cost simulator
@redbaron86703 жыл бұрын
Sad thing is that bombers don’t have a place in Air RB… Except being SL and RP piñata for fighters
@pedrosabino87513 жыл бұрын
Would be better if after the repair the bombers air spawn again, instead of take off from the AF
@KomorníK23 жыл бұрын
Ever played me 264?
@obamagaminghvitskur2 жыл бұрын
The stirling mk i is a pain because of all the xp50s
@waffleman23702 жыл бұрын
My B-17G would like to disagree
@leopard_2A6-906 Жыл бұрын
@@obamagaminghvitskur the Halifax faces them too
@Floody4683 жыл бұрын
Only if we get the Vulcan Then others will run scarred
@peytonbrennan6143 жыл бұрын
Give me a Halifax with 20's and I could wreak havoc on enemy teams. Halifax bombload is absurdly good and I love the plane with a dying passion, too bad I do the dying part a lot.
@autisticsponge83113 жыл бұрын
Give me a Lancaster and it's basically the same. I'm actually really good at using the Lancaster and somehow not as good with any other bomber. But with the LB I'm actually able to do great damage on the enemies defence systems and if I'm outnumbered/outgunned I shall use the great Japanese technique known as kamikaze.
@Xiodot3 жыл бұрын
The bomber life
@eisenglitch_kv82633 жыл бұрын
ah yes, the curse of bri'ish bombers...
@leojennings24383 жыл бұрын
My grandfather served as an engineer on a SAR Shackleton in the 50s(?) With a large radar mounted under the chin. Apparently if the wing caught fire, he would have to have put on a harness and climbed onto the wing with a fire extinguisher
@MotorStorm3 жыл бұрын
So when will we get this "incredible resiliance" of the Wellington? A single 12.7 will rip its wing with the current DM
@hayyay13 жыл бұрын
Worst part is, they used to have the incredible resilience
@neroclaudius72843 жыл бұрын
Or chop it in half
@dussel69deboath613 жыл бұрын
aye before their 20mm cannon uppdate years ago the welli took abeating and kept going
@Memeo.3 жыл бұрын
I've waited for this for so long, WORTH THE WAIT!
@MrPokemonWT3 жыл бұрын
Yupp They are rather fun to play with
@LouisPlaysDrums2 жыл бұрын
British bombers are pain.
@phantomtherat64853 жыл бұрын
I would love to see the light bomber variant of the mosquito in the game, no armament or armour but so fast that it could outrun all german fighters apart from the fockewulf 190. Also I would like to see the Lancaster’s bombload increased to allow for their proper load or a tall boy/ grand slam bomb.
@autisticsponge83113 жыл бұрын
Just imagine if we used the mosquito or vampire. I'd say they'd be the best to use if used in large numbers.
@killerpotato68683 жыл бұрын
The mosquito needs to be redone in the game, a mosquito bomber with the correct bomb load and a faster mosquito possibly a mk30 with those amazing merlin 76 engines needes to be added.
@phantomtherat64853 жыл бұрын
Indeed
@jonqueller44443 жыл бұрын
We need the Mosquito interceptor
@lishiesteinsnightclub87703 жыл бұрын
The most important comment is, when will we get the V trio, the Vulcan in WT would be sweet
@starflyxxl86003 жыл бұрын
I just want the victor, it's my faveroute plane
@StuckOnAFireHydrant3 жыл бұрын
The br if British higher tier bombers should be lowered. If we are placing them based on bombload, with that logic the nc223 and f222 should both be 6.0
@decentanimations40652 жыл бұрын
Don’t give them ideas I want my nc223 too stay were it is.
@n1k1george2 жыл бұрын
I have had surprising success with the Halifax in AB in sowing mayhem among armor columns and wiping out bases. Defensive fire is weak but slow down and jink like mad until the enemy fighters are really close then, the .303s can actually do some damage to fighters.. I've come to really love this plane.
@ralphhalliwellwright76523 жыл бұрын
AKA ABSOLUTE TEA DRINKING MEGACHADS
@schaab72033 жыл бұрын
Gaijin: makes great video about bombers Bombers in game: die after getting one bullet penetrated
@Friedrich312Samsa3 жыл бұрын
Perfect time to remember Gaijin the existance of the Blackburn Skua.
@captainramius5047 Жыл бұрын
I think that there was a Lancaster squadron which recognised the severe lack of decent offensive armaments, so pooled the squadrons money and bought 50.cals for their lancasters. I’ll have to check my sources but I think it was done
@giogio_lollovesolivetaggia75423 жыл бұрын
I love his “Taranto” pronunciation
@Ben_Kimber3 жыл бұрын
When I was grinding through early to mid British aircraft years ago, I always thought of the bombers as paper airplanes with bb guns. I always got set on fire quickly, and couldn't do any meaningful damage with the defensive armament. I stopped playing with bombers at the first Stirling because I wasn't making it to the bomb targets anymore...ever. I was shot down before I could get there every time.
@themistaken95713 жыл бұрын
Cool vid and all, now how about giving them the correct bombloads?
@CrystalMethEnjoyer3 жыл бұрын
Imagine playing literally any ground RB with realistic bombloads and bomb operation
@roryn7463 жыл бұрын
@@CrystalMethEnjoyer you gotta admit though, the game is so much more fun when strategic bombers come in and just carpet bomb an area, destroying everything and everyone. Plus it would allow for a more dynamic gameplay experience if air supremacy fighters were no longer the main cas option in ground rb
@CrystalMethEnjoyer3 жыл бұрын
@@roryn746 no
@eldritchgod43083 жыл бұрын
@@roryn746 While yes, I do find it enjoyable to level entire cities, some players would like to keep their frames above 2 fps.
@Lemonificent3 жыл бұрын
I want my Cookie Mosquito.
@jimmyalcantara76233 жыл бұрын
I played British for a long time, But where are the Tallboy and Grand Slam Bombs?!!
@dominatorandwhocaresanyway96173 жыл бұрын
Ikr? Tallboy has like 70%ish the power of fab 5000. Grandslam would be kinda op tho
@jimmyalcantara76233 жыл бұрын
@@dominatorandwhocaresanyway9617 Imagine an Earthquake during a match lol
@aarongerard72773 жыл бұрын
The Lancaster is one of my favorite planes. I actually live less than an hour away from the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum where one of the last two Lancasters capable of flying resides. On days with good weather, you can often see and hear it flying over!
@russellmiles28613 жыл бұрын
Fantastic bomb load but I find it un-survivable against fighters at its rank. The Halifax can achieve much more.
@whitewolf-xf9ui3 жыл бұрын
Did you actually know they got a third one working in Australia the government just doesn't want to fly it I don't know why
@SRC23873 жыл бұрын
The ultimate low level strategic bomber to me. I keep it under 250m and take off from the airfield and keep an eye on when the opposing bombers pop up. Fly towards them, or perpendicular and bam- surprise run on the bases. Works 4/10 times.
@nomisekul49693 жыл бұрын
I've seen that one fly with the last other Lancaster at the Eastbourne airshow, beautiful warbirds and so majestic. I wish bombers were better represented in war thunder so that they actually have more use
@oz62263 жыл бұрын
I really like the history of British bombers, how their designs changed throughout time and were upgraded, thanks for making this video War Thunder!
@theconfederacyofindependen72682 жыл бұрын
A star wars Starfighter that had the same story the Blenheim had. The Amcon Corporation T-65 "X-wing" or simply named "X-wing". After the E-wing was introduced and replaced the X-wing. Some Squadrons relied on upgrading their X-wings
@kaletovhangar3 жыл бұрын
Whitley was actually one of three medium bombers in RAF service at war's start,but we still haven't seen it in the game.
@thomasluthi-bhatti11403 жыл бұрын
Yeah theirs is not what the "original trio" was. They just conveniently forgot about the Whitley.
@kiwipinos3 ай бұрын
My Grandfather from New Zealand flew 64 ops two complete tours in Short Stirling 622 Main force & Lancasters in 7th Pathfinder squadron, they were an elite crew master deputy bomber on 15 of their ops. The pilot went on living till 96 & was a pilot on many aircraft including 747s for Qantas.
@justified_wrath_213 жыл бұрын
Can you guys make it less hard to get to the next teir. Maybe we can not have a set amount of planes/tanks we need for the next teir, we can just go through the line.
@rokasb94413 жыл бұрын
Yeah, in british tech tree, to get a phantom or lightning you need planes in 3 lines now!
@matiasleivacirici72153 жыл бұрын
@@rokasb9441 yes! So annoying!!! I lost all motivation...😑
@rokasb94413 жыл бұрын
@@matiasleivacirici7215 true, i had managed to pick up phantom earlier, but my friend in german tech tree was locked out of his mig21mf with 80k rp left..
@miles83073 жыл бұрын
no because they make less money that way
@ethanbell78703 жыл бұрын
Hi War Thunder, one of the most important WW2bombers was probably the Mosquito. It was fast, nimble, and had quite a decent bomb load. I don’t understand why it wasn’t in this video, I’d assume because you guys categorize it as a fighter. But it originally started it’s life as a bomber and then became a fighter
@DarthKanye3 жыл бұрын
i love that it’s a video game channel, but it also gives depth information about history
@nathanielgrim73883 жыл бұрын
Y’all should add the V force bombers, it’s perfect.
@mrburnsthesexmachine24683 жыл бұрын
No
@asta59073 жыл бұрын
@@mrburnsthesexmachine2468 yes
@mrburnsthesexmachine24683 жыл бұрын
@@asta5907 have fun being dead at all times
@uisce_3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@aslamnurfikri76403 жыл бұрын
And Falklands map so you can recreate Operation Black Buck
@polakrodak85383 жыл бұрын
5:32 "the avro Manchester" Gajin what are you planning? You don't usually mention tanks planes and ships outside of your game and don't add them
@SeaSwordForce3 жыл бұрын
He's explaining the history of the aircraft?....
@jacobbeckley52923 жыл бұрын
I was surprised that the Fairey battle bomber isn't in the game Yet. But so far I love the Halifax heavy bomber it's Pretty good at climbing to the sweet spot ( Which is around 20,000ft) real easy.
@House_of_Schmidt3 жыл бұрын
Air RB Enduring Confrontation would make top tier bombers actually viable...
@thecolor66723 жыл бұрын
are you going to add the manchester? or maybe the vulcan?
@blueshark73853 жыл бұрын
There are a lot of bombers that are better than the Avro Manchester for Gaijin to add. Blackburn Skua Vickers Wellesley Fairey Barracuda Fairey Battle Armstrong Whitworth Whitley Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle Early variants of the Bristol Blenheim and bomber variants of the De Havilland Mosquito
@blueshark73853 жыл бұрын
@Vlad Melis No Not at all
@blueshark73853 жыл бұрын
@Vlad Melis None of the aircraft I presented there would be suited a br anywhere near the Do 335. The Skua, Battle and Barracuda are single engined naval light dive/fighter bombers, with the Battle and Barracuda being mass produced aircraft, and the Skua achieved the first air victory of the Second World War when a group of them attacked and shot down a Do 18 (another plane that would be nice to see in game)
@blueshark73853 жыл бұрын
@Vlad Melis Really? I believe that a Ki-10 would find it quite challenging to shoot down a B-17, or even a Wellington or Do 17. I don't quite think you get what I'm saying at all. Something like the Skua or Wellesley would be at 1.3 or 1.7, like where the other similar performing light bombers and dive bombers are. I never said anything about War Thunder being close to real life.
@DblIre3 жыл бұрын
I remember when Kermit Weeks brought his Sotherland to Oshkosh. It was moored in Lake Winnebago until he finished the facilities for it at Fantasy of Flight
@hi_-bz7wf3 жыл бұрын
Why is the Wellington a shot trap in game? Any shot that comes within 10m of the aircraft get directed into the pilot.
@Archibald17053 жыл бұрын
2:09 I used to call it the flying church because of its windows
@Silverraptorvideos3 жыл бұрын
3:18 You sure it was most famous for its use against the Italian Navy? Its role in sinking the Bismarck did have something to add to its reputation?
@liluzivert32373 жыл бұрын
@@Jeb724 Germany’s most powerful ship*
@pedrosabino87513 жыл бұрын
@@Jeb724 The Tarento attack inspired the japanese attack of pearl harbour. Also a nice addition to the swordfish curriculum
@brendan58253 жыл бұрын
More naval enduring conflicts please.
@lolbitgamingii49122 жыл бұрын
2:27 fun fact. In ww2, the british set a world record by building a Wellington in under 1 day, and they had made it from scratch
@captainkarrian78923 жыл бұрын
My grandfather's best friend whom i was named after, was a radio operator on a Lancaster in the war, it's a beautiful aircraft
@oldschoolamerican7483 жыл бұрын
Fantastic description of the Bombers that served with superb results for the UK. Great video.
@shadowdome1023 жыл бұрын
Day 8 Greeting fellow war thunderian I am here to introduce a proposition in the wonderful game we play. The era is the mid-late cold war. The new addition of aircraft leads to the conclusion of the 1970’s so it makes it appropriate to update and add this new aircraft to the tech tree. I am speaking of the bombers, the American plane designed for world war 2 but due to the wartime effort, it was introduced to the early cold war. The name of this aircraft is commonly known as the B-36 Peacemaker, Magnesium overcast, and the plane that never dropped a bomb in anger along with a funny joke told by the men who’ve flown and worked with her during its service, six turning, four burning" into two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking and two more unaccounted for. The reason for this slogan was due to the massive unit of a plane this was, it was powered by 6 engines designated the P&W R-4360 Wasp Major and 4 J47-GE-19 Jet engines modified to run on a select fuel that the plane was carrying with later modifications and iterations of the engines the last variant produced were able to achieve 395 mph(409 at combat speed, in war thunder this is known as WEP), at its optimum altitude it would be 410 mph at 36,400 feet and its cruising speed being 227 mph at 5000ft this would change along with the flight as you would below to avoid radar and then climb to a higher altitude to avoid confrontation with the enemy speaking of the armament. The Peacemaker could be view as big and slow to some but it can protect itself with 16 20mm type M24A1 guns, 2 of these cannons in turrets there are 8 turrets throughout the aircraft the nose, tail (the tail is the first in American bombers to have a radar-based defense with a AN/APG-41A gun-laying radar), uppermost and rear top fuselage, and lastly the rearmost bottom turrets. These defenses could be stowed within the aircraft while in flight to reduce drag, at any point in time you could have up to 2 turrets which is four deadly fast firing cannons trained on your aircraft, the fire rate and the type of ammunition being a API and an HEI shell the gunners can make quick work of any unwanted foe. There was a featherweight program to reduce the weight of the aircraft. This allowed an increased speed and rage but not without its drawbacks. 'featherweighting' mods. (I) was the removal of all defensive guns except the tail gun, and (II) was the removal of the bunks, stove, and fire suppression system. For nerd reasons, both mods together were (III). This was implicated late in its service life as the rise of jets with higher altitude hindered the advantage of the aircraft in its high altitude at the time it was built and meant for. She was designed for WW2 if Britain was ever lost the Americans would need a way to bomb Germany and come back home. With a range up to 8221 miles and a radius of 10,650 miles along with a maximum bomb capacity of 86,000 pounds, the Peacemaker could start and end a war in a fell swoop. From its development in 1946 to its beginning trials in 1948 and its service from 1949 to 1959 she was the backbone of the United States Airforce which was starting out but made a name for itself. Below are the following specifications for the last variant to be produced with/without modifications B-36J and B-36J-III Crew: 15 Power Plant: (6) P&W R-4360-53 Wasp Major radial engines and (4) J47-GE-19 Jet Engines Armament: (8) 20mm gun turrets, 6 are retractable and 1 guided with radar Payload: up to 86,000 pounds of bombs and nuclear-capable Combat speed/combat altitude: 368mph/39,700 feet Max speed/altitude: 428mph/38,500 feet Stall speed: 130mph (120mph when on minimum fuel and max payload) WEP is possible, at sea level the time is 5 minutes(turbo critical), and at 35,000 for 30 minutes to continue depending on power levels and engine health. WITH MODIFICATIONS: (Removal of all turret except the tail turret, self-sealing pads, fuel purging system, & crew comfort items; the replacement of blisters by small flush windows) Crew: 13 Power Plant: (6) P&W R-4360-53 Wasp Major radial engines and (4) J47-GE-19 Jet Engines Armament: (1) 20mm gun turret (TAIL TURRET/ Radar based) Payload: Combat speed/combat altitude: 428mph/43,700 feet Max speed/altitude: 431mph/38,000feet (max speed at optimum height) Stall speed: 128 mph Source: AIR MANUALS VOLUME 36 - Consolidated Vultee(Convair) B-36 Peacemaker in depth
@gtee31223 жыл бұрын
Whenever I get bored of war thunder, this guy makes me wanna play it💜
@andrewyonemura62693 жыл бұрын
We all almost love you war thunder
@jakesiswick96913 жыл бұрын
Could u add the V bombers from the 50s in aka the Vulcan Victor and valiant cos they would be jet bombers unlike anything else in the game
@aslamnurfikri76403 жыл бұрын
Wellington Straight at Silverstone Circuit is named after Vickers Wellington. There's also Hangar Straight there
@troutwarrior67353 жыл бұрын
"Made famous for its attack on Italian boats" Cries in Bismarck
@friedyzostas99983 жыл бұрын
They don't want to upset half of their clients at once. Gaijoobles knows its sigma grindset.
@athiftsabit12082 жыл бұрын
This historical series like brand and nation specific history, etc should be listed in the playlist
@RubyFox_YT3 жыл бұрын
My CAP Commander's grandfather was a Landcaster pilot
@chronosg.azraelle76643 жыл бұрын
love the Canberra, I believe there are 2-3 of them down at Cotswold Airfield (Kemble) along with the Few Hawker Hunters The Owner Has (and by the looks of things 2 F-4s there as well now)
@hooparom74303 жыл бұрын
i love 30 cals at 5.0
@LeonelEBD3 жыл бұрын
The script on this one was on point. Congrats to the wt team resp. For the vids
@ryanmitchell56143 жыл бұрын
I still have no idea what the Stirling is doing a tier higher than the Halifax despite the Halifax being objectively superior
@paspax3 жыл бұрын
Blenheim Mk II is shown in the video. The original Blenheim was conceived as a heavy fighter and was repurposed because of its inadequate performance in that role.
@kochkaeskobold5483 жыл бұрын
New war breaks out Warthunder:HUGE Update coming up
@JoeSmith-zv4ic3 жыл бұрын
Wellington.... ' very resilient' Gaijin have you played war thunder?
@Fatduck-nm3jj3 жыл бұрын
You talked about the swordfish but didn’t mention it helping to sink bismark
@skfgv3 жыл бұрын
And i hate being put on domination matches all the time when i got like 2-3 bombers in my line up but when i use fighters and all im placed on maps with bases. It makes no sense to me
@TheZdrack3 жыл бұрын
Gaijin using the word resilient when describing bombers... man that's hilarious
@SeductiveWalrus3 жыл бұрын
Pls lower lincoln and shacleton repair cost
@Merluso4153 жыл бұрын
and b 29 ?
@SeductiveWalrus3 жыл бұрын
@@Merluso415 oh yea its 50k repair cost i dont play the us tech tree i just noticed
@RCT3Crashes1002 жыл бұрын
UK bombers in real life: Sturdy, if somewhat vulnerable planes, escorted by fighters to the target where they rain hell down from the sky. UK bombers in War Thunder: Apparently made of tissue paper and get popped from halfway across the map by a single burst of fire. Good luck trying to find anyone who’ll protect you on the way to the targets!
@TheBuccaneer19753 жыл бұрын
Really nice content and gorgeous attention to detail - but I'd LOVE to see the release of the Valiant, Victor and Vulcan.
@boeingbetty24jettonlousie853 жыл бұрын
The Wellington bomber only two compared to the B-17's four and five than ten but the Wellington has a sturdy fuelsalauge which means that it can withstand some of the most nasty punishments unlike the B-17 which has thin metal skin which means the B-17 can't withstand so much damage without blowing up despite that problem the B-17 has a powerful Pratt & Whitney R-1690 Hornet Radial Engine which the B-17 has four of them (two on each wing) this engine can put out a tree sweeping 750 horsepower which means the B-17 is nicknamed "the flying fortress" cause it has no chance of giving up and blow up unlike the Wellington which has two (one on each wing) the Wellington has three turrets unlike the B-17 which has a new Ball Turret and waist guns and a choice on Weither or not to get a chin turret the B-17 has five when you compare the G model B-17 unlike the J model B-24 which has a retractable ball turret
@person___93 жыл бұрын
i think the hampden is my favorite british bomber. its like your generic bomber, like the b-25, do 17, pe-2, etc.
@bajtars8223 жыл бұрын
But if gayjin hates bombers, why are they doing these videos? Ohhh only the money matters.
@rainysunday96643 жыл бұрын
My Wellington Expierience: Pilot dies from literally anything
@overworlder3 жыл бұрын
The Lincoln stuff was interesting. Also Canberra’s pronounced KAN-brə or KAN-bə-rə, at least in Australia.
@theoriginal13coloniesusa112 жыл бұрын
Hidden pieces of History of the Fairey Swordfish and the Lancaster. The Swordfish severely damaged damaged the KMS Bismarck's steering system and the Lancaster actually and literally nuked a battleship with the Tallboy. The Tirpitz sank after literally being nuked by the Lancaster
@owenmcgrath36963 жыл бұрын
Aerican players laugh when they see my defensive turrets, But then get slapped when they see some of the biggest bomb loads in game.
@flukedogwalker30163 жыл бұрын
Didn't mention the Mossie but it was a light bomber which could do just about anything and the Tsetse was the best.
@pearofgeeksii8156 Жыл бұрын
You said there were three British bombers at the onset of war, but you missed the night/heavy bomer the Armstrong Whitworth Whitley. Also the Swordfish whilst still in service in Fleet Command in 1939 was in the process of being replaced by the Blackburn Skua; although it and its sister plane the Roc were withdrawn from active service after the Norwegian campaign, making the Fairey Swordfish one of the few planes to outlast its replacement in active service. Then of couse, you did a whole video on British bombers and never mentioned the de Haviland Mosquito; which in itself should be cause for handing in your bow tie at the front desk as you leave the history department; but you covered the Fleet Air Arm without mentioning the Fairey Barracuda! Saccrilege!
@YoYo510142 жыл бұрын
Great video my favourite and it is perfection
@Green_star_line3 жыл бұрын
I never knew how large the Wellington was the size comparison surprised me
@Ash007YT3 жыл бұрын
Imagine using a bomber in 2021.
@lechendary3 жыл бұрын
imagine
@uisce_3 жыл бұрын
Just give us RB ec already
@ccv19293 жыл бұрын
Imagine being one shooted by 50 cals Wait, it happens always!
@Deuce_and_a_half2 жыл бұрын
Please make a separate gamemode for heavy bombers. So our bases don't get stolen by Strike aircraft, and we don't fall apart by the first burst of machine gun fire from an enemy who sneezes in our direction.
@HarpicDelicious3 жыл бұрын
Hey uh gaijin i would like to seek a help..When I opened the game i cant move either the planes and its says "Warning! Your buttons are not assigned". What should I do because I do not know how to reset the settings and further more, I cant press the W and S and the plane it wont move..Can you help me or someone. i would appreciate it.
@kjelliboy3 жыл бұрын
I am missing just one small very important bomber for the British, the Vulcan
@Honey.1.13 жыл бұрын
Quite early, actually, I am more of a World of Tanks player, but I do really like watching your videos! Keep up the good work!
@mandolinic Жыл бұрын
I think you missed out the three V-bombers: the Valiant, the Victor, and the mighty Vulcan.
@lorddaemon123 жыл бұрын
Me: so any Re-new modeling in the cockpit of bombers??? Gaijin: sorry we will not implement any new features for the bomber cockpit because that is not our first priority
@kingquokka19343 жыл бұрын
Is the Lincoln with the Aussie upgrades in game? Of course the extra armament is better, but STRAYA! enough said.
@SoymeScaleModels3 жыл бұрын
The Shack was in service until 1991 with the RAF, not 84.
@douglasparkinson41233 жыл бұрын
the first plan for dambusters raid was to use torpedo bombers, but it was scrapped because of torpedo nets.
@sebastianstyhre88093 жыл бұрын
Does anyone have any tips on how to switch from ab to rb in tanks?
@Ghost0fPakistan3 жыл бұрын
when you load into the hangar there will be a tab below the start button , press it then you will get a few match options in including the ground rb one. I also had a similar confusion when i started war thunder so i feel you
@turklander693 жыл бұрын
first will be pain
@AnglishWyvern3 жыл бұрын
Practise
@johnjohansen453 жыл бұрын
@@turklander69 wrong, much pain
@turklander693 жыл бұрын
@@johnjohansen45 ive been playing ground RB for a year now it’s still pain send help
@joshuadavies77263 жыл бұрын
my mates granddad flew a lancaster and was invited to join the dam busters but said no im going to go home and have kids now