British Couple Reacts to What If the US Invades Russia (Day by Day)

[@timothyreel716]

The main purpose in having nukes, is to discourage someone else from using their nukes, it's an equalizer.

[@rodttu]

mutual assured destruction

[@christianoliver3572]

@@rodttu Hey it's the 80s all over again!! I never thought I'd have to live through this crap again.

[@ViolentKisses87]

Without nukes WWIII would have already happened. It still would be many times worse than WWII but with lower initial stakes major powers like Russia, US , and China would be very likely to have fought long and vicious wars by now. Thank nukes for keeping wars in the realm of proxy wars like Ukraine.

[@PresentingGreatMusic]

Yup, I think of it like owning a gun. 99.9% of rational people never want to use it but just the fact of having one keeps you safe. Nukes are the country equivalent.

[@zclaudteoriasdbs7964]

@@christianoliver3572 how old are you?

[@danbarry4772]

It wouldn't take a week to throw Russia out of Ukraine. I used to think they would be a tough fight. But they have shown themselves to be an ineffectual fighting force.

[@krovostock9102]

Funny. The US did such a good job in Afghanistan… lol

[@ishrendon6435]

The US couldnt beat the viet cong and NVA into submission or the taliban into submission. I think you might reconsider how powerful or capable the US miltary is. Theyre not gods theyre humans with skills and technological superiority. Theyre beatable and can be pushed back. I wouldnt overestimate the power of the US military. When i say this as an american people get offended and start crying but its just reality anyone who has ever been to war knows war isnt simple or easy. Its prettyuch rolling a dice. How a war ends or the results is really unknown who wins a war??? It can years to find out . War is not a fun or easy enterprise anyone who thinks war is easy and that your army can do mighty things and is unstoppable is bound to run into a vietnam or Afghanistan. Its just not the way warfare works. As a former soldier in the US army i can tell you war is complex, more than these war hungry people imagine. Oh amd iraq was another failure of a war and mess. Never ever underestimate your opponent and the will of the people of these countries many will fight to the death and we shouldnt underestimate the people who will never allow conquest to be possible. The russians are finding out that conquering uktaine isnt easy, the US found out iraq and Afghanistan and vietnam had alot more fierce warriors than we imagined and the resistance was great too great we had to withdrawl and face failure

[@lISiilenc3lI]

@@krovostock9102 ok bot y’all mad af bc u guys sucks

[@openmindz7689]

I'm an American. All imma say is were being lied to. The corrupt and corrupt media isn't telling us the truth.

[@mikejacobs7168]

@@ishrendon6435 the Vietnam war was mostly fought in Jungles the Modern warfare arena in Russia won’t be Jungles their for America will have superiority in the Air Land and sea plus 1975 American hardware and Technology is NO match for 2022 America just face it America will Defeat Russia in a week plus adding the Fact that Russia can’t defeat a smaller opponent such as Ukraine is a fact that Russia can’t defend its self from America also many Russians don’t want to die for the Putin Region.

[@chrisjohnson1599]

The point of nukes are to prevent others from using them. However, the problem is that more smaller countries with dictators who aren't afraid of mutual annihilation are being given the secrets to build the nuclear weapons and are far more likely to use them.

[@jonadabtheunsightly]

Honestly, the nuclear state that worries me most is Pakistan, not because I think the government would use the nukes (other than as a deterrent), but because I can easily imagine their security being bad enough that some rogue group (e.g., the Taliban) could potentially get ahold of a warhead or two. Back in the sixties and seventies, *several* nuclear powers had dangerously lax security around their nuclear weapons; fortunately most have now taken measures that improve this situation dramatically. For example, the launch codes are no longer set to all zeroes (to ensure that the missiles can definitely be launched in an emergency such as nuclear war, a perfect example of why paranoia needs to be filtered through logic, because eep, what a tremendously bad idea that was).

[@colindavidch]

@@jonadabtheunsightly exactly the U.S, China, Russia etc it’s really just a scare tactic but if some country that has a dictator with zero accountability has one and is unhinged that’s what’s scary.

[@ishrendon6435]

So the US is a dictatorship?? Last i checked the U sis the only nation that has dropped a nuclear weapon. Now youre just speculating that a small nation with a dictator has any desire to actually use a nuke when in reality its more likely and probable it would be a democratic society with a huge amd powerful army like in asia or Europe or the US(it has dropped nukes lets not pretend it didnt thus violating the international law)point is your type of government dictator or demcoracy is irrelavent when you look at the behavior of democracies and dictatorships in terms of invasions and war , democracies are more violent!!! All the literature on this is clear

[@sirbiff10]

This quote pretty much summarizes American military. “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.” So be nice to the giant.

[@amandasargent2767]

They really, REALLY should have listened to that guy. It makes you wonder that if they didn't attack Pearl Harbor, what would have drawn the US into the war. I can't imagine us never joining but what about the Manhattan Project? Would it have even happened? I assume at some point someone would have developed nuclear capabilities, but there's probably a good chance most of us would have never even heard of Hiroshima & Nagasaki. There was also that other Japanese military guy who said something about how you could never invade the US mainland because there'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass." Both of them seemed to have been pretty spot on.

[@ronaldklaus2983]

The poor moral of Russians invading Ukraine is one thing but I think that guy extremely overestimates their will to fight if we invaded them

[@liquidacid1983]

Well the entire moral issue with Russian troops in Ukraine is because Putin decided to use a lot of conscripts. They not only don't want to be their but having to work with them lowers the moral of the actual professionals. I still don't get why he bothered to use them since it's not like Russia doesn't have enough regular enlisted. If they were defending their homes tho it would be a completely different story.

[@kevinwallis2194]

RIssia couldnt even take over Ukrane with us giving them supplies, om pretty sure Russia wouldnt really be a problem.

[@daleowen2606]

I heard your new PM denounced the special relationship with the USA but I highly doubt the rest of the UK government would let that happen. It would only hurt both sides

[@Jamie_D]

When/where did this happen?

[@daleowen2606]

@@Jamie_D I'm not sure but she was asked about it in a 60 minute interview

[@papamaniac2410]

She did not denounce it. She spoke cautiously about it. I do not blame her. If we elect another Trump Train Wreck, I would not trust us either. The way Trump treated our allies was really not good. He wanted to cut military spending without understanding why we spend and do like we do. I know there is waste and pork in the military budget, but lets see where we can really save and not just cut it just to save money. Those special interests will keep their programs and we will end up cutting important things. One thing is for sure, all the bases we have around the world are costing us but how much more would we lose without them?

[@csw3287]

Your PM Wants to Unfriend Us? WoW.. Huh.. OK, Well Good Luck with the Aftermath of that decision...

[@daleowen2606]

@@csw3287 I don't think unfriend us. But be more of a standard ally like other European nations

[@AwxCO1]

so the moral of the story is...... nuclear war. ok, got it

[@ryanbruner4633]

I wouldn’t go invade Russia. It never went well for any country who tried it in the past.

[@NarwahlGaming]

And never go up against a Sicilian when _DEATH_ is on the line!

[@tonymorris4335]

Milly, the nuclear thing is a tough issue. If nuclear weapons didn't exist, it's absolutely certain that the US and USSR would have had a brutal, bloody, millions of dead people conventional war. Without the threat of annihilation the world would already have had WW3. Nuclear weapons, while shit, have also lead to incredible levels of peace that the world had never known before.

[@Le-0N91]

Американцы кого-нибудь побеждали ?Вьетнам нет,а Россия била объединенную Европу в лице Гитлера!

[@ThatShyGuyMatt]

I highly doubt an invasion would be what we do at this point at least. With nuclear war being considered legit this time around, it's far more worrisome. Also I respect you guys won't talk about the issue.

[@mikeneely3213]

I've been watching y'all since you were at121k. Y'all are very good at picking your video's. And I love your reactions to the USA. When it comes to nukes remember just because the government wants it there are still people behind the buttons and they may not to push it. Y'all keep up the good work!

[@FUBAR1986]

They’ve actually done live fire drills, well live fire in that people at the button thought it was real and a lot didn’t respond you’re right

[@timothyreel716]

The guy in the video said B-51 bombers, it's B-52 bombers!

[@audisnewbeginning8616]

My Dad has a coffee table made out of un upside down gunners window. It's has a 5 foot-ish radius. Sits on a circular steel ring as a a base then it has soil and a plant terrarium with a gap for air flow and a glass top. It's pretty awesom, my kids love it, and it's a great conversation piece.

[@audisnewbeginning8616]

Maybe he meant the Martin XB- 51? 🤔

[@timothyreel716]

@@audisnewbeginning8616 I double it, I've heard people say F-15 Tomcat before!

[@JerseyMikeP]

The USA could take over Russia, Simply because of how many base in near by countries and the 20 aircraft carriers they have. 11 of which carry 70 airplanes each. Thats not including the nuclear subs or 90+ destroys that can launch nuclear weapons. Within 5 minutes they could be showering Russia with 500+ missiles.

[@darrinleroy4869]

The United State Auto industry will make up the difference like in WWII.. they can still make tanks and equipment

[@whysoserious7280]

I know you guys have done hurricanes. We are currently being hit by one now. Should check some of the videos of it. Hurricane Ian.

[@smileyr]

I just want to point out that invading Russia is very very likely. A small mistake on Russias part could trigger a invasion. A missile landing on a nato ally territory will cause this invasion to happen. The US is technically in a staging phase right now with a lot of troops being sent to Poland Estonia.

[@Le-0N91]

Смешно!Американцы готовы подыхать за какую-то Эстонию или Литву?они хоть знают об этих странах?)))

[@stevenlauriano1286]

You guys have a great channel! You should do some movie reaction videos and music reaction videos. Especially from movies and music from before your time (70's and 80's). When I was your age, I was always interested in learning more about the stuff that came before me.

[@tHEdANKcRUSADER]

Russia has no military satellites enough said, GPS is American, they don’t have an equivalent that’s even comparable, Russia has proven they are not even the second best military in Ukraine

[@Т34-й2я]

Это расказуют те кто с ПОЗОРОМ бежал из Афганистана, от мужиков в Шлепанцах🤔🤭😁🤣

[@amandasargent2767]

I mean, they say the US is suffering it's worst losses since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but like, that was the last actual war we've been in, isn't it? I mean, yeah our troops are in Somalia and you know, wherever else but that just doesn't seem to be saying much.

[@timlois]

Regarding you opinion of the usefulness of nuclear weapons. One school of thought might say that the existence of these weapons prevented additional world wars in the 20th century between major powers which may have killed 100s of millions of people.

[@jonadabtheunsightly]

Speaking purely in terms of internal American domestic politics, launching a full-scale invasion of a major power like Russia is absolutely impossible. Even *joking* about something like that could terminate a political career. Providing weapons and information to a country that's being invaded *by* Russia, is one thing. Actually committing troops to assist the invaded country in such a conflict, would be a much harder sell. Being the invader ourselves, is right out. You might as well speculate about what if America nationalizes the retail industry. It's not something that could ever happen.

[@johnwatrous8982]

Russia has to fall internally. And when Russia falls China will fill the gap and ultimately will fall also.

[@williambranch4283]

Perhaps. If Russia falls, China will take all of Siberia ... as a precaution.

[@ishrendon6435]

Why do all you weirdos want countries to fall?? Are you a sadist?? Like iraq fell after US and Britain invasion. Hows that working out brining freedom amd democracy?? Its failed so shut up nerd

[@ishrendon6435]

I hope US and britain falls

[@gregorimansonov1152]

Estonia needs an Rammstein type airbase!!!

[@BlazinNSoul]

Personally I think Russia is doing this on purpose. They have 90% of their forces intact which haven't even been used yet. Most of their Airforce & almost none of their Navy. Never underestimate your enemy as my grandfather always used to say. :/

[@johnmurkwater1064]

I don't know about this guy's analysis... As I've been hearing that Russia is getting old T-62 tanks ready for combat again... That's a tank created in the 1950s.

[@stacyharris8725]

Did you hear that. Amnesty!! Who else would do that??

[@NarwahlGaming]

I heard that Great Leader Kim Jung Il created amnesty and granted it to the rest of the world but, they all refused and so arent worthy to join Best Korea.

[@damianpoquet3337]

Rusia never lose a war.. is yo big.. and is people fight

[@FuzzyMarineVet]

Don't worry about nukes on the US mainland. The High Frontier program, AKA Star Wars, wasn't all bluff, and most of the directed energy weapons and hyper velocity projectiles worked on by the military were first perfected for HF.

[@amandasargent2767]

So, I'm far from a military strategist but my dad was a pilot and super into the stuff and my ex husband was a paratrooper w the 82nd airborne so, I know a very little bit. And now, I'm glad that Russia didn't/couldn't do this but what is going on w/ Russia's military strategists that they *didn't* crater Ukrainian air fields? I mean, they may not have gained air superiority as quickly as the US during shock & awe (they aren't us, after all 😉) but still, that seems like a stunningly bad decision, doesn't it? That whole genius persona Putin built up isn't so convincing anymore.

[@tacobannana6628]

Hearing the UK pound and Euro currencies are nose diving and collapsing, please buy extra food guys (canned goods) and items you will need and maybe have a spare wood burning stove and a generator or something like that. I am hearing some crazy stuff and am getting ready here in Nebraska. I also am trying to contact my friends in warwickshire england, near coventry/nuneaton, and they don't listen and think i'm crazy. Just be careful and be safe. Thanks for all you do.

[@jdub8325]

Hope you guys are well! 🤟

[@Brandon-sw5ob]

Indeed I love how they say a tactical nuke what does that mean like no no no you you don't just affect that one small spot we all share the same air I mean goodness sake no it's terrible. Have a wonderful night guys

[@williambranch4283]

The Infographics video on the US attacking China is equally imaginary, and horrible to think of.

[@Badllamah]

Nukes... the only way to win is not to play (all credit the WOPR computer from Wargames)

[@MrTommygunz420]

17:40-among the younger generation...(this is the REAL reason why republicans always want to"protect the children" in the US BTW. And IDC what parliament OR King Sausagefingers ever says; I have no problems with the Beesley's either😉)

[@jamesigorreilly979]

Russian , Chinese and Arabs have a corner we all need to look at seriously

[@fbksfrank4]

No conscription in America, still volunteering.

[@williambranch4283]

Otherwise draft all the women and send them in first ;-)

[@lawabernathy9256]

Ukraine wouldnt have lasted 3 months if not for american money

[@williambranch4283]

So having allies is bad?

[@lawabernathy9256]

@@williambranch4283 i didnt say that. But it wasnt unprovoked. The stipuation in writing for the fall of the soviet union is that nato wouldnt move an inch east of what it occupied. Which at the time was through germany. I think that we shouldnt be helping ukraine for the fact that it will most likely end up being ww3. Which will ultimately be the destruction of the planet

[@cameronpalmer9307]

Did yall hear about the Russian and Chinese ships of the coast of Alaska?

[@dean7843]

What is sad is how much the US helped Russia in WWII

[@barryfletcher7136]

People at the time thought Nazi Germany was worse than the USSR. Ha!

[@johnhannah9163]

Maybe we should not have helped Russia as the way Putin is acting...threatening to nuke everyone

[@chrisbayliss3532]

They didnt really help Russia per say , they were part of the same cause ie rid the world of Nazi Germany and fascism , there were massive distrust from both parties behind the scenes .

[@williambranch4283]

I don't regret it, because it was necessary, not a matter of morality.

[@SMOOVKILL1]

What??? First it was soviet union not Russia then and the soviets lost more soldiers and civilians than every other nation combined. That's including the holocoust. I'm not a fan of war at all and I'm not "pro Russia" but U.S. came in when they had to and also dropped 2 nukes on Japan.

[@mindyourbusiness2954]

Great video I thought very accurate with every aspect as well

[@andrewchristopher7138]

Hi

[@DlcEnergy]

There wont be a time where we don't have nukes. Unless they became obsolete somehow. Do you imagine it'd be a wise idea if say the entire western world got rid of their nukes? Do you imagine the rest of the world would even believe we'd be so foolish? And assuming they did and we were, and we needed nukes to retaliate with, do you think we couldn't just produce more? We're a constantly evolving civilization constantly improving our technology. We invent tons of new technology on the spot when its necessary. As long as we remain as competent a civilization as we are now, we'll always have the capability to create and use such powerful weapons. And other civilizations out there are that capable too. So we have to be prepared for a fight if one comes our way. In a perfect world we wouldn't need the military at all, or even police. But it's not a perfect world.

[@Plastikdoom]

Ahaha, yes…only 28 tanks a month, of new, that’s released and public knowledge…we have over 5000 in storage. That are maintained, and upgraded as needed…so yeah…and all these numbers are just publicly released ones…so, safe bet we got far more, with many that fully modernized as full up replacements. Oh yeah, ‘only’ 28 fully modern M1A3’s a month…than can kill over 20:1 easily. Lol…so yeah, that’s not even counting air support, and our man portable anti armor weapons…plus you know, all the rest of NATO, lol.

[@markchambers5729]

If we attacked Russia, it might play out much as was depicted. I do think, other than surgical strikes against Russia's military bases, defenses and armament, we would not "cross" the border into Russia. I think we would also find a way to communicate to the Russian population that we have no intention of fighting inside Russia for two reasons. One, the loss of manpower on both sides would be tragic for both countries. Two, the US has no intent of fighting inside Russia thereby causing wholesale death among the populace (civilian casualties). Hopefully, this would demonstrate that NATO and the US in particular, are not out to destroy Russia as a nation. Pushing the Russian armies back to the Russian border we will not escalate the war into an invasion of Russia. I think that in itself would be cause the removal of Putin if not removed beforehand. I think the people of Russia are quite intelligent enough to understand our intention would demonstrate integrity, no matter what the propaganda machine would spill out to the Russian public.

[@openmindz7689]

Bruh, the corrupt corporate establishment media lies to us constantly. Also the corrupt career establishment politicians do want russia destroyed. They staged a coup in Ukraine to get rid of the previous administration because they were friends with russia or atleast wanted peace with russia. Theres alot were not being told and our corrupt whether if its in politics, or media has lied before to push us into these proxy wars. I'm an American and I'm very anti war but the corrupt isn't telling us the truth. I follow a few people in Ukraine and they've been exposing alot of stuff about ukraine. That's not even mentioning what we've been doing there as well.

[@Le-0N91]

Чего???Бред! НАТО это что?вы бы давно вторглись в Россию,если бы могли!

[@janet8146]

I don't think anyone would win.

[@williambranch4283]

Nobody has ever won a war, just lost less than the other guy.

[@janet8146]

@@williambranch4283 so true

[@greengangster3520]

Modern nukes are far different than the old dirty bombs. They have nukes now that they can detonate above a city and it vaporizes every living thing but leaves the buildings standing and the radiation decays very rapidly inside a few days. What they tell us about and what they really have are two different things. Imagine what we could accomplish as a species if we didnt need military and all that money and effort and research could go toward peaceful meaningful progress that allows us all to live far better lives.

[@garyedwardgray7549]

The vid, understandably (it’s US vs Russia) doesn’t take into account allied assistance. Why is this important? Because the vid DOES address the loss of weaponry in Ukraine. The SAMs and such are fine… Ukraine hasn’t been taking those out. BUT… Russian has used up 50-80% of their missiles on Ukraine. So…. What happens when Poland, Finland and others move in? Russia won’t have any missile capacity to attack across the border. So… I get it… this vid is just US versus Russia. But as one-sided as this video sounds it, incredibly, may be even MORE one sided than it depicts. Sadly, that would mean nukes are pretty much inevitable. Russia will be obliterated rapidly. Much faster than this vid suggests. So, they WILL resort to nukes. So… hopefully, it’ll never happen. For the record, yes, I do recognize they mentioned the NATO allies in Kaliningrad. But it would likely be far, FAR more than indicated here. So….. hope and pray this never happens. Russian survival would be threatened. It’d be much worse than this for Russia. They do not successfully address NATO involvement. Because of that desperation, Russia would go to nukes. I’ll say it a third time… hopefully, this never happens.

[@peragsnm6036]

Ok, try

[@BarnicleBillable]

Took a bit. I get it. US under normal control would not invade. These are not normal times.

[@kida12]

Wonder if this video took into account the weather? The US has mostly been in hot countries. If it is winter in Russia, things will be very different. Weather has defeated a lot of forces. I rather have a feeling the Russian civilians would favor surrender. Also curious if China would back Russia up.

[@ds--pu1tv]

I read somewhere that some branches of the U.S military were training in heavy snow and cold situations for that exact reason, imo heat is a lot more difficult to deal with though.

[@ryanschweinsburg296]

It's not like it's only cold in Russia you know

[@shawnmiller4781]

@@ds--pu1tv Yeah, it’s not like the US forces don’t have bases at Ft Drum NY, Ft Carson in Colorado and Ft Richardson, Greely and Wainwright in Alaska….all of which are known for their hot Winter weather.

[@shawnmiller4781]

@Ruslan Yeah that is cold but let’s face it, you don’t feel it after a certain temp

[@shawnmiller4781]

@Ruslan yeah! I’ve seen the video of them walking the sheets of frozen milk home

[@williamjordan5554]

Ms. B needs to understand that nuclear weapons keep nuclear powers from attacking each other out of fear. Getting rid of them would only make war more attractive as an option to those nations.

[@mabutoo]

I am not sure if you all know this but British military training is on par if not in many ways better than US training. I trained as a US soldiers with my British counterparts. They have my respect no question. Also, we would cut off retreating forces. We are only interested in surrender and won’t give retreating forces a chance to regroup.

[@Plastikdoom]

One thing lots of people forget, we have been at war against various groups/nations. Since we were still colonies, even before the Declaration of Independence, and in constant war since then…I got out of the USMC in 2010…most people have no idea the death and destruction we can bring, even without the airforce/army/navy support, besides the basics of getting us there, etc. but I mean without active navy support, like CVBGN aircraft and cruisers, etc. and that was 12 years ago…I’ve seen full up combined arms missions, of the US and a handful of NATO countries in Afghanistan, in Helmand province…how fast they happen, and shit starts blowing up. Wishing a second or few of each other. Of we want, is insane, and not like 5 things…literally a hundred targets or soviet writhing seconds of each other. With ground forces not too far behind to mop up/decors the area. And those were small attacks, haha.

[@bjcee1108]

But, look at who our pres is. He lacks the intelligence to do pretty much anything. Scary.

[@Plastikdoom]

Lol, no, we wouldn’t be running out of smart weapons, obviously he doesn’t know how they work. They are made as upgrades, they get added on quickly and cheaply to old, dumb weapons, only the new ones are purpose built as that. The kits are hideously easy, chest and fast to make for us. It’s child’s play, and to refit also. Not to mention our manufacturing is starting to spool up again, with large investments into them. And we also fully approved lend lease to ukraine…the mighty US war machine is about to fire up again, at least in goods

[@npc2153]

13:00 So while invading russia America isn't even in full wartime production mode yet? 😂

[@seekingredemption9804]

Boy this is terrifying

[@danchristopher7957]

America's military is without equal.... Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Syria.... bold my beer.

[@TheMadMadman]

Everyone on earth would die.

[@williambranch4283]

We all do anyway.

[@lindaclark7868]

No war is good.

[@zingelshyher8230]

So it's not "the us" inveding russia it's nato, and what about russia allies, China for example

[@Plastikdoom]

Ahaha, would be days at most, like 2-3 to kick them out of Russia…more than likely, only cause our supply lines would have trouble keeping up, just like the main thrusts, and even secondary/tertiary ones could keep up in the gulf war, and the war on terror, yes even the mighty US has to bow to logistics, or even kneel slightly when fighting on the opposite side the planet, from our country, while maintaining over 800 bases also…haha. And we maintain and staff all those bases, even during wartime, even increasing personnel while fighting a multiple front war.

[@amberfuchscia709]

Unfortunately for us and our allies, we are our own worst enemy. If we ever unify our politics (hopefully toward democracy and not fascism) we will be unstoppable. The typical attitude I have encountered is one of "You do not mess with us...we will destroy you." Of course, I spent most of my life married to a military intelligence man. My son was also MI, that may color my beliefs and attitudes.

[@liquidacid1983]

I'm sure the guys in Intelligence are having a field day trying to plan what might happen if war does break out considering our current commander in chief is a literal fucking potato who can't even read off a teleprompter properly. I don't envy their job.

[@shawnmiller4781]

Sorry but this a pretty fanciful video that makes a lot of assumptions that I don’t think can be counted on

[@kentgarrett701]

Always love and best wishes for the 2 of you. 😜🌷🌷

[@janiceduke1205]

Napoleon & Adolph tried this. What could possibly go wrong??

[@rickoshay2589]

They both lost.

[@jasonrichardson1999]

Except the US will keep it troops supplied with winter equipment

[@GreenBeamzzz]

US would obliterate Russia if it invaded but Russia would just use nukes to stop everything

[@janiceduke1205]

@@rickoshay2589 "They both lost." So this was the what went right part! 😊

[@janiceduke1205]

@@jasonrichardson1999 ​👏​👏​👏​

[@Atogatog-j9v]

Don't forget, this is even without the mention of involvement of other Nato members. Imagine if it was with the help of other Nato members.

[@happycactus]

In that scenario it’s only The US. However, there is no way the US would go it alone. If there was an invasion of Russia, it would be a NATO operation. There is no way Russia could stand up to the Western European powers as well as The US and Canada. That is the scenario that would actually occur. Think about that.

[@jonathanwatson5818]

I think the USA Military could handle Russia however all it would take is the USA Citizens traveling by boat to Russia armed to the teeth with our guns.

[@Plastikdoom]

Ahaha…no we wouldn’t need a new draft. All they’d do is call up us IAR guys…still about 20 million of us, from the last 21 years of fighting we’ve been involved in. Lol, and wel already know 90-95% of what the newer guys in now know. At least in the vast majority of cases, but we are also east and fast train, as we’ve already done that before, have the mindset, so that’s an easy 5-10 million of 90-95% trained, modern troops, without any new training, lol…and years to even a decade or 2 decades, of off and and on combat experience. We’d steam roll them, it’d be a joke.

[@-JA-]

❤️🇬🇧❤️🇺🇸❤️🇺🇦❤️

[@phirceoutdoors1280]

China would help Russia. Both countries believe they can survive nuclear war. World leaders would survive, us peasants wouldn't be as lucky.

[@tomleroyl]

I don’t think China would help them. At the beginning maybe, but any help would be deemed an act of war. The US would cancel all debt with them, and trade would grind to a halt quickly. To survive, they would have to join the rest of the world and I could see them at least remaining neutral. Best outcome would be joining NATO forces and invade Russia from the south, and trying to secure the vast resources of western Russia for themselves.

[@phirceoutdoors1280]

@@tomleroyl They already said they would if NATO got involved. Russia has China, Iran, Turkey, North Korea and a couple others. Those two hold the most resources. We can't get chips from China to make more weapons. China and Russia don't need us for anything. Check out Canadian Prepper. May all this get settled peacefully.

[@jdanon203]

I don't think China would help. You can't trust or depend on them. They may say they have a friendship with Russia that has no limits, but when push comes to shove, I think they'd rather sit on the sidelines and pick off the good parts of what's left. You see it with this Ukraine mess with both India and China telling Russia, alright time to wrap it up, so it took all of seven months for their support to start wavering.

[@mark2220]

I don't think the people replying to you understand how China would help Russia, maybe you don't either, idk.. they're not going to send in troops and wage war with them. They will provided assistance like we are providing to Ukraine, selling Russia the things they lack, and benefiting economically in the process. It would be very hypocritical of the US to call China out on this, as except for the fact that it's all being given to them instead of sold, we are doing the same thing to aid someone else's war.

[@devildog1912]

@@tomleroyl, correct me if I'm wrong, as I don't follow these things very closely, but do we not supply Ukraine with supplies? Would that not be considered, "an act of war" in Russia's eyes? As far as China is concerned, I'm sure the U.S. would love an excuse to, "cancel all debts with them", but they know we couldn't last more than a week without their cheap crap. I agree with them staying neutral, that would be to their advantage.

[@munnychinni5386]

Complete American propaganda 😂😂😂

[@АнтонОрехов-о1г]

good story)

[@bjcee1108]

Oh good grief, that is demented Joe in the video. America would be screwed.

[@mistrydul]

This is the type of video people make that play too much war thunder completely devoid of reality and common sense

[@МАРГАРИТКА-й2г]

Сказки НАТО НАЦИКОВ

[@ThatShyGuyMatt]

Currently we have four options if Russia does anything (including use a single nuke). Thre of the options we have would basically test Putin to see if he would back down or not. If not, then all three would end in a nuclear war. The last option is to have the CIA (or someone else) go in and take out Putin, as we know his leaders under him are way less likely to want to be as extreme as he is (at least with nukes). Fun fact. One of the three options is to detonate a nuke in the Atlantic ocean as a show of force that we aren't afraid to use them.

[@williambranch4283]

Russia (under Stalin) until now, don't have a "don't use first" doctrine.

[@jamesigorreilly979]

We’re sorta already lining up moving equipment into nato allies // ok James it’s now God saves the King - where is his stand on being a ally ; you and I are the little people and I’m a street gypsy not military

[@danielwestmoreland6407]

got it!

[@heathzimmerman4024]

❤🇺🇦

[@richk2793]

That was a stupid video. Still significantly over estimating Russia.

[@Knaakknaak]

I hope you two make a video called "What if the US Invades Jersey." Please do it. I don't even care who wins, the US or Jersey. I just wanna see the video you'd make. You can use a map and little green army men or whatever. I just wanna hear you both narrate it. Who in this feed agrees??? Go Beesleys!!!

[@williambranch4283]

Would love "What if Britain invades California" ... oh, not that Jersey?

[@jamesgirard4463]

Ukraine’s going to finish off Russian offensive capability

[@Knaakknaak]

Huge props to Millie for looking right into the camera and saying (I'm paraphrasing here ... ) "What's the point? There is no point. No one is gonna even know you won. We'll all be dead!" I wish every influential KZbinr would start doing what she just did and encouraging people to stop fighting. I'm a US citizen in Hawaii and I don't want to see this war escalate either. I can say that, with the exception of a few of our far right Nazi-like citizens, we Americans have no interest in "owning" Russia. We just want Russians to live their best lives. Since young Russians are very likely to be finding ways of streaming the internet, it seems to me that if more KZbinrs (and gamers) around the western world would start making clear statements like, 'Putin is evil,' 'Peace is a choice that can come from inside Russia if Russians demand it,' 'War is pointless,' etc etc etc, like Millie just did, it could actually motivate Russians (esp. younger Russians) to rise up against their evil dictator. I mean, what is the worst that can happen? Everyone gets ignored. What is the best? Russians listen, remove their dictator, install good leadership, and the planet moves one step closer to world peace. Thanks Millie for speaking up. I hope other influential KZbinrs (and gamers) follow your lead!

[@mnemonicpie]

Densest air defence network in the world will be defeated by B2 bombers from the previous century🤣

[@Bollywood-cr]

What the knowsence video

[@SoundRelaxus]

Hi My Friends. We love you guys. But you are right . Here in the 🇺🇸 USA where I live. Almost everyone in the southeast USA has many guns. I personally have 15. Including semi automatic rifles.

[@plother4242]

With the US having the second amendment which allows citizens to have guns, there are millions of guns owned by people all over the United States. There are people who frequently quote Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto as saying: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Which would be a true statement but the quote is unverified and no one really know's for sure if he really said it. Anyone would have a problem invading us though since one, we have a massive military and two, millions of citizens are armed and would protect their homes at any cost. We would protect our neighbors or anyone else who needed it also.

[@madeinussr2677]

soon the US will have to return Alaska😂

[@AlexisLopez-pb8ms]

It’s not hopefully always when it comes to being allied with the Uk. It’s ALWAYS

[@Fabian-Wenzel]

What is suppressed here is that US airborne units must immediately secure all Russian silos for intercontinental ballistic missiles and all other storage sites for other nuclear weapons. At the same time, all Russian submarines must be cut off from communications with headquarters so that no orders are given to use ballistic missiles; in addition, all U.S. and British fighter submarines must begin tracking down and destroying all Russian submarines.

[@npc2153]

Invading America and Invading Russia are not the same. The citizens with guns vs the citizens without guns. The russian citizens cant stop U.S troop from marching up and down their streets. Try that in the states😂

[@xdarockstar2560]

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@MdRakib-o6i4e]

😂😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪

[@michaelpalmer7954]

Hey everyone - sending this note to those who don't have Jesus, yet. We are in what the Bible calls the "end times," and I'm sure you see the signs all around us. Please - believe in our Lord Jesus Christ today. He died on the cross to cover our sins so that we may be saved, and to avoid the judgment that is coming. When you believe in him, and accept His gift of salvation, you will be saved. Our time is so, so short. I am praying for you all. Ephesian 2:8; John 3: 16-18; 1 Corinthians 15: 1-4; Romans 10: 9-10. You can read the Bible online...

[@debbiejohnson3418]

People forget that the USA is the only country to ever deploy nuclear weapons and we used them twice. Why is it ok for us to still have them but we get all worked up when other countries have them

[@shawnmiller4781]

They ended WWII

[@williambranch4283]

@@shawnmiller4781 That and the Soviet Union declaring war on Japan.

[@williambranch4283]

I think everyone should have at least one nuke. In their capital under their leaders.

[@theneverwhere6076]

@@shawnmiller4781 WW2 ended with fall of Germany thanks to USSR, Japan would've not done even half the damage Germany did even if no one used nukes

[@real_lostinthefogofwar]

Ukraine has been draining NATO of weapons and ammo, while Russia is just about to get started

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

Lmfao check global firepower to see russian vs nato weapons and u can understand. Russia has a lot of ammo and this is the reason why they buy from N. Korea and Iran :))

[@real_lostinthefogofwar]

@@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr Iranian drones are quite effective, why wouldn't they buy them, the more suppliers you have, the better off you are, it is Ukraine begging for weapons, not Russia., Russia is about to start taking things seriously, so we'll see.

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

@@real_lostinthefogofwar yeah they are starting rly serios losing a new city this night :))

[@real_lostinthefogofwar]

@@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr We will see, don't raise the victory flag until the battle is over.

[@williambranch4283]

Unfortunately, doubling down is rarely a good strategy. Didn't work for the Axis. If the Axis stopped expanding in early 1941, not invade the Soviet Union, not declare war on the US ... they win.

[@risalangdon9883]

I think the creator of this video has totally underestimated Russian capabilities. The war with Ukraine isn't a good comparison as Putin is trying to minimize civilian casualties. And Ukraine forces are using their civilians as shields. I think Russia has a whole lot more capabilities than they let on.

[@Jace-xw3ly]

Nice try Russian bot.

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

Lmfao russian army suck, they can t even find and destroy a few himars lmfao

[@zclaudteoriasdbs7964]

Yes Russia is not really trying but it makes people believe Russia is weaker than it actually is

[@shawnmiller4781]

I think every mass grave being doubts after the Russian army retreats is proving the avoiding civilian deaths claim by Russia is a lie.

[@NarwahlGaming]

Russia is direct depositing missiles into apartment buildings, hospitals and nuclear power plants. That doesn't sound like minimal effort nor trying to save civilians. You've seen the mass graves in Ukraine, yeah?