Thank you for the opportunity to listen to these two great filmmakers ❤
@TheBella2u10 ай бұрын
What interview did you watch? He’s great. Didn’t break in all the time and allowed her plenty of time to finish.
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
True!
@simonjenkin10 ай бұрын
god i wish they'd gotten a better interviewer
@sunnysideup3310 ай бұрын
A secret mansplainer. He is rude and arrogant. No respect for Sopia. He don't even understand "There is always a girl trying..." On that point, it's easy to see, where he comes from.
@Tracydot310 ай бұрын
He made me so uncomfortable.
@j.s330010 ай бұрын
😂😂
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
@@sunnysideup33 But Sofia says this herself, early on. So he's just reflecting her words back. You're not much of a commentator TBH.
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
@@Tracydot3 ...because? How about just accepting he's from a different generation, but this is about the exploration. If your'e constantly signposting it's just very difficult to enjoy yourself. He and she both refer to the edit function of the current generation and he says his daughter is always on his shoulder and this is why he rarely says much these days. They are observing and reflecting so try to do the same without so much judging. Judging is useful but then it gets in the way. This is one of those times. IMO
@yearofthedragonjane10 ай бұрын
Oh how I love Sofia
@TheFulhamboy10 ай бұрын
Richard Curtis in conversation*
@sunnysideup3310 ай бұрын
With himselfe.
@johnsharman726210 ай бұрын
" Nice to see where we're going" says Sofia, after a long rambling question. He at times seems to use her as an aide de memoire of his own thoughts.😢
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
I think the interview is charmingly rambling and SC seems to be enjoying herself. You can tell by the tone of her voice. She is opening up about the creative process and because Curtis is doing it from POV of another writer film maker it's got a less structured more exploratory focus. I don't see her remark is being snippy or critical at all. It's just reflective. At the end she clearly says, "that was so fun!" and touches him on the arm by way of reassurance Aware that he is in awe of her and felt inadequate to the job. If she so clearly enjoyed it, why can't we?
@j.s33005 ай бұрын
Fanboys are annoying
@zunamiii10 ай бұрын
Sofia is so talented and lovely !
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
She has a very kind and non-egoistic way of being. I'm sure she's got toughness there, it's obvious that to be successful it is there. But she is so comfortable with being sensitive and collaborative. This is the way!
@TheUndeclaredNation10 ай бұрын
i thought interviewer was very complimentary of sofia idk
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
People need to be offended on her behalf, even when she is clearly quite enjoying herself.
@burgesssam10 ай бұрын
thank you sofia
@PokhrajRoy.10 ай бұрын
So happy to see her in this interview yay
@sabrinaerickson70988 ай бұрын
Who is the interviewer?
@EL-ub2df28 күн бұрын
18:00 on self-doubt
@asimhanif76106 ай бұрын
Daughter of a father who defined culture daughter who wrote in between travel's. Lost in translation
@Auldreekie96710 ай бұрын
You lost me at Richard Curtis
@commonwunder9 ай бұрын
Sofia Coppola made her own 'Life Without Zoë,' when she made 'directed/wrote' 'On the Rocks' 2020. In it there's a conceit that asks the viewer to believe, an African American would cheat on his wife. The whole movie balances on the idea that he might? Whereas 'modern audiences' know that could never happen, in a movie made by Ms.Coppola. That would be racial stereotyping. Which is not acceptable anywhere, let alone in a mainstream film. It is Life Without Zoë part two... a voyage into a childlike dream, of what the adult world must be like. She wrote a narrative story, in order to appease societal standards... that kamikazes itself from the get-go. The telling thing is, I doubt she was even aware of it. As a filmmaker and as an adult.. do you think she was really that naive, or is she just that exceptionally privileged?
@DennisMHenderson2 ай бұрын
I will send you a tool of attrition if you tell me where to. Nice effort on your typical googlite attempt to impress yourself with conglomerate gibberish🎉
@jerdonsbabbler35152 ай бұрын
Like an army brat! I made a short film!
@SUBSYNDICATE10 ай бұрын
what about the futuristic Metropolis movie she's about to make?
@nonever1010 ай бұрын
Her father, Francis Coppola, is making Megalopolis.
@antoinepetrov10 ай бұрын
It's her father, not her. What a misconception she's got anything to do with her father's work. And also, Metropolis was made by Fritz Lang almost 100 years ago, you're talking about Megalopolis
@jazzy4cool10 ай бұрын
@@antoinepetrovbrah chill💀 u can inform in a nicer wat lol
@marcomollo4524Ай бұрын
interviewer talking too much and constantly interrupting the flow.
@LeekClock10 ай бұрын
Curtis is patronising and sycophantic at the same time. "You should be very proud of the quality of your work" -- as if he'd end on that chestnut after interviewing a successful male director.
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
No he's just got a very British and old fashioned mode of expression. He means it sincerely and is showing respect and understanding in his questions.
@progressivedemagogue84807 ай бұрын
Shut up
@jerdonsbabbler35152 ай бұрын
@@deborahcurtis1385 That’s correct. He’s also showing her respect for coming out from under her father’s shadow. Michael Douglas was subject to the same.
@deborahcurtis13852 ай бұрын
@@jerdonsbabbler3515 Yes, British people don't gush as much as some would like. They're measured statements. If gushing is normalised then language loses meaning. It's like saying 'very unique', given that 'unique' is an absolute, either something is unique or it isn't. By adding the superfluous 'very' it' strips the adjective 'unique' of meaning. Because this becomes normalised, it becomes socially essential to include 'very' or it seems like you're damning with faint praise. I'm not British myself, but Australian. But our points stand. People go blah blah blah and don't really consider the weight of the words they use. It's a honestly a bit sad. It seems like we can only reliably communicate with emojis
@jerdonsbabbler35152 ай бұрын
@@deborahcurtis1385 You know what’s another bad one? Overly. Over is enough.
@taufiqhariyadi10 ай бұрын
@sunnysideup3310 ай бұрын
Richard Curtis. What horrible person.
@pooperscooper00210 ай бұрын
why? im not through the video yet i dont think he seems so egregious
@commonwunder9 ай бұрын
Elvis had the same upbringing as Michael Jackson would... many years later. He also lived in an ultra protective cloud where saying no to him was never an option. He was a 'forever child' and that brings with it some severe mental deviations from the norm. But the 'Priscilla' movie is an extremely poor 'one-sided' account of what actually happened. Priscilla was/is no wallflower. She knew exactly what she wanted and used manipulation to achieve it. She saw a man-child and made herself indispensable to him. She manipulated her family to be allowed to visit him. She wanted the huge house, money and servants to attend to her every whim. There're many women who have had terrible experiences in their life... Priscilla is just not one of them.
@carmenlopezmendez58629 ай бұрын
How can you say SHE manipulated him????? she was 14
@stonek5427 ай бұрын
She was a child...Nice try though
@commonwunder7 ай бұрын
@@carmenlopezmendez5862 Because he had the mental age of a twelve year old.
@commonwunder7 ай бұрын
@@stonek542 So was he... she just happened to be less of child than he was.
@stonek5427 ай бұрын
@@commonwunder Dude he was a 24 years old man and she was a 14 year old child. Stop being delusional.
@chelseyhalloweenn10 ай бұрын
That interviewer is so annoying
@j.s330010 ай бұрын
That director
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
Glad you got that out of your system? Can you find anything good about the interview because I found plenty. Coppola clearly has respect for him even if you do not.
@coliemaurie552610 ай бұрын
It's really a problem to base a movie pretending that she would be portraying one of the most legendary artists only based on the very subjective ex' wife's side of their private story; or even worst : portraying independent women of the sixties based on Priscilla Presley’s very few years of such a bad marriage
@j.s330010 ай бұрын
As opposed to any other biopic...grow up
@coliemaurie552610 ай бұрын
@@j.s3300 which book for Baz Lurhmann movie ?
@j.s330010 ай бұрын
@@coliemaurie5526 if you dont know then why even bother? Silly person
@coliemaurie552610 ай бұрын
@@j.s3300 Everyone knows that Baz Lurhmann's biopic like many other ones is not based on any book. Keep calm and enjoy that fiction movie.
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
I'd like to read your summary of Proust. Man has bored days and spends his time reflecting. The end.
@sigma_curry10 ай бұрын
Nepo baby
@deborahcurtis138510 ай бұрын
I think that label should be reserved for those without talent, and those who do nothing worthwhile.
@65g49 ай бұрын
Oh go away im so sick of people calling her a nepo baby shes done her career on her own her terms she didnt need her dads help
@deborahcurtis13859 ай бұрын
@@65g4 They want her to get her memory of her childhood, her family and her life erased, and on the streets to put her supposedly on equal footing with the rest of us. It's bizarre, I feel like everyone should watch some Chekhov to sort themselves out, but that's way too subtle, I fear. Uncle Vanya. The Cherry Orchard. it's all about the wistful demise of the cultured, and the imminent Bolshevic Revolution. Everyone's got a theoretical solution. but life is complex. This is what Sofia Coppola celebrates the complexity the subtlety and the joy. I"m not saying we can't use more social equality but picking on SC is ill-conceived at best.
@moviemazlow9 ай бұрын
Yes, and?
@noBearAdventures5 ай бұрын
I don’t know if you can call someone a nepo baby when they end up being super talented. Would you call Ken Griffey Jr. a nepo baby? Or do they have a combination of great genes for their chosen profession, as well as the benefit of being around the craft/sport of their parents for their entire lives. Here’s what I’m saying… my dad was an amazing businessman, who is amazing with his money and finances. And yet… I learned all of that from him my whole life, and I couldn’t suck more at that stuff if I tried. Lol. I had every opportunity to be a “nepo baby” from him: but I just didn’t have the “talent”. That said, I have my own talents that he doesn’t posses. We’re all good at something