Autonomous weapons and international law

  Рет қаралды 12,563

Brookings Institution

Brookings Institution

6 жыл бұрын

The introduction of artificial intelligence and robotics to future scenarios of warfare is posing new challenges to national and international codes of law, ethics, and human rights. Technological advances are fast outpacing the deliberative process of public debate and law-making that should determine the rules for the design and use of such lethal technologies. Ongoing talks at the United Nations to regulate such weapons are raising a host of complex questions around who is responsible for their development and deployment on the battlefield of the future.
The fifth annual Justice Stephen Breyer lecture on international law addressed these issues from legal, ethical, and military perspectives.
www.brookings.edu/events/auto... (transcript available)
Subscribe! kzbin.info_c...
Follow Brookings on social media!
Facebook: / brookings
Twitter: / brookingsinst
Instagram: / brookingsinst
LinkedIn: / the-brookings-institution

Пікірлер: 11
@SkyFather
@SkyFather 7 ай бұрын
very informative. I wish they were given more time.
@philsarazen6619
@philsarazen6619 5 жыл бұрын
Enable a computer to adjudicate international law. The computer will be open source. When international conflict occurs, the computer will amalgamate all the peace proposals from around the world and provide for conflict resolution. All those implementing the computer’s amalgamation will wear the latest lie detector and mind reading devices so as to ensure the best choice of personnel. The computer will use the data from the amalgamated peace proposals to expand the law and or provide avenues by which rogue states such as the US can participate. If we can submit into a computer all the human information (wisdom based experience) such that it becomes our collective wisdom, then it will most on most occasions out do any one of us as socially brilliant as we think we are.
@aps-pictures9335
@aps-pictures9335 3 жыл бұрын
Opening speaker’s arguments were very weak and could use work, less dramatic and more substance would improve their performance.
@sinOsiris
@sinOsiris 2 жыл бұрын
sure agreement next thing you know.... overtaken overridden abandonement ----
AI Weapons, War and Ethics
46:31
Gresham College
Рет қаралды 3,5 М.
The day of the sea 🌊 🤣❤️ #demariki
00:22
Demariki
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН
Final muy inesperado 🥹
00:48
Juan De Dios Pantoja
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Получилось у Вики?😂 #хабибка
00:14
ХАБИБ
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
American democracy is under threat. How do we protect it?
1:00:24
Brookings Institution
Рет қаралды 1,2 М.
Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Humanitarian Law
52:39
American Red Cross International Humanitarian Law
Рет қаралды 1 М.
State of the global economy: Are the clouds clearing at last?
1:29:45
Brookings Institution
Рет қаралды 1,8 М.
Noam Chomsky: On China, Artificial Intelligence, & The 2024 Presidential Election.
1:03:24
Through Conversations Podcast
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Abortion access is a medical issue. Why isn’t it being treated like one?
1:08:49
Supporting Black-owned businesses to drive economic development
1:02:16
Brookings Institution
Рет қаралды 530
Scope of the law in armed conflict. 3/4 IHL's applicability to extra-territorial drone strikes
20:26
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
Рет қаралды 9 М.
The day of the sea 🌊 🤣❤️ #demariki
00:22
Demariki
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН