Good stuff! Would have really liked to see the version with a better bucket design though!
@spitsyn.andrey3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Looking forward for CFD-DEM Coupled simulation part 3.
@VitoCalabrese-e7b28 күн бұрын
Really nice simulation, please let me see how it does continue...thanks !
@IstasPumaNevada Жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed this and would like to see the final results.
@rojinathan24572 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the informative message, I could clearly understand the working principle of the bucket elevator. Thanks a lot!
@KyleMoon4783 жыл бұрын
Can you please make the simulation available on your website.
@victoryakeh28184 ай бұрын
Would love to see the final results
@alwiwibawa2946 Жыл бұрын
Finally video that I've been looking for!! Great job!! Hopefully you can give me some tutorial
@treadless_co2 жыл бұрын
Please share the updated geometry video! (Or, is the updated bucket angle shown at 0:19?)
@paulanderson262 Жыл бұрын
I find this very fascinating, I was wondering if the shape of the bucket would make a difference? It would be interesting if the bucket was sloped less than 90 degrees to the belt. Would it discharge more completely and sooner? Thanks again
@engineerdo6568 Жыл бұрын
It depends a lot on shape, friction values, the bulk material properties and centrifugal acceleration...
@arty2k10 ай бұрын
What if the buckets were not fixed but instead a swing and the contents were tipped?
@Indonesia01ianАй бұрын
Hi, do you know how to do validation in DEM software? I am new in ROCKY DEM. In case of Ansys Fluent, normally we use several parameters such as Residual Value, Conservation of Mass and Energy, Mesh Independency Test and Iteration test. How about DEM? Could you please inform it to us Thank you so much for your help and support
@nam-tran-bulk2 минут бұрын
DEM codes like Rocky does not have an inherent way to track the sanity of a simulation like residual monitoring in CFD. What engineers need to do is to compare a DEM material model with a smaller scale calibration experiment and make sure the parameters can produce the same bulk behaviour in the experiment. If you are using Rocky then there should be the Calibration Suite that you can refer to.
@joerg_lerch2 жыл бұрын
Tres bien. Meci. Have you tried to change the geometrie of the buckets?
@khetebhaloporomanno Жыл бұрын
Did u show the final results?
@wseeweeeessw9 ай бұрын
I'm having that problem I get to much sand back after 110 tons per hour and overloading my motor
@tommybaier7844 ай бұрын
Leider keine Kontaktdaten... Tja ich hätte eine grandiose Idee muss ich wohl mit wem anderen machen schade...
@davidcorrea16633 жыл бұрын
Thank you, for another great video!!
@narimanmozaffari94552 ай бұрын
Hi, i want to model a real elavator that i had designed and got a problem Can you please help me?
@engineerdo65682 ай бұрын
Probably. Please go to engineerdo.com and write me an E-Mail with your specifications of your simulation model. We can offer custom simulations to you.
@narimanmozaffari9455 Жыл бұрын
hi by which software did you analyse this model?
@engineerdo6568 Жыл бұрын
Its called Liggghts
@wazjebk2 жыл бұрын
Hi, would like to see final result - very nice video - I like your channel.
@engineerdo65682 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@007aha13 жыл бұрын
really interesting video
@ashrafashour-ni2wy Жыл бұрын
I need final
@moritzmoritz13143 жыл бұрын
Hallo Henrig, finde deine Videos echt gut. Womit machst du eigentlich deine Animationen für KZbin?
@engineerdo65683 жыл бұрын
Paraview and the universal tool for every engineer: PowerPoint
@woodzyfox4735 Жыл бұрын
your missing One key aspect with the lifts, real world lifts have a slight negative (-5) tilt back on the top side to help dump more on the down stroke in to the funnel this will prevent items form returning at a much higher rate. I fix these for a living, its real trust me :) Think of it as a inverted drop roller coster
@engineerdo6568 Жыл бұрын
To clarify: are the buckets tilted backwards on the belt?