Buddhism Without Beliefs with Stephen Batchelor

  Рет қаралды 2,269

A Skeptic's Path to Enlightenment

A Skeptic's Path to Enlightenment

4 ай бұрын

Nearly 30 years ago, Stephen Batchelor wrote a book called Buddhism without Beliefs that's become a foundational work for those seeking to adopt Buddhism into a non-religious form while still maintaining the power and authenticity of it's time tested practices.
I had a chance to speak with Stephen Batchelor recently from his home in France, where he shared his own creative struggle with Buddhism. From his origins as an ordained Tibetan Buddhist monk to becoming a skeptical agnostic who admits that he simply doesn't know the answers to life's biggest questions.
Episode 157: www.skepticspath.org/podcast/...

Пікірлер: 12
@kgrandchamp
@kgrandchamp 3 ай бұрын
Thank you Scott and Stephen for this lovely conversation! I've read a few of Stephen's books and they where foundational in my life and the way I practice the dharma. I have been following Bernardo Kastrup's analytical idealist views on metaphysics and would really love to know how Stephen would consider Bernardo's profound thinking and intuitions! Thanks again! 🌿
@mcglass7573
@mcglass7573 3 ай бұрын
an interesting wide open discussion, thank you
@skepticspath
@skepticspath 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for listening!
@benbashore8561
@benbashore8561 3 ай бұрын
Fine discussion.
@willoanz
@willoanz 3 ай бұрын
Very interesting conversation indeed ! I love the honesty and humility of Stephen, as well as his particular and unique journey toward wisdom (for a better word ...). Still, the matter of faith cannot be ignored, does it ? Even our so-called rational apprehension of "reality" is, on the bottom line, a matter of belief. There is a gambling part in any engagement with a discipline toward wisdom and full consciousness that cannot be avoided. So, what is the meaning of the precious human existence, so fleeting and fragile ?
@HumanThings-sz8dc
@HumanThings-sz8dc 25 күн бұрын
It depends on what you mean by faith. If it means excluding conceptual thought from engaging with practice altogether then yes it should be ignored as an unskillful fixation, which when you think about it is just the conceptual mind coming to the conclusion that itself should be excluded. However if you mean by faith those cognitive faculties that do not have their basis in conceptual thought and have a characteristic of trust that can be guiding in a skillful manner while at the same time not excluding the conceptual mind and not fixating on the conceptual when these other faculties are at play I would agree with you. 'You can think in a no-think way, that's the art' ~ Alan Watts (talk on zen Buddhism)
@lingy74
@lingy74 3 ай бұрын
Just like how there are Brahminnic paths and tantric paths in Sanantani, you can be vajrayana, mahayana or sarvakayana in Buddhism. Preferring one over another does not invalidate the methods of the other schools. The moment you think Buddhism 'should' be this and 'should' discard that, you are ultimately trying to restrict a path that is extremely vast. Buddha dharma has the idea of dhatus - the elements that make up your inclinations and karma that draws you towards one way or another and different individuals have different inclinations and are suited for different methods.
@tonbonthemon
@tonbonthemon 2 ай бұрын
All due respect to Bachelor, I know what it's like to struggle with Dharma practice and find stuff that is challenging. But I think he is taking so many liberties here and doesn't acknowledge the possibility that his resistance to "traditional" methods is just a result of his cultural bias, which is evident in what he *does* prefer: art, autonomy, meaning, utopia... he's just trying to practice Buddhism as he wants it to be, rather than take it on its own terms. It's really kind of a Romanticism he wants, not what the core teachings describe. It's like if somebody gave you a hammer and nails to build a house because they said gravity brings everything down, and you need to nail stuff in place so it stays upright. Then Stephen comes along and says, "actually, I don't mind gravity bringing stuff down. Who says I have to use this hammer for nailing stuff down and building houses? I'd rather use it to sift through the rubble and make music. I don't like wearing hardhats and getting splinters." Sure, go ahead, but don't call it construction...
@lucilianogueira3072
@lucilianogueira3072 2 ай бұрын
A Jewish secular Buddhist. Love it. Lol
@arthurmair8901
@arthurmair8901 Ай бұрын
interesting, but far too many jump-cuts...why is it? it feels like the conversation as recorded has been too filtered..
@skepticspath
@skepticspath 18 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback!
Laurie Anderson's Buddhism: Art, Meditation, and Death as Adventure
38:27
A Skeptic's Path to Enlightenment
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Can A Seed Grow In Your Nose? 🤔
00:33
Zack D. Films
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Jumping off balcony pulls her tooth! 🫣🦷
01:00
Justin Flom
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
Советы на всё лето 4 @postworkllc
00:23
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
КАК ДУМАЕТЕ КТО ВЫЙГРАЕТ😂
00:29
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism (15 Minute Brilliancy!)
16:24
Daily Dose Of Wisdom
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Am I a Buddhist? Stephen Batchelor reflects
30:45
Bodhi College
Рет қаралды 668
Carl Jung's Synchronicity: meaningful patterns in life
27:58
OurTimelessWisdom
Рет қаралды 382 М.
Stages of Enlightenment
26:42
Ajahn Sona
Рет қаралды 91 М.
Stephen Batchelor & Brad Warner 1: Talking About Reality
14:33
Hardcore Zen
Рет қаралды 8 М.
How to Heal Despair with Venerable Robina Courtin
46:38
A Skeptic's Path to Enlightenment
Рет қаралды 513
The Psychology of Buddhist Tantra with Psychotherapist Rob Preece
47:48
A Skeptic's Path to Enlightenment
Рет қаралды 6 М.
A Conversation between Stephen Batchelor and Bhikkhu Santi
1:30:03
Secular Buddhist Network
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Can A Seed Grow In Your Nose? 🤔
00:33
Zack D. Films
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН