Building the 34x34 Rubik's cube!

[@DadicekCz]

Bro i can't believe the turning quality is so friggin GOOD

[@MR-SINISTER76]

Me neither i mean its terrible if your trying to speed solve it but for that size id expect turning it to be nearly impossible and id pop if you did anything slightly wrong

[@drushia3259]

You can only do u moves tho, and the stand/table he uses aligns the cube for him. So the turning probably still sucks

[@stupidgenius42]

Well tuned 3D printers can make some extremely accurate parts, and in cases with large surface areas the layer lines can help reduce friction.

[@ThePro-Simple]

Make the 50 by 50

[@cheke_hs]

Not saying you’re wrong, but the cube’s size definitely plays a factor in how good it can turn

[@Frogfan14]

That cube is heavier then me when I was a teenager

[@tonllenos]

It would take me 67 years to solve it

[@TheNoob17]

Next vid: This is why I’m rebuilding my 34x34x34 because i accidentally scrambled it while unsolving the checkerboard pattern.

[@aidenxiong2945]

Now rotate it vertically

[@theblackwidower]

Alright, now scramble it up.

[@jorgeemilioamadorperez4797]

A calculator: 0.98 sec

[@MWWWWWWWWMWWWWWWWWWMWWWWWWWWWM]

Why don't you make the edge pieces an equal size as the inner pieces?

[@bogusWasHere]

I recommend watching the video “The 6x6 Rubik’s Cube Should NOT Be Possible” by J Perm for an explanation on that

[@flyingcow9491]

Can somebody please do the calculation for.how many combinations this has?

[@samthemachine-nv3ky]

Pov the people making jjk

[@MasterLucario]

My gym equipment 😅

[@Demi-l7d]

Do a 10 by 10

[@CountD42]

I remember around 2001 people online were theorizing what is the largest possible Rubik's cube that could be built without using magnets. (The avoidance of magnets was to get around the fact that magnets could help hold larger cubes together so things like corner pieces wouldn't have to be physically attached to the core; this was before magnets were used for speed.) I knew an architecture undergrad who made a detailed diagram of, iirc, a 17x17x17 cube that could (at the time) theoretically be built, though it would require somebody to have the means to manufacture all of those parts. Back then people had to consider things like the limitations of injection molding, or that no company would sell a cube heavy enough to be too unwieldy to turn. It's wild how 3d printing has completely transformed how we approach building something like this. I love this age of "I made a thing because I could" engineering.

[@_Sparky144]

Technology is amazing! :D

[@TheToasterHasAscended]

that's a lot of words and i completely agree with them

[@katiekawaii]

That additional context makes it even cooler.

[@mastershooter64]

3D printing (and additive manufacturing in general) is extremely cool, but I'm pretty sure this could've been done without 3D printers as well (though it may have been more difficult? I'm not sure)

[@GreatGriffin821]

No, people on the internet around 2001 were like, "THEY HIT THE FUCKING TOWERS!"

[@Jak-it]

Now solve it

[@Be_a_znig]

I think when he's scrambling the big cube, then he would solve it in 1-2 days.

[@matthewbany1179]

At least a week because how long it takes to just rotate the cube itself plus finding all the pieces

[@mikzares7238]

NO

[@xCamiscoolx]

Let's just focus on how long he will scramble it first

[@jonathanmellqvist2]

​@@Be_a_znig not even close. They and think a little about it.

[@cloedingman2077]

The fact it functions is a miracle of engineering.

[@Shaeffen_]

Yeah to make the corners not fall off mainly.

[@cloedingman2077]

@Shaeffen_ Yeah, I've seen cubes barely more than half this size crumble with one turn.

[@Lukcarrot]

that corner piece is HUGE

[@sajeded]

Thats what she said😅

[@happyyara]

It's like a 3x3😂

[@lukaspapousek8572]

​@@happyyaraYou have to solve for each corner piece separately

[@happyyara]

@@lukaspapousek8572 I know, I meant that the corner piece is the same size as a 3x3

[@damarzrealm7731]

Yeah the bigger the cube gets, the larger the corner piece has to be (otherwise it’ll fall off if you turn it)

[@prithindevastatordevastato5379]

I can't even think about how much patient this guy is

[@gavinludwig2694]

Grammar errors just btw

[@Flametilezyxe]

You now have the world record it used to be 33x33 now it is 34x34

[@ADM_RAMconsumingfox]

Fun fact: even numbered cubes are harder to assemble He could have done the 35x35 instead

[@TheRubySpider]

@@ADM_RAMconsumingfoxhe essentially did build a 35x35, but just doesn’t get credit for one of the layers.

[@bennyellis3512]

​@@TheRubySpider🤨 whaddya mean by that

[@TheRubySpider]

@@bennyellis3512 the way even numbered cubes are constructed is that there’s an extra set of moving pieces hidden inside that serve the same function as a middle layer on an odd numbered cube.

[@bennyellis3512]

@@TheRubySpider Oh! I remember seeing something like that on 2X2 cubes and I saw the square on the 34X34 and was wondering if it was a similar part. Thank you for the clarification! 😀

[@nameshuu4503]

the fact that he went through the effort of building a 34x34 even though a 35x35 would use the same number of pieces makes the build even crazier than i thought

[@tbran794]

people can't even solve a 3x3 and people could solve that well done man!

[@Pavankumarpuramreal]

Months

[@mrwataaah]

if you know how to solve a 4x4 and 5x5 you can solve any cube

[@atharvpro_The_Legend]

i know how to solve 9 by 9

[@drushia3259]

​@@mrwataaahnah, the minimum puzzle you need to learn for larger puzzles is 7x7 iirc

[@Raspy1243]

​@not_mrwataaah square one? Jkjk, I know that's not what you meant 😂

[@ITZV2LT]

The fact that it's 3d printed with all those moving parts is crazy

[@shinjiiiiiiiiii]

Yeah i can’t believe it doesn’t just explode from its own weight and friction when moving it

[@lord0fthecubes]

I can't believe there's a Rubik's cube that weighs almost as much as I do Obligatory "thanks for all the likes" edit

[@da_chimken]

Fr😂😂😂

[@CrippleX89]

It’ll be a while before there’s one that weighs as much as your mom 🥳

[@orphankicker4384]

​@Venezia13do do you mean pounds or kilos?

[@manavshah8335]

@@orphankicker4384 he means the currency dumbo

[@lord0fthecubes]

Whichever one was used in the yt short idk

[@SpectrumSwordtails]

Everyone is talking about how impressive the cube looks. But I'm more amazed at the man's dedication. He spent a whole year assembling this thing and he even made a stop motion animation out of it. The dedication to these vids he makes, I tell you, it is real.

[@MustafaAnimates]

he even brought a frigging forklift ahh thing to carry it. that really *is* dedication

[@leaderoftheautobots1985]

@@MustafaAnimates real

[@MonkeyDfamGaming]

Cube: *pops* Man who spent thousands of hours building the cube:

[@MysteryMob-tv5fp]

Now make a 34×34×34×34 Rubik's Hypercube

[@AlecCole-ue8yp]

He cant

[@DevrimKanneci]

tesseract

[@BlueTheSilkwing]

@@AlecCole-ue8yp majique

[@konstantinospalapanidis6414]

Even better: find god's number for this by brute force calculations.

[@a.a.1012]

nah, a 34⁵ is better

[@aurunabhsarker4487]

School teacher: Show how to solve 3*3 Homework: Solve this really simple 34*34 cube.

[@ostanceyeongshorts]

Can we just apperciate his effort on this cube for a video!

[@myanmarman4988]

bot

[@KillerKatz12]

@@myanmarman4988bot

[@JodaCraft]

Well done man! You deserve more respect

[@fufericastudios9595]

Imagine jamming that thing and accidentally popping it up 💀 (in all seriousness, this one of the coolest things I've seen in my life!)

[@Raidenthewizard444]

It’s so satisfying hearing the Rubiks cube ton

[@AarushRavez]

I wonder why they don't make the pieces even, and more cubical... Does it have anything to do with structural integrity?

[@nintendomal9161]

You are absolutely insane, this is incredible. I love stop motions and i love rubiks cubes, this wouldve taken forever to do. You deserve all the respect, good job Matt

[@a-bison]

Did you know that it is not possible to officially compete with a rubix cube more than 34x34 dimensions? For more information Google rule 34

[@M4A3Sherman-w8s]

We need a celebrity to share this, get this man the credit he deserves!

[@SpectrumSwordtails]

What we need is guinness world records to come down and give this thing a look.

[@coconutrillion7021]

I know a way he can solve it: TAKE IT A PART AND REBUILD IT AGAIN. 😮😂

[@korgansphil3768]

Imagine if it popped💀

[@CoolNepaliDude]

ye

[@Your_Average_Rabbit]

imagine dropping it 💀

[@aratof18]

​@@Your_Average_Rabbitassuming you could pick it up at all lol

[@Your_Average_Rabbit]

​@@aratof18*uses crane or forklift instead*

[@carsonlohr2781]

Would you ever consider selling the SLTs to any of your projects? Great video!

[@Rysterio]

When it turns it's so satisfying

[@naseer42997]

I'm 70 pounds, 9, and a rubix cube has more weight than me😂

[@WallNutBreaker524]

Technology is Beautiful as it allows people to make such awesome content and things, and the Internet is beautiful for allowing talented, skilled or devoted people like this person to show us these things.

[@samuelparvin9334]

You could probably max a clash of clans account faster than solving this ☠️

[@Cubing4U]

This deserves more views

[@therealbrentrolland]

And it’s a marvel!!!! Brilliant work, sir!

[@AwaisKing-ie9cp]

Bro please make tutorial how to make design of rubik cube in com😊

[@GERMANHIPPOPOTAMUS]

Dang that’s impressive

[@ovechka3225]

Ты лучший бро, ты должен попасть в рекорд Гиннеса! 🏆 😎

[@Jak-it]

I wonder what the equation to solve it would be just like yhere is one for the normal ones

[@LeyScar]

Same process as all cubes bigger than a 5x5, just longer.

[@Aerolite_FPS]

@@LeyScarimagine getting triple parity

[@robloxglitch8707]

@@Aerolite_FPS💀💀💀

[@MaximilianBerkmann]

There are no equations needed or any maths needed (besides elementary). And if he can solve a 6x6 then he can solve this 34x34.

[@4ddn4mehere]

Make a checkerboard with it

[@margaretlyons8930]

Magnetize it🫠

[@Pepperonimonster]

It would take at least 792 magnets 🫠

[@otavioeletric]

it wuld be crazy, but due to its weight surely requires magnets insanely big compared to the size of pieces.

[@crazylab126]

Need a big ass industrial neodymium magnet

[@blueland42]

The sizes of the corner pieces are just about the same size as a normal 3x3.

[@AWSMcube]

As a speedcuber of 7 years, I can testify that this feat is spectacular and magnificent. Bravo

[@ivan_was_taken]

and this is why companies don't sell anything bigger than the 21x21

[@HusnaFerdous-nt7sx]

Is soup timmy your friend Lol don't ask how I know

[@Conning157]

Imagine accidentally scrambling it trying to make a checkerboard pattern

[@ManiTheObbyist]

how would you even mess up the checkerboard pattern

[@Conning157]

@@ManiTheObbyist its much harder on even layered cubes. You have to do something different. Especially tryna make a checkerboard pattern back to solved.

[@Eden12444]

I can’t even do a pattern on a 5x5 Rubik’s cube😅

[@suspicioussand]

Me: struggles with a 3x3 Internet people:

[@cubermason8594]

And then flew to Minnesota for Nationals?

[@01tristan5]

It’s all funand games until you drop it

[@ytuser4562]

But… why though? That much time and plastic for something no one will use

[@quartzninja]

The same reason any cube higher than a 5x5 gets made. Because it's interesting to see if you can, and because there's always the chance that someone is gonna want to try and solve it.

[@StephenWamweya-t3y]

that thing's nutz bro..❤😂😮🎉

[@Zep_Zar]

imagine if he got the colour scheme wrong 💀💀💀

[@swify_tv6743]

Great! now make a 100x100 Cube 😅

[@mnemonichotpocket]

No. Just no. Too much cube. Too much rubix.

[@PrasadNagare-q8y]

We have higher degrees but less common sense

[@MRHunianimation]

Rubik's cube is Hungarian!😎

[@ZanizainebZanizaineb]

How many peoples want to solve it😢😢😢

[@MonicaKikaClaudya]

At least the sides are correct

[@TeijeWillemsen]

I bet you you dont dare to make a 100 x 100

[@WyvernOfHadesYT2021]

200k Likes and he will solve it

[@Zesty_medly]

That is one C H O N K Y cube

[@NotScotishYellow]

Bro you gotta notice that this look like 5 months, MASSIVE W jus5 give him a break

[@axolotl_squad_axolotl]

Like if you want him to make a 100 x 100

[@Hodar_3]

Длинна сторон моё почтение 😏👍

[@FerousFolly]

now do superflip pattern

[@dragongamerandart]

So who wants to make a 35 x 35?

[@BLP_Memes]

Note: That’s over 150 millitresquinquagintaquadringentillion (1.50 * 10^4358) combinations!

[@Voyage_13]

Why u look like johnny sins

[@ThatTrendHouse]

Freind comes over ( scrambled 34x34 in hand): Solve it

[@memesparody1867]

lets see someone speed run that

[@xXIronPeachesXx]

Why does his gigantic 3d printed cacophony of squares still turn easier than EVERY OTHER REGULAR RUBIKS CUBE?!

[@Vishupa]

That’s a Masterpiece ❤

[@LuXX-GAMING]

Calculating the number of combinations for a 37x37 Rubik's cube involves a complex mathematical process due to the vast number of possible states each piece of the cube can be in. The combinatorial explosion makes it a significantly larger problem than the more familiar 3x3 Rubik's cube. To simplify the explanation, let’s break it down into the types of pieces on the cube and their respective permutations and orientations: 1. **Centers**: For a 37x37 cube, the center pieces are those that do not move relative to each other. The center piece configurations are generally fixed, and for a 37x37 cube, each face has a large number of center pieces but they are identical and do not rotate, so they do not add to the complexity in terms of orientation. 2. **Edges**: The 37x37 cube has many edge pieces. Each face will have \( (37 - 2) \times 4 = 140 \) edges, considering the pieces on the edges of the face minus the corners. Thus, there are a total of \( 140 \times 6 = 840 \) edges, but since each edge is shared between two faces, we divide by 2 to get 420 unique edge pieces. Each edge piece has 2 possible orientations. 3. **Corners**: Each corner piece can be placed in one of 8 positions and can be oriented in 3 possible ways. However, since this is a higher-order cube, the edge pieces will be more numerous. The formula for calculating the total number of combinations is significantly more complex due to these high-order cubes, but an approximate formula can be derived from the factorial function that accounts for the permutation of the edge and corner pieces and their orientations. The formula for the combination count in such a cube involves: \[ N = \frac{(number\,of\,edge\,pieces)! \times (number\,of\,corner\,pieces)! \times (number\,of\,center\,pieces)!}{symmetry\,factor} \] However, exact combinatorial calculations also require accounting for orientation restrictions (e.g., only an even number of edge flips is allowed) and the indistinguishability of similar center pieces on such a large cube. Given the enormity of the number, it is easier to use an estimate based on smaller-order cubes. The total number of possible configurations for a 3x3 cube is about \( 4.3 \times 10^{19} \), and this number grows exponentially with the order of the cube. For large cubes like a 37x37, the number of combinations is truly astronomical, often written in terms of powers of 10. To provide a rough estimate without diving into detailed mathematical combinatorics, the number of combinations for a 37x37 Rubik's cube is far greater than \( 10^{1000} \), reflecting the immense complexity of such a puzzle. In conclusion, while the exact number of combinations is extremely difficult to calculate precisely due to the enormous size and combinatorial complexity, it is safe to say that the number is beyond human comprehension and far exceeds typical large numbers used in everyday contexts.

[@almeidajonathan42]

It's amazing what humans are able to achieve with access to money and free time.

[@drakemcfee9138]

Indeed and a factory of high end printers

[@giannax5645]

I was just thinking "do people enjoy wasting time or?"

[@boombomb2257]

My favorite rule

[@MapSecrets23]

Here's how many pieces there are Corners: 8 Edges: 384 Centres: 6,144 "Stickers" even though it's stickerless: 6,936 Pieces not including sticers: 6,536

[@nojena37]

Bro: "let's make a massive rubics cube!" - Some months later - Bro: "yey! Time to do the assembly process!" Also bro: "let's do a stop motion video as well!" - one eternity later - Bro: "damn, I wasted so much time on that video. But it was fun!"

[@digitalRat88]

People in 20th century: wow, future is so mysterious, wonder what things people'll do Meanwhile the future: giant Rubik's cube

[@blekitYT]

i think if he scrambles it, then he will solve it in two days Me: I cant solve an 10 cube😢 Him: the frickin 23x23 cube for 1000$ (i dont know the price, im polish, i know that in PLN its 4.5 / 5 thousand) isnt enough, MORE POWEEER 😎😎😎

[@JoshtheA1x]

Blue Mountain Mystery??? Is that gonna be the next movie remake? Spatter and Dodge have got to be my favorites in this movie. I’m just wondering how they got to see Talyllyn.

[@maxifire32]

Now make a 64x64 cube

[@shadowboy2452_2]

Now, make a 50x50 rubik's cube Only do it when this video gets 200K or 250K likes or this comment 1K or more likes

[@dominik7206]

Now imagine the amount of work that guy had to invest into building this crazy challenging construction... with over 4000 faces.... And he has like 20k subscribers (at least this video has a million clicks)... and then there are channels where some stupid young girls eat yoghurt or whatever and such channels have 1000 times the amount of subscriptions...

[@davidchalmers6753]

Umm. 98 pounds is movable by hand. Theres jobs where moving shit over 100 pounds occurs more than once every 5 minutes...

[@BR-jw7pm]

I’ve seen some mad creations but this takes the cake! If you DON’T become famous for building this, that would be tragic!

[@DUOLINGO-s9u]

now give it to Caseoh.

[@jonasg5898]

"Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn't Stop To Think If They Should"

[@user-sathz]

Finals ? It's ok. Your bank account gets hacked ? It's fine. You're stuck in the middle of the ocean ? No probs. Having to solve that cube, is the most terrifying thing that will exist in the entire universe.

[@caioxlive1318]

Man, scramble it and use an IA to solve it. Because of that, you can copy the solve and you'll have the World Record of 34x34 to yourself

[@papasalvo]

"To heavy to lift by hand" NONSENSE hit the gym and work on tour Zercher squats and deadlifts i believe in u

[@trinhhuyvinhbao670]

He even trapped a Demon Core inside to enhance the efficency and less heavier when rotating it! 10/10 Update: my friend accientally dropped it one day and crack open the Demon core. He's not so good right now, I gotta give it a 2/10 safety.