Bulova Lunar Pilot - Review (96K111 43mm)

Welcome all Wrists!
Welcome to another review! In this video I take a look at the Bulova Lunar Pilot, specifically, the 43mm version 96K111.
SUBSCRIBE: / @welcomewrist
Instagram: @welcome.wrist / welcome.wrist
Patreon: patreon.com/WelcomeWrist?utm_...
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 Overview
0:37 Dimensions and Specs
0:57 Dial
2:55 Bezel and Crystal
3:29 Case
4:34 Bracelet
5:57 On Wrist
7:25 Movement
8:07 Final Thoughts
#Bulova #Watch #Review

[@ronc2430]

Let’s gooo been waiting for this one since the comparison vid

[@welcomewrist]

Thanks for waiting, I hope you enjoy the video

[@brunorocha1704]

Excellent video!

[@AccentBwoy]

Got this off Amazon used good condition etc. Bulova my favourite watch brand

[@pearlflubber]

Great review!

[@welcomewrist]

Thank you!

[@WH250398]

You have a very good voice for these kind of video's.

[@welcomewrist]

I appreciate the kind words!

[@blackhawk5950]

First things first: I love this watch and good video. Having said that, I can not understand how so many videos insist on the theory about the Speedmaster broke on the moon. The Speedmaster did not brake on the moon, and I think it would be a good idea to do a good research - and to dive into 'the non official history' - before making a video like this. It's pretty obvious that Dave was paid to bring not other item but a watch (and not any watch but the one that was competing against the Speedmaster), just when the Speedmaster's plexi 'accidentally' poped out.

[@joselaboy2435]

The dial is so elegant

[@welcomewrist]

Its very nicely done from Bulova

[@watchbydesign6214]

A good review but one correction, the 3 o'clock sub dial rotates once per second and with 20 tick marks this makes it a 1/20th of a second dial and NOT a 1/10th of a second dial. I've owned two BLPs and the hand can and will stop at any of the 20 tick marks.

[@einfranke677]

Cool watch, cool review 👍! Think I'll go for it. By the way I prefer non tapering bracelets. Tapering down to 18 or 16mm looks too feminine in my eyes. Cheers, Frank

[@welcomewrist]

Its a fantastic timepiece! Fair point, no taper definitely gives it a more masculine look.

[@BiffTannenBTTF]

Nice. Wonder why they didn't do a bead blasted case like the original.

[@welcomewrist]

I also thought the same. Maybe they wanted to have a point of difference between this and the original.

[@einfranke677]

The polished case appears smaller than a blasted one.

[@welcomewrist]

@@einfranke677 Yep, the polished case does make it appear smaller

[@watchbydesign6214]

I've owned both and the three-finish case [bead blasted case, brushed bezel and polished pushers] of the original just looked bad [to me]. I now wear the fully polished 45mm model on my 7.6"/19.4cm diameter wrist, and it looks great. Obviously Bulova thought the same as they've made the 43.5mm new version [same size as the "one off" original] with a polished case.

[@Panzekorp]

No date.......with date under the dial

[@vali69]

That sounds untrue... Either way are you buying a chronograph watch or a highly complicated watch? This is why I don't like the prospex speedtimer, this bulova's direct competitor, besides the date one of the subdials is actually a 24 hour subdial. Like so pointlessly cluttered.

[@danielwalt3677]

The reduced size is a step in the right direction

[@welcomewrist]

I agree, makes it much more wearable