Diversity should never mean hiring unqualified employees to meet the requirements. It just hurts everyone in the end. Talent should always be given priority
@bobblue_west2 жыл бұрын
(Talent should always be given priority) Man you're radical. An unskilledphobe for sure.
@nameisamine2 жыл бұрын
They care about *profits*. That’s McKinsey study showed more diverse workplaces were likely to be more profitable. Did you not see that part of the video?
@truperb34152 жыл бұрын
"Talent Is Equally Distributed, But Opportunity Is Not."
@dennisholliday24542 жыл бұрын
@@truperb3415 So true , so true...they like to say there is a lack of talent but the reality is not everyone is given the same opportunities
@tomnguyen85462 жыл бұрын
Meritocracy
@rando420692 жыл бұрын
The woke businesses I've heard about generally do better than when they didn't practice what they preached.
@charmerci Жыл бұрын
Geez, how well did Anheiser-Busch do by trying to be "inclusive"?
@deeksha11412 жыл бұрын
Being "woke" is looking moral not actually being moral
@TuEIite2 жыл бұрын
And I suppose you are the one who determines what "being moral" is ?
@marwazein72832 жыл бұрын
Well said!
@Mokkel732 жыл бұрын
Being woke and being socially responsible is two different things nowadays. Wokeness are just privileged bullies.
@duality55032 жыл бұрын
Woke= moral narcissists who bully people with different opinions.... Also the idiological decendants of mass genocidal Communists.
@benb35002 жыл бұрын
@@duality5503Nothing wrong with different ideas. The problem is bullying with baseless accusations that shut down arguments (racist,sexist etc.)
@nancyferrier86092 жыл бұрын
@@duality5503 Typical bullying response, ironically. Exactly how are you being bullied? By people asking you to be marginally socially responsible?
@duality55032 жыл бұрын
@@nancyferrier8609 We need to remember the far left murdered around 100 million in the 20th century, these people also believed absolutely they were moral people on the side of the workers and anybody who disagreed was evil, sometimes open debate it's vital it dosent matter how entrenched one position is, it dosent mean they have got it right.
@s2korpionic2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Exactly.
@weareallbrainwashed51012 жыл бұрын
I don’t even buy Nike, or coke anymore. Adidas isn’t woke, and water bottle isn’t.
@ryans16232 жыл бұрын
Yeah have not bought nike or coke or gillette for years now, you don't insult your customers.
@nefertitib43132 жыл бұрын
Coke should go bankrupt. So unhealthy, causing obesity selling empty calories. The most disgusting thing ever.
@yamaneko64032 жыл бұрын
@@nefertitib4313 dude it‘s tasty so idgf
@varghesekm2 жыл бұрын
@@yamaneko6403 g ib
@kaym77042 жыл бұрын
I just bought a pair of Nike sneakers...love them.
@Avengerie2 жыл бұрын
They can start their journey of being socially responsible by paying their taxes.
@mat37142 жыл бұрын
Yup
@Marinealver2 жыл бұрын
They don't need to work, They have Woke
@TuEIite2 жыл бұрын
@@xdrowssap4456 rofl
@asheru92542 жыл бұрын
Yes that part
@mmoarchives25422 жыл бұрын
they do pay taxes, however, politicians are basically forcing companies to pay less taxes with massive tax cuts so they themselves don't have to pay taxes, in the corporate world, it's only a few bad apples that avoids paying taxes like oil companies, apple, and GM
@the-based-jew68722 жыл бұрын
The saying is 'go woke go broke' Becuase people don't need woke bs.
@TheArctofireHD2 жыл бұрын
I wish people would separate environmentalism from woke. All it does is make conservatives turn against action on climate change. I fully support being eco-friendly but not this obsession with political correctness.
@Pyovali2 жыл бұрын
ESG should just be E. Companies shouldn't be ones to try to solve social issues
@Atombender2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, there's nothing "woke" about reducing energy consumption and carbon footprints. Not comparable to diversity hires.
@pranays Жыл бұрын
So just let them keep being rascist so don't use woke? Mighty white of you.
@pranays Жыл бұрын
@@Pyovalilow IQ comment rascist they are the employers if they don't change then people of color continue to be poisoned and discriminated against. So much low IQ rascist comments from you losers.
@Tenchinu2 жыл бұрын
Why does it matter how ‘woke’ or ‘green’ a company is, when the overseas chain of manufacturing is not regulated to respect environmental and humanitarian rights?
@ChrisBrown-hr6mc2 жыл бұрын
It’s all about smashing small business and making everyone a low wage worker
@nightskyft2 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Just look at where we are with rubber. Then remember, it's really every major industry.
@salokin30872 жыл бұрын
Did you not watch the video?
@ImAHusband8092 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this comment.
@AshikJonathan2 жыл бұрын
So that governments can go for war
@SamBankman-Fried2 жыл бұрын
I wish they wouldn't conflate woke with climate change action. The former is some recent BS spouted by the easily offended whereas the latter is a genuine issue.
@vladniculae61142 жыл бұрын
Word.
@marksittner6022 жыл бұрын
But this is actually their strategy, to conflate and intertwine, so nothing could be really achieved. Basic CIA training.
@raquetdude2 жыл бұрын
Well rightwingers hate both and its sold as the same thing to them by their news networks.
@charissam30482 жыл бұрын
Just because it’s recent to you (and mainstream media) doesn’t mean it’s a recent term. It’s been around since 40s- civil rights era meaning be awake to the unreported effects of injustice (in those days it was lynching, housing discrimination, CIA tracking activists like MLK etc) So companies having to be ‘awake’ to the wider effects of their profit seeking is actually correct in the true sense of the word.
@TuEIite2 жыл бұрын
You can assign what you want to a word, clearly they are using the word woke to group climate action, sustainability, and social issues.
@lypdmaxpane2 жыл бұрын
I wish I lived in the 80's where I don't have to see this weird BS, when time were a bit simplier
@CAL-jj4om2 жыл бұрын
A company using cameras & AI to identify employees who violate spacing or masks is not a positive thing as presented here.
@rdean1502 жыл бұрын
Yeah that was a weird and troubling example. I imagine they were just trying to shoehorn in AI because it's a hot tech right now, and they had to try to find an example of machine learning used for a socially conscious purpose, and the timely Covid angle was too tempting to pass up. They definitely should have passed it up. I would not work anywhere that tracked me with CCTV and AI everywhere I went with the explicit purpose of catching me doing something wrong so they could punish me.
@CatsInHats-S.CrouchingTiger2 жыл бұрын
It’s a way of finding out if details can affect outcomes. A virus can devastate the operations of a company. Why would that be wrong to protect the employees and the company. It’s mutually beneficial.
@dainaa_d2 жыл бұрын
@@CatsInHats-S.CrouchingTiger But using cameras and tracking employees their whole working day is just excessive, it is highly controlling. Absolutely unnecessary
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
It is not wrong if companies themselves, and not the government, choose to find out details that affect outcomes. If spying on employees is not beneficial to them, they, in turn, may make the choice to leave, and go elsewhere to work in places where their freedom to move about is more respected.
@angliccivilization13462 жыл бұрын
In the end, the American consumer still shows shopping patterns of wanting the cheapest product. There might be public discourse and people's opinion on surveys claiming to want sustainable products and such, but consumer purchasing choices show those claims to be falsehoods.
@LIFEwithBAVAN2 жыл бұрын
True- can't have it both ways. Especially with this "transitionary" inflation and supply chain concerns
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
You can always get consumers to say what you want them to say, and what you want to hear from them. That doesn't mean that is what consumers themselves actually do.
@linahidayat99102 жыл бұрын
@@LIFEwithBAVAN ..
@linahidayat99102 жыл бұрын
. . .. . ....
@dwiadriani80602 жыл бұрын
@@LIFEwithBAVAN y Yuk==L=;bvw6
@raquetdude2 жыл бұрын
social responsibility but don’t allow unions wow how progressive
@Cr4y7-AegisInquisitor2 жыл бұрын
Wow... George Orwell is turning in his grave
@iankamau2222 жыл бұрын
the fact that those judges still wear those silly wigs is hilarious
@User-cb4jm2 жыл бұрын
The real comment here.
@uknowamsaying2 жыл бұрын
The film did not mention a lot about the real **Go woke and go broke** . The real woke issues are transgenderism, homosexuality, pronouns, feminism and racial diversity. The film only addressed the fifth, which is the most widely amiable one to people. When companies go broke from being woke is usually due to the first three. This is a poor and disappointing video!
@Quasar_Squawk2 жыл бұрын
Obviously The Economist is not what it used to be. But wow... The mental gymnastics for this story is astounding.
@FatRonaldo12 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t mind companies having principles, but what infuriates people is when companies use pinkwashing where it suits them, but keep quiet as a church mouse when it goes against the bottom line
@carpo7192 жыл бұрын
BOOM. Exactly. Nike has no interest in 'just doing the right thing' they used colin for profits. This kind of woke is a joke. I suppose they will move their manufacturing facilities to the US, and pay fair wages? Is it woke to use child labor?
@1112viggo2 жыл бұрын
Any company will do or say whatever they judge will be best for the bottom line, that is always their only principle.
@nicob41152 жыл бұрын
@@1112viggo exactly they are clever and exploit these absurd social movements. And it works!
@MrARock0012 жыл бұрын
They're all rapidly discovering that it's extremely cheap to claim they have values. Pay attention only to what profits they're willing to sacrifice to live up to their values.
@ssuwandi32402 жыл бұрын
Its always the brainwashing only benefits the greed 1%. Unless you never live and brearhe in one of Satanist Globalist- same cults who dare for hunting the children for decades.. Check out the pictures hanging in the office of previous Nike CEO.. beyond disgusting!
@marksittner6022 жыл бұрын
Diversity does not bring creativity. Who invented this notion.
@dirtyminerapparel2 жыл бұрын
Companies should stay out of politics. Focus on products, services and innovation. Build better teams and listen to what employees want and need to succeed. Today many want a better work life balance. Healthcare is highly important and so is mental health. It’s always sad to see a company that gave huge executive bonuses reaching into the 10s of millions while laying off workforce. Who’s more important? Companies need to adopt an employee first attitude because the engineer you just let go might be the one who would have innovated and helped pioneer a new product. Just my thoughts.
@ViktorScberg2 жыл бұрын
Go woke or go broke?. Nope it's Go woke Go broke
@canemcave2 жыл бұрын
I guess the economist will go broke soon
@thomastheram53312 жыл бұрын
Become awake not woke! Woke is more controlled opposition!
@XOPOIIIO2 жыл бұрын
You can't solve the unequality problem unless you discover it's cause. Not the most optimistic hypothesis but real cause.
@kiwikiwi24832 жыл бұрын
Well if we go to the root, it's about treating one different because they look and/or are different.
@XOPOIIIO2 жыл бұрын
@@kiwikiwi2483 Or it could be not.
@kiwikiwi24832 жыл бұрын
@@XOPOIIIO And you know this how?
@XOPOIIIO2 жыл бұрын
@@kiwikiwi2483 I don't know, that is why I said it could. Why do you know it's about what you said?
@johnnastrom94002 жыл бұрын
@@kiwikiwi2483 "And you know this how?" -- You are the one who made the claim that the cause was because people who look different are treated differently and you made the claim with no proof. If you were honest with yourself, you would point out the variances in academic performance among different ethnic groups. Your performance in school is a great indicator of how well you will do in the professional world.
@snorfallupagus60142 жыл бұрын
I cancelled my Economist subscription years ago and my profits have skyrocketed ever since.
@Jake-pf4kv2 жыл бұрын
brought to you by the oil industry
@ssuwandi32402 жыл бұрын
So true. All these Cultural Revolution for Saudis ROI. What a dastards!
@ouahibazerrouak49092 жыл бұрын
@@Jake-pf4kv opkagrwqw Wa 3alaikom eslem
@waliddjema54422 жыл бұрын
yep, let's hire people based on their skin color/gender because that's what MLK wanted after all...
@jonl88162 жыл бұрын
Those people who weren't hired and discriminated against due to their skin color/gender. All they wanted was a fair shot, and not implicit bias. That's what people want.
@waliddjema54422 жыл бұрын
@@jonl8816 I got denied a scholarship because I wasn't black nor a female! What about my fair shot??
@terranamber2 жыл бұрын
@@waliddjema5442 So you can't compete with your peers? Stop whinning and man up.
@andreas01012 жыл бұрын
@@terranamber Are you dense? It's wamen and pepul of color who can't compete. It's kind of the whole point.
@waliddjema54422 жыл бұрын
@@terranamber huh? They literally only take blacks and females.. Also 13/56 could be why there is less representation
@snehashispanda48082 жыл бұрын
Diversity affects Asian students who are meritorious and hard working culture.
@DarrenHughes-Hybrid2 жыл бұрын
I'm sure you misquoted on purpose, but just in case it's an accident, it's "Go Woke AND Go Broke!" Your video is propaganda (and I fully expect this comment to be deleted), you're trying to convince everyone that Wokism is the right way to go. But argue with me or not, the proof is in the pudding and time will prove my version correct.
@chorleycc2 жыл бұрын
Should be illegal. Diversity hiring is illegal discrimination - change my mind. Cheers
@bgiv20102 жыл бұрын
The Economist just spent a lot of productive energy not just saying that US capitalism is so racist and ecologically negligent that it had to wait until not being that way proved to be profitable for decades before updating practices across the economy.
@raybod17752 жыл бұрын
Sounds like you’re judging the U.S. economy from 50 years ago. Try joining the world of what’s happening now. Most goods sold in the U.S. are made in China. Most people who are poor in the U.S are White. The most financially successful groups are from Asia. Success comes from education, figuring out and fulfilling the needs of the economy, working harder than most people and taking chances.
@rajendratayya84002 жыл бұрын
Always follow the man at the centre.
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
I don't look at who works at a company, I look at what I want to buy and whether the store has it. It doesn't matter to me if they are all white or all black. If people do not want to shop in an all white store, please move on. If they do not want to shop in an all-black store, please move on. One of the nice things about owning your own business in the United States is that you can pick and choose the people you want to work there. It is MY business who i hire. If the customer is not happy with the employees that I choose, then they should not be shopping in my store.
@kelleysaint86062 жыл бұрын
This is how I think also ,
@Ricksblitz42 жыл бұрын
Globalism is never the answer. In order to care about the world, share profits, become more environmental friendly a company must create value and profit or there are no resources to make things better. A company must care about their consumers and adding value, their employees and adding value and their profit- all three of these legs of the Business triangle must appreciate and work synergistically with the other, or there is no business, no profit, no value and no chance to increase the standard of living, protect the environment and produce more efficiently and cleanly and share those resources with others. The standard of living, health resources and the poverty level across the globe has never been in better shape historically and this is due to capitalism, value added, the leisure and know how to share and continually strive for cleaner and greener production. The markets due this naturally. People know there is only one planet and we need to respect and honor it, those companies who are rogue and take and don’t give value go bankrupt and cease to exist. We can never lose sight of adding value and creating wealth and profits or we become like state owned pre-planned communist/socialist nations where things fall into disrepair, no wealth or value is created, technology stalls and the environment suffers as a result.
@markgreen62292 жыл бұрын
Hey! How do we lower emissions? I know! Fly a plane.
@ChrisShannon2 жыл бұрын
Look at Alberta's oil and gas sector being so environmentally ethical. Now, they're looking for their own methane gas leaks. All these years they didn't even care to monitor for such large leaks?
@TuEIite2 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisShannon To an extent but definitely less so as externalities were less financialised and less attributable in the past.
@danliddiard2 жыл бұрын
It's go woke, go broke. Nice try Economist. However I do love a cleaner environment.
@rdean1502 жыл бұрын
Then you seem to have a confused understanding of the term "woke". Climate consciousness and sustainability are social responsibilities. Being woke just means being aware of such social responsibilities and trying to achieve them.
@bobblue_west2 жыл бұрын
@@rdean150 (It's go woke, go broke. Nice try Economist) Correct. I did a double take on the title incase I'd read it wrong.
@johnnastrom94002 жыл бұрын
@@rdean150 No. It is a lot more than that. Wokeness involves teaching nonsense like "white privilege".
@luiscastrokerdel2 жыл бұрын
2 Things: 1) Are companies really paying less attention to profit and more to diversity, social responsibility and climate change? or, because their customers are now more into these things, they embrace the issues too? That way they can sell more...and, make profit. 2) Can The Economist define what "diversity" is? I am very interested in the the Mckinsey study quoted. According to this research, diverse management in companies outperform non-diverse teams (I think they said, by 30%). If every single person on earth is different, how come a team (a group of people) be less or more diverse ? How do you measure diversity?
@fernthao2 жыл бұрын
they said ethnically diverse, so i guess it's measured upon cultural backgrounds, etc. every single person on earth is different, but generally you could say the difference between two average French white male is smaller than the difference between an average French white male and an average Kenyan black woman, for example.
@rogerbennett96412 жыл бұрын
@@fernthao It's so difficult for oligarchies to construct a society which will never threaten their hold on power, Orwell thought it might be achieved in 1984 which was a tad optimistic middle of this century looks much more likely.
@Pashavizl2 жыл бұрын
Also in big IT or finance, carmaking, global giant corporations, I think they try to hire candidates with better skills, experience and academic performance and since we're living in a global world now we've got a global competition for a vacancies in this companies, so it might be possible to have better results or performance. The question is what kind of companies did this survey observed, how did they measured them. If its only intellectual sector then it could be true, but there are so many companies and fields that imho they can't state this or if they do, they should go deeper, tell at least few more sentences
@zaskiaputri77002 жыл бұрын
6p
@bartvonboberstein82992 жыл бұрын
This is important to help visible minorities, refugees etc. But honestly also if you are white, educated but for example eastern European you are discriminated and no one never ever talks about that because these people are optically not diverse enough to benefit the business...(image, policies, marketing etc.)
@skylineXpert2 жыл бұрын
If that one person purchased a product then he would be a number. But if that product is labelled with something that doesnt interest him or anger him then he would move away from that and find a new
@ikahandayani34272 жыл бұрын
@@skylineXpert Untuk L Di 0 L L L
@ikahandayani34272 жыл бұрын
L L Di 0 L L L L
@ikahandayani34272 жыл бұрын
@@skylineXpert L
@ikahandayani34272 жыл бұрын
@@skylineXpert L L
@14loosecannon2 жыл бұрын
The social responsibility described in this video is becoming increasingly important for companies, but that's distinguished from "wokeness" as far as that term is popularly understood in the English speaking world. Wokeness used to be well intentioned and brought to light a lot of injustices in society, but now that movement has largely become illiberal, intolerant and irrational.
@duality55032 жыл бұрын
Wokists are the idiological decendants of mass genocidal Communists who murdered around 100 million in the 20th century while claiming to be on the side of the poor.
@rdean1502 жыл бұрын
Actually the term "woke" is now used in the same way that "fake news" or "election integrity" are used. As dog whistles to rile up right wingers and justify hypocritical, antisocial, and/or corrupt behavior by conservatives. It is the weaponization of the language used to point out right wing failures into an attack on their opponents and justification for further wrongdoing. It is genuinely orwellian because it robs society of words that would otherwise condemn the right wing, poisoning those words and twisting social discourse for the worse.
@ackomanah64862 жыл бұрын
I am an investor and I don't care about so called "Social Responsibility". I got a taste of it and NO THANKS
@bkup13322 жыл бұрын
Go woke and go broke. That's why we cancelled Disney, for example.
@jumbolarge1082 жыл бұрын
13:09 “She’ll make someone a lot of money”.. orr she’ll make herself a lot of money 🙄
@TuEIite2 жыл бұрын
Both aren't mutually exclusive.
@XXPanayisXX2 жыл бұрын
Many people still see through this oligarchical totalitarian BS.
@alexandrerichard60572 жыл бұрын
That part where they tried to convince us that we lost faith in govs and hoped CEOs would step in when govs fail was hilarious. Ok, Neoliberal
@winstonvpeloso2 жыл бұрын
🤷♂️survey results are what they are
@Pcarnevaaa2 жыл бұрын
Yeah bs
@lahabitaciondelatrapado46212 жыл бұрын
Governents will succeed. We have so brilliant leaders... One after the other they are always improving, I can't wait to see the next genius to come into power.
Just make corporation’s pay their fair share in taxes! The people should control what social priorities the government should have.
@AniMageNeBy2 жыл бұрын
I would rather have the reverse, and make it so all people only have to pay what companies do!
@lahabitaciondelatrapado46212 жыл бұрын
Who decides what is a "fair share"? Is it 20%, 50%, 100%? Is a politician who never lived out of their own sweat the one to decide that? Can you have a democracy without demagogues? Does government spending curb the fact that taxation is a violation of property rights? There's a whole philosophical debate behind "their fair share" that's not being adressed, but you know, slogans are made for being easy to repeat and not to engage in deep thinking.
@royrogers31332 жыл бұрын
You want to pay corrupt politicians more?
@danbuckley71282 жыл бұрын
Get woke Go broke...Netflix ...Disney tip of the iceberg Yes and men Cant have a period @the Economist
@CheeseBae2 жыл бұрын
In the end companies don't actually care about social causes, just the perception that they do. Kind of like all the corporate support of BLM while they still prop up the genocide and camps in China. Corporations calculate the cost of supporting a cause versus the benefit. It's not coming from a place of morality but a place of economics.
@damianm-nordhorn1162 жыл бұрын
8:37 obviously CCTV+software doesn't solve the problem of people not wearing masks correctly.
@chriskay38252 жыл бұрын
if you want to get employed, then be prepared to give up your privacy.
@Dragosteaa2 жыл бұрын
Diversity, equity and inclusion are nice values.. when they aren’t being crammed down peoples throats whenever convenient for hypocrites
@thedamnedatheist2 жыл бұрын
While you keep peddling the line that companies primary responsibility is to shareholders unchallenged & say nothing about responsibility to society in general it excuses the actions which have caused the problems we have today. Profit isn't the bottom line, a functioning society is.
@TheMagicofJava2 жыл бұрын
It's all about raising the barriers to entry maintaining the oligopolistic positions of large corporations.
@jimmyliu46142 жыл бұрын
As a consumer, I also hope the products can be more reliable and endurable, so we can produce less carbon emissions and wastes.
@asimpleman64642 жыл бұрын
They won't make endurable products which lasts long because it can cause economic depression because if the things you buy doesn't stop working you won't buy a new one which would limit the flow of money.
@hurrdurrmurrgurr2 жыл бұрын
@@asimpleman6464 Hello, broken window fallacy.
@ryans16232 жыл бұрын
@@asimpleman6464 Seem to work in the 50s to 2000s things were made to last.
@bgiv20102 жыл бұрын
Disposables and planned obsolescence were a very profitable scam
@someguynamedsteve2032 жыл бұрын
@@asimpleman6464 so what are planet won't last long with it's infection Of humanity
@dainaa_d2 жыл бұрын
The part where they were talking about the company using AI to keep employees 'safe'. This is absolutely insane and excessive, I'm scared for the future..
@HH-xs2gm2 жыл бұрын
It’s not excessive. We don’t human trafficking in the supply chain. And technology plays a huge role in identifying that.
@galiaazougagh58432 жыл бұрын
G Yrjt
@galiaazougagh58432 жыл бұрын
Ñosijo
@sasmitagobel12712 жыл бұрын
@@HH-xs2gm magic of
@loejan58162 жыл бұрын
@@HH-xs2gm oke
@raptorhunter55492 жыл бұрын
Here's an idea let's get a carbon tax we have an addiction to gas when we could be cleaner and more substantial
@terranamber2 жыл бұрын
You almost got the title right, but anyway it is confirmed that you either 'go woke or go broke'.
@XXPanayisXX2 жыл бұрын
Is woke synonymous with brainwashed?
@MikhailKolodin2 жыл бұрын
yes
@modern_eel2 жыл бұрын
Its very telling that "shareholders" are talked about as a different class of human than "workers". As if the two have nothing in common. The shift in company habits is really just reflecting the gentle overthrow of "shareholders" with the common needs of all people on earth.
@bgiv20102 жыл бұрын
Yes! We are the stakeholders! The workers are vital. Capital investment is not really a risk deserving of reward (profits and ownership).
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
Shareholders own the companies that, in turn create the jobs that people go to every day. If large corporations had no shareholders, jobs would be few and far between. Of course, some of us want us to go back to the Middle Ages, too, but I am not one of them.
@modern_eel2 жыл бұрын
@@purplenights1 The Middle ages, and feudalism were indeed awful. Glad we're on the same page. Shareholders hold identical roles to Feudal Lords. Lords worked their serfs, and cut them a meager living slice of the profit, and lent no contribution to society but their "ownership". My hope is to one day stamp out the backwards remnants of feudalism from our society.
@bgiv20102 жыл бұрын
@@purplenights1 that's like saying, when there's a natural disaster, no one will help anyone bc no one specifically invested capital to create the "job" of helping people. Jobs are not only (or even mainly) created by shareholders. The sooner we learn that, the sooner we'll be free of oligarchs. Maybe we don't need "large corporations"?
@pepps7792 жыл бұрын
I agree it is rather indicative of an overthrow, and the issue comes with the assumed beneficial conclusion of such an action. The 'needs' of all the people on Earth are diverse, not common. It is the age old conundrum that has a leader trying to satisfy everyone, and satisfying no one in the end. Not to mention, overtly bringing private entities into the realm of the state is not novel, and, regardless of intention, it only ends up going in one direction. A state controlled economy, which is an environment that harms workers more than any other.
@studsy672 жыл бұрын
Go woke go broke
@edricaldones96392 жыл бұрын
Hasn't happened, won't happen. At least not to big companies.
@pastaferian57982 жыл бұрын
@@edricaldones9639 Gollette lost a billion over a single wk ad. Hollywood is losing billions for their wk propaganda
@carlosreid512 жыл бұрын
lets go brandon sounds great too
@edricaldones96392 жыл бұрын
@@carlosreid51 To utter imbeciles, yes.
@celicacelica12 жыл бұрын
"the benifits of diversity are more innovation (innovative thinking)" how? In a country that is predominantly white, where predominantly men are competing for high earning positions, thanks to hypergamy, it's reasonable that most of those positions will be held by white men. Companies don't care about diversity, they care about profit and if appearing to care about diversity is better for profit, then they will pretend to care about diversity. The argument for, forced gender and racial diversity quotas being a way to tap into innovative thinking is not only BS, but racist and sexist. Preferential hiring is not fair, no matter what. Saying that people with different skin colour or gender will think differently is exactly what woke culture is saying does not happen. So much so, that today, we are not even allowed to recognise the difference between genders by using gender pronouns. When you apply for a company that advertises the fact that it employs 50% women and has over 50% women in management but you get passed over for a job by a woman who's linked in profile shows you she is way less qualified than you, should you think, well maybe her news agent job and unrelated course will give the company more innovation than my years experience in the field(sales) and 3rd level RELATED deploma.
@TSDamiano2 жыл бұрын
Progressive companies in the us But in china strangely they are no longer "Woke"
@aintnoslice34222 жыл бұрын
10:30 this seems to say alot more about the actions of black people than the prejudices of the justices system
@goodluck56422 жыл бұрын
Hush
@eufefo2 жыл бұрын
this is the beginning of the end of capitalism. bonne chance a tous ;)
@bobwinner89362 жыл бұрын
No mention of gillette's monumental marketing own-goal?
@PHRCpvh2 жыл бұрын
ESG: A facade that makes you thing the world is changing for the better, when actually they don't give a f#$@ 'cuz there is a lot of dirt hidden beneath.
@Mevlinous2 жыл бұрын
Exactly, ESG is a smokescreen, like throwing a few scraps to the dogs as a diversion. It is token moralism.
@jesusrocks1412 жыл бұрын
Sad to see Faber ousted from Danone, really going in the wrong direction
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
I didn't think young people in their 30's could do a lot of saving since they have to pay off these massive student loans. So which is it?
@mattbarbarich32952 жыл бұрын
Don't you mean "Go Woke, Go Broke" cos that's what usually happens. People are getting tired of the B/s.
@morenitomoreno12822 жыл бұрын
lol it’s not happening. Conservatives just made this up to cope. Perfect example is Nike endorsing Kaepernick. It actually helped the companies bottom like. The right has lost the culture war ages ago
@mattbarbarich32952 жыл бұрын
@@morenitomoreno1282 In your dreams.
@toby99992 жыл бұрын
I wish.
@ChrisShannon2 жыл бұрын
The footage of the plane flying over the town in Alberta at 3:19 is flipped (left and right). It's Cochrane, Alberta. Anyone have any idea on why they would do that? I have some theories: It was using a GoPro or a front facing camera that was used for a video conference previously, and has it set to look like a mirror. Video editors are trained to have vehicles go from left to right because that's kind of how cars normally travel. That's how reading works. It was stock footage from someone else. It was a conspiracy to troll me and waste hours of my time trying to find this on Google Maps.
@MrARock0012 жыл бұрын
Waiting for capitalism to solve the problems capitalism created is madness.
@Khadijalidaji2 жыл бұрын
♥️👍💐🤝😂salam
@ahrenadams2 жыл бұрын
What is amazing is this can all be solved if we treat the actual cause. Greed
@swallowedinthesea112 жыл бұрын
You can't treat greed. It's been here since the dawn of man.
@johnnastrom94002 жыл бұрын
Your idea is rather simplistic.
@ahrenadams2 жыл бұрын
@@johnnastrom9400 only man thinks the answer always needs to be complicated for it to have weight
@rosomak-ns4tb Жыл бұрын
But greed also has its cause those are the systems that make it so the most greedy people are the most successful and have the most power
@kennethkueh12562 жыл бұрын
Woke show
@thewolfofswingthat20352 жыл бұрын
17:00 China did not threaten to ban the brand, the consumers decided to exercise their consumer right to not use their brand , there is a massive difference and you conveniently mix those two together.
@happycanadas2 жыл бұрын
Go woke go broke
@QBlessed932 жыл бұрын
Woke = Broke
@billymauch45252 жыл бұрын
*Get woke go broke. Fixed it.
@Sam-xy9pu2 жыл бұрын
They are trying hard to shift the narrative here with this propaganda piece by pretending they dont know what the real phrase is. Kind of disgusting to see the media doing this everywhere.
@queency79342 жыл бұрын
Great context. Everyone needs more than there salary to be financially stable. The best thing to do with your money is to invest it rightly, Because money left for savings always end up used with no returns..
@Jennifer-bm9un2 жыл бұрын
Same here, I made $12,400 profits on investing since I started trading with Burton Schilchter his trading strategies are too notch am winning consistently trading with him. He's really the best broker, I've made a lot of profit investing with him.
@garyjacob11452 жыл бұрын
I trade with him, The profit are secured and over a 100% return on investment directly sent to your wallet.
@Matt-oe7jy2 жыл бұрын
😭 I've seen a lot of recommendation about Mr Burton Schilchter, Please can I have his info? I want to invest 2,000usd with him.
@christophernelon47862 жыл бұрын
I made $13,542 with Burton Schilchter After my 15 business days of trading I got my profit directly sent to my wallet.
@getinthespace7715 Жыл бұрын
I've been saving cash and am buying property and building a house this year. I'll build an ICF house on 10-20 acres. House should last 100 years, build it with no maintenance fire resistant exterior, ultra energy efficient, out in the country away from all the stupidity. Grow and can food like my grandparents did.
@vipjoel12 жыл бұрын
Companies go where the money is. Right now there is a pissload of money in ESG
@12oshinko2 жыл бұрын
Personally, I always try to prioritize B Corporations.
@mmoarchives25422 жыл бұрын
LOL i see the economist saw someone say "go woke go broke" and used it in this title not knowing any meaning behind it to use it correctly
@p.emmanuel1894 Жыл бұрын
Obsession for political correctness in the Anglo-Saxon word is just disgusting. Justifying surveillance in the work place, raced/gender-based hiring...what is the next?
@hjs9td2 жыл бұрын
Companies make for lousy monasteries.
@Zajcooo2 жыл бұрын
it's go woke -> go broke, not or
@Bittruth2 жыл бұрын
That took them a whole night to make that title
@lindakelly9250 Жыл бұрын
This is not a true report. Looking at all the companies and that are having diversity that's great they did in the past it's the same. They say they're green or Eco friendly that isn't the truth either they're doing the business the same way they were before maybe cutting back on a little bit paper items or things like that this is all Bad for the diversity because it's not teaching us all to get along it's causing more trouble between everyone. It's bad for the environment because they're saying anyone can say Eco friendly and it's not.
@paulkiel56132 жыл бұрын
ugh. what an awful piece. Come on economist. "cuddly"? you have to be kidding. You explain this issue entirely about values, and perceptions to customers. Feelings. When will you talk about this in economic terms? Pushing your pollution onto others (or other generations) is in effect socialism. Externalities in economics. When you get to push your company's externalities onto other people, of course your profits will be boosted. This movement is about taking personal and economic responsibility for the consequences of your economic activity. It isn't about "cuddly" or "woke". its about economics. Responsibility. Externalities. And subsidizing companies who can dump their waste on other people against their will. By framing this as a woke issue, you mock the economics.
@felox692 жыл бұрын
This video is totally bias. I had Disney and Netflix in my portfolio until they start making low quality woke movies and series. Not because I don't like it. Is because that product don't sell. Dislike 👎
@chuchaichu2 жыл бұрын
Chinese here. The Economist sounds more and more like the state-owned media Chinese CCTV. No stats, a lot of emotion, and only showing hand picked interviewees to represent the handpicked truth. This is not journalism, this is salesmanship.
@karenfreeman16012 жыл бұрын
All you need to do is take that penalty of selling the treasury. I suggest investing in ones own country. Each country has all there own resources needed and wars are unfortunate. Almost any investment over 10 percent is a huge winner 20 percent go go go.
@fenlandwildlifeclips2 жыл бұрын
I don't understand what Woke culture is. The explanations I've seen say it's communism, but you say it's cuddly capatalism? Can you please explain what woke means in simple terms?
@nicholaslowick33812 жыл бұрын
My understanding is it’s basically just an attempt to empathise with marginalised people and to try to be conscious of how your actions and implicit biases harm them. Also I think a big part is attempting to hold people to the same standard which is where ‘cancel culture’ comes in. But ‘corporate wokeness’ is essentially companies pandering to this crowd in an attempt to get them to buy from them I.e. ‘speak with you wallet’ but it’s all virtue signaling and most companies do not live up to what their professed values are. Idk if this is right but it’s just how I see ‘wokeness’.
@johnnastrom94002 жыл бұрын
Wokeness involves the identity politics nonsense along with preaching equity (equal outcome).
@bennybelton7092 жыл бұрын
Happy workers are definitely an important factor in business!
@purplenights12 жыл бұрын
I do not care about a worker's "happiness". If they are unhappy with their job, then they should move elsewhere so they can be happy. I look for motivation and investment in their work experience. I don't pay people to come to work as a form of entertainment.
@AliCan-jj3ez2 жыл бұрын
Mungkin agar orang kristen jgn menista agama islam x tapi orang islam bebas menista mungkin begitu biarkan sajalah kita sdh tau jd serahin saja sama hakim yg adil . To ada waktunya klo kita bahas juga ga guna .cuma cape doang . Hakim yg adil ya Tuhan yesus dia yg akan menghakimi semua orang kemudian ✝️❤🙏
@Juliapak2 жыл бұрын
reality is you have no business without the environment!!
@ogChaaka2 жыл бұрын
It's not go woke OR go broke Its get woke, go broke. The first causes the second.
@entertainmentguys12 жыл бұрын
Workplaces need to be effective and useful. I don’t need to work in a hugbox, I need utility. I need an environment that fosters creativity and competence. When I want things to be inclusive and welcoming, I’ll hang out with my friends or S.O.
@PHlophe2 жыл бұрын
nobody wants to hug you at work anyway. and we are all in an assembly line. if you want to be creative and a free thinker then you can have that space with your friends.
@swallowedinthesea112 жыл бұрын
Start your own business then.
@entertainmentguys12 жыл бұрын
@@swallowedinthesea11 Somebody needs a safe space......
@swallowedinthesea112 жыл бұрын
@@entertainmentguys1 IKR!
@lemonsavery2 жыл бұрын
13:07 "She looks [quite promising], and hopefully will make someone a lot of money." That thinking felt gross.
@abhishanu12 жыл бұрын
Why? Isn't that what a job is? You are creating value which is equal to money.