𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞, 𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐲, 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 by Apostle Pastor Gino Jennings

[@torrierhodes4030]

I separated from my husband 7years ago. I since then believe what the bible says and have came back to my husband. We are together and even though it's not easy. I would give up my marriage for the world .Pastor Jennings thank you for this much needed message on marriage. People don't realize how serious it is in God's eyes ❤

[@sicelomasuku5554]

My wife left me and I'm prepared to stay single until God convince her coz of God's truth

[@Gabyrock89]

Brother you're in my prayers ​@@sicelomasuku5554

[@Gabyrock89]

​@@sicelomasuku5554brother you're in my prayers.

[@TheTaurel]

@@sicelomasuku5554 The New Testament teaches that if a mate becomes one flesh Sexually with someone else outside of the marriage, and there is no reconciliation possible with this individual, the innocent party is not obligated to sit and hope or wait for them to return. They are free and not condemned by God if a divorce takes place and they re-marry - Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 are both about married people and not this twisted false nonsense taught - that Jesus was directing this to those who are espoused or engaged to be married. The New Testament Greek word Porneia Matthew used to state Jesus' position means more than just Fornication; But covers ALL Sexual sins involving the genitals outside of marriage - including ADULTERY. So if you and her can reconcile Wonderful and best wishes. But if she is not open to do so and at some point takes up sexually with someone else (even an animal), you have the choice to sit and hope she returns - but you are NOT obligated to. You can move on and find a new mate to be happy with.

[@JayBeenCbosen]

@@sicelomasuku5554Amen brother and God bless you.

[@ofinnie]

I LOVE TRUTH..

[@zeerie7521]

I agree with the scriptures and thank you Pastor for explaining. God's word stand.

[@jpduster1]

If you agree with the scripture. Explain this: Jesus 5:17 Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them. God gave Moses the Law. So if the law, given to Moses by God, allowed and gave specific instructions on how to divorce, why would you agree that divorce is not permissible?

[@TheTaurel]

Agreeing with Scriptures is good when it's being preached accurately. But this is not the case with him on this matter - he is horrendously misleading people and altering their lives with this falsehood ; Because the true teaching of the Bible for Christ's followers has always been this one thing alone: 'If your mate has sexual relations or intercourse, outside of the marriage, Jesus said you can divorce them and remarry.' Because Porneia, was the original word he mentioned there in the New Testament Greek, not fornication at Matthew 19:9 - means more than just fornication single people do. It also covers Adultery and Homosexuality among other sexual sins. Look it up for yourself in any lexicon of the New Testament - the word was Porneia and it meant a lot more than fornication only.

[@laidback1.0.1.2]

​@@TheTaurel Ok so I see you error, so let help you. The only reason given to divorce a wife is because she has become one flesh with a man before she has become one flesh with her husband. I hope this helps you

[@TheTaurel]

@@laidback1.0.1.2 "Give me chapter and verse for this supposed "clarity" you showed me. - because frankly it makes no sense with regard to MARRIED people Jesus and the Pharisees were discussing.

[@laidback1.0.1.2]

@@TheTaurel Could divorce be for adultery Lev 20:10 .... the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. Could divorce be for laying with an animal Ex 22:19 Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death. I hope this helps you

[@grant2149]

Facts💯

[@edoboramos467]

Amen

[@nicolemartin-pz1wl]

AMEN 🙌🏾

[@Caleb-Numbers14-24]

Ppl of God, you all have to cultivate a relationship with the God of the universe. You have to learn scripture for yourself, you have to make prayer a necessity that is an unbreakable habit. Fasting has to be a regular part of your lifestyle. Anything and everything you want or need to know as it concerns to you, God WILL reveal it to you. His word said call unto me and I will answer you! That’s a promise. Since social media everyone and anybody has a platform to say what they want. It’s dangerous for a believer that lacks biblical knowledge. Very dangerous. The Bible says my ppl perish for a lack of knowledge. Ppl quoting scripture without a relationship with the father. And claiming biblical superiority without ever experiencing God. Those who have a relationship or an experience are called the remnant and they pray more than they speak. 🙏🏾♥️…if I need to know something I go to my father. I sit at the feet of Jesus to hear the heart of the Father. ❤…and then He may use men/women of God to confirm His word. But I know his voice so I know when it’s a confirmation, rebuke or edification for me from Him. ♥️🙏🏾

[@Jesusisking3733]

This is all I got to say Jesus greatest commandment is to love your neighbor as urself, ur neighbor is also the person u intertwine with when u said I do to death due us apart. When ppl say I do ppl got to remember, life n death is in the power of the tongue. So them vows is supposed to be serious. God love us so much he was married to the backslider. God love is so unconditional, we suppose to take after his likeness and our love for our spouse should be unconditional too. So how can you love your “neighbor” who is also ur wife n throw in the towel when things get shakey. Then on top of that get remarried when Jesus said stay unmarried or reconcile. That why Jesus said take heed to your spirit. Malachi 2:15-16. Then we preach all the time our spirit bear witness with the Holy Spirit. Romans 8:16. Well The Holy Spirit doesn’t speak on his own authority, & he guides us into all truth. He listen to what Jesus says first. Then speaks to us what is known from what Jesus had said. John 16:13-15.

[@richardgonzalez6583]

Perfect no pastor wants to teach the truth all modern day pastors avoid this topic like a virus

[@TheTaurel]

@@richardgonzalez6583 NOT TRUE MR. RICHARD GONZALEZ.... ...I am one among many ministers in modern times who are not 'avoiding this like a virus'. From our standpoint & very versed in Scripture and Biblical history we can discern if he is teaching truth or error. So I will respond and lay out similar facts that I've already done on many posts to individuals. My goal is not to upset but aquatint folks with the truth - so their lives are not needlessly altered because of an error. First of all as recorded at both Mark 10:1-12 & Matthew 19:1-9, the Pharisees challenged Jesus on this subject of marriage & divorce and they quoted from Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which is clearly only about married people. Jesus then responded quoting from parts of Genesis, in particular Genesis 2:24 - which is also clearly about married people. So they were obviously on the same page of understanding and talking about the same thing. Then Jesus goes on to tell them why Moses allowed them to divorce for all of the reasons they were used to because of the hard heartedness of these Jews. Then he, Jesus, goes on to say, 'But I say to you, whoever divorces a wife except it be for sexual infidelity and married someone else is guilty of Adultery'. Notice how contrary to what some other ministers wrongly says, Jesus DID NOT say a divorce and remarriage can't be obtained - instead he said it can be if the divorce was the result of just ONE THING - sexual unfaithfulness or Adultery. Jesus is here contrasting his new superior standard to that of Moses old one, which allowed a divorce and remarriage for any number of multiple reasons. Jesus was there narrowing it down now to there being only ONE REASON allowed to divorce and re-marry - instead of multiple reasons. It is pure nonsense and false to teach Jesus was there at Matthew 19:9 suddenly talking about espoused or engaged couples, who in Bible times were considered in title only - husband and wife, like Joseph and Mary. Again starting from verses 1 down at Matthew 19 - the debate was about people fully and completely married as both their Scriptural references from Deuteronomy & Genesis make clear. To reason as this minister does that the verse is directed to single people who are engaged, because the King James Bible used the word Fornication, really demonstrates a very shallow knowledge of his or deliberate ignorance on what the original Greek New Testament word Matthew used was - Porneia, not our English word Fornication as rendered in older translations like King James. They didn't have much knowledge on how extensive and broad that word was outside of Fornication or Prostitution. Matthew's gospel, just like all of the rest of the New Testament was written in Greek, not old King James style English. He NEVER used the word Fornication, but instead the Greek word Porneia to state Jesus' position. Why is this important? Because Porneia was used back in Jesus and the Apostles day to refer to more than just Fornication or Prostitution - but also Lesbianism, Pedophilia, Incest, Homosexuality, Beastiality, and Adultery. It was the word that covered A L L SEXUAL SINS OUTSIDE OF THE MARRIAGE BED. Adultery again among them. This is not difficult to look up and find out, any good word for word Biblical Lexicon of each Scriptural versed will show this. But MORE SIGNIFICANTLY the Bible shows some examples of how the word Porneia was originally used to describe sordid sexual situations that were in no way simply Fornication, as wrongly translated at times in versions like old King James. But involved Lesbianism, Adultery, Incest and Homosexuality - Romans 1:26-29/ 1Corinthians 5:1/ Jude 7. These Sexual sins are NOT in anyway Fornication as wrong rendered in older translation because of limited understanding of Porneia back when compiled ; But are usually no longer rendered as such in the New King James Bible and others - which will say something like Sexual Uncleanness, Immorality, Unfaithfulness etc etc. Because those expressions match the proper use of Porneia in such Biblical places - where Fornications rendering in those three Scriptures at Romans, 1Corinthians and Jude is Ridiculous. So contrary to Mr. Jennings or others reasoning that the verse at Matthew 19:9 is aimed at engaged to be married couples - he is completely wrong, the word Porneia was used there, a well as Matthew 5:31,32 towards those who are fully and completely married, not espoused or betrothed (engaged). So Jesus was saying that if your mate is guilty of ANY OF THESE SEXUAL SINS - he and God does tolerate a person to seek a divorce, if they can't reconcile with the Adulterous mate for whatever reason. And they are free to re-marry if they choose too. This is an exception allowed to the Apostle Paul's statements in chapters 7 of both Romans and 1Corinthians about how, 'the law binds a husband and a wife together for life unless death frees one to remarry'. This is an exception to that for now - besides as Paul also mentioned some cases of not being 'bound under obligation to a mate that had completely abandoned the marriage'. Adultery of Any direct kind involving the genitals with the opposite sex, same sex, with an animal etc etc are all legitimate Scriptural Ground for divorce and Remarriage - nothing else as Jesus pointed out to the Pharisees. Understand Marks account of this same debate, as well as Luke's brief statement at Luke 16:18, not adding the sexual basis in detail as Matthew account did must be understood in harmony with Matthews UNABBREVIATED and Complete statement of Jesus' position. Or else Jesus teaching on this is a big contradiction: in one place saying it is ok to divorce on a particular basis infidelity & then turning around and saying one can not at all. Which would be a confused contradictory mess. Knowing this truth and realizing the error being taught by either this minister Gino Jennings and others, will hopefully free some from the needless Unscriptural guilt they have had placed on themselves, who are in a new marriage after an legitimate Adulterous divorce ; Or others who have been told they must break up a new marriage, even with kid, and either go back to the former mate or stay single & wait for them to die to remarry. Or still others who properly divorced on Scriptural grounds of Adultery (Porneia), then later had an opportunity to re-marry someone else who would be good to them - but turned it down because they'd been misled by these ministers to believe they'd be in error before God. Many commenting how they've altered their lives in making this decision for not just a few years but DECADES. And the truth is they were all MISLEAD either by Gino Jennings or some other minister on this matter - and that's completely AWFUL ! So contrary to what you thought, there ARE ministers who will not avoid this subject like virus or plague.

[@ladyrob4110]

No, you cannot divorce...you can separate.

[@TheTaurel]

@@ladyrob4110 No you're incorrect: The Bible teaches you can divorce an Adulterous mate and re-marry - Matthew 5:31,32 & 19:9. Don't be fooled into be believing those verses are talking about espoused or engaged couples - because they are not directed to them. But instead married people.

[@JoseChrystalRomero]

I am to be married to a man who has been divorced.it's my first time will we be in sin ?

[@The_Devil_is_Real_1992]

Yes you will be a fornicator and he would be an adulterer so the best thing to do is let God lead your husband to you and when he come he won't be married you would be his first wife and he will be your first husband. God bless you sister on your journey hope you made the right decision and put your pride aside and be humble in the face of the Lord.

[@TaviyaBarrette]

Yes, you will be in adultery my dear! That man is still bound to his wife as long as she is still living

[@Hallaneious]

It really depends on what his grounds for divorce were. If this man is divorced as a result of Adultery in his former marriage, your marrying him will be ok. I know that certain ministers, like Gino Jennings, teach that Adultery is not a justification for divorce and remarriage. But he and all are completely WRONG. The Bible does allow this one exception. Allow me please to explain. Gino Jennings has on occasion acknowledged that he doesn't really care about the original languages the Bible was written in ( old testament: Hebrew, Aramaic, and new:Greek ). And not giving attention to that is partly why he teaches this false doctrine of no divorce on the grounds of Adultery. Both Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:9 did NOT use the word Fornication originally - the Greek word PORNEIA was recorded by Matthew in stating Jesus' position for his followers. Many years ago at the time the King James Bible and others were compiled, they knew very little about how broad in meaning that word PORNEIA was. They only knew it to refer to either Prostitution or Fornication - and translated it as Fornication generally. But since that time there's been much research and documented proof of how broad in meaning PORNEIA was used in the days of Jesus and his Apostles. This was a word that referred to ALL KINDS of sexual sins involving the genitals with another living being OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE. Be it in the form of Homosexuality, Beastiality, Incest, Pedophilia, Fornication, Prostitution or ADULTERY. That was the original Greek word Matthew used in recording Jesus' position. And for this reason modern translations such as even the New King James Version that's been updated for no longer say Fornication in those places - but instead something like "Sexually immoral" or "Sexual Immorality" - because those expressions are more in line with the broad meaning of PORNEIA. This is proven not just in the every day documented writings of that time period - but more significantly in The Bible itself. Here are some examples: at 1st CORINTHIANS 5:1 the Apostle Paul chastised the Corinthian Church for tolerating a man who is having sex with his mother or stepmother, because she was his "father's wife" Now his status as married or single is not disclosed there - but in describing this sordid sexual mess Paul used the Greek word PORNEIA, not simply Fornication as wrongly translated in old Bibles. And that's more appropriate because the woman was definitely an Adulterous in cheating on her husband with his son and be it blood kin or not - it was still considered incest in those days. Also at Jude verse 7 the main reason for the destruction by Jehovah God of Sodom and Gomorrah is described using that original Greek word of PORNEIA. And rightly so because though there were obviously sexual unions between men and women, since the Bible at Genesis 19:4-9 speaks of "young boys to old men" demanding Righteous Lot send out the two male visitors in his home so they could perform Homosexual sex on them and even worse on Lot himself. Obviously the young boys definitely were not the result of men having anal sex with each other. But Jesus' younger brother Jude used that word PORNEIA to describe the entire sexual depravity of these people from their Fornication to Bisexual and Homosexuality. So again modern translations knowing the broadness of that word PORNEIA used there at Jude 7, no longer say Fornication but Sexual Immorality instead to cover it all. So when Matthew recorded Jesus' position in using that word: it meant any kind of sexual union between people's or with an animal outside of marriage - and Adultery is just that - outside of marriage. Gino Jennings wrongly tells folks that Matthew 19:9 is about single people "espoused" or engaged to be married, like was the case of Joseph and Mary - considered husband and wife - but in title only. But his interpretation of Matthew 19:9 is FLAWED AND WRONG. If you look at the verses before 9, starting at verse #1, you see the Pharisees are debating with Jesus as to 'whether it's ok for a man to divorce his wife on any and every grounds he wants to'. And that they were talking to Jesus about, not the "espoused" or engaged type of husband & wife, but those who were FULLY MARRIED couples is seen from there quoting DEUTERONOMY 24:1-4 - which is completely about married people living in the same house as husband and wife having sex and an official document of written divorce is involved. Jesus responds to them in understanding where they are coming from by using the Scripture at Genesis 2:24 which speaks of 'a person LEAVING their parents home to be with the marriage mate and having sex to be one flesh together'. The point is this: both Jesus and the Pharisees were talking about fully married people not the engaged to be kind of husband and wife. So when Jesus goes on to say 'Moses allowed all this divorcing on any grounds out of your hard heartedness - but he, Jesus, would only allow it on the basis of 1 exception of PORNEIA - Jesus was clearly contrasting his superior rule for his followers to Moses old standard. That was obviously a continuation of what Jesus and the Pharisees were already discussing fully married people. Jesus was not suddenly jumping off the subject matter of fully married couples to discuss single engaged couples as Gino Jennings wrongly assets because of his ignorance to the meaning of PORNEIA Matthew used. Lastly, Gino often quotes Mark 10:11-12 out of context to make his point that divorce and remarriage is forbidden. But he fails to realize this is the same occasion of the Pharisees challenging Jesus as Matthew recorded at Matthew 19:1-9. If you go back to Mark 10:1-12 it's obvious. So to understand Jesus' position, you must put these two passages together. Mark was not as detailed as Matthew was and only concentrated on the 'don't divorce' aspect of Jesus' remarks whereas Matthew was more detailed and mentioned how PORNEIA is the one exceptional ground for divorce and remarriage. So is the case with Luke 16:18 - it must be understood in light of Jesus' complete position stated at both Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 - or else his words are a complete confusing contradiction - and that's not possible. So yes as Paul pointed out in Corinthians and Romans, a husband or wife are supposed to be bound together for life and not to remarry, unless death comes to one, freeing the other to remarry ; but Adultery (PORNEIA) is the one exceptional ground - you can't overlook that. This has been a lot to say to you, but it was necessary. I have written many responses to this false doctrine Gino Jennings and other ministers like him have promoted because of comments of people like yours. Or others who have been shamed to believe they're living in sin being married to a divorced person and going to destruction or "hell" - even if Adultery was the basis for divorce and remarriage. Or others who have not remarried because of this wrong teaching. Some have even left a new family with children. Still others think they have to wait for the former mate to die or they must go back to this person. All completely ridiculous and UNSCRIPTURAL. So you must determine if this man is divorced after sexual relations took place at any point outside his marriage. And there was obviously no reconciliation with his former mate. In such a case you are not wrong to marry him. Gino Jennings calling you a 'hoe" or "harlot" based on his reading from an UNINSPIRED APOCRYPHAL BOOK that teaches that - is a complete contradiction to the authentic other 66 INSPIRED Scriptures. Best wishes to you and please don't be so hasty to let this man go without first thoroughly investigating this matter...🙏🤗

[@The_Devil_is_Real_1992]

@@Hallaneious just answer this question fornication is when you're having sex without being married right ? how can a married man fornicate make sure you have the holy Spirit before you try to break down scripture how can a married man fornicate.

[@Hallaneious]

​@@TaviyaBarrette Not necessarily so "my dear". If there was the sin of Adultery in that marriage and he divorced, as a result of no reconciliation, she is not wrong to marry him. The problem here is some ministers like Gino Jennings fail to realize or deliberately ignore that Jesus did not originally use the limited word of Fornication at both Matthew 5:32 & 19:9. The original Greek new testament word Matthew used was PORNEIA. It meant back then and still today: 'ANY AND ALL SEXUAL contact between humans and animals OUTSIDE of marriage. It was used to refer to Homosexuality, Adultery, Fornication, Pedophilia, Incest, Prostitution. Adultery is obviously outside of marriage and a Scriptural basis for a divorce and remarriage. So because of not appreciating this true meaning of the word PORNEIA, Mr. Jennings has y'all wrongly believing Jesus was referring to "espoused" or engaged couples, who in Israelite culture were considered husband and wife as Joseph and Mary were. Older Bible translations like the original King James knew very little about how broad in meaning that word was and translated it as Prostitution or Fornication. But scholars have overwhelming evidence now that it refers to much more than simply Fornication and now translate it appropriately as "sexual Immorality" ; Even the updated New King James Version does this as well. However he is completely wrong to assert Matthew 19:9 is about engaged couples. Just go back and read from verse 1 on ; The Pharisees are asking Jesus this on the basis of quoting DEUTERONOMY 24:1-4 which say: 'If a man takes a woman as his wife AND MARRIES HER, and in their home he finds uncleanness with her, he could give her an official written document of divorce and send her out of his home. She now could legally become another man's wife living in his home - and he could do the same of divorcing her. But according to their God Jehovah, she could not go back to the 1st husband after being sexually involved with the 2nd husband.' This is about fully married people not the engaged. Jesus clearly understood this and he too quoted Genesis 2:24 back to them which is about fully married people because it says: 'For this reason a man will LEAVE his father and mother to stick to his wife and become ONE FLESH with her [sexually]. So then when Jesus goes on to say Moses' old rule in allowing divorcing on any grounds out of their hard heartedness would no longer be the case ; because Jesus would only allow it on one exceptional ground of PORNEIA, Clearly he was contrasting his new rule to Moses' - a continuation of the subject of married people not the engaged as Gino Jennings wrongly asserts. Jesus was not suddenly jumping off talking about married couples as those two Scriptures they both used are referring to ; Matthew 19:9 is ferering to fully Married folks. Another error Gino Jennings makes is quoting Mark 10:11&12 or Luke 16:18 out of the context of Jesus' full statement on this as recorded twice at Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. Mark 10:1-12 is the exact same occasion of the Pharisees challenging Jesus on this matter. The only difference is Mark didn't concentrate on adding the detailed part about PORNEIA as Matthew did. And so is the case with Luke 16:18. You have to understand them in harmony with Jesus' complete position at Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 - or else the Lord's words on the subject are a complete contradiction. Adultery of any kind involving the genitals directly or rawly is a Scriptural basis for divorce and remarriage. God does not consider that marriage as legitimate and that person still your "living mate" as Gino Jennings wrongly states. If Adultery/PORNEIA was involved - they are now your Former husband or wife.

[@denitto19]

I wanna get reconciled if I just can't marry

[@Hallaneious]

Hopefully you can get reconciled. But if not, and your mate has gone off and started a sexual union with someone else - Scripturally you do have the right to divorce them and remarry again. Gino Jennings is twisting and reading his own false narrative into this. Because at both Matthew 5:32 and 19:9, which was originally recorded in Greek, Matthew used the word PORNEIA to make Jesus' point. That word back then and still today does not simply mean Fornication - that's incorrect ; PORNEIA covers or stands for Adultery, Beastiality, Incest, Homosexuality, Prostitution and Pedophilia. His not acknowledging this is how he has misled many to believe that it's wrong to divorce and remarry on the grounds of Adultery (PORNEIA) of any kind. Modern Bible Translators know this better than many years ago, and generally 95% render Scriptures like Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 as something like "Sexual Unfaithfulness" or "Sexual Immorality" etc - to reflect more accurately the original Greek word PORNEIA Matthew, Paul and other New testament writers used. This conversation with the Pharisees Jesus was having had nothing to do with people who were "espoused" or engaged to be married - but instead those who are Married already. So best wishes to you if your former mate doesn't reconcile with you - but understand, The true teaching of The Bible is that Adultery IIIIIIIIIlSSSSSS a Scriptural grounds for divorce and remarriage. You do not have to remain alone if you choose not to as time goes on - and you'd NOOOOOT be condemned by GOD if you did remarry later in the future. On this point Gino Jennings is just what he likes to call other ministers in their Errors - he is "A Liiiiiiiiar !"

[@roscoes9933]

Divorce and Remarriage: Matthew 19:9: Jesus says, "I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." This indicates that if a man divorces his wife for reasons other than sexual immorality and remarries, the new marriage is seen as adulterous in the eyes of God. The sin in this context is the act of divorce and remarriage without just cause. Repentance and Forgiveness: 1 John 1:9: "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." Repentance is essential in Christianity. If the man truly repents, God offers forgiveness. However, repentance would involve acknowledging the wrong and turning away from the sin. Staying in the New Marriage: While the Bible speaks against wrongful divorce and remarriage, there is no specific command that requires a person to leave their new spouse after remarriage, even if the circumstances of that marriage began in sin. If repentance is genuine, it’s often understood that the new marriage should be honored, though the individual must fully repent for the actions that led to the divorce. 1 Corinthians 7:20-24 provides some guidance on this matter, suggesting that after repentance, a person should remain in the situation they are in when called by God: "Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them." In summary, if the man repents sincerely, he can be forgiven, but the sin still carries consequences. The New Testament doesn't demand ending the new marriage but emphasizes the importance of repentance and living in a way that honors God going forward.

[@Sunshine-y9t9r]

@@Hallaneious no where in the Bible it says it’s ok to remarry if your spouse commits adultery tho. It’s ok to get a divorce but not remarry. Please show me where in scripture it says it’s ok to remarry. Bc I’m currently going thru this situation myself and I am married to a man who’s committed adultery.

[@Hallaneious]

@@Sunshine-y9t9r Soooo Sorry for you in this situation, and I will soon respond after I clear up some other serious matters. 🙏But Scripturally you DO have grounds for divorce if you can't reconcile as the innocent party. I will explain shortly with God's word The Bible.

[@lauralogan1896]

@@HallaneiousPlease show scripture that says “innocent party”

[@birdmanbird10]

CAN YOU GIVE ME THE SERMON OR SERVICE NUMBER PLEASE? OR CITY THIS WAS PREACHED IN....I WANT TO LISTEN TO THE ENTIRE SERVICE.

[@Tassy.1k]

Check out main page they have information on the screen

[@PeopleoverInstitutions]

Deuteronomy 22:23-24.....Notice that according to the law, Miriam wouldve had to be stoned NOT just Put away(Divorced). The SAME as an Adulterer John 8:5.

[@sylviaalicea8797]

My husband carries wolf titles. He cheated on me when we was engaged, and after we got married and still continues, but he loves to read the word of God, but it’s not applying it put meat away to the side so what should I do?

[@TheTaurel]

@@sylviaalicea8797 Very sorry for the unfortunate dilemma you find yourself in Miss Sylvia.... Certainly you don't desrve this treatment. So you asked, 'what should you do'? Well I will share some Scriptural points on this matter, which may contradict what you've previously heard or learned. But I encourage you to consider all that is shared with you and imitate Paul who set an example for us in, 'Reasoning on the Scriptures' ; For your own sake mentally, physically and Scripturally - ACTS 17:2. As the Apostle Paul was inspired to write at both 1CORINTHIANS chapter 7 and ROMANS chapter 7 - 'when a man & woman enter marriage it is supposed to be a life long commitment - unless death enters the their lives & breaks that bond & freeing the living to seek another mate' . And this is in harmony with what the lord Jesus told the Pharisees on an occasion of them debating with him on, 'is it alright for a divorce to take place for any and every reason?' - As mentioned at both Matthew 19:1-9 & also at Mark 10:1-12. The only difference is that each Bible writer mentioned something the other didn't - which I will point out - but this is the same occasion. Jesus pointed out to them as Paul stressed, 'It was not suppose to be this way from the beginning [when God united Adam & Eve in marriage], that Divorce was not intended. But with the fall of mankind into sin, temporarily Jesus pointed out that unlike Moses allowing divorce to the hard hearted Jews on any ground, he [Jesus] knowing God's will, shall only permit a divorce on one ground now alone: 'Sexual unfaithfulness' outside of the marriage. Some older translations like the original King James Version used the word Fornication to describe this but Matthew, who was inspired to write Jesus statement, used a Greek word that meant much more than simply Fornication ; And that word was Porneia. In the everyday language of people in Jesus and the Apostles time, Porneia meant 'ANY AND ALL sexual intercourses or sexual gratification of the genitals' outside of the marriage bed. Because sex Scripturally is only approved of by Jehovah God between a married woman and her husband. Beastiality, Fornication, Homosexuality, Incest, Pedophilia, Prostitution and ADULTERY are all under the category of Porneia. And even to this day in the Greek language that word still carries that broad application. And it is from this word we get the modern day words: Pornography & Pornographic - which are all kinds of sexual imagery of sin of all sorts. Years ago when older translations were formed, the knew very little outside of Prostitution and Fornication being part of Porneia's meaning & not the other sexual sins mentioned. Even in God's word the Bible Porneia is was originally used at places like Jude 7 to describe ALL the extreme sexual depravities of Sodom and Gomorrah which included Fornication, lesbianism, Homosexuality, Bisexuality. But not knowing any better until now, older translations called this all just Fornication - which is inaccurate, because a lot more was going on as Genesis 19:4-9 shows how Homosexuality was rampant between these two cities. Also another example is the incestuous sexual relationship that included Adultery was being practiced by a man in the Corinthian church ; and Paul condemned it using that word Porneia to describe this Immorality which was taking place. Again Fornication mentioned in older translations is really not appropriate here - but that was all they knew to call it back then. So nowadays with much more understanding Scholars rightly translate those Scriptures and Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 as "Sexually Immorality" or some similar to express the broadness of what Porneia meant in Jesus' day. So from a Scriptural stand point, if you can't get your husband to stop or he just out right refuses by his behavior - You do have proper Scriptural grounds to divorce him on the grounds of Adultery(Porneia). Yes as Malachi 2:16 states how 'God really does hate a divorcing', however as Jesus pointed out, this is the only one tolerated exception that justifies breaking the bond of marriage, apart from a mate dying. And if you can not reconcile with him, you do have the right to re-marry if you choose too. As I said earlier the accounts if Jesus' debating this matter is at both Matthew 19 & Mark 10 ; the only differences is whereas Mark was detailed to mention Jesus saying a woman could divorce her husband, but he did not emphasize how Adultery (or Porneia) is the only basis for a complete divorce ; But Matthews account did mention Jesus' complete statement - so there is no contradiction in what the lords position is. We must understand Marks account in harmony with Matthews since it's the same occasion; and so is the case with Luke 16:18, look did not emphasize the one and only ground for divorce and remarriage as Matthew wasore detailed to. Those Scriptures at Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 - have nothing to do with couples who were considered husband and wife while they were engaged, as us wrongly taught by some ministers. The debate Jesus had with the Pharisees concerned only fully married men and Women, as both Jesus used Genesis 2:24 to make his point to them, and the Pharisees Deuteronomy 24:1-4, both Scripture are about only married couples - not those who are espoused or engaged to be married. So in closing, best wishes to you Sylvia...., I know you seem to have a good heart & want your husband to be faithful to you. But you must be realistic and understand that anything other than Adultery is only perhaps grounds for separation, as Paul wrote, in the hopes that you can reconcile and if not, remain unmarried. But Adultery is part of Porneia's meaning and is the only ground for divorce and a remarriage to someone else. You must understand this properly, because manybon these channels don't and feel they must remain in an Adulterous marriage with an unfaithful wife or husband, even exposing themselves to life threatening diseases or mental stress - and as I pointed out to you from the Scriptures, that isn't true. Many ministers and others read Scriptures out of context or read more into them and mislead folks with a twisted doctrine on this matter. If you choose to stay in the marriage under those circumstances of his infidelity or decide to call it quits and move on, Jehovah does not condemn you either way. Leaving him would not make you an Adulterous if you remarried because of a divorced Adulterous marriage and he is no longer your "still living mate" - on the contrary he would be your former husband - because you Scripturally have a new proper husband. Take care and best wishes to you in your choosings what to do in prayer and reading on the Scriptures 🙏🙏🤗🙏

[@Hallaneious]

@@sylviaalicea8797 How sad for you right now & I hope God holds you dear and keep you strong and gives you the wisdom to choose wisely. Yes God really does hate a divorce as Malachi pointed out in the old testament. And though the marriage bond is supposed to be for life, unless death happens to one spouse, as Paul pointed out in 1Corinthians 7th chapter and Romans 7th chapter - Jesus added God's allowance for only one other reason, to remarry: If your mate is sexually involved outside the marriage. Matthew wrote Jesus position on that one ground in Greek, as all of the New Testament was written. And at both Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 Jesus said "Porneia" (which includes ALL SEXUAL INTERCOURSES and gratification of the genitals) Outside of marriage is the only one exception God allows for a divorce and remarriage at Matthew 5:32 & 19:9. Don't be misled, Matthew 19:9 is not talking about being engaged to be married couples who are espoused or betrothed - that completely false. It is referencing married people - as the context of Scripture starting at verse 1 shows there at Matthew 19:1-9. So you will have to make a choice at some point: Live with him as an unfaithful husband in mental anguish and even risk of your own health ; Or divorce him and move on and let him go before you are possibly infected with a series of sexually transmitted diseases - some of which are incurable. If he won't stop and you can't reconcile with him - it is not a sin for you to divorce him. And if you choose to remarry later, God does not classify you as an Adulterous under these circumstances as is wrongly taught by some ministers. Homosexuality, Beastiality, Fornication, Prostitution, Incest, Pedophilia and Adultery are all sexual sins that occur outside of the marriage bed - and come under the meaning of that New Testament greek word Porneia, Matthew used in stating Jesus' position. So you must choose what's in your best interest Spiritually, Physically or Mentally. But it is a twisted lie taught by some ministers that Adultery(Porneia) doesn't justify divorce and remarriage - because it does if you can't reconcile.

[@Hallaneious]

@@sylviaalicea8797 Adultery is the only Scriptural grounds to divorce and remarry - Matthew 5:32

[@Hallaneious]

@@sylviaalicea8797 Jesus Made it very clear that unlike Moses who, allowed divorce and remarriage for any and all sorts of reasons, Jesus says he only allows it on ONE GROUND of Sexual infidelity as Adultery -which is what the greek word PORNEIA means there at both Matthew 5:32 & 19:9. Porneia covers ALL SEXUAL ACTIVITIES Outside of marriage of any kind involving the genitals. So if you can't work it out with him that he relents from doing this - you MOST CERTAINLY DO have Scriptural Grounds to divorce the Adulterer. And if you choose to remarry in the future that is also your Scriptural right. If you divorce him, understand the Bible does NOT Teach this foolishness that he is still your living mate. He will be your former husband. Being "Bound" together for life as husband and wife as Paul wrote at 1Corinthians 7 & Romans 7 is how it was intended to be - as Jesus said "from the beginning [when God first instituted marriage]. But God is only temporarily allowing people to divorce and remarry on this one basis only as Jesus pointed out at Matthew 19:1-9. And that whole debate with the Pharisees on this matter had absolutely nothing to do with engaged couples as this minister wrongly teaches. The Scriptures Jesus and the Pharisees quoted each there are from Deuteronomy 24:1-4 & Genesis 2:24. Both of which have nothing to do with engaged couples but only married people. Jesus simply contrasted his new law on how it is to be for his followers as opposed to Moses old law.

[@kalimbaayinde25]

Separate.

[@ewilliams3032]

I know a man that calls himself an apostle and been divorced bout 4 or 5 times .. and a lot of his members left the church after he divorced his wife and married another woman at the church... some said they left because he divorced his wife so he can marry the other woman..... yes he married one of the women from his church..

[@GodsChild1249]

🚨Sad. He's a sinner!

[@km-pire4321]

......Let me.....correction...

[@coachk290]

I love and follow Pastor Gino jennings, but I need more clarification. Were the people condemned because of what Moses allowed. Need scripture for that. He still did not answer the question. If there is cheating in the marriage, is it scripturely okay to divorce. I will still follow Pastor, though.

[@marlonelmorejr5569]

You can seperate not divorce… and stay alone now Jesus your man cause you can’t remarry or fornicate until your husband dies

[@attracta1306]

​@@marlonelmorejr5569 misinformation

[@attracta1306]

No you just need to draw closer to God and open your Bible and study it. And if you don't have one I suggest getting one soon before they ban them.

[@frankmoreno7216]

1 Corinthians 7:39 👈🏼 So you can actually separate is someone is unfaithful but not divorce.

[@Thefaithfighter]

Infidelity isn’t the exception in Matthew 19:9. This is false doctrine. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3OZhZWnh6uai7Msi=J3NT3XbGDT5uK3nE

[@daimeonbutler962]

Qustion please help… My first wife was a college student,at a young age! She married a young African student her same age.He wanted to stay in the USA! & He gave her 10 grand!! They divorced and i came along 2 years later and we married 8 years into our relationship! Long story short……,she left me and took my kids! I have moved on in my life & got married again allmost 10 years after the break up…what does the Holy Word say about my life? & how can i fix this🤷🏽‍♂️

[@jackiejeanphilippe6052]

You can talk to Holly spirit yourself. Pray fasting.

[@laidback1.0.1.2]

Ok so here's the thing Had you divorced her you would be the cause of her committing adultery. You can take another wife, but she can't take another husband and if she does it would be adultery You can move on with your new wife with no sin committed, but your not suppose to take back your ex once she's defiled

[@enokelole1864]

I really wish he would explain the true definition of fornication vs adultery. Fornication is mentioned in Matthew because Matthew who's a Jew himself understands Jewish laws and is writing this towards Jewish people & wasn't meant for the Gentiles. In Jewish tradtion, the woman being married for the first time (must be a virgin) if she's not, then she would be guilty of fornication(having sex prior to marrying). Plain & simple, single people fornicate & only married people commit adultery. Both are sins in Gods eyes.

[@ThomasBotos]

Well what about Deuteronomy 22:13 and why is Deuteronomy 24 so diffrent?

[@TheTaurel]

@@ThomasBotos Deuteronomy 22:13-21 is dealing with a man who comes to hate an innocent legitimate wife by falsely insisting she was not a virgin when after marrying her, there was no evidence of her being a virgin - as she produced no blood upon being penetrated by him as the 1st man. And it has to be adjudicated before the Israelite officials with proof and punishment & financial penalties; for the lying husband ; Or sever punishment of death to her if she did falsely present herself as a virgin - while engaged to him living in her parents home. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 is a different situation all together that doesn't result in anyone paying out money or being disciplines because of hating his wife for something unclean about her. Nor is the woman sentenced to death; but instead given a legal document of divorce freeing her go become another man's legal wife.

[@sicelomasuku5554]

But what if your wife left u for onother man can u marry..

[@TheTaurel]

@@sicelomasuku5554 Scripturally yes you can divorce that adulterer and re-marry. Jesus pointed this out at Matthew 5:31,32 & 19:9. Those verses are not directed at engaged couples, as some ministers wrongly teach. But instead to married couples.

[@ewilliams3032]

What if the first wife dies years later after that person was married to the 2nd wife... does that make the marriage to the 2nd wife right ? Or the 2nd marriage doesn't count? And the man can marry a 3rd wife the 2nd wife is still a live and she went and married again.

[@JC-tx3gh]

If your wife was STILL alive when you married your second wife, that is NOT marriage for you were ONE FLESH with your deceased. You have been living in ADULTERY and need to come out of it now! I highly recommend submitting your flesh to JESUS CHRIST before ever considering remarrying since you are a widow now. Take care

[@princeplayzytp7345]

Of to go back to the pastor to confirm your marriage

[@ewilliams3032]

@@princeplayzytp7345 ok... I was talking bout my sister's husband she was the first wife but she passed away year later. Dude left his 2nd wife and married a 3rd .. his 2nd wife didn't want to remarried because she had got saved doing the marriage so she felt it was wrong for her to marry another man. But I told her that her marriage didn't count because when she first got married.. her husband still had a living wife his first marriage which was my sister... so her marriage was void .... She finally got married again to a pastor.

[@attracta1306]

Ok so you can only divorce your "fiancee" if they are unfaithful because technically its two different types of spouses in the Bible. Listen the Word of God is not that complicated especially if you are filled with the Holy Spirit. God is not the author of confusion.(1 Cor 14:33) PLEASE ready and study the Word of God yourself! This is his way of justifying what he said about woman is bound to man until death...well ladies their is a way out of a marriage and unfaithfulness is one of them. O and 2 facts about me before you stone me. I've never been married. And I'm FOR this Pastor. I appreciate him because we don't have teaching like this anymore. And just an fyi there are still preachers who preach the word of God without watering it.

[@richardgonzalez6583]

There’s a difference between divorce and remarriage people get the two twisted you could only get remarried if your original spouse is dead and you better find someone who has never been married or there original spouse is dead as well if not your screwed

[@laidback1.0.1.2]

When can a man divorce his wife? Deut 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and 👉married her....

[@SeanJames-v7y]

if the man who marries the woman that is put away, was not himself married does he commit fornication or is the marriage good and lawful?!

[@BL-pv7et]

What about the man is there anything thats giving him instructions on not putting away his wife?

[@TheTaurel]

@@BL-pv7et Yes there it is right there at both Matthew 5:32 & 19:9. Jesus said "Porneia" (which is the original New Testament word in the Greek language it was written in, not King James Bible English). That words meaning in those verses covers any and all sexual activities outside of marriage like: Adultery, Incest, Pedophilia, Fornication, Bestiality, Homosexuality, Prostitution). It has a broader application in the scriptures than just Fornication alone all the time - as some wrongly assert. If your mate is guilty of any of these sexual sins, that come under the meaning of "Porneia" & you have scriptural ground to divorce and re-marry - if there's no reconciliation possible. But that's the only exception. As Paul pointed out in Romans and 1Corinthians, 'Married people are bound together for life unless one dies - freeing the other to re-marry if they choose too'. However another other exception is again sexual unfaithfulness or Adultery (Porneia). Without that, he (or she) is not to put their mate away. Jesus' words there at Matthew 19:9 were not directed at engaged people but married couples. Because if you look at the entire context of the verses, at verse 1 on down there at Matthew 19:1-9 - The Pharisees and Jesus are quoting scriptures to each other that dealt only with married people living in their own home together as husband and wife sexually - Deuteronomy 24:1-4 & Genesis 2:24.

[@moniquefacey5760]

So many people are going to hell.smh

[@JayBeenCbosen]

No frfr

[@withoutcontroversyministri9955]

THERE IS ONLY TWO EXCEPTIONS FOR DIVORCE IN THE BIBLE. God recognizes that divorce will occur, even among His children. A divorced and/or remarried believer should not feel any less loved by God, even if the divorce and/or remarriage is not covered under the possible exception clause of Matthew 5:32 The 2 Exemptions! Divorce is allowed when a spouse commits immortality or the spouse is abusive. Only than is remarriage allowed!

[@TheTaurel]

@@moniquefacey5760 if they divorced and remarried on the one basis of sexual infidelity, as Jesus pointed out at both Matthew 5:31,32 & 19:9 - they are not in error Scripturally. And they are not condemned by God for any kind of destruction or damnation. Sexual infidelity in marriage is an exception to Paul's statements that ' wife or husband are bound for life and must not leave each other.'

[@withoutcontroversyministri9955]

THERE IS ONLY TWO EXCEPTIONS FOR DIVORCE IN THE BIBLE. God recognizes that divorce will occur, even among His children. A divorced and/or remarried believer should not feel any less loved by God, even if the divorce and/or remarriage is not covered under the possible exception clause of Matthew 5:32 The 2 Exemptions! Divorce is allowed when a spouse commits immortality or the spouse is abusive. Only than is remarriage allowed!

[@withoutcontroversyministri9955]

Immorality

[@withoutcontroversyministri9955]

God recognizes that divorce will occur, even among His children. A divorced and/or remarried believer should not feel any less loved by God God’s plan for a married couple is to stay married as long as both spouses are alive (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:6). You said, “Till Death do us part”! BUT there are specific allowances for remarriage after a divorce such as adultery (Matthew 19:9). Another is desertion-when an unbelieving spouse leaves a believing spouse (1 Corinthians 7:12-15). Physical, sexual, or severe emotional abuse would be a sufficient cause for divorce and remarriage. God would never want you to remain in a abusive or Life Threatening relationship. Understand, God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16), and God is merciful and forgiving. Every divorce is a result of sin, either on the part of one spouse or both. Does God forgive divorce? Absolutely! Divorce is no less forgivable than any other sin. Forgiveness of all sins is available through faith in Jesus Christ (Matthew 26:28 God wants you to live a Peaceful, Happy Life. Living in a bad relationship will never give you that. Evangelist James Dominick

[@PhilippeNicholson-qn2jy]

I really think those law protects only women...you get married because the law said it you just do it to be rightfull now the wife cheats you shall not divorce even of the wife come back you should take her back because you dont want to be alone... Yet the wife has done all type of shit outside... 1 regret having join the church because even in trouble you see no help... So why shall 1 sacrifice myself

[@marlonelmorejr5569]

This is why you have to get a godly wife because if you have a godly wife, she will 90% of the time not cheat and if she does cheat and understands that she cannot remarry. It’ll be a higher chance that she either reconciles comes back the right thing because God is watching if you have an ungodly wife who could care less about the law of God, then you have even bigger problems. I suggest finding a wife is a good thing. God said he who finds a wife finds a good thing and favor in the eyes of the Lord.

[@daughtersofsarah7844]

No sir both parties are vulnerable. Men are more likely to cheat. So if this happens according to the pastors teaching the wife must stay with the cheating husband. Godly men need to marry godly women.

[@marlonelmorejr5569]

@@daughtersofsarah7844 yeah I agree same thing Vice versa

[@TheTaurel]

@@daughtersofsarah7844 That is a completely wrong teaching Gino Jennings has y'all believing. At Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 the original Greek word Matthew used to record Jesus' exceptional rule was not Fornication - but Porneia. And Porneia covered more than just Fornication but All sexual sins outside of marriage like: Adultery, Homosexuality, Beastiality, Prostitution, etc. If naked genital were being used outside the marriage bed - it fell under this word Porneia Matthew used to state the lord Jesus' position. Plus both Matthew 19:1-9 and Mark 10:1-12 are talking about the same exact debate Jesus and the Pharisees were having. Only difference is Matthew was more specific on the 1 ground for divorce & remarriage; And t Mark didn't concentrate to mention Jesus stating that Adultery (Porneia of any kind) is the only 1 scriptural ground for remarriage after a divorce. But this is the same occasion & must be put together to get the complete picture. And Luke 16:18 as well have to be understood in harmony with Matthews full accounting of what Jesus' position was for his followers. Or else Jesus' words are two different things - a complete contradiction. Also Jesus and the Pharisees were not discussing 2 types of husband's and wives there, as Gino Jennings implies, they were only discussing people fully married not engaged. He wrongly teaches this because he either doesn't understand or just ignores the real meaning of how the New Testament word Porneia at Matthew 19:9 means more than Fornication - as just pointed out. So he tells everyone Jesus is talking about people who are "espoused" or engaged to be married. And that's completely a false doctrine. Just look at the verses at both Matthew 19:1-9 or Mark 10:1-12 and notice how they are debating by using Deuteronomy 24:1-4 & Genesis 2:24 to make their points. Both of those scriptures have absolutely nothing to do with engaged people - but only married people. Jesus contrasted his new superior law for his followers to Moses' old one that favored the hard hearted Jews wanting to divorce for all kinds of reason. Jesus pointing out this would be no more, but only one ground - Porneia. Not knowing this truth or deliberately in pride ignoring it has caused many to agree with him and altered their lives around it . Some thinking they have no choice but stay in an Adulterous marriage ; Leave a newly formed family even with kids, wait for the former mate to die to be free to re-marry, or go back or wait for them to reconcile. Many of these mislead folks even had a chance to re-marry after a scriptural Adulterous divorce and turned it down because of this false twisted teaching & remained single anywhere from 5-20+ years I've read in the comments at times. Or they live in shame and fear they going to burn in hell or he destroyed by God after divorcing on the grounds of Adultery and remarrying. Because he wrongly tells them, that an 'Adulterous divorced mate is still your living mate'. And that's not true under those circumstances - they are now you're former mate and God no longer recognizes that marriage as valid any more on that basis of Porneia . All completely sad and unscriptural. So yes as Paul pointed out in Romans and 1 Corinthians, 'husbands and wives are supposed to be bound forever untill death frees one, or if they separate stay single and try to reconcile' -since 'God really does hate a divorcing' as Malachi wrote. But Adultery(Porneia) is the only one exception recognized by God without condemnation.

[@garrycripps2]

What about 25 years of living together and guy has affair for 20years what’s that?

[@PhinaLuv]

Adultery

[@philipbuckley759]

a strange form of teaching, but dedicated to the truth, eh...

[@TheTaurel]

@@philipbuckley759 Yes it is "a strange form of teaching" because it isn't accurately based on the Bible ; But instead Gino Jennings reading a twisted re-interpretation into the scriptures. Because the Bible DOES justify divorce and remarriage if sexual infidelity is involved. And those verses at Matthew 5:31,32 & Matthew 19:1-9 are not intended for espoused or engaged couples.

[@edwinclairmonte4984]

So if i have sex with a divorce woman am i an adultor or a fornicator ? Also if she is divorce and i was never married but i then marry her am i in fornication or adultry

[@MsJordanRain]

Fornicator…Fornicator… you can’t be a husband to an already married woman even if she is “divorced” and her husband is still alive. She is still married as long as her husband lives and if you get her she is practicing adultry and you would be fornicating.

[@Hallaneious]

@@edwinclairmonte4984 Well it really depends on what either her ground was to divorce her husband Or if she got into any sexual activities after they divorced. Let me explain: First of all having ANY KIND of sex outside of God ordained marriage between a man and a woman is a sin period. 1st: If a single man was to have sexual relations with her and she was divorced from a marriage where the basis was any reason other than Adultery in the marriage - then he'd be commiting Fornication with a woman commiting Adultery on her husband. Because as Jesus pointed out at both Matthew 5:32 &19:9 you would have to be actually married to her for it to be truly viewed as an Adulterous marriage. But not married to her, the man is committing Fornication and she is committing Adultery - since she wasn't divorced from an Adulterous marriage but some other reason. 2nd: On the other hand If you actually married her and again her divorce wasn't because of Adultery in the marriage, then as both those Scriptures in Matthew point out - you'd be viewed as in an Adulterous marriage for marrying her. Because there was no Adultery as the basis for her divorce that freed her to remarry. 3rd: Let's say she's divorced for some reason other than Adultery in the marriage, and before she met you she started having sex with another man or men, or maybe she started even having sex with you, clearly there's been no reconciliation with the former husband ; So now that marriage is no longer recognized as valid in the eyes of Yahweh/Jehovah. Because Adultery or Adulterers took place. Understand Matthew 19:9 IS NOT talking about single people who are "espoused or betrothed" to be married, as is said by some ministers like him ; that verse is directed to folks who are already married. And what proves this is if you look at the entire context of the Scriptures starting at Matthew 19:1-9 ; there Jesus and the Pharisees are clearly debating about married people. Because both of them quoted Scriptures to each other that obviously are dealing with Married people ; 'who have grown up & left their parents home, are now living on their own, and became one flesh through sexual relations. At some point some husband gives the wife a written certificate of divorce and sends her out of his home. She then had legal protection because of that document to remarry another man who could do the same divorce procedure and send her out of his home. But God found it distasteful for her to return to the previous husband because of the sexual involvement with the other husband'. So when Jesus went on to say Moses allowed the hard hearted Jews to divorce on any grounds they wanted, But that he, Jesus, now would only allow it on 1 ground of PORNEIA - that was still a continuation of the same type of married people he and the Pharisees were talking about - based on the Scriptures they both used. The Pharisees the quoted from DEUTERONOMY 24:1-4 and Jesus quoted GENESIS 2:24. Jesus was simply contrasting his new superior law on divorce and remarriage to Moses old one. He was not suddenly talking about people who were considered husband and wife before marriage because they were engaged or "espoused/betrothed" to be married. He was still talking about married people. Lastly since the entire New Testament was written in Greek, Matthew used the Greek word PORNEIA to express Jesus' position. PORNEIA was the word they used in those days to cover not just Fornication only but, Adultery, Homosexuality, Beastiality, Prostitution and more - if the genitals were used outside of the marriage between a husband and wife. And most significantly there are examples of this in the Bible to prove this also besides the documents of that time period of Jesus and his Apostles. So I hope this has been helpful for you going forward to make a wise decision. 🙏🤗

[@princeplayzytp7345]

You will committing fornication

[@enokelole1864]

Only those who are single can fornicate & those who are married can commit adultery. 4:13

[@enokelole1864]

Only those who are single can fornicate & those who are married can commit adultery.

[@Hallaneious]

"Just a cry for clarity" you say ? Well here it is in a nutshell: "Gino Jennings is WRONG &: falsely misleading you in this matter of divorce and remarriage !" He has twisted and read out of context Scriptures to put his own misinterpretation on this subject..... The Bible's True teaching of this is: The only one ground God does allow for divorce and remarriage is Adultery of any kind with another living or dead being involving the genitals for sexual gratification - PORNEIA ! - MATTHEW 19:9 Porneia means much more than Fornication as wrongly translated in old Bibles translations like King James ( but corrected as Sexual Immorality in most up to date modern translations). That Greek word Matthew used at both Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 covers ANY AND ALL SEXUAL INTERCOURSES OR GENITAL GRATIFICATION OUTSIDE OF THE MARRIAGE BED, BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE. Gino Jennings teaching that those scriptures are about engaged to be married couples is completely WRONG & RIDICULOUS, as the context of Matthew 19:1-9 clearly shows by Jesus and the Pharisees quoting DEUTERONOMY 24:1-4 and GENESIS 2:24 to each other to make their point. Those Scriptures are only about MARRIED COUPLES and in no way about engaged couples (who only had the husband and wife title - because they weren't married yet). Folks don't be misled by this false interpretation and alter your life in error because of it as so many have in the comments on these channels. Divorce and remarriage on the one basis of direct sexual infidelity of any is a one exception to the statement of Paul that 'husband and wife are bound together for life until death....' as mentioned in Romans 7 and 1Corinthians 7. Complete abandonment by the guilty party might be another. But definitely Adultery (which is covered by that Greek word PORNEIA) is Scriptural grounds for divorce and remarriage -;if you can't reconcile.

[@RyanREAX]

If its that easy to get out of a marriage then just ask your wife to cheat on you so you both can move on… see how that totally cripples your view point? It would make it easy for anybody to escape marriage.

[@Hallaneious]

@RyanREAX Your reasoning is flawed. Regardless of whether it seems easy to get out of the marriage by 'just asking your mate to cheat on you' - you seem to overlook the fact that Jesus did say at both Matthew 5:31-32 & especially 19:9 that sexual infidelity is the only ground to seek a divorce by apparently the innocent party - if no reconciliation is possible. Because God really does "hate a divorcing" as Malachi pointed out - but apparently temporarily allows this single one thing here as Jesus mentioned. Actually this single reason actually makes it more difficult to divorce compared to the 'any reasons or cause' to divorce that the Pharisees mentioned to Jesus at Matthew 19:1-9. Because this was what they were used to being able to do since Moses granted their hard hearts the law to do so - Deuteronomy 24:1-4. But Jesus now made it more difficult to insisting he would only allow it on ONE BASIS of sexual infidelity. This is why at Matthew 19:10 the Disciples upon hearing this said, 'if such is the case - it is better not to marry at all'. Because prior to Jesus setting this new standard for his followers, they were used to this divorcing & remarrying easily for any reason at all. Plus to encourage someone to sin or stumble, by encouraging them to do wrong, is discouraged in God's Word the Bible - Romans 14:13 & 21/ Mark 9:42.

[@withoutcontroversyministri9955]

THERE IS ONLY TWO EXCEPTIONS FOR DIVORCE IN THE BIBLE. God recognizes that divorce will occur, even among His children. A divorced and/or remarried believer should not feel any less loved by God, even if the divorce and/or remarriage is not covered under the possible exception clause of Matthew 5:32 The 2 Exemptions! Divorce is allowed when a spouse commits immortality or the spouse is abusive. Only than is remarriage allowed!

[@byeyeleenblayk7862]

But yet he divorced his wife n married another .... (so who run by flesh) doesn't that make him a HYPOCRITE YES IT DOES

[@TheTaurel]

@@byeyeleenblayk7862 who or what are you talking about?🤷

[@LawnthayDavis]

It says except it be for fornication!: I don't understand......

[@TheTaurel]

@@LawnthayDavis I believe I understand your confusion. Many older translations of the Bible, like the original King James used the word Fornication at both Matthew 5:31,32 & 19:9. And this has led some ministers, such as Gino Jennings, to teach it's referring to engaged to be married couples, who had only the title of husband and wife before marriage - such as Joseph and Mary before Jehovah's Angel was directed to tell Joseph to 'take Mary to his home as his complete wife'. They only did that in Israel if they were married. - Matthew 1:20-24. These ministers reason that way because the word Fornication does refer to single people of the opposite sex - having sexual relations. Whereas a married person can't really be guilty of Fornication by definition - but instead Adultery. So they say A those Scriptures in Matthew are about single engaged couples. But that's completely inaccurate because if you look at the entire context of Matthew 19:1-9, and consider the Scriptures both the Pharisees and Jesus used - it's obvious they were discussing married people - not those who were betrothed or engaged to be married - Deuteronomy 24:1-4 & Genesis 2:24. But here is another error of these ministers: When Matthew wrote his Gospel, it was written in Greek like all of the rest of the New Testament was - not English. In those Scriptures of Matthew, he used the original Greek word Porneia, not the English word Fornication, to express the lord Jesus' position. Years ago Bible scholars didn't fully understand how broad the word Porneia was. They only knew it to refer to either Prostitution or Fornication. But researching how the word Porneia was used in the everyday language of Jesus and the Apostles day, and More Importantly how also the Bible uses that word to refer to ALL SEXUAL ACTIVITIES involving direct contact of the genitals - outside of marriage has given better clarity to understanding it now. Two classic examples of this is seen at 1Corinthians 5:1: where Paul chastises the Corinthian Church for tolerating a man that is sexually involved with his own father wife. The Scripture does not show if he was married or single himself. But this woman his direct mother or stepmother, it was still considered incest and forbidden - Deuteronomy 22:30....Plus she being married to his father brought also the sin of Adultery in this sordid sexual mess. But originally Paul like Matthew used the word Porneia, not Fornication, to refer to all of this sexual mess.....Then there is the statement by Jesus' younger brother at Jude 7. There he used that original word of Porneia to describe A L L the sexual depravities from Fornication, Bisexuality and Homosexuality that was rampant between the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah and other towns around them. Where as the older translations just called it Fornication, because of limited understanding. Certainly Bisexuality or Homosexuality are not Fornication in any kind of way. This s is why now with better understanding of Porneia's broad meaning modern translations, like the New King James, no longer say Fornication in places where more than just Fornication was involved - but will say something like Sexual Immorality or Sexual depravity etc etc - because those expressions cover a wide range to fit Porneia's true meaning. So when Matthew stated Jesus' saying 'unlike Moses allowed these hard hearted Jews to divorce and re-marry on any reason they chose ; He (Jesus) would now only allow it on the one and only sole basis of sexual infidelity of some sort. Porneia was used in those days to cover not just Fornication and Prostitution but also: Adultery, Homosexuality, Beastiality, Incest and Pedophilia as well. So if ones mate is guilty of any of these sexual sins, and one can't reconcile with them, for whatever reason, divorcing them and re-marrying someone else is not Scripturally forbidden or condemned. Adultery (Porneia) of any kind is an exception to what Paul wrote at both Romans 7 and 1Corinthians 7, 'that a man and a woman are bound together for life in marriage, unless death comes along to one ; And they must not leave each other'. Outside of Adultery of some sort, perhaps a mate abandoning the marriage in certain cases is another exception that frees the innocent mate from being bound to that mate who has abandoned the union. Adultery, which is covered by the Bible word Porneia, is proper Scriptural ground for divorce. And if one chooses to re-marry, it is not a sin against God, who really does 'hate a divorcing' as Malachi pointed out - but is temporarily allowed now.

[@Hallaneious]

Well truth be told yes there are some preachers who are properly teaching the word of God correctly. But he isn't on this particular subject. While he is correct in stating there are two types of husbands and wives mentioned in the scriptures: the betrothed or espoused to be married type and those who are already completely married - However this occasion of the lord Jesus dialoguing with the Pharisees is definitely not about engaged to be married people - they were only discussing those who are married. Mr. Jennings is taking scripture out of context and putting his own twisted spin on this subject. And this is how: Both Matthew 19:1-9 & Mark 10:1-12 are both about the same occasion, the only difference is while Matthew was more detailed on Jesus complete state about divorce & remarriage - Mark wasn't and only concentrated on the part about 'don't divorce'. Sometimes Bible writers who are talking about the same thing do this at times. Mark made mention of Jesus saying even a woman could divorce her husband - but Matthew didn't - but this is the same conversation. Jesus' position can not be a contradiction on any level, saying in Matthew its ok to divorce and remarry on the 1 proper scriptural ground, but then saying it's not in Mark. You have put the two accounts together to understand Jesus complete statement on divorce and remarriage. And so is thus the case with Luke 16:18 -it must be understood in view of Jesus' complete statement mentioned at both Matthew 5:32 and 19:1-9, that there is one 1 scriptural ground for divorce and remarriage. That Jesus and the Pharisees were not discussing engaged peope is seen from the scriptures both the Pharisees and Jesus used to make their points. The Pharisees went to Deuteronomy 24:1-4 and Jesus Genesis 2:24. Both of those scriptures speak of, 'men and women who have grown up and left their parents home as married people living in their own home, now having sexual relations. At some point some man writes an official document or certificate of divorce and gives it to the woman and sends her out of his home...She now was legally free to remarry and live in her new husbands home and he could do the same divorce procedure and also send her out of his home as well - but she could not go back to the 1st husband because JahGod found that distasteful in his eyes sexually'. Look those scriptures up for yourself and see how they are both talking a married people - and not the engaged So when Jesus mentioned Moses allowing them to divorce on any ground the hard hearted Jews wanted, he went on to now show that from this point onward those who'd be his followers only had one ground to divorce and remarry. He was simply contrasting his now superior rule or law to Moses' old one as obsolete now. He was not suddenly in the middle of their discussion about married people to start talking about engaged couples breaking up - thats an error of Mr. Jennings reading that twisted narrative in there on hus own. Just look at the entire context of scripture from verse 1 onward and look up the scriptures they appealed to and its obvious. From the time Jesus and the Pharisees started talking it was about only married people as those two sriptures they use clearly show - not engaged couples as Joseph and Mary were before Jah married them 30 years earlier. Another big error is Mr. Jennings not understanding or deliberately ignoring the fact of Jesus originally not using the word Fornication at both Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 - as was done for several years in older translations like the King James Bible. That was done because of very limited understanding of what the word Matthew originally used to state Jesus' new law meant in its entirety. The word was written in Greek, as all of the New Testament was, not old King James Bible English ; and that word meant more than just Fornication between two unmarried people if the opposite sex. The word was PORNEIA and covers ALL SEXUAL SIN OUTSIDE OF MARRIAGE INVOLVING THE GENITALS WITH ANOTHER BEING - LIVING OR DEAD. It was use in Jesus and the Apostles day to refer to: Beastiality, Fornication, Homosexual, Pedophilia, Incest and Adultery - all sexual sins outside of the marriage bed and forbidden in scripture. There are examples in the Bible that show this word used to describe sinful sexual situations that were more than just Fornication: Like the man in the Corinthian Church Paul condemned for having sex with his mother/stepmother because she was 'his fathers wife'. Wether he was married of not is not mentioned, but doing this with mother/stepmother was considered Incest either way - plus she being married added the element of Adultery as well. 1 CORINTHIANS 5:1 But when Paul, like Matthew wrote this in Greek, he did not use the English word Fornication - he used the word PORNEIA there originally to describe the entire sordid sexual mess. Another is JUDE vs.7, there Jude also writing in Greek used that word PORNEIA to describe ALL of the disgusting sexual depravity that caused Sodom and Gomorrahs destruction by God. GENESIS 19:4-9 makes it very clear Homosexuality, Bisexuality and lesbianism was obviously rampant there ; Because the Bible speaks of, 'all the men from young boys to old men were involved in wanting to have sex with the two men visiting Lots home and Lot as well.' This why to have called it Fornication as many older translations did, because of limited knowledge of what PORNEIA really meant, made no accurate sense. So today usually basically all updated versions like the New King James say: "Sexual Immorality" because it better matches the broader application for what PORNEIA really means. Because clearly in Sodom and Gomorrah men having sex with men wasn't Fornication - but homosexuality and couldn't produce 'young boys' as Genesis 19 pointed out. These errors on the part of Mr. Jennings has caused many to alter their lives in ways they shouldn't have had too or feel shamed into believing a scriptural divorce on the one ground of Adultery (PORNEIA) as Jesus said, is wrong. Just look at the comments on these channels and see those whose marriage ended in a scriptural divorce and wanted to remarry someone good to them, but learned this teaching and backed out of it. Or others told by him that they have to either wait for their former spouse to come back to them or die - freeing them to remrry because of death. Still others believed from him they must break up a new marriage, even with kids, and leave & they have done so etc etc. And its all based on Mr. Jennings twisted unscriptural narrative. And should be pointed out to help people know the truth.

[@GodsChild1249]

🚨Nobody's reading your incorrect essay. Your "philosophy" and "ideology" is wrong. Pastor is 1,000% right and your WRONG‼️The end.

[@Dmarcel81]

@@GodsChild1249amen !!People are just too hard hearted & don’t want to feel guilty so they don’t want to believe it

[@TheTaurel]

@@GodsChild1249 My "ideology" & "philosophy" you say? Hey a "GodsChild1249" I broke it all down very simply & stated facts that included even the Bible itself to make these points. All you have just done is discredit what I proved with absolutely nothing to back up what you're saying. So show me how I am wrong Biblically and not just say "the pastor is right..." Because he really is completely wrong & has misled folks, on this matter, to alter their lives in the wrong way. Is he probably a good sincere man? I don't doubt at all - but sincerely and a thunderous theatrical preaching from him if he is telling you a twisted gospel - doesn't make him correct. Again I have proven myself with evidence - you have not. Don't be so in love with any man you blind yourself to evidence of Gods word to the contrary. The balls in your court now - show me where I was wrong 😊

[@TheTaurel]

@@Dmarcel81 It has nothing whatsoever to do with being "hard hearted & not wanting to believe" - it's about accurate evidence. 2Timothy 3:16 says, '...the Scriptures are inspired of God & given to us for the ...correcting or setting matters right & reproving...' among other reason. So as I just pointed out to "Godschild" - I laid down information that didn't originate with me but are actual facts on mistranslating things, which evidence now shows of the language the New Testament was originally written in to prove that Fornication is a mistranslation there for the word Porneia. And Jesus was not at Matthew 19:9 switching gears from talking about married people with the Pharisees to talk about engaged or espoused to be married couples. I asked that folks relook at all that and reason on God's word - because this teaching really is incorrect. So just like "GodsChild", don't be so taken by a thunderous theatrical speaker - but be moved by facts of Gods word the Bible. So show me where in what I wrote I was wrong?

[@Dmarcel81]

@@TheTaurel Romans 7: 1-3 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. Plain and simple !

[@scripture4541]

This man is way off he adding his own twist , shame y’all don’t see it

[@daughtersofsarah7844]

I thought the same too

[@frankmoreno7216]

Divorce is for flesh lovers like u. 😂

[@frankmoreno7216]

You probably got a second piece of 🥩 that belongs to someone else. 😂

[@Tassy.1k]

@@daughtersofsarah7844like what?

[@Hallaneious]

You're absolutely correct, it's sad most of these folks don't see it. For one thing Jesus' position Matthew wrote about at both Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 did not originally say Fornication. The word Fornication was added to older translations like the King James Bible, because there was very little research done on the original Greek word Matthew used. That New Testament word Matthew used was PORNEIA. And back in Jesus' day and still to this day that Greek word means all kinds of sexual activities involving the genitals - outside of marriage. PORNEIA was used to cover not just Fornication but also Beastiality, Homosexuality, Adultery, Pedophilia, Prostitution and Incest. This why modern translations no longer use the word Fornication at Matthew 5:32 & 19:9 by about 95% - because PORNEIA has broad application. Instead most now, including the New King James Bible say something like: Sexual Immorality or Sexual unfaithfulness etc. Whereas Fornication is limited. A good example to show this at Jude 7. Here the extreme Homosexuality and all the other sexual depravity of Sodom and Gomorrah is called originally PORNEIA not Fornication. Because after all, bisexual men were having sex with women too. This obvious from the fact Genesis 19:4-9 speaks about, 'All the young boys to old men from these cities gather outside lots home to force homosexual sex on Lots visitors and Lot as well'. These boys were clearly the result of sex with women too. But to describe all of the sexual sins Jude called it PORNEIA originally. Fornication as older translations put it there doesn't really make sense - since Homosexuality is not the same as sex between people of the opposite sex, not married, but having sex. Plus Gino is wrong in saying that Matthew 19:9 is about engaged couples, that were considered husband and wife in Israelite culture. Besides the fact the word was PORNEIA (or Sexual Immorality) the context of Scripture before verse 9 starting with verse 1 makes it clear Jesus and the Pharisees were debating about fully married couples and not the engaged. This is obvious by both the Pharisees and Jesus referring to Deuteronomy 24:1-4 and Genesis 2:24 - both of those Scriptures are dealing with married couples who have, 'left their parents home and are now living as married peoples in their own home, having sexual relations be one flesh.' Infact Deuteronomy there speaks about the written document of divorce the Pharisees mentioned and about the woman being dismissed out of the home with it. To protect her from stoning if she became another man's wife - because she now with the document had legal right to do so. So when Jesus said Moses's law on allowing these hard hearted Jews to divorce on any and all grounds ; And then contrasted his new law that won't allow divorce and remarriage except on 1 basis of PORNEIA (or Adultery) - he was still talking about the same fully married people - not the "espoused" or engaged couples. You are correct. And Gino Jennings has twisted and read Scriptures out of context - this altering the lives of many who believe this false doctrine. Not seeking a Scriptural divorce on the basis of Adultery and remarrying if they chose, or many others are living in shame who did, or he is ridiculously telling these people they must break up a new marriage (even if children are involved) and go back to the 1st mate or just hope they can reconcile; or just wait for them to die and be free then to remarry. All of this is twisted UNSCRIPTURAL nonsense by him.

[@scripture4541]

False

[@JM-bg2le]

Why is it false I’m confused can you divorce

[@scripture4541]

@@JM-bg2le yes, you can divorce, he is incorrect on his breakdown of Matthews, fornication means harlotry, so if your wife sleeps with another man, the type of harlotry that is is adultery, if she sleeps with another woman, the type of harlotry that is sodomy, so saving for the cause of harlotry , 1 Corinthians 5:1 cold, a man sleeping with his father’s wife fornication, Gino is breaking that scripture down way incorrectly

[@scripture4541]

@@JM-bg2le and he broke down Mark 10:11 incorrectly, let me ask you this question, where in the scripture does it say you can never remarry as long as your wife lives ?

[@neilmcdermott5520]

@@scripture4541Romans 7:2-3

[@gistorndlela3548]

@@JM-bg2le No God said I hate divorce, you can't divorce if you do you stay single until your partner die